Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Commercial grade poly(ethylene terephthalate), (PET, intrinsic viscosity = 0.80 dL/g) and poly(butylene terephthalate), (PBT, intrinsic viscosity = 1.00 dL/g) were melt blended over the entire composition range using a counterrotating twin‐screw extruder. The mechanical, thermal, electrical, and rheological properties of the blends were studied. All of the blends showed higher impact properties than that of PET or PBT. The 50:50 blend composition exhibited the highest impact value. Other mechanical properties also showed similar trends for blends of this composition. The addition of PBT increased the processability of PET. Differential scanning calorimetry data showed the presence of both phases. For all blends, only a single glass‐transition temperature was observed. The melting characteristics of one phase were influenced by the presence of the other. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 75–82, 2005     

Compatibility in immiscible polysulfone/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Polysulfone (PSU)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends were obtained by direct injection molding across the composition range. Their phase behavior, thermal properties, morphology, and mechanical properties were measured. The blends were composed of a pure PSU amorphous phase and either a pure PET phase in PSU‐poor blends, or a PET‐rich phase with some dissolved PSU in PSU‐rich blends. The morphology of the dispersed phase was mostly spherical with some elongated particles in the PET‐rich blends. A slight synergistic behavior was observed in the Young's modulus, mainly in the 90/10 blend, which is probably due to orientation effects. The presence of some broken particles indicated some interfacial adhesion. The ductility values were approximately linear with composition. This was generally the case in PSU‐rich blends, and was attributed to the higher level of PSU in the PET‐rich phase. Although embrittlement was seen in blends with 30% of the second component, the ductility of the two pure components did not significantly decrease after annealing due to the presence of low amounts (up to 10%) of another component of the blend. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2193–2200, 2004     

Crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly (butylene terephthalate) modified by diamides

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly (butylene terephthalate) have been modified by diamide units (0.1–1 mol%) in an extrusion process and the crystallization behavior studied. The diamides used were: for PET, T2T‐dimethyl (N, N′‐bis(p‐carbomethoxybenzoyl)ethanediamine) and for PBT, T4T‐dimethyl (N, N′‐bis(p‐carbomethoxybenzoyl)butanediamine). The above materials were compared to talc (0.5 wt%), this being a standard heterogeneous nucleator, and to diamide modified copolymers obtained by a reactor process. Two PET materials were used: a slowly crystallizing recycled grade obtained from soft drink bottles and a rapidly crystallizing injection molding grade. The crystallization was studied by differential scanning calometry (DSC) and under injection molding conditions using wedge shaped specimens; the thermal properties were studied by dynamic mechanical analysis. T2T‐dimethyl is effective in increasing the crystallization of PET in both of the extrusion compounds as well as in the reactor materials. It was also found that the crystallization temperature of poly(butylene terephthalate) could be slightly increased by the addition of nucleators.     

Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

Primary structure and physical properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) resin blends

The morphology and properties of blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) that were injection molded under various conditions were studied. Under injection molding conditions that make it possible to secure transparency, blends did not show clear crystallinity at blending ratios of more than 20 mol% in spite of the fact that crystallinity can be observed in the range of PEN content up to 30 mol%. Because both transparency and crystallinity could be secured with a PEN 12 mol% blend, this material was used in injection molding experiments with various injection molding cycles. Whitening occurred with a cycle of 20 sec, and transparency was obtained at 30 sec or more. This was attributed to the fact that transesterification between PET and PEN exceeded 5 mol% and phase solubility (compatibility) between the PET and PEN increased when the injection molding time was 30 sec or longer. However, when the transesterification content exceeded 8 mol%, molecularly oriented crystallization did not occur, even under stretching, and consequently, it was not possible to increase the strength of the material by stretching. PET/PEN blend resins are more easily crystallized by stretch heat‐setting than are PET/PEN copolymer resins. It was understood that this is because residual PET, which has not undergone transesterification, contributes to crystallization. However, because transesterification reduces crystallinity, the heat‐set density of blends did not increase as significantly as that of pure PET, even in high temperature heat‐setting. Gas permeability showed the same tendency as density. Namely, pure PET showed a substantial decrease in oxygen transmission after high temperature heat‐setting, but the decrease in gas permeability in the blend material was small at heat‐set temperatures of 140°C and higher.     

