Ni/CeO2 catalysts with high CO2 methanation activity and high CH4 selectivity at low temperatures

CO₂ methanation was performed over 10 wt%Ni/CeO₂, 10 wt%Ni/α-Al₂O₃, 10 wt%Ni/TiO₂, and 10 wt%Ni/MgO, and the effect of support materials on CO₂ conversion and CH₄ selectivity was examined. Catalysts were prepared by a wet impregnation method, and characterized by BET, XRD, H₂-TPR and CO₂-TPD. Ni/CeO₂ showed high CO₂ conversion especially at low temperatures compared to Ni/α-Al₂O₃, and the selectivity to CH₄ was very close to 1. The surface coverage by CO₂-derived species on CeO₂ surface and the partial reduction of CeO₂ surface could result in the high CO₂ conversion over Ni/CeO₂. In addition, superior CO methanation activity over Ni/CeO₂ led to the high CH₄ selectivity.     

Oxidative steam reforming of methanol over CuO/ZnO/CeO2/ZrO2/Al2O3 catalysts

The composition (CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ = 30/60/10) of a commercial catalyst G66B was used as a reference for designing CuO/ZnO/CeO₂/ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalysts for the oxidative (or combined) steam reforming of methanol (OSRM). The effects of Al₂O₃, CeO₂ and ZrO₂ on the OSRM reaction were clearly identified. CeO₂, ZrO₂ and Al₂O₃ all promoted the dispersions of CuO and ZnO in CuO/ZnO/CeO₂/ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalysts. Aluminum oxide lowered the reducibility of the catalyst, and weakened the OSRM reaction. Cerium oxide increased the reducibility of the catalyst, but weakened the reaction. Zirconium oxide improved the reducibility of the catalyst, and promoted the reaction. A lower CuO/ZnO ratio of the catalyst was associated with greater promotion of ZrO₂. The critical CuO/ZnO ratio for the promotion of ZrO₂ was approximately 0.75–0.8. Introducing of ZrO₂ into CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ also improved the stability of the catalyst. Although Al₂O₃ inhibited the OSRM reaction, a certain amount of it was required to ensure the stability and the mechanical strength of the catalysts.     

Catalysts for H2 production using the ethanol steam reforming (a review)

This review aims to provide an overview of the main catalytic studies of H₂ production by ethanol steam reforming (ESR). The reaction is endothermic and produces H₂, CO₂, CH₄, CO and coke. The conversion and H₂ selectivity of these products depended greatly of the physicochemical properties of the catalysts, active metal, promoters, temperature, long-term reaction, water/ethanol ratio, space velocity, contact time, and presence of O₂. Initial total conversion has been reported in all catalysts evaluated between 300 and 850 °C. The noble catalysts with high selectivity to H₂ (more than 80%) were: Rh, Ru, Pd and Ir and non-noble metal catalysts were: Ni, Co and Cu. The support materials include CeO₂, ZnO, MgO, Al₂O₃, zeolites-Y, TiO₂, SiO₂, La₂O₂CO₃, CeO₂–ZrO₂ and hydrotalcites. The impregnation method produced the best noble metal catalysts in terms of selectivity and conversion. The decrease of coke was related with the presence of basic sites on the support.     

Aqueous-phase reforming of n-BuOH over Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/CeO2 catalysts

The aqueous-phase reforming (APR) of n-butanol (n-BuOH) over Ni(20 wt%) loaded Al₂O₃ and CeO₂ catalysts has been studied in this paper. Over 100 h of run time, the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst showed significant deactivation compared to the Ni/CeO₂ catalyst, both in terms of production rates and the selectivity to H₂ and CO₂. The Ni/CeO₂ catalyst demonstrated higher selectivity for H₂ and CO₂, lower selectivity to alkanes, and a lower amount of C in the liquid phase compared to the Ni/Al₂O₃ sample. For the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst, the selectivity to CO increased with temperature, while the Ni/CeO₂ catalyst produced no CO. For the Ni/CeO₂ catalyst, the activation energies for H₂ and CO₂ production were 146 and 169 kJ mol⁻¹, while for the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst these activation energies were 158 and 175 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. The difference of the active metal dispersion on Al₂O₃ and CeO₂ supports, as measured from H₂-pulse chemisorption was not significant. This indicates deposition of carbon on the catalyst as a likely cause of lower activity of the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst. It is unlikely that carbon would build up on the Ni/CeO₂ catalyst due to higher oxygen mobility in the Ni doped non-stoichiometric CeO₂ lattice. Based on the products formed, the proposed primary reaction pathway is the dehydrogenation of n-BuOH to butaldehyde followed by decarbonylation to propane. The propane then partially breaks down to hydrogen and carbon monoxide through steam reforming, while CO converts to CO₂ mostly through water gas shift. Ethane and methane are formed via Fischer-Tropsch reactions of CO/CO₂ with H₂.     

