Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials

PURPOSE: To compare the shear bond strengths to dentin of four tooth-colored fluoride-releasing restorative materials that utilize different mechanisms of dentin-bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four materials were tested: a chemically-cured glass ionomer (Ketac-Fil); a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil); a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer in conjunction with a resin dentin-bonding agent (Vitremer); and a light-cured resin composite in conjunction with a resin dentin-bonding agent (Tetric). The enamel was removed from four sides of the twenty human noncarious extracted molars which had their roots embedded in acrylic blocks. Cylindrical samples of the materials were prepared in plastic molds and bonded to the dentin surface according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours of storage in a humidor, the samples were sheared with an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. RESULTS: Statistical evaluation (ANOVA and Duncan's test) suggests that the fluoride-releasing resin composite material utilizing a resin dentin-bonding agent provided a significantly greater mean shear bond strength (16.5 MPa) after 24 hours storage than any of the selected glass ionomer materials. Of the three glass ionomer materials compared, the light-cured resin-modified material with a resin dentin-bonding agent provided a significantly greater mean shear bond strength (6.7 MPa) than the light-cured resin-modified material without a resin dentin-bonding agent (3.0 MPa) or the chemically-cured material (3.8 MPa).     

Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength to enamel and dentine of two resin modified glass ionomers (Fuji Bond L.C. and Vitrebond) and two resin based adhesives (Prime&Bond 2.1 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose). METHODS: A total of 120 bond sites were prepared on either enamel (n = 60) or dentine (n = 60) on human molars by grinding the teeth flat with a 600 grit sandpaper. Each tooth substrate group was divided into four groups (n = 15) to match each material. Each of the four material systems was applied, according to the manufacturers instructions, to the bond sites. On top of the placed material, a microfilled composite was placed in a 2.5 mm diameter matrix and light-cured for 40 s. All specimens were thermocycled 500 times (5-55 degrees C). Shear bond strength values were determined 120 h after bonding using a Zwick testing machine. One-way ANOVA was used to determine whether significant differences (p < 0.05) existed among the material groups on enamel and dentine. Pairwise comparisons were used to determine significant differences (p < 0.05) among the four products. RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed strong significant differences on enamel (p = 0.0001) and dentine (p = 0.0172). The enamel bond strength values of the two resin based adhesives were significantly higher than one of the resin modified glass ionomers (Vitrebond), while the other resin modified glass ionomers did not differ from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. On dentine, however, Vitrebond performed significantly better than the two resin based adhesives. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated resin modified glass ionomers bonded better to dentine surfaces than to enamel surfaces, while the investigated resin based adhesive systems bonded better to enamel than to dentine.     

Protocols for the care of external fixator pin sites

The pre-cooperative or handicapped child with decay presents a special challenge to the practitioner and may require sedation or general anesthesia. Treatment with an interim restoration may delay treatment until the child is more mature and can accept dental treatment and is a more conservative approach than sedation, extractions or general anesthesia. Glass ionomer materials have been utilized for this application, but little is known about their retention to carious dentin. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of artificial dentin decay will affect the shear bond strength of two light-cured glass ionomer materials. VariGlass and Vitrebond glass ionomer materials were attached to carious and non-carious primary dentin surfaces and bond strengths determined. There were no significant differences in shear bond strengths between the decayed and non-decayed surfaces [p < or = .001]. VariGlass had higher shear bond strengths than Vitrebond only after a pre-treatment with the PAA containing liquid. Pre-treatment with the liquid provided with each light-cured glass ionomer was beneficial in all instances except for Vitrebond on non-decayed surfaces.     

