The expression of fear-potentiated startle during development: Integration of learning and response systems.

Relative to freezing, fear-potentiated startle (FPS) is developmentally delayed. Rats trained on Postnatal Day (PD) 18 expressed conditioned stimulus learning on PD 19 in freezing but not in FPS, whereas rats trained on PD 24 and tested on PD 25 expressed both freezing and FPS (Experiment 1). According to a neural maturation hypothesis, this delay results from functional immaturity of pathways mediating FPS. When rats were trained on PD 18, neither delaying the FPS test, allowing FPS pathways to develop, nor administrating the "reminder" treatment, the expression of FPS was promoted (Experiments 1, 2, and 2A). PD 18 learning was expressed in FPS on PD 25 when nontarget conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus training occurred prior to the test, and this effect was modality dependent (Experiments 3 and 4). The authors conclude that engaging mechanisms of associative encoding when FPS pathways are functional is a critical condition for integrating learning and FPS response systems in development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Delayed development of fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Examined the developmental emergence of fear-potentiated startle in rats ranging in age from 16 to 75 days. In Exp 1, a pure tone served as the CS and an acoustic startle pulse served as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) for fear conditioning. Fear-potentiated startle by the tone CS was observed in rats 23 days of age and older but not in rats 16 days of age. In Exp 2, a light served as the CS. Rats 30 days of age and older showed fear-potentiated startle, whereas 23-day-old rats did not. The final experiment demonstrated that another behavioral index of fear, stimulus-elicited freezing, was observed earlier in development than fear-potentiated startle, confirming the effectiveness of the training procedure for conditioning fear. Results suggest that fear-potentiated startle is a relatively late-emerging response system, parallelling the development of conditioned autonomic changes (e.g., heart rate) rather than that of freezing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Normal conditioning inhibition and extinction of freezing and fear-potentiated startle following electrolytic lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in rats.

The authors investigated the role of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the inhibition of conditioned fear in rats using both Pavlovian extinction and conditioned inhibition paradigms. In Experiment 1, lesions of ventral mPFC did not interfere with conditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response. In Experiment 2, lesions made after acquisition of fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear to a visual conditioned stimulus (CS) and did not impair "reinstatement" of fear after unsignaled presentations of the unconditioned stimulus. In Experiment 3, lesions made before fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear-potentiated startle or freezing to an auditory CS. In both Experiments 2 and 3, extinction of fear to contextual cues was also unaffected by the lesions. These results indicate that ventral mPFC is not essential for the inhibition of fear under a variety of circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hyperexcitability: Exaggerated fear-potentiated startle produced by partial amygdala kindling.

The present study asked whether partial amygdala kindling would affect the expression of conditioned fear-potentiated startle. Rats were conditioned to be fearful of a light. They were then stimulated bilaterally in the amygdala or hippocampus on 2 consecutive days (partial kindling). Rats were tested 24 hr later for fear-potentiated startle. Amygdala-kindled rats had exaggerated fear-potentiated startle compared to sham-kindled rats. Hippocampus-kindled rats also displayed fear-potentiated startle. but no greater than that of sham-kindled rats. Partial amygdala kindling induced c-fos messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, a marker for neuronal activation, throughout the limbic and neocortices. In contrast, partial hippocampus kindling induced c-fos mRNA in the hippocampus only. The data suggest that kindled-induced hyperexcitability of the amygdala and limbic cortices produced exaggerated conditioned fear-potentiated startle. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The ontogeny of fear-potentiated startle: Effects of earlier-acquired fear memories.

Research has shown that learned fear emerges in a response-specific sequence. For example, freezing is observed at a younger age than is potentiated startle (P. Hunt & B. A. Campbell, 1997). The present study shows that the age at which a specific learned fear response emerges is influenced by the animal's early experiences. Specifically, fear potentiation of startle emerges earlier in development if the rat is given prior fear conditioning to a different stimulus. Some constraints of this "facilitation" effect are determined in follow-up experiments. This facilitation effect may provide a novel way of testing the development of the neural circuits underlying learned fear. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Peripheral and intraamygdalar administration of the dopamine D? receptor antagonist SCH 23390 blocks fear-potentiated startle but not shock reactivity or the shock sensitization of acoustic startle.

