Isotactic polypropylene/polystyrene blends: Effects of the addition of a graft copolymer of propylene with styrene

A novel graft copolymer of unsaturated propylene with styrene (uPP-g-PS) was added to binary blends of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and atactic polystyrene (aPS) with a view to using such a copolymer as compatibilizer for iPP/aPS materials. Differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), wide angle X-ray scattering, and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques have been carried out to investigate the phase morphology and structure developed in solution-cast samples of iPP/aPS/uPP-g-PS ternary blends. It was found that the uPP-g-PS addition can provide iPP/aPS-compatibilized materials and that the extent of the achieved compatibilization is composition-dependent. Blends of iPP and aPS exhibited a coarse domain morphology that is characteristic of immiscible polymer systems. By adding 2% (wt/wt) of uPP-g-PS copolymer a very broad particle-size distribution was obtained, even though the particles appeared coated by a smooth interfacial layer, as expected according to a core–shell interfacial model. With increasing uPP-g-PS content (5% wt/wt), a finer dispersion degree of particles, together with morphological evidence of interfacial adhesion, was found. With further increase of uPP-g-PS amount (10% wt/wt) the material showed such a homogeneous texture that neither domains of dispersed phase nor holes could be clearly detected by SEM. The type of interface developed in such iPP/aPS/uPP-g-PS blends was accounted for by an interfacial interpenetration model. The iPP crystalline texture, size, neatness, and regularity of iPP spherulites crystallized from iPP/aPS/uPP-g-PS blends were found to decrease when the copolymer content was slightly increased. Assuming, for the iPP spherulite fibrillae, a two-phase model constituted by alternating parallel crystalline lamellae and amorphous layers, it was shown by SAXS that the phase structure generated in iPP/aPS/uPP-g-PS blends is characterized by crystalline lamellar thickness (L_c) and interlamellar amorphous layer thickness (L_a) higher than that shown by plain iPP; the higher the copolymer content, the higher the L_c and L_a. It should be remarked that considerably larger increases have been found in L_a values. Such SAXS results have been accounted for by assuming that a cocrystallization phenomenon between propylenic sequences of the uPP-g-PS copolymer and iPP occurs and that during such a process PS chains grafted into copolymer sequences remain entrapped in iPP interlamellar amorphous layers, where they form their own separate domains. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65:1539–1553, 1997     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology development of isotactic polypropylene blends with atactic polypropylene

The crystallization kinetics and morphology development of pure isotactic polypropylene (iPP) homopolymer and iPP blended with atactic polypropylene (aPP) at different aPP contents and the isothermal crystallization temperatures were studied with differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, and polarized optical microscopy. The spherulitic morphologies of pure iPP and larger amounts of aPP for iPP blends showed the negative spherulite, whereas that of smaller amounts of aPP for the iPP blends showed a combination of positive and negative spherulites. This indicated that the morphology transition of the spherulite may have been due to changes the crystal forms of iPP in the iPP blends during crystallization. Therefore, with smaller amounts of aPP, the spherulitic density and overall crystallinity of the iPP blends increased with increasing aPP and presented a lower degree of perfection of the γ form coexisting with the α form of iPP during crystallization. However, with larger amounts of aPP, the spherulitic density and overall crystallinity of the iPP blends decreased and reduced the γ‐form crystals with increasing aPP. These results indicate that the aPP molecules hindered the nucleation rate and promoted the molecular motion and growth rate of iPP with smaller amounts of aPP and hindered both the nucleation rate and growth rate of iPP with larger amounts of aPP during isothermal crystallization. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1093–1104, 2007     

Morphology,crystallization, and thermal behavior of isotactic polypropylene/polystyrene blends: Effects of the addition of a graft copolymer of propylene with styrene

