Purification and characterization of a cytotoxin from Enterobacter cloacae

OBJECTIVE: To document our evolving surgical management of colonoscopic perforation and examine factors crucial to the improvement of patient care. DESIGN: We conducted a computer-based retrospective analysis of medical records (1980 through 1995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 57,028 colonoscopic procedures performed, 43 patients (0.075%, or 1 perforation in 1,333 procedures) had a colonic perforation. Two additional patients were treated after colonoscopy performed elsewhere. The outcomes analyzed included surgical morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-six women and 19 men who ranged in age from 28 to 85 years (median, 69) were treated for colonic perforation. More than 80% of perforations occurred during the latter half of the study period because of the increased volume of colonoscopic procedures (8 perforations among 12,581 examinations from 1980 through 1987 versus 35 perforations among 44,447 colonoscopies from 1988 through 1995). Emergency laparotomy was performed in 42 patients (93%). Perforations occurred throughout the colon: right side = 10; transverse = 9; and left side = 23. Three patients without evidence of peritoneal irritation fared well with nonoperative management. Most patients underwent primary repair or limited resection in conjunction with end-to-end anastomosis. In 14 patients (33%), an ostomy was created. One patient underwent laparotomy without further treatment. Intra-abdominal contamination ranged from none (31%) to local soiling (48%) to diffusely feculent (21%). Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients and were associated with older age (P = 0.01), large perforations (P = 0.03), and prior hospitalization (P = 0.04). No postoperative deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite a consistently low risk of colonic perforation, the increasing use of colonoscopy in our practice has resulted in an increased number of iatrogenic colonic perforations. In order to minimize morbidity and mortality, prompt operative intervention is the best strategy in most patients. Non-operative management is warranted in carefully selected patients without peritoneal irritation.     

Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management

BACKGROUND: Perforation of the esophagus is a deadly injury that requires expert management for survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective clinical review of 66 patients treated at Emory University affiliated hospitals for esophageal perforation between 1973 and 1993. RESULTS: Iatrogenic perforations accounted for 48 injuries (73%), barogenic perforations occurred in 12 patients (17%), trauma was causative in 3 (5%), and 3 patients had esophageal infection and other causes. Lower-third injuries occurred in 43 cases (65%), middle third in 14 (21%), and upper third in 9 (14%). Early contained perforations were managed successfully by limiting oral intake and giving parenteral antibiotics in 12 patients. Cervical perforations were drained without attempt at closure of the leak. Perforations with mediastinal or pleural contamination recognized early were managed by primary closure and drainage in 28 patients. Reinforcement of the primary closure using stomach fundus, pleural, diaphragmatic, or pericardial flap was performed in 16 patients. Those perforations that escaped early recognition required thoughtful management, using generous debridement and drainage and sometimes esophageal resection. The esophageal T tube provided control of leaks in 3 of these patients and was a useful adjunct. Using these management principles, we achieved a 76% survival rate for all patients. Six patients with perforations complicating endoesophageal management of esophageal varices were a high-risk subset with an 83% mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal perforation remains an important thoracic emergency. Aggressive operative therapy remains the mainstay for treatment; however, conservative management may be preferred for contained perforations and the esophageal T tube may be used for late perforations.     

Risk factors in the surgical management of perforated duodeno-pyloric ulcer

The election of the treatment in the pyloric-duodenal perforations pursues a double objective: to reduce the operative mortality and to reduce the risk of ulcerous relapse in the long run. The authors carry out a retrospective study of 100 pyloric-duodenal perforations treated in 12 years. Three risk factors of immediate mortality are demonstrated: the age, 70 years or older; elapsed time, equal or superior to 24 hours and the existence of a situation of preoperative hemodynamic shock. The global mortality of the series was of 12% and the index of relapses of 12%. The authors outline a therapeutic management in which the election of the treatment was modulated for the factors of mortality risk. Thus, the presence of one of these factors must lead to the accomplishment of single treatment in treating only the perforation. The absence of risk factors must lead to accomplish a definitive treatment through the resection or the suture of the perforation followed by any type of vagotomy and eventually a drainage operation. The results obtained with Taylor's vagotomy, as well as with laparoscopic methods have not yet been validated although, probably, in a near future they will be integrated in the first management of pyloric-duodenal perforations.     