Central dopamine (DA) activity is thought to play a role in fear motivation. The aim of the present study was to assess the involvement of DA D? receptors in emotional learning. The authors report that peripheral and intraamygdalar administration of the specific D? receptor antagonist SCH 23390 blocked the acquisition of fear-potentiated startle. Analysis of shock reactivity during footshock administration revealed that the learning impairment could not be explained by a diminution in the aversive properties of the unconditioned stimulus. Additionally, systemic and intraamygdalar injection of SCH 23390 did not alter fear expression as measured with the shock sensitization of acoustic startle. The potential contribution of mesoamygdaloid DA to the acquisition and retrieval of conditioned fear responses is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Lesions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis block sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex produced by repeated stress, but not fear-potentiated startle

1. The effects of lesions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST) on the acquisition of conditioned fear were examined. In Experiment 1, BST lesions did not block acquisition of fear-potentiated startle to an explicit visual conditioned stimulus (CS) over 20 days of training. However, BST lesions blocked a gradual elevation in baseline startle also seen over the course of training. 2. The gradual increase in baseline startle was replicated in Experiment 2 without the presence of an explicit CS, using unoperated subjects. Experiment 2 showed that the elevation was due to repetitive exposure to shock, because unshocked control subjects did not show any elevation over sessions. 3. In Experiment 3, lesions of the BST did not disrupt rapid sensitization of the startle reflex by footshock, showing that different neural substrates underlie sensitization of startle by acute and chronic exposure to footshock. 4. These data indicate that the BST, despite its anatomical continuity with the amygdala, is not critically involved in the acquisition of conditioned fear to an explicit CS. Nevertheless, the BST is involved in mediating a stress-induced elevation in the startle reflex. This suggests that the BST and the CeA, which constitute part of the "extended amygdala" have complementary roles in responses to stress.     

Pharmacological and anatomical analysis of fear conditioning using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

Pharmacological and anatomical analyses of fear conditioning using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm are reviewed. This test measures conditioned fear by an increase in the amplitude of a simple reflex (the acoustic startle reflex) in the presence of a cue previously paired with a shock. This paradigm offers a number of advantages as an alternative to most animal tests of fear or anxiety because it involves no operant and is reflected by an enhancement rather than a suppression of ongoing behavior. Fear-potentiated startle is selectively decreased by drugs such as diazepam, morphine, and buspirone that reduce fear or anxiety clinically. By combining behavioral, anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological approaches, it should soon be possible to determine each neural pathway that is required for a stimulus signaling fear to alter startle behavior. Once the exact structures are delineated, it should be possible to determine the neurotransmitters that are released during a state of fear and how this chemical information is relayed along these pathways so as to affect behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle.

A good deal is now known about the neural circuitry involved in how conditioned fear can augment a simple reflex (fear-potentiated startle). This involves visual or auditory as well as shock pathways that project via the thalamus and perirhinal or insular cortex to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). The BLA projects to the central (CeA) and medial (MeA) nuclei of the amygdala, which project indirectly to a particular part of the acoustic startle pathway in the brainstem. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, as well as various intracellular cascades in the amygdala, are critical for fear learning, which is then mediated by glutamate acting in the CeA. Less predictable stimuli, such as a long-duration bright light or a fearful context, activate the BLA, which projects to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), which projects to the startle pathway much as the CeA does. The anxiogenic peptide corticotropin-releasing hormone increases startle by acting directly in the BNST. CeA-mediated behaviors may represent stimulus-specific fear, whereas BNST-mediated behaviors are more akin to anxiety. NMDA receptors are also involved in extinction of conditioned fear, and both extinction in rats and exposure-based psychotherapy in humans are facilitated by an NMDA-partial agonist called D-cycloserine. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contingency awareness and fear inhibition in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

