Esthetic and prosthetic procedures in single-tooth replacement

Loss of anterior maxillary teeth always results in bone resorption and loss of interdental papillae, and the resorption makes a single tooth replacement by a dental implant very difficult. When infections have been present and the patient's history shows previous surgery at the apex of the root, bone destruction is substantial, which results in an increased resorption defect, thereby further increasing the aesthetic and prosthetic problems. This paper describes the steps necessary for implant surgery and the prosthetics; a brief summary is provided. The quality and quantity of bone, along with the space available between the adjacent teeth, are the basic factors in treatment planning and determine the type of implant to be used. Some resorption and bone defects are usually present after a tooth extraction, and bone regeneration procedures can be performed either before or simultaneously with the implant placement, with numerous flap designs available. Soft tissue augmentation can be achieved by taking a connective tissue graft from the palatal side. Antirotational devices (eg, hex lock abutments) are necessary for all implants in single tooth replacement. Screw-retained abutments can be used in posterior areas and in angled positions in facial areas as well. With proper single tooth implant position, cementation of laboratory fabricated crowns can be considered.     

Prognosis versus actual outcome. III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival

Tooth loss for 100 treated periodontal patients (2,509 teeth) under maintenance care was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of commonly taught clinical parameters utilized in the assignment of prognosis in accurately predicting tooth survival. Previous studies in this series evaluated prognosis as a surrogate variable representing the condition of the tooth at a particular point. In this study, survival analysis was used to evaluate the relationship of these common clinical parameters to an actual end point, tooth loss. Robust log rank tests indicated that initial probing depth, initial furcation involvement, initial mobility, initial crown-to-root ratio, and initial root form were all associated with tooth loss. In addition, smoking and increased initial bone loss were both found to be associated with increased risk of tooth loss while fixed abutment status was associated with a decreased risk of tooth loss. A Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that initial probing depth, initial furcation involvement, initial mobility, initial percent bone loss, presence of a parafunctional habit without a biteguard, and smoking were all associated with an increased risk of tooth loss. This model suggests that patients are twice as likely to loose their teeth if there is increasing mobility, if they have a parafunctional habit and do not wear a biteguard, or if they smoke. From these data there does appear to be a relationship between the assigned prognosis and tooth loss. Teeth with worse prognosis have a worse survival rate, but the commonly taught clinical parameters used in the traditional method of assignment of prognosis do not adequately explain that relationship. Furthermore, initial prognosis did not adequately explain the condition of the tooth or accurately predict the tooth's survival. These results seem to indicate that the effect of these clinical parameters on tooth survival is only partially reflected in the assigned prognosis initially, suggesting that perhaps some of the clinical parameters should be weighed more heavily than others when assigning prognosis. Further studies are needed to develop a more accurate method for the assignment of prognosis.     

Using sound dental principles to salvage the compromised implant case

Implant failure can usually be determined by biologic and biomechanical factors that were not addressed during treatment planing and case design. In order to salvage the failing implant-supported prosthesis, these factors must be identified and corrected. Long-term success can only be achieved when prosthetic design, osseous and soft tissue architecture, and implant biomechanics are diagnosed and corrected.     

Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Implant treatment in the United Kingdom has been provided mainly in specialist, regional dental hospitals. However, increasingly, general dentists are providing implant-supported prostheses in a private office setting. PURPOSE: This study investigated the nature, timing, and frequency of complications associated with single tooth implant therapy in a dental hospital and two dental offices. METHODS: The dental records of 58 patients provided with 76 implants during the period of 1989-95 were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty-three single tooth crowns on implants were placed by general dentists and 23 by specialists in the dental hospital. RESULTS: Implant survival rate was 96%. Twenty-eight guided bone regeneration procedures were required, including 13 unplanned ones. Prosthodontic complications included the need for recontouring of three crowns and the recementation of three crowns. Only two abutment screws required retightening. Peri-implant soft tissue inflammation occurred around six crowns and recession around two. CONCLUSION: The single tooth implant-supported crown appears to be an effective and durable restorative treatment with a relatively low prevalence of postoperative complications.     

The extracted tooth pontic--provisional replacement during bone graft and implant healing

When tooth extraction is required, a provisional restoration may be utilized as an interim prosthesis during bone graft and implant healing. The selection of provisional replacement of the anterior teeth following extraction may have a direct influence on the success of the definitive tooth replacement. This article describes a technique for using the extracted tooth or a denture tooth as an interim prosthesis during bone graft and implant healing. This method of provisionalization offers several advantages, including no adjacent tooth preparation, natural appearance, and retention of the papillae.     

