Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis following laparoscopic left colon resection

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an intracorporeal double-stapled colorectal anastomosis upon the outcome of laparoscopic left colon resection. METHODS: Fifty-four selected patients underwent elective laparoscopic left colon resection for benign disease. Once resection was completed, a 33-mm suprapubic port allowed insertion of the anvil of a circular stapler into the colon, which was closed by a handsewn purse-string suture using the T-needle technique. The circular stapler was passed transanally to perform a double-stapled anastomosis. Specimens were delivered in a plastic bag via the suprapubic port. RESULTS: There were no deaths. Minor intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3.7% and 9.2% of the patients, respectively. Median operating time was 125 min (range 80-210 min). Complete proximal and distal doughnuts were obtained in all patients and anastomoses were all methylene blue tight. Median hospital stay was 4 (range 3-7) days. CONCLUSIONS: Fashioning double-stapled colorectal anastomoses intracorporeally is feasable and safe.     

Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections. A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Conventional colorectal resections are associated with severe postoperative pain and prolonged fatigue. The laparoscopic approach to colorectal tumors may result in less pain as well as less fatigue, and may improve postoperative recovery after colorectal resections. METHODS: Sixty patients were included into a prospective randomized trial to determine the influence of laparoscopic (n = 30) or conventional (n = 30) resection of colorectal tumors on postoperative pain and fatigue. Major endpoints of the study were dose of morphine sulfate during patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), visual analog scale for pain while coughing (VASC), and visual analogue scale for fatigue (VASF). Efficacy of pain medication was assessed by visual analogue score at rest (VASR). RESULTS: Preoperative age, sex, stage, and localization of tumors were comparable in both groups. The PCA dose of morphine given immediately after surgery until postoperative day 4 was higher in the conventional group (median, 1.37 mg/kg; 5-95 percentile 0.71-2. 46 mg/kg) than the laparoscopic group (0.78 mg/kg; 0.24-2.38 mg/kg, p < 0.01). Postoperative VASR was comparable between both groups, but VASC was higher from the first to the seventh postoperative day (p < 0.01). Postoperative fatigue was higher after conventional than after laparoscopic surgery from the second to the seventh day (p < 0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that analgetic requirements are lower and pain is less intense after laparoscopic than after conventional colorectal resection. Patients also experience less fatigue after minimal invasive surgery. Because of these differences, the duration of recovery is shortened, and the postoperative quality of life is improved after laparoscopic colorectal resections.     

A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies using laparoscopic techniques in colorectal surgery have not demonstrated clear advantages to these procedures compared with conventional ones, and surgeons are concerned about unusual early recurrences reported after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in one surgical department comparing laparoscopic (LAP) and conventional (CON) techniques in 109 patients undergoing bowel resection for colorectal cancers or polyps. Postoperatively, all patients underwent measurement of pulmonary function tests every 12 hours, and were treated identically on a highly controlled protocol with regard to analgesic administration, feeding, and postoperative care. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients assigned to LAP and 54 to the CON group, there were 42 and 38 with cancer, respectively (the other patients had large adenomas). Overall recovery of 80% of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity was a median of 3 days for LAP and 6.0 days for CON (p = 0.01). LAP patients used significantly less morphine than CON patients up to the second day after surgery (0.78 +/- 0.32 versus 0.92 +/- 0.34 mg/kg per day, p = 0.02). Flatus returned a median of 3.0 days after LAP versus 4.0 days after CON surgery (p = 0.006). Tumor margins were clear in all patients. After a median followup of 1.5 years (LAP) and 1.7 years (CON), there were no port site recurrences in the LAP group. Seven cancer-related deaths have occurred (three in the LAP group, four in the CON group). CONCLUSIONS: Within this prospective, randomized trial, laparoscopic techniques were as safe as conventional surgical techniques and offered a faster recovery of pulmonary and gastrointestinal function compared with conventional surgery for selected patients undergoing large bowel resection for cancer or polyps. There were no apparent shortterm oncologic disadvantages. Longer followup is needed to fully assess oncologic outcomes.     

