The localization and functional significance of arylsulfatases in parasitic sarcosporidian protozoa in the tissue-cyst life cycle phase

Ten patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and 10 healthy subjects were studied to determine most discriminative nasal irrigation fluid marker(s) and to compare samples that were collected at baseline and over a 1-hour period, every 15 minutes. The latter were pooled and designated 1-hour sample. In the nasal irrigation we investigated the following inflammatory cells and soluble mediators: eosinophils, neutrophils, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, ECP, EPX, MPO, leukotriene C4, leukotriene B4, prostaglandin E2, tryptase and fibrinogen. Patients with PAR were then treated for 2 weeks with the topical nasal steroid. The only marker that discriminated patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and healthy subjects was eosinophil count (EO%): correspondingly 14.01 +/- 5.8 and 0.18 +/- 0.09, (M +/- SD). Difference between the studied groups did not depend on the time of irrigation, baseline or 1-hour. EO% was also the only marker of a clinically successful treatment with the nasal steroid, 14.01 +/- 5.8 and 0.87 +/- 0.4, before and after treatment respectively. We conclude that EO% is the most sensitive inflammatory marker of perennial allergic rhinitis, and that baseline nasal irrigation can be used to study nasal mucosal inflammation.     

The relationships between nasal hyperreactivity, quality of life, and nasal symptoms in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: A clinical test that could inform the clinician about the severity of a patient's nasal symptoms and health-related quality of life (QOL) would be very useful. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine whether, in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, nasal challenge with histamine could be used to estimate daily symptoms and QOL. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were challenged with histamine to determine nasal hyperreactivity. Nasal response was monitored by the number of sneezes, the amount of secretion, and a symptom score. Daily nasal symptoms were recorded during the 2 preceding weeks. Patients also completed a rhinitis QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Responsiveness to histamine and total daily nasal symptoms were moderately correlated (r = 0.51, p = 0.001). Comparison of total daily nasal symptoms with the overall QOL score showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Nasal response to histamine and overall QOL score were also correlated (r = 0.43, p = 0.002). However, overall QOL and daily nasal symptoms could be predicted by wide 95% confidence intervals only for each decade of nasal responsiveness to histamine (expressed as a composite symptom score). CONCLUSION: In patients with perennial allergic rhinitis nasal hyperreactivity as determined by histamine challenge, QOL, and daily nasal symptoms are moderately correlated. Therefore nasal histamine challenge can be used as a tool for estimating the severity of daily nasal symptoms and QOL, although it cannot predict nasal symptoms and QOL very accurately.     

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 level in sera is elevated in perennial allergic rhinitis

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) in sera was measured in some allergic disorders, but serum sICAM-1 levels in perennial allergic rhinitis remain to be determined. Our study was aimed at elucidating whether the serum sICAM-1 levels in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis are different from those in nonatopic healthy volunteers and whether immunotherapy can modulate sICAM-1 levels. Serum sICAM-1 was determined in 20 nonallergic volunteers and 137 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Our study demonstrated that the level of sICAM-1 in untreated patients is significantly elevated, as compared with nonatopic subjects. Immunotherapy could decrease sICAM-1 in perennial allergic rhinitis, but this suppressive effect became apparent only after many years of immunotherapy. In patients on immunotherapy, a close correlation was observed between sICAM-1 and nasal symptom scores. To take these lines of evidence together, a decrease in sICAM-1 might be related to the working mechanism of immunotherapy, and serum sICAM-1 could be used to monitor the effect of immunotherapy.     

Cervical actinomycosis. A rare differential diagnosis of parotid tumor]

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is usually treated with oral antihistamines or nasal steroids. Topically active nasal antihistamine is a new treatment modality for allergic rhinitis. The efficacy in comparison to well established topical treatment alternatives is not fully known. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intranasally administered azelastine to budesonide, at their respectively recommended dosage, on the symptoms of perennial rhinitis patients. METHODS: A placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension (256 microg once daily) with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray (280 microg twice daily (560 microg/day)) and with placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The 195 patients (with at least a 2-year history of perennial allergic rhinitis) recorded individual nasal symptom scores, the degree of symptom control achieved and any adverse events experienced over a 2-week baseline period and a 6-week treatment period. RESULTS: Following treatment, the reductions in mean combined and individual nasal symptom scores from baseline values were significantly greater in the budesonide group compared with the placebo group (P < .0001 for all variables except runny nose P = .01). In patients treated with budesonide, there were also significantly larger reductions from baseline values in combined nasal symptom scores (P < .01) and in scores for all individual nasal symptoms (P < or = .05) compared with those treated with azelastine. The reductions from baseline in both combined and individual nasal symptom scores did not differ between azelastine and placebo. The study medications were well tolerated, producing no unexpected or serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: A once-daily dose of 256 microg of intranasal budesonide aqueous suspension is significantly more effective at relieving the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis compared with a twice daily dose of 280 microg of azelastine nasal spray.     

