A comparison of estrogen replacement, pravastatin, and combined treatment for the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lipid-altering effects of conjugated estrogens and pravastatin, alone and in combination, in postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 4 parallel groups. Participants (N = 76) were randomly assigned to receive conjugated estrogens, 0.625 mg/d; pravastatin sodium, 20 mg/d; conjugated estrogens plus pravastatin; or a placebo for 16 weeks. RESULTS: Primary end points were changes in serum lipid parameters. Among participants treated with conjugated estrogens, levels of non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (13.0%) and calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (13.5%) decreased, while levels of HDL-C (22.5%) and triglycerides (4.2%) increased. Participants in the pravastatin group achieved reductions of 23.7% and 25.4% in non-HDL-C and calculated LDL-C levels, respectively. Levels of HDL-C increased slightly (3.7%) and triglycerides decreased by 12.1%. Among participants treated with a combination of conjugated estrogens plus pravastatin, the non-HDL-C (-25.2%) and calculated LDL-C (-28.7%) responses were similar to those of the pravastatin group, and the HDL-C response (21.2%) was similar to that observed in the conjugated estrogens group. Triglyceride levels remained similar to baseline (-0.9%) in the combined treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of conjugated estrogens resulted in potentially antiatherogenic changes in levels of non-HDL-C, HDL-C, and calculated LDL-C. The HDL-C response to combined treatment was similar to that observed in women taking conjugated estrogens alone, while the non-HDL-C and LDL-C responses to combined treatment were similar to those produced by pravastatin therapy alone. These findings support the position of the National Cholesterol Education Program that estrogen replacement, with a progestin where indicated, should be given consideration as a therapeutic option for the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women.     

Effect of the novel antiplatelet agent cilostazol on plasma lipoproteins in patients with intermittent claudication

Cilostazol is an antiplatelet agent and vasodilator marketed in Japan for treatment of ischemic symptoms of peripheral vascular disease. It is currently being evaluated in the United States for treatment of symptomatic intermittent claudication (IC). Cilostazol has been shown to improve walking distance in patients with IC. In addition to its reported vasodilator and antiplatelet effects, cilostazol has been proposed to have beneficial effects on plasma lipoproteins. We examined the effect of cilostazol versus placebo on plasma lipoproteins in 189 patients with IC. After 12 weeks of therapy with 100 mg cilostazol BID, plasma triglycerides decreased 15% (P<0.001). Cilostazol also increased plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (10%) and apolipoprotein (apo) A1 (5.7%) significantly (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). Both HDL3 and HDL2 subfractions were increased by cilostazol; however, the greatest percentage increase was observed in HDL2. Individuals with baseline hypertriglyceridemia (>140 mg/dL) experienced the greatest changes in both HDL-C and triglycerides with cilostazol treatment. In that subset of patients, HDL-C was increased 12.2% and triglycerides were decreased 23%. With cilostazol, there was a trend (3%) toward decreased apoB as well as increased apoA1, resulting in a significant (9.8%, P<0.002) increase in the apoA1 to apoB ratio. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were unaffected. Cilostazol treatment resulted in a 35% increase in treadmill walking time (P=0.0015) and a 9.03% increase in ankle-brachial index (P<0.001). These results indicate that in addition to improving the symptoms of IC, cilostazol also favorably modifies plasma lipoproteins in patients with peripheral arterial disease. The mechanism of this effect is currently unknown.     