Fear-potentiated startle is defined as an increase in the magnitude of the startle reflex in the presence of a stimulus that was previously paired with an aversive event. It has been proposed that a subject's awareness of the contingencies in the experiment may affect fear-potentiated startle. The authors adapted a conditional discrimination procedure (AX+/BX-), previously validated in animals, to a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm in 50 healthy volunteers. This paradigm allows for an assessment of fear-potentiated startle during threat conditions as well as inhibition of fear-potentiated startle during safety conditions. A response keypad was used to assess contingency awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Both aware and unaware subjects showed fear-potentiated startle. However, awareness was related to stimulus discrimination and fear inhibition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of corticosterone in trace and delay conditioned fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Emotional events often lead to particularly strong memory formation. Corticosterone, the final product of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis activation, has been suggested to play a critical role in this effect. Although a great deal of work has implicated the amygdala as a necessary structure for the effects of corticosterone, other studies have suggested a critical role for the hippocampus in determining the involvement of corticosterone. The current experiments examined this question by disrupting corticosterone synthesis with administration of metyrapone (25 or 100 mg/kg) prior to training in either dorsal hippocampus-independent delay fear conditioning or dorsal hippocampus-dependent trace fear conditioning. Metyrapone administration 2 hrs prior to training significantly attenuated corticosterone secretion during training, but these effects were transient as corticosterone levels were similar to control subjects following the test session. As hypothesized, only trace fear conditioning was impaired. This suggests that only fear conditioning tasks that are dependent on the dorsal hippocampus require HPA-axis activation in order to be learned. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Olfactory bulbectomy enhances sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex produced by acute or repeated stress.

The effects of olfactory bulbectomy on the acoustic startle reflex and shock-induced sensitization of the startle reflex were examined in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, bulbectomized animals showed a modest increase in baseline startle responding following surgery, and normal acquisition of fear-potentiated startle, but a pronounced increase in baseline startle responding during the course of conditioning relative to sham-operated controls. In Experiments 2 and 3, bulbectomized animals showed shock-induced sensitization of the startle reflex to shock intensities that did not produce sensitization in sham and unoperated controls. These data suggest that olfactory bulbectomy results in an increased vulnerability to stressors, which may be mediated by a disinhibition of the amygdala or other structures involved in mediating stress and anxiety. Thus, the olfactory bulbectomy model of depression may share some similarities with other stress-induced models of depression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

N-methyl-D-aspartate lesions of the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdaloid block fear-potentiated startle and shock sensitization of startle.

Destroyed cell bodies in the lateral and basolateral amygdaloid nuclei by local infusion of N-methyl-{d}-aspartate. Adjacent areas, such as the central amygdaloid nucleus, were largely spared. Lesions were carried out before training and testing (Exp 1) or after training but before testing (Exp 2). In both cases, the lesions completely blocked fear-potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of a light previously paired with footshock). They also blocked increased startle after a series of footshocks, provided they damaged the most anterior part of the basolateral nucleus. It is suggested that the lateral or basolateral amygdaloid nuclei (or both) relay visual information to the central amygdaloid nucleus, which is also critical for fear-potentiated startle. In addition, activation of the most anterior part of the basolateral nucleus may be critical for processing shock information during fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opposing roles of the amygdala and dorsolateral periaqueductal gray in fear-potentiated startle

The whole-body acoustic startle response is a short-latency reflex mediated by a relatively simple neural circuit in the lower brainstem and spinal cord. The amplitude of this reflex is markedly enhanced by moderate fear levels, and less effectively increased by higher fear levels. Extensive evidence indicates that the amygdala plays a key role in the potentiation of startle by moderate fear. More recent evidence suggests that the periaqueductal gray is involved in the loss of potentiated startle at higher levels of fear. The influence of both structures may be mediated by anatomical connections with the acoustic startle circuit, perhaps at the level of the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis. The present chapter reviews these data.     

Alcohol and fear-potentiated startle: The role of competing cognitive demands in the stress-reducing effects of intoxication.

Effects of alcohol and cognitive demands on reactions to threat were examined using startle response potentiation to index negative emotion. Men and women received nonalcoholic or alcoholic beverages prior to a series of trial blocks, signaled by light cues indicating that shocks might be delivered ("threat" blocks) or that none would occur ("safe" blocks). Within half of the blocks, participants intermittently viewed pleasant photographic slides. Alcohol attenuated overall startle reactivity, but robust fear potentiation (larger startle magnitudes and shorter latencies during threat versus safe blocks) did not differ by beverage condition. Decomposition of the Beverage?× &Threat?×?Slide interaction revealed significant fear potentiation in all conditions, except the one in which alcohol was combined with slides. Thus, dampening of stress response by alcohol may depend on diminished ability to process competing cognitive demands. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulus quality affects expression of the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice.