Clinical observation of neonatal gastrointestinal perforation

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal perforation is an infrequent occurrence in neonates. Experience in its management is presented, while also attempting to analyze the factors affecting outcome. METHODS: From 1983 to 1992, 31 neonates with gastrointestinal perforation were treated at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed thoroughly. In the meantime, Mann-Whitney U and Yates' correction chi square tests were used to analyze the factors predicting the outcomes. RESULTS: There were 21 males and 10 females, among whom 16 were premature births. The median age at diagnosis was 5 day; half (16/31) had occurred during the first 5 days of life. Abdominal distension was the most common manifestation (87%). Hemograms at admission showed leukopenia in 32% (10/31) and thrombocytopenia in 40% (8/20) of the patients. Metabolic acidosis was present in 46% (13/28) of the patients. Peritoneal fluid and preoperative blood cultures were positive in 71% (17/24) and 50% (13/26) of the patients, and both of them had Gram-negative enterobacteriacea as the most common pathogen. The overall mortality rate was 58%. The highest mortality rate was associated with gastric perforation (100%), followed by small bowel (50%) and colon (50%) perforations. The predominant cause of perforation was necrotizing enterocolitis (14/31), with the most common site the terminal ileum (16/29). Four patients with necrotizing enterocolitis had multiple perforations. Others who underwent surgery showed single perforation. The major cause of death in those patients who received operation was sepsis (8/13). An initial arterial pH value higher than 7.25, and surgical procedure performed within two days after disease onset may predict a favorable outcome (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal perforation is a life-threatening complication in neonates. A better survival rate can be obtained by cooperation among neonatologists, pediatric surgeons and the nursing staff taking care of these high risk babies.     

Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Is it justified?

OBJECTIVE: Experiences obtained with nonoperative treatment (NOT), i.e. total prohibition of per oral food intake for a minimum of 7 days, administration of combinations of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and parenteral hyperalimentation, are described in the management of esophageal perforations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The place, value, and indication of NOT in the management of esophageal perforation has not yet been unequivocally defined. As a result, contradictory data have been published regarding the outcome of NOT. METHODS: During the past 15 years (1979 to 1994), 20 of 86 patients (23.3%) with esophageal perforation have been treated nonoperatively from the outset. In this group, perforations were located to the upper, middle, and lower third of the esophagus in 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively. In the operative management group (OT)--in which conservative (drainage, endeprothesis), reconstructive (suture, reinforced suture), and radical (resection) surgical methods were applied--lesions were preponderantly located in the lower one third of the esophagus (56.1%--37/66). As to the interval between the perforation and the onset of treatment, 14 patients had been diagnosed within 24 hours, whereas in 6 cases treatment had been begun beyond 24 hours. RESULTS: NOT could be successfully carried out in 16 patients; the decision to use NOT had to be revised in 4 other cases (Table 1). Two patients were lost; the mortality rate was 10% (2 of 20). The rate of complications was lower in the NOT group (20%, or 4 of 20) than in the OT group (50%, or 33 of 66). CONCLUSIONS: NOT can be suggested for the treatment of intramural perforations. In the case of transmural perforation, this approach should be taken into consideration if the esophageal lesion is circumscribed, is not in neoplastic tissue, is not in the abdominal cavity, and is not accompanied by simultaneous obstructive esophageal disease; in addition, symptoms and signs of septicemia should be absent.     

The role of esophagectomy in the management of esophageal perforations

BACKGROUND: Despite the many advancements made in thoracic surgery, the management of patients with esophageal perforation remains problematic and controversial. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1995, 27 esophagectomies were performed for perforation of the thoracic esophagus. A retrospective review of the records of these patients was carried out, and a scoring scale developed by Elebute and Stoner to grade the severity of sepsis was applied. RESULTS: Among the 27 patients undergoing esophagectomy for a perforation, the interval between rupture and esophagectomy was less than 24 hours in only 11 patients (40.7%). Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 4 patients (14.8%) and nonsurgical complications, in 7 (25.9%). The hospital mortality rate was 3.7% (1/27). In 14 patients, primary reconstruction was performed in the bed of the excised esophagus. There were no anastomotic leaks in this subgroup. This suggests that an anastomosis between viable, well-vascularized tissues is more important for successful healing than avoidance of some degree of contamination of the adjacent mediastinum. On follow-up, which averages 41 months, 73% of patients (16/22) have neither symptoms nor complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal resection definitively eliminates the source of intrathoracic sepsis, the perforation, and the affected esophagus. Reconstruction carried out in one stage does not increase operative morbidity. Esophageal resection and reconstruction is a valid approach even in cases of spontaneous perforation in which the diagnosis is markedly delayed.     

