A consistent reference frame for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is found in different populations

This study investigated the consistency of a reference frame for ambulatory pressure monitoring, which using various approaches was determined in two different populations. The two reference groups were 718 subjects randomly selected from the population and 895 bank employees. The reference values derived in these two groups were subsequently tested in 591 untreated hypertensive patients. The ambulatory pressures equivalent to a conventional pressure of 140 mmHg systolic and 90 mmHg diastolic were calculated by regression analysis in all subjects. In addition, in subjects who were normotensive by conventional sphygmomanometry, the mean +2 and +3 standard deviations and the 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles of the ambulatory measurements were determined. The distributions of the ambulatory measurements were similar in the two reference groups and the aforementioned parameters therefore agreed within 4 mmHg in the two populations. There was considerable overlap in the ambulatory pressures between the two reference groups and the hypertensive patients. Classification of the patients according to the means +3 standard deviations and the regression limits gave the same results because in both reference groups these boundaries approximated to each other within 1 mmHg. For the 24 h pressures in the population sample these boundaries were 140 mmHg systolic and 88 mmHg diastolic. Of the patients with systolic hypertension (> or = 160 mmHg on conventional measurement), 39% had a 24 h systolic pressure of < 140 mmHg and of those with diastolic hypertension (> or = 95 mmHg), 44% had a 24 h diastolic pressure of < 88 mmHg; if the corresponding boundaries derived in the bank employees (143/90 mmHg) were applied, these proportions were 47% and 44%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with craniomandibular disorders

To assess the physiologic response to daily life stress in patients with craniomandibular disorders (CMD), office and ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were studied in 25 female patients and 25 controls. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between the groups for heart rate before the clinical examination and that in the patient group when compared before and after the clinical examination. Higher values were found for mean daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the control group compared with the patient group (p < 0.05). The mean number of systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg during 24 h and daytime was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the control group than in the patient group. In this study the CMD patients with muscular diagnosis were not more stressed than healthy subjects in the daily activities as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure measurements.     

A series of self-measurements by the patient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported overdiagnosis and overtreatment of hypertensive patients, especially in borderline hypertensives. AIM: To find a blood pressure measurement procedure that reduces the risk of misclassification to an acceptable level. METHOD: Comparative, prospective study over seven months of primary care patients with elevated initial blood pressures. Blood pressure measurements made by general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, and patients were compared with ambulatory blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients completed the study. Mean differences (systolic blood pressure) between different measurement procedures and ambulatory measurement ranged from +10 mmHg (doctor) to -1 mmHg (patient), and (diastolic) from +4 mmHg (doctor) to -2 mmHg (patient). Standard deviations of mean differences ranged from 12 mmHg (doctor/systolic) to 10 mmHg (patient/systolic), and from 8 mmHg (doctor/diastolic) to 7 mmHg (patient/diastolic). CONCLUSION: Self-measurements by the patient appear to be a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement. In diagnosing and managing mild hypertension, we recommend the use of a valid self-measuring device.     

Imaging of renal graft lymphomas. Apropos of 5 cases]

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that heavy smoking may interfere with the variation in ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension. METHODS: We compared the office and 24-hour ABP of 48 untreated hypertensive smokers (> 20 cigarettes daily) with 90 non-smoking hypertensives matched for age, sex and body mass index. ABP was recorded using fully automatic SpaceLabs 90,207 units set to take a measurement every 15 minutes during the day (7.00 a.m.-10.00 p.m.) and every 20 minutes during the night (10.00 p.m.-7.00 a.m.). Urine collection for urinary sodium, potassium, epinephrine and norepinephrine excretion was performed during the 24-hour period of ABP monitoring. Catecholamines were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The office blood pressure readings of the smoking and non-smoking groups were 156.7/103.4 and 156.5/103.9 mmHg respectively. During the day-time period, ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the smokers (146 +/- 12 vs 140.4 +/- 13 mmHg, p < 0.02; 96.4 +/- 8.15 vs 93.1 +/- 10 mmHg, p < 0.05 respectively). This difference was greater among patients under the age of 50 (145.9 +/- 13 vs 136.6 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 97.1 +/- 8.7 vs 92.3 +/- 9.9 mmHg, p < 0.02). Blood pressure during the night-time period did not differ between the two groups (130.5/81.3 vs 126.3/79.5). No differences were detected among the groups as far as urinary catecholamine excretion is concerned. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that among hypertensive subjects, smokers maintain a higher day-time ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure than non-smokers, particularly in the younger patients, even though casual blood pressure is similar.     

