Phase II trial of paclitaxel by 24-hour continuous infusion for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Southwest Oncology Group trial 9246

PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) recently conducted a multiinstitutional phase II trial to determine the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, toxicities, and progression-free and overall survivals of patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) treated with a 24-hour continuous infusion of paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with relapsed NHL who had received minimal prior therapy (one prior chemotherapy regimen for intermediate- to high-grade NHL [44 patients] or one or two prior regimens for low-grade NHL [22 patients]) were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine and then treated with continuous intravenous infusion paclitaxel over 24 hours every 21 days. RESULTS: Eleven of 66 patients (17%) achieved rigorously documented objective remissions, including two CRs (3%) and nine PRs (14%). In addition, another five patients (8%) achieved apparent PRs on a single computed tomographic (CT) scan. Responses were brief, lasting a median of 3 months (5 months for indolent lymphomas and 3 months for intermediate- to high-grade lymphomas). Grade 4 or 5 granulocytopenia was the only common serious toxicity, and occurred in 42 of 66 patients (64%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel is generally well tolerated when given as a continuous infusion of 175 mg/m2 over 24 hours, despite predictable granulocytopenia. However, single-agent paclitaxel has modest clinical efficacy compared with other available treatments for relapsed NHL.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel: a 3-hour infusion versus a 24-hour infusion

The present study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of paclitaxel between Phase I trials of 3- and 24-h infusions and to determine the most informative pharmacokinetic parameter to describe the PD. Twenty-seven patients were treated in a Phase I study of paclitaxel by a 3-h infusion at one of six doses: 105, 135, 180, 210, 240, and 270 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from all patients. Paclitaxel concentrations were measured in the plasma and urine using HPLC. The pharmacokinetics and PD were compared with those of a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by a 24-h schedule previously performed. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel by a 3-h infusion was determined to be 240 mg/m2. The major toxicities were granulocytopenia, neuromuscular toxicities, and hypotension. Apparent differences in pharmacodynamic relationships for the change in granulocytes with dose, peak concentration, and areas under the concentration versus time curve were observed between the 3- and 24-h schedules. However, the relationship between the duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM and the change in granulocytes could be fitted to the same sigmoid maximum effect model in either schedule (P < 0.01). There were no clear relationships between peripheral neuropathy or hypotension and any pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetics and PD of paclitaxel were schedule dependent. The duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM could be a common pharmacokinetic parameter predicting granulocytopenia for both schedules.     

Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of 96-hour paclitaxel and daily oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more hormonal therapies and a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 through 4 of each 21-day cycle, together with daily oral EMP 600 mg/m2/d, continuously. RESULTS: Four of nine patients with measurable disease had objective responses (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) in liver (two patients) or nodes (two patients) of 2, 6, 8, and 20 months' duration. Of 25 assessable patients with metastases limited to bone, 14 had a > or = 50% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level sustained for at least 6 weeks and seven had a > or = 80% decline. Overall, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with elevated pretreatment PSA levels had a > or = 50% decline of PSA and nine (28.1%) had a > or = 80% decrease. The main toxicities (> or = grade 2) were nausea, fluid retention, and fatigue, which occurred in 33%, 33%, and 24.2% of patients. Median time to progression, based on increasing PSA level and other clinical criteria, was 22.5 weeks. The estimated median overall survival time is 69 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of EMP and 96-hour paclitaxel is an active regimen for patients with HRPC. These results further support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function by complementary mechanisms.     

Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion on weekly basis, without interruption, to patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received prior therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer received sustained weekly paclitaxel therapy at an initial dose of 100 mg/m2 until disease progression. Prior therapy included adjuvant only (n=17), metastatic only (n=7), or both (n=6). Eighteen patients had received prior anthracycline therapy, 12 of whom had demonstrated progression of disease within 12 months of it. All patients were assessable for efficacy; 29 patients were assessable for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies of paclitaxel were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 469 weekly paclitaxel infusions were administered to 30 patients (median, 14 infusions/patient). The median delivered dose-intensity was 91 mg/m2/wk (range, 80 to 108). The overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 72%), with 10% complete responses (CRs) and 43% partial responses (PRs). Median response duration was 7.5 months (range, 2 to 11+). Responses were observed in nine of 18 (50%) patients with prior anthracycline therapy, including six of 12 (50%) with disease progression on anthracycline within 1 year (three of four within 6 months). Therapy was well tolerated and remarkable for a lack of overall and cumulative myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients; febrile neutropenia was not observed. Peripheral neuropathy prohibited dose escalation above 100 mg/m2, and grade 3 neuropathy was observed in two of 21 patients at < or = 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel therapy is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Weekly therapy should be considered as a current clinical option for these patients and should be incorporated into future comparative clinical trials.     

Phase II study of 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer

Paclitaxel has clinical activity in non-small cell lung cancer, with response rates of 21 and 24% in a 24-h infusion. Recent clinical studies have shown that a 3-h infusion of the drug with premedication did not result in hypersensitivity reactions, and that neutropenia was milder in the 3-h than in the 24-h schedule. In this Phase II study, we tried to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel given over 3 h in patients with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, we attempted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug. Paclitaxel was administered i.v. over 3 h at a dose of 210 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with premedication of dexamethasone, ranitidine, and diphenhydramine. Heparinized blood samples were obtained from 12 patients for pharmacokinetic studies. Twenty-three (38%) of 60 assessable patients achieved a partial response, with a median duration of 3.2 (range, 2.3-11.1) months. The median survival for all patients was 11.2 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 48%. Thirty (50%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia. Nonhematological toxicities were mild, except for pulmonary toxicity in one (1.7%) patient who required mechanical ventilatory support for 4 days. The duration of the paclitaxel concentration above 0.1 microM correlated well with the percentage of decrease in the absolute neutrophil count. In conclusion, a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel was safe and probably not less effective than a 24-h infusion.     

Short-course induction chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: This study assessed toxicity, tumor response, disease control, and survival after short-course induction chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-five patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma received 12-day induction therapy of a 96-hour continuous infusion of cisplatin (20 mg/m2 per day), 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice daily) to a dose of 30 Gy. Surgical resection was scheduled for 4 weeks later. Postoperatively, a second identical course of chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy (30 to 33 Gy) was given. RESULTS: Induction toxicity resulted in hospitalization of 18 (40%) patients for neutropenic fever. No induction deaths occurred. Of 40 (89%) patients who underwent thoracotomy, resection for cure was possible in 32 (71%) patients. Pathologic response was noted in 21 (47%) patients, and 14 (31%) were downstaged to mediastinal node negative (stage 0, I, or II). At a median follow-up of 19 months, 24 patients were alive, 10 with recurrent disease. Of 21 deaths, 16 were from recurrent disease, three were from treatment, and two were unrelated. Recurrent disease was distant in 21 patients, distant and locoregional in 2, and locoregional in 3. The Kaplan-Meier projected 24-month survival is 49%. Projected 24-month survival is 61% for stage IIIA, 17% for stage IIIB (p = 0.035); 84% for pathologic responders, 22% for nonresponders (p<0.001); 83% for downstaged patients (stage 0, I, or II), 33% for those not downstaged (p = 0.005); and 63% for resectable patients, 14% for unresectable patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that short-course neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel (1) has manageable toxicity and a low treatment mortality, (2) results in good tumor response and downstaging, (3) provides excellent locoregional control with most recurrences being distant, and (4) has improved the median survival compared with historical controls. Survival was better in stage IIIA patients, resectable patients, pathologic responders, and patients downstaged to mediastinal node negative disease (stage 0, I, or II).     

