首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The methanol barrier layer adopted for high-concentration direct methanol fuel cells (HC-DMFCs) increases water transport resistance, and makes water management in HC-DMFCs more challenging and critical than that in the conventional direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) without a methanol barrier layer. In the semi-passive HC-DMFC used in this work, oxygen was actively supplied to the cathode side while various concentrated methanol solutions, 4 M, 8 M, 16 M, and neat methanol, were passively supplied from the anode fuel reservoir. The effects of the cathode relative humidity, cathode pressure, and oxygen flow rate on the water crossover coefficient, fuel efficiency, and overall performance of the fuel cell were studied. Results showed that electrolyte membrane resistance, which was determined by its water content, was the predominant factor that determined the performance of a HC-DMFC, especially at a high current density. A negative water crossover coefficient, which indicated that water flowed back from the cathode through the electrolyte membrane to the anode, was measured when the methanol concentration was 8 M or higher. The back flow of water from the cathode is a very important water supply source to hydrate the electrolyte membrane. The water crossover coefficient was decreased by increasing the cathode relative humidity and back pressure. Water flooding at the cathode was not severe in the HC-DMFC, and a low oxygen flow rate was preferred to decrease water loss and yield a better performance. The peak power density generated from the HC-DMFC fed with 16 M methanol solution was 75.9 mW cm−2 at 70 °C.  相似文献   

2.
Commercial Nafion®-115 (trademark registered to DuPont) membranes were modified by in situ polymerized phenol formaldehyde resin (PFR) to suppress methanol crossover, and SO3 groups were introduced to PFR by post-sulfonatation. A series of membranes with different sulfonated phenol formaldehyde resin (sPFR) loadings have been fabricated and investigated. SEM-EDX characterization shows that the PFR was well dispersed throughout the Nafion® membrane. The composite membranes have a similar or slightly lower proton conductivity compared with a native Nafion® membrane, but show a significant reduction in methanol crossover (the methanol permeability of sPFR/Nafion® composite membrane with 2.3 wt.% sPFR loading was 1.5 × 10−6 cm2 s−1, compared with the 2.5 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 for the native Nafion® membrane). In direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) evaluation, the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) using a composite membrane with a 2.3 wt.% sPFR loading shows a higher performance than that of a native Nafion® membrane with 1 M methanol feed, and at higher methanol concentrations (5 M), the composite membrane achieved a 114 mW cm−2 maximum power density, while the maximum power density of the native Nafion® was only 78 mW cm−2.  相似文献   

3.
This paper was presented to determine the methanol crossover and efficiency of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) under various operating conditions such as cell temperature, methanol concentration, methanol flow rate, cathode flow rate, and cathode backpressure. The methanol crossover measurements were performed by measuring crossover current density at an open circuit using humidified nitrogen instead of air at the cathode and applied voltage with a power supply. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with an active area of 5 cm2 was composed of a Nafion 117 membrane, a Pt–Ru (4 mg/cm2) anode catalyst, and a Pt (4 mg/cm2) cathode catalyst. It was shown that methanol crossover increased by increasing cell temperature, methanol concentration, methanol flow rate, cathode flow rate and decreasing cathode backpressure. Also, it was revealed that the efficiency of the DMFC was closely related with methanol crossover, and significantly improved as the cell temperature and cathode backpressure increased and methanol concentration decreased.  相似文献   

4.
Direct methanol fuel cells using an alkaline anion exchange membrane (AAEM) were prepared, studied, and optimized. The effects of fuel composition and electrode materials were investigated. Membrane electrode assemblies fabricated with Tokuyama® AAEM and commercial noble metal catalysts achieved peak power densities between 25 and 168 mW cm−2 depending on the operating temperature, fuel composition, and electrode materials used. Good electrode wettability at the anode was found to be very important for achieving high power densities. The performance of the best AAEM cells was comparable to Nafion®-based cells under similar conditions. Factors limiting the performance of AAEM MEAs were found to be different from those of Nafion® MEAs. Improved electrode kinetics for methanol oxidation in alkaline electrolyte at Pt-Ru are apparent at low current densities. At high current densities, rapid CO2 production converts the hydroxide anions, necessary for methanol oxidation, to bicarbonate and carbonate: consequently, the membrane and interfacial conductivity are drastically reduced. These phenomena necessitate the use of aqueous potassium hydroxide and wettable electrode materials for efficient hydroxide supply to the anode. However, aqueous hydroxide is not needed at the cathode. Compared to AAEM-based fuel cells, methanol fuel cells based on proton-conducting Nafion® retain better performance at high current densities by providing the benefit of carbon dioxide rejection.  相似文献   

