A New Statistical High‐Quality Process Monitoring Method: The Counted Number Between Omega‐Event Control Charts

Control chart techniques for high‐quality process have attracted great attention in modern precision manufacturing. Traditional control charts are no longer applicable because of high false alarm rate. To solve this problem, in this article a new statistical process monitoring method, the counted number between omega‐event statistical process control charts, abbreviated as CBΩ charts, is proposed. The phrase omega event denotes that one observation falls into some certain interval and the CBΩ chart is to monitor the number of consecutive parts between successive r omega events. On the basis of CBΩ charts, a dual‐CBΩ monitoring scheme is developed. This scheme sets up two CBΩ charts with symmetrical omega events, (μ + ?σ, + ∞) and (? ∞, μ ? ?σ), respectively. The performance of CBΩ charts and dual‐CBΩ monitoring is investigated. Dual‐CBΩ monitoring has shown its capability in detecting both mean and variance shift and convenience in implementation compared with other traditional charts. Dual‐CBΩ monitoring can reduce false alarm rate greatly without introducing an unacceptable loss of sensitivity in detecting out‐of‐control signals in high‐quality process control. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Improved Phase I Control Charts for Monitoring Times Between Events

In many situations, the times between certain events are observed and monitored instead of the number of events particularly when the events occur rarely. In this case, it is common to assume that the times between events follow an exponential distribution. Control charts are one of the main tools of statistical process control and monitoring. Control charts are used in phase I to assist operating personnel in bringing the process into a state of statistical control. In this paper, phase I control charts are considered for the observations from an exponential distribution with an unknown mean. A simulation study is carried out to compare the in‐control robustness and out‐of‐control performance of the proposed chart. It is seen that the proposed charts are considerably more in‐control robust than two competing charts and have comparable out‐of‐control properties. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Time‐between‐events control charts for an exponentiated class of distributions of the renewal process

Time‐between‐events control charts are commonly used to monitor high‐quality processes and have several advantages over the ordinary control charts. In this article, we present some new control charts based on the renewal process, where a class of absolutely continuous exponentiated distributions is assumed for the time between events. This class includes the generalized exponential, generalized Rayleigh, and exponentiated Pareto distributions. Although we discuss the design structure for all the mentioned distributions, our main focus will be on the generalized exponential distribution due to its practical relevance and popularity. Since the generalized exponential distribution is a generalization of the traditional exponential distribution, the new control chart is more flexible than the existing exponential time‐between‐events charts. The control chart performance is evaluated in terms of some useful measures, including the average run length (ARL), the expected quadratic loss, continuous ranked probability, and the relative ARL. The effect of parameter estimation using the maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods on the ARL is also discussed in this article. The study also presents an illustrative example and 4 case studies to highlight the practical relevance of the proposal.     

Design of Gamma Charts Based on Average Time to Signal

Gamma charts for time between events are very useful in the high‐quality processes, which monitor the time until the rth event. The average time to signal (ATS) is adopted to evaluate the performance of Gamma charts, because it reflects both the number and the sampling interval of samples inspected until an out‐of‐control signal occurs. An ATS‐unbiased design for Gamma charts with known parameters is proposed based on the hypothesis test of the scale parameter. For the phase I monitoring, a new ATS‐unbiased design with unknown parameters is developed, and a sequential sampling scheme is adopted to start process monitoring as soon as possible. Some specific guidelines to stop updating the control limits are suggested from the convergence of the width between control limits with different phase I sample sizes. Finally, a real example is illustrated to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed approach. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A comparison study of control charts for Weibull distributed time between events

Monitoring decreases in the mean of Weibull time between events data to address process quality deteriorations is an important task in reliability analysis. Two new control charts such as Weibull exponentially weighted moving average and mixed cumulative sum‐exponentially weighted moving average by transforming the Weibull data to the exponential data are proposed and compared with 2 existing control charts such as Weibull cumulative sum and mixed exponentially weighted moving average‐cumulative sum. The performance comparison provides a way to select a specific control chart in a given situation. The average run length and the standard deviation of the run length are used as performance measures. The relative mean index is also utilized to measure the overall performance. The smaller the value of the relative mean index, the better the performance of the control chart and vice versa. Two illustrative examples are provided to show the applications of the proposed control charts.     

