Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations

OBJECTIVES: Until recently, esthetic inlay restorations in posterior teeth have been limited to cavities surrounded by enamel. Dentin adhesive systems in combination with luting composites and light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements offer a possibility for bonding ceramic inlays to cavities when the cervical margin is in dentin. This study was designed to compare in vitro marginal integrity of ceramic inlays bonded to dentin to restorations placed in cavities with margins located entirely in the enamel. METHODS: In the present in vitro study, the sealing abilities of a dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement, Vivadent) and resin-modified glass ionomers (Photac Fil, Photac Bond, ESPE; Dyract, De Trey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Industrial Corp.; and Vitremer, 3M Dental Products) used as luting agents in cavities extending beyond the cemento-enamel junction, were compared to the sealing abilities of a conventional luting composite (Vita Cerec Duo Cement, Vita) in cavities within sound enamel. SEM analysis and dye penetration were performed to evaluate marginal integrity at the cervical cavity margins. RESULTS: The dentin bonding agent/luting composite combination (Syntac/Dual Cement) rendered a marginal seal within the dentin similar to the quality obtained with the conventional luting procedures within sound enamel. When three out of the five resin-modified glass ionomers were used as luting agents (Dyract, Fuji II LC and Vitremer), the results were comparable to those reported for the dentin bonding agents and the conventional method. SIGNIFICANCE: Light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements may be considered as an alternative to dentin bonding agents when the cavity margins of ceramic inlay restorations are within the dentin. However, further studies, e.g., wear resistance, must be performed.     

Initial tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resins on perfused primary dentin

The objective of this study was to evaluate the initial tensile bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil) and two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compoglass, Dyract) to primary dentin. A hybrid composite resin (Tetric) and two chemical cured glass ionomers (BaseLine, Hi-Dense) served as controls. Ninety caries-free dentinal discs were ground flat and perfused with Ringer's solution. Dentinal surfaces were conditioned (except for Base Line). From each material, fifteen standardized specimens were attached to the dentin. Light-curing of the respective materials followed (1 min), and adhesion was tested with a universal testing machine 15 min after application. The highest initial bond strength was observed with Tetric (5.17 MPa). Closed test procedure (Kruskal-Wallis) showed significant differences between all materials (P < 0.05), except for Compoglass (1.82 MPa) vs. Dyract (2.35 MPa), and BaseLine (0.37 MPa) vs. Photac-Fil (0.42 MPa). The condensable glass ionomer Hi-Dense revealed a mean tensile bond strength of 0.79 MPa. Adhesion of (polyacid-modified) composite resins is superior to the other tested glass ionomer materials, when applied to perfused primary dentin.     

Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities

PURPOSE: To investigate the marginal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer cements in dentin cavities placed with or without additional application of resin bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three resin-modified materials (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, Vitremer), one compomer (Dyract) and as reference an adhesively bonded resin composite system (Gluma CPS-Pekafill) were used. Flat peripheral dentin surfaces on human molar teeth were produced by wet grinding on SiC paper. Cylindrical cavities, 3.5 mm wide, were prepared in these dentin areas and restored with the individual materials. Sixty cavities were pretreated and restored as requested by the respective manufacturers. Following water storage of the specimens for 15 minutes or 24 hours, excess was gently removed by wet grinding for microscopic inspection of the marginal area. Additionally, in 30 cavities an experimental one-component adhesive resin system, a proprietary dimethacrylate and HEMA mixture dissolved in acetone, was combined with each of the restoratives for evaluation after 15-minutes water storage. Finally, in six cavities each, Dyract was combined with Prime and Bond 2.0, and Vitremer with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus for assessment after 15 minutes. Maximum marginal gap widths (MGW) were measured. One-way ANOVA by ranks (Kruskal-Wallis-Test) followed by Wilcoxon's Two-Sample test were used to study the statistical difference of MGW among the treatment groups at a rejection level P = 0.05. RESULTS: Neither the conventionally placed material systems nor the restorations in combination with adhesives showed consistently gap-free margins after 15-minute water storage. After 24-hour storage with Vitremer 4 of the 6 restorations were gap-free, whereas with all other materials only perfect margins were registered. There was, however, no significant difference between the groups. Application of the experimental and/or the specific resin bonding agents had no effect on early MGW except for the Photac-Fil group, which was significantly reduced.     