Suppression of human melanoma metastasis following introduction of chromosome 6 is independent of NME1 (Nm23)

BACKGROUND: Nasal immunotherapy with single allergen extracts, following premedication with cromolyn, has been reported to be effective in treating seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and mechanism of action of nasal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis caused by weed pollens from three unrelated families. Twenty-seven weed-allergic patients underwent baseline nasal provocation and titrated skin test with a mixed weed extract containing ragweed, sage, and Chenopod extracts. Patients were randomized to receive either mixed weed extract or placebo. Nasal immunotherapy was self-administered daily to alternate nostrils preceded by 5.2 mg intranasal cromolyn. Beginning with 1:2500 wt/vol the concentration was increased to 1:10 wt/vol over an average period of 36 days. The maintenance dose (1:10 wt/vol) was administered daily for 12 to 16 weeks through the weed pollen season. Patients recorded nasal and eye symptoms and the use of rescue medications throughout the study. A nasal lavage for cytokine levels and nasal scraping with Rhinoprobe for nasal cytology were performed at the peak of the weed season. Nasal provocation and titrated skin tests with mixed weed extract were repeated after the weed season. Nasal lavage and scraping were also performed before and 24 hours after the final nasal provocation. RESULTS: During the peak weeks of the weed season the group receiving mixed weed extract by nasal instillation, compared with those treated with placebo, had significantly lower total nasal symptom scores, total eye symptom scores, and symptom medication scores. There were no significant differences in the nasal cytology or cytokines levels between the two groups, except for elevated IL-10 in the nasal lavage in the treated group at the peak of the season. Nasal symptoms and medication use were higher preseasonally in the active treatment group. CONCLUSION: Nasal immunotherapy with aqueous mixed weed extract administered with cromolyn sodium pretreatment for 17 to 21 weeks was effective in reducing both nasal and ocular symptoms of weed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. There were increased nasal symptoms in the treated group preseasonally.     

Evidence-based medicine: what is the evidence?

The cytology of nasal secretions in 20 patients with allergic rhinitis and 15 patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis was investigated with transmission electron microscope to study the ultrastructure of the cluster epithelial cells in nasal secretions of allergic rhinitis. The results showed that the cluster epithelial cells were predominant cellular element in allergic nasal secretions. The number of cluster cells correlated positively with the number of eosinophils and the levels of eosinophilic cationic protein. It is suggested that the exfoliation of cluster nasal epithelial cellular elements may be caused by eosinophic cationic protein with resultant hyperreactivity of nasal mucosa.     

Mometasone furoate. A review of its intranasal use in allergic rhinitis

Mometasone furoate is a synthetic corticosteroid which has been evaluated for intranasal use in the treatment of adults and children with allergic rhinitis. In several large, well-controlled clinical trials, mometasone furoate 200 micrograms administered once daily as an aqueous intranasal spray was significantly more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms associated with moderate to severe seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily fluticasone propionate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis, and was as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate and slightly more effective than once-daily oral loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was also as effective as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate or once-daily budesonide, and significantly more effective than placebo in the prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The onset of action of mometasone furoate was approximately 7 hours in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate was as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and budesonide in clinical trials, with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and of limited duration. The most common adverse events associated with mometasone furoate therapy were nasal irritation and/or burning, headache, epistaxis and pharyngitis. Intranasal or oral mometasone furoate had no detectable effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in studies of < or = 1 year in duration. CONCLUSIONS: Mometasone furoate is a well tolerated intranasal corticosteroid with minimal systemic activity and an onset of action of < or = 7 hours. It is effective in the prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients with moderate to severe symptoms.     