Optical microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering techniques were used to study the influence of crystallization conditions on the morphology and thermal behavior of samples of ternary blends constituted by isotactic polypropylene (iPP), atactic polystyrene (aPS), and a novel graft copolymer of unsaturated propylene with styrene (uPP‐g‐PS) with the purpose of assessing the uPP‐g‐PS capability to act as a compatibilizer for iPP/aPS materials. It was shown that the presence of the uPP‐g‐PS copolymer affects the interfacial tension between the iPP and aPS phases in the melt state, with the aPS particle size and the particle‐size distribution being, in fact, strongly modified. In samples of iPP/aPS/uPP‐g‐PS blends, isothermally crystallized from the melt at a relatively low undercooling in a range of the crystallization temperature of the iPP phase, the addition of the uPP‐g‐PS copolymer induced a drastic change both in the aPS mode and the state of dispersion and in the iPP spherulitic texture and inner structure of the spherulite fibrils. In particular, the phase structure developed in the iPP/aPS/uPP‐g‐PS materials was characterized by a crystalline lamellar thickness of the iPP phase comparable to that shown by the plain iPP. The extent of the induced modifications, that is, the degree of compatibilization achieved, resulted in a combined effect of composition and undercooling. Also, relevant thermodynamic parameters of the iPP phase, such as the equilibrium melting temperature (T_m) and the folding surface free energy (ς_e) of the lamellar crystals, were found to be influenced by the presence of the uPP‐g‐PS copolymer. A linear decrease of the T_m and ς_e values with increasing uPP‐g‐PS content was, in fact, observed. Such results have been accounted for by an increase of the presence of defects along the iPP crystallizable sequences and by the very irregular and perturbed surface of the crystals with increasing copolymer content. The observed decrease in T_m values revealed, moreover, that, in the iPP/aPS/uPP‐g‐PS blends, the iPP crystal growth occurs under comparatively lower undercooling, in line with higher crystalline lamellar thickness shown by SAXS investigation. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 1429–1442, 1999     

The supermolecular structure of isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene blends

The supermolecular structure of binary isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene (iPP/PS) injection‐molded blends were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and optical microscopy. The combination of different methods gives a possibility of analysis of relation between the phase transformation in polypropylene and crystallization parameters. Effect of compatibilization of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) block copolymers in the iPP/PS blends on the structure, nucleation, crystal growth, solidification, and the phase morphology was analyzed. We found that the β‐crystallization tendency of polypropylene matrix can be enhanced by adding atactic polystyrene. However, the incorporation of SEBS‐g‐MA into iPP/PS blends resulted in an important decrease in β‐content of iPP. It is evident that the presence of compatibilizing agent caused a very significant reduction of the α‐spherulite growth rates and the crystal conversion as well as increases of half‐time crystallization in comparison with the iPP/PS systems. The relation between kinetic parameters of crystallization process and polymorphic structure of iPP in blend systems has been satisfactorily explained. Moreover, a strong effect of processing parameters on the β‐phase formation was observed. The results clearly show that at a higher temperature of mold and lower injection speed, the amount of β‐phase of iPP matrix slightly decreases. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Spherulite nucleation in blends of isotactic polypropylene with isotactic poly(butene-1)

The phase morphology and the influence of composition on the primary nucleation of isotactic polypropylene in isotactic polypropylene/isotactic poly(butene-1) (iPP/iPB) blends were investigated by electron and light microscopy and small-angle light scattering. It was found that iPP and iPB are miscible but the thermal treatment induces partial phase separation of components and the formation of iPP-rich and iPB-rich phases. The complete phase separation needs high temperatures and/or a long time of melt annealing. In samples crystallized isothermally at low undercooling the heterogeneous primary nucleation in blends is depressed as compared to plain iPP. In blends the less active heterogeneities lose their activity because of an increase of the energy barrier for critical size nucleus formation due to phase separation of blend components during crystallization. For the same reason the rate of homogeneous nucleation in blends decreases, as observed in samples crystallized at very high undercooling. At very high undercooling iPP and iPB are able to crystallize with similar rates, which results in the formation of a fraction of iPB spherulites in addition to iPP spherulites. Consequently the number of spherulites in the blend is larger than that in plain iPP, in spite of the decrease in the homogeneous nucleation rate of iPP in the blend. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Morphology,crystallization, and thermal behavior of isotactic polypropylene/propylene‐g‐styrene blends