Interstitial pneumonitis detected by bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy in adult-onset Still''s disease]

The pattern of water uptake into a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer), Dyract (D), was assessed using gravimetric analysis and tritiated water absorption. The results were compared with a resin composite, Herculite (H), a resin-modified glass-ionomer, Fuji II LC (FL), and a conventional glass-ionomer, Fuji II (F). Samples were stored in tritiated water for periods varying between 6 h and 6 months. The resulting change in gravimetric weight and dimensions was recorded. The tritiated water content was then assessed using liquid scintillation counting and this was compared to the gravimetric changes. The inherent water content of each material was also established. D and H showed a slow steady net uptake to 3% and 1.3% weight by volume (WV) respectively at 6 months. FL showed a rapid uptake reaching 8.9% WV at 7 days and 9.3% WV at 6 months. F showed a steady, less dramatic water uptake reaching 5.3% WV by 6 months. For the glass-ionomer materials, values for gravimetric water uptake and tritium release differed due to the ongoing acid base reaction and an increase in firmly bound water. This phenomenon was noted in D suggesting evidence of a similar reaction in this material.     

The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent caries is one of the most common reasons for the replacement of restorations. One method of reducing the frequency of this problem may be by using fluoride-releasing restorative materials. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the progression of artificial lesions around resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) restorations placed in root surfaces. Class V cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of 28 human premolar teeth. Artificial carious wall lesions were created in all cavities. The root of each tooth was then hemisected through the middle of the two cavities, before being restored with either the glass ionomer or amalgam, while the opposing cavities on the same root portion were varnished as negative controls. Forty-eight specimens were pH-cycled in remineralising and demineralising solutions for 20 h and 4 h, respectively, each day for 4 weeks, whilst in a smaller control group of eight specimens, the demineralising solution was replaced with deionised water. Mineral changes in the carious lesions were evaluated using contact microradiography. RESULTS: Results showed that varying degrees of subsurface demineralisation and remineralisation were evident, with a laminated appearance in lesions adjacent to the glass ionomer. There was higher remineralisation in the glass ionomer-filled cavities compared with the amalgam-filled cavities. In the water-cycled group, glass ionomer showed an increase in mineral content (p < 0.05), while no changes were observed in the amalgam-filled cavities. CONCLUSIONS: This model has shown that glass ionomer has a greater potential than amalgam for remineralisation of artificially created wall lesions within an acidic environment.     

A procedure for preparing undecalcified and unembedded bone sections for light microscopy

Recently, new restoratives, such as resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified resin composites (PMC) were introduced for class III and class V cavities. Both materials use simplified cavity conditioning methods. The well-established treatment of enamel with phosphoric acid has been replaced with treatment using weaker acids. The purpose of this study was to investigate in vivo the quality and durability of the marginal bond to enamel of these restorative system and compare it with a resin composite restorative, Seventeen patients received class III restorations of each of the three restoratives. At baseline and after 1 year replica impressions were made for investigation of the vestibular margins with the scanning electron microscope. Semi-quantitative analysis of the enamel-restorative interfaces was performed at x200 and x1000 magnifications. The three restorative systems showed good marginal adaptation and high percentages of the length of the margins investigated at baseline were gap-free (82%-92%). The resin composite showed significantly better adaptation than the other materials. The marginal quality decreased significantly after 1 year for the resin composite and the polyacid-modified resin composite. The RMGIC showed improved sealing after 1 year in vivo, probably due to continuing water uptake. The percentages of gap-free margins of the total marginal length observed at 1 year were 73%, 90%, and 84%, respectively, for the PMC, the RMGIC and the resin composite. The difference between the PMC and the RMGIC was significant. In conclusion, a good marginal quality was seen for all three restorative systems in class III cavities after a period of 1 year.     

Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy

The tooth interface with resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RM GICs) is poorly understood. This study examined the interface, especially with dentin. Cervical cavities in extracted teeth were restored with Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, or a conventional GIC, Fuji Cap II. Fluorescent dye was placed in the pulp chambers for 3 hrs before the specimens were sectioned. Examination of the tooth/material interface with a confocal microscope showed that dye uptake by the restoration varied among materials. A "structureless", non-particulate, highly-stained layer of GIC was observed next to dentin in Fuji II LC. This layer varied in width, was prominent where the dentin tubules were cut "end-on" and in areas closer to the pulp, and was not seen adjacent to enamel. Vitremer showed minimal dye uptake, and the "structureless" layer was barely discernible. Photac-Fil showed more uniform uptake and absence of this layer. Cracking of enamel was also noted with these materials. The conventional GIC did not show any dye uptake, presence of a "structureless" layer, or enamel cracking. We elucidated the potential mechanisms involved in the formation of a "structureless" interfacial layer in Fuji II LC by studying the variables of cavity design, surface pre-treatment, water content of the tooth, time for it to develop, early finishing, and coating of the restoration. This layer, the "absorption layer", is probably related to water flux within the maturing cement, depending on environmental moisture changes and communication with the pulp in a wet tooth. The "micropermeability model" was useful in this study of the interfacial characteristics of RM GICs.     

