A hybrid sufficient performance measure approach to improve robustness and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization

The stable convergence and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) using performance measure approach (PMA) are the major issue to develop the reliability methods based on modified chaos control (MCC), hybrid chaos control (HCC) and finite-step length adjustment (FSL). However, these methods may be inefficient for RBDO problems with convex and concave probabilistic constraints. In this paper, an adaptive modified chaos control (AMC) is proposed to provide the robust and efficient results in RBDO. The proposed AMC is adjusted using dynamical chaos control factor, which is extracted using sufficient descent condition for PMA. Using sufficient criterion, the proposed AMC is adaptively combined with advanced mean value (AMV) to improve the performance of PMA, named as hybrid adaptive modified chaos control (HAMC). Considering the robustness and efficiency, the proposed HAMC is compared with several existing reliability methods by three nonlinear structural/mathematical performance functions and two RBDO problems. The results indicate that the proposed HAMC with sufficient descent condition provides superior convergences in terms of both robustness and efficiency, compared to existing PMA methods using AMV, MCC, HCC and FSL.

     

Iterative reliable design space approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization

Engineering with Computers - Reliability-based design optimization has gained much attention in many engineering design problems with the consideration of uncertainties. Nevertheless, the...     

A hybrid self-adjusted single-loop approach for reliability-based design optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - Single-loop approach (SLA) exhibits higher efficiency than both double-loop and decoupled approaches for solving reliability-based design...     

A probabilistic feasible region approach for reliability-based design optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a useful tool for design optimization when considering the probabilistic characteristics of the...     

A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization

This paper develops an efficient methodology to perform reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) by decoupling the optimization and reliability analysis iterations that are nested in traditional formulations. This is achieved by approximating the reliability constraints based on the reliability analysis results. The proposed approach does not use inverse first-order reliability analysis as other existing decoupled approaches, but uses direct reliability analysis. This strategy allows a modular approach and the use of more accurate methods, including Monte-Carlo-simulation (MCS)-based methods for highly nonlinear reliability constraints where first-order reliability approximation may not be accurate. The use of simulation-based methods also enables system-level reliability estimates to be included in the RBDO formulation. The efficiency of the proposed RBDO approach is further improved by identifying the potentially active reliability constraints at the beginning of each reliability analysis. A vehicle side impact problem is used to examine the proposed method, and the results show the usefulness of the proposed method.     

Convergence control of single loop approach for reliability-based design optimization

For solution of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problems, single loop approach (SLA) shows high efficiency. Thus SLA is extensively used in RBDO. However, the iteration solution procedure by SLA is often oscillatory and non-convergent for RBDO with nonlinear performance function. This prevents the application of SLA to engineering design problems. In this paper, the chaotic single loop approach (CLSA) is proposed to achieve the convergence control of original iterative algorithm in SLA. The modification involves automated selection of the chaos control factor by solving a novel one-dimensional optimization model. Additionally, a new oscillation-checking method is constructed to detect the oscillation of iterative process of design variables. The computational capability of CLSA is demonstrated through five benchmark examples and one stiffened shell application. The comparison of numerical results indicates that CSLA is more efficient than the double loop approach and the decoupled approach. CSLA also solves the RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance function and non-normal random variables stably.     

A performance measure approach for risk optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for solving reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), where the probability of failure is...     

A probabilistic design system for reliability-based design optimization

A probabilistic design system for reliability-based design optimization problems called ADAPRES_NET is presented in this paper. ADAPRES_NET includes two main features, one of which is the use of an adaptive response surface method by which the probabilistic constraints are replaced with response functions, the other a distributed computing environment by which the computational applications are distributed on a network. The proposed system is presented with an example in which the well-known mechanical part, the connecting rod, is selected. Finally, the evaluation of the probabilistic constraints is also compared with that of the classical reliability methods, and the results indicate the benefit of using ADAPRES_NET.     

Threshold shift method for reliability-based design optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - We present a novel approach, referred to as the “threshold shift method” (TSM), for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). The...     