Effect of Ce on 5 wt% Ni/ZSM-5 catalysts in the CO2 reforming of CH4 reaction

The aim of this study is to investigate the promotional effect of Ce on Ni/ZSM-5 catalysts in the CO₂ reforming of CH₄ reaction. The evaluation of the catalytic performances of the composite catalysts was conducted in a fixed-bed reactor at atmospheric pressure. The influencing factors, including temperature, Ni and Ce loadings, molar feed ratio of CO₂/CH₄, and time-on-stream (TOS), were investigated. The characteristics of the catalysts were checked with Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The reduction and the basic properties of the composite catalysts were elucidated by temperature-programmed reduction by H₂ (H₂-TPR) and temperature-programmed desorption of CO₂ (CO₂-TPD), respectively. The reactivity of deposited carbon was studied by sequential temperature-programmed surface reaction of CH₄ (CH₄-TPSR) and temperature-programmed oxidation using CO₂ and O₂ (CO₂-TPO and O₂-TPO). Results indicate that higher CH₄ conversion, H₂ selectivity, and desired H₂/CO ratio for 5 wt% Ni & 5 wt% Ce/ZSM-5 could be achieved with CO₂/CH₄ feed ratio close to unity over the temperature range of 500–900 °C. Moreover, the addition of Ce could not only promote CH₄ decomposition for H₂ production but also the gasification of deposited carbon with CO₂. The dispersion of Ni particles could be improved with Ce presence as well. A partial reduction of CeO₂ to CeAlO₃ was observed from XPS spectra over 5 wt% Ni & 5 wt% Ce/ZSM-5 after H₂ reduction and 24 h CO₂–CH₄ reforming reaction. Benefiting from the introduction of 5 wt% Ce, the calculated apparent activation energies of CH₄ and CO₂ over the temperature range of 700–900 °C could be reduced by 30% and 40%, respectively.     

CO2 methanation combined with NH3 decomposition by in situ H2 separation using a Pd membrane reactor

Combination of the reactions by means of membrane separation techniques are of interest. The CO₂ methanation was combined with NH₃ decomposition by in situ H₂ separation through a Pd membrane. The CO₂ methanation reaction in the permeate side was found to significantly enhance the H₂ removal rate of Pd membrane compared to the use of sweep gas. The reaction rate of CO₂ methanation was not influenced by H₂ supply through the Pd membrane in contrast to NH₃ decomposition in the retentate side. However, the CH₄ selectivity could be improved by using a membrane separation technique. This would be caused by the active dissociated H species which might immediately react with adsorbed CO species on the catalysts to CH₄ before those CO species desorbed. From the reactor configuration tests, the countercurrent mode showed higher H₂ removal rate in the combined reaction at 673 K compared to the cocurrent mode but the reaction rate in CO₂ methanation should be improved to maximize the perfomance of membrane reactor.     

Preferential CO oxidation on Ru/Al2O3 catalyst: An investigation by considering the simultaneously involved methanation

The CO removal with preferential CO oxidation (PROX) over an industrial 0.5% Ru/Al₂O₃ catalyst from simulated reformates was examined and evaluated through considering its simultaneously involved oxidation and methanation reactions. It was found that the CO removal was fully due to the preferential oxidation of CO until 383 K. Over this temperature, the simultaneous CO methanation was started to make a contribution, which compensated for the decrease in the removal due to the decreased selectivity of PROX at higher temperatures. This consequently kept the effluent CO content as well as the overall selectivity estimated as the ratio of the removed CO amount over the sum of the consumed O₂ and formed CH₄ amounts from apparently increasing with raising reaction temperature from 383 to 443 K when the CO₂ methanation was yet not fully started. At these temperatures the tested catalyst enabled the initial CO content of up to 1.0 vol.% to be removed to several tens of ppm at an overall selectivity of about 0.4 from simulated reformates containing 70 vol.% H₂, 30 vol.% CO₂ and with steam of up to 0.45 (volume) of dry gas. Varying space velocity in less than 9000 h⁻¹ did not much change the stated overall selectivity. From the viewpoint of CO removal the article thus concluded that the methanation activity of the tested Ru/Al₂O₃ greatly extended its working temperatures for PROX, demonstrating actually a feasible way to formulate PROX catalysts that enable broad windows of suitable working temperatures.     