Impact modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The tensile and impact resistance of impact‐modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is investigated. The impact modifiers are polyolefin‐based elastomers or elastomer blends containing glycidyl methacrylate moieties to improve the adhesion with the polyester. The tensile properties are measured on injection molded specimens at room temperature while the Izod impact strength is measured from ?40 to 20°C. The blend morphology is observed by scanning electron microscopy and the dispersed phase average diameter is determined by image analysis. The relation between the impact resistance and the phase morphology is discussed, and the critical ligament size for PET is determined. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2919–2932, 2003     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)–poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) blends with montmorillonite clay

The production and properties of blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) (PEN) with three modified clays are reported. Octadecylammonium chloride and maleic anhydride (MAH) are used to modify the surface of the montmorillonite–Na⁺ clay particles (clay–Na⁺) to produce clay–C18 and clay–MAH, respectively, before they are mixed with the PET/PEN system. The transesterification degree, hydrophobicity and the effect of the clays on the mechanical, rheological and thermal properties are analysed. The PET–PEN/clay–C18 system does not show any improvements in the mechanical properties, which is attributed to poor exfoliation. On the other hand, in the PET–PEN/clay–MAH blends, the modified clay restricts crystallization of the matrix, as evidenced in the low value of the crystallization enthalpy. The process‐induced PET–PEN transesterification reaction is affected by the clay particles. Clay–C18 induces the largest proportion of naphthalate–ethylene–terephthalate (NET) blocks, as opposed to clay–Na⁺ which renders the lowest proportion. The clay readily incorporates in the bulk polymer, but receding contact‐angle measurements reveal a small influence of the particles on the surface properties of the sample. The clay–Na⁺ blend shows a predominant solid‐like behaviour, as evidenced by the magnitude of the storage modulus in the low‐frequency range, which reflects a high entanglement density and a substantial degree of polymer–particle interactions. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology and thermal properties of recycled polyacrylonitrile fiber blends with poly(ethylene terephthalate): Microstructural characterization

The compounding of rPAN/PET [polyacrylonitrile/poly(ethylene terephthalate]; 30/70, 50/50, and 70/30 wt %) using a melt‐blending technique was the main focus of this investigation. An X‐ray diffraction study indicated the possibility of interphase boundary interactions between the polymer matrices in the blends. The differential scanning calorimetry results showed that varying the ratios of rPAN in the blends marginally improved the processing temperature of PET. The thermogravimetric analysis revealed that the addition of PET up to 70% increased the thermal stability of the blend, and adding more than 70% of PET resulted in poor adhesion between the matrix and phase. On the basis of the results obtained, we propose a general understanding of how the morphology and the mechanical and thermal properties of the blend could assist in the development of rPAN blends with PET, rather than disposing of the viable materials as wastes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43777.     

Micromechanical behavior of impact modified poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The micromechanical behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET, modified with a metallocene polyolefin copolymer (mPE) was investigated. Uniaxial deformation tests were performed using a tensile stage in a scanning electron microscope. This technique allowed the identification of the main deformation mechanisms that are associated with energy dissipation and toughness improvement. The poly(ethylene terephthalate) was blended with 5 wt% mPE by single‐screw extrusion. Films with thicknesses ranging from 200 to 500 μm were produced. Observation of the surfaces of the films during uniaxial deformation revealed the sequence of events leading to the full yielding of the matrix. In the early stages of deformation, the particles deform together with the matrix. As the deformation is increased, cavitation inside the particles occurs and fibrillation at the particle/matrix interface is observed, as well as the onset of shear banding. In order to study the effect of interfacial adhesion of the deformation mechanisms, the PET/mPE blends were compatibilized by grafting with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA). The reduction of the particle size was significant, which is indicative of the efficiency of GMA grafting in this type of blend. In this case, the particles were difficult to detect on the surface. Cavitation and shear banding occurred simultaneously. A similar behavior was observed in the case of oriented blends.     