The difference between clinical ambulatory measured blood pressure and daily monitored pressure does not reflect the "white coat effect"

The difference between clinic and average daytime ambulatory blood pressure is frequently used to identify patients with "white coat" hypertension (i.e. with a pronounced pressor response to the clinical evaluation) although there is no evidence that this difference is indeed due to a white coat effect. In 28 mild hypertensive outpatients, the blood pressure was continuously recorded by a noninvasive finger device before and during the doctor's visit. The peak blood pressure increase, recorded during the visit was compared with the difference between clinic and daytime average ambulatory blood pressure. Peak increases in systolic and diastolic finger blood pressure during the doctor's visit were 38.2 +/- 3.1 mmHg and 20.7 +/- 1.6 mmHg, respectively compared to pre visit values (means +/- standard error, both p < 0.01). Daytime average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 135.5 +/- 2.5 mmHg and 89.2 +/- 1.9 mmHg, both being lower than the corresponding clinic blood pressure values (146.6 +/- 3.6 mmHg and 94.9 +/- 2.2 mmHg, p < 0.01). Their differences, however, were < 30% of the peak finger blood pressure increase during the physician's visit. While the physician's visit was associated with tachycardia (+9.0 +/- 1.6 b/min, p < 0.01) there was no difference between clinic and daytime average heart rate. The alerting reaction and the pressor response induced by the physician's visit is not reflected by the difference between clinic and daytime average blood pressure. Such a difference is not therefore a reliable measure of the white coat effect.     

Protective effect of GTS-21, a novel nicotinic receptor agonist, on delayed neuronal death induced by ischemia in gerbils

BACKGROUND: The difference between clinic and ambulatory average daytime blood pressures is frequently taken as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat effect' (i.e. the pressor reaction triggered in the patient by the physician's visit). OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of this difference and its relationship with clinic and average ambulatory daytime blood pressure levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: These issues were addressed with two large groups of subjects in whom both clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured, namely 783 outpatients with systolic and diastolic essential hypertension [Group 1, aged 50.8+/-9.4 years (mean +/- SD)], participating in standardized Italian trials of antihypertensive drugs, and 506 elderly patients (group 2, age 71+/-7 years) with isolated systolic hypertension, participating in the European Syst-Eur trial. RESULTS: The clinic-daytime blood pressure difference for the essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients (group 1) was 13.6+/-14.3 mmHg for systolic and 9.1+/-8.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P always < 0.01). This difference for the elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (group 2) was 21.2+/-16.0 mmHg for systolic and only 1.3+/-10.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In both studies little or no systematic clinic-daytime difference could be observed for heart rate. The reproducibility of the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference, tested for 108 essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients from group 1 and 128 isolated systolic hypertensives from group 2, was invariably lower than that both of daytime and of clinic blood pressure values. Finally, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference was progressively higher for increasing levels of clinic blood pressure and progressively lower for higher levels of ambulatory daytime blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference has a limited reproducibility; depends not only on clinic but also on daytime average blood pressure, which means that its size is a function of the blood pressure criteria employed for selection of the patients in a trial; and is never associated with a systematic clinic-daytime difference in heart rate, which further questions its use as a reliable surrogate measure of the true pressor response induced in the patient by the doctor's visit.     