Reforming of bioethanol over Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/CeZrO2/Al2O3 catalysts in supercritical water for hydrogen production

Bioethanol was reformed in supercritical water (SCW) at 500 °C and 25 MPa on Ni/Al₂O₃ and Ni/CeZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalysts to produce high-pressure hydrogen. The results were compared with non-catalytic reactions. Under supercritical water and in a non-catalytic environment, ethanol was reformed to H₂, CO₂ and CH₄ with small amounts of CO and C2 gas and liquid products. The presence of either Ni/Al₂O₃ or Ni/CeZrO₂/Al₂O₃ promoted reactions of ethanol reforming, dehydrogenation and decomposition. Acetaldehyde produced from the decomposition of ethanol was completely decomposed into CH₄ and CO, which underwent a further water-gas shift reaction in SCW. This led to great increases in ethanol conversion and H₂ yield on the catalysts of more than 3-4 times than that of the non-catalytic condition. For the catalytic operation, adding small amounts of oxygen at oxygen to ethanol molar ratio of 0.06 into the feed improved ethanol conversion, at the expense of some H₂ oxidized to water, resulting in a slightly lower H₂ yield. The ceria-zirconia promoted catalyst was more active than the unpromoted catalyst. On the promoted catalyst, complete ethanol conversion was achieved and no coke formation was found. The ceria-zirconia promoter has important roles in improving the decomposition of acetaldehyde, the enhancement of the water-gas shift as well as the methanation reactions to give an extremely low CO yield and a tremendously high H₂/CO ratio. The SCW environment for ethanol reforming caused the transformation of gamma-alumina towards the corundum phase of the alumina support in the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst, but this transformation was slowed down by the presence of the ceria-zirconia promoter.     

Hydrogen generation by sodium borohydride hydrolysis on nanosized CoB catalysts supported on TiO2, Al2O3 and CeO2

A series of nanosized CoB catalysts supported on TiO₂, Al₂O₃, and CeO₂ were prepared. The catalysts were prepared by incipient-wetness impregnation. The sample was dried at 100 °C and then dispersed in water and reduced by an aqueous solution of sodium borohydrate at room temperature. An unsupported CoB cluster was used for comparison. The activities of the supported CoB catalysts were higher than that of unsupported one. The reaction rates of these supported CoB catalysts decreased in the order: CoB/TiO₂ > CoB/Al₂O₃ > CoB/CeO₂ > unsupported CoB. The reaction kinetics on various catalysts was also investigated.     

Flowerlike microspheres catalyst NiO/La2O3 for ethanol-H2 production

Catalysts of nano-sized nickel oxide particles based on flowerlike lanthanum oxide microspheres with high disperse were prepared to achieve simultaneous dehydrogenation of ethanol and water molecules on multi-active sites. XRD, SEM, 77K N₂ adsorption were used to analyze and observe the catalysts’ structure, morphology and porosity. Catalytic parameters with respect to yield of H₂, activity, selectivity towards gaseous products and stability with time-on-stream and time-on-off-stream were all determined. This special morphology NiO/La₂O₃ catalyst represented more than 1000 h time-on-stream stability test and 500 h time-on-off-stream stability test for hydrogen fuel production from ethanol steam reforming at 300 °C without any deactivation. During the 1000 h time-on-stream stability test, ethanol–water mixtures could be converted into H₂, CO, and CH₄ with average selectivity values of 57.0, 20.1, 19.6 and little CO₂ of 3.2 mol%, respectively, and average ethanol conversion values of 96.7 mol%, with H₂ yield of 1.61 mol H₂/mol C₂H₅OH. During the 500 h time-on-off-stream stability test, ethanol–water mixtures could be converted into H₂, CO, CH₄ and CO₂ with average selectivity values of 65.1, 17.3, 15.1 and 2.5 mol%, respectively, and average ethanol conversion values of 80.0 mol%. For the ethanol-H₂ and petrolic hybrid vehicle (EH–HV), the combustion value is the most important factor. So, it was very suitable for the EH–HV application that the low temperature ethanol steam reforming products’ distribution was with high H₂, CO, CH₄ and very low CO₂ selectivity over the special NiO/La₂O₃ flowerlike microspheres.     

