Nanostructured polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐polybutadiene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers modified with polystyrene and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymers

Morphologies of polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐ polybutadiene‐b ‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) triblock copolymer were predicted, adopting the phase diagram proposed by Stadler and co‐workers for neat SBM block copolymer, and were experimentally proved using atomic force microscopy. All investigated polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymer modified with polystyrene (PS) and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) homopolymers showed the expected nanostructures. For polymer blends of symmetric SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with PS homopolymer, the cylinders in cylinders core?shell morphology and the perforated lamellae morphology were obtained. Moreover, modifying the same SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with both PS and PMMA homopolymers the cylinders at cylinders morphology was reached. The predictions for morphologies of blends based on asymmetric SBM‐2 triblock copolymer were also confirmed experimentally, visualizing a spheres over spheres structure. This work presents an easy way of using PS and/or PMMA homopolymers for preparing nanostructured polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymers with desired morphologies, similar to those of neat SBM block copolymers. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology of HDPE/(PEC/PS) blends modified with SEBS copolymers

In this study, immiscible blends of HDPE and an amorphous glassy polymer were compatibilized with styrene-hydrogenated butadiene block copolymers. The glassy phase consisted of either pure PS or a miscible blend of PS and polyether copolymer (PEC); PEC is similar to poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO). The morphology of these two-phase mixtures depended on physical characteristics of the components and the method of fabrication. Suitable copolymers increased the degree of dispersion and minimized heterogeneities resulting from the inherent incompatibility of the individual phases. Further reduction in the phase size and increased adhesion between the components of modified blends were achieved by increasing the composition of PEC in the glassy phase. It was concluded that favorable exothermic mixing between PEC and PS endblocks of the copolymers provided an additional driving force for compatibilization. Results from dynamic mechanical thermal analysis suggests that penetration by the copolymers into the homopolymer phases is not complete.     

The characteristic properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/polystyrene core‐shell composite polymer latex

In this study, the poly(methyl methacrylate/polystyrene (PMMA/PS) core‐shell composite latex was synthesized by the method of soapless seeded emulsion polymerization. The morphology of the PMMA/PS composite latex was core‐shell structure, with PMMA as the core and PS as the shell. The core‐shell morphology of the composite polymer latex was found to be thermally unstable. Under the effect of thermal annealing, the PS shell region first dispersed into the PMMA core region, and later separated out to the outside of the PMMA core region. This was explained on the basis of lowing interfacial tension between the PMMA and PS phases owing to the interpenetration layer. The interpenetration layer, which was located at the interface of the core and shell region, contained graft copolymer and entangled polymer chains. Both the graft copolymer and entangled polymer chains had the ability to lower the interfacial tension between the PMMA and PS phases. Also, the effect of thermal annealing on the morphology of commercial polymer/composite latex polymer blends was examined. The result showed that the core‐shell composite latex had the ability to enhance the compatibility of the components of polymer blends. The compatibilizing ability of the core‐shell composite latex was better than that of a random copolymer. Moreover, the effect of the amount of core‐shell composite latex on the morphology of the polymer blend was investigated. The polymer blends, which contained composite latex above 50% wt, showed the morphology of a double sea‐island structure. In addition, the composite latex was completely dissolved in solvent to destroy the core‐shell structure and release the entangled polymer chains, and then dried to form the entangled free composite polymer. The entangled free composite polymer had the ability to enhance the compatibility of the components of the polymer blend as usual. The weight ratio 3/7 commercial polymer/entangled free composite polymer blend showed the morphology of the phase inversion structure. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 312–321, 2003     

Enthalpic effects on interfacial adhesion of immiscible polymers compatibilized with block copolymers

