Poly(para‐dioxanone)/poly(D,L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone)

The effect of poly(D ,L ‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone) (PLADO) as the compatibilizer on the properties of the blend of poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) and poly(D ,L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) has been investigated. The 80/20 PPDO/PDLLA blends containing from 1% to 10% of random copolymer PLADO were prepared by solution coprecipitation. The PLADO component played a very important role in determining morphology, thermal, mechanical, and hydrophilic properties of the blends. Addition of PLADO into the blends could enhance the compatibility between dispersed PDLLA phase and PPDO matrix; the boundary between the two phases became unclear and even the smallest holes were not detected. On the other hand, the position of the T_g was composition dependent; when 5% PLADO was added into blend, the T_g distance between PPDO and PDLLA was shortened. The blends with various contents of compatibilizer had better mechanical properties compared with simple PPDO/PDLLA binary polymer blend, and such characteristics further improved as adding 5% random copolymers. The maximum observed tensile strength was 29.05 MPa for the compatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend with 5% PLADO, whereas tensile strength of the uncompatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend was 14.03 MPa, which was the lowest tensile strength. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Miscibility,morphology and thermal properties of poly(para‐dioxanone)/poly(D,L‐lactide) blends

BACKGROUND: Poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) is a biodegradable polyester with excellent biodegradability, bioabsorbability, biocompatibility and mechanical flexibility. However, its high cost and relatively fast degradation rate have hindered the development of commercial applications. Blending with other polymers is a simple and convenient way of modifying the properties of aliphatic polyesters. Poly(D ,L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) is another polyester that has been extensively studied for biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility and suitable degradation rate. However, to our knowledge, blends of PPDO/PDLLA have not been reported in the literature. RESULTS: A series of biodegradable polymers were blended by solution co‐precipitation of PPDO and PDLLA in various blend ratios. The miscibility, morphology and thermal properties of the materials were investigated. DSC curves for all blends revealed two discrete glass transition temperatures which matched the values for pure PPDO and PDLLA. SEM images of fracture surfaces displayed evidence of phase separation consistent with the DSC results. The contact angles increased with the addition of PDLLA. CONCLUSION: PPDO/PDLLA blends exhibit two distinct glass transition temperatures that remain nearly constant and correspond to the glass transition temperatures of the homopolymers for all blend compositions, indicating that blends of PPDO and PDLLA are immiscible. Images of the surface obtained using SEM were also suggestive of a two‐phase material. The crystallinity of the PPDO phase in the blends was affected by the PDLLA content. The mechanical properties of the blends changed dramatically with composition. Adding PDLLA makes the blends less hydrophilic than PPDO. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(l‐lactic acid)/poly(propylene carbonate) blends: Thermal,thermomechanical, and morphological properties

Poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) was blended with poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) with various compositions by a melt‐blending process to evaluate their general properties for a potential flexible packaging field. The mechanical properties, including the tensile strength and modulus, revealed a tendency to decrease with the addition of ductile PPC; this was induced by the poor interfacial adhesion between PLLA and PPC with the cavities and clear edges and was observed through morphological observation. Reactive compatibilization was applied to improve the interfacial adhesion between PLLA and PPC, and the elongation at break was profoundly enhanced because of the improved interfacial adhesion between the two phases. The compatibilized PLLA/PPC blends showed considerable improvements in the storage modulus in the transition region with stable thermal stability; this could be a benefit for thermal processing. The addition of PPC had a great effect on the solidlike behavior and increased the elasticity of the PLLA/PPC blends. Up to 2.0 phr maleic anhydride showed a great efficiency in enhancing the dynamic storage modulus and complex viscosity of the PLLA/PPC blends. We also confirmed that it was feasible to fabricate PLLA/PPC blends with controllable barrier properties with combination of PLLA and PPC under reactive compatibilization while retaining the biodegradability. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43388.     

