Mammographic findings of recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: comparison with the primary tumor

PURPOSE: To compare the mammographic findings of recurrent breast cancer with those of the primary tumor in patients who underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms were reviewed of primary and recurrent tumors in 25 patients (26 lesions). Mammographic appearance, location, and histopathologic characteristics were retrospectively compared between primary and recurrent tumors. RESULTS: Primary and recurrent tumors were mammographically similar in 21 (81%) of the 26 lesions. Of 14 primary tumors with calcifications, 12 (86%) recurred with calcifications, and of the 12 masses, nine (75%) recurred as masses. Recurrent tumors that occurred in the lumpectomy quadrant were more often similar in mammographic appearance to the primary tumor (20 of 22 tumors) than those in other quadrants (one of four tumors) (P < .02). CONCLUSION: After conservative treatment of breast cancer, the majority of recurrent tumors appear to be mammographically similar to primary tumors. It is prudent to review preoperative mammograms during follow-up of patients after lumpectomy and radiation therapy.     

An alternative technique in the management of bullous emphysema. Thoracoscopic endoloop ligation of bullae

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review revealed 162 women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy from 1978 to 1990 for whom follow-up data were available. Subsequent to therapy, 33 (20%) patients had a pathologically proven carcinoma in the treated breast. Mammograms at the time of local recurrence were available for 20 patients. We reviewed mammograms, clinical charts, and histopathologic findings in these 20 patients. For 14 of 20 patients, we also reviewed mammograms obtained at the time of the original DCIS. RESULTS: The median interval from diagnosis of the original DCIS to local recurrence was 26 months (range, 6-168 months). Recurrences were detected solely by mammography in 17 (85%) of 20 patients, by mammography and physical examination in two (10%), and solely by physical examination in one (5%). Eighteen (90%) local recurrence contained calcifications and eighteen (90%) involved the tumorectomy quadrant. When we compared available mammographic findings of the original DCIS and the local recurrence we found the mammographic pattern and calcification morphology to be the same in 11 (79%) of 14 DCIS and nine (82%) of 11 DCIS, respectively. Histopathologic analysis of recurrences found DCIS in 13 (65%) of 20 patients and DCIS and infiltrating carcinoma in the remaining seven (35%) patients. Of 13 pure DCIS recurrences, 12 (92%) were detected solely by mammography. CONCLUSION: In our study, local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for DCIS invariably contained DCIS; 35% of recurrences also contained invasive carcinoma. The most common mammographic pattern of local recurrence was calcifications in the tumorectomy quadrant that were morphologically similar to the original DCIS. These findings suggest that many of these local recurrences reflect failure to eradicate the primary DCIS. Mammography achieved high sensitivity in revealing these lesions: 85% of local recurrences and 92% of recurrences that were pure DCIS were detected solely by mammography.     

Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17

PURPOSE: In 1993, findings from a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial to evaluate the worth of radiation therapy after lumpectomy concluded that the combination was more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for localized intraductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS). This report extends those findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (N = 818) with localized DCIS were randomly assigned to lumpectomy or lumpectomy plus radiation (50 Gy). Tissue was removed so that resected specimen margins were histologically tumor-free. Mean follow-up time was 90 months (range, 67 to 130). Size and method of tumor detection were determined by central clinical, mammographic, and pathologic assessment. Life-table estimates of event-free survival and survival, average annual rates of occurrence for specific events, relative risks for event-specific end points, and cumulative probability of specific events comprising event-free survival are presented. RESULTS: The benefit of lumpectomy plus radiation was virtually unchanged between 5 and 8 years of follow-up and was due to a reduction in invasive and noninvasive ipsilateral breast tumors (IBTs). Incidence of locoregional and distant events remained similar in both treatment groups; deaths were only infrequently related to breast cancer. Incidence of noninvasive IBT was reduced from 13.4% to 8.2% (P = .007), and of invasive IBT, from 13.4% to 3.9% (P < .0001). All cohorts benefited from radiation regardless of clinical or mammographic tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: Through 8 years of follow-up, our findings continue to indicate that lumpectomy plus radiation is more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for women with localized, mammographically detected DCIS. When evaluated according to the mammographic characteristics of their DCIS, all groups benefited from radiation.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation of pathologic and mammographic features with extent of disease