The influence of enthalpic interactions on interfacial adhesion between immiscible polymer matrices and reinforcing block copolymer segments has been studied using the transmission electron microscopic (TEM) methodology of Creton et al. We examined the behaviour of four statistical styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers, each having different acrylonitrile (AN) content, blended with polystyrene (PS) as the minor component, and reinforced by three poly(methyl methacrylate-b-styrene) (PMMA-b-PS) block copolymers of differing molar masses, viz. 20000, 65000 and 680000 g mol⁻¹. These observations were compared with similar experiments on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blended with PS and reinforced by PMMA-b-PS. Emulsification was observed with all three PMMA-b-PS copolymers. Crazes were formed in the SAN matrices and a statistical evaluation of interfacial failures was performed on the discrete PS domains that lay within the crazes. For the two block copolymers of higher molar mass, optimal reinforcement of the interfaces was observed independent of the SAN composition. With the 20000 block copolymer, however, the pattern of the interfacial failure depended strongly on the SAN composition. Specifically, it was observed that the fraction of the discrete particles that suffered interfacial failure, and led to the creation of large voids in the crazes in these blends, increased with increased AN content of the SAN matrix. Thus, we found that the fraction of discrete PS particles that produce large voids in crazes of blends containing SAN33 is always higher than in blends containing SAN15, when reinforced with the 20000 PMMA-b-PS. We infer that the critical molar mass required of a mechanically reinforcing copolymer depends on the short-range (attractive and repulsive) interactions between the blend components in the interfacial region. The TEM method could not, however, distinguish between reinforced and neat PMMA/PS blends, all of which showed strong adhesion. This is attributed to the comparatively diffuse interface in the PMMA/PS system, a consequence of the relatively weak repulsion between these two polymers.     

Effects of processing conditions and copolymer molecular weight on the mechanical properties and morphology of compatibilized polymer blends

The mechanical properties and morphology of melt mixed polystyrene (PS)/polyethylene (PE) blends that were modified by the addition of up to 16% of a semicrystalline PS-b-hPB (hydrogenated polybutadiene) diblock copolymer with varying molecular weight are reported. As a result of the blocks of the copolymer penetrating the corresponding homopolymers, these diblock copolymers are capable of reinforcing the PS/PE interface significantly. This increase in interfacial strength between the immiscible blend components does not necessarily result in an improvement in the mechanical properties of the blends as measured by Izod or tensile tests. This may be because the effect of the copolymers on the rheological properties of the blends during processing outweighs their emulsifying/reinforcing effects. If found to be universally true for polymer blends, these results suggest that the relationship between the effects of copolymers on interfacial strength, their emulsifying effects, and the mechanical properties of copolymer modified blends are not as simple as suggested by many statements found in the literature.     

Formation of phase structure and crystallization behavior in blends containing polystyrene–polyethylene block copolymers

The microphase separation structure in the molten state and the structure formation in crystallization from such ordered melt were investigated for the blends of polystyrene–polyethylene block copolymers (SE) with polystyrene homopolymer (PS) and polyethylene homopolymer (PE) and for the blends consisting of two kinds of SE with different copolymer compositions from each other, using synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering techniques (SAXS). The copolymer compositions of SE block copolymers employed were 0.34, 0.58 and 0.73 wt. fraction of PE, and their melt morphologies were cylindrical, lamellar and lamellar, respectively. Macrophase separation or the morphology change in the melt occurred depending on the molecular weight and the blend composition, as reported so far. In crystallization from such macrophase-separated and microphase-separated melts, the melt morphology was completely kept for all the blends. Crystallization behavior was also investigated for the blends. The crystallization within the spherical and cylindrical domains surrounded by glassy PS was not observed for SE/PS blends. In the crystallization from the macrophase-separated melt, two exothermal peaks were observed in the DSC measurements, while a single peak was observed for other blends. For the blends with PS, the degree of crystallinity was depressed and the apparent activation energy of crystallization was high, compared to those for the corresponding neat SE. For SE/PE and SE/SE blends, those were changed depending on the blend composition.     