Myrtol standardized in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory infections in children. A multicenter post-marketing surveillance study

A total of 106 children suffering from perennial rhinitis and/or asthma, and all allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), underwent nasal provocation challenge (NPC) with DP to determine the best method of diagnosis. Posterior rhinomanometry was uninterpretable in 17 patients and gave negative results in 31. Clinical scores for sneezing and rhinorrhea were more effective but did not diagnose the disorder in 11 children. However, nine of the 11 had significant increases in eosinophil count in the late phase. Clinical scores and cytology were also useful for assessing whether NPC with allergens was positive in children. The feasibility and safety of NPC with DP are high for rhinitic and stable asthmatic patients, but mild reactions may occur during the late phase.     

Diagnostic use of enzymatic RAST skin tests and determination of eosinophils in nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis

AIMS: Allergic rhinitis is the most frequent disease mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE). Nasal challenge is the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Skin tests (ST) are the most used diagnostic method to detect the presence of specific IgE bind to skin mast cells. The exposition of the nasal mucous membrane to the allergen is followed by an increase of the local eosinophils; the count of eosinophils in nasal mucous (ENM) is a diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis. Enzymatic RAST or enzymatic allergo-sorbent test (ESA) measures the level of serum allergen-specific IgE. OBJECTIVE: To measure the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic precision of ST, EAST and ENM in allergic rhinitis. METHOD: We studied 241 individuals, 162 of them had allergic rhinitis, and 79 were healthy controls. They underwent nasal challenge and intradermic ST for Dermatophagoies spp (acarus). Fraxinus americana (Ash-tree), Amaranthus palmieri (quelite), Cynodon Dactylon (capriola) and Felis catus (cat), EAST for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (acarus), and ENIVI. Results of ST, EAST and ENIVI were compared with their corresponding nasal challenge, and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis for each allergen was calculated. The best cut point was assessed by means of receiver-operator curves (ROC), and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, inter-observer concordance coefficient, area under ROC (0), standard error of 0 (SEO), and 95% confidence interval of 0 of each test were calculated using the best cut point. RESULTS: ST and EAST had the best sensitivity and specificity. ENM had the lowest sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: For the diagnosis of Dermatophagoides spp allergic rhinitis ST for Dermatophagoides spp and EAST for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus have the same diagnostic precision. According to the indexes for diagnostic precision, and inter-observer concordance coefficient, ST and EAST are useful to diagnose allergic rhinitis induced by the evaluated allergens. ENIVI is a test that is not very useful for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.     

Effect of Pd and In on mercury evaporation from amalgams

The aim of work was evaluation of voice pathology in patients with allergic rhinitis. Larynx organic pathology were found in 75% patients with coexisting allergic rhinitis in the form of Reinke's oedema, chronic hypertrophic laryngitis, larynx polyp and vocal nodules. It caused serious voice pathology (dysphonia) which was confirmed by an objective spectrographic method. Larynx organic pathology was not in 15% patients. In these cases rhinophonia was found in consequence of resonance nasal defect.     

Levocabastine versus cetirizine for perennial allergic rhinitis in children

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of levocabastine nasal spray asid cetirizine oral for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized, prospective experimental, open clinical trial. We studied 30 children with ages between 6 and 16 years with perennial allergic rhinitis. Group 1, 17 subjects (7 female, 10 male) received cetirizine once daily, 5 mg children weientig less dian 30 k asid 10 mg in children weighing more trw' 30 k during 15 days. Group 2, 13 subjects (7 male, 6 female) received levocabastine 2 puffs BID on each nostril during tbe same time. A nasal symptoms score, nasal peal: flow vid eosinophils in a nasal smear were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in age, weight, height and arid duration of symptoms. Both groups showed improvement of symptoms via nasal peak flow with no differences between them (intergroup); nasal eosinophils remained unchanged. We for third statistical differences pre vid postreatment in each group (intragroup): Group 1, nasal congestion p = 0.002, ocular itch p = 0.01, sneezing p = 0.007, nasal secretion p = 0.01, nasal itch O = 0.009, total points O = 0.0005. Group 2, nasal congestion O = 0.02, ocular itch p = 0.05, sneezing p = 0.01, nasal secretion p = 0.01, nasal itch p = 0.04, total points p = 0.005. Significant differences were found in nasal peal' flow in Group 1 (p = 0.01) but no differences in eosinophils between file two groups. Side effects: 3 subjects in Group 1 (drowsiness, 1 appetite increase said 1 rhinorrea with epistaxis) vide 1 in Group 2 sensation of facial edema. CONCLUSION: Bofil drugs are effective the clinical relief of symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in children vied levocabastine has less side effects.     

