Influence of polymerization conditions on the structure and properties of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloy synthesized in the gas phase with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of in‐reactor polyethylene/polypropylene alloys by polyethylene homopolymerization and subsequent homopolymerization of propylene in the gas phase. Different conditions in the ethylene homopolymerization stage, such as monomer pressure and polymerization temperature, were investigated, and their influences on the structure and properties of in‐reactor alloys were studied. Raising the polymerization temperature is the most effective way of speeding up polymerization and regulating the ethylene content of polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) alloys, but it will cause a greater increase in the PE‐b‐PP block copolymer fraction (named fraction D) than in the fraction of PP‐block‐PE in which the PP segments have low or medium isotacticity (named fraction A). Although changing ethylene monomer pressure could influence the ethylene content of PE/PP alloys slightly, it is an effective way of regulating the structural distribution. Reducing the monomer pressure will evidently increase fractions A and D. The mechanical properties of the alloys, including impact strength and flexural modulus, can be regulated in a broad range with changes in polymerization conditions. These properties are highly dependent on the amount, distribution, and chain structure of fractions A and D. The impact strength is affected by both fraction A and fraction D in a complicated way, whereas the flexural modulus is mainly determined by the amount of fraction A. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 2136–2143, 2006     

Structure and morphology of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloys synthesized by spherical high‐yield Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A series of spherical polyethylene/polypropylene (PE/PP) in‐reactor alloys were synthesized with spherical high‐yield Ziegler–Natta catalyst by sequential multistage polymerization in slurry. The morphology of PE/PP alloy granule was evaluated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show PE/PP in‐reactor alloy with excellent morphology, high porosity, and narrow distribution of the particle size. The PE/PP in‐reactor alloys show excellent mechanical properties with good balance between toughness and rigidity. It was fractionated into five fractions by temperature‐gradient extraction fractionation, and every fractionation was analyzed by FTIR, ¹³C‐NMR, DSC, and WAXD. The PE/PP in‐reactor alloy was found to contain mainly five portions: PP, PE, segmented copolymer with PP and PE segment of different length, ethylene‐b‐propylene copolymer, and an ethylene–propylene random copolymer. The characteristic chain structure leads to good compatibility between the fractions of the alloy that shows a multiphase structure. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 2075–2085, 2007     

Chain structure of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloy synthesized in gas phase with spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst

Two polyethylene/polypropylene (PE/PP) in‐reactor alloy samples were synthesized by multi‐stage gas‐phase polymerization using a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst. The alloys show excellent toughness and stiffness. FTIR, ¹³C‐NMR and thermal analysis proved that the alloys are mainly composed of polyethylene, PE‐block‐PP copolymer and polypropylene. There are also a few percent of ethylene‐propylene segmented copolymer with very low crystallinity. The block copolymer fraction accounts for more than 25 % of the alloy. The role of the block copolymer as compatibilizer between PE and PP is believed to be the key factor that results in the excellent toughness–stiffness balance of the material. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Influence of cocatalyst on the structure and properties of polypropylene/poly (ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys prepared by MgCl2/TiCl4/diester type Ziegler‐Natta catalyst

In this work, a series of polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (iPP/EPR) in‐reactor alloys were prepared by MgCl₂/TiCl₄/diester type Ziegler‐Natta catalyst with triethylaluminium/triisobutylaluminium (TEA/TIBA) mixture as cocatalyst. The influence of cocatalyst and external electron donor, e.g., diphenyldimethoxysilane (DDS) or dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (D ‐donor), on the structure and mechanical properties of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloys were studied and discussed. According to the characterization results, PP/EPR was mainly composed of random poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), segmented poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), and high isotactic PP. Using TEA/TIBA mixture as cocatalyst and DDS as external electron donor, as TEA/TIBA ratio increased, the impact strength of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloys had an increasing trend. Using TEA/TIBA mixture as cocatalyst and D ‐donor as external electron donor, the impact strength of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloy were dramatically improved. In this case, the iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloy prepared at TEA: TIBA = 4 : 1 was the toughest. The influence of cocatalyst and external electron donor on the flexural modulus and flexural strength could be ignored. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Preparation and characterization of high MFR polypropylene and polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys

In this work, high melt flow rate (MFR) polypropylene (HF‐PP) and polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys (HF‐PP/EPR) with MFR ≈ 30 g/10 min were synthesized by spherical MgCl₂‐supported Ziegler–Natta catalyst with cyclohexylmethyldimethoxysilane (CHMDMS) or dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (DCPDMS) as external donor (De). The effects of De on polymerization activity, chain structure, mechanical properties, and phase morphology of HF‐PP and HF‐PP/EPR were studied. Adding CHMDMS caused more sensitive change of the polymers MFR with H₂ than DCPDMS, and produced PP/EPR alloys containing more random ethylene‐propylene copolymer (r‐EP) and segmented ethylene‐propylene copolymer (s‐EP). CHMDMS also caused formation of s‐EP with higher level of blockiness than DCPDMS. HF‐PP/EPR alloy prepared in the presence of DCPDMS exhibited higher flexural properties but lower impact strength than that prepared with CHMDMS. Toughening efficiency of the rubber phase was nearly the same in the alloys prepared using CHMDMS or DCPDMS as De, but stiffness of the alloy can be improved by using DCPDMS. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42984.     

The functions of crystallizable ethylene‐propylene copolymers in the formation of multiple phase morphology of high impact polypropylene

The functions of crystallizable ethylene‐propylene copolymers in the formation of multiple phase morphology of high impact polypropylene (hiPP) were studied by solvent extraction fractionation, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C‐NMR), and selected reblending of different fractions of hiPP. The results indicate that hiPP contains, in addition to polypropylene (PP) and amorphous ethylene‐propylene random copolymer (EPR) as well as a small amount of polyethylene (PE), a series of crystallizable ethylene‐propylene copolymers. The crystallizable ethylene‐propylene copolymers can be further divided into ethylene‐propylene segmented copolymer (PE‐s‐PP) with a short sequence length of PE and PP segments, and ethylene‐propylene block copolymer (PE‐b‐PP) with a long sequence length of PE and PP blocks. PE‐s‐PP and PE‐b‐PP participate differently in the formation of multilayered core‐shell structure of the dispersed phase in hiPP. PE‐s‐PP (like PE) constructs inner core, PE‐b‐PP forms outer shell, while intermediate layer is resulted from EPR. The main reason of the different functions of the crystallizable ethylene‐propylene copolymers is due to their different compatibility with the PP matrix. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Chain structure and mechanical properties of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene)in‐reactor alloys synthesized with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst by gas‐phase polymerization

Two polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloy samples with a good polymer particle morphology were synthesized by sequential multistage gas‐phase polymerization with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst. The alloys showed excellent mechanical properties, including both toughness and stiffness. With temperature‐gradient extraction fractionation, both alloys were fractionated into five fractions. The chain structures of the fractions were studied with Fourier transform infrared, ¹³C‐NMR, and thermal analysis. The alloys were mainly composed of polyethylene, polyethylene‐b‐polypropylene block copolymer, and polypropylene. There also were minor amounts of an ethylene–propylene segmented copolymer with very low crystallinity and an ethylene–propylene random copolymer. The block copolymer fraction accounted for more than 44 wt % of the alloys. The coexistence of these components with different structures was apparently the key factor resulting in the excellent toughness–stiffness balance of the materials. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 640–647, 2005     

New synthesis methods for polypropylene‐co‐ethylene‐propylene rubber

In this research, the reinforcement of polypropylene (PP) was studied using a new method that is more practical for synthesizing polypropylene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐propylene) copolymer (PP‐co‐EP), which can be used as a rubber toughening agent. This copolymer (PP‐co‐EP) could be synthesized by varying the feed condition and changing the feed gas in the batch reactor system using Ziegler–Natta catalysts system at a copolymerization temperature of 10°C. The ¹³C‐NMR tested by a 21.61‐ppm resonance peak indicated the incorporation of ethylene to propylene chains that could build up the microstructure of the block copolymer chain. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) results also confirmed these conclusions. Under these conditions, the morphology of copolymer trapped in PP matrix could be observed and the copolymer T_g would decrease when the amount of PP‐co‐EP was increased. DMA study also showed that PP‐co‐EP is good for the polypropylene reinforcement at low temperature. Moreover, the PP‐co‐EP content has an effect on the crystallinity and morphology of polymer blend, i.e., the crystallinity of polymer decreased when the PP‐co‐EP content increased, but tougher mechanical properties at low temperature were observed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3609–3616, 2007     

Effect of the structure on the morphology and spherulitic growth kinetics of polyolefin in‐reactor alloys