Effects of docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipoproteins in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of daily dietary supplementation with 1.25 g or 2.5 g of docosahexaenoic (DHA), in the absence of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), on serum lipids and lipoproteins in persons with combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) [serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglycerides 150 to 400 mg/dL]. METHODS: After a 6-week dietary stabilization period, subjects entered a 4-week single-blind placebo (vegetable oil) run-in phase. Those with adequate compliance during the the run-in were randomized into one of three parallel groups (placebo, 1.25, or 2.5 g/day DHA) for 6 weeks of treatment. Supplements were administered in a triglyceride form contained in gelatin capsules. Primary outcome measurements were plasma phospholipid DHA content, serum triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). LDL-C and non-HDL-C. RESULTS: The DHA content of plasma phospholipids increased dramatically (2 to 3 fold) in a dose-dependent manner. Significant (p < 0.05) changes were observed in serum triglycerides (17 to 21% reduction) and HDL-C (6% increase) which were of similar magnitude in both DHA groups. Non-HDL-C [+1.6 (NS) and +5.7% (p < 0.04)] and LDL-C [+9.3% (NS) and +13.6% (p < 0.001)] increased in the DHA treatment groups. All lipid effects reached an apparent steady state within the first 3 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Dietary DHA, in the absence of EPA, can affect lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. The desirable triglyceride and HDL-C changes were present at a dose which did not significantly increased non-HDL-C or LDL-C. These preliminary findings suggest that dietary supplementation with 1.25 g DHA/day, provided in a triglyceride form, may be an effective tool to aid in the management of hypertriglyceridemia.     

Marked increase in plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol after prolonged fasting during Ramadan

We evaluated the effect of the Ramadan fasting on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in normal individuals. Twenty-four healthy subjects were studied before the end of the Ramadan month (Ram) and for 1 mo thereafter. Plasma total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and very-low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) did not change. High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was 30% higher (P < 0.005) at the end of Ram; apolipoprotein A-I also increased (P < 0.0001). Both the ratios of TC to HDL-C and LDL-C to HDL-C (P < 0.001) decreased at Ram. There was a striking nonpharmacologic improvement in plasma HDL-C and ratios of TC to HDL-C and LDL-C to HDL-C, which were most probably induced by eating one large evening meal a day. Further studies to determine the mechanism of this observation are underway.     

Aroused versus calm positive affects as predictors of lipids.

Objective: The authors hypothesized that high-pleasure low-arousal (HPLA) would predict a subsequent decrease of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TRI), as well as a subsequent increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The authors also hypothesized that high-pleasure high-arousal (HPHA) would have the opposite effects on these blood lipids, predicting a subsequent increase of LDL-C and TRI, and a decrease of HDL-C. Design: Participants were 990 male and 595 female apparently healthy employees who underwent a routine periodic health examination at two points in time, Time 1 (T1) and Time 2 (T2), about 24 months apart. Data were analyzed separately for the men and women, and the authors controlled for possible confounders shown in past research to be implicated with hyperlipidemia. Main Outcome Measures: HPHA and HPLA were assessed based on the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale, while LDL-C, TRI, and HDL-C were assessed based on fasting blood samples. Results: For the men, support for our hypotheses was found relative to HDL-C and TRI. The authors did not find support for our hypotheses for thee women. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that for men, the two types of positive affects may have opposite physiological consequences with respect to subsequent changes in blood lipid levels. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Capillary adrenoceptors in rat skeletal muscle

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of death in women in the United States. Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for CAD in both men and women. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and hypertriglyceridemia, especially in association with a dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) phenotype, may be of greater importance in women than in men. The relationship between CAD and dyslipidemia and the therapeutic approach to disorders of lipid metabolism in women have unique features because of the effects of exogenous and endogenous hormones on lipid pathways. Estrogen decreases LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) lipoprotein and increases triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels. Progestogens decrease triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and Lp(a), and they increase LDL cholesterol. Thus, oral contraceptives increase plasma triglycerides, whereas the effect of these agents on LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels is related to the androgenicity and dose of progestogen. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy increases triglycerides and decreases LDL cholesterol. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on HDL cholesterol is influenced by the addition of progestogen. Although no primary prevention studies have analyzed lipid lowering and CAD in women, secondary prevention studies have suggested that the response to drug treatment and the benefit of lipid lowering are similar in women and in men. Hormone replacement therapy should be considered in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women; however, individualization of treatment is important to avoid adverse effects.     

