共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 112 毫秒
1.
农村户用沼气对环境影响的指标体系与评价 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
以客观性、系统性、定量性、比较性、效益性为原则,采用属性逐层分解法,建立农村户用沼气的环境评价指标体系,利用层次分析法对户用沼气对环境的影响进行评价,得出结论:农村户用沼气对各项环境指标的影响均为正或为零,各项指标影响程度由弱到强依次为大气环境(0)或水资源(0)、土地质量(0.034)、农村居民的健康状况(0.045)、动植物资源(0.2405)、农村居民的居住环境(0.6975)、农村居民的生活条件(1.1417);农村户用沼气对农村社会环境的影响程度(2.16)远大于对自然环境的影响程度(0.2755);农村户用沼气对环境影响的综合评价值为2.4355,达中度有利影响。 相似文献
2.
通过对尤溪县农村户用沼气建设现状进行调查,根据农村户用沼气发展存在的问题,提出农村户用沼气建设的发展对策,又好又快地推动农村沼气事业的发展。 相似文献
3.
针对福建省近年来农村户用沼气建设中所面临的问题进行分析与归纳,并对进一步建设和发展农村沼气提出相应的措施和对策。 相似文献
4.
渭河上游黄土丘陵地区农村户用沼气建设的环境经济效益分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
渭河上游的黄土丘陵地区经济贫困、环境脆弱、生活能源短缺,生物质的过量消费成为生态环境退化的重要因素。文章通过问卷调查获取相关数据,并建立计量模型,评估户用沼气建设工程对农户生活能源总体结构的影响,进而分析其生态经济效益。结果表明,沼气对农户生活能源结构的转换升级作用明显,生态经济效益显著,每口8 m3沼气池年产气量为300 m3,每年创造生态经济效益591.32元,其中生态环境效益231.88元,经济效益359.44元,减少农户现金支出153.39元。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
第三集 沼气池管理技术
本集重点介绍农村家用沼气池管理方面的技术。
35问:建好沼气池以后如何管理好是非常重要的事情,那么,沼气池的管理都包括些什么呢? 相似文献
8.
9.
随着国债农村户用沼气项目的进行,各地呈现出建设沼气的热潮。2004年,全国新增农村沼气户103万户,如此大规模的建设,配套产品的质量显得尤为重要。根据设计要求,混凝土沼气池使用寿命为20a,配套产品的设计寿命也应为20a,才能实现真正的配套,尤其是与混凝土紧密结合的导气管、地埋的输气管等不易更换的配件的质量,直接影响沼气池的使用寿命。如何保证沼气池的设计使用寿命,笔者认为,专业化配套是农村户用沼气发展的必然要求。 相似文献
10.
户用沼气在新农村建设中的模式、作用及思路 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
通过福建省农村能源示范县项目的实施,探索龙岩市农村户用沼气建设的基本模式及其在新农村建设中的作用,提出农村沼气发展的思路。 相似文献
11.
12.
户用沼气池综合效益评价方法 总被引:19,自引:1,他引:19
根据我国户用沼气池发展现状,提出了户用沼气池综合效益评价方法,首次提出并界定了采用沼气池初始投入、直接能源产出、直接经济效益和生态环境效益等指标进行效益的评价,避免了过去对效益评价的不可比性和因考虑到间接效益而引起的评价困难,使评价结果更具客观性和科学性。 相似文献
13.
《Energy Policy》2016
Existing policies of household biogas projects focus mainly on supports on construction, but less consider management and maintenance, resulting in high scrap rate and waste of resources. Alternative policies must be explored to balance construction and operation. Taking the costs and benefits from a typical rural household biogas project, this paper assesses the economic performance at three different subsidy levels, i.e., no subsidy, existing standard and positive externality based standard. Furthermore three subsidy alternatives, one-time, annual and combined option are applied to the externality based standard. The results show that household biogas digesters have unsatisfactory economic performance without any subsidy and even in current subsidy policies. Environmental benefits of the digester were estimated as 2732 Chinese Yuan, significantly larger than existing subsidy standard. To keep continuous work during the 20-year lifespans of digesters, the income disparity of farmers among regions must be considered for policy application. With the increasing of labor costs, the ratio of initial subsidies must be reduced. These results provide policy implications to the future development of biogas projects in terms of both their construction and follow-up management, reuse of the abandoned digesters as well as the exploitation of other emerging renewable energy projects. 相似文献
14.
15.
从社会经济效益的角度,利用BIA指标体系,对县、村、农户三个类别,沼气知识与技术、经济影响和家庭社会影响三个维度,全方位考察了农业能源生态沼气项目对沼气项目户的影响,为大范围内深入推进生态家园富民行动工作提供实证参考. 相似文献
16.
17.
This study was carried out in response to the growing interest on household biogas digesters in Latin America, particularly in rural Andean communities. The aim was to compare the fixed dome and plastic tubular digester in terms of biogas production, cost and environmental impact, using the life cycle assessment methodology. Design and operational parameters, construction materials and implementation costs were based on our previous research and literature results for plastic tubular and fixed dome digesters, respectively. According to this analysis, the main advantage of the plastic tubular digester was its ease of implementation and handling, and lower investment cost compared to the fixed dome digester, which appeared to be more environmentally friendly. 相似文献
18.
19.
《Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews》2007,11(8):1903-1912
Rural household biogas construction is a key program of renewable energy construction in China, which can partly help to reduce the problem of global warming.This article uses the international commonly used calculation of emission reduction to analyze the quantity of reduction in CO2 and SO2 emissions, which is resulting from the substitution of household biogas in place of traditional biomass energy and coal during the period from 1996 to 2003. The result shows that such substitution can reduce the discharge of CO2 by 397.6–4193.9 thousand tons and SO2 by 21.3–62.0 thousand tons annually. This article then predicts the amount of reduction in CO2 and SO2 emissions that would occur in 2010, 2020 and 2050 with the substitution of biogas energy instead of traditional energy sources in rural areas. All of these prove that rural biogas construction is an effective means of reducing the emission of greenhouse and other harmful gases into the atmosphere. 相似文献