The effect of air abrasion on shear bond strength to dentin with dental adhesives

This study compared the effects of different dentin surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of three adhesive systems. The adhesive systems included a resin-modified glass ionomer, Fuji II LC, and two dentin bonding systems, One Step and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. The surface treatments compared for each adhesive system were as follows: 1) the controls, which were conditioned, 2) air abrasion at 120 psi without conditioning, 3) air abrasion at 160 psi without conditioning, 4) air abrasion at 120 psi with conditioning, and 5) air abrasion at 160 psi with conditioning. The KCP 1000 Whisperjet was used for all air-abrasive specimens. Controls for each adhesive material (Fuji II LC, One Step, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) were bonded using manufacturers' recommendations. Results showed that air abrasion significantly lowered bond strength of the resin-modified glass ionomer, conditioned or nonconditioned (P < 0.01). Air abrasion alone significantly lowered bond strengths of the dentin bonding agent systems (P < 0.01). However, air abrasion plus conditioning of the dentin surface resulted in bond strengths that were similar to the conditioned-only specimens (P < 0.01).     

Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strengths

This in vitro study evaluated the effects of etchant type, surface moisture, and resin composite type on the shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. Three adhesives which bond to etched dentin were used in the study: All-Bond 2, Amalgambond, and Clearfil Photo Bond. Occlusal enamel was removed from 200 human molars to expose dentin. The dentin surfaces were etched, treated with a dentin adhesive system, and bonded with resin composite. After thermocycling and storage, the composite columns were fractured from dentin using an Instron machine. Bond strengths were calculated and subjected to a statistical analysis. Etchant type, surface moisture, and resin composite type all had significant effects on dentin bond strengths. Overall, the highest bond strengths were obtained with 10/3 etchant, moist dentin, and hybrid composite. The highest bond strengths for All-Bond 2 and Amalgambond were obtained by using the manufacturer's recommended etchant, moist dentin, and a hybrid composite. The mean bond strengths for All-Bond and Amalgambond under these conditions were 22.5 and 19.0 MPa, respectively. Clearfil Photo Bond had significantly lower bond strengths, but was relatively unaffected by changes in experimental conditions.     

Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations

OBJECTIVES: Until recently, esthetic inlay restorations in posterior teeth have been limited to cavities surrounded by enamel. Dentin adhesive systems in combination with luting composites and light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements offer a possibility for bonding ceramic inlays to cavities when the cervical margin is in dentin. This study was designed to compare in vitro marginal integrity of ceramic inlays bonded to dentin to restorations placed in cavities with margins located entirely in the enamel. METHODS: In the present in vitro study, the sealing abilities of a dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement, Vivadent) and resin-modified glass ionomers (Photac Fil, Photac Bond, ESPE; Dyract, De Trey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Industrial Corp.; and Vitremer, 3M Dental Products) used as luting agents in cavities extending beyond the cemento-enamel junction, were compared to the sealing abilities of a conventional luting composite (Vita Cerec Duo Cement, Vita) in cavities within sound enamel. SEM analysis and dye penetration were performed to evaluate marginal integrity at the cervical cavity margins. RESULTS: The dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement) rendered a marginal seal within the dentin similar to the quality obtained with the conventional luting procedures within sound enamel. When three out of the five resin-modified glass ionomers were used as luting agents (Dyract, Fuji II LC and Vitremer), the results were comparable to those reported for the dentin bonding agents and the conventional method. SIGNIFICANCE: Light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements may be considered as an alternative to dentin bonding agents when the cavity margins of ceramic inlay restorations are within the dentin. However, further studies, e.g., wear resistance, must be performed.     

Cysteine and glutathione deficiency in AIDS patients: a rationale for the treatment with N-acetyl-cysteine

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of accidental dentin primer contact with etched enamel on shear bond strength of composite resin to enamel. Four dentin bonding systems were included in this study: GLUMA Dentin Bond, Scotchbond, and Prisma Universal Bond 2 and 3. Eighty extracted human permanent anterior teeth were used and divided in eight test groups. The vestibular surfaces were ground and acid etched. For each dentin bonding system 10 samples were treated with dentin primer prior to placement of resin. Shear bond testing showed that enamel contact with dentin primer in the above two systems decreased the shear bond strength between composite and enamel by 31 to 44%.     