The relationship between stimulus intensity and startle response magnitude (SIRM) can assess the startle reflex and prepulse inhibition (PPI) with advantages over more commonly used methods. The current study used the SIRM relationships in mice to determine differences between white noise and pure tone (5 kHz) stimuli. Similarly to rats, the SIRM relationship showed a sigmoid pattern. The SIRM-derived reflex capacity (RMAX) and response efficacy (slope) of the white noise and pure tone stimuli in the absence of prepulses were equivalent. However, the pure tone startle response threshold (DMIN) was increased whereas the stimulus potency (1/ES??) was decreased when compared to white noise. Prepulses of both stimulus types inhibited RMAX and increased DMIN, but the white noise prepulses were more effective. Both stimulus intensity gating and motor capacity gating processes are shown to occur, dependent on prepulse intensity and stimulus onset asynchrony. Prepulse intensities greater than 10 dB below the startle threshold appear to produce PPI via stimulus intensity gating, whereas a motor capacity gating component appears at prepulse intensities near to the startle threshold. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Electrolytic lesions of the amygdala block acquisition and expression of fear-potentiated startle even with extensive training but do not prevent reacquisition.

Lesions of the amygdala have been shown to block the expression of fear-potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of a cue previously paired with shock). In the present study, bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala given after extensive training totally blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle but did not prevent reacquisition. In contrast, when the lesions were made before any training, the lesioned rats did not show potentiated startle even with extensive training. Thus, the central nucleus of the amygdala normally seems to be required for the initial acquisition and expression of potentiated startle regardless of the degree of learning. However, reacquisition of potentiated startle can occur without the central nucleus, which implies the presence of a secondary brain system that can compensate for the loss of the central nucleus of the amygdala under some circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Potentiation of the acoustic startle response by a conditioned stimulus paired with acoustic startle stimulus in rats.

The hypothesis that the standard acoustic startle habituation paradigm contains the elements of Pavlovian fear conditioning was tested. In a potentiated startle response paradigm, a startle stimulus and a light conditioned stimulus (CS) were paired. A startle stimulus then was tested alone or following the CS. Freezing behavior was measured to index conditioned fear. The startle response was potentiated on CS trials, and rats froze more in CS than in non-CS periods. In Experiment 1, response to a previously habituated, weak startle stimulus was potentiated. In Experiment 2, response to the same stimulus used as the unconditioned stimulus (US) in training was potentiated. This CS-potentiated response retarded the course of response decrements over training sessions as compared with an explicitly unpaired control group. Conditioned fear is a standard feature of this habituation paradigm, serves to potentiate the startle response, and provides an associative dimension lacking in the habituation process per se. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex by footshock.

Administration of footshock (500-ms duration, 0.2–2.4 mA) increased the amplitude of the startle reflex for a long time after its presentation. The effect occurred with a single footshock, although its magnitude and consistency across animals were greater with 5 or 10 footshocks presented 1/s. The facilitatory effect came on within 2–4 min with a 0.6-mA shock, peaking in about 10 min and then dissipating over the next 40 min. Stronger shocks also increased startle, but with a more delayed onset of facilitation (8–20 min). Footshocks increased startle in rats not previously given startle-eliciting stimuli, indicating sensitization rather than dishabituation. The facilitatory effect may not be attributable to a rapid conditioning to the experimental context, because a change in lighting conditions from shock presentation to testing did not attenuate shock sensitization. This excitatory effect of shock on startle may represent the unconditioned effect of shock that can become associated with a neutral stimulus to support classical fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Circadian modulation of the rat acoustic startle response.

The acoustic startle response (ASR) of male rats was measured during several sessions over a 24-hr period in both a light–dark cycle and a constant-dark condition. Each session consisted of 10 trials each at 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 dB white noise. The results indicate robust daily and circadian modulation of ASR amplitude that consist of an approximately 2-fold nocturnal increase at eliciting-stimuli intensities above 80 dB. Similar results were observed in female rats in constant-dark conditions. To determine whether daily changes in auditory thresholds were responsible for the observed modulation, ASR reflex modification procedures were used. These procedures were designed to measure auditory thresholds at frequencies of 10 and 40 kHz at several times of day. The results suggest a lack of significant circadian differences in auditory thresholds at these frequencies. This study demonstrates a novel role of the rat circadian system in the modulation of ASR amplitude. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)