Four polyolefin in‐reactor alloys with different compositions and structures were prepared by sequential polymerization. All the alloys were fractionated into five fractions: a random copolymer of ethylene and propylene (25°C fraction), an ethylene–propylene segmented copolymer (90°C fraction), an ethylene homopolymer (110°C fraction), an ethylene–propylene block copolymer (120°C fraction), and a propylene homopolymer plus a minor ethylene homopolymer of high molecular weight (>120°C fraction). The effect of the structure on the morphology and spherulitic growth kinetics of the polypropylene (PP) component in the alloys was investigated. The polyolefin alloys containing a suitable block copolymer fraction and a larger amount of PP had a more homogeneous morphology, and the crystalline particles were smaller. Quenching the polyolefin alloys led to smaller crystallites and a more homogeneous morphology as well. Isothermal crystallization was carried out above the melting temperature of polyethylene, and the growth of PP spherulites was monitored with polarized optical microscopy with a hot stage. The alloys with higher propylene contents exhibited a faster spherulitic growth rate. The fold surface free energy was derived, and it was found that a large amount of block copolymer fractions and random copolymer fractions could reduce the fold surface free energy. The structure of the alloys also affected the crystallization regime of PP. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 632–638, 2005     

Structural characterization of reactor blends of polypropylene and ethylene‐propylene rubber

Blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐propylene rubber copolymer (EPR), and ethylene‐propylene crystalline copolymer (EPC) can be produced through in situ polymerization processes directly in the reactor and blends with different structure and composition can be obtained. In this work we studied the structure of five reactor‐made blends of PP, EPR, and EPC produced by a Ziegler‐Natta catalyst system. The composition of EPR was related to the ratio between ethylene and propylene used in the copolymerization step. The ethylene content in the EPR was in the range of 50–70 mol %. The crystallization behavior of PP and EPC in the blends was influenced by the presence of the rubber, and some specific interactions between the components could be established. By preparative temperature rising elution fractionation (P‐TREF) analysis, the isolation and characterization of crystalline EPC fractions were made. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2155–2162, 2004     

Study of crystallization and melting behavior of polypropylene‐block‐polyethylenes copolymers fractionated from polypropylene and polyethylene mixtures

A series of ethylene–propylene block copolymer fractions of differing compositions, while still retaining broad molecular weight distributions, were obtained by fractionation of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) copolymers prepared by sequential polymerization of ethylene and propylene. The crystallization and melting behavior of the polypropylene‐block‐polyethylene fractions were studied. It was observed that the major component could suppress crystallization of the minor component, leading to a decrease in crystallinity and melting temperature. Non‐isothermal crystallization showed that crystallization of the ethylene block was less influenced by composition and cooling rate than the propylene block. At fast cooling rates, the ethylene block could crystallize prior to the propylene block. Isothermal crystallization kinetics experiments were also conducted. We found that the block copolymers with minor ethylene components had smaller Avrami exponents (n ≈ 1.0), hence indicating a reduced growth dimension of the PE crystals by the pre‐existing PP crystals. On the other hand, the ethylene block exhibited much larger Avrami exponents in those block copolymers with major ethylene contents. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

The architecture of hydroxy‐functionalized aPS‐b‐random copolymer‐b‐PE via one‐pot strategy combining living free radical polymerization with coordination polymerization

The copolymerization of styrene with ethylene was promoted by CpTiCl₃/BDGE/Zn/MAO catalyst system combining free radical polymerization with coordination polymerization via sequential monomer addition strategy in one‐pot. The effect of polymerization conditions such as temperature, time, ethylene pressure, and Al/Ti molar ratio on the polymerization performance was investigated. The hydroxy‐functionalized aPS‐b‐random copolymer‐b‐PE triblock copolymer was obtained by solvent extraction and determined by GPC, DSC, WAXD, and ¹³C‐NMR. The DSC result indicated that the aPS‐b‐random copolymer‐b‐PE had a T_g at 87°C and a T_m at 119°C which attributed to the T_g of aPS segment and the T_m of PE segment, respectively. The microstructure of the hydroxy‐functionalized aPS‐b‐random copolymer‐b‐PE was further confirmed by WAXD, ¹³C‐NMR, and ¹H‐NMR analysis; and these results demonstrated that the obtained block copolymer consisted of aPS segment, S‐E random copolymer segment, and crystalline PE segment. The connection polymerization of the hydroxy‐functionalized aPS with random copolymer‐b‐PE was revealed by GPC results. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Influences of copolymerization conditions on the structure and properties of isotactic polypropylene/ethylene–propylene random copolymer in situ blends