Restoring the single lower incisor implant with esthetics, antirotation, and retrievability

The long-term success of restoring the lower incisor implant is partially dependent on retrievability of all components down to the implant. Because this implant is usually placed vertically or buccally in the bone, the ability to achieve esthetics without seeing the screw access hole becomes critical. The emergence profile of the crown overlying the implant fixture ultimately dictates the esthetics. The single crown can also become loose during function and, therefore, antirotation of the abutment is imperative. The Octa-Hex Implant Restoration System presents an alternative method of achieving gingival seal with a titanium-alloy connector to the implant, emergence profile with a custom-fabricated casting on this connector, antirotation from intimate contact with implant indexing, and retrievability by a fixation screw and cementation. With the lower incisor, this system offers retrievability without the screw access hole affecting esthetics.     

Available bone is the foremost criterion in the insertion of endosteal implants

The foremost criterion in the insertion of endosteal implants is bone availability. Implant dentists should consider first the amount of available bone of the edentulous ridge where the endosteal implant will be inserted. A common error and cause of many implant failures is the dentist's use of an implant modality which is not indicated for the density and morphology of the available bone in the edentulous ridge. Implant modality/system is not the primary criterion in the insertion of endosteal implants. Before the dentist inserts an endosteal implant, he should gauge or measure the amount of bone where the implant is intended to be placed. It should be measured in width, height, length, trajectory, and implant-crown ratio. After recording the measurements of the available bone, these should be placed in different categories to serve as guides in implant selection. If there is not enough bone for the endosteal implant, bone modification should be performed. This can be done either by osteoplasty or ridge augmentation with the use of bone grafting materials. Aside from the amount of available bone in the edentulous ridge, another very, very important thing that should be considered is the quality or its density. Any biocompatible implant demonstrates some osseointegrated surfaces depending upon the bone type into which it is placed and the loads placed upon it. Implant body must exhibit a macrogeometry suitable for acceptable levels of force transfer to the surrounding tissues as well as for implantation into a bony site of a particular anatomic size.     

Hard-tissue augmentation for the placement of anterior dental implants

Dental implants have become a popular alternative for replacing missing teeth in every region of the oral cavity. In the anterior zone, special esthetic concerns require not only a stably anchored implant for long-term success, but also the presence of adequate hard and soft peri-implant tissues. Anterior tooth loss is often accompanied by considerable loss of alveolar bone, so augmenting hard tissue before or in combination with implant placement becomes a critical part of therapy. One of the most successful augmentation techniques is guided bone regeneration (GBR). Thus far, augmentation procedures using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes (ePTFEa) have proved to be the most efficient and predictable surgical technique to enhance deficient bone sites. This article discusses some critical biological and clinical/technical aspects of GBR and describes techniques for anterior hard-tissue augmentation with the photographic documentations of three clinical cases.     

Loaded and nonloaded titanium versus hydroxyapatite-coated threaded implants in the canine mandible

A commercially pure titanium threaded implant was compared to a hydroxyapatite-coated threaded implant of similar geometric design and dimensions in the canine model. Bilateral posterior implants supported fixed prostheses, and some implants in the same mandibles served as unloaded control implants. Implants were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and histomorphometrically at the light microscope level to detect any differences in bone response to loaded conditions. No statistically significant differences were found between the two implant designs under loaded or nonloaded conditions with regard to mobility, probing depth, percentage of osseointegration, and crestal bone position.     

Altered patterns of DNA methylation on chromosomes from leukemia cell lines: identification of 5-methylcytosines by indirect immunodetection

The feasibility of implant treatment in patients after oral ablative tumor surgery has not yet been investigated with consideration of the requisite high periodontal standards. A report on this topic has to deal not only with implant survival but also with implant health, bone response, soft tissue health, failure pattern, time of failure, and ease of restoration. For the assessment of an implant system, an overview must be accomplished that takes into account the different restorations used and their interaction with the implant system that was used. This study presents the Bone-Lock implant system (Howmedica Leibinger GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) in a retrospective investigation after 5 years of follow-up with special emphasis on the prosthetic restorations used following resection of oral malignancies. From early in 1990 through June 1996, we inserted 210 dental endosteal Bone-Lock implants (58 patients) after oral tumor resectioning. Included in the study were 45 patients with 162 implants and prosthetic restorations that had been loaded for 1 year (dentures retained by telescopic or bar-clip or ball attachments, implant-supported prostheses, tooth-to-implant connected bridges). Regular follow-up consisted of evaluation of the Plaque Index (Silness and L?e) and of the Sulcus Bleeding Index (L?e), measurements of pocket probing depth, implant mobility (by means of the Periotest method), bone resorption (according to X-ray findings), and a questionnaire that registered patient satisfaction. The results were evaluated for each restoration and were compared with baseline standards. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.2%. For implants that had been in place for over 365 days, the survival rate was 93%. The investigation showed that after resection of oral malignancies, patients could be treated with dental implants and superstructures with long-term efficacy similar to that found in healthy subjects considering internationally accepted standards. Implant treatment in tumor patients appeared to offer the most positive periodontic results when use of bar-clip or telescope-retained overdentures was involved. The patient satisfaction level with the described prosthodontic treatment was satisfactory.     