Effects of amlodipine on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles, electrocardiographic monitoring, and left ventricular mass and function in black patients with very severe hypertension

In a 3-month, open-label study, 54 consecutive black patients with very severe hypertension were treated with amlodipine. Very severe hypertension was defined as an average sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 115 mmHg and < or = 140 mmHg as a mean of 10 readings over a 30-minute period using an automatic BP measuring device and a mean 24-hour diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) > or = 110 mmHg and < or = 140 mmHg). Serial changes in 24-hour ABP and electrocardiographic monitoring, left ventricular (LV) mass index, and LV systolic function were evaluated. Mean 24-hour ABP was reduced from 181 +/- 14/119 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 15/92 +/- 9 mmHg at 3 months (P < 0.0001). Target BP (mean 24-hour diastolic ABP < 90 mmHg) was achieved in 35% of the patients. The reduction in BP was sustained for 24 hours after drug administration. Simultaneous BP measurements using the automatic BP measuring device were significantly different from the ABP measurements before and after treatment, suggesting a marked "white coat" pressor effect. At baseline, frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias (> 30 ventricular extrasystoles per hour, ventricular couplets) were present in 2 (4%) patients, with no significant change after treatment. Left ventricular mass index regressed from 140 +/- 50 to 111 +/- 30 g/m2 at 3 months (P < 0.03); LV performance was not adversely affected. Adverse effects were few and tended to disappear during the treatment period. All of the clinical laboratory parameters tested remained unchanged. In this group of patients, treatment with amlodipine showed a marked and sustained antihypertensive action as demonstrated by 24-hour ABP monitoring, and was well tolerated and associated with LV mass regression without adverse effect on systolic cardiac function. Further, a low rate of complex ventricular arrhythmias was documented.     

Nutritional aspects of dissimilatory sulfate reduction in the human large intestine

Physical pain is a major trigger for changes in many homeostatic systems of the body physiology. Our aim was to study the relationship between blood pressure, metabolism and pain perception in subjects with chronic pain symptoms. This was undertaken in a population-based study in primary health care, including subjects with widespread pain (n = 16), or localized pain (n = 15), and pain-free controls (n = 14). The main outcome measures were office and ambulatory blood pressure, glucose, insulin, lipids, and beta-endorphin. Subjects with widespread pain were more obese and showed higher levels than controls (p < 0.05) of fasting glucose (4.9 vs 4.5 mmol/l), cholesterol (6.9 vs 5.8 mmol/l) and office systolic blood pressure (133 vs 120 mmHg), while the subjects reporting localized pain had values in-between. Ambulatory blood pressure, insulin and beta-endorphin levels did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, subjects with widespread and/or intense chronic pain have higher BMI, more pronounced metabolic disturbances and higher (office) systolic blood pressure, but not ambulatory blood pressure, than subjects without chronic pain. Future epidemiological studies are needed to test whether this is compatible with increased cardiovascular risk.     

Association between blood pressure and circulating hormonal factors with left ventricular mass in patients with essential hypertension older than 55 years of age

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is higher in elderly patients with hypertension than in normotensive patients. The factors relationed herewith are not well known. The first purpose was to analyse the relationship between the levels of blood pressure (BP) recorded by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in a group of untreated patients older than 55 years with essential hypertension. Our second purpose was to observe the relationship between the concentration of several circulating hormones and the left ventricular mass index. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 31 untreated patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and 37 healthy normotensives. Both groups were of similar age, sex and body mass index. We determined for both groups the casual arterial pressure (CAP), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) throughout 24 h, daytime (07.00-23.00 h), nighttime (23.00-07.00 h), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (following Devereux's formula) and circulating levels of endothelin-1, aldosterone, renine, free adrenaline and noradrenaline. RESULTS: The ILVM in hypertensive patients was 139.6 +/- 35.9 g/m2 and in 124.0 +/- 31.8 g/m2 in normotensive (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with LVH was 63 and 43%, respectively (p < 0.05). The LVMI in hypertensive patients was correlated with the diastolic CAP (97 +/- 7 mmHg) (r = 0.41; p < 0.05), unlike with the systolic CAP (164 +/- 18 mmHg). The ILVM in normotense patients was not associated neither with the systolic CAP (126 +/- 10 mmHg) nor with the diastolic (79 +/- 6 mmHg). In hypertensive patients we found a slight association between the LVMI and the systolic ABPM (130 +/- 14 mmHg) during nighttime (r = 0.41; p < 0.05). The rest of average ambulatory BP and the hormonal values at study did not show a correlation with the LVMI in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A slight correlation exists between BP (casual and determined with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring throughout 24 hours) and the left ventricular mass index in mild to moderate untrated hypertensive patients older than 55 years. We did not observe correlations between the circulating levels of endothelin-1, renin, aldosterone, free adrenaline and noradrenaline and the left ventricular mass. The average ventricular mass and the number of subjects with ventricular hypertrophy was significantly increased in hypertensives than in normotensives.     