Comparison between nasal and bronchial inflammation in asthmatic and control subjects

Although asthma and rhinitis often coexist, it is still unknown whether they are characterized by a similar inflammatory profile. We studied eosinophilic infiltration, epithelial shedding and reticular basement membrane thickness in nasal and bronchial biopsies of six control subjects, 15 untreated allergic asthmatics with perennial rhinitis, and six corticosteroid-dependent (CSD) asthmatics. In nasal and bronchial biopsies, eosinophils were greater in untreated asthmatics than in control subjects and CSD asthmatics (p = 0.001). In untreated asthmatics, eosinophils were higher in bronchial than in nasal biopsies (p = 0.002). In nasal and bronchial biopsies, reticular basement membrane thickness was greater in untreated and CSD asthmatics than in control subjects (nasal: p < 0.008 and p < 0. 004; bronchial: p < 0.001 and p < 0.008). In untreated and CSD asthmatics, reticular basement membrane thickness was greater in bronchial than in nasal biopsies (p = 0.001; Wilcoxon's W test). Nasal epithelium was not shed in all the study groups. In untreated asthmatics, bronchial epithelium shedding was greater than in control subjects or CSD asthmatics (p < 0.005), and it was greater than nasal epithelium shedding (p < 0.006). This study has shown that, although concomitant, the extent of eosinophilic inflammation of reticular basement membrane thickness and of the epithelium shedding is greater in bronchial than in nasal mucosa of asthmatic patients with perennial rhinitis.     

Verrucous squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations

Certain prostaglandins acting as inflammatory mediators have been implicated in the aetiology of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis in the nasal mucosa might therefore influence the symptoms associated with PAR. A randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial using 0.1% Diclofenac eye-drops has been conducted to investigate this hypothesis. Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), reduces prostaglandin synthesis through the inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway. Twenty-five patients with significant PAR and positive skin tests to relevant perennial allergens were recruited and two drops of the given preparation were administered bilaterally q.d.s.. Thirteen patients completed the study. Nasal symptom score (itch, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, and blockage), smell test score, saccharin transit time, total nasal airflow resistance, and nasal inspiratory peak flow measurements were obtained at each of three study visits. No significant treatment effects were found. The daily nasal symptom score over the entire study period showed no significant variation. Adverse effects such as local invitation, dry nose or throat were rare. No untoward changes in haematological, biochemical profiles and urinalysis occurred. In conclusion, topical 0.1% Diclofenac eye-drops applied nasally have no significant effect on PAR. Prostaglandins alone may not play a major role in mediation of symptoms in this condition.     

Eosinophil markers in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Intranasal fluticasone propionate inhibits local and systemic increases during the pollen season

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to study activation markers of the eosinophil granulocytes in seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the impact of topical steroid therapy thereupon. METHODS: Sixty-three rhinitis patients with monoallergy to grass were examined before and at peak pollen season. Blood eosinophil count, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) in serum and nasal lavage fluid were measured. During the season, patients were randomized to treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate 0.1 mg o.d. (n=26), 0.2 mg o.d. (n=25), or placebo (n=12). Six healthy persons served as controls. RESULTS: During the season, all parameters, except nasal lavage ECP, increased in the placebo group (P<0.001-P<0.05). Significant differences were seen between the steroid groups and the placebo group for all parameters (P<0.001-P<0.05). Higher eosinophil count (P<0.05), serum EPO (P<0.02), and nasal lavage EPO (P<0.05) were found in patients before season than in controls. The following winter, 44 patients returned for repeated measurement. Lower levels of nasal lavage EPO were observed for patients than levels at the beginning of the season (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate reduced inflammation of the nasal mucosa, demonstrated locally by nasal lavage ECP and EPO, and systemically by blood eosinophils, serum ECP, and serum EPO. EPO seemed more sensitive than ECP as indicator of allergic inflammation. EPO demonstrated some perennial eosinophil activity in hay fever patients, increasing locally during spring.     

Nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis caused by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus

We have evaluated the efficacy of Nedocromil sodium 1% nasal solution in 36 patients (20 females and 16 males, mean age 29.5 years) suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis caused by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Nedocromil sodium was given four times a day for 2 months. On a daily card patients had to report the severity of the considered symptoms (runny, nose, sneezing, itchy nose and stuffy nose) following an arbitrary score from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptom, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Clinical evaluation was performed after 1 month and at the end of the treatment. We observed a statistically significant decrease of the considered symptoms already after a one month therapy. This improvement was higher after two months (p < 0.001). No side effects have been reported and no concomitant symptomatic therapy was needed. Nedocromil sodium is therefore a safe and efficacious drug in the treatment of allergic rhinitis caused by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.     