Morphology and barrier properties of oriented blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol)

Morphology and oxygen permeability studies were carried out for blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET, and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate), PEN, with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol), EVOH. PET/EVOH blends are seen as a possible substitute for poly(vinylidene chloride)-coated PET packaging films. The effects of several processing parameters such as draw temperature and draw ratio on blend morphology and barrier properties suggest that the morphology of the EVOH phase dictates to a large extent the oxygen permeabilities of these blends. The relationships between morphology and oxygen permeability and explained are explained by consideration of two-phase conduction models. The model of Fricke is found to be a good predictor of the barrier properties of the PET/EVOH system. The oxygen permeability of PET was reduced by a factor of 4.2 with the addition of 20 wt% EVOH and that of PEN by a factor of 2.7 with the addition of 15 wt% EVOH. Water vapor permeabilities and mechanical properties of PET and PEN were only slightly affected by the addition of 15 wt% EVOH.     

Low temperature solid‐state extrusion of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) bottle scraps

The processing of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) involves thermal and hydrolytic degradation of the polymer chain, which reduces not only the intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight, but also the mechanical properties of recycled materials. A novel PET/bisphenol A polycarbonate/styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene alloy based on recycled PET scraps is prepared by low temperature solid‐state extrusion. Hydrolysis and thermal degradation of PET can be greatly reduced by low temperature solid‐state extrusion because the extrusion temperature is between the glass‐transition temperature and cold‐crystallization temperature of PET. Modification of recycled PET by low temperature solid‐state extrusion is an interesting method; it not only provides an easy method to recycle PET scraps by blend processing, but it can also form novel structures such as orientation, crystallization, and networks in the alloy. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2692–2699, 2006     

PET蓄光纤维的研制及性能研究

采用共混纺丝法制备了PET蓄光纤维,并对纤维的性能进行了研究。SEM分析表明,采用偶联剂可以有效地改善聚酯与蓄光粉体组成的共混体系的相容性,减小分散相颗粒的尺寸。预先将PET、蓄光粉体与偶联剂制备成母粒用于纺丝,可以明显提高体系的可纺性。同时,研究了蓄光粉体的含量对纤维力学性能和发光性能的影响。     

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene glycol‐co‐1,3/1,4‐cyclohexanedimethanol terephthalate)/clay nanocomposites: Effects of biaxial stretching

In this study, we fabricated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/clay, PET/poly(ethylene glycol‐co‐1,3/1,4‐cyclohexanedimethanol terephthalate) (PETG), and PET/PETG/clay nanocomposite plates and biaxially stretched them into films by using a biaxial film stretching machine. The tensile properties, cold crystallization behavior, optical properties, and gas and water vapor barrier properties of the resulting films were estimated. The biaxial stretching process improved the dispersion of clay platelets in both the PETG and PET/PETG matrices, increased the aspect ratio of the platelets, and made the platelets more oriented. Thus, the tensile, optical, and gas‐barrier properties of the composite films were greatly enhanced. Moreover, strain‐induced crystallization occurred in the PET/PETG blend and in the amorphous PETG matrix. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42207.     