Comparative study of CuO supported on CeO2, Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and Ce0.8Al0.2O2 based catalysts in the CO-PROX reaction

CuO supported on CeO_2, Ce_0.8Zr_0.2O₂ and Ce_0.8Al_0.2O₂ based catalysts (6%wt Cu) were synthesized and tested in the preferential oxidation of CO in a H₂-rich stream (CO-PROX). Nanocrystalline supports, CeO₂ and solid solutions of modified CeO₂ with zirconium and aluminum were prepared by a freeze-drying method. CuO was supported by incipient wetness impregnation and calcination at 400 °C. All catalysts exhibit high activity in the CO-PROX reaction and selectivity to CO₂ at low reaction temperature, being the catalyst supported on CeO₂ the more active and stable. The influence of the presence of CO₂ and H₂O was also studied.     

Preferential oxidation of CO in H2 stream on Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts

A series of Au catalysts supported on CeO₂–TiO₂ with various CeO₂ contents were prepared. CeO₂–TiO₂ was prepared by incipient-wetness impregnation with aqueous solution of Ce(NO₃)₃ on TiO₂. Gold catalysts were prepared by deposition–precipitation method at pH 7 and 65 °C. The catalysts were characterized by XRD, TEM and XPS. The preferential oxidation of CO in hydrogen stream was carried out in a fixed bed reactor. The catalyst mainly had metallic gold species and small amount of oxidic Au species. The average gold particle size was 2.5 nm. Adding suitable amount of CeO₂ on Au/TiO₂ catalyst could enhance CO oxidation and suppress H₂ oxidation at high reaction temperature (>50 °C). Additives such as La₂O₃, Co₃O₄ and CuO were added to Au/CeO₂–TiO₂ catalyst and tested for the preferential oxidation of CO in hydrogen stream. The addition of CuO on Au/CeO₂–TiO₂ catalyst increased the CO conversion and CO selectivity effectively. Au/CuO–CeO₂–TiO₂ with molar ratio of Cu:Ce:Ti = 0.5:1:9 demonstrated very high CO conversion when the temperature was higher than 65 °C and the CO selectivity also improved substantially. Thus the additive CuO along with the promoter and amorphous oxide ceria and titania not only enhances the electronic interaction, but also stabilizes the nanosize gold particles and thereby enhancing the catalytic activity for PROX reaction to a greater extent.     

Experimental optimization analysis on operating conditions of CO removal process from hydrogen-rich reformate

The catalytic effects of CO preferential oxidation and methanation catalysts for deep CO removal under different operating conditions (temperature, space velocity, water content, etc.) are systematically studied from the aspects of CO content, CO selectivity, and hydrogen loss index. Results indicate that the 3 wt% Ru/Al₂O₃ preferential oxidation catalysts reduce CO content to below 10 ppm with a high hydrogen consumption of 11.6–15.7%. And methanation catalysts with 0.7 wt% Ru/Al₂O₃ also exhibit excellent CO removal performance at 220–240 °C without hydrogen loss. Besides, NiCl_x/CeO₂ methanation catalysts possess the characteristics of high space velocity, high activity, and high water-gas resistance, and can maintain the CO content at close to 20 ppm. Based on these experimental results, the coupling scheme of combining NiCl_x/CeO₂ methanation catalysts (low cost and high reaction space velocity) with 0.7 wt% Ru/Al₂O₃ methanation catalysts (high activity) to reduce CO content to below10 ppm is proposed.     

Effects of modifying Ni/Al2O3 catalyst with cobalt on the reforming of CH4 with CO2 and cracking of CH4 reactions

Alumina supported nickel (Ni/Al₂O₃), nickel–cobalt (Ni–Co/Al₂O₃) and cobalt (Co/Al₂O₃) catalysts containing 15% metal were synthesized, characterized and tested for the reforming of CH₄ with CO₂ and CH₄ cracking reactions. In the Ni–Co/Al₂O₃ catalysts Ni–Co alloys were detected and the surface metal sites decreased with decrease in Ni:Co ratio. Turnover frequencies of CH₄ were determined for both reactions. The initial turnover frequencies of reforming (TOF_DRM) for Ni–Co/Al₂O₃ were greater than that for Ni/Al₂O₃, which suggested a higher activity of alloy sites. The initial turnover frequencies for cracking (TOF_CRK) did not follow this trend. The highest average TOF_DRM, H₂:CO ratio and TOF_CRK were observed for a catalyst containing a Ni:Co ratio of 3:1. This catalyst also had the maximum carbon deposited during reforming and produced the maximum reactive carbon during cracking. It appeared that carbon was an intermediate product of reforming and the best catalyst was able to most effectively crack CH₄ and oxidize carbon to CO by CO₂.     

