Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience

BACKGROUND: The choice between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis remains controversial. The aims of this study were to assess our 10-year experience with proctocolectomy, endoanal mucosectomy, construction of an ileal reservoir pouch, and IPAA in a series of 171 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and to compare the functional results after IPAA with those after IRA. METHODS: Data from patients treated by IPAA at one institution were prospectively accumulated from October 1983 to October 1993. Medical records of 171 consecutive patients were studied regarding morbidity and functional results. These functional results were compared with those of a series of 23 patients who underwent IRA at the same institution. RESULTS: One patient (0.6%) died after operation. Sixty-two patients (36%) had concomitant colorectal carcinoma, 36 of which tumors were invasive (15 stage A, 13 stage B, and 8 stage C). Forty-six patients (27%) had at least one postoperative complication, with 14 patients requiring reoperation (8%). Twenty-six patients (15%) had obstruction. Seven patients (4%) had pelvic sepsis, and one had transient impotence (0.6%). Only two patients (1%) had a typical episode of pouchitis. The mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 3 to 100 months); 101 patients were monitored for more than 1 year. Little difference was noted between bowel function after IRA and that after IPAA. The mean daytime stool frequency after IPAA was 4.2 with 26% of patients having an average of 1 bowel movement at nighttime, compared with a stool frequency of 3.0 and 13% of patients having night evacuation after IRA. Daytime continence was normal for 98% of patients after IPAA and for all the patients after IRA. Nighttime continence was normal in 96% and 98% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and functional results after IPAA for familial adenomatous polyposis do not differ from those reported after IRA. For this reason and because of the risk of rectal cancer after ileorectal anastomosis, IPAA with endoanal mucosectomy is our first choice in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.     

Prospectively evaluating anal sphincter function after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis

The decreased anal sphincter pressure that occurs after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA) has usually been attributed to damage of the internal and sphincter. We hypothesized that the operation damages both the internal and the external anal sphincter. Resting pressure in the anal canal (a function of internal and external sphincters), anal squeeze pressure (a function of external sphincter only), and the rectal-anal inhibitory reflex (involving the internal sphincter) were measured manometrically in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis (4 women and 6 men; mean age, 33 years; range: 20 to 49 years). The patients were studied while awake before IPAA, under general anesthesia with striated muscle blockade just before incision, awake 2 months later before ileostomy takedown, and again under anesthesia with blockade just before takedown. The operation decreased maximum resting anal pressure while awake and during anesthesia with blockade. The decrease was detected in the proximal anal canal but not in the distal anal canal. In addition, the operation impaired anal squeeze pressure and abolished the rectal-anal inhibitory reflex. We conclude that IPAA damages both the internal and the external anal sphincter.     

Proctocolectomy with ileal W pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, which is a relatively new procedure, has become a standard procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgical management. The main impact of this procedure is to cure patients of disease and to avoid permanent ileostomy, preserving better defecatory function and acceptable QOL. Some key aspects of our surgical procedure are as follows: 1) two or three separate staged operation, 2) W-shaped reservoir, 3) distal rectal mucosectomy and handsewn ileo-anal anastomosis, 4) short muscular cuff, and 5) temporary diverting ileostomy. Staged operation and diverting ileostomy are helpful to decrease risk of pelvic infection. Total removal of the rectal mucosa is necessary to cure the disease, and shorter muscular cuff decreases operating time and bleeding and thus the risk of pelvic sepsis. The W-shaped reservoir described by Nicholls brings both spontaneous defecation and improved function. We have adopted ileal W-pouch among several types of reservoir to 58 patients with UC since 1984, and found that a large and wide reservoir might allow better defecatory function. There were no cases of serious complications and no needs to remove the reservoir. Mean daily stool frequency was gradually decreased with time, and 4.9 stools per 24 hours at present day, and clinical score of neorectal function also gradually improved according to reduction of stool frequency. Seventy three percent of patients felt their defecatory function satisfactory and 89% of the patients recovered acceptable QOL no less than that obtained during the medically treated period.     