Improving low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends with graft copolymers

Blends of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were prepared with different weight compositions with a plasticorder at 240°C at a rotor speed of 64 rpm for 10 min. The physicomechanical properties of the prepared blends were investigated with special reference to the effects of the blend ratio. Graft copolymers, that is, LDPE‐grafted acrylic acid and LDPE‐grafted acrylonitrile, were prepared with γ‐irradiation. The copolymers were melt‐mixed in various contents (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 phr) with a LDPE/PET blend with a weight ratio of 75/25 and used as compatibilizers. The effect of the compatibilizer contents on the physicomechanical properties and equilibrium swelling of the binary blend was investigated. With an increase in the compatibilizer content up to 7 phr, the blend showed an improvement in the physicomechanical properties and reduced equilibrium swelling in comparison with the uncompatibilized one. The addition of a compatibilizer beyond 7 phr did not improve the blend properties any further. The efficiency of the compatibilizers (7 phr) was also evaluated by studies of the phase morphology (scanning electron microscopy) and thermal properties (differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber functionalization for the toughening modification of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The incorporation of functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (NBR) into recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was introduced as an effective route for modifying the properties of PET and as a new method for PET recycling as well. To achieve modified NBR, glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was grafted onto NBR with optimized reactive mixing, in which the highest grafting degree and lowest gel content were generated. PET/NBR blends with and without GMA functionalization were produced by melt mixing, and the mechanical properties, dynamic mechanical thermal properties, and phase morphologies of the systems were determined and compared. We found that low amounts of peroxide initiator (dicumyl peroxide) and high levels of the GMA monomer in the presence of the styrene comonomer led to the maximum grafting degree and suppressed the competing rubber crosslinking and GMA homopolymerization reactions. The blend compatibility with PET determined from dynamic mechanical thermal analysis spectra and scanning electron microscopy images was greatly improved when the NBR‐grafted GMA was used instead of the neat NBR in the blend recipes. As a result, the rubber phase dispersed in the PET matrix more finely, and the impact strength of the blend advanced very significantly. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40483.     

Polyester nanocomposite fibers: comparison of their properties with poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (II)

Summary Two polyester nanocomposites were synthesized, one with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and the other with poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), by using organoclay. The in-situ interlayer polymerization method was used to disperse the organoclay in polyesters at different organoclay contents and at different draw ratios to produce monofilaments. The thermal stability and tensile mechanical properties increased with increasing organoclay content at a DR=1 . However, the values of the tensile mechanical properties of the hybrid fibers decreased with increasing DR. The reinforcing effects of the organoclay of the PET hybrid fibers were higher than those of the PTT hybrid fibers.     

Fibers from poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate) blends I. Mechanical behavior

Fibers prepared from poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) blends show a sharp decrease in tensile strength and modulus when blends are on the verge of phase segregation. The modulus values differ for homopolymers for their differences in chain configuration and methylene groups and that of the blends are in proportion. The experimental strength values are higher than the predicted values according to Paul's model for incompatible polymers. At 90/10 PET/PBT blend, the modulus is high, which may be a relative factor to the smaller crystal size of the components.     

Phase separation,physical properties and melt rheology of a range of variously transesterified amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate)–poly(ethylene naphthalate) blends

Amorphous, partially transesterified poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends of different levels of transesterification and blend composition were investigated in terms of resultant phase behavior, thermal transitions, and melt rheological properties. Intrinsic viscosities of the lowest transesterified material were found to be significantly below those of a physical blend of an identical composition, but at higher levels of transesterification, there was little difference. This was similarly found in melt rheometry measurements, where the zero‐shear rate viscosity of the low and highly transesterified mixtures were similar. Both solution and melt rheometry indicated that the molecular weight decreased by thermal degradation from processing. This is believed to play an important role in determining the final molecular architecture and properties. For similar levels of ester interchange, there was a minimum observed in zero shear melt viscosity at around 40 wt % PEN. This is likely due to competition between the slightly transesterified copolymer chains having poorer packing in the melt and reduced entanglement. Differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis were used to investigate the phase behavior of partially and fully transesterified blends. Results for the glass transition of the highly transesterified blends were compared with the theoretical values calculated from the Fox equation and were found to be close, although slightly lower. A correlation between the melting temperature of the blend and the degree of transesterification was shown to exist. This correlation can be used to estimate the degree of ester exchange reaction from these melting transitions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1556–1567, 2002