An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a methodology for finding optimized designs that are characterized with a low probability of failure. Primarily, RBDO consists of optimizing a merit function while satisfying reliability constraints. The reliability constraints are constraints on the probability of failure corresponding to each of the failure modes of the system or a single constraint on the system probability of failure. The probability of failure is usually estimated by performing a reliability analysis. During the last few years, a variety of different formulations have been developed for RBDO. Traditionally, these have been formulated as a double-loop (nested) optimization problem. The upper level optimization loop generally involves optimizing a merit function subject to reliability constraints, and the lower level optimization loop(s) compute(s) the probabilities of failure corresponding to the failure mode(s) that govern(s) the system failure. This formulation is, by nature, computationally intensive. Researchers have provided sequential strategies to address this issue, where the deterministic optimization and reliability analysis are decoupled, and the process is performed iteratively until convergence is achieved. These methods, though attractive in terms of obtaining a workable reliable design at considerably reduced computational costs, often lead to premature convergence and therefore yield spurious optimal designs. In this paper, a novel unilevel formulation for RBDO is developed. In the proposed formulation, the lower level optimization (evaluation of reliability constraints in the double-loop formulation) is replaced by its corresponding first-order Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) necessary optimality conditions at the upper level optimization. Such a replacement is computationally equivalent to solving the original nested optimization if the lower level optimization problem is solved by numerically satisfying the KKT conditions (which is typically the case). It is shown through the use of test problems that the proposed formulation is numerically robust (stable) and computationally efficient compared to the existing approaches for RBDO.     

A cell evolution method for reliability-based design optimization

The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) presents to be a systematic and powerful approach for process designs under uncertainties. The traditional double-loop methods for solving RBDO problems can be computationally inefficient because the inner reliability analysis loop has to be iteratively performed for each probabilistic constraint. To solve RBDOs in an alternative and more effective way, Deb et al. [1] proposed recently the use of evolutionary algorithms with an incorporated fastPMA. Since the imbedded fastPMA needs the gradient calculations and the initial guesses of the most probable points (MPPs), their proposed algorithm would encounter difficulties in dealing with non-differentiable constraints and the effectiveness could be degraded significantly as the initial guesses are far from the true MPPs. In this paper, a novel population-based evolutionary algorithm, named cell evolution method, is proposed to improve the computational efficiency and effectiveness of solving the RBDO problems. By using the proposed cell evolution method, a family of test cells is generated based on the target reliability index and with these reliability test cells the determination of the MPPs for probabilistic constraints becomes a simple parallel calculation task, without the needs of gradient calculations and any initial guesses. Having determined the MPPs, a modified real-coded genetic algorithm is applied to evolve these cells into a final one that satisfies all the constraints and has the best objective function value for the RBDO. Especially, the nucleus of the final cell contains the reliable solution to the RBDO problem. Illustrative examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed cell evolution method in solving RBDOs. Simulation results reveal that the proposed cell evolution method outperforms comparative methods in both the computational efficiency and solution accuracy, especially for multi-modal RBDO problems.     

A reliability-based optimization technique for automatic plastic design

The purpose of this paper is to present a reliability-based computational technique to design optimal plastic structures. In this computation, the correlation between loads and the correlation between plastic moments is accounted for by using a technique which incorporates the effect of the statistical dependence between any two collapse mechanisms. Based on this technique, a computer program was developed which automatically designs optimal plastic structures with up to two hundred collapse mechanisms. Some of the investigation in this paper is concerned also with the sensitivity of the plastic optimal solutions to load and to resistance correlations.     

Novel decoupling method for time-dependent reliability-based design optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - Time-dependent reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) can provide the optimal design parameter solutions for the time-dependent structure, and...     