Optimal treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast requires an improved understanding of its pathologic extent and propensity for local recurrence. This study was performed to analyze mammographic and pathologic features of DCIS that might predict the extent of disease within the breast and facilitate treatment selection between lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy and radiotherapy, and mastectomy. At our institution, 60 cases of DCIS were diagnosed in 59 patients from June 1985 to February 1995 and form the basis of this retrospective study. Demographic and treatment-related information was obtained from hospital and tumor registry records. Mammograms were reviewed and size estimates of the abnormalities were determined. Pathologic slides from all cases were reviewed and classified according to size group, focality, nuclear grade, necrosis, and histologic subtype. DNA ploidy status and proliferation indices were available for 28 patients. Pathologically, 43 (72%) cases were < 15 mm, 14 (23%) were 16 to 40 mm, and 3 (5%) were > 40 mm. Five (8%) of the lesions were multicentric, 28 (47%) focal, and 27 (45%) multifocal. Thirty-three (55%) patients were treated by mastectomy, 16 (27%) by lumpectomy alone, and 11 (18%) by lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Mammographic size, histologic grade, presence or absence of necrosis, histologic subtype, DNA ploidy, and proliferative index were compared with pathologic size and focality by chi 2 analysis. Mammographic size correlated significantly with pathologic size (chi 2 = 11.3; P = 0.02) but underestimated the extent of disease in 9 cases. Although focality correlated significantly with pathologic size (chi 2 = 15.8; P = 0.003), the remaining histopathologic features did not significantly correlate with pathologic size or focality. Histopathologic features, including DNA studies, do not reliably predict the pathologic extent of DCIS, but mammographic size and focality do significantly correlate with pathologic size. Nevertheless, most cases of DCIS are small focal or multifocal lesions that are amenable to breast conservation approaches; further studies are needed to determine the appropriate use of lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and mastectomy in the treatment of DCIS.     

The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation

BACKGROUND: The impact of the surgical margin status on long-term local control rates for breast cancer in women treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy is unclear. METHODS: The records of 289 women with 303 invasive breast cancers who were treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy from 1972 to 1992 were reviewed. The surgical margin was classified as positive (transecting the inked margin), close (less than or equal to 2 mm from the margin), negative, or indeterminate, based on the initial biopsy findings and reexcision specimens, as appropriate. Various clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for local recurrence in addition to the margin status, including T classification, N classification, age, histologic features, and use of adjuvant therapy. The mean follow-up was 6.25 years. RESULTS: The actuarial probability of freedom from local recurrence for the entire group of patients at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 87%, respectively. The actuarial probability of local control at 10 years was 98% for those patients with negative surgical margins versus 82% for all others (P = 0.007). The local control rate at 10 years was 97% for patients who underwent reexcision and 84% for those who did not. Reexcision appears to convey a local control benefit for those patients with close, indeterminate, or positive initial margins, when negative final margins are attained (P = 0.0001). Final margin status was the most significant determinant of local recurrence rates in univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the final margin status and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The attainment of negative surgical margins, initially or at the time of reexcision, is the most significant predictor of local control after breast-conserving treatment with lumpectomy and radiation therapy.     

Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma

The increased use of screening mammography has resulted in a marked increase in detected cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast since the early 1980s. In 1993, there were an estimated 23,275 newly diagnosed cases of DCIS in the United States, of which 4,676 were in women aged 40-49. DCIS accounted for 14.7% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers in women aged 40-49 in 1993, and perhaps 40% of all mammographically detected breast cancers in this age group are DCIS. Among women aged 40-49, an estimated 1,890 mastectomies and 2,707 lumpectomies (with or without radiation) were performed for DCIS in 1993. There is an urgent need to better understand the relationship of mammographically detected DCIS to invasive and potentially life-threatening breast cancer. Better information about the appropriate treatment of DCIS is also needed to reduce the confusion and uncertainty many women and their physicians currently experience in the face of a DCIS diagnosis. For the present, women considering screening mammography should be told the likelihood of being diagnosed with DCIS and that only some DCIS cases may be clinically significant but almost all will be treated surgically.     

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and psychiatric adjustment in late adolescence

Large-core (14g) needle biopsy (CNB) of the breast is a new diagnostic modality increasingly being used to evaluate patients with mammographic abnormalities. Two hundred twenty-four CNBs were performed on 198 patients. Surgical follow-up was available in 64 cases (28.6%). Overall concordance rate was 93.8% (60 of 64 cases). Of the four discordant cases, two were diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) on CNB; on excision, these cases showed cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); two remaining cases, diagnosed on CNB as ADH versus DCIS, showed invasive carcinoma (DCIS with invasive component and infiltrating cribriform carcinoma, respectively) on excisional biopsy. Malignancy, primary (52) or metastatic (5), was identified in 57 cases (25.4%); 47 of these patients underwent surgical excision, and the diagnosis was confirmed in all of these cases. Of 51 cases with radiographic evidence of microcalcifications, 48 (94%) had microcalcifications in the CNB: 30 (62.5%) were benign, 11 (22.9%) were malignant, and 7 (14.6%) were diagnosed as ADH. In the remaining three cases (1.3%), only benign breast tissue without microcalcifications was seen, and the lesion was considered to have been missed. Biopsy specimens were obtained from 173 lesions because of the presence of a mass: 125 (72.3%) were benign, 45 (26%) were malignant, and 3 (1.7%) were diagnosed as ADH. Follow-up was available in 118 patients with benign lesions: all were mammographically stable or decreased at 6 or 12 months; no follow-up was available for the remaining patients. CNB of the breast is a highly sensitive (96.9%) and specific (100%) technique for management of patients with mammographic abnormalities. The histologic findings should be correlated with the mammographic appearance, and an attempt should be made to achieve a specific diagnosis in all lesions, particularly masses. The diagnosis of ADH should always prompt excisional biopsy because of a high frequency of false-negative results caused by sampling errors or underestimation.     

The benefits of mammography are not limited to women of ages older than 50 years

BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of mammography are established in women age < or = 50 years, its use in women age < 50 years is controversial. It is the purpose of this study to determine whether the better outcome in mammographically detected breast carcinoma compared with clinically detected breast carcinoma observed in women age > or = 50 years also is observed in women age < 50 years. METHODS: The authors analyzed 869 cases of Stage I and II breast carcinoma in women treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1984-1994. The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 3-128 months). Three hundred and eighteen patients (37%) presented with mammographic abnormalities without clinical signs of disease and 551 patients (63%) presented with clinical signs of disease. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 22-88 years). Three hundred and four patients (35%) were age < 50 years. RESULTS: Mammographically detected tumors in women age < 50 years were of similar size to those in women age > or = 50 years (median 1.1 cm vs. 1.0 cm). Axillary lymph node involvement and tumor grade were not significantly different between these two groups. However, in women age < 50 years the clinically detected tumors were found to be significantly larger, more likely to be axillary lymph node positive, and of higher grade compared with tumors in older women. Consequently, in patients with mammographically detected tumors, there was no significant difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) between women age < 50 years compared with women age > or = 50 years (90% and 92%, respectively; P=0.4), whereas in patients with clinically detected tumors there was a significant difference in 5-year RFS (77% vs. 87%, respectively; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Mammography results in the diagnosis of smaller and lower grade breast carcinoma. If mammographically detected, there appears to be no difference in RFS between women age < 50 years and those women age > or = 50 but there is a difference if the tumors are clinically detected. If left to grow to the size necessary for clinical detectability, the disease appears to be more aggressive in younger women.     