Bonding of hybrid ionomers and resin cements to modified orthodontic band materials

Orthodontic bands often fail clinically at the band-cement interface. Hybrid ionomer and resin cements and a glass ionomer control were bonded to photo-etched and standard band materials, both of which were tested in as-received and air-abraded conditions. Cements were placed in a 3 mm diameter mold at the bonding interface and bonded to 6 x 6 mm stainless steel band specimens mounted to acrylic blocks. Specimens were stored in water for 24 hours at 37 degreesC and debonded in tension on a testing machine at 0.05 cm/minutes. Bond strengths (MPa) were calculated and data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Bond strengths to as-received bands were less than 3.4 MPa for cements tested, whereas bond strengths to air-abraded bands ranged from 7.1 to 17.7 MPa, except for the glass ionomer control. Air abrasion of band materials provides highly increased bond strength of hybrid ionomer and resin cements.     

Initial tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resins on perfused primary dentin

The objective of this study was to evaluate the initial tensile bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil) and two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compoglass, Dyract) to primary dentin. A hybrid composite resin (Tetric) and two chemical cured glass ionomers (BaseLine, Hi-Dense) served as controls. Ninety caries-free dentinal discs were ground flat and perfused with Ringer's solution. Dentinal surfaces were conditioned (except for Base Line). From each material, fifteen standardized specimens were attached to the dentin. Light-curing of the respective materials followed (1 min), and adhesion was tested with a universal testing machine 15 min after application. The highest initial bond strength was observed with Tetric (5.17 MPa). Closed test procedure (Kruskal-Wallis) showed significant differences between all materials (P < 0.05), except for Compoglass (1.82 MPa) vs. Dyract (2.35 MPa), and BaseLine (0.37 MPa) vs. Photac-Fil (0.42 MPa). The condensable glass ionomer Hi-Dense revealed a mean tensile bond strength of 0.79 MPa. Adhesion of (polyacid-modified) composite resins is superior to the other tested glass ionomer materials, when applied to perfused primary dentin.     

Low-frequency ultrasound treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in an outpatient therapy

An in vitro dye leakage study was performed to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer, composite resin and glass ionomer/resin cement when used as restorative materials for G.V. Black class V cavities. In this research, standard Class V cavities were prepared in sound premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons. The cavities were randomly divided into 3 groups. After filling the cavities with glass ionomer cement, composite resin and light curing glass ionomer/resin cement, the specimens were immersed in silver nitrate solution. Marginal microleakage at the interface between the cavity wall and restoration was evaluated. The results were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Result of this in vitro study indicate that composite resin and glass ionomer/resin cement provide a better seal than glass ionomer cement.     

The effect of adhesive luting agent-dentinal surface interactions on compressive strength of two types of all-ceramic crowns

This research compared the compressive strength of two types of all-ceramic crown (Hi-Ceram and Duceram) as affected by selected luting cements (Zn phosphate, glass ionomer and composite resin cement). Thirty crowns of similar size and shape were constructed (15 crowns of each tested material) to fit a standard posterior tooth preparation. Five crowns from each material were cemented by one of the tested cements. The cemented crowns were loaded until catastrophic failure. A two-way analysis of variance was performed and showed that the type of utilized cement had a significant effect on the compressive strength being that Panevia Ex. resin cement the most effective one followed by glass ionomer and then finally zn phosphate cement. Statistical analysis also showed that Hi-Ceram crowns were more resistant to occlusal load than Duceram.     

Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets

The clinical performance of a glass ionomer cement for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets was compared with a composite resin routinely used in this procedure. Brackets were bonded, using both materials, in alternate quadrants of 16 patients of the Orthodontic Clinic of the State University of Rio de Janeiro. A total of 225 teeth, 112 in the glass ionomer cement group and 113 in the composite group, were tested. Bond failure frequencies were recorded for 12 months, and chi-square statistical test was carried out comparing the failure rates of the materials. The composite showed a statistically significant lower failure rate (7.96%) than the glass ionomer cement (50.89%), regardless of the dental arch tested. Although the glass ionomer cement presents important properties not observed in the composite, it is necessary to increase its cohesive strength to permit its clinical use for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.     

The effect of eugenol containing and non-eugenol temporary cements on the resin-enamel bond

This study was undertaken to compare the effect of eugenol containing and non-eugenol temporary cements on the bond strength of three brands of luting cements to enamel. Flat enamel surfaces were prepared on 90 surgically removed, unerupted, human third molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of thirty. The flat enamel surfaces in two of the groups were treated with either a eugenol containing or non-eugenol temporary cement and the third group was left untreated. The teeth were stored in water for 7 days and the cements then removed and all surfaces etched. The teeth were divided into 9 sub-groups of 10 each and one of the three resin cements was then bonded to each sub-group. The relevant shear bond strengths were determined after 7 days. The results indicated that prior use of a eugenol containing temporary cement reduced the resin cement-enamel bond strengths. No differences were found between the bonds achieved by the three brands. It was concluded that eugenol containing temporary cements should not be used prior to bonding with resin luting cements.     

Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements

New-generation glass-ionomer cements contain resin to improve their restorative properties. These resin-modified glass-ionomer cements vary considerably in their chemistry, which could result in corresponding variability in their physical and biological properties. This study investigated the cytotoxicity and the fluoride release of two resin-modified glass ionomers, a conventional glass-ionomer cement, and a resin composite. Samples were prepared and extracted in distilled water for 1, 4, and 7 days; eluates were filtered and tested by means of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity (MTT assay) values were low for all materials and extraction times, indicating minimal cytotoxicity of all materials (less than 30% inhibition). Cytotoxicity of one resin-modified glass ionomer was significantly higher than for the other materials (p < 0.001). One resin-modified glass ionomer and the conventional glass-ionomer cement released significantly more fluoride at each time interval (p < 0.001) than the other resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and the resin composite. Fluoride release and cytotoxicity were correlated (r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001), although the fluoride release does not account for the cytotoxicity observed. Cytotoxicity and fluoride release suggest that one hybrid behaved more like a conventional glass ionomer, and the other like a resin composite. These differences may have implications for material selection in specific clinical situations.     

Psychiatric comorbidity among hospitalized AIDS patients vs. non-AIDS patients referred for psychiatric consultation

This study evaluated the clinical performance of a new resin modified glass ionomer cement, Geristore (Den-Mat Corp., Santa Maria, Calif.), for the bonding of orthodontic brackets and its effect on certain caries-associated microorganisms. This cement has been shown to possess increased mechanical properties and long-term fluoride release. There were 716 brackets bonded in 40 patients (17 males and 23 females), with a split-mouth technique and a composite resin, Phase II (Reliance, Itasca, III.), as a control. Bond failures were recorded up to 1 year. Plaque scores and plaque samples were taken from the area of the bonding adhesive in 20 patients, before, at 1 week, and 5 months after the placement of brackets. The plaque samples were investigated for the presence of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. The overall bond failure rate was found to be 8.9% for Geristore and 3.1% for Phase II (p < 0.05). Labially, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in bond failure rate: 3.8% for Geristore and 1.7% for Phase II. The proportions of S. mutans and lactobacilli in plaque taken from around Geristore cement were reduced at 1 week and 5 months, when compared with Phase II resin, and this reduction was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 1 week. Results of this study suggest that Geristore may be of use in the labial segments, especially in caries prone patients, in whom demineralization at debond may present an esthetic and restorative problem several years after treatment.     