Influence of nanoparticle-polymer interactions on the apparent migration behaviour of carbon nanotubes in an immiscible polymer blend

We investigate the influence of nanoparticle-polymer interactions on the apparent migration behavior of multiwall carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in an immiscible polymer blend of ethylene-acrylate copolymer (EA) and polyamide 12 (PA). The polymer-CNTs interaction is tuned by using different surface modification strategies, comprising grafting and coating. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polystyrene (PS) are chosen as surface modifiers. The nanocomposite materials are prepared by melt-blending polymer-modified-CNTs in EA and PA. Polymer-grafted-CNTs tend to concentrate at the PA/EA interface, even if predispersed in PA, as opposed to pristine CNTs, which stay inside PA under the same circumstances. This new behavior is consistent with the morphology of PA/EA/(PMMA or PS) ternary blends and suggest a dominance of interfacial thermodynamics on CNTs localization. If we use polymer-coated-CNTs instead, the behavior depends on molar mass of the coating polymer. For low molar mass, it is similar to that of pristine CNTs and indicates desorption of the coating, owing to the weak interaction with the CNTs surface. Interestingly, we observe that long PS chains do not desorb and can drive the CNTs to the interface of the PA/EA blend. Moreover, the influence of kinetics is clearly observed through the dependence of CNTs interfacial confinement on dispersed droplet size.     

Compatibilization Mechanism of Nanoclay in Immiscible PS/PMMA Blend Using Unmodified Nanoclay

Organically modified nanoclays have been reported to play the role of a compatibilizer for immiscible polymer blends. However, the mechanism of compatibilization by nanoclay has been reported differently. In this work, we investigated the exact mechanism of compatibilization of nanoclay in immiscible polystyrene (PS)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blend in the presence of sodium-montmorillonite (Na-MMT) through selective dispersion of clay in the matrix phase. Through a detailed investigation of the morphology of PS/PMMA/Na-MMT blend nanocomposites, the plausible mechanism behind the compatibilization effect of clay in immiscible blends has been proposed.     

Compatibility and biodegradability of blendsof starch cinnamate with various polymers

The compatibility of blends of starch cinnamate (StCn) with polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), and styrene acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) has been examined through viscometry at 30°C. The results of the three systems are compared with the already reported PMMA/StCn system. From the intrinsic viscosity, relative viscosity, reduced viscosity, and density measurements the PVC/StCn and SAN/StCn blends were found to be compatible while PS/StCn blend was found to be incompatible. The compatibility of the blends was also confirmed by SEM analysis. The compatibility of these blends based on heat of mixing and polymer-polymer interaction parameter was also examined. Blends were observed to be compatible on the basis of heat of mixing theory but not on the basis of polymer - polymer interaction parameters. Biodegradation studies of compatible blends containing 30% StCn showed 13%, 15%, 18%, and 23% weight loss in case of PMMA, SAN, and PVC blends after 120 days.     

A study on weld line morphology and mechanical strength of injection molded polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

In this work, the mechanical strength and weld line morphology of injection molded polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS/PMMA) blends were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical property test. The experimental results show that the tensile strength of PS/PMMA blends get greatly decreased due to the presence of the weld line. Although the tensile strength without the weld line of PS/PMMA (70/30) is much higher than that of the PS/PMMA (30/70) blend, their tensile strength with weld line shows reversed change. The viscosity ratio of dispersed phase over matrix is a very important parameter for control of weld‐line morphology of the immiscible polymer blend. In PS/PMMA (70/30) blend, the PMMA dispersed domains at the core of the weld line are spherically shaped, which is the same as bulk. While in the PS/PMMA (30/70) blend, the viscosity of the dispersed PS phase is lower than that of the PMMA matrix, the PS phase is absent at the weld line, and PS particles are highly oriented parallel to the weld line, which is a stress concentrator. This is why weld line strength of PS/PMMA (30/70) is lower than that of PS/PMMA (70/30) blend. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 1856–1865, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10450     

Monte Carlo simulation of the compatibility of graft copolymer compatibilized two incompatible homopolymer blends: Effect of graft structure

Compatibility of graft copolymer compatibilized two incompatible homopolymer A and B blends was simulated by using Monte Carlo method in a two‐dimensional lattice model. The copolymers with various graft structures were introduced in order to study the effect of graft structure on the compatibility. Simulation results showed that incorporation of both A‐g‐B (A was backbone) and B‐g‐A (B was backbone) copolymers could much improve the compatibility of the blends. However, A‐g‐B copolymer was more effective to compatibilize the blend if homopolymer A formed dispersed phase. Furthermore, simulation results indicated that A‐g‐B copolymers tended to locate at the interface and anchor two immiscible components when the side chain is relatively long. However, most of A‐g‐B copolymers were likely to be dispersed into the dispersed homopolymer A phase domains if the side chains were relatively short. On the other hand, B‐g‐A copolymers tended to be dispersed into the matrix formed by homopolymer B. Moreover, it was found that more and more B‐g‐A copolymers were likely to form thin layers at the phase interface with decreasing the length of side chain. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Miscibility and carbon dioxide transport properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (iPHB) and its blends with different copolymers of styrene and vinyl phenol