A case of tracheal obstruction during oesophageal removal of a foreign body

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of mixing techniques (hand-mixing vs. trituration) on fluoride release from chemically-cured (Fuji II) and resin-modified (Fuji II LC) glass ionomer products. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluoride measurements were determined and comparisons made between hand-mixed-type materials that were both hand-mixed (60 seconds) and triturated (10 seconds). Hand-mixed specimens were made using the manufacturer's recommended powder/liquid ratio. Triturated specimens of the same material were made using the same powder/liquid ratio. Disk specimens (8.5 mm diameter, 2 mm thickness; n = 6) were stored in deionized water for 23 hours to obtain Day 1 solutions. Solutions were also obtained at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after fabrication and were changed 24 hours before fluoride concentration was determined using a fluoride ion selective electrode. Daily rates of fluoride release and 28-day cumulative fluoride totals were calculated. Cumulative data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Scheffé's test (alpha = 0.05). Daily results were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between materials (P < 0.001). Depending on the kind of material used, the method of manipulation affected the fluoride release. Data analysis revealed that: (1) Fuji II LC released significantly more fluoride than Fuji II for both triturated (P = 0.005) and hand-mixed (P < 0.005); (2) the triturated Fuji II released significantly more fluoride than the hand-mixed (P = 0.02); and (3) the hand-mixed Fuji II LC released more fluoride than the triturated, but was not statistically significant (P = 0.16).     

The effect of dentin disinfectants on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dentinal disinfection with a 2% chlorhexidine or a 0.11% I2-KI/CuSO4 solution on the shear bond strength of three resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, and Vitremer. The occlusal surfaces of extracted human teeth were flattened to dentin. Specimens were randomly assigned to one of nine treatment groups (n = 12). For each glass-ionomer material, there was a control group and two treatment groups in which the dentin was treated with either a 2% chlorhexidine or a 0.11% I2-KI/CuSO4 solution before the dentin was treated with the recommended dentin conditioner prior to glass-ionomer bonding. Specimens were stored for 1 day in water, thermocycled, and tested in shear until failure. The chlorhexidine solution did not significantly affect the shear bond strengths of any of the cements, but the I2-KI/CuSO4 solution significantly lowered the bond strengths of Vitremer and Fuji II LC compared to the controls.     

Low-frequency ultrasound treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in an outpatient therapy

An in vitro dye leakage study was performed to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer, composite resin and glass ionomer/resin cement when used as restorative materials for G.V. Black class V cavities. In this research, standard Class V cavities were prepared in sound premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons. The cavities were randomly divided into 3 groups. After filling the cavities with glass ionomer cement, composite resin and light curing glass ionomer/resin cement, the specimens were immersed in silver nitrate solution. Marginal microleakage at the interface between the cavity wall and restoration was evaluated. The results were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Result of this in vitro study indicate that composite resin and glass ionomer/resin cement provide a better seal than glass ionomer cement.     

Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials

PURPOSE: To compare the shear bond strengths to dentin of four tooth-colored fluoride-releasing restorative materials that utilize different mechanisms of dentin-bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four materials were tested: a chemically-cured glass ionomer (Ketac-Fil); a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil); a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer in conjunction with a resin dentin-bonding agent (Vitremer); and a light-cured resin composite in conjunction with a resin dentin-bonding agent (Tetric). The enamel was removed from four sides of the twenty human noncarious extracted molars which had their roots embedded in acrylic blocks. Cylindrical samples of the materials were prepared in plastic molds and bonded to the dentin surface according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours of storage in a humidor, the samples were sheared with an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. RESULTS: Statistical evaluation (ANOVA and Duncan's test) suggests that the fluoride-releasing resin composite material utilizing a resin dentin-bonding agent provided a significantly greater mean shear bond strength (16.5 MPa) after 24 hours storage than any of the selected glass ionomer materials. Of the three glass ionomer materials compared, the light-cured resin-modified material with a resin dentin-bonding agent provided a significantly greater mean shear bond strength (6.7 MPa) than the light-cured resin-modified material without a resin dentin-bonding agent (3.0 MPa) or the chemically-cured material (3.8 MPa).     

The epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Greenland 1979-1990: the emergence, spread and disappearance of non-PPNG strains carrying the conjugative 38.9 kb plasmid

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of an amalgam, a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment material and a resin-based composite material used in small Class II cavities in permanent teeth. All restorations were inserted under rubber dam. They were examined yearly for 3 years. One clinician continued the study up to 5 years. The clinical examination focused on two criteria: clinically acceptable and failure. In addition, impressions were taken of the prepared cavities immediately before restoration and at each clinical examination using an elastomeric material. The study comprised 274 Class II restorations (88 amalgams, 95 cerments and 91 resin composites) placed in 142 adolescent patients. One hundred and sixty-seven restorations were in molar and 107 in premolar teeth. Patient dropout after 5 years resulted in the loss of 161 restorations, evenly distributed for restorative material and type of tooth involved. Four amalgam restorations, 22 glass ionomer cerment and nine resin composite restorations failed. The glass ionomer cerment and amalgam restorations failed primarily due to bulk fractures, while the resin composite restorations failed due to secondary caries and bulk fractures.     

Accelerated evolution and molecular surface of venom phospholipase A2 enzymes

The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro shear bond strength (in megapascals) and location of bond failure with two light-cured glass ionomer resin systems. One system was a hybrid glass ionomer cement with resin (GC Orthodontics, Aslip, Ill), and the other system a glass-filled resin system (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc, Itasca, Ill). These systems, Fuji Ortho LC (GC Orthodontics) and Ultra Band Lok (Reliance), respectively, were compared to a light-cured composite resin. Maxillary premolar brackets (n = 200) were bonded to the facial surface of human premolar teeth. The two glass ionomer resin systems were each evaluated by two protocols, one according to the manufacturers' direction plus a variation of their respective technique. The five distinct groups (n = 40) were stored in 37 degreesC distilled water for 30 days and subjected to thermocycling before shear bond strength testing. The findings indicated that large variations existed between the bond strengths of the materials tested. The laboratory shear bond strength of the glass-filled resin glass ionomer cement (Reliance), whether tested in a dry or moist field, was similar to the composite control with all of the previous materials being significantly (P <.01) higher than both the hybrid glass ionomer cement groups (Fuji Ortho LC). However, the hybrid glass ionomer cement with enamel conditioner demonstrated a clinically acceptable mean megapascal value. The Adhesive Remnant Index values ranged from 0.53 to 1.62. The hybrid glass ionomer cement without enamel conditioning recorded the lowest mean adhesive remnant index score and the lowest mean megapascal score. Although both products are glass ionomer resin systems, their individual chemistries vary; this affects their clinical performance. Clinically, it may be suggested that glass ionomers used in a dry field may be beneficial for orthodontic bonding, and that glass ionomer resin systems used in a moist environment need an enamel conditioner.     

Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems

This study evaluated the sealing properties of AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Z100/Scotchbond MultiPurpose, AP.H/Imperva Bond, Charisma/Denthesive, Bisfil M/All-Bond 2, resin composite/dentin adhesive systems and Fuji II LC light-cured glass ionomer, in Class V preparations following 6 months of storage in a 37 degrees C water bath. The Class V preparations extended just beyond the cemento-enamel junction of extracted human molars. The restored teeth were placed in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours and then thermally stressed for 100 temperature cycles. Half of the specimens were tested for microleakage at this time. The other specimens were returned to water storage and thermally stressed every 30 days during the following 6 months and then assessed for microleakage by dye penetration. AP.H/Imperva Bond, Z100/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Fuji II LC were not affected by the storage, while AP.H/Prisma Universal Bond 3, Charisma/Denthesive and Bisfil M/All-Bond 2 revealed some increase in microleakage at the dentin/cememtum margin.     

Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements

New-generation glass-ionomer cements contain resin to improve their restorative properties. These resin-modified glass-ionomer cements vary considerably in their chemistry, which could result in corresponding variability in their physical and biological properties. This study investigated the cytotoxicity and the fluoride release of two resin-modified glass ionomers, a conventional glass-ionomer cement, and a resin composite. Samples were prepared and extracted in distilled water for 1, 4, and 7 days; eluates were filtered and tested by means of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity (MTT assay) values were low for all materials and extraction times, indicating minimal cytotoxicity of all materials (less than 30% inhibition). Cytotoxicity of one resin-modified glass ionomer was significantly higher than for the other materials (p < 0.001). One resin-modified glass ionomer and the conventional glass-ionomer cement released significantly more fluoride at each time interval (p < 0.001) than the other resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and the resin composite. Fluoride release and cytotoxicity were correlated (r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001), although the fluoride release does not account for the cytotoxicity observed. Cytotoxicity and fluoride release suggest that one hybrid behaved more like a conventional glass ionomer, and the other like a resin composite. These differences may have implications for material selection in specific clinical situations.     