Specific acute colonic disorders

This article reviews a variety of specific colonic disorders that may have been an acute clinical presentation. Less common causes of colonic obstruction include volvulus, intussusception, and hernias. Nonobstructive colonic dilatation is most often due to pseudo-obstructions and toxic megacolon. Several miscellaneous disorders discussed include colonic perforation, complications of leukemia that may affect the colon, and pseudomembranous colitis. The pathogenesis and clinical aspects of these disorders are reviewed, but the radiologic features are emphasized.     

Febrile state, bloody diarrhea and megacolon

We report about a forty year old female patient with severe bloody diarrhoea and fever over a period of 14 days due to an infection with Salmonella enteritidis. X-ray of the abdomen showed a toxic megacolon. With the diagnosis of an infectious colitis we started therapy with ciprofloxacin i/v. The toxic megacolon progressed despite intensive care and parenteral nutrition. Additionally the patient received metronidazole i/v and in combination with a roll technique in bed in the knee-elbow-position the leucocytosis and the megacolon decreased. A toxic megacolon is in about 3% associated with an infection with Salmonella enteritidis. It is essentially diagnosed by X-ray. Patients should receive intensive care, and because of the high mortality rate an interdisciplinary management is required. The article discusses the major differential diagnosis of the toxic megacolon, as well as the pathogenesis and therapy of Salmonella ent, infection. In case of an infection with Salmonella ent. physicians should acknowledge the possibility of development of a toxic megacolon.     

Spontaneous haemothorax in a mild haemophiliac

A series comprised of 28 patients (five with perforations of the recto-sigmoid colon and 23 with lodged rectal foreign bodies) is presented. The symptomatology, physical, laboratory and x-ray findings are described. Methods of management are discussed, with emphasis on the operative management of perforations and the conservative approach to retained foreign bodies. It is felt that these protocols will be useful to physicians who see this practice less frequently. X-rays of two more unusual cases are depicted. A thorough review of the literature is also presented. This is the largest reported series of patients with retained rectal foreign bodies and/or perforations. The series includes two female patients, a heretofore unreported occurrence.     

Outcome of large-bowel perforation in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Perforation of the colon is seldom associated with malignant disease. Operative mortality varies widely in published studies and little is known about patterns of failure and long-term outcome. An observational study was undertaken to assess the outcome of colorectal cancer complicated by perforation. METHOD: We reviewed a series of 83 consecutive patients treated during a 14-year period at one institution. RESULTS: Fifty-four (65 percent) patients had perforation of the tumor itself, and 29 (35 percent) had diastatic perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor. Twenty-six (31.5 percent) patients had metastatic disease at laparotomy. Primary resection of the diseased segment was performed in 47 (87 percent) patients with perforation of the tumor itself and in 21 (72.4 percent) patients with diastatic perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor. However, only 57 patients (39 (72.2 percent) with perforation of the tumor itself; 18 (62 percent) with diastatic perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor; P = not significant) were potentially cured. Operative mortality was 16.7 and 48.3 percent, respectively (P < 0.01) and correlated significantly with Hinchey's stage (P < 0.001) and advanced disease (P = 0.023). At a mean follow-up of 43 (median 31) months, 21 (46 percent) of the 46 potentially cured survivors were alive. The local recurrence rate was 22.9 percent in patients with perforation of the tumor itself and 18.2 percent in patients with diastatic perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor (P = not significant). Peritoneal seeding occurred in 17 and 0 percent (P = not significant); the mean disease-free interval was 33.9 and 49.9 months (P = not significant); and five-year cumulative disease-related survival probability was 0.51 and 0.90 (P = 0.049), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diastatic perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor is associated with higher operative mortality and better cancer-related survival than a tumor perforating through the bowel wall. Early diagnosis in diastatic perforation and aggressive management of sepsis associated with radical surgical resection is recommended.     

Spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation is a rare and lethal complication in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Data of 9 patients with spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation occurring during chemotherapy were reviewed. RESULTS: All 9 patients were male with an average age of 54.4+/-2.5 years. The primary malignancies included 5 head and neck cancers, 2 esophageal cancers, 1 malignant lymphoma, and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom. The average interval between the onset of symptoms and surgery was 2.9+/-0.7 days (range: 16 hours to 7 days). Perforation was located on the duodenum (6 patients) and on the lower part of the body of the stomach (3 patients). Simple closure of the perforation was performed on 8 patients, and subtotal gastrectomy on 1 patient. Culture of the ascitic fluid of 8 patients revealed E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, streptococcus viridans, and enterococcus. Four patients (44.4%) had post-operative complications. The 30-day post-operative mortality was 44.4% (4/9). Three patients died of sepsis with multiple organ failure, and 1 died of hepatic failure. Age, anaemia, leukopenia, serum albumin levels, impaired renal or liver functions are not significant operative risk factors. Pre-operative shock is a significant factor in predicting operative mortality and complications. CONCLUSIONS: High index with suspicion of the disease with early treatment may improve survival of cancer patients with spontaneous gastroduodenal perforation.     