Investigation of structure and mechanical properties of toughened poly(l‐lactide)/thermoplastic poly(ester urethane) blends

In this study, poly(l ‐lactide) (PLA) is melt‐blended with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) to modify the brittleness of PLA. An aliphatic ester‐based TPU was selected in order to have an ester sensitivity for degradation and an inherent biocompatibility. Using this compatible TPU, there was no need to apply problematic compatibilizers, so the main positive properties of PLA such as biocompatibility and degradability were not challenged. The detected microstructure of PLA/TPU blends showed that when the TPU content was lower than 25 wt %, the structure appeared as sea‐islands, but when the TPU content was increased, the morphology was converted to a cocontinuous microstructure. A higher interfacial surface area in the blend with 25 wt % TPU (PLA25) resulted in a higher toughness and abrasion resistance. The various analyses confirmed interactions and successful coupling of two phases and confirmed that melt‐blending of PLA with the aliphatic ester‐based TPU is a convenient, cost‐effective, and efficient method to conquer the brittleness of PLA. The prepared blends are general‐purpose plastics, but PLA25 showed an optimum mechanical strength, toughness, and biocompatibility suitable for a wide range of applications. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43104.     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) and polystyrene blends with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide)

In this work, the compatibilization of blends of plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene (PS) with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide) (PSnMA) was investigated. The PSnMA was synthesized by emulsion polymerization with different amounts of n‐methylolacrylamide (nMA). Particle size and phase behavior was determined by scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical properties were determined in an Universal Testing Machine. Micrographs revealed that an appreciable size reduction of the dispersed phase was achieved when small amounts of PSnMA were added to the blend, and as the amount of nMA was increased, particle size decreased. When the (PVC/PS/PSnMA) blend was subjected to solvent extraction to remove PS and unreacted PVC, the residue showed a single T_g. Tensile modulus and the ultimate strength of the blends increased with PSnMA content. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(l‐lactide)/poly(butylene succinate) blends through polyester maleation: from materials to properties

The melt blending of poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) with biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) is considered with a view to fine‐tuning its mechanical properties and its degradability. For this purpose, both maleic‐anhydride‐grafted PLLA (PLLA‐g‐MA) and maleic‐anhydride‐grafted PBS (PBS‐g‐MA) were prepared and used as reactive compatibilizers. The influence of PBS melt viscosity on the morphology and mechanical properties of PLLA/PBS blends was studied. Interestingly, the blending of low viscosity PBS with PLLA allows PLLA to be toughened while the use of high viscosity PBS led to PLLA/PBS blends exhibiting co‐continuous morphology. The nanostructure of the co‐continuous blends may be tuned through the joint action of organo‐modified clays and reactive compatibilizers. The effect of PBS on PLLA degradability was also investigated. The accelerated weathering testing of blends reveals that such combination of biodegradable polymers allows their degradability rate to be tailored. It is found that the addition of 20 wt% PBS to PLLA allows the molar mass loss fraction to be doubled after 425 h of testing. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of the compatibility on dielectric performance and breakdown strength of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/low‐density polyethylene blends

Immiscible polymer blends with high dielectric constant (ε) and improved breakdown strength (E_b) performance were obtained by composing poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) or the LDPE grafted with maleic anhydride (LDPE‐g‐MAH) through melt‐blending way. The dielectric properties of these blends were emphasized for considering the compatibility effect on the energy storage application. Interface morphology, co‐continuity behavior, and grafted ratio were simultaneously investigated to detect the compatibility enhancement after introducing MAH. Results showed that the MAH positively improved the dielectric properties. Both the measured E_b of PVDF/LDPE and PVDF/LDPE‐g‐MAH blends showed a minimum value at v^PVDF = 50 vol % because of the worst compatibility; meanwhile, higher E_b of PVDF/LDPE‐g‐MAH than that of PVDF/LDPE blend was observed owing to the better compatibility. For considering the effect interface morphology on the dielectric performance, layer‐structure films composing with pure PVDF and LDPE layers were further constructed and studied. It was revealed that the layered structure could be treated as a helpful way to improve ε and E_b for immiscible polymer blends. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42507.     

