"Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus". Correction to Lovibond.

Reports an error in the article, "Facilitation of Instrumental Behavior by a Pavlovian Appetitive Conditioned Stimulus" by Peter F. Lovibond (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1983, Jul, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 225-247)." Part of the second sentence on page 227 was omitted, and the correction is presented here. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1984-08705-001.) In Exp I, 16 New Zealand white rabbits were trained to perform an instrumental head-raising response for sucrose reward. A jaw-movement CR was established to a 2-sec CS by pairing it with sucrose; a control stimulus was unpaired with sucrose. Instrumental responding maintained by a VI 40-sec schedule was enhanced during 10-sec presentations of the paired, but not the unpaired, CS. Responding on a VR 15 schedule was unaffected except on trials on which the pre-CS baseline response rate was low; in such cases the paired CS caused a long-lasting acceleration of responding. Noncontingent presentation of the sucrose reinforcer itself briefly suppressed responding but had no long-term effect. In Exp II (6 Ss), a CS that had been conditioned at a 10-sec duration produced the same pattern of effects as in Exp I, indicating that facilitation resulted from CS presentation rather than from the frustrative effects of nonreinforcement of the CS. In Exp III (16 Ss), an inhibitory CS blocked facilitation by the excitatory CS but did not itself affect instrumental responding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Acquired appetitive responding to intravenous nicotine reflects a Pavlovian conditioned association.

Recent research examining Pavlovian appetitive conditioning has extended the associative properties of nicotine from the unconditioned stimulus or reward to include the role of a conditional stimulus (CS), capable of acquiring the ability to evoke a conditioned response. To date, published research has used presession extravascular injections to examine nicotine as a contextual CS in that appetitive Pavlovian drug discrimination task. Two studies in the current research examined whether a nicotine CS can function discretely, multiple times within a session using passive iv infusions. In Experiment 1, rats readily acquired a discrimination in conditioned responding between nicotine and saline infusions when nicotine was selectively paired with sucrose presentations. In Experiment 2, rats were either trained with nicotine paired with sucrose or explicitly unpaired with sucrose. The results showed that rats trained with explicitly unpaired nicotine and sucrose did not increase dipper entries after the infusions. Nicotine was required to be reliably paired with sucrose for control of conditioned responding to develop. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to tobacco addiction, learning theory, and pharmacology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.

Investigated the directed skeletal movements of 21 female White Carneaux pigeons toward signals of food or no food in 3 experiments. Ss approached and pecked an illuminated key that was positively correlated with food delivery, and positioned themselves relatively far from an illuminated key that was negatively correlated with food delivery. Key illuminations alone, random presentations of key illuminations and food, and backward pairings of key illuminations and food did not produce keypecking or consistent approach-withdrawal. Therefore, directed skeletal behavior-often believed to be conditioned and maintained primarily or exclusively by operant procedures-also emerges on Pavlovian procedures. Several kinds of alternative explanations (e.g., conditioned reinforcement effects, and stimulus substitution) for these phenomena are considered, and some potential implications for operant discrimination learning are briefly explored. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli.

Two experiments used rats to examine the transfer of control of a stimulus to a new instrumental response. That transfer was successful to the degree that the stimulus and the response shared a common outcome. The transfer was more substantial, however, when the stimulus signaled the availability of that outcome for another instrumental response compared with signaling its occurrence in a Pavlovian manner. That result suggests that the stimulus–outcome associations formed during instrumental training are not reducible to a Pavlovian association. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (see record 1977-12147-001) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.

Two experiments, with 280 Sprague-Dawley rats, demonstrated unblocking in an appetitive conditioning preparation. One stimulus, A, was first paired with either a low-value reinforcer (1 food pellet) or a high-value reinforcer (1 food pellet followed by 2 more food pellets). A 2nd stimulus, X, was then added to A, and the compound was reinforced with either the high- or low-value reinforcer. Conditioning to X was blocked if the same reinforcer was used in both phases of the experiment, but there was substantial conditioning to X when the reinforcer value was shifted either up or down when X was introduced. Exp I demonstrated this unblocking phenomenon using a design that minimized the potential contribution of generalization decrement. Exp II examined the effects of a variety of posttraining manipulations on conditioned responding to the added X cue after unblocking procedures. Among Ss that received downshifts in reinforcer value when X was introduced, responding was affected by several posttraining manipulations, including changes in context value. Those manipulations had smaller effects on the responding of Ss that received upshifts in reinforcer value and no effects on responding in control conditions. Findings are considered in relation to the model of conditioning outlined by R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner (1972). (40 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.