Characterization of two avian reoviruses that exhibit strain-specific quantitative differences in their syncytium-inducing and pathogenic capabilities

This report outlines the experimental, surgical, and prosthodontic protocols for a prospective clinical trial using the Endopore dental implant to replace single maxillary teeth. Twenty patients (10 male, 10 female) ranging in age from 30 to 60 years each received one implant (mean length 10.1 mm), which, after an initial healing period of 4 months, was restored with a single crown. Records collected included radiographs, Periotest mobility measurements, supragingival Plaque Index, and an assessment of peri-implant soft tissue health using pocket probing depths, sulcular bleeding following probing, and probing attachment levels. Radiographs were exposed at predetermined intervals following crown placement (1 and 6 months, and then yearly) in a standardized procedure using a specialized filmholder that attaches to each implant after removal of the crown. At the time of this preliminary report, all of the 20 implants placed had been uncovered and were in function; 16 of the implants had been in function for 6 months or more, 14 had passed 1 year of function, and 3 had passed the 2-year function point. There have been no failures to date.     

Maintaining esthetic restorations in the periodontal practice

The aim of present study was to correlate the changes in the peri-implant tissues occurring after functional loading of non-submerged titanium implants and assessed by radiographic, clinical and mobility measurements. 11 patients with distal extension situations received 18 implants of the ITI Dental Implant System. After a healing period of 3 months, the suprastructures were fabricated and seated 5 months post-surgically. For the assessment of peri-implant bone changes, standardized vertical bitewing radiographs with reproducible exposure geometry were evaluated using computer assisted densitometric image analyses (CADIA) and bone height measurements. Since the radiographic evaluations were performed at mesial and distal sites only, the clinical parameters from these implant aspects were included in the analysis. Clinical periodontal parameters modified for the use around implants were obtained, damping characteristics were expressed as Periotest readings and standardized radiographs were obtained at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after loading. In addition, radiographs were also taken at the start of functional loading. The data obtained from this small sample of implants demonstrated a wide range of different tissue alterations when using radiographic, clinical and mobility assessments. The parameters of probing attachment level (PAL) in combination with radiographic parameters obtained at 1, 3, and 6 months after loading were good predictors for the peri-implant tissue status at 2 years. This was shown by means of multiple stepwise regression analyses. Mobility measurements did not reveal valuable predictive information with the statistical models applied. Assessments of probing attachment levels using periodontal probes rendered information on peri-implant tissue alterations, which were closely correlated to the radiographically measurable peri-implant bone changes.     

Augmentation rhinoplasty by subcutaneous midline forehead flap simultaneous with implant removal

Implant exposure after augmentation rhinoplasty with alloplastic materials is usually associated with some degree of infection, and it is commonplace to remove the implant and wait for several months before re-augmentation. However, some patients cannot accept the resultant deformity after implant removal. We introduced the midline forehead flap for augmentation simultaneous to the removal and obtained favorable results, even when considering the donor site scar on the forehead. We report the surgical technique and two patients treated with this procedure. The advantages and disadvantages of this procedure are also discussed.     

Sir Colin MacKenzie and the Institute of Anatomy

Implant therapy can be used to build permanent restorations when there is loss of osseous and dental structures. In diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis, permanent restorations utilizing implants could improve masticatory function. However, because of the probability of bone separation, the presence of an inadequate blood supply and the possibility of exacerbating the disease, implant therapy should be used with caution in the majority of patients. Certainly the operative sites should not be placed in the midst of these lesions. Questions exist as to their placement in unaffected portions of the jaws.     

Bone rehabilitation to achieve optimal aesthetics

Treatment involving oral implants has established a high success rate, including implant survival on a long-term basis. The challenge facing the clinicians today is to achieve an optimal long-term aesthetic result. To address this challenge, the volume of the underlying hard and soft tissue must be restored either prior to or simultaneously with the implant placement. The learning objective of this article is to review the critical biologic and clinical criteria essential in achieving a predictable success in aesthetic enhancement of the implant site. The article discusses the five phases of ridge reconstruction, utilization of bone grafts (with or without membranes), and the use of membranes alone. Soft tissue management and augmentation in aesthetic and nonaesthetic regions are differentiated and presented. Surgical complications are recognized as a clinical reality, and exposure of the membranes is evaluated and discussed. Four cases are used to describe and illustrate the clinical procedure.     