Compatibilization of polymer blends from poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) and polycarbonate by oxazoline modification of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) in the melt

A good way of achieving compatibility in polymer blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (S/AN) and bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) is the chemical modification of S/AN in the melt. A catalyzed reaction of the nitrile groups with a substituted 2‐amino alcohol or 2‐amino phenol resulted in a conversion of nitrile groups of 55–75% in 60 min. The introduced heterocyclic structures were ethyl hydroxymethyl oxazoline (EHMOXA) and benzoxazole (BenzOXA), respectively. The use of dibutyltin oxide as a catalyst led to the highest efficiency. The modified polymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared and NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and reactions with organic acids and anhydrides. The modified S/AN showed good technical compatibility (single glass‐transition temperature) with PC in blends made from solution and from the melt. All blends were characterized with oscillating rheometry and differential scanning calorimetry. Rheological measurements showed that EHMOXA–S/AN reacted with PC and had crosslinked structures, whereas BenzOXA–S/AN showed compatibilization without any (crosslinking) reaction. The melt blends of BenzOXA–S/AN and PC showed a downward shift in the complex viscosity due to the influence of the BenzOXA group. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2322–2332, 2003     

Biodegradable poly(L‐lactic acid)/poly(butylene succinate‐co‐adipate) blends: Miscibility,morphology, and thermal behavior

Blends of two biodegradable and semicrystalline polymers, poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) and poly(butylene succinate‐co‐adipate) (PBSA), were prepared by solvent casting in different compositions. The miscibility, morphology, and thermal behavior of the blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. PLLA was found to be immiscible with PBSA as evidenced by two independent glass transitions and biphasic melt. Nonisothermal crystallization measurements showed that fractionated crystallization behavior occurred when PBSA was dispersed as droplets, evidenced by multiple crystallization peaks at different supercooling levels. Crystallization and morphology of the blends were also investigated through two‐step isothermal crystallization. For blends where PLLA was the major component, different content of PBSA did not make a significant difference in the crystallization mechanism and rate of PLLA. For blends where PBSA was the major component, the crystallization rate of PBSA decreased with increasing PLLA content, while the crystallization mechanism did not change. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Effect of the melting temperature on the crystallization behavior of a poly(l‐lactide)/poly(d‐lactide) equimolar mixture

The effect of the final melting temperature (T_f) on the crystallization of poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA)/poly(d ‐lactide) (PDLA) was studied via a combination of differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray scattering, polarized optical microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. We observed that a residual stereocomplex (SC) crystal induced the formation of SC crystals during cooling from a T_f (230°C) just above the melting peak of the SC crystals. On cooling from a T_f (240°C) just above the endset temperature of SC crystal melting [T_m(S)(E)], the possible order structure and the strong interchain interaction promoted the preferential crystallization of SC crystals; this enhanced the formation of α crystals. During cooling from a T_f (≥250°C) far above T_m(S)(E), the crystallization peaks of α and SC crystals converged. The FTIR results indicated that the residual SC crystals, possible ordered structure, and interchain interactions in the melt might have been the key factors for the different crystallization of PLLA/PDLA. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43015.     

Use of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) as compatibilizer in LDPE/thermoplastic tapioca starch blends

Poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) (EVOH) was used as a compatibilizer to make blends of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and plasticized starch (TS). The tensile properties and impact strength were measured and compared with those of neat LDPE. The morphology of the blend specimens, both fractured and unfractured, was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Comparison of the properties showed that the impact strength of the blend improves significantly by the addition of a compatibilizer even with a high TS loading of 40 and 50% (by weight). A high elongation at break almost matching that of neat polyethylene was also obtained. The blend morphology of the etched specimens revealed fine dispersion of the starch in the polyethylene matrix, while the fracture surface morphology clearly indicate that the failure of compatibilized blends occurs mainly by the ductile mode. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 3126–3134, 2002     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(methyl acrylate‐ran‐acrylonitrile)/poly(ethylene) blends through amine–anhydride coupling

Methyl acrylate/acrylonitrile copolymers (MA/AN) were reactively compatibilized as the dispersed phase into poly(ethylene) (PE) for potential hydrocarbon barrier materials. The MA/AN was made reactive by including p‐aminostyrene (PAS), yielding terpolymers (MA/AN/PAS) with pendant primary amine functionality (number average molecular weight = 65–133 kg mol^?1, dispersity (?)=1.83–2.53, molar composition of PAS in copolymer F_PAS = 0.03–0.14, molar composition of AN = F_AN = 0.27–0.52). The non‐functional MA/AN and amino functional MA/AN/PAS were each melt blended into PE that was grafted with maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MAnn) at 200 °C at 70:30 wt % PE‐g‐MAnn:co/terpolymer. After extrusion, the dispersed phase particle size (volume to surface area diameter, ) was coarse (12.6 μm) for the non‐reactive blend whereas it was much lower for the reactive blend ( = 1.2 μm). Coarsening after annealing at 150 °C was slow, but the domain sizes increased only slightly for both cases. The reactive blend was deemed sufficiently stable and thus was suitable as a candidate barrier material for further testing against olefins. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 44177.     