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of in situ isotactic polypropylene/ethylene–propylene random copolymer blends by propylene bulk polymerization and subsequent gas‐phase copolymerization of ethylene with propylene. Different copolymerization conditions, such as the reaction time, monomer pressure, and composition, were investigated, and their influences on the structure and properties of the products were studied. Raising the monomer pressure was the most effective way of speeding up the copolymerization, but it caused more increases in the random copolymer than the block copolymer fractions. Increasing the ethylene content of the monomer feed also resulted in higher reaction rates and copolymer contents, but the ethylene contents of both the random and block copolymer fractions were also raised. In situ blends that contain more than 50 wt % copolymer were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends, including the impact strength and flexural modulus, were regulated in a rather broad range with changes in the copolymerization conditions. The properties were highly dependent on the amount, distribution, and chain structure of the copolymer fractions. The impact strength was influenced by both the random copolymer and block copolymer portions in a complicated way, whereas the flexural modulus was mainly determined by the amount of random copolymer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 445–453, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10415     

The investigation of novel non‐metallocene catalysts with phenoxy‐imine ligands for ethylene (co‐)polymerization

Phthaldialdehyde and phthaldiketone were treated with substituted phenols of 2‐amino‐4‐methylphenol, 2‐amino‐5‐methylphenol and 2‐amino‐4‐t‐butylphenol, respectively, and then treated with transition metal halides of TiCl₄, ZrCl₄ and YCl₃. A series of novel non‐metallocene catalysts (1–12) with phenoxy‐imine ligands was obtained. The structures and properties of the catalysts were characterized by ¹H NMR and elemental analysis. The catalysts (1–12) were used to promote ethylene (co‐)polymerization after activation by methylaluminoxane. The effects of the structures and center atoms (Ti, Zr and Y) of these catalysts, polymerization temperature, Al/M (M = Ti, Zr and Y) molar ratio, concentration of the catalysts and solvents on the polymerization performance were investigated. The results showed that the catalysts were favorable for ethylene homopolymerization and copolymerization of ethylene with 1‐hexene. Catalyst 10 is most favorable for catalyzing ethylene homopolymerization and copolymerization of ethylene with 1‐hexene, with catalytic activity up to 2.93 × 10⁶ gPE (mol Y)^?1 h^?1 for polyethylene (PE) and 2.96 × 10⁶ gPE (mol Y)^?1 h^?1 for copolymerization of ethylene with 1‐hexene under the following conditions: polymerization temperature 50 °C, Al/Y molar ratio 300, concentration of catalyst 1.0 × 10^?4 L^?1 and toluene as solvent. The structures and properties of the polymers obtained were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ¹³C NMR, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, gel permeation chromatography and DSC. The results indicated that the obtained PE catalyzed by 4 had the highest melting point of 134.8 °C and the highest weight‐average molecular weight of 7.48 × 10⁵ g mol^?1. The copolymer catalyzed by 4 had the highest incorporation of 1‐hexene, up to 5.26 mol%, into the copolymer chain. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Multilayered core–shell structure of the dispersed phase in high‐impact polypropylene

The multiphase morphology of high impact polypropylene (hiPP), which is a reactor blend of polypropylene (PP) with ethylene–propylene copolymer, was investigated by transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and field‐emission scanning electron microscopy techniques in conjunction with an analysis of the hiPP composition and chain structure based on solvent fractionation, ¹³C‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry measurements. A multilayered core–shell structure of the dispersed phase of hiPP in solution‐cast films and the bulk was observed. The inner core was mainly composed of polyethylene (including its long blocks) together with part of PP, the intermediate layer was ethylene–propylene random copolymer, and the outer shell consisted of ethylene–propylene multiblock copolymers. The formation process and controlling factors of the multilayered core–shell structure are discussed. This kind of multiphase morphology of hiPP caused the material to possess both a high rigidity and high toughness. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Structure and properties of polypropylene alloy in situ blends

A series of polypropylene (PP) alloys containing different ethylene contents have been prepared by the in situ sequential polymerization technique, using Ziegler–Natta catalyst (MgCl₂/TiCl₄/BMF; BMF is 9,9‐bis(methoxymethyl)fluorine, as an internal donor) without any external donor. The structure and properties of PP alloys obtained have been investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results have suggested that PP alloys are the complex mixtures containing PP, the copolymer with long sequence ethylene chain, ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR), and block copolymer etc. In the alloys, PP, EPR, and the copolymer with long sequence ethylene chain are partially compatible. The investigation of the mechanical properties indicates that notched Izod impact strength of PP alloy greatly increases at 16°C/?20°C in comparison with that of pure PP. The noticeable plastic deformation is observed in SEM photograph. The increase in the toughness, the mechanical strength of PP alloy decreases to a certain extent. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4804–4810, 2006     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/ poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