Optical microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and small angle X‐ray scattering techniques were used to study the influence of the crystallization conditions on morphology and thermal behavior of samples of binary blends constituted of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and a novel graft copolymer of unsaturated propylene with styrene (uPP‐g‐PS) isothermally crystallized from melt, at relatively low undercooling, in a range of crystallization temperatures of the iPP phase. It was shown that, irrespective of composition, no fall in the crystallinity index of the iPP phase was observed. Notwithstanding, spherulitic texture and thermal behavior of the iPP phase in the iPP/uPP‐g‐PS materials were strongly modified by the presence of copolymer. Surprisingly, iPP spherulites crystallized from the blends showed size and regularity higher than that exhibited by plain iPP spherulites. Moreover, the amount of amorphous material located in the interspherulitic amorphous regions decreased with increasing crystallization temperature, and for a given crystallization temperature, with increasing uPP‐g‐PS content. Also, relevant thermodynamic parameters, related to the crystallization process of the iPP phase from iPP/uPP‐g‐PS melts, were found, composition dependent. The equilibrium melting temperature and the surface free energy of folding of the iPP lamellar crystals grown in the presence of uPP‐g‐PS content up to 5% (wt/wt) were, in fact, respectively slightly lower and higher than that found for the lamellar crystals of plain iPP. By further increase of the copolymer content, both the equilibrium melting temperature and surface free energy of folding values were, on the contrary, depressed dramatically. The obtained results were accounted for by assuming that the iPP crystallization process from iPP/uPP‐g‐PS melts could occur through molecular fractionation inducing a combination of morphological and thermodynamic effects. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2286–2298, 2001     

Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer and isotactic polypropylene: morphology and thermomechanical properties

A set of blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) and isotactic polypropylene (i‐PP) in a composition range 0–100 % polypropylene by weight was prepared in a twin screw extruder. The morphology of the blends has been studied by transmission electron microscopy. The blends present phase separation. Dynamic mechanical measurements show an improvement of the mechanical properties of SBS when i‐PP is the dispersed phase. This reinforcing effect can be observed even at high temperatures when i‐PP is in the rubbery state. The mechanical properties of the blends have been interpreted using Takayanagi's block model. The melting and crystallization behaviour of the i‐PP in the blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry. The fractionated crystallization phenomenon has been observed in the blends where i‐PP forms the dispersed phase. The results are consistent with the morphology shown by the blends, in particular, with its phase inversion, which occurs at a composition near to 50% i‐PP. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology, phase structure and thermal behaviour of films of isotactic polypropylene/hydrogenated oligocyclopentadiene blends: 1. Extruded isotropic films

The effect of hydrogenated oligocyclopentadiene (HOCP) on the structure and morphology of isotropic isotactic polypropylene (iPP) films obtained by melt extrusion has been studied using wide-angle X-ray scattering, thermal analysis and electron microscopy. It was found that the addition of HOCP causes the formation of the smectic phase of iPP at temperatures where bulk iPP crystallizes only in the monoclinic form. The amount of smectic phase present in the blend is dependent on the blend composition. The spherulitic morphology of iPP is completely modified by the presence of HOCP. For blends containing up to 10% HOCP, the iPP spherulite dimensions are drastically reduced. In the case of blends of higher HOCP content, the film crystallinity is reduced, no spherulites are visible and the film surface appears smoother.     

Morphology of a melt crystallized iPP/HDPE/hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin blend

The structure, phase structure, morphology, crystallization and melting behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blended with a master batch (MB), formed by high density polyethylene and hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin (iPP/MB), have been in details investigated by using X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. It was found that the structure and morphology depend on crystallization conditions. A new family of α spherulites of iPP (type I spherulites) can be activated using appropriate crystallization conditions. Nucleation of these spherulites has been explained by using the approach of nucleus migration in polymer blends. Type I spherulites present specific morphological, kinetic and thermal behaviors. In particular it was found that the growth rate of type I spherulites, at a given T_c, is higher than the growth rate of spherulites grown from plain iPP.     