5.
This work has been focused on the characterization of the methanol permeability and fuel cell performance of composite Nafion/PVA membranes in function of their thickness, which ranged from 19 to 97 μm. The composite membranes were made up of Nafion® polymer deposited between polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanofibers. The resistance to methanol permeation of the Nafion/PVA membranes shows a linear variation with the thickness. The separation between apparent and true permeability permits to give an estimated value of 4.0 × 10−7 cm2 s−1 for the intrinsic or true permeability of the bulk phase at the composite membranes. The incorporation of PVA nanofibers causes a remarkable reduction of one order of magnitude in the methanol permeability as compared with pristine Nafion® membranes. The DMFC performances of membrane-electrode assemblies prepared from Nafion/PVA and pristine Nafion® membranes were tested at 45, 70 and 95 °C under various methanol concentrations, i.e., 1, 2 and 3 M. The nanocomposite membranes with thicknesses of 19 μm and 47 μm reached power densities of 211 mW cm−2 and 184 mW cm−2 at 95 °C and 2 M methanol concentration. These results are comparable to those found for Nafion® membranes with similar thickness at the same conditions, which were 210 mW cm−2 and 204 mW cm−2 respectively. Due to the lower amount of Nafion® polymer present within the composite membranes, it is suggested a high degree of utilization of Nafion® as proton conductive material within the Nafion/PVA membranes, and therefore, significant savings in the consumed amount of Nafion® are potentially able to be achieved. In addition, the reinforcement effect caused by the PVA nanofibers offers the possibility of preparing membranes with very low thickness and good mechanical properties, while on the other hand, pristine Nafion® membranes are unpractical below a thickness of 50 μm.  相似文献   

6.
We compared the performance of the membrane electrode assembly for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) composed of a pore-filling polymer electrolyte membrane (PF membrane) with that composed of a commercial Nafion-117 membrane. In DMFC tests, the methanol crossover flux was 23% lower in the PF membrane than in the Nafion-117 membrane even though the thickness of the PF membrane was 43% that of Nafion-117. This led to a higher DMFC performance and the lower overpotential of the cathode of the PF membrane. Feeding an aqueous 10 M methanol solution at 50 °C produced a low cathode overpotential, as low as 0.40 V at 0.2 A in the PF membrane, whereas the potential was 0.65 V at 0.2 A in the Nafion-117 membrane. In contrast, the ohmic loss and anode overpotential were almost the same in the two membranes. We confirmed that a reduction in methanol crossover using the PF membrane results in lower cathode overpotential and higher DMFC performance. In addition, the electro-osmotic coefficient was estimated as 1.3 in the PF membrane and 2.6 in Nafion-117, based on a water mass-balance model and values showing that the PF membrane prevents the flooding of the cathode at a low gas flow rate using. A highly concentrated methanol solution can be applied as a fuel without decreasing DMFC performance using PF membranes.  相似文献   

7.
Despite serious methanol crossover issues in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFCs), the use of high-concentration methanol fuel is highly demanded to improve the energy density of passive fuel DMFC systems for portable applications. In this paper, the effects of a hydrophobic anode micro-porous layer (MPL) and cathode air humidification are experimentally studied as a function of the methanol-feed concentration. It is found in polarization tests that the anode MPL dramatically influences cell performance, positively under high-concentration methanol-feed but negatively under low-concentration methanol-feed, which indicates that methanol transport in the anode is considerably altered by the presence of the anode MPL. In addition, the experimental data show that cathode air humidification has a beneficial effect on cell performance due to the enhanced backflow of water from the cathode to the anode and the subsequent dilution of the methanol concentration in the anode catalyst layer. Using an advanced membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with the anode MPL and cathode air humidification, we report that the maximum power density of 78 mW/cm2 is achieved at a methanol-feed concentration of 8 M and cell operating temperature of 60 °C. This paper illustrates that the anode MPL and cathode air humidification are key factors to successfully operate a DMFC with high-concentration methanol fuel.  相似文献   