Effects of dexamethasone on functional and pathological changes in rat bronchi caused by high acute exposure to chlorine

OBJECTIVE: To assess month-to-month variability of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), calculated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a), as well as factors that could influence variability, including recent acute infection in an adolescent population. METHODS: Sixty-three high school students had fasting lipids and lipoproteins measured at 4 separate times during the school year and another venipuncture 3 to 7 days after recovery from an acute infection. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was also measured. Coefficients of variation were calculated for each study variable. The influence of recent infection on variability was assessed. RESULTS: The 50th and 95th percentiles, respectively, for the coefficient of variation for each variable were as follows: total cholesterol, 7.3% and 13.6%; triglycerides, 22% and 47.3%; HDL-C, 7.9% and 16.8%; LDL-C, 12.1% and 25%; apolipoprotein A1, 6.3% and 15.2%; apolipoprotein B, 9.5% and 17.2%; and lipoprotein (a), 19.3% and 40%. Recent infection significantly lowered HDL-C (4 mg/dL; P < .0001) and apolipoprotein A1 (7 mg/dL; P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians evaluating lipids and lipoproteins serially should expect significant visit-to-visit variation in triglycerides and calculated LDL-C values. Assessment of HDL-C and apolipoprotein A1 should not be done within 2 weeks of an acute infection. Apolipoproteins B and A1 have slightly less variability than their respective lipoprotein cholesterol values (LDL-C and HDL-C).     

Secondary causes of hyperlipidemia

Secondary causes of hyperlipidemia are important to recognize. In fact, hyperlipidemia may be a clue to the presence of an underlying systemic disorder. It may greatly heighten the risk of atherosclerosis with a raised LDL-c, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein excess, and increased lipoprotein(a) as well as lowered HDL-c. The search for secondary causes may provide a clue as to why patients with primary lipid disorders suddenly develop worsening lipid profiles. The point is a crucial one because some acquired causes of hyperlipidemia, such as alcohol, estrogens, steroids, or pregnancy, when superimposed on a primary familial form of hypertriglyceridemia can result in a saturated removal system and a buildup of chylomicrons, which can lead to life-threatening pancreatitis. A convenient way to remember secondary causes is to think of the four D's of diet, drugs, disorders of metabolism, and diseases. Although diets rich in saturated fats and cholesterol are a common cause of the mild hypercholesterolemia seen in our society, alcohol excess and weight gain can explain much of the tendency toward hypertriglyceridemia. Interestingly anorexia nervosa has long been associated with severe but reversible hypercholesterolemia. Several classes of drugs need to be considered as common causes of altered lipid profiles. Glucocorticoids and estrogens elevate triglycerides and raise levels of HDL-c. Anabolic steroids taken orally markedly reduce levels of HDL-c in contrast to injectable testosterone, which does not adversely affect the LDL-to-HDL ratio. Oral contraceptives affect atherosclerotic risk depending on the kind and doses of progestin/estrogen. In those with an underlying primary hypertriglyceridemia and associated obesity, estrogenic medications can depress triglyceride removal mechanisms, leading to the chylomicronemia syndrome and pancreatitis. Antihypertensives have variable effects on lipids and lipoproteins. Although short-term thiazide usage raises cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-c, long-term usage is not necessarily associated with significant alterations in lipid levels. Alpha blockers may cause an increase in HDL-c, whereas beta blockers raise triglycerides and lower HDL-c. Sympatholytics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers are essentially lipid neutral. Retinoids can be associated with increased LDL-to-HDL ratios and occasionally striking elevations in triglycerides. Cyclosporine raises LDL-c and lipoprotein(a). Classes of drugs that may raise HDL-c include cimetidine, antiepileptic drugs, and tamoxifen, but the effect may be seen primarily in women. Hypothyroidism is the most common secondary cause of hyperlipidemia after dietary causes are considered. A thyroxine and TSH level should be obtained on all new cases of clinically important hyperlipidemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Apolipoproteins in obesity: effect of weight loss