Nanocomposites of syndiotactic polypropylene: Phase behavior and morphology

Through differential scanning calorimetry, the crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) nanocomposites with organically modified layered silicates has been investigated in both nonisothermal and isothermal conditions. A strong influence on the thermal behavior is exerted by the compatibilizer agent (low molecular weight isotactic polypropylene‐g‐maleic anydrhyde, iPP‐g‐MA), which increases the crystallization rate of sPP. A further strong increase in the crystallization rate is observed upon increasing the OLS content in the sample. The kinetics data have been analyzed through the Ozawa, Avrami, and Tobin methods, the first of them resulted ineffective in describing our data. Morphological analyses have been performed by polarized optical microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Spherulitic morphology is observed for neat sPP; for the sample containing only the compatibilizer the spherulites grow around the iPP‐g‐MA particles, revealing their nucleating effect on sPP crystallization; for the nanocomposites the spherulitic morphology is lost: the texture appears globular, compact; inside the globules lamellae are present, parallel one to the other. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:1433–1442, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Microstructural characteristics of glass bead‐ and wollastonite‐filled isotactic‐polypropylene composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers

Microstructural characteristics of isotactic‐polypropylene/glass bead (iPP/GB) and iPP/wollastonite (iPP/W) composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers, poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) copolymer (SEBS) and corresponding block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA), were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA) showed that the iPP/SEBS and iPP/SEBS‐g‐MA blends were partially compatible two‐phase systems. Well‐dispersed spherical GB and acicular W particles without evidence of interfacial adhesion were observed in the iPP/GB and iPP/W binary composites respectively. Contrary to the blends, melt flow rates of the iPP/GB and PP/W composites decreased more with SEBS‐g‐MA than with SEBS because of enhanced interfacial adhesion with SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer. The SEM analyses showed that the ternary composites containing SEBS exhibited separate dispersion of the rigid filler and elastomer particles (i.e., separate microstructure). However, SEBS‐g‐MA elastomer not only encapsulated the spherical GB and acicular W particles completely with strong interfacial adhesion (i.e., core‐shell microstructure) but also dispersed separately throughout iPP matrix. In accordance with the SEM observations, the DSC and DMA revealed quantitatively that the rigid filler and SEBS particles in iPP matrix acted individually, whereas the rigid filler particles in the ternary composites containing SEBS‐g‐MA acted like elastomer particles because of the thick elastomer interlayer around the filler particles. The Fourier transform infrared analyses revealed an esterification reaction inducing the strong interfacial adhesion between the SEBS‐g‐MA phase and the filler particles. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1265–1284, 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Thermoplastic elastomers from iPP/EPR blends: Crystallization and phase structure development

The phase morphology and structure of thermoplastic elastomers obtained from isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and ethylene—propylene random copolymer (EPR) blends by means of the dynamic curing of EPR rubbery component carried out during its melt mixing with iPP in a Banbury mixer at 180°C were investigated. Samples obtained by compression molding and by using isothermal crystallization conditions of the iPP phase were analyzed by means of differential scanning calorimetry, of optical, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy, and of wide-angle and small-angle X-ray diffraction. The influence of cooling below the melting point and of EPR molecular structure on the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters related to crystallization process of the iPP phase was also studied. It was found that the process of dynamic curing of the EPR component dramatically affects the development of the phase morphology and structure in the material. As a matter of fact, the blend containing the uncured EPR is characterized by the presence of iPP domains randomly distributed in the EPR rubbery matrix, whereas in the blend containing the cured EPR the iPP phase becomes the continuous phase crystallizing in a structure that resembles a cobweb tending to surround the EPR cured particles; moreover such an iPP cobweb appears to be contituted by row structures of stacked lamellae. It was found that the addition of EPR phase interferes dramatically with the crystallization process of the iPP, thus inducing drastic modification in its intrinsic morphology (size, neatness, regularity of spherulites, inner structure of spherulites, etc.). Such interference was found to be comparatively stronger when the iPP phase crystallizes in presence of cured EPR. The elastic behavior of the thermoplastic elastomer material was accounted for by applying the “leaf spring model” to the morphology and structure of the iPP phase crystallized in presence of cured EPR. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Crystallization behaviour of isotactic polypropylene/linear low density polyethylene blends