8.
A novel approach has been proposed to improve the water management of a passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) fed with neat methanol without increasing its volume or weight. By adopting perforated covers with different open ratios at the cathode, the water management has been significantly improved in a DMFC fed with neat methanol. An optimized cathode open ratio could ensure both the sufficient supply of oxygen and low water loss. While changing the open ratio of anode vaporizer can adjust the methanol crossover rate in a DMFC. Furthermore, the gas mixing layer, added between the anode vaporizer and the anode current collector to increase the mass transfer resistance, can improve the cell performance, decrease the methanol crossover, and increase the fuel efficiency. For the case of a DMFC fed with neat methanol, an anode vaporizer with the open ratio of 12% and a cathode open ratio of 20% produced the highest peak power density, 22.7 mW cm−2, and high fuel efficiency, 70.1%, at room temperature of 25 ± 1 °C and ambient humidity of 25-50%.  相似文献   

9.
Direct methanol fuel cell operation with uniaxially pre-stretched recast Nafion® membranes (draw ratio of 4) was investigated and compared to that with commercial (un-stretched) Nafion®. The effects of membrane thickness (60–250 μm) and methanol feed concentration (0.5–10.0 M) on fuel cell power output were quantified for a cell temperature of 60 °C, ambient pressure air, and anode/cathode catalyst loadings of 4.0 mg cm−2. Pre-stretched recast Nafion® in the 130–180 μm thickness range produced the highest power at 0.4 V (84 mW cm−2), as compared to 58 mW cm−2 for Nafion® 117. MEAs with pre-stretched recast Nafion® consistently out-performed Nafion® 117 at all methanol feed concentrations, with 33–48% higher power densities at 0.4 V, due to a combination of low area-specific resistance (the use of a thinner pre-stretched membrane, where the conductivity was the same as that for commercial Nafion®) and low methanol crossover (due to low methanol solubility in the membrane). Very high power was generated with a 180-μm thick pre-stretched recast Nafion® membrane by increasing the cell temperature to 80 °C, increasing the anode/cathode catalyst loading to 8.0 mg cm−2, and increasing the cathode air pressure to 25 psig. Under these conditions the power density at 0.4 V for a 1.0-M methanol feed solution was 240 mW cm−2 and the maximum power density was 252 mW cm−2.  相似文献   

10.
The electrochemical production of hydrogen (H2) from liquid methanol in acidic aqueous media was investigated in a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser, comprising a two-compartment glass cell with a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) composed of a Nafion® 117 membrane and gas diffusion electrodes (GDE). Methanol electrolysis was studied at concentrations ranging from 0 to 16 M, where 0 M corresponds to water electrolysis. The influence of catalysts (Pt and Pt–Ru), catalyst support (C or black), operating temperatures (23, 50 and 75 °C) and operating modes (dry and wet cathode) were evaluated in the static mode. A theoretical thermodynamic analysis of the system was done as a function of temperature. The limiting current densities, kinetic parameters, including the Tafel slopes and current exchange density, and apparent activation energies were determined.  相似文献   

11.
《Journal of power sources》2006,162(2):1232-1235
A vapor fed passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) is proposed to achieve a high energy density by using pure methanol for mobile applications. Vapor is provided from a methanol reservoir to the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) through a vaporizer, barrier and buffer layer. With a composite membrane of lower methanol cross-over and diffusion layers of hydrophilic nanomaterials, the humidity of the MEA was enhanced by water back diffusion from the cathode to the anode through the membrane in these passive DMFCs. The humidity in the MEA due to water back diffusion results in the supply of water for an anodic electrochemical reaction with a low membrane resistance. The vapor fed passive DMFC with humidified MEA maintained 20–25 mW cm−2 power density for 360 h and performed with a 70% higher fuel efficiency and 1.5 times higher energy density when compared with a liquid fed passive DMFC.  相似文献   

12.
Passive direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are considered interesting candidates for small-scale power applications. We investigated the performance in passive DMFCs of the PtRu catalyst supported on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrene-4-sulphonate (pEDOT-pSS), a Nafion®-free, mixed electronic–protonic conductor that assures electronic transport for methanol oxidation at the anode and provides the proton movement. The DMFCs were assembled with Vulcan XC-72R carbon/Pt (in excess) cathode, Nafion® 117 membranes and 1 M CH3OH, and long-time performance data are reported and discussed.  相似文献   