CYP2D6 genotype and smoking behaviour in cigarette smokers

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is one of the most dreaded complications in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the frequency of esophageal perforation after endoscopic procedures in a highly specialized endoscopy unit and compared clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either surgical or conservative management. METHODS: From January 1985 to June 1996, 1011 instrumental endoscopic procedures (dilatation and bougienage) were performed in our department. The computerized complication database was searched to identify all patients with esophageal perforation during this same period, and their records were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventeen esophageal perforations (1.7%) occurred in the course of 1011 procedures. Four perforations resulted from balloon dilatation, and 13 were secondary to bougienage. Six patients were managed surgically (35%), all of them recovering uneventfully. Eleven patients were managed conservatively, mainly because they were unfit for surgery. Survival rate in this group was 82%; only two patients died, both of whom had underlying malignant disease. CONCLUSIONS: The current concept in management of esophageal perforations comprises surgical as well as medical treatment. In well-selected cases, non-operative treatment can be considered with favorable results.     

Ogilvie's syndrome or colonic pseudo-obstruction. Apropos of 26 cases

From twenty six personal cases, the authors make a review of the literature. 92% of their cases are met in a post operative (28%), neurological (28%), general (24%) context, or in intensive care with assisted ventilation (36%). The major symptom is the meteorism (100%) with in one out of three cases, abdominal pain, vomiting, right iliac defense, absence of bowel sounds. Radiological distension involves mostly the right colon and the coecum (28%), right and transverse colon (40), sometimes the whole colon (32%). The mean diameter of the coecum reached 12 cm (9 to 25 cm). Early coloscopy was mandatory in 20 patients, of which 14 were cured, 13 patients were operated on, for suspicion of ischemia or perforation, because incertain diagnosis, or failure of colonoscopy. Ceocostomy or right hemicolectomy (55%) were performed rather than transverse colostomy. The surgical approach must be adapted to the anatomical lesions. Total mortality was 4% in this series. Early diagnosis of pseudo obstruction, early colonoscopy with intubation must allow to avoid surgery.     

Blunt abdominal trauma. A review of 637 patients

Although blunt abdominal trauma continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality, the care of these patients has improved significantly over the past 30 years. In order to evaluate the current status of management, we have reviewed retrospectively the medical records of all such patients admitted to the University of Mississippi Medical Center over a ten- year period (October 1, 1981 - September 30, 1991). Of the total of 637 patients, 61% were male and 39% female; 40% were between the ages of 20 and 29 years. Motor vehicle accidents accounted for approximately 80% of these injuries. Of the total, 399(62.6%) underwent laparotomy, 12 (3%) of which were nontherapeutic. The operative mortality rate was 13% and the overall mortality for the 637 patients was 8.5%. These results are compared with four previous series of blunt abdominal trauma patients. Women comprised a greater proportion in the two most recent series. The liver and spleen are the most commonly injured intra-abdominal organs; however, liver injuries have been reported in increasing numbers of patients in the most recent series. The incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomy is less with each succeeding series. Mortality rates have declined significantly and the 8.5% mortality in our patients is certainly indicative of this trend.     

Methods to detect the RYR1 G742A and A1565C mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia using a PCR-modified restriction sites technique

Tricyclic antidepressants are a class of drugs commonly used for the treatment of depression. Tricyclic antidepressants account for approximately 20 to 25 per cent of drug overdoses that require acute medical admission. The most common cause of mortality is cardiovascular toxicity (e.g., arrhythmia, heart block, or hypotension). Other morbidities include conditions secondary to anticholinergic effects (central and peripheral) and respiratory complications. Ileus, constipation and urinary retention are common peripheral anticholinergic sequelae, whereas unusual complications include pancreatitis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction with cecal perforation, and sigmoid colon gangrene. We report a case of imipramine overdose that was complicated by toxic megacolon with an associated perforation.     

Quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle function in a person with an unstable knee

Septal perforation is an avoidable complication of septal surgery, but it can also occur because of a variety of traumatic, iatrogenic, caustic, or inflammatory reasons. Symptoms usually are related to disruption of the normally laminar flow of air through the nasal passages. Crusting, bleeding, parosmia, and neuralgia can develop, leading the patient to seek medical care. When local hygiene and conservative care are unsuccessful in relieving symptoms, closure of the perforation is considered. Repair is often difficult because of the limited exposure and limited amounts of friable mucosa with impaired vascular supply. The failure of attempted closure of septal perforations can be as high as 80 percent. The authors have developed a graduated approach to the closure of septal perforations that tailors the surgical approach to the size and location of the defect. Perforations 0.5 to 2.0 cm in size were closed in 92.9 percent (13 of 14) of patients using an extended external rhinoplasty approach and bilateral posteriorly based mucosal flaps. Larger perforations (2.0 to 4.5 cm) were closed in 81.8 percent (18 of 22) of patients by a two-staged technique, using a midfacial degloving approach to medially advance posteriorly based, expanded mucosal flaps. With careful preoperative management and selection of the appropriate surgical technique, even moderate-to-large perforations can be repaired reliably with limited operative morbidity.     

Transfusion malaria in sick neonates

A 45-year-old woman was incidentally suspected to have megacolon. Chest X-rays showed elevated left diaphragm due to colonic gas, and the heart was deviated to the midline. Barium enema revealed marked dilation of the sigmoid colon, confirming the diagnosis of megacolon. Maximal diameter of the sigmoid colon was 23 cm, but she had no gastrointestinal symptoms. During the work up for megacolon, the presence of myotonic dystrophy was suspected. She had hatchet face, but was not bald. Muscles of the neck and extremities were slightly atrophic. There was percussion myotonia of the tongue and both hands, and grip myotonia of the hands. Laboratory examinations showed impaired glucose tolerance and low level of serum IgG. EMG showed myotonic discharges and myopathic units in the limbs. Brain CT imaging revealed a thick skull. Cases of myotonic dystrophy associated with marked megacolon are rare in Japan. Megacolon presents a high risk for ileus, volvulus, and rupture, and myotonic dystrophy is associated with a high operative and anesthesic risk. Megacolon, therefore, is an important complication to look for in the management of myotonic dystrophy.     

Traumatic aortic transections: eight-year experience with the "clamp-sew" technique

BACKGROUND: Because traumatic aortic transection is associated with high mortality rates, great debate exists about the appropriate operative technique for treatment of patients who have acute traumatic aortic transection. METHODS: To determine the safety and efficacy of the "clamp-sew" method, we retrospectively reviewed our 8-year experience treating 75 patients who had aortic injuries secondary to blunt trauma. Seventy-one of these patients were treated surgically. The clamp-sew method was used in all of these operations. RESULTS: Aortic cross-clamp time averaged 24 minutes (range, 14 to 36 minutes), with 4/71 having times in excess of 30 minutes. One patient (clamp time, 28 minutes) became paraplegic. Significant associated injuries were seen in 51/75 patients (48/71 patients with operation), including intrathoracic (35 patients), orthopedic (28 patients), intraabdominal (24 patients), and central nervous system (17 patients) damage. No patient died within 24 hours of operation. Overall 30-day mortality was 12% (9/75), with 7/9 having two or more aforementioned associated injuries. Of these 7, 5 had central nervous system injuries. Two of 9 died within 30 days without two or more associated injuries: 1 Jehovah's Witness of low hemoglobin, and 1 patient of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Although any of several maneuvers may be appropriate in managing traumatic aortic injuries, the simple "clamp-sew" technique is a safe and effective method for the treatment of traumatic aortic transections.     

Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization with gastro-oesophageal stapling in the management of acute variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Operation is required for patients with portal hypertension who have failed to respond to emergency sclerotherapy for control of acute variceal bleeding. This study evaluates the role of transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastro-oesophageal stapling for control of acute variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension of different aetiologies. METHODS: Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastrooesophageal stapling was performed in 65 patients (28 with cirrhosis, 17 with non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis and 20 with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction) in whom emergency endoscopic sclerotherapy, and/or pharmacotherapy and balloon tamponade had failed. The Sugiura procedure was modified to minimize operating time and to reduce the operative difficulties due to oesophageal wall necrosis after sclerotherapy. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was higher in patients with cirrhosis (P = 0.0003); sepsis was the leading cause of death (in nine of 18). A high mortality rate (12 of 15) was seen in patients with Child grade C cirrhosis. Control of bleeding was achieved in all patients. The procedure-related complication rate was 17 per cent with a 6 per cent oesophageal leak rate; four of 47 surviving patients developed oesophageal stricture. During a mean follow-up of 33 months, residual varices, recurrent varices and rebleeding were seen in three, two and three of 47 survivors. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastrooesophageal stapling is an effective and safe procedure for control of acute variceal haemorrhage with satisfactory long-term control, especially in patients without cirrhosis and low-risk patients with cirrhosis.