Crystallization behaviour of isotactic polypropylene/linear low density polyethylene (iPP/LLDPE) blends has been investigated by optical microscopy and DSC. Crystallization of iPP depends upon blend composition and thermal history. When blended with LLDPE, the crystallization temperature of iPP, T_c, decreased slightly. Crystallinity did not change in the range 0-80wt% LLDPE; there were only slight changes in the crystalline structure, but LLDPE seemed to resist forming the β type of spherulites. Below 80 wt% of LLDPE, iPP was a continuous phase. The iPP spherulite growth rate was almost constant; however, overall crystallization decreased due to decreasing primary nuclei density.     

Influence of phase modifiers on morphology and properties of thermoplastic elastomers prepared from ethylene propylene diene rubber and isotactic polypropylene

A series of thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) were prepared from a binary blend of ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) using different types of phase modifiers. The influence of sulphonated EPDM, maleated EPDM, styrene‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer, maleated PP, and acrylated PP as phase modifiers showed improved physico‐mechanical properties (like maximum stress, elongation at break, moduli, and tension set). Scanning electron and atomic force microscopy studies revealed better morphologies obtained with these phase modified EPDM‐iPP blends. The dependence of the phase modifier type and concentration was optimized with respect to the improvement in physical properties and morphology of the blends. Physical properties, dynamic mechanical properties, and morphology of these blends were explained with the help of interaction parameter, melt viscosity, and crystallinity of the blends. Theoretical modeling showed that Kerner, Ishai‐Cohen, and Paul models predicted the right morphology–property correlation for the prepared TPEs. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Spherulite nucleation in polypropylene blends with low density polyethylene

Primary nucleation of spherulites in blends of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) with low density polyethylene (LDPE) was investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. The number of iPP spherulites in the blend decreases with increasing LDPE concentration to a much greater extent than follows from the decreasing amount of iPP. The shapes of spherulite size distributions indicate that athermal (heterogeneous) primary nucleation is inhibited. The density of primary nucleation in the blends decreases strongly with increasing mixing time. The same effect was observed in the blends with the nucleating agent which was added to iPP or LDPE. These experiments demonstrate that heterogenoeus nuclei migrate across interphase boundaries from the iPP melt to the LDPE melt during the mixing process. It is suggested that the interfacial energy difference between the nuclei and the molten components of the blend is responsible for the migration of nuclei.     

Physical properties of polyamide 6/metallocene isotactic polypropylene conjugated filaments

Polyamide 6 (PA 6) and metallocene isotactic polypropylene (m‐iPP) polymers were extruded (in proportions of 75/25, 50/50, and 25/75) from two melt twin‐screw extruders to prepare three PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments. This study investigated the physical properties of PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments with gel permeation chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, potentiometry, rheometry, density‐gradient measurements, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, extension stress–strain measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. The flow behavior of PA 6/m‐iPP polyblended polymers exhibited negative‐deviation blends, and a 50/50 PA 6/m‐iPP blend showed the minimum value of the melt viscosity. The experimental results from differential scanning calorimetry indicated that PA 6 and m‐iPP molecules formed an immiscible system. The tenacity of the PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments decreased initially and then increased as the m‐iPP content increased. The crystallinities and densities of the PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments had a linear relationship with the blend ratio. Morphological observations revealed that the blends had a dispersed‐phase structure. A pore/fiber morphology of a larger size (from 0.5 to 3 μm in diameter) was observed after a formic acid (PA 6 was moved)/xylene (m‐iPP was moved) treatment on the cross section of a PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filament. PA 6 and m‐iPP polymers were proved to be an incompatible system. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 1471–1476, 2006     