13.
Use of highly concentrated methanol fuel is required for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) to compete with the energy density of Li-ion batteries. Because one mole of H2O is needed to oxidize one mole of methanol (CH3OH) in the anode, low water crossover to the cathode or even water back flow from the cathode into the anode is a prerequisite for using highly concentrated methanol. It has previously been demonstrated that low or negative water crossover can be realized by the incorporation of a low-α membrane electrode assembly (MEA), which is essentially an MEA designed for optimal water management, using, e.g. hydrophobic anode and cathode microporous layers (aMPL and cMPL). In this paper we extend the low-α MEA concept to include an anode transport barrier (aTB) between the backing layer and hydrophobic aMPL. The main role of the aTB is to act as a barrier to CH3OH and H2O diffusion between a water-rich anode catalyst layer (aCL) and a methanol-rich fuel feed. The primary role of the hydrophobic aMPL in this MEA is to facilitate a low (or negative) water crossover to the cathode. Using a previously developed 1D, two-phase DMFC model, we show that this novel design yields a cell with low methanol crossover (i.e. high fuel efficiency, ∼80%, at a typical operating current density of ∼80-90% of the cell limiting current density), while directly feeding high concentration methanol fuel into the anode. The physics of how the aTB and aMPL work together to accomplish this is fully elucidated. We further show that a thicker, more hydrophilic, more permeable aTB, and thicker, more hydrophobic, and less permeable aMPL are most effective in accomplishing low CH3OH and H2O crossover.  相似文献   

14.
《Journal of power sources》2004,137(2):248-256
Research into the development of direct methanol alkaline fuel cell (DMAFC) using an anion exchange polymer electrolyte membrane is described. The commercial membrane used had a higher electric resistance, but a lower methanol diffusion coefficient than Nafion® membranes. Fuel cell tests were performed using carbon supported Pt catalyst, and the effect of temperature, methanol concentration, methanol flow rate, air pressure and Pt loading were investigated. It was found that the cell performance improved drastically with a membrane assembly electrode (MEA) which did not include the gas diffusion layer on the anode, because of lower reactant mass transfer resistance. To give suitable cathode performance, humidification of the air and a subtle balance between the air pressure and water transport is required.  相似文献   

15.
Surface-modified Nafion® membrane was prepared by casting proton-conducting polyelectrolyte complexes on the surface of Nafion®. The casting layer is homogeneous and its thickness is about 900 nm. The proton conductivity of modified Nafion® is slightly lower than that of plain Nafion®; however, its methanol permeability is 41% lower than that of plain Nafion®. The single cells with modified Nafion® exhibit higher open circuit voltage (OCV = 0.73 V) and maximal power density (Pmax = 58 mW cm−2) than the single cells with plain Nafion® (OCV = 0.67 V, Pmax = 49 mW cm−2). It is a simple, efficient, cost-effective approach to modifying Nafion® by casting proton-conducting materials on the surface of Nafion®.  相似文献   

16.
The present work consists of a tubular-shaped direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) that is operated completely passively with methanol solution stored in a central fuel reservoir. The benefit of a tubular-shaped DMFC over a planar-shaped DMFC is the higher instantaneous volumetric power energy density (power/volume) associated with the larger active area provided by the tubular geometry. Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) with identical compositions were installed in both tubular and planar-shaped, passive DMFCs and tested with 1, 2, and 3 M methanol solutions at room temperature. The peak power density for the tubular DMFC was 19.0 mW cm−2 and 24.5 mW cm−2 while the peak power density for the planar DMFC was 20.0 mW cm−2 and 23.0 mW cm−2 with Nafion® 212 and 115 MEAs, respectively. Even though the performance of the fuel cell improved with each increase in methanol concentration, the fuel and energy efficiencies decreased for both the tubular and planar geometries due to increased methanol crossover. The tubular DMFC experienced higher methanol crossover potentially due to a higher static fluid pressure in the anode fuel reservoir (AFR) caused by the vertical orientation of the tubular fuel reservoir. The performance of the tubular DMFC in this work represents an 870% improvement in power density from the previous best, passive, tubular DMFC found in the literature.  相似文献   