Examined the notion of conditioned inhibition and suggests a definition in terms of the learned ability of a stimulus to control a response tendency opposed to excitation. 2 techniques of measuring inhibition are outlined: (1) the summation procedure in which an inhibitor reduces the response that would normally be elicited by another stimulus, and (2) the retardation of acquisition procedure in which an inhibitor is retarded in the acquisition of an excitatory CR. Examples of the use of these procedures are given for a variety of UCS modalities. Several possible operations for generating conditioned inhibitors are reviewed: extinction following excitatory conditioning, discriminative conditioning, arrangement of a negative correlation between CS and a UCS, use of an extended CS-UCS interval, and presentation of a stimulus in conjunction with UCS termination. These operations suggest that conditioned inhibitors are not generated either by simple extinction procedures or by pairing a stimulus with UCS termination. By contrast, for both salivary and fear conditioning the other procedures do appear to generate inhibitors. Most of the procedures generating conditioned inhibitors can be described as arranging a negatively correlated CS and UCS. (2 p. ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Disconnection of the basolateral amygdala complex and nucleus accumbens impairs appetitive Pavlovian second-order conditioned responses.

There is considerable evidence that the basolateral complex of the amygdala (ABL) is involved in learning about the motivational value of otherwise neutral stimuli. The authors examined the role in this function of the ABL and one of its major efferent structures, the nucleus accumbens. Male Long-Evans rats received either sham, ipsilaterally. or contralaterally placed unilateral lesions of the ABL and accumbens and were trained in an appetitive Pavlovian second-order conditioning task. Sham-lesioned and ipsilaterally lesioned rats acquired the task normally, but contralaterally lesioned rats, in which the ABL and accumbens were functionally disconnected, failed to acquire second-order conditioned responses (although they did acquire second-order conditioned orienting responses). The results suggest that the ABL and accumbens are part of a system critical for processing information about learned motivational value. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulus control of avoidance behavior in rats following differential or nondifferential Pavlovian training along dimensions of the conditioned stimulus.

Assigned 36 male albino Holtzman rats, following 2-way avoidance training with an auditory CS, to 1 of 6 Pavlovian manipulations: discrimination or equivalence training along frequency or intensity dimensions, nominal single stimulus training, or unsignalled shocks only. Subsequently, Ss received separate generalization tests when frequency and/or intensity were varied. Intradimensional discrimination training tended to steepen generalization gradient and resulted in a peak shift away from the negative CS (safety signal) within the frequency continuum. Pseudodiscrimination equivalence training typically reduced stimulus control, even when training and test stimuli were not along the same dimension. These modifications of avoidance generalization gradients through interpolated noncontingent training provide additional evidence of the transfer of Pavlovian control to instrumental behavior. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of Pavlovian conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus pairings during avoidance response-prevention trials in rats.

Response prevention (blocking) has been shown to hasten extinction of an instrumental avoidance response. One interpretation suggests that the facilitation effect is mediated by Pavlovian fear reduction during conditioned stimulus exposure on blocked trials. To test the fear-reduction hypothesis 30 male Holtzman albino rats received either a typical blocking treatment, blocking with shock, or extinction alone. Results indicate that blocking with the UCS was as effective as regular blocking in facilitating extinction of avoidance. An ancillary part of the experiment to assess the effectiveness of response prevention in 30 immature Ss showed that blocking did not facilitate extinction with the weanlings. Findings suggest that facilitated extinction is not solely attributable to Pavlovian fear reduction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pavlovian second-order conditioned analgesia.