Blending polypropylene (PP) with biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) can be a nice alternative to minimize the disposal problem of PP and the intrinsic brittleness that restricts PHB applications. However, to achieve acceptable engineering properties, the blend needs to be compatibilized because of the immiscibility between PP and PHB. In this work, PP/PHB blends were prepared with different types of copolymers as possible compatibilizers: poly(propylene‐g‐maleic anhydride) (PP–MAH), poly (ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate) [P(E–MA)], poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–GMA)], and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–MA–GMA)]. The effect of each copolymer on the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results show that the compatibilizers efficiency decreased in this order: P(E–MA–GMA) > P(E–MA) > P(E–GMA) > PP–MAH; we explained this by taking into consideration the affinity degree of the compatibilizers with the PP matrix, the compatibilizers properties, and their ability to provide physical and/or reactive compatibilization with PHB. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

In situ synthesis of polybutene‐1/polypropylene spherical alloys within a reactor with an MgCl2‐supported Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A series of isotactic polybutene‐1/polypropylene (PB/PP) alloys with spherical morphology were prepared by MgCl₂‐supported Ziegler‐Natta catalyst with sequential two‐stage polymerization technology. The first formed PP particles were used as micro‐reactors to initiate the bulk precipitation polymerization of butene‐1 further. The porous PP particles as a hard framework may prevent the adhesion of PB particles during the bulk precipitation polymerization process. At the same time, the bulk precipitation polymerization process allows for maximization of the butene‐1 polymerization rate and simplifies the butene‐1 polymerization process considerably. Finally, spherical PB alloys with a super‐high molecular weight PB component and adjustable PP component were synthesized in situ within the reactor. The structures and properties of the PB/PP alloys were characterized by gel permeation chromatography, ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform IR, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and X‐ray diffraction. The results showed that the MgCl₂‐supported Ziegler‐Natta catalyst showed relatively high stereospecificity and efficiency for both propylene and butene‐1 polymerization. The incorporation of propylene on the PB matrix affects the properties of the final products markedly. The PB/PP alloys are expected to have a broader range of applications as a new family of high performance materials. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Study of propylene‐1‐butene‐ethylene terpolymer and reactor blend by TREF and 13C‐NMR

A terpolymer of propylene‐1‐butene‐ethylene (TERPO) and a reactor mixture of TERPO with an ethylene‐1‐butene copolymer (BLEND) were completely characterized by TREF, ¹³C‐NMR, DSC, and GPC, from which special equations for quantitative ¹³C‐NMR were derived. TERPO was shown to be composed mainly of highly isotactic propene and similar amounts of ethylene and 1‐butene. BLEND fractions were composed of variable amounts of TERPO and a random copolymer of ethylene‐1‐butene. The blend of TERPO and copolymer acts as two independent phases, each having its own elution temperatures dependent only on its crystallizability, itself only influenced by the comonomer content. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 1880–1890, 2001     

Fabrication of polypropylene blends with excellent low‐temperature toughness and balanced toughness‐rigidity by a combination of EPR and SEEPS

To overcome serious rigidity depression of rubber‐toughened plastics and fabricate a rigidity‐toughness balanced thermoplastic, a combination of styrene‐[ethylene‐(ethylene‐propylene)]‐styrene block copolymer (SEEPS) and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) was used to toughen polypropylene. The dynamic mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behavior, and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/EPR/SEEPS blends were studied in detail. The results show that the combination of SEEPS and EPR can achieve the tremendous improvement of low‐temperature toughness without significant strength and rigidity loss. Dynamic mechanical properties and phase morphology results demonstrate that there is a good interfacial strength and increased loss of compound rubber phase comprised of EPR component and EP domain of SEEPS. Compared with PP/EPR binary blends, although neither glass transition temperature (T_g) of the rubber phase nor T_g of PP matrix in PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, the brittle‐tough transition temperature (T_bd) of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, indicating that the increased interfacial interaction between PP matrix and compound rubber phase is also an effective approach to decrease T_bd of the blends so as to improve low‐temperature toughness. The balance between rigidity and toughness of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends is ascribed to the synergistic effect of EPR and SEEPS on toughening PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45714.