24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters

Clinically, orthodontists are often faced with the difficulties of bonding to porcelain crowns, veneers, or bridges. Traditional methods of dealing with this are often time-consuming and generally esthetically unacceptable to patients. Current interest involves the use of organosilane primers with or without NTG-GMA and BPDM resins to aid in chemically bonding porcelain with traditional orthodontic adhesives. This study compared the bond strength of three types of adhesion promoters: Ormco Porcelain Primer (OR) (Ormco Corp., Glendora, Calif.), All-Bond2 (AB2) (Bisco Dental Products, Inc., Itasca, Ill.), and Scotchprime Ceramic Primer (SP) (3M, St. Paul, Minn.) with two orthodontic adhesives: Phase II (Reliance, Inc., Itasca, Ill.) and Rely-a-bond (Reliance, Inc., Itasca, Ill.). Eighty ceramometal samples were fabricated and hydrated for 1 week in distilled water before bonding. Next, the samples were etched with 2.5 % HF acid for 90 seconds, rinsed and upper central incisor metal orthodontic brackets were bonded with the various primers and adhesives. After 24 hours they were sheared off with an MTS machine at at rate of 0.5 mm/min, and the bond strength was measured. The mean shear bond strengths (MPa) with Phase II were as follows; Control 0.44 (sigma = 0.22), AB2 8.40 (sigma = 3.61), OR 13.31 (sigma = 5.79), SP 13.53 (sigma = 3.34). With Rely-a-bond, the shear bond strengths were Control 0.41 (sigma = 0.67), AB2 4.34 (sigma = 1.88), OR 9.73 (sigma = 4.58), and SP 12.40 (sigma = 3.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems

This study evaluated the sealing properties of AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Z100/Scotchbond MultiPurpose, AP.H/Imperva Bond, Charisma/Denthesive, Bisfil M/All-Bond 2, resin composite/dentin adhesive systems and Fuji II LC light-cured glass ionomer, in Class V preparations following 6 months of storage in a 37 degrees C water bath. The Class V preparations extended just beyond the cemento-enamel junction of extracted human molars. The restored teeth were placed in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours and then thermally stressed for 100 temperature cycles. Half of the specimens were tested for microleakage at this time. The other specimens were returned to water storage and thermally stressed every 30 days during the following 6 months and then assessed for microleakage by dye penetration. AP.H/Imperva Bond, Z100/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Fuji II LC were not affected by the storage, while AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Charisma/Denthesive and Bisfil M/All-Bond 2 revealed some increase in microleakage at the dentin/cememtum margin.     

A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets

Glass polyalkenoate cements have the unique properties of physicochemically bonding to enamel and base metals and to leach fluoride over prolonged periods. These cements have been modified to provide a dual setting with both light activation and chemical cure to produce a more rapid set. This article reports a 12-month clinical trial of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets, compared with a standard composite bonding adhesive. There was no significant difference in failure rates of direct bonded orthodontic brackets cemented with Fuji II LC light-activated glass polyalkenoate cement (GC Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan) (3.3%) compared with System I+ composite bonding resin (Ormco Corp., Glendora, Calif.) (1.6%).     

The effect of dentin disinfectants on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dentinal disinfection with a 2% chlorhexidine or a 0.11% I2-KI/CuSO4 solution on the shear bond strength of three resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, and Vitremer. The occlusal surfaces of extracted human teeth were flattened to dentin. Specimens were randomly assigned to one of nine treatment groups (n = 12). For each glass-ionomer material, there was a control group and two treatment groups in which the dentin was treated with either a 2% chlorhexidine or a 0.11% I2-KI/CuSO4 solution before the dentin was treated with the recommended dentin conditioner prior to glass-ionomer bonding. Specimens were stored for 1 day in water, thermocycled, and tested in shear until failure. The chlorhexidine solution did not significantly affect the shear bond strengths of any of the cements, but the I2-KI/CuSO4 solution significantly lowered the bond strengths of Vitremer and Fuji II LC compared to the controls.