Three experiments, with 118 Sprague-Dawley rats, assessed conditioned analgesia in a Pavlovian 2nd-order conditioning procedure by using inhibition of responding to thermal stimulation as an index of pain sensitivity. In Exp I, Ss receiving 2nd-order conditioning showed longer response latencies during a test of pain sensitivity in the presence of the 2nd-order conditioned stimulus (CS) than Ss receiving appropriate control procedures. Exp II found that extinction of the 1st-order CS had no effect on established 2nd-order conditioned analgesia. Exp III evaluated the effects of post 2nd-order conditioning pairings of subcutaneous morphine sulfate (10–20 mg/kg) and the shock unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS). Ss receiving paired morphine–shock presentations showed significantly shorter response latencies during a hot-plate test of pain sensitivity in the presence of the 2nd-order CS than did Ss receiving various control procedures; 2nd-order analgesia was attenuated. Data extend the associative account of conditioned analgesia to 2nd-order conditioning situations and are discussed in terms of the mediation of both 1st- and 2nd-order analgesia by an association between the CS and a representation or expectancy of the UCS, which may directly activate endogenous pain inhibition systems. (52 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.

Examined 2 procedures with potential for reducing Pavlovian conditioned inhibition in 4 experiments with 72 male Sprague-Dawley rats. The 1st, simple nonreinforced presentation, was suggested by a theory which has been successful with data from the acquisition of conditioned inhibition. However, nonreinforced presentation of a stimulus, either after conditioned inhibition training or intermixed with such training, failed to produce any loss of the inhibition controlled by that stimulus. The 2nd procedure involved removing the negative correlation between inhibitor and reinforcement. When this correlation was altered, in such a way as to continue UCS presentation, loss of inhibition occurred. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: Conditioned stimulus preexposure disrupts Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but not explicitly unpaired inhibition.

Three conditioned lick-suppression experiments with rats examined the effects of pretraining exposure to the conditioned stimulus (CS) on behavior indicative of conditioned inhibition. After CS-preexposure treatment, subjects received either Pavlovian conditioned inhibition training or explicitly impaired inhibition training with the preexposed CS. The inhibitory status of the CS was then assessed with a retardation (Experiment 1) or a summation (Experiment 2) test. Experiment 3 controlled for the unconditioned stimulus-preexposure effect being a potential confound in Experiments 1 and 2. As predicted by the comparator hypothesis (R. R. Miller & L. D. Matzel, 1988), the CS–context association that developed during the CS-preexposure phase disrupted the expression of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but not the expression of explicitly impaired inhibition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Facilitation of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning by d-amphetamine in the shell, but not the core, of the nucleus accumbens.

The effects of postsession d-amphetamine within subregions of the ventral and dorsal striatum on appetitive Pavlovian learning were assessed. Rats acquired a conditioned approach response on presentation of a stimulus predictive of 10% sucrose solution (unconditioned stimulus [US]), but not during equally frequent presentations of a stimulus uncorrelated with the US. In Experiment 1, postsession d-amphetarnine infusions enhanced acquisition of conditioned responding, with no effect on control measures. In Experiment 2, rats received postsession d-amphetamine in the accumbens shell or core. Shell infusions facilitated conditioning; core infusions did not. In Experiment 3, dorsomedial striatal infusions of d-amphetamine also were ineffective. In sum, dopaminergic activation within the shell, but not the core, of the nucleus accumbens facilitates the acquisition of a Pavlovian association. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Double dissociation of the behavioural effects of R(+) 7-OH-DPAT infusions in the central and basolateral amygdala nuclei upon Pavlovian and instrumental conditioned appetitive behaviours