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel (100 mg/m2) was administered every 3 weeks to 46 patients registered at four centers. Patients had previously received < or = two chemotherapy regimens for MBC. All patients had progressive disease while receiving paclitaxel therapy. Treatment was repeated until there was evidence of disease progression or for a maximum of three cycles after best response. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in eight of 44 assessable patients (18.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7% to 29.5%). Seven patients had partial responses and one patient responded completely. Response rates were not significantly different by previously received paclitaxel dose or resistance. No responses were seen in 12 patients who had previously received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion, but the response rate in 32 patients who had received paclitaxel by 1- to 3-hour infusion was 25%. The median response duration was 29 weeks and the median time to disease progression was 10 weeks. Median survival was 10.5 months. Clinically significant (severe) adverse events included neutropenic fever (24% of patients), asthenia (22%), infection (13%), stomatitis (9%), neurosensory changes (7%), myalgia (7%), and diarrhea (7%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active in patients with paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer, particularly in those who failed to respond to brief infusions of paclitaxel. Response rates were comparable to or better than those seen with other therapies for patients with paclitaxel-resistant MBC. This confirms preclinical studies, which indicated only partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Colonic obstruction induced by plasma cell granuloma of the transverse colon: report of a case

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of 3-hour infusional paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with measurable metastatic diseases. Eligibility criteria included no more than one regimen of prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel was administered as an intravenous infusion over 3 hours at a dose of 210 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Premedication of dexamethazone, ranitidine, and diphenhydramine were given to all patients. Sixteen patients were registered in the study. One patient did not receive paclitaxel because of gastrointestinal bleeding before the initiation of drug's administration. Thirteen of the 15 patients had a prior history of chemotherapy. Although 10 patients (67%) developed grade 4 neutropenia, no serious infections occurred during the study. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Three (20%) patients who showed evidences of resistance to the previous intensive regimen achieved a partial response. In conclusion, a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is a safe and promising treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Paclitaxel appears to be non-cross resistant to other agents that are commonly used for gastric cancer. A large-scale phase II study is now underway.     

Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: Topotecan and paclitaxel were evaluated in a randomized, multicenter study of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had progressed during or after one platinum-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 21 days (n = 112) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) infused over 3 hours every 21 days (n = 114). Patients had bidimensionally measurable disease and were assessed for efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS: Response rate was 23 of 112 (20.5%) in topotecan-treated patients and 15 of 114 (13.2%) in paclitaxel-treated patients (P = .138). Disease stabilization for at least 8 weeks was noted in 30% of patients with topotecan and 33% of patients with paclitaxel. Median durations of response to topotecan and paclitaxel were 32 and 20 weeks, respectively (P = .222) and median times to progression were 23 and 14 weeks, respectively (P = .002). Median survival was 61 weeks for topotecan and 43 weeks for paclitaxel (P = .515). Response rates for topotecan and paclitaxel were 13.3% versus 6.7% (P = .303) in resistant patients (not responded to prior platinum-based therapy or progressed within 6 months of an initial response) and 28.8% versus 20.0% (P = .213) in sensitive patients (progressed > 6 months after response). Neutropenia was significantly more frequent on the topotecan arm 79% versus paclitaxel arm 23% (P < .01). It was short-lasting and noncumulative in both arms. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild (grades 1 to 2) for both agents. CONCLUSION: Topotecan has efficacy at least equivalent to paclitaxel manifested by the higher response rate and significantly longer time to progression.     

Knowledge and attitudes among California dental care providers regarding child abuse and neglect