The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours

This study was carried out to assess the frequency of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) occurring within and surrounding grade 3 invasive tumours and the effect of its detection on size and nodal stage of invasive carcinomas at mammographic detection. Grade 3 tumours with either no associated DCIS or DCIS only within the invasive component were significantly larger in size than tumours with surrounding DCIS (P < 0.02) and were less likely to be under or equal to 10 mm in size (0% or 13% vs 30% respectively, P < 0.02). Tumours with mammographic calcification were more likely to be less than or equal to 10 mm in size than non-calcific tumours (32% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.05). This was because of the high frequency of tumours less than or equal to 10 mm in size in the linear/branching calcification group. Tumours showing calcification without a mass also appear to be a group with good prognostic features, with a mean size of 13 mm, 33% being 10 mm or less in size and only 17% being node positive. We have found that the presence of surrounding DCIS enables earlier detection of grade 3 invasive carcinomas because of the presence of mammographically visible calcification. Detection of calcification suggestive of DCIS should remain an important part of mammographic screening.     

Target volume and indications of radiotherapy in breast carcinoma

Breast-conserving surgery is now commonly used to treat breast cancer. While mastectomy has been the traditional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ, it is felt to be excessive in most cases. A great effort has been made to identify pathobiological characteristics of DCIS that can be used to identify patients best suited for wide local excision vs. wide local excision and breast irradiation. Mastectomy and conservative surgery plus irradiation offer a similar outcome in patients with early stage invasive breast cancer. Radiotherapy has not been shown to improve survival but is able to reduce significantly the rate of local recurrence, which is regarded as a very undesirable outcome. There is still controversy concerning the necessity of irradiation of the breast in all patients. Analysis of predictors of outcome cannot identify a subgroup of patients with a very low risk for local breast recurrence who might not require radiation therapy. In premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients XRT has a beneficial effect not only on locoregional but also on systemic recurrences. Radiotherapy has to be integrated for a pre- or postoperative consolidation in new treatment concepts for locally advanced breast cancer which use primary chemotherapy and immediate or subsequent breast radiation. Radiation of internal mammary chain and supraclavicular fossa after conservative surgery does not lead to an increase in clinically important skin or pulmonary complications. Its role is being evaluated in current multicentre studies.     

Does the placement of surgical clips within the excision cavity influence local control for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and irradiation