We evaluated serum concentrations of apoprotein (APO) A1, B, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density cholesterol (HDL-C), and low density cholesterol (LDL-C) in twelve obese subjects whose body mass index (BMI) was > or = 30 before and after a clinically significant weight loss was obtained utilizing a very-low calorie diet (VLCD) consisting of liquid protein (Optifast) providing 800 calories a day. At baseline, the mean weight +/- SD was 119.77 Kg and decreased significantly to 89.29 +/- 13.46 Kg by 24 weeks. Statistically significant reductions of APO-A1, APO-B, total cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations were also observed along with the weight loss. LDL-C decreased from 156.0 +/- 55.9 mg/dL to 122.5 +/- 42.2 mg/dL (4.03 +/- 1.4 to 3.16 +/- 1.1 mmol/L), but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant change in the HDL-C and the ratios of APO-A1 to APO-B. We conclude that the use of VLCD is associated with changes in the lipid pattern that lower the cardiovascular risk profile in addition to the beneficial effects of weight loss itself.     

Recognizing infective endocarditis: case study of a 28-year-old

We studied serum lipid and lipoprotein changes before and after induction treatment in 25 acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) and in 18 acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients in order to investigate their relationship with disease activity and their prognostic relevance. ANLL at diagnosis is associated with significantly low levels of all lipid parameters, the same applies to ALL patients apart from plasma triglycerides and very-low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) which are significantly higher than in the normal population. In ANLL responders, after effective chemotherapy, a significant increase of total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B levels, without changes of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values, is observed. A further decrease of total cholesterol and LDL-C was found in nonresponders and in ANLL responders treated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), known for its cholesterol-lowering action; in fact after the completion of GM-CSF therapy, these parameters returned progressively toward normal values. In ALL responders an increase of total cholesterol, HDL-C and apolipoprotein A1 with a simultaneous decrease of triglycerides and VLDL-C is evident; no variation was found in the nonresponder group. These results suggest a close correlation between serum lipids and acute leukemia: total cholesterol and LDL-C in ANLL, and HDL-C and VLDL-C in ALL may be considered reliable markers of complete remission and may be useful in the follow-up of leukemic patients.     

Defining specific goals of therapy in treating dyslipidemia in the patient with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Because patients with low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDL-C) are at high risk for clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) events, these patients require aggressive treatment with lifestyle modifications-increased exercise, smoking cessation, and weight loss in overweight patients-and available pharmacological agents. Drugs that raise HDL-C include nicotinic acid, fibric acid derivatives, estrogens, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), alpha-blockers, and alcohol. However, all agents that increase HDL-C may not have the same clinical benefit, just as, as shown in genetic studies in humans and mice, genetic causes of high HDL-C do not always protect against CAD, nor do genetic causes of low HDL-C always increase risk for CAD. Better understanding of the complexities of HDL metabolism and the mechanisms by which HDL protects against CAD is needed to enable the development of new therapeutic strategies--novel drugs or gene delivery systems--to increase HDL-C and reduce CAD events. The statins are the agents with the greatest evidence for slowing progression of CAD and reducing clinical events in patients with low HDL-C, but additional research is needed to determine the potential benefits of additional interventions that increase HDL-C, including combination therapy, which may provide greater improvements in the entire lipid profile.     

Effects of raloxifene on serum lipids and coagulation factors in healthy postmenopausal women

CONTEXT: Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that has estrogen-agonistic effects on bone and estrogen-antagonistic effects on breast and uterus. OBJECTIVE: To identify the effects of raloxifene on markers of cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women, and to compare them with those induced by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, parallel trial. SETTING: Eight sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 390 healthy postmenopausal women recruited by advertisement. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 treatments: raloxifene, 60 mg/d; raloxifene, 120 mg/d; HRT (conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, and medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d); or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change and percent change from baseline of lipid levels and coagulation parameters after 3 months and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: At the last visit completed, compared with placebo, both dosages of raloxifene significantly lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 12% (P < .001), similar to the 14% reduction with HRT (P < .001). Both dosages of raloxifene significantly lowered lipoprotein(a) by 7% to 8% (P < .001), less than the 19% decrease with HRT (P<.001). Raloxifene increased high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol (HDL2-C) by 15% to 17% (P < .05), less than the 33% increase with HRT (P < .001). Raloxifene did not significantly change high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1); whereas HRT increased HDL-C by 11% and triglycerides by 20%, and decreased PAI-1 by 29% (for all, P < .001). Raloxifene significantly lowered fibrinogen by 12% to 14% (P < .001), unlike HRT, which had no effect. Neither treatment changed fibrinopeptide A or prothrombin fragment 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene favorably alters biochemical markers of cardiovascular risk by decreasing LDL-C, fibrinogen, and lipoprotein(a), and by increasing HDL2-C without raising triglycerides. In contrast to HRT, raloxifene had no effect on HDL-C and PAI-1, and a lesser effect on HDL2-C and lipoprotein(a). Further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether these favorable biochemical effects are associated with protection against cardiovascular disease.     