Sexual function following high energy microwave thermotherapy: results of a randomized controlled study comparing transurethral microwave thermotherapy to transurethral prostatic resection

PURPOSE: We evaluate changes in sexual function in patients treated with high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 147 patients randomized to undergo transurethral microwave thermotherapy or transurethral resection of the prostate were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire evaluating sexual function before, and 3 and 12 months after treatment. The questionnaire dealt with such items as social status, libido, quality of erection, ejaculation and overall satisfaction of sexual functioning. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement of micturition in both groups. The improvement in the transurethral prostatic resection group was significantly better than in the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group. Antegrade ejaculation occurred at 3 months following treatment in 27% of the transurethral prostatic resection group compared to 74% of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and at 1 year in 37 and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients undergoing transurethral prostatic resection (36%) had changes in sexual function compared to the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group (17%). The transurethral microwave thermotherapy group was more satisfied with the sex life. Of these patients 55% graded sex as very satisfying compared to 21% in the transurethral prostatic resection group. The severity of symptoms was not correlated with sexual function in this study. In general, older patients had sexual dysfunction more often, while younger patients had pain during sexual activities more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinically less effective, high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a better therapeutic option than surgery for patients who want to preserve sexual function. In particular ejaculation is often preserved after transurethral microwave thermotherapy while there is significant deterioration following transurethral prostatic resection. In general, older patients have greater sexual dysfunction.     

Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?

BACKGROUND: We set out to compare the results of laparoscopic and open resections of colorectal polyps. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent operation by a single surgeon for endoscopically irretrievable colonic polyps between April 1992 and March 1996 were classified into the following two groups: group I, laparoscopic procedures for colonic polyps (n = 23); and group II, open procedures for colonic polyps (n = 22). RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between the groups relative to age [71.7 +/- 10.7 versus 70.6 +/- 13.7 years], gender [male:female = 10:13 versus 13:9], history of previous abdominal operation (eight of 23 [34.8%] versus 10 of 22 [45.5%]), type of pathology (villous: seven of 23 [30.4%] versus four of 22 [18.1%], tubulovillous: nine of 23 [39.1%] versus six of 22 [27.2%], tubular: three of 23 [13.0%] versus seven of 22 [31.8%]), size of polyps (2.6 +/- 1.7 cm versus 2.7 +/- 1.5 cm), or type of procedures (right hemicolectomy: 15 of 23 [65.2%] versus 11 of 22 [50%], sigmoid colectomy: five of 23 [21.7%] versus six of 22 [27.3%], left hemicolectomy: two of 23 [8.7%] versus two of 22 [9.1%]). There was no mortality and no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (four of 23 [17.4%] versus seven of 22 [31.8%]), blood loss (167 cc versus 243 cc), number of retrieved lymph nodes (7.1 +/- 5 versus 6.6 +/- 4), incidence of carcinoma in polyps (two of 23 [13.0%] versus four of 22 [18.2%]), or medical cost ($22,840 versus $18,420), respectively, between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in length of ileus (3.5 +/- 1.0 days versus 5.5 +/- 1.8 days), postoperative pain (2.3 +/- 1.4 versus 3.7 +/- 1.9 on postoperative day 1 [patient pain rating scale 1-10]), length of hospital stay (6. 5 +/- 2.0 days versus 9.4 +/- 2.7 days), and return to normal activity (5.2 +/- 4.2 weeks versus 9.3 +/- 12.1 weeks) in group I compared to group II, respectively. However, patients in group II had a longer mean specimen length (18.5 +/- 6.4 cm versus 29.1 +/- 22.7 cm) and a shorter mean operative time (177.6 +/- 52.7 min versus 143 +/- 51.4 min) than patients in group I. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colectomy for colonic polyps has definite advantages over traditional open surgery, including less postoperative pain, earlier return of bowel function, and earlier return to normal activity. Conversely, its disadvantages include longer operative time and a shorter specimen.     

