The effects of glossy screens on the acceptance of flat‐panel displays

Abstract— The TCO requirements provide well‐known and recognized quality labels for displays. For these requirements to remain useful, they must continuously be reviewed and updated when necessary. The study described here was performed in response to the market trend of designing flat‐panel displays and notebooks with glare panels. The purpose of this study was to investigate subjective responses to display screens of different gloss levels for office workers working on different tasks under normal office‐lighting conditions. The study consisted of three parts, one where the users should set an acceptable reflex level, one where the user should rate their disturbance on a category scale, and one where the visual acuity of the users were investigated whether they were affected by glare or not. The results show that increasing gloss and increasing luminance levels had negative effects on the acceptance and the disturbance of reflexes. There were statistically significant differences in the acceptance and the disturbance levels between screens with low gloss and screens with high gloss, which suggests that screens with the highest gloss levels should be avoided. The study did not show an effect on the performance based on acuity testing.     

Cross‐talk acceptability in natural still images for different (auto)stereoscopic display technologies

Abstract— One of the most annoying distortions in (auto)stereoscopic displays is probably cross‐talk, visible as double edges, which is mainly caused by an imperfect separation of left‐ and right‐eye images. For different types of three‐dimensional (3‐D) displays, cross‐talk is caused by different origins, which could result in different levels of perceived image distortion. To evaluate the influence of (auto)stereoscopic display technology on cross‐talk perception, optical measurements and subjective assessments were performed with three different types of 3‐D displays. It is shown with natural still images that the 3‐D display technology with the lowest luminance and contrast level tolerates the highest level of cross‐talk, while still maintaining an acceptable image‐quality level.     

Calibration of diagnostic monitors: Theoretical determination of optimal luminance settings

Abstract— Common practice today is to calibrate diagnostic monitors according to the gray‐scale standard display function (GSDF) described in DICOM part 14. However, the GSDF is based on the assumption of variable adaptation of the human‐visual system (HVS). It is well known that the HVS adapts to the average quantity of light falling on the retina, so‐called fixed adaptation. For the luminance setting of a monitor, the effect of fixed adaptation is of interest. The wider the luminance range of the monitor, the larger the number of available just‐noticeable differences (JNDs). However, at the same time, the sensitivity of the HVS to the average contrast change is decreased since it occurs at a luminance level further away from the adaptation luminance. A computer program was therefore written which takes the effect of the fixed adaptation into account by determining the number of effective JNDs for a given luminance setting of a monitor. The probability of detecting each change in presentation value is then calculated from the distribution of effective JNDs. Based on the assumptions implemented in the program, it is shown that for monitors calibrated according to the GSDF, the optimal luminance setting for visualizing the image information in the best possible way is to use the entire available luminance range.     

Survey of actual viewing conditions at home and appropriate luminance of LCD‐TV screens

Abstract— To understand actual viewing conditions at home is important for TV design. And the preferred luminance level of LCD TVs under actual viewing conditions is also important in order to obtain both good picture quality and low power consumption. The actual viewing conditions of households and the preferred luminance levels was investigated. In a field test of 83 households, the display luminance, screen illuminance, and viewing locations were measured on site. In laboratory experiments, young and elderly subjects adjusted the luminance of an LCD‐TV screen to their preferred levels under different screen illuminance levels, angular screen sizes, and average luminance levels (ALL) of the images. As a result, two equations, which represent the preferred luminance level of LCD‐TV screens corresponding to different viewing conditions for young and elderly subjects were obtained. When the ALL of the images was 25% and the screen illuminance and angular screen size were set at 100 lx and 20°, respectively, the preferred luminance was 1 60 cd/m² for the young subjects and 248 cd/m² for the elderly subjects. By using the setting of the preferred luminance of an LCD TV under actual viewing conditions, it is possible to conserve energy consumption.     

Characterizing image quality of autostereoscopic displays by using the maximum luminance at each viewing position

A metric of the 3D image quality of autostereoscopic displays based on optical measurements is proposed. This metric uses each view's luminance contrast, which is defined as the ratio of maximum luminance at each viewing position to total luminance at that position. Conventional metrics of the autostereoscopic display based on crosstalk, which uses “wanted” and “unwanted” lights. However, in case of the multiple‐views‐type autostereoscopic displays, it is difficult to distinguish exactly which lights are wanted lights and which are unwanted lights. This paper assumes that the wanted light has a maximum luminance at the good stereoscopic viewing position, and the unwanted light also has a maximum luminance at the worst pseudo‐stereoscopic viewing position. By using the maximum luminance that is indexed by view number of the autostereoscopic display, the proposed method enables characterizing stereoscopic viewing conditions without using wanted/unwanted light. A 3D image quality metric called “stereo luminance contrast,” the average of both eyes' contrast, is proposed. The effectiveness of the proposed metric is confirmed by the results of optical measurement analyses of different types of autostereoscopic displays, such as the two‐view, scan‐backlight, multi‐view, and integral.     