Biological variability in serum vitamin E concentrations: relation to serum lipids

The components of biological variation in serum vitamin E in relation to serum cholesterol, triglycerides, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, LDL-C), apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I), and apo B were examined in 26 healthy volunteers who had monthly blood samplings during one calendar year. The estimated CVs for vitamin E were: interindividual, 19.9%, and intraindividual, 11.9%; the index of individuality (I-index) was 0.59. The I-indices for all lipid variables were < 0.51. Serum concentrations of vitamin E, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, and apo B were lower in spring than in the other seasons. The peak-trough differences in the yearly variations, expressed as a percentage of the mean, were for vitamin E 14.5%, cholesterol 16.2%, triglycerides 14.5%, and LDL-C 24.3%. A significant common annual rhythm was expressed in vitamin E or lipid variables and in the changes in ambient temperature the weeks before blood sampling (inverse relations). There were highly significant positive time relations between serum vitamin E and cholesterol, triglycerides, and apo B. Subjects with higher homeostatic setpoints of cholesterol showed higher homeostatic setpoints of vitamin E, triglycerides, LDL-C, and apo B.     

Effects of antihypertensive drugs on coronary artery disease risk: a meta-analysis

1. The effects of antihypertensive drugs on lipids may also influence their effect on coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the clinical significance of these effects and the extent to which they persist during long-term therapy is uncertain. 2. We performed a meta-analysis on 23 randomized trials published between 1988 and 1994 that compared the effects of atenolol, celiprolol (a beta-blocker with beta 2-adrenoceptor intrinsic sympathomimetic activity), enalapril, nifedipine and doxazosin on plasma cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides and blood pressure (BP). 3. Predicted changes in CAD risk were calculated by incorporating the results for these parameters into the Framingham equations. 4. While there were no differences in antihypertensive efficacy between the drugs, atenolol significantly (P < 0.05) reduced HDL-C and increased total cholesterol, LDL-C and triglycerides compared with celiprolol, enalapril, doxazosin and nifedipine. 5. The magnitude of the effects on lipids was not significantly influenced by the duration of therapy (up to 3 years for atenolol and doxazosin and up to 2 years for celiprolol). 6. The improvement in Framingham equation point scores (systolic BP formula) was significantly (P < 0.05) less for atenolol (-0.54; confidence intervals (CI) -0.29-(-0.78)) than for celiprolol (-1.69; CI -0.68-2.70), doxazosin (-1.67; CI -1.11-(-2.23)), enalapril (-1.43; CI 0.23-(-3.07)) and nifedipine (-1.91; CI -1.22-(-2.59)). Similar results were obtained for the Framingham diastolic BP formula. 7. These results suggest that the adverse effects of atenolol ]on plasma lipids do not improve with prolonged therapy and are theoretically great enough to reduce its efficacy in reducing CAD by approximately two thirds compared with antihypertensive drugs that do not adversely affect plasma lipids. However it must be emphasized that these are theoretical effects. In order to determine the actual differences between these drugs on CAD end points, studies using these end points are required.     