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was carried out to assess the relative efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of postoperative wound infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Trials Register and the references cited in retrieved studies were searched to identify relevant trials published between 1984 and 1995. RESULTS: Some 147 relevant trials were identified. The quality of trials has improved over the past 12 years. The results confirm that the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective for the prevention of surgical wound infection after colorectal surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical wound infections between many different regimens. However, certain regimens appear to be inadequate (e.g. metronidazole alone, doxycycline alone, piperacillin alone, oral neomycin plus erythromycin on the day before operation). A single dose administered immediately before the operation (or short-term use) is as effective as long-term postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (odds ratio 1.17 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.90-1.53)). There is no convincing evidence to suggest that the new-generation cephalosporins are more effective than first-generation cephalosporins (odds ratio 1.07 (95 per cent c.i. 0.54-2.12)). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics selected for prophylaxis in colorectal surgery should be active against both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Administration should be timed to make sure that the tissue concentration of antibiotics around the wound area is sufficiently high when bacterial contamination occurs. Guidelines should be developed locally in order to achieve a more cost-effective use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.     

Early postoperative nutrition after laparoscopic and open colorectal resection

OBJECTIVE: In the United Kingdom in 1994-95 about 16,500 women aged 50 to 64 were asked to come back earlier than the usual three yearly screening interval for further mammography (early rescreen (ES)) or for a range of further investigations at an assessment centre (early recall (ER)). This study aimed at providing epidemiological data on ES/ER, in particular, how often and why it is used, and what the outcome is of using it. SETTING: National Health Service breast screening programme in the United Kingdom. METHODS: All breast screening units were invited to complete a postal questionnaire. Two reminders were sent. The units were asked retrospectively to provide breast screening data about women aged 50 to 64 from their local computer systems. Women placed on ES/ER were followed up for at least one year. RESULTS: The response rate was 71% (69/97), of which 14% (10/69) were unable to provide the required data, leaving 59 completed questionnaires (61%). The rate of placing women on ES/ER was above 1.0% for 26/54 (48%) responding breast screening units and above 2.0% for 13/54 (24%) units. Women were placed on ES/ER because of (a) previous breast cancer (21% of cases; cancer detection rate 2.4%), (b) diagnostic uncertainty (51%; cancer detection rate 3.0%), or (c) family history (27%; cancer detection rate 0.6%). Breast screening units with a high rate of placing women on ER were significantly more likely to have a high recall rate (rs = 0.63; n = 53; p < 0.0005) or a high benign surgical biopsy rate (rs = 0.33; n = 49; p < 0.05), or both. The cancer detection rate of ES/ER tended to decrease with increasing ES/ER rates (rs = -0.37; n = 51; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A relatively large number of women were placed on ES or ER for a range of reasons. If the recommendations given are followed, the number of women placed on ER may be reduced while maintaining the cancer detection rate at the required level. The option of ES should not be used.     

Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum

PURPOSE: This prospective study was performed to serially assess the changes in anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum, and to elucidate the mechanisms of functional impairment and the recovery process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer were evaluated prospectively. Standardized interviews concerning anorectal function and physiologic studies consisting of manometry and balloon proctometry were performed preoperatively, then at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. Depending on the length of the residual rectum, patients were divided into two groups: (1) shorter than 4 cm (the short group, n = 18), and (2) longer than or equal to 4 cm (the long group, n = 14). RESULTS: Postoperatively, stool frequency increased and urgency to defecate occurred, which continued until 3-6 months had passed and was more remarkable in the short group. Overall incontinence score increased, which was more remarkable in the short group. Anal resting pressure showed a moderate reduction after 3 months, whereas squeeze pressure did not decrease significantly. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was postoperatively abolished in almost all patients in the short group, which showed nearly no recovery for 1 year. In the long group, it persisted postoperatively in half the cases, and the reflex returned in a few cases within 1 year. Balloon proctometry revealed overall reduction in rectal capacity and compliance. Although the values tended to recover steadily, they did not reach the preoperative level for 1 year. Urgent volume and maximal tolerable volume remarkably declined, which continued for 1 year and for 6 months, respectively. Rectal compliance also decreased considerably, which continued for 6 months. Most values of rectal capacity tended to be smaller in the short group. CONCLUSION: Impairment of continence after low anterior resection seemed multifactorial, including diminished rectal capacity and compliance, impaired internal anal sphincter tone, and loss of rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Clinical outcome was better and reduction in rectal capacity was less in patients whose rectum remained more than 4 cm. Most of the functional impairments clinically recovered by 6 months postoperation. In the process of clinical recovery of continence, restoration of rectal capacity and compliance and internal anal sphincter tone seemed to contribute a significant degree, while the rectoanal inhibitory reflex did not contribute as much.     

Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study

The discussion about laparoscopic appendectomy has increased since the introduction of this method. Randomized comparisons are still feasible, whereas this cannot be stated for other laparoscopic procedures (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy). This randomized controlled trial included 170 patients. Open appendectomy was employed in 83 patients, and 87 were treated laparoscopically. The treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex, Broca index, ASA classification, preliminary operations, and preoperative leucocytes. No statistically significant differences could be found with respect to surgical and general complications, operating time, consumption of analgesics and antibiotics, and return to work. The analysis revealed a statistically significant shorter hospital stay, a shorter time until return to normal physical activity, and a shorter duration of complaints for the laparoscopic group. We were unable to demonstrate any statistically significant advantage in using the open procedure.     

Determinants of survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer

Hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This retrospective review study was undertaken in an attempt to identify factors that influence patient survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. From January 1978 to December 1993, a total of 301 patients underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. Of those, 245 patients had one resection, 44 had two resections, and 12 had three resections. For all patients the overall median survival was 20.6 months, operative mortality was 1.1%, and overall morbidity was 17.2%. Average hospital stay was 9 days. Statistical analysis included univariate analysis using log rank comparisons, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression. The statistically significant factors that influenced survival were distribution of liver metastases, unilobar versus bilobar (p = 0.0001), resected versus nonresected (p < 0.0001), and tumor-free surgical margins versus positive margins (p = 0.001). Surprisingly, the disease-free interval and the original stage of the primary tumor did not predict survival (p = not significant). Other factors that had no influence on survival were type of resection, size and number of liver metastases, ABO blood group, and the number of perioperative blood transfusions. For those patients who underwent resection of unilobar metastases with tumor-free margins, the 5-year survival rate was 29% with a median survival of 35 months and eight survivors > 7 years. In addition, one patient with bilobar disease had survival > 7 years and five patients who had resection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic cancer simultaneously had survival > 3 years. Our data support the concept that patients with unilobar metastatic disease who undergo surgical resection with tumor-free surgical margins can be afforded a significant opportunity at long-term survival with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. Also, certain patients with bilobar or extrahepatic disease (or both) who undergo complete resection can enjoy a long-term survival. In these subgroups of patients resection should be considered on an individual basis.     

Parents and procedures: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Previous work has shown that parents prefer to be present when their children undergo common invasive procedures, although physicians are ambivalent about parental presence. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a parent-focused intervention on the pain and performance of the procedure, anxiety of parents and clinicians, and parental satisfaction with care. POPULATION: Children younger than 3 years old undergoing venipuncture, intravenous cannulation, or uretheral catheterization. SETTING: Pediatric emergency department of Boston City Hospital. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with three groups; parents present and given instructions on how to help their children; parents present, but no instructions given; and parents not present. INTERVENTION: The parents were instructed to touch, talk to, and maintain eye contact during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 431 parents was randomized to the intervention (N = 153), present (N = 147), and not present (N = 131) groups. The groups were equivalent with respect to measured sociodemographic variables and parents' previous experience in the pediatric emergency department. No differences emerged with respect to pain (3-point scale measured by parent and clinician, and analysis of cry); performance of the procedure (number of attempts, completion of procedure by first clinician, time); clinician anxiety; or parental satisfaction with care. Parents who were present were more likely to rate the pain of the children as extreme/severe (52%) in comparison to clinicians (15%, kappa .07, poor agreement) and were significantly less anxious than parents who were not present. CONCLUSION: Overall, the intervention was not effective in reducing the pain of routine procedures. Parental presence did not negatively affect performance of the procedure or increase clinician anxiety. Parents who were present were less anxious than those who were not present. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: In general, parents have indicated that they want to be present when their children undergo procedures. The results of this study challenge the traditional belief that parental presence negatively affects our ability to successfully complete procedures. We should encourage parents who want to be present to stay during procedures.     