PURPOSE: A number of authors have demonstrated the importance of using surgical clips to define the tumor bed in the treatment planning of early-stage breast cancer. The clips have been useful in delineating the borders of the tangential fields, especially for very medial and very lateral lesions as the boost volume. If surgical clips better define the tumor bed, then a reduction in true or marginal recurrences should be appreciated. We sought to compare the incidence of breast recurrence in women with and without surgical clips, controlling for other recognized prognostic factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1980 and 1992, 1364 women with clinical Stage I or II invasive breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and definitive irradiation. Median follow-up was 60 months. Median age was 55 years. Seventy-one percent of patients were path NO, 22% had one to three nodes, and 7% had > than four nodes. Sixty-one percent were ER positive and 44% PR positive. Margin status was negative in 62%, positive in 10%, close in 9%, and unknown in 19%. Fifty-seven percent of women underwent a reexcision. Adjuvant chemotherapy + tamoxifen was administered in 29%, and tamoxifen alone in 17%. Surgical clips were placed in the excision cavity in 556 patients, while the other 808 did not have clips placed. All patients had a boost of the tumor bed. Patients had their boost planned with CT scanning or stereo shift radiographs. No significant differences between the two groups were noted for median age, T stage, nodal status, race, ER/PR receptor status, region irradiated, or tumor location. Patients without clips had negative margins less often, a higher rate of unknown or positive margins and more often received no adjuvant therapy compared to patients with surgical clips. RESULTS: Twenty-five and 27 patients with and without surgical clips, respectively, developed a true or marginal recurrence in the treated breast. The actuarial probability of a breast recurrence was 2% at 5 years and 5% at 10 years for patients without clips compared to 5 and 11%, respectively, for patients with clips (p=0.01). Comparing the breast recurrence rates for patients with and without clips there was no significant difference for the following factors: chemotherapy, tamoxifen, negative, positive or close margins, reexcision, N1, and central or inner primary. Increased rates of breast recurrence were noted for patients with clips for the following variables: no adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001), unknown margins (p < 0.001), a single excision (p = 0.003), path NO (p = 0.001), and outer location (p= 0.02). A forward stepwise multivariate analysis for all 1364 patients was performed using the aforementioned variables as well as the presence or absence of surgical clips and the primary surgeon. The surgeon (p = 0.03) and no adjuvant treatment (p = 0.01) significantly influenced breast recurrence. For patients with surgical clips the 10 year isolated breast recurrence rate was 21% for a single surgeon vs. 6% in the remainder of the group (p = 0.01). For patients with clips, this surgeon had unknown margins in 48% of cases compared to 10% overall (p = 0.001). Excluding this surgeon from analysis the isolated breast recurrence for patients with clips was 6 vs. 5% for patients without clips (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a significant difference in the 10-year breast recurrence rate favoring women without clips despite more adverse prognostic factors. There was no difference in the breast recurrence rate for patients with or without surgical clips if careful attention to margin status was addressed. Failure to ink the surgical specimen resulting in unknown margins cannot be compensated for with the placement of .     

Extracapsular axillary node extension in patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy: an indication for radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review into the patterns of failure of 82 patients with Stage II or III breast cancer who had extracapsular extension (ECE) of axillary nodal metastases and who received systemic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy without loco-regional radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical records of patients with axillary node positive (T1-T3, N1, 2) Stage II or III breast cancer seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre between 1980-1989 were reviewed. Patients were identified who underwent segmental mastectomy with axillary node dissection or modified radical mastectomy and received adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen but did not undergo loco-regional radiation. Eighty-two patients within this group had pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension (ECE). For 45 of these patients the extension was extensive, and for the remaining 37 it was microscopic. This ECE-positive group was compared to a subgroup of 172 patients who did not have pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension but had metastatic carcinoma confined within the nodal capsule. RESULTS: Median age of the 82 ECE-positive patients was 56 years. Twenty-five patients had had a segmental mastectomy, the remainder a modified radical mastectomy. Median actuarial survival was 60 months, with a median disease-free and loco-regional failure-free survival of 38 months. Seventy-eight percent of these patients developed a recurrence, which was loco-regional in 60% (21% local, 21% regional, 2% local and regional, and 16% loco-regional and metastatic). There was a 36% recurrence rate in intact breast, 14% the chest wall following modified radical mastectomy, 7% relapsed in the axilla, 12% in supraclavicular nodes, and 1% in the internal mammary nodes. A comparison of the 82 ECE-positive patients with a group of 172 ECE-negative patients determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival (overall and disease-free) and loco-regional recurrence. Univariate analysis of the entire 254 node-positive patient group revealed extracapsular nodal extension (ECE) to be a prognostically significant factor for actuarial and disease-free survival as well as for loco-regional failure, but ECE did not remain an independently prognostic factor after multivariate analysis. Segmental mastectomy, positive resection margins, and ER negative status increased the risk of loco-regional recurrence within the ECE-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Extracapsular axillary node extension is a prognostically significant factor for actuarial survival, disease-free survival, and loco-regional failure but not independent of other adverse prognostic factors. It is a marker for increased loco-regional recurrence associated with doubling of breast, chest wall, and supraclavicular recurrence rates. The risk of axillary relapse in patients who have had an adequate level I and II axillary dissection but demonstrate extracapsular extension is low (7%). We recommend breast/chest wall and supraclavicular radiation for all patients with pathologic evidence of such extranodal extension who have had a level I and II axillary dissection regardless of the number of positive axillary nodes. Axillary irradiation should be considered for patients who have had only an axillary sampling or level I axillary dissection.     

Docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in retinal phospholipids of piglets fed an infant formula enriched with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: effects of egg phospholipids and fish oils with different ratios of eicosapentaenoic acid to docosahexaenoic acid

The purpose of our study was the assessment of the diagnostic value of vacuum core biopsy, which promises high accuracy by minimally invasive percutaneous excision of 1-2 cm3 of tissue. The materials used were a digital stereotaxic biopsy table (Fischer Imaging) and a Mammotome-gun (Biopsys). A total of 236 patients with 261 predominantly indeterminate lesions (indeterminate: 230; suspicious: 26; malignant: 5) underwent vacuum core biopsy (VCB). Verification was as follows: (a) demonstration of complete or partial removal of the lesion or replacement of the lesion by a small hematoma by comparison of the pre- and post-VCB mammogram; (b) reexcision of 45 malignant and 6 borderline lesions; (c) radiologic-histologic correlation; and (d) 6-month-follow-up mammograms in 129 cases. Two VCBs were not possible because very fine microcalcifications could not be visualized. Two puncture errors occurred which, however, were immediately recognized and VCB was repeated. Based on the above verification a 100 % accuracy was achieved. No relevant side effects occurred. Except for 2 cases mammographically hardly any scarring was visible. Based on the excellent accuracy and excellent tolerance of the procedure VCB appears to be the future method of choice for the workup of those indeterminate mammographically detected lesions that up to now have still required surgical biopsy.     

Metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma: a report of three cases

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the diagnosis and treatment of women with pathologic nipple discharge caused by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Women with unilateral spontaneous bloody, serous, or brown nipple discharge who presented between January 1, 1988 and August 1, 1996 were identified by retrospective chart review. Women with nonspontaneous, physiologic discharge were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven women with a mean age of 59.5 years (range, 24 to 88 years) underwent duct exploration and biopsy for pathologic discharge, with 43 (15.5%) found to have DCIS. The discharge was bloody in 29, clear in eight, and brown in six women. Seven of 12 (58%) women with an associated breast mass were found to have a microinvasive component with the DCIS. Discharge cytology showed malignant cells in only two of 12 (16%) women examined. A ductogram was performed on 20 women, with filling defects seen in 10, ectasia in 3, narrowing in 4, and normal ducts in 3. The DCIS included 17 (40%) specimens with cribriform pattern, 17 (40%) micropapillary, 8 (18%) comedo, and 2 (2%) solid. Twelve microinvasive cancers were found in combination with DCIS. After duct exploration, 37 (86%) patients were found to have extensive or multifocal DCIS to the margin, or both, with 32 (74%) patients requiring mastectomy to achieve free surgical margins. There was residual disease in 27 of 32 (84%) mastectomy specimens after initial biopsy. Breast conservation was possible in only 11 (26%) women. Forty of 43 (93%) are disease-free with a median follow-up of 37 months. CONCLUSION: Women presenting with pathologic nipple discharge require duct exploration regardless of cytologic or radiologic findings. When discharge is the result of DCIS, extensiveness of disease in relation to central location and intraductal spread may preclude breast conservation in as many as 27 of 43 (63%) cases.     

Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy

PURPOSE: To assess stereotactic core biopsy for evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 5 calcifications (highly suggestive of malignancy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of mammograms revealed 31 women (aged 34-86 years) with BI-RADS category 5 calcifications who underwent 14-gauge stereotactic core biopsy with an automated gun. Records were reviewed to determine the frequency with which stereotactic core biopsy obviated a surgical procedure. Cost savings were based on Medicare estimates of $472 for stereotactic core biopsy and $1,335 for surgical biopsy. RESULTS: Of 31 patients, stereotactic core biopsy revealed carcinoma in 19 (61%), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in eight (26%), and benign findings discordant with mammographic results in four (13%). Surgical biopsy was recommended for the 12 patients with ADH or benign but discordant core biopsy diagnoses. Of the 19 patients with carcinoma at stereotactic core biopsy, two chose to undergo a second biopsy surgically, two had small foci of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that would have been fully excised with surgical biopsy, one with DCIS at stereotactic core biopsy underwent axillary dissection after invasion was found at surgery, and one underwent excision but had tumor at lumpectomy margins. Thirteen (42%) of 31 patients were spared a surgical procedure, saving $100 per patient. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic core biopsy with an automated gun obviated a surgical procedure in 42% of patients with BI-RADS category 5 calcifications, resulting in modest cost savings in this group.     

MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population

Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center, MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false-negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicions clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR-guided ultrasonographic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x-ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.     

GABAergic stimulation regulates the phenotype of hippocampal interneurons through the regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor

PURPOSE: Information concerning the differences between older and younger women with breast cancer, treated with standard therapy, is lacking from many prospective series. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence treatment decisions and determine if women age 65 and older are treated differently than younger women. The outcomes of older women would then be compared to younger to determine if treatment differences influence outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 558 women with early invasive breast cancer who were treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Four hundred thirty-two women under the age of 65 (range: 24-64) and 126 women age 65 and older (range: 65-85) were assessed for treatment differences including breast reexcision, extent of axillary dissection, extent of breast and nodal irradiation, and the use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Differences in the treatment of the two groups were determined and the end points of local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. RESULTS: The two treatment groups had identical pathologic TNM staging with the exception that 21% of the older age group and 5% of the younger group did not undergo axillary dissection. Women age 65 and older were less likely to have a reexcision, extensive axillary dissection, chemotherapy, or nodal irradiation. They were more likely to receive hormonal therapy. Reexcision in older women was positively influenced by a family history of breast cancer and negatively influenced by a history of previous malignancy. None of the patients who were treated without and axillary dissection suffered a regional recurrence. Although local control was better in older patients, there were no differences in disease-free or overall survival for the two groups. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study reveal that older patients have significant treatment differences as compared to younger patients; however, despite these differences, similar local control and survival were achieved at 5 to 10 years. With the expected survival of older women increasing, the prospective evaluation of treatment options for older women should be considered.     

Local recurrence versus new primary: clinical analysis of 82 breast relapses and potential applications for genetic fingerprinting

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed clinical pathological analysis of breast relapses in patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy in an effort to classify those relapses as true local recurrences or second primary tumors, and to assess the prognostic and therapeutic implications of such a classification system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 990 patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy at our facilities prior to December 1987, 82 patients have experienced a relapse in the conservatively treated breast as the primary site of failure. Patients were classified as having new primary tumors if they fulfilled any one of the following criteria: a) breast relapse occurring at a site distinctly removed from the original tumor; b) histology of the breast relapse compared with the original tumor consistent with a new primary; or c) DNA flow cytometry converting from an aneuploid primary to a diploid relapse. RESULTS: As of 2/92, with a median follow-up of 5.4 years from the time of breast relapse, the overall 5-year survival rate following breast relapse was 55%. Forty-seven patients were classified as true recurrences and 33 patients were classified as new primaries. Patients classified as true recurrences had a shorter median time to breast relapse than patients classified as new primaries (3.16 years vs. 5.42 years, p < .05) and an inferior post breast recurrence survival rate compared to patients classified as new primaries (36% vs. 89%, p < .05). Residual disease outside of the recurrent tumor bed was also noted to be more frequent in patients classified as true recurrences compared to patients classified as new primaries (48% vs. 16%, p < .05). CONCLUSION: Based on the clinical and pathological criteria outlined, it appears that a significant portion of patients experiencing a relapse in the conservatively treated breast may have new primary tumors as opposed to true local relapses. Distinction between a true recurrence and a new primary tumor may have significant prognostic implications. Uncertainties associated with the clinical and pathological criteria are presented and further investigations with genetic fingerprinting techniques to establish the clonality of breast relapses are presented and discussed.     