Phase Morphology and Miscibility of iPP/PcBR Blends

Isotactic polypropylene/poly(cis-butadiene) rubber (iPP/PcBR) blends were prepared by melt mixing. Phase morphology of the blends was investigated by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). It was found that the dispersed phase spread in continuous phase in a form of spherical particles. The size of the dispersed phase increased as its content increased. The phase-inversion region was the composition of 50/50 and 40/60 vol% in the blends. In the phase-inversion region, a double continuous phase was formed. The glass transition temperatures (T _g ) of iPP, PcBR and blends were analyzed by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The blend compositions exhibited two distinct glass transition temperatures corresponding to the iPP-rich and PcBR-rich phases, respectively. The approach of these two peaks with increasing PcBR content indicated partial miscibility between the iPP and PcBR, which was verified by the equilibrium melting point depression of blends.     

Studies on the dynamically vulcanized polypropylene (PP)/butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) blends: Mechanical properties

Unvulcanized and dynamically vulcanized blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) in the composition range of 10–40 wt % SBS were prepared by melt mixing in an internal mixer and evaluated for impact and tensile properties. Dynamic vulcanization of blends gave superior mechanical properties. Systematic changes with varying blend composition were found in stress-strain behavior in both the blend systems. The effect of blend composition on the state of dispersion and morphology of the dispersed phase droplets were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Analysis of the yield stress data in terms of various theoretical models revealed the variation of stress concentration effect with blend composition and higher interphase adhesion in dynamically vulcanized blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65: 2691–2701, 1997     

Structure,processing, morphology,and property relationships of biaxially drawn Ziegler–Natta/metallocene isotactic polypropylene film

The structure, processing, morphology, and property relationships of biaxially drawn isotactic polypropylene (BOPP) film of mixed metallocene isotactic PP (m‐iPP) and Ziegler–Natta iPP (ZN‐iPP) homopolymer compositions are developed. The DSC and film drawing behavior show cocrystallization of the ZN‐iPP and m‐iPP components. The structure, processing, morphology, and property relations of ZN‐iPP/m‐iPP blends are compared with ZN‐iPP of varying isotacticities. The ZN‐iPP/m‐iPP blends exhibit reduced biaxial yield stress [σ_y(T)]. A fractional crystallinity model collapses the σ_y(T) data into a common normalized form over a range of draw temperatures, ZN‐iPP tacticities, and blend compositions. The simplified model is extended to define the interrelationships of yield activation and strain hardening behavior into regimes differentiated by characteristic draw stress (crystallinity) levels. Structure–property models are developed to explain the effect of draw temperature and resin–blend microstructure on the draw behavior, film stiffness, barrier, elongation, and synergies of the BOPP film processing–property balance. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2400–2415, 2001     

Miscibility in crystalline polymer blends: Isotactic polypropylene and linear low‐density polyethylene

The phase behavior and the crystallization kinetics of blends composed of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The phase behavior indicates the formation of separate crystals of iPP and LLDPE at each investigated blend composition. The crystallization trace reveals that iPP crystallizes in its normal range of temperatures (i.e., at temperatures higher than that of LLDPE), when its content in the blend is higher than 25% by weight. In the blend whose iPP content is as high as 25%, at least a portion of iPP crystallizes at temperatures lower than that of LLDPE. This behavior has been proposed by Bassett to be attributed to a change in the kind of nucleation from heterogeneous to homogeneous. From the Avrami analysis of the isothermal crystallization of iPP in the presence of molten LLDPE, n values close to 2 are always obtained. According to our previously proposed interpretation of the Avrami coefficient, it can be related to the crystallite fractal dimension, through d = n + 1, which gives values close to 3, according to the spherulitic observed morphology. The kinetics parameter, i.e., the half‐time of crystallization, and the kinetic constant k show that a decrease in the overall rate of crystallization of iPP occurs on blending. Optical microscopy photographs, taken during the cooling of the samples from the melt, confirm the above results and show increasingly less resolved spherulite texture on increasing LLDPE content in the blend. The diffusion parameters evaluated for the neat polymers and for the blends in dichloromethane, which give information on the miscibility in the amorphous state, show that the diffusional behavior of the blends is governed by iPP, suggesting a two‐phase amorphous state. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3338–3346, 2003