A randomized controlled trial of extraperitoneal bupivacaine analgesia in laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the frequency of surgical site infection development after discharge from the hospital after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy and the frequency of use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this patient group. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy between February 1 and December 31, 1995. Surgeons were contacted 1 month after the operations to determine which patients had acquired surgical site infections. Surgical site infection rates were calculated according to procedure, surgeon, and National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system risk categories. A retrospective pharmacy record review was conducted to determine antimicrobial prophylaxis use according to procedure and surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 763 cases were surveyed; 55 (7.2%) met criteria for postoperative surgical site infection (7.7% abdominal and 4.5% vaginal hysterectomy). National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system moderate-risk patients had significantly higher infection rates than did low-risk patients for both abdominal (p = 0.045) and vaginal (p = 0.05) procedures. Most patients (71.1%) were not given antimicrobial prophylaxis. There was a wide range of antimicrobial prophylaxis use by surgeon (3.6% to 94.4% of patients, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite long-standing and widespread recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis before hysterectomy, most of our patients were operated on without such prophylaxis. Surveillance programs permit detailed review of patient care practices that may reveal opportunities for improvement.     

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs. METHODS: To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit. RESULTS: Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower. CONCLUSION: Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense.     

Nutritional support after hepatic resection: a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND: A consensus as to whether hypertonic dextrose should be given to patients with chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis after major hepatectomy has not been reached, mostly because metabolism in the remnant liver switches from utilization of blood glucose to utilization predominantly of fatty acid as an energy source. We investigated whether nutritional support would have beneficial effects for such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 19 patients, 10 were given peripheral dextrose (10 kcal/kg/day) for seven days following hepatectomy and the other 9 were given hypertonic glucose. Twenty and 30 kcal/kg/day was the average non-protein caloric intake, including free oral intake during the first one week following hepatectomy, respectively. RESULTS: The groups were comparable with regard to laboratory data and operative stress. There were no untoward effects related to this support. In patients given nutritional support, retinol binding protein and prealbumin improved (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively), urinary 3-methylhistidine excretion decreased (p < 0.01) and the nitrogen balance normalized earlier (p < 0.05), as compared to findings with the conventional method. CONCLUSION: The remnant liver can utilize dextrose and nutritional support improves the nutritional status and may even preserve muscle protein mass.     

Abstinence or controlled drinking goals for problem drinkers: A randomized clinical trial.

24 adult problem drinkers were assigned to brief behavioral treatment with either an abstinence (AB) or a controlled drinking (CD) goal. Self-report and collateral report data reflect significant overall reduction in alcohol consumption and projected blood alcohol peaks at 3-mo and at 3.5-yr follow-up intervals. AB and CD Ss did not differ significantly from each other on outcome variables at any point before or after treatment. At 3.5 yrs, 4 Ss had been abstinent for at least 12 mo, 3 had been moderate and asymptomatic drinkers for at least 12 mo, 5 were improved but still somewhat impaired, 8 were unimproved, 3 refused to be interviewed, and 1 could not be located. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Perforated peptic ulcer: a comparison of long term results following partial gastric resection or simple closure

The results of simple closure were compared with those of partial resection in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. The investigation was carried out 7-13 years after the primary operation on 126 patients who had been allotted to one of the two treatment methods on the basis of an almost randomized schedule. Better late results were obtained with partial resection than with simple closure in patients in the age range 50-59 years at operation, with short duration of perforation and with a long history of symptoms before perforation. None of the patients treated with partial resection later underwent surgical treatment for recurrence of symptoms. In the simple closure group 27.3 per cent needed further surgery at 3 months to 10 years after perforation.