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus a platinum compound (carboplatin or cisplatin) is the current regimen of choice for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The two most widely used combinations are paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 24-hour infusion) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, 3-hour infusion) plus carboplating dosed to an area under curve of 7.5. Randomized trials are in progress comparing these two regimens. Numerous other clinical issues remain regarding how to maximize the effectiveness of this therapy, including dose and schedule, duration of treatment, route of administration, and incorporation of other agents with novel mechanisms of cytotoxicity. New agents currently undergoing evolution as part of novel induction regimens have been shown to have significant activity in recurrent ovarian cancer and include topotecan, gemcitabine, oral etoposide, and encapsulated doxorubicin.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in stage III and IV ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 4 weeks and to gain more insight into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy-naive patients with suboptimally debulked stage III (tumor masses > 3 cm) and stage IV ovarian cancer were entered onto this phase I trial in which paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at dosages of 125 to 225 mg/m2 immediately followed by carboplatin over 30 minutes at dosages of 300 to 600 mg/m2. A total of six courses was planned, followed by a second-look laparoscopy/laparotomy. Patients with a response and/or minimal residual disease at second-look laparoscopy received three additional courses. Twenty-six patients participated in the pharmacokinetic part of the study. RESULTS: The most important hematologic toxicity encountered was neutropenia. Neutropenia was more pronounced for the higher dose levels (DLs) and was cumulative. Thrombocytopenia was mild in the first eight DLs, but increased during the treatment courses. Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of vomiting, neuropathy, fatigue, rash, pruritus, myalgia, and arthralgia. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in this trial were neutropenic fever, thrombocytopenia that required platelet transfusions, and cumulative neuropathy. Of 33 patients assessable for response, 26 major responders (78%, 20 complete response [CR] and six partial response [PR]) were documented. The maximal concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were not different from the historical data for paclitaxel as a single agent. Retrospective analysis using a modified Calvert formula showed that the measured carboplatin AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) were 30% +/- 3.4% less than the calculated carboplatin AUC. Neutropenia was more pronounced than could be expected on the basis of the historical times above a threshold concentration greater than 0.1 mumol/L (T > or = 0.1 mumol/L) or 0.05 mumol/L (T > or = 0.05 mumol/L), and thrombocytopenia was less than could be expected from historical sigmoidal Emax models. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2 and carboplatin 550 mg/m2 every 4 weeks is a well-tolerated treatment modality. The paclitaxel-carboplatin combination is highly active in stage III (bulky) and stage IV ovarian cancer. No indications for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between carboplatin and paclitaxel were found.     

Carcinoma of unknown primary site: treatment with 1-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination that includes paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site were treated with the following regimen, administered every 21 days: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion on day 1, carboplatin at an estimated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6.0 on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg alternated with 100 mg orally on days 1 through 10. Responding patients received a total of four courses of treatment. The following histologies were included: adenocarcinoma, 30 patients; poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA), 21; poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, three; and squamous carcinoma, one. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 53 assessable patients (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 61%) had major objective responses to treatment (seven complete responses). Response rates were similar in patients with adenocarcinoma versus PDC (45% and 48%, respectively). The actuarial median survival time for the entire group was 13.4 months. The regimen was well tolerated, with only seven hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia and fever (4% of courses) and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide is highly active and well tolerated in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site. Response rates and survival in this multicenter community-based trial compare favorably with all previously studied empiric regimens. In addition, this regimen is substantially less toxic and easier to administer than the cisplatin-based regimens previously used in this setting. If this level of efficacy is confirmed, this treatment should be considered standard first-line therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site.     

Randomized phase II study of two schedules of topotecan in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study

PURPOSE: As topotecan is S-phase-specific, its efficacy is likely schedule-dependent. Therefore, a randomized study using a "pick the winner" design was undertaken to compare two schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with no more than two separate regimens of chemotherapy, one of which had to be platinum-containing, were randomized to either topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 30 minutes daily for 5 days repeated every 21 days (arm A, the standard arm), or topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion once a week for 4 weeks repeated every 6 weeks (arm B, the experimental arm). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were eligible and 63 were assessable for response. The response rate in arm A was 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6% to 41.2%), which was significantly superior to that in arm B, 3.1% (95% CI, 0.1% to 16%) (P = .026). The regimens were not equitoxic, with 94% of patients on arm A experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia as opposed to 52% on arm B. CONCLUSION: The weekly 24 hour infusion of topotecan at 1.75 mg/m2 was ineffective in relapsed ovarian cancer. The daily-times-five schedule remains the schedule of choice. As the regimens were not equitoxic, one cannot differentiate between an ineffective schedule and an ineffective dose as the reason for the differing response rates. However, the degree of myelotoxicity that already occurs will preclude any substantially higher dosing with the weekly regimen.     

