New England eye care survey

Amalgambond Plus with a high-performance additive was evaluated for its ability to bond a resin composite or an amalgam alloy to deep dentin in primary teeth with nonretentive cavity preparations. The clinical performance of amalgam and resin composite mesio-occlusodistal restorations bonded with Amalgambond Plus was evaluated at 15 months and 2 and 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the retention, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and post-operative sensitivity over the times of the evaluation or between amalgam and resin composite restorations. After 3 years, most of the teeth were extracted because it was their exfoliation time, and 29 restorations limited within buccal and lingual cusps were evaluated for marginal leakage. There were no significant differences in microleakage between amalgam and resin composite restorations lined with Amalgambond Plus. Amalgambond Plus has the potential for serving successfully as a cavity liner with either amalgam or resin composite restorations.     

Microleakage of dentin bonding systems used with spherical and admixed amalgams

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the dentin bonding systems (DBS) Tenure, Syntac, Amalgambond and All-Bond 2 using a resin-lined amalgam technique in preventing short-term microleakage in Class V cavity preparations restored with a spherical and an admixed alloy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V cavity preparations were made on the mesial and distal surfaces of non-carious human mandibular molars with the occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in cementum. Prepared teeth were randomly assigned to 12 treatment groups (n = 10) consisting of each DBS, no liner and Copalite for both amalgam alloys. Samples were thermocycled, stained and sectioned to evaluate microleakage. RESULTS: The DBS-lined restorations had significantly less microleakage at both occlusal and gingival margins than the Copalite and unlined restorations. Among DBS, Syntac had significantly more microleakage with both alloys than either All-Bond 2 or Amalgambond. These results do not totally correlate to a previous study which used the same experimental design but included viscous liners in addition to the same DBS, indicating a potential difference between resin-lined versus resin-bonded amalgam techniques in preventing microleakage.     

Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2

PURPOSE: To evaluate a dental adhesive system that uses a single conditioning/primer agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five flat enamel and dentin bonding sites were prepared to 600 grit on human molar teeth. The Clearfil Liner Bond 2 adhesive system was used to bond Clearfil AP-X composite to both enamel and dentin. After 24 hours of water storage, shear bond strengths were determined using an Instron testing machine. Fifty V-shaped cavity preparations were prepared in human molar teeth with an enamel and cementum margin. Composite restorations were placed using the new adhesive system. The teeth were stored for 24 hours, thermocycled, stained with AgNO3 , sectioned and examined for microleakage. SEM examinations were also completed to evaluate the effects of the treatment steps on enamel and dentin surfaces. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strengths for the experimental adhesive to enamel and dentin were 28.2 +/- 4.9 and 19.4 +/- 3.1 MPa. A t-test revealed that the enamel bond strength was significantly greater (P<0.05) than the dentin strength. No marginal leakage was observed from the enamel margins of the restorations. Three restorations showed minimal leakage from the cementum margins. SEM examinations showed resin penetration into both the conditioned enamel and dentin surfaces. The adhesive system produced high bond strengths to both enamel and dentin, exhibited very minimal microleakage and was easy to use.     

Influence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems

Although variation in finishing techniques has been shown to affect microleakage, little research has been published on the influence of finishing time on the marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of finishing time on the enamel and dentine marginal sealing ability of four new generation composite systems. Two class V preparations, which were solely in enamel or dentine, were made on the buccal surfaces of 96 freshly extracted molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 24 and restored with composite resin (Silux Plus) utilizing the following bonding systems: Scotchbond Multi-purpose, Fuji Bond LC, Prime & Bond 2.0 and Bisco One-step. Half of the restorations in each group were finished immediately after light polymerization and stored for 1 week. For the remaining restorations, finishing was delayed for 1 week. The storage medium was isotonic saline at 37 degrees C throughout the experiment. All restorations were then thermocycled, subjected to dye penetration testing, sectioned and scored. The results suggest that the finishing of composite restorations, bonded with the bonding systems evaluated, should be carried out immediately after light polymerization. Delayed finishing does not improve but instead can be detrimental to the marginal seal of the restorations. The effects of delayed finishing are, however, both bonding system and tissue specific.     