Dopaminergic cell bodies located within the ventral mesencephalon innervate the amygdaloid complex, a region critically involved in the attribution of affective significance to environmental stimuli. Recently, we have shown that post-session intra-amygdala administration of a D3 dopamine receptor agonist enhances selectively the acquisition of an appetitive conditioned response. In the present study, we have investigated the potential involvement of the central nucleus and the basolateral nuclei of the amygdala in mediating this effect. Thus, rats were trained to associate an arbitrary stimulus (CS+) with the availability of 10% sucrose reward. Post-session infusions of the D3 receptor-preferring agonist, R(+) 7-OH-DPAT, were made into either the central nucleus or basolateral nuclei. Acquisition of a conditioned approach response was enhanced by R(+) 7-OH-DPAT infusions within the central nucleus, but not within the basolateral nuclei. Drug infusions into either region failed to affect approach behaviour elicited by presentation of a control stimulus (CS-), explicitly unpaired with sucrose reward. The effects of pre-test infusions of R(+) 7-OH-DPAT on the instrumental properties of the stimuli were then determined. Rats were presented with two novel levers, depression of one lever resulted in presentation of the CS+, while presentation of the CS- was contingent upon depression of the other lever. Rates of response upon each lever as well as the ability of the conditioned stimuli subsequently to elicit conditioned approach behaviour were recorded. Data revealed a double dissociation of the effects of R(+) 7-OH-DPAT on the expression of the Pavlovian and instrumental properties of the reward-related stimulus. Thus, within the central nucleus R(+) 7-OH-DPAT dose-dependently attenuated expression of the conditioned approach response, but had no effect upon instrumental responding maintained by the conditioned reward. In contrast, within the basolateral nuclei, R(+) 7-OH-DPAT had no effect upon expression of conditioned approach behaviour, but abolished selectively the ability of the reward-associated stimulus to support the acquisition of a novel instrumental response. Hence, these data indicate that distinct regions of the amygdaloid complex process distinct aspects of conditioned appetitive behaviours.     

Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control in a human learning task.

Pavlovian learning tasks have been widely used as tools to understand basic cognitive and emotional processes in humans. The present studies investigated one particular task, Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT), with human participants in an effort to examine potential cognitive and emotional effects of Pavlovian cues upon instrumentally trained performance. In two experiments, subjects first learned two separate instrumental response-outcome relationships (i.e., R1-O1 and R2-O2) and then were exposed to various stimulus-outcome relationships (i.e., S1-O1, S2-O2, S3-O3, and S4-) before the effects of the Pavlovian stimuli on instrumental responding were assessed during a non-reinforced test. In Experiment 1, instrumental responding was established using a positive-reinforcement procedure, whereas in Experiment 2, a quasi-avoidance learning task was used. In both cases, the Pavlovian stimuli exerted selective control over instrumental responding, whereby S1 and S2 selectively elevated the instrumental response with which it shared an outcome. In addition, in Experiment 2, S3 exerted a nonselective transfer of control effect, whereby both responses were elevated over baseline levels. These data identify two ways, one specific and one general, in which Pavlovian processes can exert control over instrumental responding in human learning paradigms, suggesting that this method may serve as a useful tool in the study of basic cognitive and emotional processes in human learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the control over behavior by Pavlovian conditioned stimuli in rats.

To investigate the contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to stimulus-reward learning, rats with lesions of peri- and postgenual ACC were tested on a variety of Pavlovian conditioning tasks. Lesioned rats learned to approach a food alcove during a stimulus predicting food, and responded normally for conditioned reinforcement. They also exhibited normal conditioned freezing and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, yet were impaired at autoshaping. To resolve this apparent discrepancy, a further task was developed in which approach to the food alcove was under the control of 2 stimuli, only 1 of which was followed by reward. Lesioned rats were impaired, approaching during both stimuli. It is suggested that the ACC is not critical for stimulus-reward learning per se, but is required to discriminate multiple stimuli on the basis of their association with reward. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioned reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior with a discrete compound stimulus classically conditioned with intravenous cocaine.

The present study investigated the ability of a light and tone (LT) compound stimulus paired with cocaine infusions to reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine in the presence or absence of the LT during daily 3-hr sessions (maintenance). During Maintenance Days 5 and 10, rats underwent classical conditioning, whereby passive cocaine infusions were paired with either short-delayed, random, or no presentations of an LT. After extinction sessions, rats underwent test sessions in which the LT was presented in a noncontingent or response-contingent manner to measure conditioned cocaine-seeking behavior. The results demonstrated that response-contingent LT presentations significantly increased cocaine-seeking behavior and that the LT trained in a classical conditioning format transferred to an operant secondary reinforcer. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)