Long term follow-up of children hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection and randomly treated with ribavirin or placebo

PURPOSE: To determine how many cases of breast cancer might be found if women not known to have the disease were thoroughly examined (the disease "reservoir"). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search from 1966 to the present. STUDY SELECTION: Hospital-based and forensic autopsy series examining women not known to have had breast cancer during life. DATA EXTRACTION: Observed prevalence of occult invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in which the number of women who were given a diagnosis was the numerator and the number of women examined was the denominator. For each autopsy series, we attempted to ascertain the level of scrutiny (sampling method, number of slides examined) given to the pathologic specimens. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among seven autopsy series of women not known to have had breast cancer during life, the median prevalence of invasive breast cancer was 1.3% (range, 0% to 1.8%) and the median prevalence of DCIS was 8.9% (range, 0% to 14.7%). Prevalences were higher among women likely to have been screened (that is, women 40 to 70 years of age). The mean number of slides examined per breast ranged from 9 to 275; series that reported higher levels of scrutiny tended to discover more cases of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial reservoir of DCIS is undetected during life. How hard pathologists look for the disease and, perhaps, their threshold for making the diagnosis are potentially important factors in determining how many cases of DCIS are diagnosed. The latter has important implications for what it means to have the disease.     

One-year reproducibility and stability of the signal amplitude ratio and other variables of the electromyogram: test-retest of a shoulder forward flexion test in female workers with neck and shoulder problems

BACKGROUND: The role of elective contralateral mastectomy (ECM) in women with early-stage breast cancer who elect or require an ipsilateral mastectomy and desire immediate bilateral breast reconstruction (IBR) is an intellectual and emotional dilemma for both patient and physician. In an attempt to clarify the rationale for this approach, we reviewed our experience with ECM and IBR and evaluated operative morbidity, the incidence of occult contralateral breast cancer, and patterns of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 155 patients with primary unilateral breast cancer (stage 0, I, or II) and negative findings on physical and mammographic examinations of the contralateral breast who underwent ipsilateral mastectomy and simultaneous ECM with IBR between 1987 and 1995. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 25 to 69 years). Clinical stage at diagnosis was stage 0, I, and II in 19.4%, 54.2%, and 26.4% of patients, respectively. Factors likely to influence the use of ECM were family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (30%), any family history of breast cancer (56%), difficulty anticipated in contralateral breast surveillance (48%), associated lobular carcinoma in situ (23%), multicentric primary tumor (28%), significant reconstructive issues (14%), and failure of mammographic identification of the primary tumor (16%). Skin-sparing mastectomies were performed in 81% of patients. Overall, 70% of patients underwent reconstruction using autogenous tissue transfer. Reoperations for suspected anastomotic thrombosis were performed in seven patients. Two patients experienced significant partial or complete flap loss. Histopathologic findings in the ECM specimen were as follows: benign, 80% of patients; atypical ductal hyperplasia, 12% of patients; lobular carcinoma in situ, 6.5% of patients; ductal carcinoma in situ, 2.7% of patients; and invasive carcinoma, 1.3% of patients. Eighteen patients (12%) had evidence of locoregional or distant recurrences, with a median follow-up of 3 years. In one patient (0.6%), invasive ductal carcinoma developed on the side of the elective mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECM and IBR cannot be justified if the only oncologic criterion considered is the incidence of occult synchronous contralateral disease. However, in a highly selected population of young patients with a difficult clinical or mammographic examination and an increased lifetime risk of developing a second primary tumor, ECM and IBR is a safe approach.