Artificial caries formation around fluoride-releasing restorations in roots

Secondary caries is one of the most important factors leading to replacement of dental restorations. This investigation assessed the capacity of fluoride-releasing restorative materials to resist caries in vitro when used in roots. Class 5 cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 extracted premolars. The six materials used were: glass-ionomer cement (Fuji), glass-ionomer cement with silver particles added (Ketac-silver), fluoride-containing composite resin (Tetric), composite resin (Silux plus), fluoride-containing amalgam (Fluor-Alloy) and high-copper amalgam (Dispersalloy). After 5 weeks in an acid gel for caries-like lesion formation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and examined with polarized light. The results showed that repair with glass-ionomer materials of a carious lesion may be of great importance in the prevention of secondary caries around the restorations in roots.     

Thermal stability of direct dental esthetic restorative materials at elevated temperatures

With increasing use of direct esthetic restorative materials, the identity of a body may rely upon knowledge of temperature effects on this class of dental restorations. This research examined the effect of atmospheric gas on thermal decomposition and color change of a wide variety of direct esthetic restorative materials. Cured discs (4 x 1 and 8 x 1 mm) were made using manufacturer's directions: traditional glass ionomer (Fuji II), light-curable resonomer (Fuji II LC), compomer (Geristore), and three types of resin composites--highly filled, urethane-based (Occlusin), and two Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resins: hybrid (Herculite XRV) and microfill (Silux Plus). Three replications of each material were heated at 5 degrees C/min in a thermogravimetric analysis unit using either room air or nitrogen purge to simulate different thermal environments. First derivative values of percent weight loss with respect to temperature were obtained to determine temperatures associated with increased decomposition rates. Room-air heating showed greater numbers of decomposition events than did nitrogen-heated discs. The only material decomposing less than 200 degrees C in either atmosphere was traditional glass ionomer. The majority of decomposition occurred between 200 degrees and 500 degrees C for all materials. Only products containing glass ionomer components decomposed between 600 degrees and 800 degrees C. Room-air heating resulted in ash white discs at 800 degrees C and higher. Specimens heated in nitrogen were gray to black at 600 degrees C and higher. Heating atmosphere greatly affected color, and some products demonstrated distinguishing color changes: glass ionomers, in particular, showed characteristic color features. An atlas was constructed from color change of specimens recovered after 200 degrees, 400 degrees, 600 degrees, 800 degrees, and 1000 degrees C compared with non-heated controls.     

The effect of air abrasion on shear bond strength to dentin with dental adhesives

This study compared the effects of different dentin surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of three adhesive systems. The adhesive systems included a resin-modified glass ionomer, Fuji II LC, and two dentin bonding systems, One Step and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. The surface treatments compared for each adhesive system were as follows: 1) the controls, which were conditioned, 2) air abrasion at 120 psi without conditioning, 3) air abrasion at 160 psi without conditioning, 4) air abrasion at 120 psi with conditioning, and 5) air abrasion at 160 psi with conditioning. The KCP 1000 Whisperjet was used for all air-abrasive specimens. Controls for each adhesive material (Fuji II LC, One Step, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) were bonded using manufacturers' recommendations. Results showed that air abrasion significantly lowered bond strength of the resin-modified glass ionomer, conditioned or nonconditioned (P < 0.01). Air abrasion alone significantly lowered bond strengths of the dentin bonding agent systems (P < 0.01). However, air abrasion plus conditioning of the dentin surface resulted in bond strengths that were similar to the conditioned-only specimens (P < 0.01).     

Race, life style and renal disease in South Africa

PURPOSE: Clinical evaluation of repairing old amalgam restorations using composite inlays cemented with two different bonding agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occluso-proximal Class II inlay cavities were prepared in 50 old defective amalgam restorations. Extra oral system (EOS) composite inlays were cemented with two different bonding agents (All-Bond 2 or Geristore). After final finishing and polishing of each restoration, evaluation was carried out at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months using US Public Health Service criteria. The data were collected and statistically analyzed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two bonding materials at any time interval.     

Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glass-ionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins

The fluoride release of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomers is reviewed and compared to that of fluoride-releasing (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Each formulation displays a typical fluoride release profile. The cumulative amount of fluoride released is described by [F]c = [F](I)t/(t + t1/2) + beta square root t for glass ionomers whether resin-modified or not, whereas for composite resins this quantity is given by [F]c = [F](I)t/(t + t1/2) + alpha t. Both equations indicate that two kinetic processes are responsible for the fluoride release profiles. The kinetic parameters [F](I), t1/2, beta and alpha depend on the formulation. On the basis of the exchange characteristics for fluoride, an attempt is made to explain the mechanisms responsible for these fluoride release processes.