Structural similarity-based object tracking in multimodality surveillance videos

This paper addresses the problem of object tracking in video sequences for surveillance applications by using a recently proposed structural similarity-based image distance measure. Multimodality surveillance videos pose specific challenges to tracking algorithms, due to, for example, low or variable light conditions and the presence of spurious or camouflaged objects. These factors often cause undesired luminance and contrast variations in videos produced by infrared sensors (due to varying thermal conditions) and visible sensors (e.g., the object entering shadowy areas). Commonly used colour and edge histogram-based trackers often fail in such conditions. In contrast, the structural similarity measure reflects the distance between two video frames by jointly comparing their luminance, contrast and spatial characteristics and is sensitive to relative rather than absolute changes in the video frame. In this work, we show that the performance of a particle filter tracker is improved significantly when the structural similarity-based distance is applied instead of the conventional Bhattacharyya histogram-based distance. Extensive evaluation of the proposed algorithm is presented together with comparisons with colour, edge and mean-shift trackers using real-world surveillance video sequences from multimodal (infrared and visible) cameras.     

Luminance effects influencing perception of 3‐D TV imagery

Abstract— This study investigates whether screen luminance or ambient illumination has a significant effect on the perception of 3‐D TV imagery for static images and dynamic films. Two types of stimuli were shown on a multi‐view stereoscopic display: the static image, which included computer‐generated and photographic images, and dynamic film, which contained real‐life and animation images. In each treatment with a different level of screen luminance, subjects completed psychophysical and physiological measurements and subjective comfort evaluations. The results showed that when subjects viewed 3‐D static images, the ambient illumination affected psychophysical visual fatigue and screen luminance had a significant effect on subjective comfort evaluation and visual discrimination performance. However, when subjects viewed 3‐D dynamic films, screen luminance was the major factor causing psychophysical visual fatigue, and ambient illumination significantly affected subjective comfort evaluation. The outcomes contribute to knowledge concerning the suitable viewing conditions for the 3‐D viewing experience. Future work will explore the intolerance threshold of the lowest display luminance or the effect of decomposition of the screen on other physiological measurements.     

Effect of blue light from LCD on VDT work: Experiment using blue light reduction function LCD

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the blue light from the visual display terminal (VDT) on visual search tasks. We assessed the quantity of the blue light from medical imaging diagnoses (medical‐grade) liquid‐crystal display (LCD) and general (personal computer‐grade) LCD for the VDT work, both equipped with the blue light reduction function. Then, we measured the visibility of display by evaluating the correct answer rate and reaction time of visual search tasks. The quantity of the blue light was proportional to the luminance of the display. When the blue light reduction function was used during the VDT work, the blue light at the peak wavelength was reduced by about 56%. Though the luminance of the display reduced, the visibility of the display was not decreased. These findings suggest that the blue light reduction on the LCD could work efficiently in the VDT work, maintaining the visibility of the display.     

Optimization of operating parameters of video display units in text reading task: Luminance contrast,viewing distance,and character size

Abstract— The purpose of this study is to determine the reading performance of operators on a desktop computer. The effects of luminance contrast, viewing distance, and character size on the speed of reading were investigated. The luminance contrast between the background and character was varied while color contrast was held near‐constant. Stimuli with different levels of character size, viewing distance, and luminance contrast were considered while assessing the readability performance. The luminance contrast between the background and character (0.01, 0.15, and 1.00), character sizes (0.2, 1.5, and 4°), and viewing distance (40, 50, and 60 cm) were used, and the performance of the operators were recorded in terms of words per minutes (WPM). Standard workplace design recommendations to position the center of the visual display terminal (VDT) 15° and 40° below horizontal eye level were used for the visually intensive readability task. An orthogonal array, the signal‐to‐noise (S/N) ratio, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to investigate the above‐mentioned operating parameters to determine the optimum readability performance. The results indicated that performance was better at a 15° viewing angle as compared to a 40° viewing angle.     