Typical complications and their control after restorative proctocolectomy

The overall rate of complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is 60%. This rate, however, includes complications such as bowel-obstruction and hernias. Pouch-related complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a frequency of 15-25%. In an analysis of the recent literature the main risk factors are: tension of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, lack of protective ileostomy, preoperatively undiagnosed Crohn's disease and the experience of the surgeon. We classified pouch related-complications into (1) surgical complications (leakage, bleeding, pelvic sepsis, fistulas); (2) technical problems (long S-pouch spout, rectal cuff stenosis, etc.); (3) functional problems (anal sphincter insufficiency, night incontinence, hypermotility, evacuation disorders); (4) pouchitis; (5) pouch neoplasias. Pathogenesis, diagnostic features, and medical and surgical therapy are discussed in detail. In our own series of 11 pouch-redo operations we had 6 pouch fistulas (3 related to Crohn's disease, 3 postoperative fistulas), 3 wrongly constructed pouches, 1 chronic pouchitis and 1 long S-pouch spout. In 3 cases the pouch had to be excised completely. Two patients remained with a permanent ileostomy. In 6 patients the pouch could be preserved on long term. Due to the technical complexity, the need to understand pathophysiology and the need for a differentiated diagnostic procedure, this operation should be performed only in specialised centers.     

Does the presence of a pre-ileostomy closure asymptomatic pouch-anastomotic sinus tract affect the success of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. This two-stage procedure with a temporary diverting ileostomy avoids the catastrophic consequences of anastomotic leakage. We set out to determine the incidence and effect of asymptomatic pouch sinuses detected prior to ileostomy closure on the outcome of IPAA. A total 1600 IPAAs performed at the Mayo Clinic were reviewed. Forty-one (2.6%) asymptomatic sinuses were treated expectantly. There were 22 males and 19 females who had a median age of 32 years (range 14 to 58 years). The median time to ileostomy closure was 5.9 months (range 4 to 11 months). Five patients required further surgery following closure of ileostomy. The pouch function in these five patients was similar to that in the remainder of the group. Patients with a persistent sinus at the time of ileostomy closure had the same function as the main cohort. This group had a median of five (range 2 to 12) stools during the day and two (range 0 to 4) at night. The total number of stools per 24 hours was seven (range 2 to 14). Frequent incontinence occurred in 9.7% and 7.3% during the day and at night, respectively. Only 2.4% (1/41) were disappointed with the results of the operation and 80.4% (33/41) found their quality of life improved. Functional outcomes were comparable to those achieved with uncomplicated IPAA. Radiologically detected asymptomatic sinuses can be treated expectantly with a low rate of pouch loss and subsequent surgery. This is not considered a serious setback inasmuch as long-term function and quality of life are comparable to that achieved with IPAA without sinus tracts.     

Results after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and coexisting colorectal cancer

Although the operation of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), its place in the management of patients with FAP and cancer has not been defined. The authors have reviewed their experience with these patients to determine the safety of IPAA and its efficacy as a cancer operation. The records of 55 patients with FAP who had undergone IPAA were examined. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination. Eight patients had FAP with coexisting colorectal cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 25 (range 13-46) years, and at operation 33 (range 22-36) years. Of the eight patients (four men), four had colonic cancer and four had rectal cancer. Synchronous colorectal carcinoma was found in two patients. Staging according to the tumor node metastasis classification showed that five patients had stage 1 tumour, two had stage 2 and one had stage 3. Tumours were well, moderately or poorly differentiated in one, five and two patients respectively. During a median follow-up of 56 (range 14-98) months, metastasis developed in the liver of one patient 66 months after surgery. Two patients suffered complications: one had small bowel obstruction and the other mucosal prolapse. Tubular adenomas were found in the pouch of two patients and in the anal transitional zone of one. Pouch function is good to excellent in all surviving patients. Restorative proctocolectomy for patients with FAP and coexisting colorectal cancer can be undertaken with a favourable prognosis and function. It is compatible with curative intent.     

Anorectal reconstruction by coloperineal anastomosis and dynamic double graciloplasty after abdomino-perineal resection

The aim of this study was to assess the technical and functional results of total anorectal reconstruction with double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection (APR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 1995 to December 1996. 10 patients (6 males and 4 females), with a mean age of 54 years (range 39-74), underwent anorectal reconstruction for low rectal adenocarcinoma. All patients had preoperative radiotherapy and six had postoperative chemotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed in three stages: 1) APR, coloperineal anastomosis, double graciloplasty and ileostomy; 2) three months later, implantation of stimulator and leads; 3) after a two-months training period, the stoma was closed. RESULTS: There was no postoperative mortality. Early and late morbidity occurred in 5 patients: 2 colonic fistulas, 1 necrosis of colon, 1 ileostomy prolapse, 1 neosphincter stenosis, 1 sepsis of stimulator. No patient had recurrence of the disease (mean follow-up 16 months), but two patients died at 3 and 8 months, respectively from anorexia and pulmonary embolism. Seven patients were available for evaluation (2 fistula, 1 death). Before training, the resting pressure and the squeeze pressure were 30 and 175 cm H2O respectively. At the time of evaluation, the electrical stimulated pressure was 95 cm H2O. Six of these 7 patients were continent (5 with spontaneous defecation, 1 with enemas) and 1 was incontinent. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty can be an alternative to permanent colostomy for selected patients after APR. However, there is a high morbidity and the quality of life of the patients must be evaluated.     