The clinical aspects of hydrocephalus in children

The removal of tooth structure during preparation results in varying degrees of pulpal hyperemia. The ability of the pulpal tissue to respond either by recovery or degeneration depends in part upon the adequacy and fit of the provisional restoration. The response of the gingival tissue also depends on a large degree on the success of the temporary coverage. Provisional restorations are commonly given less attention and importance thereby biologic, mechanical, and esthetic considerations are not adequately met. Since a provisional restoration must be made or improvised during the same appointment in which the abutment teeth are prepared, costly chairside time most often leads to an unacceptable restoration. Failures such as color instability, color incompatibility, inappropriate anatomic contours, fractures, occlusal disharmony, changes in tooth position, gingival inflammation, and unhealthy periodontal conditions are usually encountered. A technique of fabricating an exacting provisional restoration with compliance to optimum quality is presented.     

Post-insertion peri-implant tissue assessment: a longitudinal study

The peri-implant gingivae act as a biological barrier that prevents the ingress of plaque bacteria, oral debris, and saliva components into the internal environment of the jaw. The integrity of this barrier around a total of 163 Steri-Oss HA-coated threaded root-form implants placed in 48 patients was examined at six-month intervals over a 42-month time period, beginning at the time of final prosthetic placement. Five clinical parameters for tissue assessment were used: Mean Implant Sulcus Readings (MISR), Mühlemann Sulcus Bleeding Index (SBI), Miller's Mobility Index (MI), bone loss readings (BL), and gingival condition (GI). Bone loss and mobility were negligible throughout the 42-month study period. At six months post-insertion, 58.6% of the Mean Implant Sulcus Readings exceeded 4 mm. Gingival conditions and bleeding response also were non-ideal in a significant number of cases (52.9 and 62.1%, respectively). However, all three of these assessments later showed dramatic improvement. Patients' inability to "deplaque" their newly acquired implant prostheses effectively may be a factor contributing to the high incidence of undesirable pocket depths and non-optimal gingival appearance at the first six-month assessment point. Attainment of the necessary skills may account for the improved readings at the later evaluations.     

Acute liver failure

PURPOSE: This article reviews the literature on radiographic imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE was used to identify published peer-reviewed literature for this report. RESULTS: Radiographic images are indispensable in the evaluation of osseous structures when planning treatment for dental implants. Potential bone sites for implant placement can be assessed clinically by means of palpation or probing through the mucosa; however, diagnostic imaging provides the best means for indirectly measuring bone dimensions. After healing of the implant site, the application of radiology is useful to verify the amount of bone adjacent to the implant and that the transmucosal abutments fit the implant. Upon completion of the implant prosthesis, radiology may be used to monitor initial and long-term success of implant treatment. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for the application of radiology over the course of treatment are made for various implant cases ranging from the overdenture to the single-tooth implant.     

Survival of cylindrical implants in composite grafted maxillary sinuses

PURPOSE: This retrospective study investigated the survival of dental implants placed in the maxilla after composite grafting of the sinus and an average of 55 months of loading. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maxillary sinuses of 88 patients were grafted with autogenous cancellous bone combined with dense hydroxyapatite particles. After an average healing period of 3.4 months, hydroxyapatite-coated titanium endosseous implants were placed. A total of 388 implants were placed in grafted sinus floors, and 82 were placed in onlay grafted nonsinus position in the canine region. The implants were loaded with overdentures and fixed bridges 4 months (mean) after implantation, with a follow-up for a mean of 55 months. RESULTS: The cumulative implant survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Implant survival from the time of loading was 89% in full reconstructed cases and 90% in partially edentulous cases. The overall cumulative implant survival rate, including the loss in the surgical stage, was 82%. CONCLUSION: Implant loss in composite grafted maxillae after 70 months of follow-up was similar to loss in nongrafted maxillae.     

Closed or open periodontitis treatment. A review of the literature

Clinical data characterizing the results of non-surgical, conservative versus surgical modalities of periodontal treatment are presented and summarized, as they appeared in the international literature. Primarily, the clinical disease status prior to treatment is discussed. Thereafter, the therapeutic success of either modality was measured on the basis of the following parameters: reduction of probing depth, changes in attachment levels, cleanliness of root surfaces, elimination of inflammation, and longlasting tooth survival. The literature review revealed that the choice of either treatment modality influences the therapeutic success only indirectly. More important is that the diseased root surface is meticulously cleaned from all bacterial debris. In the presence of shallow (1 to 3 mm) and medium-sized (4 to 6 mm) pockets, surgical and non-surgical treatment provides equally good results. Deep pockets (7 mm or deeper) and, in particular, crater-like bony pockets as well as furcation involvement respond with better results, if surgical treatment is assigned. In the long run, however, therapeutic success can be secured only by means of a consequent periodical recall and with support of the patient's willingness to perform optimal oral hygiene.