Estrogen-androgen for hormone replacement. A review

OBJECTIVE: To critically examine the role of androgens as part of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Examination of original reports and reviews obtained by electronic database searches and supplemented by manual search of bibliographies. RESULTS: As compared to estrogens alone, estrogen-androgen therapy may better protect against osteoporosis and increase libido, energy levels and general sense of well-being. However, estrogen-androgen replacement also reduces the beneficial increases in high-density lipoprotein induced by estrogens alone, although this effect may be offset at least partially by decreases in atherogenic triglycerides. The long-term net effect of estrogen-androgen replacement on cardiovascular disease remains unknown. CONCLUSION: Although the literature includes relatively few clinical trials or well-controlled studies and is further limited by the subjective nature of outcomes, such as sexual and psychological function, the available data suggest that for many postmenopausal women, estrogen-androgen replacement may provide benefits beyond those provided by estrogen-only replacement therapy.     

Effects of physical activity on lipids and coagulation

In order to evaluate the effects of physical activity on seric lipoproteins and coagulation parameters, an 8-week clinical trial was performed. Fifteen healthy young subjects (average age 23 years) with no history of previous agonistic physical activity, entered the study. Each subject underwent a physical programme consisting of three times a week bicycle ergometer exercise with progressive increases in work rate by using stages of 3 min duration until the 85% of the predictive heart rate was reached. Each individual was subjected to four blood drawings according to the following schedule: at the beginning of the study, after 4 weeks, after 8 weeks (at the end of the programme) and 4 weeks after the interruption of training. As far as the seric lipoproteins are concerned, the following parameters were monitored: total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, triglycerides, Apo-A1, Apo-B100, NEFA and phospholipids. On the other hand the following coagulation parameters were monitored: fibrinogen PT, aPtt, coagulation factors (II-XII), red cells, leucocytes, platelets, hemoglobin and hematocrit. From the analysis of the data, the following statistically significant results were observed: HDL-C increased by 14%, LDL-C decreased by 13%, Apo-A1 increased by 6%, fibrinogen increased by 31.7%, Ptt decreased by 3.7% and leucocytes increased by 15%. Four weeks after exercise was terminated, all monitored parameters turned into the basal range. Our data seem to demonstrate a positive effect of physical exercise on seric lipoproteins in the short period. Nevertheless they provide evidence of an hypercoagulability condition demonstrated by the important fibrinogen increase and the Ptt decrease.     

Comparison of 2 homogeneous high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays

BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is an independent inverse risk factor for coronary artery disease. Current methodologies for measurement of HDL-C in most clinical laboratories involve chemical precipitation-based methods. However, these methods are time-consuming, affected by high triglycerides, are not suitable for complete automation, and require a large sample size. New direct homogeneous methods are now available that do not have these constraints. DESIGN: We evaluated the performance of 2 direct homogeneous methods, Liquid N-geneous HDL-C assay (LN-HDL) and Boehringer Mannheim HDL Cholesterol assay (BM-HDL), and compared these methods against a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reference method (MR-HDL) in 126 patients with normotriglyceridemia (triglycerides < 4.5 mmol/L, range 0.6-4.3 mmol/ L) and 50 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides > or =4.5 mmol/L, range 4.5-18.8 mmol/L). RESULTS: Excellent precision profiles were exhibited by both homogeneous methods. Both LN-HDL and BM-HDL correlated well with MR-HDL in normotriglyceridemia (r = 0.98, slope = 0.93 and r = 0.97, slope = 1.0, respectively). However, compared with the modified reference method, the LN-HDL correlated better than the BM-HDL in hypertriglyceridemic samples (r = 0.97, slope = 1.0 and r = 0.91, slope = 0.9, respectively). The 1998 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for accuracy (bias < +/-5%) were met by LN-HDL in both normotriglyceridemic and hypertriglyceridemic samples (bias = 1.3% and 3.3%, respectively); however, BM-HDL failed to meet the National Cholesterol Education Program accuracy criteria in both triglyceride subgroups (bias = 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively). In addition, the total error for LN-HDL in both normotriglyceridemia (6.6%) and hypertriglyceridemia (8.6%) was well within the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for total error (< or =13%); BM-HDL exhibited a higher total error than LN-HDL in normotriglyceridemia (11.9%) and failed to meet the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines in hypertriglyceridemia (15.0%). CONCLUSION: Although both homogeneous methods are precise, the LN-HDL assay is superior in accuracy to the BM-HDL assay when compared with the modified reference method.     