The impact of ibuprofen on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly persons

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may alter blood pressure through their inhibitory effects on prostaglandin biosynthesis. Such potential hypertensive effects of NSAIDs have not been adequately examined in the elderly, who are the largest group of NSAID users. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover trial of ibuprofen (1800 mg per day) vs placebo treatment in patients older than 60 years of age with hypertension controlled with hydrochlorothiazide. While continuing their usual thiazide dosage, subjects were randomized to a 4-week treatment period (ibuprofen or placebo) followed by a 2-week placebo wash-out period and a second 4-week treatment period with the alternative therapy. Supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured weekly. RESULTS: Of 25 randomized subjects, 22 completed the study protocol (mean age = 73 +/- 6.7 years). Supine systolic blood pressure and standing systolic blood pressure were increased significantly with ibuprofen treatment, compared with placebo. Mean supine systolic blood pressures were 143.8 +/- 21.0 and 139.6 +/- 15.9 mmHg on ibuprofen and placebo, respectively (p = .004). Mean standing systolic blood pressures were 148.1 +/- 19.9 and 143.4 +/- 17.9 mmHg on ibuprofen and placebo, respectively (p = .002). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 1800 mg per day of ibuprofen does induce a significant increase in systolic blood pressure in older hypertensive patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide. NSAID therapy may negatively impact the control of hypertension in elderly patients.     

Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring in healthy, middle-aged smokeless tobacco users, smokers, and nontobacco users

Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring was conducted in 135 healthy, normotensive, middle-aged (35 to 60 years) men, with no antihypertensive medication, to study the influence of habitual smokeless tobacco use (n = 47) and smoking (n = 29) on diurnal blood pressure and heart rate. Comparisons were made with nonusers of tobacco (n = 59). Adjustments were made for differences in age, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, physical fitness, and alcohol intake. Daytime ambulatory heart rates were significantly (P < .05) elevated in both smokeless tobacco users and smokers compared with nonusers (69 +/- 14 and 74 +/- 13 beats/min, respectively, versus 63 +/- 12 beats/min). In subjects > or = 45 years old, ambulatory daytime diastolic blood pressures were significantly elevated, on average by 5 mm Hg, in both smokeless tobacco users and smokers (P < .001) compared with nonusers. Clinical measurements of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in smokers were significantly lower compared with the ambulatory mean values. Nighttime measurements showed only minor differences between the tobacco habit groups. The higher heart rates and blood pressures noted during the daytime in smokers and smokeless tobacco users were most likely due to the effects of nicotine. A strong positive relationship was found between cotinine (major nicotine metabolite) and blood pressure in smokeless tobacco users (systolic blood pressure, r = 0.48, P < .001; diastolic blood pressure, r = 0.41, P = .005), whereas an inverse relationship was found in smokers (systolic blood pressure, r = -0.12, P = .47; diastolic blood pressure, r = -0.03, P = .84), indicating additional and more complex influences on vascular tone in smokers than the influence of nicotine in smokeless tobacco users.     

HPLC fractionated soluble egg antigen from Schistosoma mansoni elicits a heterogeneous human immune response

Antihypertensive effects of beni-koji were studied using 29 outpatients with mild hypertension in a placebo-controlled double-blind comparative fashion. After a 4-week vehicle (apple juice) run-in period, 13 patients were assigned to receive beni-koji aqueous extracts containing juice once daily (27 g of beni-koji eq. per day) for 8 weeks and 16 were assigned to vehicle. Two patients assigned to the vehicle group did not complete the study. In addition to casual blood pressure, 24-hr non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was monitored in 6 patients given the beni-koji drink and 5 patients given the vehicle. 1) In the beni-koji group, both casual systolic and diastolic pressure decreased significantly during the treatment period (from 150 +/- 10/96 +/- 6 mmHg to 140 +/- 10/89 +/- 10 mmHg, p < 0.01). The averages of the 24-hr blood pressure recorded in ABP (24-BP) also significantly decreased (from 141 +/- 17/95 +/- 13 mmHg to 132 +/- 21/86 +/- 10 mmHg, p < 0.05) when compared with those of the control period. Casual pressure normalized (less than 140/90 mmHg) in 4 patients who received beni-koji. Circadian variation of the blood pressure by ABP showed a significant decrease during the daytime. 2) In the vehicle group, casual systolic pressure did not change significantly (from 155 +/- 8 mmHg to 151 +/- 12 mmHg), but diastolic pressure decreased significantly (98 +/- 7 mmHg to 93 +/- 6 mmHg). Casual blood pressure did not normalize in any of the patients and 24-BP did not change significantly. 3) Summative evaluation of safety showed that no problems appeared in the beni-koji group. In conclusion, beni-koji appears to be an effective and safe food material for mild essential hypertension. The mechanism of the antihypertensive effect of beni-koji still remains to be investigated.     