Evaluation of moving‐line contrast degradation without motion

Abstract— A method for evaluation of the contrast of moving step‐grating patterns under smooth‐pursuit eye‐tracking conditions without imaging data acquisition and image analysis is introduced. Periodic optical responses of the display to a set of simple driving signals have been recorded at a fixed location, and the luminance vs. time data has been evaluated to obtain two types of contrast for characterization of the dynamical performance of the display under test: the frame‐convoluted contrast and the frame‐integrated contrast. The relation of this characterization with respect to modulation transfer functions from impulse responses and to the dynamic modulation transfer function from sine‐gratings is explained and discussed. The approach described here provides a detailed and comprehensive characterization of the dynamical properties of electronic displays including both extreme cases of step‐response and impulse‐response with quantities that are related to visual perception. With this type of evaluation, the visual resolution of displays can be described by the same characteristics in the static and the dynamic case. The method is attractive due to limited instrumental efforts and the transparent method of evaluation.     

Efficacy of global dimming backlight and high‐contrast liquid crystal panel for high‐dynamic‐range displays

Using an RGB organic light‐emitting diode display to emulate liquid crystal display systems, we examined the efficacy of different global dimming strategies for cinematic content. A global dimming solution with smoothed transitions was preferred over solutions using a static backlight level or the highly aggressive frame‐by‐frame backlight adjustment scheme. We compared two such smoothing approaches, one making use of causal data, and another using future information (which could be available via latency or dynamic metadata) and did observe some opportunities for an improved experience, but found the causal data to be a competitive approach. We also evaluated the importance of native panel contrast and how global dimming compares to local dimming approaches. For most content tested, a global dimming display with a high‐contrast liquid crystal panel was judged as being equivalent or more preferred to a full‐array local dimming display with a low‐contrast panel. These results build on the existing evidence that native panel contrast remains one of the strongest predictors of high‐dynamic‐range image quality even as backlight technologies continue to improve.     

Filters on computer displays - effects on legibility, performance and comfort

The hypothesis is that using a contrast-enhancing filter (CEF) on a computer display will improve display legibility, reading speed and visual comfort. Twenty subjects performed reading tasks, letter counting tasks, and legibility measurements on eight display conditions: a cathode ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) matched for size and luminance - each at high luminance, with two different CEFs and a lower luminance to match one of the CEFs. The CEFs decreased both luminance and contrast when applied to the displays with the brightness set high, although the contrast was better with the filters compared to a matched luminance display without a filter. The legibility measurements support the positive effect of the CEFs due to improved contrast but the larger negative effect due to reduction in luminance results in a net loss of legibility. Performance on the reading and letter counting tasks was not improved with the CEFs.     

Black‐level offset: Characterization and correction

Abstract— The correct setting of the black level is an important step in the (re)calibration of an electronic display. This study looks at the consequences of black‐level offset, the possibilities for display characterization with offset, offset correction, and the ability of average untrained users to visually correct the black‐level setting with the contrast and brightness controls on the display. In an experiment, 32 subjects were asked to optimally set the black level according to two types of instructions (short and extensive, between subjects) under two levels of illumination (low and office, between subjects) for two types of displays (CRTs and LCDs, within subjects). Most subjects were not able to set the black level near optimal for either display, with any combination of instruction and illumination level. The LCD did not have an optimal black level. For the CRT, optimal black level did not provide minimal differences with the sRGB standard tone reproduction curve.     

A new driving method introducing a display period for AMOLEDs

Abstract— We have proposed an Advanced‐Clamped‐Inverter driving method for the fabrication of AMOLEDs, in which one frame period is divided into an addressing period and a display period. This driving method enables the AMOLEDs to produce excellent moving images without motion blur and false pixels, and has peak‐luminance characteristics because of its unique light‐emission scheme of the OLED elements. Good inter‐pixel uniformity was also achieved in a previous clamped‐inverter driving method. We fabricated AMOLEDs and experimentally confirmed their characteristics.     

Determination of luminance distribution of autostereoscopic 3D displays through calculation of angular profile

Abstract— The luminance distribution of autostereoscopic 3‐D displays using the parallax‐barrier method was simulated by two different calculation methods. The first method directly calculates the total luminance distribution by summing light rays coming from different positions on the imaging display through a parallax barrier at each eye position. The second method first calculates the angular distribution of light rays coming from the imaging display through a parallax barrier and then derives the spatial luminance distribution for each eye position. The two methods resulted in an equivalent distribution. Yet, the second method outperforms the first method in terms of calculating the speed and versatility.     