Vitamin E modifies neither fructosamine nor HbA1c levels in poorly controlled diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of vitamin E on total serum protein glycation (fructosamine), hemoglobin glycation (HbA1c), and serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, apolipoprotein A1 and apolipoprotein B. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty poorly controlled diabetic patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1200 mg/day of vitamin E or identical placebo capsules during a two month period following a double blind cross-over design with a four week wash-out period between regimens. RESULTS: Seven patients were excluded from the study because of reasons not related to the medication. In the remaining 53 patients, the levels of serum glucose, fructosamine, HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, Apo A1 and Apo B did not vary significantly with vitamin E as compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: No significant effects of vitamin E on any of the parameters evaluated were observed in poorly controlled diabetic patients.     

Influence of low HDL on progression of coronary artery disease and response to fluvastatin therapy

BACKGROUND--Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) commonly have low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and mildly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), leading to uncertainty as to whether the appropriate goal of therapy should be lowering LDL-C or raising HDL-C. METHODS AND RESULTS--Patients in the Lipoprotein and Coronary Atherosclerosis Study (LCAS) had mildly to moderately elevated LDL-C; many also had low HDL-C, providing an opportunity to compare angiographic progression and the benefits of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in patients with low versus patients with higher HDL-C. Of the 339 patients with biochemical and angiographic data, 68 had baseline HDL-C <0.91 mmol/L (35 mg/dL), mean 0.82+/-0.06 mmol/L (31. 7+/-2.2 mg/dL), versus 1.23+/-0.29 mmol/L (47.4+/-11.2 mg/dL) in patients with baseline HDL-C >/=0.91 mmol/L. Among patients on placebo, those with low HDL-C had significantly more angiographic progression than those with higher HDL-C. Fluvastatin significantly reduced progression among low-HDL-C patients: 0.065+/-0.036 mm versus 0.274+/-0.045 mm in placebo patients (P=0.0004); respective minimum lumen diameter decreases among higher-HDL-C patients were 0. 036+/-0.021 mm and 0.083+/-0.019 mm (P=0.09). The treatment effect of fluvastatin on minimum lumen diameter change was significantly greater among low-HDL-C patients than among higher-HDL-C patients (P=0.01); among low-HDL-C patients, fluvastatin patients had improved event-free survival compared with placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS--Although the predominant lipid-modifying effect of fluvastatin is to decrease LDL-C, patients with low HDL-C received the greatest angiographic and clinical benefit.     

Effects of fluvastatin, a new inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, and niceritrol on serum lipids, lipoproteins and cholesterol ester transfer activity in primary hypercholesterolemic patients

Effects of a combination therapy of fluvastatin, a new inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, and niceritrol on lipid metabolism were investigated measuring a wide range of parameters in 42 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. After a wash-out period patients were randomly allocated to 1 of the 2 groups, the fluvastatin-preceding group (G-1) and the niceritrol-preceding group (G-2). In G-1 fluvastatin monotherapy (30 mg/day) significantly decreased total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C). There was no significant change in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). Further effect in HDL-C and TG was observed after the addition of niceritrol (750 mg/day). On the other hand, in G-2, while niceritrol alone (750 mg/day) produced no significant change in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG and Lp(a), the addition of fluvastatin (30 mg/day) reduced TC and LDL-C levels significantly. Cholesterol ester transfer (CET) activity was significantly reduced by niceritrol monotherapy. After the concomitant use of the 2 drugs CET activity was significantly reduced only in G-2. No significant change in lipoprotein lipase and hepatic triglyceride lipase activities were observed in the 2 groups at either point in time. No serious adverse effect was observed in this study. It is concluded that fluvastatin is an effective drug for lowering LDL-cholesterol and causes no adverse alteration in lipid metabolism. Combination with niceritrol at a dose of 750 mg/day dose not appear to augment or attenuate beneficial effects of fluvastatin.