In vitro shear strength of bonded amalgam cores with and without pins

After ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) there is an increased risk of incontinence due to intraoperative damage of the anal sphincter. We present a new concept to identify a potential incontinence prior to the closure of ileostomy by clinical and anal manometrical examinations. In 11 of 121 (9.1%) patients we diagnosed a potential incontinence. By biofeedback training we could achieve in this way a sufficient continence after the closure of ileostomy. After an average of 5.0 +/- 4.3 months of training rest pressures improved from 19.3 +/- 2.1 mmHg to 33.0 +/- 3.5 mmHg and squeeze pressures from 60.5 +/- 27.7 mmHg to 93.5 +/- 17.3 mmHg. Prior to IPAA patients with potential incontinence show significantly reduced rest pressures of 51.0 +/- 18.4 mmHg.     

Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: normal findings, examination pitfalls, and complications

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a procedure in which an ileal reservoir is constructed after total colectomy and anastomosed to the anus. IPAA is a well-established option for patients who require surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Although excellent functional results can be achieved with IPAA, the procedure is associated with an appreciable number of complications, including small bowel obstruction, pouch fistula, anastomotic separation, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and abscess, stricture, and pouchitis. However, most of these complications do not require surgical intervention and can be managed with aggressive medical treatment and delay of ileostomy closure. Radiography of the IPAA pouch is routinely performed before closure of the diverting ileostomy to evaluate the integrity of the pouch and anastomosis. Such radiography can demonstrate many of the complications of IPAA, thus allowing identification of patients who may require intervention or delay before closure of the ileostomy.     

Bone assessment in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis are at risk of low bone mineral density (BMD). Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis diminishes the risk of bone disease. The aims of this study were to assess the mechanism of low BMD and to measure bone density changes after IPAA. METHODS: Twenty patients with IPAA for ulcerative colitis, of mean(s.d.) age 38(9) (range 21-58) years, had measurements of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, a mean(s.d.) 28(23) (range 3-84) months after proctocolectomy. Serum levels of calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin and 25-hydroxy vitamin D were determined. Fifteen patients were followed for 28(12) (range 8-50) months. RESULTS: At baseline, six patients had spine BMD more than two standard deviations below the normal value, and three had vertebral crush fractures. Mean vitamin D values were normal and no patient had osteomalacia. BMD increased with time elapsed since IPAA (spine: r = 0.71, P = 0.005). During follow-up, mean(s.d.) changes in bone density were +2.3(3.8) and +2.1(5.6) per cent per year at the spine and femoral neck respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that in patients with IPAA for ulcerative colitis, low BMD is not associated with vitamin D malabsorption and may be reversible after surgery.     

Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results, however remain undefined; the major concern is that function may deteriorate. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome in a subgroup of patients who have an IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis for > 10 years. METHODS: Among 1400 IPAA patients, 75 consecutive subjects (31 females and 44 males; median age 31 at operation) were identified who had the procedure prior to 1982. All patients had functional results recorded 1 year and 10 years following ileostomy closure. RESULTS: There were four deaths during the follow-up period; none were pouch related. Two patients refused ileostomy closure. Of the remaining 69 patients, there were 8 (11 percent) failures, leaving 61 subjects available for study. Stool frequency (7 +/- 3, mean +/- SD) remained unchanged. Of the 50 subjects with initially excellent daytime continence, 39 (78 percent) remained the same, 10 (20 percent) developed minor incontinence, and 1 developed poor control after 10 years. Four of 10 subjects (40 percent) with initial minor daytime incontinence remained unchanged, 4 (40 percent) improved, and 2 (20 percent) worsened. The one subject with poor control at one year was unchanged. Nocturnal fecal spotting increased over the 10-year period but not significantly (38 percent vs. 52 percent; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: After IPAA, functional results in terms of stool frequency and rate of fecal incontinence did not deteriorate with time.     