Effect of betaxolol on blood pressure and heart rate in mild to moderate hypertension

The efficacy and safety of daily 20 mg betaxolol monotherapy was investigated in mild-moderate essential hypertension in a four week long, open label, single blind trial (with a placebo run-in). Twenty one patients of both sexes were enrolled. The systolic blood pressure in the supine position decreased from 158 to 142 mmHg, the diastolic blood pressure from 101 to 89 mmHg. The mean systolic values of the 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring decreased from 136 to 126 mmHg, the mean diastolic values from 87 to 80 mmHg. All decreases in blood pressure were significant. The reduction of the heart rate (80/min vs 63/min) was also significant. The decrease in blood pressure during daytime was significant, during night it was moderate. The blood pressure- and heart rate reducing effect of betaxolol was detectable however in the second half of the night, before wake-up. No side effect was recorded.     

Sodium sensitivity in young adults with high resting end-tidal CO2

BACKGROUND: Previous research with normotensive adults aged over 40 years ('older') found that sensitivity of blood pressure of subjects with high resting end-tidal partial pressures of CO2 to high sodium intake was greater than normal. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the lesser sensitivity of blood pressure of young normotensive adults to high sodium intake is also a function of resting end-tidal partial pressure of CO2. DESIGN: Forty-eight Caucasian men and women (age 28.5 +/- 1.4 years) had a lower than normal dietary intake of sodium chloride for 4 days, and then ingested sodium chloride capsules for 7 days (an additional 190 mmol/day sodium chloride). Resting end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 and blood pressure, and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, were measured before and after the high-sodium diet. Overnight urine samples were collected before and after the high-sodium diet to determine dietary compliance, and to assess changes in urinary excretion of endogenous digitalis-like factors (a ouabain-like factor, and a marinobufagenin-like factor) that covary with plasma volume. RESULTS: Subjects with high end-tidal partial pressures of CO2 had lower resting heart rates and lower urinary excretion of ouabain-like factor before sodium loading. Sodium loading decreased mean partial pressure of CO2 (by 0.8 +/- 0.2 mmHg) and increased only ambulatory systolic blood pressure (by 2.1 +/- 0.8 mmHg) for the whole group. However, the changes in resting systolic (r = 0.32, P < 0.025) and diastolic (r = 0.36, P < 0.01) blood pressures and in 24 h systolic (r = 0.28, P < 0.05) blood pressure after sodium loading were all positive functions of individual resting end-tidal partial pressures of CO2. Sodium loading increased urinary excretion of marinobufagenin-like factor (by 1.78 +/- 0.88 nmol) and the magnitude of the individual increase was a function of end-tidal partial pressure of CO2. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a high resting partial pressure of CO2 augments the effects of high sodium intake on plasma volume, levels of endogenous digitalis-like factors, and blood pressure in young normotensive humans.     