Co and Ni supported on CeO2 as selective bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane

Co/CeO₂ (Co 7.5 wt.%), Ni/CeO₂ (Ni 7.5 wt.%) and Co–Ni/CeO₂ (Co 3.75 wt.%, Ni 3.75 wt.%) catalysts were prepared by surfactant assisted co-precipitation method. Samples were characterized by X-Ray diffraction, BET surface areas measurements, temperature programmed reduction and tested for the dry reforming of methane CH₄ + CO₂ → 2CO + 2H₂ in the temperature range 600–800 °C with a CH₄:CO₂:Ar 20:20:60 vol.% feed mixture and a total flow rate of 50 cm³ min⁻¹ (GHSW = 30,000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹). The bimetallic Co–Ni/CeO₂ catalyst showed higher CH₄ conversion in comparison with monometallic systems in the whole temperature range, being 50% at 600 °C and 97% at 800 °C. H₂/CO selectivity decreased in the following order: Co–Ni/CeO₂ > Ni/CeO₂ > Co/CeO₂. Carbon deposition on spent catalysts was analyzed by thermal analysis (TG-DTA). After 20 h under stream at 750 °C, cobalt-containing catalysts, Co/CeO₂ and Co–Ni/CeO₂, showed a stable operation in presence of a deposited amorphous carbon of 6 wt.%, whereas Ni/CeO₂ showed an 8% decrease of catalytic activity due to a massive presence of amorphous and graphitic carbon (25 wt.%).     

Solid-state synthesis method for the preparation of cobalt doped Ni–Al2O3 mesoporous catalysts for CO2 methanation

In this study, a simple solid-state synthesis method was employed for the preparation of the Ni–Co–Al₂O₃ catalysts with various Co loadings, and the prepared catalysts were used in CO₂ methanation reaction. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of cobalt in nickel-based catalysts enhanced the activity of the catalyst. The results showed that the 15 wt%Ni-12.5 wt%Co–Al₂O₃ sample with a specific surface area of 129.96 m²/g possessed the highest catalytic performance in CO₂ methanation (76.2% CO₂ conversion and 96.39% CH₄ selectivity at 400 °C) and this catalyst presented high stability over 10 h time-on-stream. Also, CO methanation was investigated and the results showed a complete CO conversion at 300 °C.     

Nickel on a macro-mesoporous Al2O3@ZrO2 core/shell nanocomposite as a novel catalyst for CO methanation

A novel nickel catalyst supported on Al₂O₃@ZrO₂ core/shell nanocomposites was prepared by the impregnation method. The core/shell nanocomposites were synthesized by depositing zirconium species on boehmite nanofibres. This contribution aims to study the effects of the pore structure of supports and the zirconia dispersed on the surface of the alumina nanofibres on the CO methanation. The catalysts and supports were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), H₂ temperature-programmed reduction (H₂-TPR), nitrogen adsorption–desorption, and thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA). The catalytic performance of the catalysts for CO methanation was investigated at a temperature range from 300 °C to 500 °C. The results of the characterization indicate that the metastable tetragonal zirconia could be stably and evenly dispersed on the surface of alumina nanofibres. The interlaced nanorods of the Al₂O₃@ZrO₂ core/shell nanocomposites resulted in a macropore structure and the spaces between the zirconia nanoparticles dispersed on the alumina nanofibres formed most of the mesopores. Zirconia on the surface of the support promoted the dispersion and influenced the reduction states of the nickel species on the support, so it prevented the nickel species from sintering as well as from forming a spinel phase with alumina at high temperatures, and thus reduced the carbon deposition during the reaction. With the increase of the zirconia content in the catalyst, the catalytic performance for the CO methanation was enhanced. The Ni/Al₂O₃@ZrO₂-15 exhibited the highest CO conversion and methane selectivity at 400 °C, but they decreased dramatically above or below 400 °C due to the temperature sensitivity of the catalyst. Ni/Al₂O₃@ZrO₂-30 exhibited a high and constant rate of methane formation between 350 °C and 450 °C. The excellent catalytic performance of this catalyst is attributed to its reasonable pore structure and good dispersion of zirconia on the support. This catalyst has great potential to be further studied for the future industrial use.     

