Spherulitic morphology and growth of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) blends by optical microscopy

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), both semicrystalline polymers, are miscible as shown by the single glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. Morphology of PVDF/PHBV blends was investigated by optical microscopy under two different crystallization conditions. PVDF showed the spherulitic morphology at 150 °C in the PVDF/PHBV blends, where PHBV acted as the noncrystallizing component. PHBV also showed the spherulitic morphology within the matrix of the pre-existing PVDF crystals when PVDF/PHBV blends were quenched from the melt to the crystallization temperature below the melting point of PHBV. The spherulitic growth of PHBV was investigated as the function of both blend composition and crystallization temperature.     

Fully biodegradable blends of poly(l-lactide) and poly(ethylene succinate): Miscibility, crystallization, and mechanical properties

Both poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) and poly(ethylene succinate) (PES) are biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters. The disadvantages of poor mechanical properties and slow crystallization rate of PLLA limit its wide application. Fully biodegradable polymer blends were prepared by blending PLLA with PES. Miscibility, crystallization behavior, and mechanical properties of PLLA/PES blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing optical microscopy (POM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and tensile tests in this work. Experimental results indicated that PLLA was immiscible with PES. Crystallization of PLLA/PES blends was studied by DSC using two-step crystallization condition and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PLLA at 100 °C was accelerated with the increase of PES in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PES at 67.5 °C, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the crystallization rate decreased with the increase of PLLA. The mechanical properties of PLLA/PES blends were examined by tensile testing. The elongation at break of PLLA was improved significantly in the blends, while its considerably high Young's modulus was still kept. SEM images of fracture surfaces indicated that the fracture behavior of PLLA/PES blends changed from brittle fracture to ductile fracture behavior in the blends.     

Studies on blends of binary crystalline polymers: Miscibility and crystallization behavior in PBT/PAr(I27-T73)

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of binary crystalline blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) [PBT] and polyarylate based on Bisphenol A and a 27/73 mole ratio of isophthalic and terephthalic acids [PAr(I27-T73)] have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This blend system exhibits a single composition-dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. The equilibrium melting point depression of PBT was observed, and Flory interaction parameter χ₁₂ = −0.96 was obtained. These indicate that the blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The crystallization rate of PBT decreased as the amount of PAr(I27-T73) increased, and a contrary trend was found when PAr(I27-T73) crystallized with the increase of the amount of PBT. The addition of high-T_g PAr(I27-T73) would suppress the segmental mobility of PBT, while low-T_g PBT would have promotional effect on PAr(I27-T73). The crystallization rate and melting point of PBT were significantly influenced when the PAr(I27-T73) crystallites are previously formed. It is because not only does the amorphous phase composition shift to a richer PBT content after the crystallization of PAr(I27-T73), but also the PAr(I27-T73) crystal phase would constrain the crystallization of PBT. Thus, effects of the glass transition temperature, interaction between components, and previously formed crystallites of one component on the crystallization behavior of the other component were discussed and compared with blends of PBT and PAr(I-100) based on Bisphenol A and isophthalic acid.     

Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) and its blends with poly(ethylene oxide): miscibility, phase behavior and hydrogen bonding interactions

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) (PHES) was synthesized through polycondensation of bisphenol S with epichlorohydrin. It was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The miscibility in the blends of PHES with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was established on the basis of the thermal analysis results. DSC showed that the PHES/PEO blends prepared by casting from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) possessed single, composition-dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs), indicating that the blends are miscible in amorphous state. At elevated temperatures, the PHES/PEO blends underwent phase separation. The phase behavior was investigated by optical microscope and the cloud point curve was determined. A typical lower critical solution temperature behavior was observed in the moderate temperature range for this blend system. FTIR studies indicate that there are the competitive hydrogen bonding interactions upon adding PEO to the system, which was involved with the intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, i.e. -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO between PHES and PEO. In terms of the infrared spectroscopic investigation, it is judged that from weak to strong the strength of the hydrogen bonding interactions is in the following order: -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO.     