Seasonal variations in home and ambulatory blood pressure in the PAMELA population. Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni

OBJECTIVE: Clinic blood pressure values are known to change according to seasonal influences. We therefore examined home and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure values to determine whether these measurements are also affected by the seasons. DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2051 subjects of the Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, we measured clinic (sphygmomanometric measurements), home (semi-automatic device) and ambulatory (Spacelabs 90207) systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. Because the overall sample was evenly distributed over each month (except August), we were able to make a cross-sectional determination of whether the values differed between seasons. The corresponding heart rates were also evaluated. RESULTS: As expected, summer was associated with the lowest clinic blood pressure and winter with the highest, and this was the case also for home and 24 h average blood pressure, although seasonal differences in the latter were less pronounced. Seasonal clinic, home and ambulatory blood pressure patterns were similar for normotensive subjects (n = 1152), untreated hypertensives (n = 540) and treated hypertensives (n = 359). Heart rate values did not differ by season. CONCLUSIONS: Seasonal influences on blood pressure are not limited to conventional measurements but characterize daily values as well. These effects are visible in both normal and elevated blood pressure values, regardless of the effect of antihypertensive drugs. This has implications both for the clinician and for studies aimed at evaluating the effects of antihypertensive treatment.     

Heavy metals in shrimp culture areas from the Gulf of Fonseca, Central America. II. Cultured shrimps

An increase in magnesium intake has been suggested to lower blood pressure (BP). However, the results of clinical studies are inconsistent. We studied the effects of magnesium supplementation on office, home, and ambulatory BPs in patients with essential hypertension. Sixty untreated or treated patients (34 men and 26 women, aged 33 to 74 years) with office BP >140/90 mm Hg were assigned to an 8-week magnesium supplementation period or an 8-week control period in a randomized crossover design. The subjects were given 20 mmol/d magnesium in the form of magnesium oxide during the intervention period. In the control period, office, home, and average 24-hour BPs (mean+/-SE) were 148.6+/-1.6/90.0+/-0.9, 136.4+/-1.3/86.8+/-0.9, and 133.7+/-1.3/81.0+/-0.8 mmHg, respectively. All of these BPs were significantly lower in the magnesium supplementation period than in the control period, although the differences were small (office, 3.7+/-1.3/1.7+/-0.7 mmHg; home, 2.0+/-0.8/1.4+/-0.6 mmHg; 24-hour, 2.5+/-1.0/1.4+/-0.6 mm Hg). Serum concentration and urinary excretion of magnesium increased significantly with magnesium supplementation. Changes in 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs were correlated negatively with baseline BP or changes in serum magnesium concentration. These results indicate that magnesium supplementation lowers BP in hypertensive subjects and this effect is greater in subjects with higher BP. Our study supports the usefulness of increasing magnesium intake as a lifestyle modification in the management of hypertension, although its antihypertensive effect may be small.     

The influence of 5-week relaxation therapy on arterial blood pressure in patients with borderline hypertension

The present study was performed to evaluate the influence of 5-week relaxation therapy on office and ambulatory blood pressure in young borderline hypertensives. Thirty patients were studied. The office blood pressure decreased significantly after 5 weeks of relaxation therapy (P < 0.001 for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure). Ambulatory monitoring revealed only a slight decrease of 24-hour blood pressure (P = 0.02). Our results indicate limited efficacy of relaxation therapy in treatment of borderline hypertensives.     

Temporal pattern of IGF-I expression during mouse preimplantation embryogenesis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of casual and exercise blood pressure as well as the importance of clinical factors on the presence and degree of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. METHODS: Fifteen normotensives (control group) and 30 hypertensives, 14 of them with and 16 without left ventricular hypertrophy (groups with LVH and without LVH, respectively) were studied. LVH diagnosis was established when mass index was higher than 2 standard-deviations of the mean values calculated for each sex in control group. Resting, casual determined, and bicycle exercise systolic and diastolic blood pressures along with age, body surface area, sex and race distribution were compared between groups. In addiction, their relation with mass index as independent variables were also tested. RESULTS: Hypertensives in group with LVH had higher diastolic septal, posterior wall, and relative wall thicknesses. No significant statistical difference was observed neither in sex and race distribution, nor in age and body surface area between groups. Otherwise, there were significant differences in both resting and exercise blood pressure. In the entire population studied, left ventricular mass index significantly correlated with age (r=0,33, p=0,03) as well as with both casual (systolic - r=0,72, p=0,0001; diastolic - r=0,69, p=0,0001) and exercise (systolic - r=0,62, p=0,0001; diastolic - r=0,66, p=0,0001) blood pressures. However, linear regression analysis demonstrated that only resting systolic (p=0,0001) and exercise diastolic (p=0,0303) blood pressures were significant and independent determinants of mass index. CONCLUSION: Resting and exercising blood pressures are the main determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension.     