Application of maximum entropy principle for reliability-based design optimization

The maximum entropy principle (MEP) is used to generate a natural probability distribution among the many possible that have the same moment conditions. The MEP can accommodate higher order moment information and therefore facilitate a higher quality PDF model. The performance of the MEP for PDF estimation is studied by using more than four moments. For the case with four moments, the results are compared with those by the Pearson system. It is observed that as accommodating higher order moment, the estimated PDF converges to the original one. A sensitivity analysis formulation of the failure probability based on the MEP is derived for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) and the accuracy is compared with that by finite difference method (FDM). Two RBDO examples including a realistic three-dimensional wing design are solved by using the derived sensitivity formula and the MEP-based moment method. The results are compared with other methods such as TR-SQP, FAMM + Pearson system, FFMM + Pearson system in terms of accuracy and efficiency. It is also shown that an improvement in the accuracy by including more moment terms can increase numerical efficiency of optimization for the three-dimensional wing design. The moment method equipped with the MEP is found flexible and well adoptable for reliability analysis and design.     

Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization

The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) seeks for the best compromise between cost and safety, by considering system uncertainties. In order to overcome computational difficulties, many formulations have been recently developed, leading to confusion about what method should be selected for a given application, due to the lack of full-scale comparative studies. In this context, the present paper aims at giving an overview of various RBDO approaches which are tested on a benchmark constituted of four examples using mathematical and finite element models, with different levels of difficulties. The study is focused on the three main approaches, namely the two-level approach, the single loop approach and the decoupled approach; for each category, two RBDO formulations are discussed, implemented and tested for numerical examples. The benchmark study allows us to give comprehensive overview of various approaches, to give clear ideas about their capabilities and limitations, and to draw useful conclusions regarding robustness and numerical performance.     

Shared autonomous electric vehicle design and operations under uncertainties: a reliability-based design optimization approach

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - Shared autonomous electric vehicles (SAEVs) are a promising car-sharing service expected to be implemented in the near future. However, existing...     

An efficient procedure for structural reliability-based robust design optimization

This paper focuses on the development of an optimization tool with the aim to obtain robust and reliable designs in short computational time. The robustness measures considered here are the expected value and standard deviation of the performance function involved in the optimization problem. When using these robustness measures combined, the search of optimal design appears as a robust multiobjective optimization (RMO) problem. Reliable design addresses uncertainties to restrict the structural probability of failure. The mathematical formulation for the reliability based robust design optimization (RBRDO) problem is obtained by adding a reliability based constraint into the RMO problem. As both, statistics calculations and the reliability analysis could be very costly, approximation technique based on reduced-order modeling (ROM) is also incorporated in our procedure. The selected ROM is the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method, with the aim to produce fast outputs considering structural non-linear behavior. Moreover, to obtain RBRDO designs with reduced CPU time we propose others developments to be added in the integrated tool. They are: Probabilistic Collocation Method (PCM) to evaluate the statistics of the structural responses and, also, an approximated reliability constraints procedure based on the Performance Measure Approach (PMA) for reliability constraint assessment. Finally, Normal-Boundary Intersection (NBI) or Normalized Normal-Constraint (NNC) multiobjective optimization techniques are employed to obtain fast and even spread Pareto robust designs. To illustrate the application of the proposed tool, optimization studies are conducted for a linear (benchmark) and nonlinear trusses problems. The nonlinear example consider different loads level, exploring the material plasticity. The integrated tool prove to be very effective reducing the computational time by up to five orders of magnitude, when compared to the solutions obtained via classical standard approaches.     

A variable-complexity approach to second-order reliability-based optimization

This paper outlines a new methodology for second-order reliability-based optimization (RBO). A variable-complexity (VC) approach is used to implement a computationally efficient VCRBO algorithm, which reduces the number of costly second-order reliability analyses by using a lower fidelity, scaled mean-value technique during the majority of the constraint assessments. Two numerical examples are presented, which provide a comparison of several standard RBO approaches with the proposed algorithm. The examples include both Gaussian and non-Gaussian uncertainty to introduce significant nonlinearities in the limit state functions (LSFs). The design spaces and LSFs for both examples are presented, along with a discussion of the computational cost associated with the different RBO approaches.