Molecular dynamics and dissipative particle dynamics simulations for the miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl chloride) blends

The miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends are investigated by atomistic molecular dynamics and mesoscale dissipative dynamics simulations. The specific volumes of three PEO/PVC blends (with weight ratio at 70/30, 50/50 and 30/70) as well as pure PEO and PVC are examined as a function of temperature. The glass transition temperatures are estimated to be 251, 268, 280, 313 and 350 K for pure PEO, PEO/PVC 70/30, 50/50, 30/70 and pure PVC. Among different energy contributions, the torsion and van der Waals energies exhibit pronounced kinks versus temperature. The Flory-Huggins parameters determined from the cohesive energy densities and the radial distribution functions of the inter-molecular atoms suggest that PEO/PVC 70/30 and 30/70 blends are more miscible than 50/50 blend. This is further supported by the morphologies of PEO/PVC blends, in which the 50/50 blend exhibits segregated domains implying a weak phase separation. Hydrogen bonds are found to form between O atoms of PEO and H atoms of PVC, with a larger degree in PEO/PVC 70/30 and 30/70 blends than in 50/50 blend. The addition of PVC into PEO suppresses the mobility of PEO chains, which is consistent with the experiment observation of decreased crystallization rate as well as crystallization temperature of PEO.     

Glass transition behavior and miscibility in blends of poly(vinyl p-phenol) with two homologous aliphatic polyesters

New miscible blend systems comprised of poly(4-vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and a homologous series of polyesters of different CH₂/CO ratios (from 4.5 to 7) was discovered. Miscibility has been confirmed using differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The PVPh/polyesters blends investigated exhibited a single composition-dependent glass transition and homogeneous phase morphology, and they similarly exhibited a cusp in the T_g-composition relationships. This work further extended the range of aliphatic polyesters that are known to be miscible with PVPh. The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) or energy density (B) obtained from analysis of melting point depression for PVPh/PEAz and PVPh/PHS blends are of negative values. More interestingly, the specific interactions in the PVPh/polyester blends change with the corresponding different structures in the polyester component. For the PVPh/PHS blend whose polyester constituent possesses a lower carbonyl density in the main chain (average CH₂/CO ratio=7), the energy density B was found to be −1.17 cal cm⁻³. This value is significantly lower than those for either the PVPh/PEAz (CH₂/CO=4.5) blend system (B=−7.72 cal cm⁻³). Miscibility, specific interactions, and peculiar T_g-composition relationships in the blends of PVPh with selected homologous polyesters are discussed.     

Polymer electrolytes based on a ternary miscible blend of poly(ethylene oxide), poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin) and poly(vinyl ethyl ether)

Ternary blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin) (PBE) and poly(vinyl ethyl ether) (PVEE) were obtained as films and characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and vibrational spectroscopy (FTIR). From the DSC results, phase diagrams for the ternary blends were determined, where the variation of the viscoelastic phase extent as a function of the polymers composition was determined. The DSC results also indicated miscibility of the system, exhibiting only one glass transition temperature (T_g) and decrease in the crystallinity of the system, as well as decrease in the crystallinity of PEO present in the blends. Vibrational spectroscopy (FTIR) provided information on the intermolecular interactions between the pairs PBE/PEO and PBE/PVEE, via hydrogen bond interaction. From the FTIR analyses, molecular model systems of equilibrium among the interacting structures were proposed as a molecular basis for the miscibility of the system.Polymer electrolytes based on the ternary blend containing 60/25/15 (PEO/PBE/PVEE) mass percent and lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄) were obtained and characterized by DSC, FTIR, optical microscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Solid electrolytes containing up to 10 wt% LiClO₄ exhibited a single-phase behavior, evidenced by the DSC results. For these electrolytes, FTIR spectra indicated the formation of polymer-ion complexes, in which the cation (Li⁺) acts favoring the polymer-polymer miscibility. Electrolytes containing LiClO₄ higher than 10 wt% exhibit a multiple phase behavior, in which a PEO-rich, salt-containing phase is present in equilibrium with PBE or PVEE-rich phases. Maximum ionic conductivity at room temperature, for the electrolyte containing 20 wt% LiClO₄, reached 4.23 × 10⁻³ Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹, while all samples exhibited conductivity of approximately 10⁻¹ Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 80 °C.     

Behaviour of the miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide)/liquid crystal blends

The microscopic behaviour of blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with two different low molecular weight liquid crystals (LC) was studied in order to evaluate miscibility. One of the liquid crystal components had a phase transition temperature lower than the melting temperature of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and the other a higher value. The low molecular weight liquid crystal components were 4-cyano-4′-n-heptylbiphenyl (7CB) and p-cyanophenyl p-pentyloxybenzoate (pCP). Thermal analysis and polarized optical and scanning electron microscopy were employed. The melting temperature (T_m) depression of PEO increased with LC content in the blend, suggesting that the PEO was miscible with both liquid crystals in the isotropic phase. The spherulitic structural morphology of the semicrystalline components is affected by the presence of liquid crystals. © 1998 SCI.     

Miscibility in blends of liquid crystalline copolyester and semicrystalline poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate)

The miscibility in blends of random liquid crystalline copoly(oxybenzoate-ethylene terephthalate) at a molar ratio of 60:40 (P64) and semicrystalline poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate) (PEN) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry, wide angle X-ray diffraction and polarized optical micrography. It was found that P64 and PEN were partially miscible as evidenced from the appearance of a single glass transition temperature for each blend at different compositions. Furthermore, the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter, χ₁₂, for P64 and PEN was determined to be −1.13 through the melting point depression analysis, indicating miscibility in blends of P64 and PEN at the melt state. The coherence lengths of PEN in the presence of a small amount of P64, around 3%, were larger than that in pure PEN, implying the regularity of PEN crystals in the blends with low P64 content being more perfect than that of the pure PEN.     

In situ FTIR microscope study on crystallization of crystalline/crystalline polymer blends of bacterial copolyesters

This study describes in situ observation of crystallization in a spherulite of blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [PHBV] and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxypropionate) [PHBP] by FTIR microscopy. In order to trace the crystallization processes of blend components separately, PHBV was deuterated. The C-D and CO stretching bands in the IR spectra, respectively, show the crystallization behavior of PHBV and the whole blend. D-PHBV containing 6 and 8% HV [D-PHBV6 and D-PHBV8] are blended with PHBP containing 11% HP [PHBP11]. The crystallization rates of D-PHBV6, D-PHBV8 and PHBP11 decrease in this order. In case of the blend of D-PHBV8 and PHBP11 the crystalline peaks of C-D and CO bands grows simultaneously during crystallization, and the growth rates are rather close to that of D-PHBV8. The results indicate that D-PHBV8, which is the component that shows higher crystallization rate in the pure state, leads the cocrystallization of the blend. For D-PHBV6/PHBP11, on the other hand, the crystalline peak of C-D band grows faster than that of CO band, indicating that the crystallization of D-PHBV6 proceeds before the crystallization of PHBP11. During the crystallization of D-PHBV6, PHBP11 molecules get away from the growing front of the spherulite, i.e. the phase segregation precedes the crystallization. These results demonstrate that FTIR microscopy is a powerful tool to trace the formation of different crystalline phases, such as cocrystallization and phase segregation.     

Tacticity effects on the miscibility behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide-b-dimethylsiloxane-b-ethylene oxide) blends

The miscibility of a triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(dimethylsiloxane)-poly(ethylene oxide) with syndiotactic and isotactic poly(methylmethacrylate) wasstudied. Although isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was miscible with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in the pure state, it was immiscible with the PEO end blocks in the copolymer. In comparison, the syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA) was miscible with the PEO blocks as indicated by melting point depression, decrease in crystallinity, and slower rate of spherulite growth of PEO. When blends of the triblock copolymer were cooled to low temperatures, the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) middle block which resided in the interlamellar region of PEO spherulites also crystallized; the development of PDMS crystals was clearly suppressed at high sPMMA contents.On leave from Union Chemical Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), both semicrystalline polymers, were prepared by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Phase contrast microscopy was used to probe the miscibility of PEOB/PCL blends. Experimental results indicated that PEO was immiscible with PCL because the melt was biphasic. Crystallization of PEO/PCL blends was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PEO decreased with the increase of PCL in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PCL, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the change in the crystallization rate was not very big, or almost constant with the addition of PEO, compared with the change of the crystallization rate of PEO.     

Miscibility and interactions in blends and complexes of poly(4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole) with proton-donating polymers

The miscibility and interactions in blends and complexes of poly(4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole) (PMVT) with poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(vinylphosphonic acid) (PVPA) were studied. PMVT formed complexes with PVPA but not with PVPh and PAA. Each of the blends of PMVT with PVPh and PAA showed a single glass transition temperature (T_g), indicating miscibility. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies provided the existence of interactions in the PMVT blends and complexes. The XPS studies indicated that the thiazole nitrogen atoms are involved in hydrogen-bonding interactions with PVPh and PAA, and ionic interactions with PVPA. The sulfur atoms of PMVT also interact with PVPh, PAA and PVPA.     

Transition of spherulite morphology in a crystalline/crystalline binary blend of biodegradable microbial polyesters

Crystalline/crystalline binary blend films of microbial polyesters composed of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3hydroxyhexanoate] (P(3HB-co-3HH)) and poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] (P(3HB)) that exhibit a morphological change are prepared by solvent casting. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements indicate that P(3HB-co-3HH) and P(3HB) are miscible for all blend ratios because a single glass transition temperature is observed. Polarization optical microscopy is used to investigate the transition of spherulite morphology and measure the radial growth rate of spherulites in the blend films. P(3HB-co-3HH) and P(3HB) contain positive spherulites, whereas in the binary blends, spherulite morphology changes from positive to negative. This change is related to the different growth rates of P(3HB-co-3HH) and P(3HB) lamellar crystals. Partial enzymatic degradation of the film surfaces reveals that the lamellar crystals of negative spherulites are oriented both perpendicular and parallel to the radial direction of spherulites. A new growth mechanism for spherulites in crystalline/crystalline blends is constructed from the results obtained for the blend films.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(n-propyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(n-propyl methacrylate) (PPMA) is miscible with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) over the whole composition range as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature in each blend. The interaction between PPMA and PVA was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The interactions mainly involve the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the carbonyl groups of PPMA. The measurements of proton spin-lattice relaxation time reveal that PPMA and PVA do not mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm, but are miscible on a scale of 20-30 nm. A small negative interaction parameter value has been obtained by melting point depression measurement.     

Effects of lithium perchlorate on poly(ethylene oxide) spherulite morphology and spherulite growth kinetics

Effects of lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄) on the crystallization behaviors of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and polarized optical microscopy (POM) in PEO/LiClO₄ system. DSC results indicate that there are nucleation effects of LiClO₄ on the crystallization of PEO. But, on the other hand, the coordination of lithium ion with the oxygen ether atoms of PEO can obviously reduce the crystallinity and spherulite growth rate of PEO. This contrary effect of LiClO₄ on the crystallization of PEO in PEO/LiClO₄ complexes system was analyzed and discussed in detail. The Laurizen–Hoffman theory was used to describe the Li‐coordinated crystallization kinetics of PEO spherulite. It showed that the nucleation constant (K_g) and folding surface free energy (σ_e) decreased with increasing LiClO₄ contents, and the energy necessary for the transport of segments across the liquid–solid interface (ΔE) increased on increasing the contents of LiClO₄. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Studies on the miscibility and phase structure in blends of poly(epichlorohydrin) and poly(vinyl acetate)

The miscibility of atactic poly(epichlorohydrin) (aPECH) with poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was examined under two different conditions: (i) in dilute solution, using vicometeric measurements and (ii) as cast films, using differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and FT-infrared spectroscopy. Phase separation on heating, i.e. lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior of the aPECH/PVAc blends was examined by the measurement of transmitted light intensity against temperature. From viscosity measurements, the Krigbaum-Wall polymer-polymer interaction (ΔB) was evaluated. The DSC results show that the aPECH/PVAc blends are miscible as evidenced by the observation of a single composition-dependent glass-transition temperature (T_g) which is well described by the Couchman and Gordon Taylor models. The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) calculated from the T_g-method was negative and equal to −0.01, indicating a relatively low interaction strength. The FT-IR results match very well with those of DSC. The cloud point phenomenon is thermodynamically driven but phase separation, once taken place, is diffusion controlled in normal accessible time.     

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(4-vinylphenol-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate): thermal analysis, morphological behaviour and specific interactions

DSC and optical microscopy were used to determine the miscibility and crystallinity of blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(4-vinylphenol-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PVPh-HEM). A single glass transition temperature was observed for all blends, indicating miscibility. A progressive decrease in the degree of crystallinity and in the size of the PEO spherullites is observed, as PVPh-HEM is added. FTIR was used to probe the intermolecular specific interactions of the blends and the miscibility of the blend is mainly attributed to PVPh-HEM/PEO intermolecular interactions via hydrogen bonding.     

Transesterification reaction kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The transesterification reaction of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends during melt‐mixing was studied as a function of blending temperature, blending time, blend composition, processing equipment, and different grades of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate). Results show that the major factors controlling the reaction are the temperature and time of blending. Efficiency of mixing also plays an important role in transesterification. The reaction kinetics can be modeled using a second‐order direct ester–ester interchange reaction. The rate constant (k) was found to have a minimum value at an intermediate PEN content and the activation energy of the rate constant was calculated to be 140 kJ/mol. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2422–2436, 2001