La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Ni0.2O3−δ hollow fiber membrane reactor: Integrated oxygen separation – CO2 reforming of methane reaction for hydrogen production

An integrated reactor system which combines oxygen permeable La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.8Ni_0.2O_3−δ (LSCN) perovskite ceramic hollow fiber membrane with Ni based catalyst has been successfully developed to produce hydrogen through oxy-CO₂ reforming of methane (OCRM). Dense La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.8Ni_0.2O_3−δ hollow fiber membrane was prepared using phase inversion-sintering method. OCRM reaction was tested from 650 °C to 800 °C with a quartz reactor packed with 0.5 g Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst around the LSCN hollow fiber membrane. CH₄ and CO₂ were used as reactants and air as the oxygen source was fed through the bore side of the hollow fiber membrane. In order to gauge the effectiveness of this membrane reactor system, air flow was closed at 800 °C and dry reforming of methane (DRM) was tested for comparison. The results show that the oxygen fluxes of LSCN membrane swept by helium are nearly 3 times less than those swept by OCRM reactants. With increasing temperature and oxygen supply, methane conversion in the OCRM reactor reaches 100%, but CO₂ conversion decreases from 87% to 72% due to the competition reaction with POM. CO selectivity is as high as nearly 100% at reaction temperatures of 700 °C–800 °C while H₂ selectivity reaches a maximum of 88% at 700 °C. At 800 °C, when air supply was closed and DRM was conducted for comparison, CO selectivity decreased to 91%, resulting in carbon deposition which was around 4 times more than those obtained under OCRM reaction and H₂/CO ratio decreased from 0.93 to 0.74, showing better carbon resistance and higher H₂ selectivity of the Ni-based catalyst over the integrated oxygen separation-OCRM reaction across the LSCN hollow fiber membrane reactor.     

Effect of preparation methods on the performance of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for aqueous-phase reforming of ethanol: Part I-catalytic activity

The effect of preparation method on the performance of Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts for aqueous-phase reforming of ethanol (EtOH) has been investigated. The first catalyst was prepared by a sol–gel (SG) method and for the second one the Al₂O₃ support was made by a solution combustion synthesis (SCS) route and then the metal was loaded by standard wet impregnation. The catalytic activity of these catalysts of different Ni loading was compared with a commercial Al₂O₃ supported Ni catalyst [CM (10%)] at different temperatures, pressures, feed flow rates, and feed concentrations. Based on the product distribution, the proposed reaction pathway is a mixture of dehydrogenation of EtOH to CH₃CHO followed by C–C bond breaking to produce CO + CH₄ and oxidation of CH₃CHO to CH₃COOH followed by decarbonylation to CO₂ + CH₄. CH₄(C₂H₆ and C₃H₈) also can form via Fischer–Tropsch reactions of CO/CO₂ with H₂. The CH₄ (C₂H₆ and C₃H₈) reacts to form hydrogen and carbon monoxide through steam reforming, while CO converts to CO₂ mostly through the water–gas shift reaction (WGSR). SG catalysts showed poorer WGSR activity than the SCS catalysts. The activation energies for H₂ and CO₂ production were 153, 155 and 167 kJ/mol and 158, 160 and 169 kJ/mol for SCS (10%), SG (10%), and CM (10%) samples, respectively.     

Elucidation of cobalt disturbance on Ni/Al2O3 in dissociating hydrogen towards improved CO2 methanation and optimization by response surface methodology (RSM)

In this study, nickel (Ni) and cobalt nickel (Co/Ni) supported on alumina were successfully synthesized by a facile electrolysis procedure and were tested for CO₂ methanation. By applying the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst, CO₂ conversion reached up to of 10 μmol/g.s, which is 1.4 times higher than Co/Ni/Al₂O₃, followed by the parent Al₂O₃. The addition of Co into Ni/Al₂O₃ has formed spinel phase in Co/Ni/Al₂O₃, as well as caused a slight increase in the basicity, which directed to the higher formation of formate species as observed by in-situ CO₂ + H₂ FTIR study. Both catalyst followed the dissociative mechanism during the CO₂ methanation. However, bigger metal particles in Co/Ni/Al₂O₃ caused slower hydrogen dissociation compared to Ni/Al₂O₃, leading to lower yield of CH₄. The optimization study via the response surface methodology (RSM) showed that the yield of CH₄ was significantly affected by reaction temperature, followed by treatment time, the ratio of H₂:CO₂ and lastly the gas hour space velocity (GHSV).