Effect of topical steroids on nasal nitric oxide production in children with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study

It has been hypothesized that concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) may be related to the extent of cytokine-mediated airway inflammation. Recent findings indicate the nasal airways as an important site of NO production. Our objective was to evaluate whether children with allergic rhinitis show different nasal NO levels when compared with normal healthy subjects and the effect of topical steroids and anti-histamine therapy. We have measured the concentration of NO drawn from the nose of 21 children (5-17 years old) affected by perennial allergic rhinitis (house dust mite) out of therapy for at least 3 weeks. Thirteen children were then treated with nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (400 micrograms daily) and eight subjects with nasal anti-histamine levocabastine (200 micrograms daily). Measurements were performed before and after 10 days of treatment. As a control group we evaluated 21 healthy children aged 5-15 years. To measure NO we used a chemiluminescence analyser. Before treatment the whole group of children with allergic rhinitis showed a mean (+/- SEM) nasal NO concentration of 267 +/- 18 ppb, significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the control group (186 +/- 15 ppb). The group of children treated with BDP showed, after 10 days of therapy, a significant (P < 0.05) decrease of nasal NO concentration (271 +/- 21 ppb vs. 212 +/- 20 ppb). Indeed, in the group treated with levocabastine, nasal NO concentrations did not present a significant difference (P not significant) compared with baseline (261 +/- 33 ppb and 252 +/- 31 ppb, respectively). These data suggest that (1) children with allergic rhinitis have higher levels of nasal NO than non-atopic controls and (2) intranasal steroid therapy significantly reduces nasal NO production in children with allergic rhinitis. We speculate that the allergic inflammatory response may influence the nasal NO levels and that NO measurements may be a useful marker of nasal inflammation.     

Allergic rhinitis in the region of Mérida

We studied the whole of 3,047 patients who consult our unit because of a presumable allergic affection. The 20% to suffer from allergic rhinitis. The most frequent clinical presentation has been rhinitis allergic seasonal followed by perennial and to extend seasonal. We have diagnosed through by prick-test, specific IgE and ocular provocation test. The ethiology more common has been the grass pollen together olive followed pollen grass from seasonal rhinitis. The mites dust from perennial rhinitis and the grass and polisensitizations to seasonal extend.     

Relative value of peripheral blood, secretion and tissue eosinophilia in the diagnosis of different patterns of allergic rhinitis

Eosinophil count in peripheral blood, nasal secretion and nasal mucosa were studied in 20 controls and 38 patients with different patterns of allergic rhinits. Secretion and tissue eosinophilia were pathologically high in a greater number of patients than peripheral blood eosinophilia. This trend was seen in all patterns of allergic rhinitis but was more evident in seasonal allergic rhinitis. The conclusion was reached that examination of local site and local secretions for eosinophilia is helpful in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.     

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is safe and effective for children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

INTRODUCTION: Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new topical corticosteroid preparation, is effective when given as 200 micrograms once daily in patients (> 12 years of age) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone proprionate aqueous nasal spray in children aged 4 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty children aged 4 to 11 years with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms, a positive skin test reaction to a late-summer or autumn allergen, a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and documentation of an unsatisfactory response to conventional treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate, either 100 micrograms or 200 micrograms, or placebo, given by intranasal spray once daily in the morning for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Severity of nasal symptoms (obstruction, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing) was recorded on visual analog scales by investigators at weekly visits and by patients (or adult guardian) daily in the evening. According to investigator and patient ratings, both fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms/d and 200 micrograms/d lowered total nasal symptom scores when compared with placebo. Both dosages of fluticasone propionate were more effective than placebo on the basis of investigator-rated overall clinical evaluation of efficacy at the end of treatment, with significant improvement (as opposed to moderate or mild improvement, no change or worsening) noted in 21% to 29% of the active-treatment groups vs 9% in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the two fluticasone propionate dosages in any efficacy measurement. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar in the fluticasone propionate and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In children as young as 4 years, 100 micrograms of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray given once daily is as effective as 200 micrograms given once daily, the usual adult dose for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both fluticasone propionate dosages were well tolerated and neither dosage appears to interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children.