A phase II trial of paclitaxel in refractory germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients with refractory germ cell tumors will not respond to standard salvage regimens. Thus there is a need for new active agents. Paclitaxel has demonstrated activity against a variety of solid tumors in both laboratory and clinical studies. METHODS: Eighteen patients with refractory germ cell tumors who failed initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy and a maximum of 2 salvage regimens were enrolled into a Phase II trial of paclitaxel at a dose of 170 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 24 hours every 21 days without growth factor support. The median age of the patients was 32.5 years (range, 18-49 years). The testis was the primary site of tumor for 13 patients (72%) and the tumor was extragonadal in 5 patients (28%). Six patients (33%) were late recurrences. Twelve patients (67%) had > or = 2 metastatic sites. The median number of previous chemotherapy cycles was six (range, four to nine). Three patients (17%) previously had undergone autologous bone marrow transplantation. RESULTS: Two patients (11%) responded to paclitaxel. Major toxicities were Grade 3-4 neutropenia (55% of patients) and Grade 3-4 neurotoxicity (2 patients). Neutropenic fever occurred in 3 patients (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel demonstrated minimal activity in heavily pretreated patients with multiple, poor risk clinical features. These results in part may be due to the unfavorable characteristics of the patients in the current study, specifically the high percentage of patients with late recurrences and extragonadal primary tumors, both of which are known to respond poorly to salvage therapy. Other trials with different patient populations and doses of paclitaxel reported response rates ranging from 13.3%-26%. The role of paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with refractory germ cell tumors remains to be defined in future studies.     

Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (PA390)

BACKGROUND: A number of single agents have been tested in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck receiving palliative treatment. In general, 15-30% of patients achieve a partial response lasting 3-4 months. Treatment has not been shown to alter survival rates. It is clear that new drugs with potentially greater activity need to be identified. For this purpose, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced, incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible. The dose and schedule tested was the maximum tolerable dose of 250 mg/m2 determined from Phase I trials using a 24-hour infusion schedule and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support. Courses were given at 3-week intervals until progression of disease was documented. Dose modifications were specified for hematologic toxicity and for neurotoxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were registered on study and 30 were eligible. Severe or life-threatening granulocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity observed, occurring in 91% of patients. Prior to response evaluation, one patient died of sepsis and one died of a myocardial infarct. Response was observed in 40% of eligible patients (4 complete and 8 partial responses). The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 2-20 months), with a median survival of 9.2 months and a 1-year survival rate of 33%. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that paclitaxel is an active agent for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Studies evaluating alternative infusion schedules and combination regimens currently are underway.     

Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an open-label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy that contained cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel

PURPOSE: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, was evaluated in a multicenter, phase II study of women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who relapsed after one or two prior regimens that included platinum and paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 daily was administered as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle. Eligibility criteria included bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Efficacy was assessed by independent radiologic review. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated; 81% were platinum resistant. Sixty-two patients had received one prior regimen and 77 patients had received two prior regimens. Nine patients were not assessable for response; however, all patients were included in the response analysis. The overall response rate was 13.7%; 12.4% in platinum-resistant and 19.2% in platinum-sensitive patients. Stable disease lasted at least 8 weeks in 27.3% of the patients. The median duration of response and time to progression were 18.1 and 12.1 weeks, respectively. The median survival was 47.0 weeks. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 82% of the patients (34% of the courses) and thrombocytopenia in 30% of the patients (9% of the courses). Infectious complications occurred in 6% of the courses. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. There were no drug-related toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: As a single agent, topotecan has modest activity in women with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who have progressed or not responded after one or two prior regimens with platinum and paclitaxel. Further investigation of combination regimens is indicated in the primary therapy for ovarian cancer based on the mechanism of action and tolerability.     

Economic and policy implications of adopting paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer: an Ontario perspective

PURPOSE: To determine the potential economic and policy implications that result from incorporating paclitaxel into first-line therapy for stage 3 and 4 ovarian cancer patients in the province of Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (CC), a standard therapy, with cisplatin/paclitaxel (CT). Based on survival curves from a clinical trial, mean costs and survival were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on altering the duration of paclitaxel infusion, discount rates, and efficacy of paclitaxel. RESULTS: The mean survival duration is prolonged from 2.06 years with the standard therapy to 2.44 years with the paclitaxel combination. The paclitaxel therapy is more expensive, with a mean cost of $17,469 (Canadian) per patient treated with CT compared with $5,228 per patient with CC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $32,213 per year gained. Sensitivity analyses show that the conclusions remain unchanged. The use of CT as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer patients in Ontario requires an additional $9 million per year over and above the present costs to treat this patient population. CONCLUSION: Although paclitaxel-based therapy prolongs survival, it comes at an increased cost. It may not be possible to fund paclitaxel treatment using resources presently allocated to first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The policy implications for absorbing the cost of paclitaxel in the context of a publicly funded health care system are discussed.     

A Phase I dose escalation trial of continuous infusion paclitaxel to augment high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa plus stem cell rescue for the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, an effective chemotherapeutic agent in the management of breast carcinoma, may have activity in women whose disease has recurred after high dose chemotherapy. With this is mind the authors explored the addition of a 120-hour continuous infusion of paclitaxel to a previously reported regimen comprised of high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. METHODS: Thirty-one women with advanced breast carcinoma (30 patients with Stage IV disease and 1 patient with Stage IIIB disease) underwent harvest and cryopreservation of bone marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells. High dose cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m2) and thiotepa (225 mg/m2) were administered intravenously on Days -7, -5, and -3. Paclitaxel was administered as a 120-hour continuous infusion starting on Day -7. RESULTS: Three patients were treated at the initial cohort dose of 50 mg/m2 (over 120 hours), 6 patients at 100 mg/m2, 6 patients at 125 mg/m2, 6 patients at 150 mg/m2, 6 patients at 180 mg/m2, and 4 patients at 210 mg/m2. All patients completed the treatment protocol as planned with no associated transplant-related deaths. Mucositis as evidenced by either stomatitis or noninfectious diarrhea was experienced by all patients and was determined to be the dose-limiting toxicity at the 210 mg/m2 dose level. One patient with dose-limiting mucositis required intubation for airway protection and also experienced Grade 3 (according to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B common toxicity grading scale) pulmonary and neurologic toxicity. Only one Grade 3 toxicity was encountered below the maximum tolerated dose in a patient who developed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage at a dose of 125 mg/m2. No allergic reactions or clinical evidence of peripheral neuropathies were encountered. Cardiac, hepatic, and renal toxicities were minimal. Response rates in this previously treated patient population were difficult to assess in light of the high incidence of bone metastases; an overall response rate of 24% was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 180 mg/m2 as a 120-hour continuous infusion may be added safely to high dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa with autologous stem cell rescue. Further studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and further define the toxicity of this recommended Phase II dose.     

BAD partly reverses paclitaxel resistance in human ovarian cancer cells

Although paclitaxel is an important chemotherapy agent for the treatment of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, its utility is significantly limited by the frequent development of drug resistance. Recent evidence suggests that resistance to chemotherapy may be partly related to defects in the apoptotic pathway. In this study we have investigated whether enhancement of apoptotic pathway function through stable expression of the BAD protein is capable of sensitizing human epithelial ovarian cancer cells to the effects of chemotherapy. Expression of HA-BAD in six separate clonal transfectants from two different ovarian cancer cell lines was found to significantly enhance the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel, vincristine, and, to a lesser extent, etoposide. Enhancement of paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in HA-BAD-expressing clones was demonstrated by trypan blue exclusion, clonogenic cell assay, and flow cytometric evaluation. Importantly, this effect was associated with binding of HA-BAD to BCL-xL and concomitant disruption of BAX:BCL-xL interaction. Taken together, these data suggest that the development of small molecules which mimic the effects of BAD may represent a new class of drugs capable of preventing or reversing resistance to chemotherapy agents such as paclitaxel.