Visual experience of quality degradation when viewing computer and notebook displays from an oblique angle

Abstract— This study focused on evaluating the user experience of the viewing‐angle‐dependent quality of computer and notebook displays. The tests were performed in a test lab using a notebook with a prismatic display and a computer monitor with a conventional LCD. The notebook display was tilted and turned during an image‐quality test and tilted during an acuity test. On the computer monitor, the turn and tilt was simulated in the image‐quality test, for checking the TCO requirements. The results from the image‐quality test show that the parameter used in the TCO requirement, luminance ratio, would be a reasonable predictor of image quality. However, the experiment with the notebook display shows that, in general, this is not the case, especially for larger viewing angles where the physical characteristics do not show a gradual variation in luminance. Therefore, the luminance ratio in TCO requirements shall be used with caution. In addition, the results for the notebook display show that the visual acu ity decreased faster with increasing viewing angle than predicted from the luminance decrease alone. This means that it will be harder to resolve small details and will, therefore, have a negative influence on the visual ergonomics.     

Optical performance characterization of flexible mobile displays

The high interest in the display industry to produce curved or flexible displays for mobile, wearable, and television markets has raised concerns on the performance of displays in their bent state. Flexible display technologies have been developed for this purpose, but their optical characteristics have not been previously reported at various degrees of curvature. The measurement of flexible displays is possible only with special measurement arrangements using common display characterization devices. A conoscope with a working distance of 15 mm was used to demonstrate the curvature dependence of luminance, viewing angle, and color coordinates of the white point of a flexible active‐matrix organic light‐emitting display. The results show that the effect of curvature on the optical characteristics of the display is most evident at the smallest measured bending radii of +/?50 mm and that the effects are most visible when viewing the bent ends of the display, from the central normal vantage point, with uniform curvature along the display.     

Effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe shape characteristics

The effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe (effective visual field) shape characteristics was studied using three levels of luminance contrast with combinations of positive and negative polarities. The binocular effective visual field for a detection task, with a peripherally presented target (V) embedded in a homogeneous competing background (Xs), was mapped on 24 imaginary axes passing through the fixation point. The results showed that visual lobes mapped using positive polarity were statistically larger in area, rounder and more regular in shape than those for negative polarity. The medium contrast condition lobes were more symmetric and regular than low contrast condition lobes, and lobe area and perimeter increased with increasing luminance contrast ratio. Under the interaction of positive polarity and high luminance contrast, visual lobes were found to be larger, smoother and rounder. The high level of luminance and contrast however resulted in a higher degree of visual discomfort. The results indicated that positive polarity and contrast of medium (26:1) to high (41:1) levels are possible display settings for better visual lobe characteristics and better anticipated search performance. Practitioner Summary: The effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe shape characteristics was examined with uniform stimulus materials in this study. The results help to identify the optimum display settings for luminance contrast and display polarity to enhance lobe shape characteristics and hence search performance in industrial inspection tasks.     

Vision with a scanning laser display: comparison of flicker sensitivity to a CRT

Laser scanning displays allow for large depth-of-focus, reduced optical aberrations, and high luminance. However, scanned laser light images have no phosphor persistence. Psychophysical tests with a 3-color laser display showed that flicker thresholds were nearly equal with a laser display relative to the CRT when both were matched in luminance, resolution, frame rate, and similar chromaticity. The threshold ratio was 1.14 (range 0.7–1.6). Differences in flicker sensitivity between displays were significantly related to the absolute energy at the cornea irrespective of the subjective luminance match. Flicker sensitivity was not enhanced by a laser scanning display without image persistence.     

The advantage of positive text-background polarity is due to high display luminance

Reading text from computer screens is better when text is printed in dark letters on light background (positive polarity) than when it is printed in light letters on dark background (negative polarity). An experiment is presented that tests whether this positive polarity advantage is due to the fact that overall display luminance is typically higher for positive than for negative polarity displays. To this end, text-background polarity and display luminance were manipulated independently. No positive polarity advantage was observed when overall display luminance of positive and negative polarity displays was equivalent. There was only an effect of display luminance, with better performance for the higher-luminance displays. This suggests that the positive polarity advantage is in fact due to the typically higher luminance of positive polarity displays. Readability of text presented on computer screens (e.g. on websites) is better when the overall display luminance level is high, as in positive polarity displays (dark letters on light background). Display polarity per se does not affect readability.