Intraoperative abandonment of ileal pouch to anal anastomosis--the Mayo Clinic experience

BACKGROUND: Completion of the ileal pouch to anal anastomosis (IPAA) is neither always possible nor advisable based on intraoperative findings. This study was undertaken to document the incidence of and reasons for intraoperative abandonment of IPAA in a series of over 1,700 attempts. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic surgical index from January 1981 through December 1995. Patients with the preoperative diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis for whom IPAA was planned but not completed are the subject of this report. Comparison is made to patients with a completed IPAA from the Mayo Clinic IPAA registry. RESULTS: During a 15-year period, 1,789 IPAA attempts were made. Intraoperative abandonment occurred in 74 (4.1%). Patients in whom the operation was abandoned were older than patients in whom it was not (38 versus 33 years, p < 0.01), with age older than 40 years conferring a relative risk of 1.87 versus age younger than 40 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.94%). IPAA was abandoned for technical reasons in 32 (43%), intraoperative diagnosis of Crohn's disease in 27 (36%), colorectal cancer in 10 (14%), mesenteric desmoid in 3 (4%), and miscellaneous reasons in 2 (3%) patients. Fifty-one (69%) patients underwent proctocolectomy and ileostomy and 23 (31%) underwent sphincter preserving procedures. Of these, 2 underwent subsequent successful IPAA. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative counseling for IPAA should include discussion of the risk of intraoperative abandonment (4.1%). Older patients are at increased risk. If the IPAA is abandoned for reversible reasons, preservation of the anal sphincter preserves the option of a subsequent IPAA.     

Crohn's colitis: the fate of the rectum

Previous reports suggest that up to 70% of patients undergoing surgery for Crohn's disease of the large bowel do not have gastrointestinal continuity restored and require a permanent ileostomy. In this study the experience with patients requiring surgical treatment of large bowel Crohn's disease is reviewed with particular reference to the management of the rectum. The records of 19 elective and 25 urgent colonic resections performed for large bowel Crohn's disease in 44 patients (16 males, 28 females; mean age 41 years, range 17-76) between 1983 and 1995 were reviewed. Staged proctectomy was performed in 5 of 12 patients who had colectomy for acute colitis and in one patient who had had an elective colectomy. Permanent ileostomy was required in 72% of patients with acute Crohn's colitis and 84% of patients who had elective surgery for large bowel Crohn's. Over 70% of patients having surgical treatment of Crohn's disease of the large bowel required permanent ileostomy. No cases of cancer developed in patients with retained rectal stumps.     

Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts

PURPOSE: Increasing experience with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) associated with increasing knowledge about anorectal physiology has lead to a large number of publications. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current understanding of fecal continence as revealed by the evolution of the ileoanal procedure. METHODS: Review of the literature covering the most important physiologic parameters involved in fecal continence was undertaken. RESULTS: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex is probably absent after IPAA but is preserved when distal anorectal mucosa is spared. Anal resting pressure decreases but is less affected when the internal anal sphincter is less traumatized. Squeeze pressure is not importantly affected, and the importance of reservoir function as a determinant of stool frequency is emphasized. IPAA does not affect the coordination between pouch and anal canal motility in the majority of cases. Normal continence is preserved, even during the night, by preserving a gradient of pressure between the pouch and anal canal. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic concepts are well established, but controversies about the continence mechanism related to IPAA remain. The IPAA procedure has allowed discrimination of details about the function of multiple structures involved in fecal continence.     

Results of the double stapling procedure in colorectal surgery

In this report we review our results with the double stapling technique (DST) in 162 patients with colorectal diseases in an attempt to identify some of the potential pitfalls of this new technique. Among these 162 patients, there were 125 patients with colorectal cancer, 25 with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC), 9 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 2 with adult Hirschsprung's disease, and 1 with sigmoid colon fistula. A total of 46 anastomoses (28 for rectal cancer, 13 for UC, 3 for FAP, and 2 for adult Hirschsprung's disease) were performed at or near the dentate line. Of these, 10 had protective diverting colostomy or ileostomy. The results showed that 6 patients with rectal cancer had anastomotic leakage (3.7%); however, 4 of the 6 patients had also received preoperative irradiation. All the leaks healed after the patients had undergone diverting colostomy, but 7 patients with rectal cancer suffered from neurogenic bladder postoperatively (4.3%). Wound infection occurred in 4 patients (2.5%), anastomotic bleeding in 3 (1.9%), and anal pain in 1 (0.6%), respectively. One patient with rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases died of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). These results thus suggest that the double stapling technique provides a safe anastomosis at or near the dentate line not only for rectal cancer but also for UC, FAP, and adult Hirschsprung's disease.     