Effect of compatibilization on the oxygen‐barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) blends

The improvement of the oxygen‐barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) via blending with an aromatic polyamide [poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) (MXD6)] was studied. The compatibilization of the blends was attempted through the incorporation of small amounts of sodium 5‐sulfoisophthalate (SIPE) into the PET matrix. The possibility of a transamidation reaction between PET and MXD6 was eliminated by ¹³C‐NMR analysis of melt blends with 20 wt % MXD6. An examination of the blend morphology by atomic force microscopy revealed that SIPE effectively compatibilized the blends by reducing the MXD6 particle size. Thermal analysis showed that MXD6 had a nucleating effect on the crystallization of PET, whereas the crystallization of MXD6 was inhibited, especially in compatibilized blends. Blending 10 wt % MXD6 with PET had only a small effect on the oxygen permeability of the unoriented blend when it was measured at 43% relative humidity, as predicted by the Maxwell model. However, biaxially oriented films with 10 wt % MXD6 had significantly reduced oxygen permeability in comparison with PET. The permeability at 43% relative humidity was reduced by a factor of 3 in compatibilized blends. Biaxial orientation transformed spherical MXD6 domains into platelets oriented in the plane of the film. An enhanced barrier arose from the increased tortuosity of the diffusion pathway due to the high aspect ratio of MXD6 platelets. The aspect ratio was calculated from the macroscopic draw ratio and confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The reduction in permeability was satisfactorily described by the Nielsen model. The decrease in the oxygen permeability of biaxially oriented films was also achieved in bottle walls blown from blends of PET with MXD6. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1361–1370, 2005     

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) copolymer on the properties of polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer on the properties of melt blended polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) 80/20 (wt %) composition was studied. In the literature high ductility levels were achieved by melt blending PLA with different additives. However, the gained ductility was counter balanced with drastic drops in strength and modulus values. The novelty of this work was the preparation of PLA‐based blends with polylactide content higher than 75 wt % which showed an impact resistance value improvement of about 60% compared with the neat PLA and maintained similar tensile strength and modulus values as well as glass transition temperature to neat PLA. The addition of only 3 pph of copolymer to PLA/PMMA blend improved the impact resistance almost 100%. The chemical reaction between PLA/PMMA blend and P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer were analyzed by FTIR, rotational rheometry, and GPC/SEC. Phase structure and morphology were studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Scanning Electronic Microscopy. Tensile and impact properties as well as thermal stability were also studied. Results showed that as the amount of copolymer in the blend was increased then higher was average molecular weight and polydispersity index. After the addition of P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer to the PLA/PMMA blend the impact resistance, elongation at break and thermal stability were improved while tensile strength and elastic modulus remained almost unaltered. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43935.     

Reactive processing compatibilization of direct injection molded polyamide‐6/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Finely dispersed blends of polyamide 6 (PA‐6) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were obtained by direct injection molding throughout the full composition range. The blends comprised a probably pure PA‐6 phase, and a PET phase that was apparently pure in PET‐rich blends and contained slight reacted PA‐6 amounts in PA‐6‐rich blends. This very complex morphology was characterized by the presence of dispersed particles at three levels and by a very large interface area/dispersed phase volume ratio. The linear ductility behavior was attributed to both the presence of reacted copolymers and the large interface area/dispersed volume ratio, and the synergism in both the Young's modulus and yield stress to the increased orientation of the blends related to that of the pure components. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 564–574, 2005     

Poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid)–lithium ionomer as a compatibilizer for poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends (75/25), with contents of poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) partially neutralized with lithium (PEMA–Li) that were systematically changed from 0 to 45% relative to the LLDPE, were obtained by direct injection molding in an attempt to (1) ameliorate the performance of the binary blend and (2) find the best compatibilizer content. PEMA–Li did not modify the PET or LLDPE amorphous‐phase compositions or the crystalline content of PET. However, PEMA–Li did lead to a nucleation effect and to the presence of a second smaller and less perfect crystalline structure. PET induced a fractional crystallization in LLDPE that remained in the presence of PEMA–Li and reduced the crystallinity of LLDPE. The ternary blends showed two similar dispersed LLDPE and PEMA–Li phases with small subparticles, probably PET, inside. The compatibilizing effect of PEMA–Li was clearly shown by the impressive increase in the break strain, along with only small decreases in the modulus of elasticity and in the tensile strength. With respect to the recycling possibilities of LLDPE, a ternary blend with the addition of 22.5% PEMA–Li, which led to very slight modulus and yield stress decreases with respect to the binary blend and a break strain increase of 480%, appeared to be the most attractive. However, the highest property improvement appeared with the addition of 37.5% PEMA–Li, which led to elasticity modulus and tensile strength decreases of only 9%, along with a very high break strain increase (760%). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1322–1328, 2003     

Characterization of the mechanical and thermal properties and morphological behavior of biodegradable poly(L‐lactide)/poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(L‐lactide)/poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L‐lactate) polymeric blends

Two series of biodegradable polymer blends were prepared from combinations of poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) with poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L ‐lactate) (PBSL) in proportions of 100/0, 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30 (based on the weight percentage). Their mechanical properties were investigated and related to their morphologies. The thermal properties, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and melt flow index analysis of the binary blends and virgin polymers were then evaluated. The addition of PCL and PBSL to PLLA reduced the tensile strength and Young's modulus, whereas the elongation at break and melt flow index increased. The stress–strain curve showed that the blending of PLLA with ductile PCL and PBSL improved the toughness and increased the thermal stability of the blended polymers. A morphological analysis of the PLLA and the PLLA blends revealed that all the PLLA/PCL and PLLA/PBSL blends were immiscible with the PCL and PBSL phases finely dispersed in the PLLA‐rich phase. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Mechanical properties and morphological changes of poly(lactic acid)/polycarbonate/poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) blend through reactive processing

The mechanical properties and morphological changes of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), polycarbonate (PC), and poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT) polymer blends were investigated. Several types of blend samples were prepared by reactive processing (RP) with a twin‐screw extruder using dicumyl peroxide (DCP) as a radical initiator. Dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA) of binary polymer blends of PC/PBAT indicated that each component was miscible over a wide range of PC/PBAT mixing ratios. DMA of PLA/PBAT/PC ternary blends revealed that PBAT is miscible with PC even in the case of ternary blend system and the miscibility of PLA and PBAT can also be modified through RP. As a result, the tensile strain and impact strength of the ternary blends was increased considerably through RP, especially for PLA/PBAT/PC = 42/18/40 (wt/wt/wt) with DCP (0.3 phr). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of the PLA/PBAT/PC blends revealed many small spherical island phases with a domain size of approximately 0.05–1 μm for RP, whereas it was approximately 10 μm without RP. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Influence of the mixing time on the phase structure and glass‐transition behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (70 : 30 w/w) were prepared via a melt‐mixing process at 280°C with various mixing times. The melt‐mixed blends were analyzed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical measurements, transmission electron microscopy, and tensile tests. The results indicate that the blends mixed for short times had lower extents of transesterification and were miscible to a limited extent. The blends initially show two glass transitions, which approached more closely and merged gradually with increasing mixing time. A mechanical model was used to help understand the glass‐transition behavior. With increasing mixing time, the phase structure of the blends improved, and this led to an increase in the tensile strength. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Compatibilization of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)–poly(lactic acid) blends with diisocyanates

Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) was blended with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) with various reactive processing agents to decrease its brittleness and enhance its processability. Three diisocyanates, namely, hexamethylene diisocyanate, poly(hexamethylene diisocyanate), and 1,4‐phenylene diisocyanate, were used as compatibilizing agents. The morphology, thermomechanical properties, and rheological behavior were investigated with scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, tensile testing, dynamomechanical thermal analysis in torsion mode (dynamic mechanical analysis), and oscillatory rheometry with a parallel‐plate setup. The presence of the diisocyanates resulted in an enhanced polymer blend compatibility; this led to an improvement in the overall mechanical performance but did not affect the thermal stability of the system. A slight reduction in the PHBV crystallinity was observed with the incorporation of the diisocyanates. The addition of diisocyanates to the PHBV–PLA blend resulted in a notable increase in the final complex viscosity at low frequencies when compared with the same system without compatibilizers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44806.