Optometric record keeping in a comprehensive health care environment

We determined the relative shear bond strength (SBS) to dentine and cementum and the microleakage of All-Bond 2 universal dental adhesive and OptiBond multi-use filled adhesive. We found that for both systems the SBS increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 15 minutes to 24 hours and 7 days, but there was a slight significant (p < 0.001) weakening towards 30 days. At each time point the shear bond strength of All-Bond 2 and OptiBond were also compared and it was found that OptiBond had significantly higher values (p < 0.05) at all times except at 15 minutes. Optibond also had the lower value for the microleakage (p < 0.001). This study showed that OptiBond had significantly higher shear bond strengths to and lower microleakage in dentine which may increase the longevity of the material in the clinical situation.     

Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth

The objective of this study was twofold: to evaluate the microleakage behavior of three dentin bonding systems and to determine if bovine teeth are comparable substrates to human teeth when studying the microleakage of various materials. The materials evaluated were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Prisma Universal Bond 3, and All-Bond 2. All three bonding systems were used in combination with Prisma APH hybrid composite for comparison of microleakage behavior. Sixty class 5 preparations were cut at the cementoenamel junction for groups containing 30 human and 30 bovine teeth. A 1 mm 45 degree bevel was placed at the enamel margin. Teeth were grouped according to the dentin bonding system used and then restored according to the manufacturer's directions. After restoration, the teeth from each group were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. The teeth were then thermocycled between 4 degrees C and 58 degrees C for 100 cycles and returned to distilled water at 37 degrees C for an additional 4 days. The teeth were then sealed with nail polish up to 1 mm from the margins of the restoration and placed in 45Ca isotope for 2 hours. The teeth were then sectioned and placed on x-ray film to produce autoradiographs. Microleakage was evaluated for the enamel and dentin margins separately using the following scale: 0 = no leakage, 1 = penetration of isotope to less than 1/2 the distance to the axial wall, 2 = penetration of isotope greater than 1/2 of the distance to the axial wall but short of the axial wall, and 3 = penetration of isotope to the axial wall or beyond. The materials were compared to each other using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The gingival margins were compared to the incisal margins for all materials. No statistically significant differences in microleakage were revealed between the incisal and gingival location for human substrates, but there was statistically significant greater gingival microleakage for bovine substrates. All-Bond 2 leaked significantly more than Scotchbond Multi-Purpose for human substrates at the incisal margin. All-Bond 2 had significantly more microleakage than Prisma Universal Bond 3 at both dentin and enamel margins for the bovine substrate. There were no statistically significant differences in microleakage among the bonding systems for the human substrate. No statistically significant differences between the microleakage behavior of human and bovine substrates were found. These results support the use of bovine teeth for in vitro microleakage studies.     

Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems

This study evaluated the sealing properties of AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Z100/Scotchbond MultiPurpose, AP.H/Imperva Bond, Charisma/Denthesive, Bisfil M/All-Bond 2, resin composite/dentin adhesive systems and Fuji II LC light-cured glass ionomer, in Class V preparations following 6 months of storage in a 37 degrees C water bath. The Class V preparations extended just beyond the cemento-enamel junction of extracted human molars. The restored teeth were placed in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours and then thermally stressed for 100 temperature cycles. Half of the specimens were tested for microleakage at this time. The other specimens were returned to water storage and thermally stressed every 30 days during the following 6 months and then assessed for microleakage by dye penetration. AP.H/Imperva Bond, Z100/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Fuji II LC were not affected by the storage, while AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Charisma/Denthesive and Bisfil M/All-Bond 2 revealed some increase in microleakage at the dentin/cememtum margin.     

The effect of dentin primer on the tensile bond strength to human enamel

Four third-generation dentin bonding products (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Optibond, All-Bond 2, and Prisma Universal Bond 3) were tested to evaluate their tensile bond strength to enamel. Test enamel specimens were etched, primed, and polymerized according to each manufacturer's directions. Control specimens were treated identically except the primer application was eliminated. The results demonstrated that the dentin primer significantly increased the tensile bond strength of All-Bond 2, significantly decreased the tensile bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Optibond, and had no significant effect for Prisma Universal Bond 3. A one-way analysis of variance was run between the eight groups tested, and three significant subsets were found (P < .05). The subset with the highest mean tensile bond strengths consisted of Prisma Universal Bond 3 primed and nonprimed, All-Bond 2 primed, and Optibond nonprimed.     

The use of a new strain of Vibrio cholerae O139 as a producer of an enteric chemical vaccine

Amalgam remains unchallenged as a posterior restorative material. But its inability to bond to the teeth leads to some amount of microleakage at the restoration-tooth interface with associated problems such as post operative sensitivity, pulpal complications etc. Also a broken amalgam restoration requires replacement which will further weaken the tooth structure. Recently, 4-META has been introduced which can graft amalgam and composite to enamel, dentin and old amalgam restorations. In this study, the bonding and marginal sealing abilities of 4-META was assessed both at the tooth-amalgam interface and old amalgam fresh amalgam interface.     

Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strengths

This in vitro study evaluated the effects of etchant type, surface moisture, and resin composite type on the shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. Three adhesives which bond to etched dentin were used in the study: All-Bond 2, Amalgambond, and Clearfil Photo Bond. Occlusal enamel was removed from 200 human molars to expose dentin. The dentin surfaces were etched, treated with a dentin adhesive system, and bonded with resin composite. After thermocycling and storage, the composite columns were fractured from dentin using an Instron machine. Bond strengths were calculated and subjected to a statistical analysis. Etchant type, surface moisture, and resin composite type all had significant effects on dentin bond strengths. Overall, the highest bond strengths were obtained with 10/3 etchant, moist dentin, and hybrid composite. The highest bond strengths for All-Bond 2 and Amalgambond were obtained by using the manufacturer's recommended etchant, moist dentin, and a hybrid composite. The mean bond strengths for All-Bond and Amalgambond under these conditions were 22.5 and 19.0 MPa, respectively. Clearfil Photo Bond had significantly lower bond strengths, but was relatively unaffected by changes in experimental conditions.     

A new thromboxane receptor antagonist, Z-335, ameliorates experimental thrombosis without prolonging the rat tail bleeding time

In an in vitro study, the use of sealers and liners (Fuji varnish, Vitrabond, Vitremer, Paama 2, All-Bond 2, or Resinomer) significantly reduced the amount of marginal leakage around amalgam (Permite C or Lojic Plus) and gallium (Galloy) alloy restorations. This reduction in marginal leakage was produced by all sealers and liners tested, and there were no statistically significant differences between these materials. Unlined restorations of Permite C had significantly less marginal leakage than Galloy or Lojic Plus. Unlined Lojic Plus restorations had the greatest amount of marginal leakage. The experimental method used in the present study proved to be suitable for quantitative comparison of marginal leakage of different dental materials.     

Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength to enamel and dentine of two resin modified glass ionomers (Fuji Bond L.C. and Vitrebond) and two resin based adhesives (Prime&Bond 2.1 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose). METHODS: A total of 120 bond sites were prepared on either enamel (n = 60) or dentine (n = 60) on human molars by grinding the teeth flat with a 600 grit sandpaper. Each tooth substrate group was divided into four groups (n = 15) to match each material. Each of the four material systems was applied, according to the manufacturers instructions, to the bond sites. On top of the placed material, a microfilled composite was placed in a 2.5 mm diameter matrix and light-cured for 40 s. All specimens were thermocycled 500 times (5-55 degrees C). Shear bond strength values were determined 120 h after bonding using a Zwick testing machine. One-way ANOVA was used to determine whether significant differences (p < 0.05) existed among the material groups on enamel and dentine. Pairwise comparisons were used to determine significant differences (p < 0.05) among the four products. RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed strong significant differences on enamel (p = 0.0001) and dentine (p = 0.0172). The enamel bond strength values of the two resin based adhesives were significantly higher than one of the resin modified glass ionomers (Vitrebond), while the other resin modified glass ionomers did not differ from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. On dentine, however, Vitrebond performed significantly better than the two resin based adhesives. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated resin modified glass ionomers bonded better to dentine surfaces than to enamel surfaces, while the investigated resin based adhesive systems bonded better to enamel than to dentine.     

Marginal adaptation of resin in relation to application technique and use of a dental adhesive system

Class V abrasion, erosion and caries lesions restored with composite resin seem to be more susceptible to microleakage, because the gingival margin is usually placed in cementum and/or dentine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage, in vitro, of a dentinal bonding system using a technique of restoration with a positive and a negative control. This study was accomplished using extracted human teeth and dye penetration technique. The teeth were examined for microleakage after one month. It was concluded that in the gingival wall of the cavity microleakage was significantly reduced when the dentinal bonding agent and composite resin was placed and polymerized incrementally from enamel, to cementum.     

Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations

OBJECTIVES: Until recently, esthetic inlay restorations in posterior teeth have been limited to cavities surrounded by enamel. Dentin adhesive systems in combination with luting composites and light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements offer a possibility for bonding ceramic inlays to cavities when the cervical margin is in dentin. This study was designed to compare in vitro marginal integrity of ceramic inlays bonded to dentin to restorations placed in cavities with margins located entirely in the enamel. METHODS: In the present in vitro study, the sealing abilities of a dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement, Vivadent) and resin-modified glass ionomers (Photac Fil, Photac Bond, ESPE; Dyract, De Trey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Industrial Corp.; and Vitremer, 3M Dental Products) used as luting agents in cavities extending beyond the cemento-enamel junction, were compared to the sealing abilities of a conventional luting composite (Vita Cerec Duo Cement, Vita) in cavities within sound enamel. SEM analysis and dye penetration were performed to evaluate marginal integrity at the cervical cavity margins. RESULTS: The dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement) rendered a marginal seal within the dentin similar to the quality obtained with the conventional luting procedures within sound enamel. When three out of the five resin-modified glass ionomers were used as luting agents (Dyract, Fuji II LC and Vitremer), the results were comparable to those reported for the dentin bonding agents and the conventional method. SIGNIFICANCE: Light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements may be considered as an alternative to dentin bonding agents when the cavity margins of ceramic inlay restorations are within the dentin. However, further studies, e.g., wear resistance, must be performed.     

The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage

OBJECTIVE: Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations may lead to secondary caries and pulpal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect various cavity liners might have on microleakage. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations with margins on enamel and dentin were treated with different liner materials (an adhesive system, a topical fluoride gel, a cavity varnish, and a glass-ionomer cement) in vitro. Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermocycling in a stained solution and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. RESULTS: On enamel, the control group (no liner) and the glass-ionomer-lined group had equivalent leakage scores and were superior to every other group. On dentin, only the glass-ionomer specimens had superior performance. The cavity varnish and fluoride-lined specimens exhibited the highest leakage scores. CONCLUSION: The use of liners does not reduce microleakage on amalgam restorations when the cavity margins remain on enamel. On dentin margins, a glass-ionomer liner can reduce microleakage.     

Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems

PURPOSE: To measure and compare the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations using the following three pairs of multi- and simplified-step dentin bonding systems (DBS): OptiBond vs. OptiBond FL, All-Bond 2 vs. One-Step, and Tenure vs. Tenure Quik. MATERIALS AND METHODS: V-shaped cavities were prepared in the mesial and distal surfaces of 30 extracted human mandibular molars with margins in both enamel and cementum, and randomly assigned into three equal groups of 10 each. All DBSs were applied strictly following manufacturers' specifications before three incremental layers of resin composite (Pertac-Hybrid) were applied in all cavities. Specimens were stored for 7 days in 37 degrees C water, thermocycled for 300 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours, and embedded in resin before being sectioned longitudinally in multiple sections. Dye solution penetration at the tooth/composite interface was scored from 0 to 4 under a microscope at x100 at both enamel (E) and cementum (C) margins. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: OptiBond FL and One-Step showed less microleakage at the cementum margins compared to their multi-step versions. At the enamel margins Tenure Quik showed less microleakage compared to Tenure, and none of the other DBSs tested showed significant dye penetration at that interface. All DBSs showed significantly less microleakage at the enamel margins compared to the cementum margins except for OptiBond FL and One-Step that did not show any significant dye penetration at the cementum margins as well.     

Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo

INTRODUCTION: Problems that may arise in resin composite Class 2 restorations include microleakage and postoperative sensitivity. However, limited in-vivo research is conducted to evaluate these processes. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess postoperative sensitivity, microleakage and the pooling of adhesives in relation to Class 2 box-type composite restorations placed in vivo using various adhesive systems and application techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four Class 2 box restorations were placed in the mesial and distal surfaces of 72 premolar teeth in-vivo using one of three combinations of adhesive systems and three filling techniques. After 6 weeks of clinical service postoperative sensitivity was recorded. The teeth were then extracted, immersed in a dye solution and sectioned. Microleakage and pooling of the adhesive was recorded. Statistical analysis involved logistic regression and chi2 tests to identify differences between groups at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 144 restorations, 65 showed minimal cervical leakage in enamel, 5 suffered leakage into dentin and 74 were free of microleakage. No statistically significant differences were found in cervical microleakage between the adhesive systems or between filling procedures. Occlusal microleakage in the enamel was present in 16 of the 160 restorations. Liner Bond 2 restorations leaked significantly more at the occlusal surface (p < 0.05). Pooling of the adhesive was significantly less when PhotoBond was used. No spontaneous postoperative sensitivity was reported. Twenty-eight restorations were sensitive to loading. Postoperative sensitivity was significantly less in patients with Liner Bond 2 restorations. CONCLUSIONS: The adhesive systems used in this study showed minimal leakage into dentin in vivo. Using Liner Bond 2, restorations exhibited more occlusal leakage but were significantly less sensitive to loading.     