Microalbuminuria in essential hypertensives in treatment for hypertension

Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) was evaluated in 26 subjects with essential hypertension and no diabetes (5 men, 21 women; 19 whites and 7 blacks), with creatinine clearance (Ccreat) > or = 75 ml/min/1.73 m2, in individualized treatment with various antihypertensive drugs. Clinical and laboratorial data were the following: mean age, 53 +/- 2 years (SEM); duration of hypertension, 14.9 +/- 2.2 years; body mass index (BMI), 26.8 +/- 0.7; arterial blood pressure, 142 +/- 4/89 +/- 3 mmHg; serum creatinine, 0.8 +/- 0.03 mg/dL; Ccreat, 99.3 +/- 3.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 and UAE, 9.3 +/- 1.5 micrograms/min. No significant difference was found when data were evaluated for gender and race. Microalbuminuria, defined as UAE > 13.9 micrograms/min, was found in 19% of the hypertensives (range: 16.3 to 28.1 micrograms/min). UAE correlated positively and significantly with systolic (r = 0.6309; P = 0.0005), diastolic (r = 0.4146; P = 0.0352), and mean blood pressure (r = 0.5000; P = 0.0093). The correlation between UAE and systolic pressure was stronger than with diastolic pressure. There was a positive and significant correlation between BMI and UAE values (r = 0.5623; P = 0.0028), and between BMI values with those of systolic (r = 0.5271; P = 0.0057) and mean blood pressure (r = 0.3930; P = 0.470). No correlation was found between UAE and age, duration of hypertension or Ccreat. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were significantly higher in microalbuminuric than in non microalbuminuric hypertensives. Obese hypertensives presented higher mean values of UAE, systolic, diastolic and mean pressures than non obese.     

Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients

Continuous non-invasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurements were compared to invasive radial artery pressure recordings in 26 patients with cardiac, vascular and/or pulmonary disease. Patients were studied during general anaesthesia (n = 6), regional anaesthesia (n = 10), or combined technique (n = 10) for abdominal or transurethral surgery. CNBP was obtained from a cuff placed around the upper arm and simultaneously compared to invasive pressure from the ipsilateral radial artery. A CNBP device (7001 Cortronic) used intermittent oscillometric measurement for calibration. Through a cuff continuously inflated to a pressure of 20 mmHg, a microprocessor-controlled electro-pneumatic acquisition system sensed displacements of the brachial artery wall. Amplified, digitally converted, filtered and transformed data were displayed as a continuous pulse pressure waveform and digital pressure values on the screen. The CNBP method functioned without disturbances before surgery in all patients. Intra-operative use of electrocautery or a spontaneous occurrence of warning on the screen repeatedly triggered oscillometric recalibration, hence CNBP measurements were discontinued in nine patients. Coefficients of correlation (r) of all invasive and CNBP pairs (n = 1111) were 0.68, 0.58 and 0.70 for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures, respectively. Prediction errors (bias, mean +/- SD) were -13.6 +/- 22.5 mmHg (on average CNBP < invasive pressure) for systolic, +13.0 +/- 12.4 mmHg (CNBP > invasive pressure) for diastolic and +5.0 +/- 13.9 mmHg (CNBP > invasive pressure) for mean CNBP, as compared to radial artery pressure values. Absolute errors (precision) were 25.3 +/- 9.4 mmHg for systolic, 17.4 +/- 4.5 mmHg for diastolic, and 13.9 +/- 4.6 mmHg for mean CNBP. During anaesthesia induction (n = 672) the difference between consecutive measurements (trend of pressure changes) with invasive and CNBP method exceeded 20 mmHg in 90 (13.3%) instances for systolic, in 33 (4.9%) instances for diastolic, and in 45 (6.6%) instances for mean blood pressure. In conclusion, the CNBP method by brachial artery wall displacement failed to measure the blood pressure reliably and to display the trend of pressure changes correctly during anaesthesia induction. In its present form this CNBP method should not replace invasive blood pressure monitoring in high-risk patients neither for anaesthesia induction nor during non-thoracic surgical procedures.