17.
Anion exchange membrane fumasep® FAA-2 was characterized with ex and in situ methods in order to estimate the membranes’ suitability as an electrolyte for an alkaline direct methanol fuel cell (ADMFC). The interactions of this membrane with water, hydroxyl ions and methanol were studied with both calorimetry and NMR and compared with the widely used proton exchange membrane Nafion® 115. The results indicate that FAA-2 has a tighter structure and more homogeneous distribution of ionic groups in contrast to the clustered structure of Nafion, moreover, the diffusion of OH ions through this membrane is clearly slower compared to water molecules. The permeability of methanol through the FAA-2 membrane was found to be an order of magnitude lower than for Nafion. Fuel cell experiments in 1 mol dm−3 methanol with FAA-2 resulted in OCV of 0.58 V and maximum power density of 0.32 mW cm−2. However, even higher current densities were obtained with highly concentrated fuels. This implies that less water is needed for fuel dilution, thereby decreasing the mass of the fuel cell system. In addition, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for the ADMFC was used to determine ohmic resistance of the cell facilitating the further membrane development.  相似文献   

18.
A series of hydrocarbon membranes consisting of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), sulfosuccinic acid (SSA) and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) were synthesized and characterized for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) applications. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra confirm a semi-interpenetrating (SIPN) structure based on a cross-linked PVA/SSA network and penetrating PVP molecular chains. A SIPN membrane with 20% PVP (SIPN-20) exhibits a proton conductivity value comparable to Nafion® 115 (1.0 × 10−2 S cm−1 for SIPN-20 and 1.4 × 10−2 S cm−1 for Nafion® 115). Specifically, SIPN membranes reveal excellent methanol resistance for both sorption and transport properties. The methanol self-diffusion coefficient through a SIPN-20 membrane conducted by pulsed field-gradient nuclear magnetic resonance (PFG-NMR) technology measures 7.67 × 10−7 cm2 s−1, which is about one order of magnitude lower than that of Nafion® 115. The methanol permeability of SIPN-20 membrane is 5.57 × 10−8 cm2 s−1, which is about one and a half order of magnitude lower than Nafion® 115. The methanol transport behaviors of SIPN-20 and Nafion® 115 membranes correlate well with their sorption characteristics. Methanol uptake in a SIPN-20 membrane is only half that of Nafion® 115. An extended study shows that a membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) made of SIPN-20 membrane exhibits a power density comparable to Nafion® 115 with a significantly higher open current voltage. Accordingly, SIPN membranes with a suitable PVP content are considered good methanol barriers, and suitable for DMFC applications.  相似文献   

19.
Comprehensive analytical and numerical analyses were performed, focusing on anode water loss, cathode flooding, and water equilibrium for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. General features of water transport as a function of membrane thickness and current density were presented to illustrate the net effect of back-diffusion of water from the cathode to anode over a polymer electrolyte fuel cell domain. First, two-dimensional numerical simulation were performed, showing that the difference in molar concentration of water at the channel outlet is widened as the operating current density increases with a thin membrane (Nafion®Nafion® 111), which was verified by Dong et al. [Distributed performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cells under low-humidity conditions. J Electrochem Soc 2005; 152: A2114–22]. Then, analytical solutions were compared with computational results in predicting those characteristics of water transport phenomena. It was theoretically estimated that the high pressure operation of fuel cells expedites water condensing and results in shorter anode water loss and cathode flooding locations. In this study, it was also found that a thin membrane (Nafion®Nafion® 111) facilitates water transport in the through-membrane direction and therefore water concentration at the anode and cathode channel outlets reaches an equilibrium state particularly at low operating current densities. Moreover, the difference in the anode water concentration between Nafion®Nafion® 111 and Nafion®Nafion® 115 membranes becomes intensified in the in-plane direction under the same water production condition, while the cathode water concentration profiles remains almost same.  相似文献   

20.
An ultra-thin, free-standing proton-conductive membrane of Nafion®/Phosphosilicate/Nafion® (NPN) with a sandwich structure has been prepared. The NPN membrane of thickness 960 nm shows extremely low methanol permeability of 1 × 10−8 cm2 s−1, and area specific resistance (ASR) smaller than 0.2 Ω cm2.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号