Repair of Cerec porcelain with seven different systems

Intra-oral repair of fractured porcelain is a challenging clinical necessity, because time, economics, as well as possible trauma to teeth, often contra-indicate replacement of the original restoration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of seven different porcelain repair systems used in combination with Cerec Vitablocs Mark II porcelain. The systems were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), All-Bond 2 (AB), Optibond (OB), C&B Metabond (CB), Imperva Bond (IB), Silistor (S) and Mirage Bond (MB). When Mirage Bond was used, the porcelain was either etched with 9.6 percent hydrofluoric acid for 2 min (10 specimens = MB1) or with 4 percent APF gel for 2 min (10 specimens = MB2). The shear bond strengths (SBS) of all the products were determined using an Instron. The effects of the pretreatments on the porcelain with different systems were also examined in a SEM. Data were statistically analysed (Wilcoxon Sum of Rank Test). The mean SBS (MPa) of the products were: SMP = 22.6 +/- 6.5; AB = 17.1 +/- 4.1; OB = 17.1 +/- 2.3; CB = 25.8 +/- 4.2; IB = 18.3 +/- 5.2; S = 16.4 +/- 3.7; MB1 = 13.1 +/- 3.9 and MB2 = 6 +/- 2.1. CB and SMP were significantly stronger (p < 0.05) than all other products, with MB2 statistically weaker (p < 0.01) than the other groups. Most specimens showed cohesive fractures in the porcelain, except when MB was used with 4 percent APF gel, where all samples fractured at the adhesive interface. It can be concluded that all seven systems can be used to repair Cerec Porcelain, except possibly MB when used in conjunction with 4 percent APF etchant.     

Effects of argon laser curing on dentin shear bond strengths

Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of the argon laser to polymerize light-activated materials and improve enamel shear bond strengths. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the argon laser on dentin shear bond strengths of current dentin bonding systems. Argon laser (HGM Model 8) at 231 and 280 mW, 5 sec bonding agent, 10 sec composite, and a conventional curing light (Translux EC/Kulzer) at 10 sec bonding agent, 20 sec composite were used to polymerize samples of dentin bonding systems [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (3M) and Prime Bond (Dentsply/Caulk), both with TPH (Dentsply/Caulk) composite]. A flat dentin bonding site (600 grit) was prepared on the buccal surface of extracted human teeth. Twelve samples were made for each set of parameters for both laser and conventional light totaling 48 samples. Samples were stored in distilled water in light-proof containers for 24 h at 37 degrees C. Shear bond strengths (MPa) were determined for each sample on the Instron testing machine. Mean values were calculated for each set of data and ANOVA with Fisher PLSD were used for statistical analysis. The argon laser provided bond strengths that were 21-24% greater than those of the conventional curing light system.     

Bond strength to crown and root dentin

PURPOSE: To investigate (1) the tensile bond strengths of four commercial dentin bonding systems to bovine crown and root dentin and (2) the structure of the hybrid layers for each system bonded to the two dentin substrates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Superficial surfaces were exposed in bovine crown and root dentin. The teeth were embedded in plaster and a 3 mm diameter bonding area was demarcated. The four bonding systems used were All-Bond 2, Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, Clearfil Liner Bond II, and ProBond. Bonding procedures followed the manufacturers' instructions with the exception of Super-Bond D-Liner Plus where the primer was left in situ for 60 seconds. Tensile bond strengths were tested after 24-hour storage in 37 degrees C deionized water. Specimens were also prepared for SEM observation of the hybrid layer, after treatment with 10% phosphoric acid, and 10% phosphoric acid and 5% sodium hypochlorite. RESULTS: Statistically lower bond strengths to crown dentin when compared with root dentin were observed for All-Bond 2, whereas Liner Bond II showed the opposite (P < 0.01). Both ProBond and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus showed no statistical differences between crown and root dentin (P > 0.05). Hybrid layers could be observed for All-Bond 2, Liner Bond II and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, with no apparent differences between the hybrid layers of crown and root dentin. In the case of ProBond, where the smear layer was not removed during the priming stage, it appeared that the primer had infiltrated and caused hybridization of the smear layer. The differences in bond strength were thought to be related to the different bonding mechanisms of each material, as well as possible variations in the crown and root dentin substrates.