Factors related to the presence of IgA class antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have assessed the IgA antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity in ulcerative colitis patients and there is no information about factors related to its synthesis and its status after colectomy. The aims of the study were to assess the serum IgA ANCA prevalence in ulcerative colitis patients, both nonoperated and operated, and to determine the clinical factors related to this positivity. METHODS: Fifty-four ulcerative colitis patients, 63 ulcerative colitis colectomized patients (32 with Brooke's ileostomy and 31 with ileal pouch anal anastomosis), and 24 controls were studied. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were detected by specific indirect immunofluorescent assays. RESULTS: The percentage of IgA ANCA was significantly higher in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (45%) than in patients with Brooke's ileostomy (22%). There were no differences related to the presence of pouchitis in ileal pouch anal anastomosis patients. Patients with nonoperated extensive colitis (47%) had a significantly higher percentage of IgA ANCA than patients with proctitis (19%). Total percentage of ANCA (IgA and/or IgG) tended to be higher in ulcerative colitis and in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis than in patients with Brooke's ileostomy. However, in ileal pouch anal anastomosis patients, ANCA positivity was mainly due to exclusive IgA production. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of ulcerative colitis patients, and especially colectomized patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, had IgA ANCA, suggesting that ANCA production in ulcerative colitis might be stimulated by an immune reaction in the intestinal mucosa.     

Gynaecological state of health of 2 654 women in Nurmes 1970-71. A clinical outpatient study

Eighty-one patients who had had colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease of the colon from 1 to 13 years previously were interviewed and examined by a surgeon with whom they had had no previous contact. Sixty-four patients (79 per cent) had a satisfactory result. In 12 patients the operation had failed and an ileostomy had been established, and in a further 5 patients the result was considered unsatisfactory. Despite a high incidence of frequent loose stools and minor anorectal complications, most of the patients were satisfied with the result and would not contemplate the alternative of an ileostomy. No patient had developed rectal cancer. Provided that the rectum is examined regularly for pre-malignant or malignant change, colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis offer a satisfactory alternative to proctocolectomy and ileostomy for many patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.     

Management of left-sided colonic obstruction by subtotal colectomy and ileocolic anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess complications and functional results of emergency subtotal colectomy with ileocolic anastomosis for acute left-sided colonic obstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 37 patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction. INTERVENTIONS: Emergency subtotal colectomy with immediate anastomosis (n = 20), Hartmann's procedure (n = 13) or double-loop transverse colostomy (n = 4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, frequency of defecation, and continence. RESULTS: Morbidity after subtotal colectomy was 10% (n = 2) and mortality 0. There was one anastomotic dehiscence that required a temporary ileostomy. Mean hospital stay was 15 days (range 10-31). All had adequate continence. After 6 weeks mean frequency of defecation was 3/24 hrs (range 2-6). 9 patients died within 2 years of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal colectomy with ileocolic anastomosis is a suitable procedure for treating left-sided colonic obstruction provided that pelvic floor function is adequate and a skilled surgeon is available.     

The dilemma of Crohn's disease: ileosigmoidal fistula complicating Crohn's disease

Between 1965 and 1975, 27 patients underwent surgical treatment for ileosigmoidal fistulas complicating Crohn's disease at the Cleveland Clinic. There was no death and no anastomotic leak. The preferred procedure is resection of the ileocecal area involved by Crohn's disease with ileocolic anastomosis and a separate segmental resection of the sigmoid colon with colocolic anastomosis. A covering temporary loop ileostomy is used when there is associated pelvic sepsis or small-bowel obstruction.     

Ileal pouches: adaptation and inflammation

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the operation of choice following proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis. Functioning ileal pouch mucosa undergoes histological changes resembling the colon (colonic metaplasia). The possible role of stasis and luminal factors--bile acids, short-chain fatty acids and bacteria--are discussed. It seems likely that colonic metaplasia is an adaptive response to the new luminal environment in IPAA. Inflammation in the ileal reservoir ('pouchitis') is the most significant late complication in IPAA. It occurs in 20-30% of patients and is virtually confined to those with prior UC. The clinical picture in pouchitis is highly variable; however, it can be easily categorized into three groups. Nevertheless, in most cases it is likely to represent recurrent UC in the ileal pouch. Current treatments and possible preventative strategies for pouchitis have been outlined.