This work summarizes the miscibility and transport properties of different polymer blends obtained by mixing a bacterial, isotactic poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (iPHB) with copolymers of styrene and vinyl phenol (Sty-co-VPh copolymers). Given that iPHB and pure commodity poly(styrene) (PS) form immiscible blends, PS has been modified by copolymerizing it with vinyl phenol (VPh) units, in an attempt to promote blend miscibility. VPh units have appropriate functional groups that interact with iPHB ester moieties. The potential miscibility was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measuring the glass transition temperatures of blends of different compositions. As an additional test, the interaction parameter between the two components, using the iPHB melting point depression caused by the second component, was also measured. Copolymers containing less than 90% styrene showed miscibility with iPHB.Given the remarkable barrier properties of iPHB to gases and vapours, the study has been completed by measuring transport properties of carbon dioxide through different iPHB/Sty-co-VPh copolymer blends, using gravimetric sorptions in a Cahn electrobalance. A clear difference was observed between the behaviour of rubbery blends and those that exhibit a glassy behaviour at the selected experimental temperature (303 K).     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Synthesis of a graft copolymer from an ozonized polycarbonate and its application as a compatibilizer

The polycarbonate (PC)/polystyrene (PS) blend is an immiscible system. The use of copolymers as compatibilizers in blends is one approach that is being developed within the larger field of polymer alloys. In this study, PC was ozonized to create peroxides and hydroperoxides on the polymer chain. These functional groups under heating conditions were used to initiate the radical polymerization of styrene (vinyl monomers) to give graft copolymers. The first part of this study was dedicated to the examination of the kinetics of the styrene polymerization initiated by an ozonized PC. However, the structure of the graft copolymers was confirmed by IR spectroscopy, and the molecular weight of the PS graft chain was determined by gel permeation chromatography. The compatibilized bends were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer. The morphologies of the PC/PS/graft copolymer blend were examined by transmission electron microscopy and were finer than those of an uncompatibilized blend. The tensile properties of these blends were also investigated. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Polyacrylate-N-vinyl lactam polymer or copolymer blends as pressure-sensitive adhesives

It has been previously shown that blends of a homopolymer or a copolymer of an N-vinyl lactam with an acrylate or a related copolymer containing a small proportion of acidic groups exhibit macroscale compatibility and a phase separated microstructure. This paper presents an application of this two-phase polymer system for the preparation of melt processable acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSA). 2-Ethylhexyl acrylate-acrylic acid copolymers, having molecular weights in the range of 50 000 to 115 000 were prepared by free-radical solution polymerization. These copolymers were tacky but possessed insufficient cohesive strength at ambient temperatures to be useful as PSAs. Blending such acrylate copolymers, having some acidic functionality, with minor proportions of a glassy homopolymer or a copolymer of an N-vinyl lactam resulted in materials having a balance of cohesive and adhesive characteristics required of a good PSA. Due to low molecular weights of the components of the polymer blend acrylic PSAs, they are amenable to hot melt processing. Some of the parameters affecting the pressure-sensitive adhesive properties of the polymer blend are: (a) fraction of the glassy polymer in the blend, (b) molecular weights of the polymeric components, (c) acidic functionality of the low molecular weight acrylate copolymer, and (d) N-vinyl lactam functionality of the glassy polymer.     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polymer blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers

The compatibilizing effects of styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymers with various glycidyl methyacrylate (GMA) contents on immiscible blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and polystyrene (PS) were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ¹³C‐solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The epoxy functional groups in the SG copolymer were able to react with the PTT end groups (? COOH or ? OH) to form SG‐g‐PTT copolymers during melt processing. These in situ–formed graft copolymers tended to reside along the interface to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interfacial adhesion. The compatibilized PTT/PS blend possessed a smaller phase domain, higher viscosity, and better tensile properties than did the corresponding uncompatibilized blend. For all compositions, about 5% GMA in SG copolymer was found to be the optimum content to produce the best compatibilization of the blend. This study demonstrated that SG copolymers can be used efficiently in compatibilizing polymer blends of PTT and PS. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2247–2252, 2003     

Investigation of polymer blends of polyamide-6 and poly(methyl methacrylate) synthesized by RAFT polymerization

Morphological and thermal properties of immiscible and incompatible polymer blends of commercial polyamide-6 (PA-6) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) synthesized via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization have been studied in the presence of a compatibilizer consisting of either a random copolymer of styrene-maleic anhydride (SMA) or a diblock copolymer poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene (PMMA-PS) also synthesized via RAFT polymerization. Blends of PA-6/PMMA were obtained by extrusion mixing. During melt compounding in the extruder, the functional groups of the polymer components were reacted in the presence of a compatibilizer, which changed considerably the morphology of the blend. After compatibilization, particles of PMMA in the PA-6 were smaller and better dispersed. The morphology and thermal properties of the blends were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DCS).     

Elongational viscosity for miscible and immiscible polymer blends. II. Blends with a small amount of UHMW polymer

The effect of miscibility on elongational viscosity of polymer blends was investigated in homogeneous, miscible, and immiscible states by the blend of 1.5 wt % of ultrahigh‐molecular‐weight (UHMW) polymer. The matrix polymer was either poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), or poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐styrene) (AS) that has a comparable elongational viscosity value. The homogeneous blend consisted of 98.5 wt % of PMMA and 1.5 wt % of UHMW–PMMA. The miscible blend was composed of AS and UHMW–PMMA at the same ratio. The immiscible blend was a combination of AS and UHMW–polystyrene (PS) at the same ratio. The strain‐hardening behavior of the different blends were compared with that of pure PMMA. It was demonstrated that 1.5 wt % of UHMW induces a strong strain‐hardening property in the homogeneous and miscible blends but was hardly changed in the immiscible blend. The optical microscope observation of the immiscible blend suggested that the UHMW domains were stretched, but that the degree of domain deformation was less than a given elongational strain. It was concluded that the strain‐hardening property is strongly affected by the miscibility of UHMW chain and matrix. The strong strain‐hardening property is caused by the deformation of the UHMW polymer. UHMW chains are stretched when they are entangled with surrounding polymers. However, UHMW chains in an immiscible state are not so deformed because of viscosity difference and no entanglements between domain and matrix. A smaller degree of UHMW chain deformation in immiscible state results in weaker strain‐hardening property. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 961–969, 1999     

Self‐assembled structures in blends of disordered and lamellar block copolymers: SAXS,SANS and TEM study

BACKGROUND: The phase behaviour of copolymers and their blends is of great interest due to the phase transitions, self‐assembly and formation of ordered structures. Phenomena associated with the microdomain morphology of parent copolymers and phase behaviour in blends of deuterated block copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), i.e. (dPS‐block‐dPMMA)₁/(dPS‐block‐PMMA)₂, were investigated using small‐angle X‐ray scattering, small‐angle neutron scattering and transmission electron microscopy as a function of molecular weight, concentration of added copolymers and temperature. RESULTS: Binary blends of the diblock copolymers having different molecular weights and different original micromorphology (one copolymer was in a disordered state and the others were of lamellar phase) were prepared by a solution‐cast process. The blends were found to be completely miscible on the molecular level at all compositions, if their molecular weight ratio was smaller than about 5. The domain spacing D of the blends can be scaled with M_n by D ～ M_n^2/3 as predicted by a previously published postulate (originally suggested and proved for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers). CONCLUSIONS: The criterion for forming a single‐domain morphology (molecularly mixed blend) taking into account the different solubilization of copolymer blocks has been applied to explain the changes in microdomain morphology during the self‐assembling process in two copolymer blends. Evidently the criterion, suggested originally for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers, can be employed to a much broader range of block copolymer blends. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry