Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients

To determine if chemotherapy dose intensity influences treatment outcome in advanced ovarian cancer, all randomised studies of first line chemotherapy, published between 1975 and 1989, were analysed for relationships between planned dose intensity and (a) objective response and (b) median survival. Total dose intensity of each study regimen was calculated and a weighted regression model providing for systemic differences in response or survival among studies was utilised. Hence, treatment arms of different studies were never directly compared. In addition, relative dose intensities of individual drugs within combinations was similarly evaluated. The improvement in objective response rate when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 12% and 16% depending on baseline response rate. The improvement in median survival when adding one unit of total dose intensity ranged between 2 and 4 months. One unit of total dose intensity corresponds to, for example, 20 mg m2 week of cisplatin, or 25 mg m2 week of doxorubicin, or 350 mg m2 week of cyclophosphamide. The analysis of individual drugs suggested that doxorubicin and the platinum compounds were about equally effective, with cyclophosphamide being less effective. The methodological benefits and limitations of the approach used and the implication of the results are discussed.     

Phase I multicenter study of combined high-dose ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Swiss Group for Clinical Research (SAKK)

Ifosfamide and doxorubicin are the most active agents in the treatment of sarcomas and are characterized by a marked dose-response relationship. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of both agents in combination under granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cover. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with untreated sarcomas (soft tissue: n = 20; gynecological: n = 11; bone: n = 2) were treated with ifosfamide 12 g/m2 by continuous i.v. infusion over five days and doxorubicin with dose escalation from 50 mg/m2 i.v. bolus divided on two days, then to 60 mg/m2 bolus divided on three days. Ifosfamide was reduced to 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin was further escalated up to 90 mg/m2. GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously) was started 24 hours after chemotherapy and continued for 10 days. RESULTS: The MTD was reached with the combination of ifosfamide at 12 g/m2 and doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2. But with ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 the MTD was not obtained. While severe leukopenia and granulopenia were observed at all-dose levels, severe anemia was more frequently related to the highest dose of ifosfamide. Severe thrombopenia and mucositis were more commonly observed at the highest dose of doxorubicin. Ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 induced WHO grade 4 leukopenia in 58%, grade 3-4 thrombopenia in 42%, and anemia in 31% of cycles. Mucositis was minor in 50% of cycles. The overall response rate among 31 evaluable patients was 55% (95 confidence interval (CI): 36%-73%), with four (13%) complete responders and 13 (42%) partial responders. Response rates based on soft-tissue sarcomas or gynecological sarcomas alone were similar. Ten patients could be treated by elective surgery and/or radiotherapy. The total group of patients reached a median survival of two years, with 25% (SE 8%) survivors after three years. CONCLUSIONS: The dose level of ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 with supportive GM-CSF is manageable in a multicenter setting and should be further tested in regular phase II trials, including patients with gynecological and soft-tissue sarcomas. Transient toxicity with myelosuppression should be accepted in order to obtain a high antitumor activity of this regimen and a potential improvement in survival.     

A guinea pig''s view on prostate cancer screening trials

Although the combination of paclitaxel with doxorubicin has yielded high response rates in metastatic breast cancer, severe cardiotoxic events have been reported in several patients. The rationale for our study was to evaluate the activity of paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination in patients with this disease but to avoid excessive cardiotoxicity. Therefore, we administered 4 cycles of doxorubicin/paclitaxel followed by 6 cycles of standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen. Study medication consisted of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 as a 15-min intravenous infusion followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion. CMF regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 as 1-hour intravenous infusion followed by methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 bolus injection. The main toxicity of doxorubicin/paclitaxel treatment phase was neutropenia (WHO grade 3/4, 58%), but we observed only one cardiac adverse event. Toxicities of the CMF treatment phase were not significant. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, 2 (8%) had complete responses and 11 (46%) achieved partial response. Ten additional patients (42%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 12 months and the median overall survival was 18.5 months. The sequential administration of doxorubicin and paclitaxel followed by CMF appeared active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Methotrexate in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) is a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases resulting in chronic idiopathic peripheral arthritis. The aetiology of JRA is unclear, and current pharmacotherapy is ameliorative rather than curative. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are given initially, but only one-third to one-fourth of patients are managed adequately with these agents. Advanced therapeutic drugs, frequently referred to as disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or second-line agents, are given to the child with aggressive or resistant disease. Among these, the antimetabolite methotrexate has proven to be the most effective in alleviating articular disease manifestations and reducing laboratory parameters of inflammation. When given orally in low dosages (10 to 15 mg/m2/week), methotrexate is well tolerated, without evidence of substantial bone marrow suppression or severe hepatotoxicity. Extensive long term tolerability data are not yet available for children, but longitudinal studies in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis suggest that the drug may be given safely for extended periods in many patients. Paediatric rheumatologists are beginning to give higher dosages of methotrexate (up to 1 mg/kg/week) parenterally with some success. The long term consequences of higher dose methotrexate in children are unknown. Methotrexate has now become, and will probably remain for some time, the drug of first choice for children with recalcitrant JRA.     

Long-term nephrotoxicity of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and methotrexate in osteosarcoma

The acute renal effects of chemotherapy are known, but long-term nephrotoxicity has rarely been investigated. The aim of the present study was to assess long-term renal function in children and adolescents who received at-risk chemotherapy, including cisplatin, ifosfamide, and methotrexate, to treat an osteosarcoma. Renal function tests [creatinine clearance, microalbuminuria, and renal excretion of sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), and uric acid] were prospectively performed 5.4+/-2.2 (+/-SD) years after chemotherapy (total cumulative dose: methotrexate 41+/-31 g/m2, ifosfamide 39+/-14 g/m2, cisplatin 674+/-188 mg/m2) in 18 children and adolescents. The results were compared with 13 normal volunteers matched for age and sex. Creatinine clearance, which was greater than 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in all patients, correlated with the total dose of ifosfamide (r=0.55, P<0.05) and cisplatin (r=0.48, P<0.05). Microalbuminuria was noted in 4 patients. Hypomagnesemia was present in 4 and hypercalciuria in 3 patients; renal excretion of P, Mg, and uric acid was higher in patients than in controls. Glomerular function was not significantly altered and only mild tubular dysfunction was present. Since renal excretion of P and Mg were increased in patients compared with normal volunteers and hypercalciuria was occasionally seen, divalent ion disorders are the most-likely potential complications.     

Ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy in Ewing's sarcoma: The Second United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and the Medical Research Council Ewing's Tumor Study

PURPOSE: To investigate the possibility that the substitution of ifosfamide for cyclophosphamide therapy for Ewing's sarcoma will improve survival over that seen in the first United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) Ewing's tumor study (ET-1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1993,243 patients (138 men or boys) were entered onto the study. The median age was 13.5 years (range, 1.5 to 27 years). The median follow-up was 58 months. Chemotherapy included four courses of vincristine 2 mg/m2; ifosfamide 9 g/m2; and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. Treatment of the primary tumor was with surgery and/or radiotherapy followed by ifosfamide 6 g/m2; doxorubicin 60 mg/m2; and vincristine 2 mg/m2; with actinomycin D 1.5 mg/m2 substituted for doxorubicin after a total dose of 420 mg/m2. RESULTS: Two hundred one patients had no metastases. One hundred eighteen patients had tumors of the axial skeleton and 125 patients had limb primary tumors. The major toxicities were hematologic and infective, but there were no toxic deaths. The overall survival rate was 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56 to 69) and relapse-free survival (RFS) 56% (95% CI, 49 to 62). For those with no metastases at diagnosis, the RFS rate was 62% and for those with metastases, 23%. Multivariate analysis showed age and site to have a significant effect on RFS. Pelvic sites had the worst RFS rate of 41%; other axial sites, 55%; and extremity tumors, 73%. Age younger than 10 years had an RFS rate of 86% versus 55% for older patients. The local relapse rate for axial tumors was 20% and for limb primary tumors was 2.4%. CONCLUSION: The 5-year survival rate of 62% is improved compared with the 44% survival rate achieved in ET-1. This is probably caused by the use of higher doses of ifosfamide compared with relatively low doses of cyclophosphamide in ET-1.     

Phase I study of tauromustine administered in a weekly schedule

Tauromustine was administered orally in weekly doses with interindividual dose escalation to patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. The dose in the first cohort of 6 patients was 20 mg/m2/week. The dose escalation was 5 mg/m2/week. The limit of tolerance was 55 mg/m2/week. 99 patients completed at least 8 weeks of treatment and eight dose levels were evaluated for toxicity. Reversible thrombocytopenia, and to a lesser degree leukopenia, were dose limiting. From a starting dose of 40 mg/m2/week, the long-term tolerated dose was 35 mg/m2/week, thus achieving a considerable increase of dose intensity without a significant increase of toxicity by employing this weekly schedule of tauromustine.     

Carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The carboplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen M-CAVI (methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine) is active against bladder carcinoma and can be administered to patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin or doxorubicin. The authors designed a randomized study to evaluate whether M-CAVI offers a therapeutic advantage over the cisplatin-based regimen M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in the treatment of patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma were enrolled on a randomized trial comparing M-CAVI, which consists of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 on Day 2, adjusted using Calvert's formula for an area under the curve of 5), methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on Days 1, 15, and 22), and vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on Days 2, 15, and 22) administered every 28 days, versus standard M-VAC. The eligibility criteria included histologically proven bladder carcinoma, surgically incurable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: From January 1989 to January 1994, 47 assessable patients were included. Seventeen patients had lymph node disease and 30 had distant metastatic disease. Twenty-three patients were randomized to receive M-CAVI and 24 to receive M-VAC. Patient characteristics in the two groups were similar. Overall response rates were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-62%) for M-CAVI and 52% (95% CI, 30-73%) for M-VAC (P = 0.3), with 3 complete responses observed among patients treated with M-VAC and none among those in the M-CAVI group. M-VAC was associated with more gastrointestinal toxicity, stomatitis, alopecia, and Grade 4 neutropenia than M-CAVI. One toxicity-related death occurred in the M-VAC group. There was a statistically significant difference in median disease-related survival time favoring M-VAC (16 months; range, 6 to 22+) versus M-CAVI (9 months; range, 6 to 14+) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: M-CAVI is less toxic but less active than M-VAC in the treatment of patients with advanced bladder carcinoma. Carboplatin-based regimens in which carboplatin is administered at the dose range used in the current study should be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin treatment. Further research is required to assess the impact of high dose carboplatin in the treatment of this disease.     

Phase I study of a weekly 1 h infusion of paclitaxel in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma will develop either unresectable or metastatic disease and, therefore, are candidates for systemic chemotherapy. Only a few chemotherapeutic agents have shown documented activity in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and there is clearly a need for the evaluation of new active drugs. Therefore, we performed a phase I trial with a weekly schedule of paclitaxel in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. 16 patients with documented progression of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included. After premedication, paclitaxel was given as a 1 h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 representing one treatment cycle. The cycle was repeated every 50 days. The starting dose was 70 mg/m2 and the doses were escalated in steps of 10 mg/m2/week. A minimum of 3 patients were treated at each dose level. All treatment was given on an out-patient basis. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at a dose of 100 mg/m2/week with 2 of 6 patients treated at that dose level having WHO grade 4 neutropenia. Other toxic side-effects were only mild. 1 partial response and 9 cases with disease stabilisation were observed in 16 patients with initially progressive disease. We, therefore, conclude that the recommended dose for a further phase II trial in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is 90 mg/m2/week. These data indicate that paclitaxel given at this dose and schedule might have activity in hepatocellular carcinoma and further investigation in phase II trials is warranted.     

Quality assurance in renography: a review

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PL-DOX) has been shown in preclinical models to induce less cardiotoxicity than non-liposomal doxorubicin. Endomyocardial biopsy is a highly sensitive and specific method for detecting anthracycline-induced cardiac damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myocardial tissue from ten KS patients who had received cumulative PL-DOX (20 mg/m2/biweekly) of 440-840 mg/m2 was evaluated for evidence of anthracycline-induced cardiac damage. Controls were assembled from patients who had received cumulative doxorubicin doses of 174-671 mg/m2 in two earlier cardiac biopsy protocols. Two control groups were selected on the basis of both cumulative (+/- 10 mg/m2) and peak doxorubicin dose (60 or 20 mg/m2, control group 1), or peak dose alone (20 mg/m2, control group 2). RESULTS: PL-DOX patients had significantly lower biopsy scores compared with those of doxorubicin controls despite higher cumulative doses of anthracycline. The median biopsy scores for the PL-DOX and doxorubicin groups, respectively, were 0.3 vs. 3.0 (P = 0.002, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel row mean difference test) for group 1 and 1.25 for group 2 (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). CONCLUSIONS: Less severe cardiac changes were seen in patients given PL-DOX relative to historical control patients given comparable cumulative doses of doxorubicin.     

Intensified adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy: a dose-finding study for ambulatory patients with breast cancer

Escalating doses of cyclophosphamide were given every 3 weeks as adjuvant treatment for women operated for breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given with constant doses of methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2; CMF) as an outpatient treatment without the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF). The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 250 mg/m2 starting from the dose of 1,000 mg/m2. Mesna was given to prevent cystitis. The criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were grade IV granulocytopenia lasting for longer than 48 h, granulocytopenic infection or other grade IV toxicities. G-CSF and ofloxacin were used if grade IV granulocytopenia continued for longer than 48 h or if granulocytopenic infection occurred. At the dose level of 1,500 mg/m2 (500 mg/m2/week) 22 (92%) of the 24 patients had grade IV granulocytopenia during the 6 CMF cycles given, but only 3 (13%) had granulocytopenic fever. G-CSF was used in 28% of the cycles at this dose level. Other toxicities included complete alopecia (79%), nausea and vomiting. Sixteen (80%) of the premenopausal women became postmenopausal. At the dose level of 1,750 mg/m2 all 3 patients treated had to be hospitalized after the first cycle due to neutropenic infection (n = 2) or intractable vomiting even though prophylactic G-CSF was used. We conclude that intravenous CMF with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1,500 mg/m2 given at 3-week intervals with the selective use of prophylactic G-CSF is feasible as adjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer.     

Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin

Cremophor EL (cremophor), a component of the paclitaxel formulation, can potentially reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance. A Phase I trial of cremophor as a 6-h infusion every 3 weeks was performed with bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2). The cremophor dose was escalated from 1 to 60 ml/m2. A standard paclitaxel premedication was given before cremophor. Using a bioassay, potentially active cremophor levels (> or = 1 microl/ml) were measured in plasma from patients receiving cremophor doses of 30, 45, and 60 ml/m2. A cross-over design was used to assess the influence of cremophor 30 ml/m2 on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol. The plasma area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of doxorubicin increased from 1448 +/- 350 to 1786 +/- 264 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02) in the presence of cremophor, whereas the AUC of doxorubicinol increased from 252 +/- 104 to 486 +/- 107 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02). This pharmacokinetic interaction was associated with significantly increased neutropenia. With reduction of the doxorubicin dose to 35 mg/m2, the cremophor dose was increased to 60 ml/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two of six patients after 45 ml/m2 and two of four patients after 60 ml/m2, which included febrile neutropenia and grade III cremophor-related toxicities of rash, pruritus, headache, and hypotension. All patients who received 45 ml/m2 cremophor reached plasma levels > or = 1.5 microl/ml, but at 60 ml/m2, only two of four reached this level, and the calculated plasma clearance of cremophor was significantly faster at this dose. One patient with hepatoma resistant to epirubicin achieved a near-complete response. Cremophor 45 ml/m2 over 6 h with 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin is recommended for further studies. The pharmacokinetic interaction between cremophor and doxorubicin is quantitatively similar to that described in trials of paclitaxel with doxorubicin and suggests that the cremophor in the paclitaxel formulation is responsible.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Antibiotic resistance pattern and R-plasmids of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus

Our objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose of an escalating dose of ifosfamide in combination with a fixed dose of doxorubicin supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen). Eighteen women with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in a Phase I study of an escalating dose of ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2/day for 5 days-2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days) with doxorubicin 20 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used at 5 microgram/kg on day 6 until hematological recovery. Prophylactic antibiotics were also used. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin was 2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days. The objective response rate was 83% with a complete response rate of 33% (6/18 patients); the median time to treatment failure was 11.5 months. The median survival has not been reached and will exceed 18 months. We concluded that the recommended dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin is 2.5 g/m2/day for 5 days. This combination shows promise in stage IV breast cancer.     

Systemic chemotherapy alone for patients with non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study of the BOMES protocol

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports have suggested that systemic chemotherapy with agents that better cross the blood-brain barrier may result in long term disease remission in some patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. This treatment strategy has the advantage of sparing patients the late neurologic complications from brain irradiation. METHODS: Eligible patients were required to 1) have tissue-proven and measurable non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)- related primary or metastatic CNS lymphoma; 2) have normal hemogram, renal function, and hepatic function; 3) be age < or = 75 years; and 4) have provided informed consent. Patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma or patients who previously had been exposed to nitrosoureas, etoposide, or high dose methotrexate were not eligible. The systemic chemotherapy (BOMES regimen) included carmustine, 65 mg/m2/day, intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1-2; vincristine, 2 mg/day, i.v. on Days 1 and 8; methotrexate, 1.5 g/m2, i.v. on day 15 followed by leucovorin rescue; etoposide, 50 mg/m2/day, i.v. on Days 1-5; and methylprednisolone, 200 mg/day, i.v. on Days 1-7; repeated every 4 weeks (BOMES regimen). Four doses of intrathecal methotrexate were given to patients who had involvement in the cerebrospinal fluid. RESULTS: Between March 1991 and March 1997 a total of 19 patients were enrolled on the study. There were 13 men and 6 women, with a median age of 57 years. Fourteen patients had primary CNS lymphoma and 5 patients had concurrent extra-CNS lymphoma. Nine patients previously had been treated by radiotherapy (four patients), chemotherapy (three patients), or both (two patients). There were 11 complete remissions (CR) (57.9%) and 5 partial remissions (26.3%), with a total remission rate of 84.2%. One patient had had progressive brain lymphoma during systemic chemotherapy with the conventional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone regimen, but achieved CR soon after the regimen was changed to BOMES. The median time to progression of the responders was 6 months. At last follow-up, 4 patients were alive without lymphoma at 10, 47, 64, and 66 months, respectively. There were two treatment-related deaths due to sepsis. Another two patients died of fulminant hepatitis that most likely was chemotherapy-related reactivation of chronic B viral hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe systemic chemotherapy alone may result in long term disease remission in some select patients with non-AIDS-related CNS lymphoma. Further investigation for better protocols is mandatory.     

Association study of schizophrenia and the dopamine D3 receptor gene locus in two independent samples

The outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and bone marrow relapse has been unsatisfactory largely because of failure to prevent subsequent leukemia relapses. Ninety-six patients were enrolled and received vincristine, prednisone, L-asparaginase, and an anthracycline as reinduction therapy. Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive either daunomycin (DNR) or idarubicin (IDR). After achievement of second complete remission (CR2), maintenance chemotherapy included the same anthracycline, IDR or DNR, high-dose cytarabine, and escalating-dose methotrexate. Compared to DNR (45 mg/m2/week x 3), IDR (12.5 mg/m2/week x 3) was associated with prolonged myelosuppression and more frequent serious infections. Halfway through the study, the dose of IDR was reduced to 10 mg/m2. Overall, second remission was achieved in 71% of patients. Reinduction rate was similar for IDR and DNR. Reasons for induction failure differed; none of 15, 1 of 5, and 5 of 7 reinduction failures were due to infection for DNR, IDR (10 mg/m2), and IDR (12.5 mg/m2), respectively. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) was better among patients who received IDR (12.5 mg/m2) (27 +/- 18%) compared to DNR (10 +/- 8%, P = 0.05) and IDR (10 mg/m2) (6 +/- 12%, P = 0.02). However, after 3 years of follow-up, late events in the high-dose IDR group result in a similar EFS to the lower-dose IDR and DNR groups. In conclusion, IDR is an effective agent in childhood ALL. When used weekly at 12.5 mg/m2 during induction, the EFS outcome during the first 2 years of treatment appears better than lower-dose IDR or DNR (45 mg/m2), although this difference was not sustained at longer periods of follow-up. Increased hematopoietic toxicity seen at this dose might be reduced through the use of supportive measures, such as hematopoietins and intestinal decontamination.     

Feasibility of dose-intensive continuous 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Several studies support the belief that the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is related to the dose intensity of the chemotherapy used (expressed in milligrams per square meter per week). Retrospective analyses indicate that the actual delivered dose intensity may correlate more strongly with efficacy than the intended dose delivery. METHODS: A doxorubicin-based adjuvant regimen was studied for breast cancer. It was modeled on the Southwest Oncology Group's regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in that daily oral cyclophosphamide and weekly intravenous 5-fluorouracil were used, but weekly doxorubicin was substituted for methotrexate and administered in both the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting to 29 patients. RESULTS: The actual dose delivery was 1.21-1.24-fold that calculated for the delivered dose in the two other adjuvant regimens using the same three drugs (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) for which this could be determined. This regimen was tolerated well. Toxicity was minimal and consisted largely of expected neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Whether improved dose intensity can be increased further with the use of growth factors or actually confers improved outcomes awaits the results of larger future trials.     

Phase II trial of edatrexate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Edatrexate is an analog of methotrexate which in vitro demonstrated activity against human colon cancer xenografts grown in nude mice. In a phase II trial, 12 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and no prior chemotherapy were treated with Edatrexate 80 mg/m2/week for an initial period of 8 weeks. No objective responses were observed. Edatrexate is inactive against colon cancer at the dose and schedule used in this trial.     

High-dose trimetrexate and minimal-dose leucovorin: a case for selective protection?

Our objective was to find the minimum dose of leucovorin (LV; 5-formyltetrahydrofolate) needed to potentially provide selective protection of normal tissue in patients with tumors resistant to methotrexate (MTX) by virtue of transport during prolonged therapy with high-dose trimetrexate (TMTX). Based upon the known daily requirement for folate, that tumors are often resistant to methotrexate via a transport-based mechanism, and that large doses of trimetrexate can be given with large doses of leucovorin for the treatment of patients with Pneumocystis carinii, a protocol was designed to find the minimum LV dose required to allow the administration of large doses of TMTX. Patients were treated in 28-day cycles consisting of 14 consecutive days of oral TMTX (45 mg/m2 every 12 h), followed by 14 days of rest. The dose of concurrent LV was started at 5 mg/m2 twice daily. Cohorts of patients received successive half doses of LV so long as three consecutive patients had less than or equal to grade 3 toxicity. Ten patients received 29 courses of therapy. The most common toxicities encountered were thrombocytopenia (38%), mucositis (14%), and neutropenia (10%). At a LV dose of 2.5 mg/m2, toxicities were consistently limited to less than or equal to grade 3 and only one episode of grade 4 hematological toxicity. Although there was marked interpatient variability, the minimally effective LV dose for selective protection seems to be 2.5 mg/m2. If tumors are resistant to methotrexate because of decreased transport of drug (and also folate), then the same pharmacological principle used to develop TMTX/LV for the treatment of P. carinii may be applied to treatment of some patients with cancer.     

Escalated dosages of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced urothelial carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE: This multicenter cooperative group phase I/II trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of escalated dosages of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1990 through October 1991, 35 patients with advanced urothelial cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy were treated with escalated dosages of M-VAC (M-VACII). In patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy, standard M-VAC (M-VACI) was administered plus rhG-CSF. For other patients, M-VACII dosages were methotrexate 40 mg/m2 (days 1, 15, and 22), vinblastine 4 mg/m2 (days 2, 15, and 22), doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 (day 2), and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 2). In addition, rhG-CSF was administered at a dosage of 300 micrograms subcutaneously on days 4 to 11. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. For patients who tolerated the first course of therapy, subsequent escalation by 25% of all drugs was performed. RESULTS: Six complete responses and 15 partial responses were observed (60%; 95% confidence interval, 42% to 76%). The median duration of response was 4.6 months, and the median survival time was 9.4 months (range, 0.5 to 23.5+). Twenty-eight of 35 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, including 14 patients who developed fever associated with neutropenia. Eight (23%) early deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: This regimen (M-VACII) with escalated dosages of M-VAC was associated with significant toxicity and had no apparent benefit over M-VACI therapy with regard to complete response rate or survival. Further evaluation of the dose-intensity of the components of this regimen in this disease is likely to be of limited benefit to patients.