Monitoring of time between events with a double generally weighted moving average control chart

Monitoring of time between events (TBE) instead of the number of events is used in high‐quality processes where the events occur rarely. This article presents a double generally weighted moving average control chart with a lower time‐varying control limit to monitor the TBE (regarded as DGWMA‐TBE chart). The design parameters of the proposed chart are provided, and through a simulation study, it is shown that the DGWMA‐TBE chart is more effective than the DEWMA and GWMA charts in detecting moderate to large shifts. Furthermore, the DGWMA‐TBE chart is very robust for the same range of shifts when the TBE observations follow a Weibull or a lognormal distribution. Finally, examples are also presented to enhance the performance of the proposed chart.     

Boxplot‐based phase I control charts for time between events

To monitor the quality/reliability of a (production) process, it is sometimes advisable to monitor the time between certain events (say occurrence of defects) instead of the number of events, particularly when the events occur rarely. In this case it is common to assume that the times between the events follow an exponential distribution. In this paper, we propose a one‐ and a two‐sided control chart for phase I data from an exponential distribution. The control charts are derived from a modified boxplot procedure. The charting constants are obtained by controlling the overall Type I error rate and are tabulated for some configurations. A numerical example is provided for illustration. The in‐control robustness and the out‐of‐control performance of the proposed charts are examined and compared with those of some existing charts in a simulation study. It is seen that the proposed charts are considerably more in‐control robust and have out‐control properties comparable to the competing charts. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

On improved dispersion control charts under ranked set schemes for normal and non‐normal processes

In manufacturing industries, control charts are the promising statistical tools used for an efficient monitoring of processes. These charts enhance the product quality by timely signaling for special variations at any stage of the process. There are two common concerns in statistical process monitoring, location and variability of the quality characteristic of interest. Besides location parameter, the monitoring of process dispersion remained a matter of concern for researchers. The conventional simple random sampling (SRS) is a usual practice; however, ranked set sampling (RSS) schemes are very effective methods of choosing sample values. This study intends to design and investigate dispersion control charts under different RSS strategies for normal and non‐normal processes. We have considered RSS, median ranked set sampling (MRSS), and extreme ranked set sampling (ERSS) schemes to design dispersion control charts. The performance of the existing and the proposed control charts is evaluated in terms of relative efficiency and power for normal and a variety of non‐normal distributions. The comparative analysis revealed that the proposed structures outperform the existing charts. The application of the proposed procedures is also shown for a bottles filling process for an efficient and timely signaling of any special causes in the process.     

New EWMA control charts for monitoring process dispersion using auxiliary information

The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart is a well‐known statistical process monitoring tool because of its exceptional pace in catching infrequent variations in the process parameter(s). In this paper, we propose new EWMA charts using the auxiliary information for efficiently monitoring the process dispersion, named the auxiliary‐information–based (AIB) EWMA (AIB‐EWMA) charts. These AIB‐EWMA charts are based on the regression estimators that require information on the quality characteristic under study as well as on any related auxiliary characteristic. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation are used to compute and study the run length profiles of the AIB‐EWMA charts. The proposed charts are comprehensively compared with a recent powerful EWMA chart—which has been shown to be better than the existing EWMA charts—and an existing AIB‐Shewhart chart. It turns out that the proposed charts perform uniformly better than the existing charts. An illustrative example is also given to explain the implementation and working of the AIB‐EWMA charts.     

The Phase I Dispersion Charts for Bivariate Process Monitoring

Multivariate control charts are usually implemented in statistical process control to monitor several correlated quality characteristics. Process dispersion charts are used to determine the stability of process variation (which is typically done before monitoring the process location/mean). A Phase‐I study is generally used when population parameters are unknown. This article develops Phase‐I |S| and |G| control charts, to monitor the dispersion of a bivariate normal process. The charting constants are determined to achieve the required nominal false alarm probability (FAP₀). The performance of the proposed charts is evaluated in terms of (i) the attained false rate and (ii) the probability of signaling for out‐of‐control situations. The analysis shows that the proposed Phase‐I bivariate charts correctly control the FAP (the false alarm probability) and detect a shift occurring in the bivariate dispersion matrix with adequate probability. An example is given to explain the practical implementation of these charts. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A study of time‐between‐events control chart for the monitoring of regularly maintained systems

Owing to usage, environment and aging, the condition of a system deteriorates over time. Regular maintenance is often conducted to restore its condition and to prevent failures from occurring. In this kind of a situation, the process is considered to be stable, thus statistical process control charts can be used to monitor the process. The monitoring can help in making a decision on whether further maintenance is worthwhile or whether the system has deteriorated to a state where regular maintenance is no longer effective. When modeling a deteriorating system, lifetime distributions with increasing failure rate are more appropriate. However, for a regularly maintained system, the failure time distribution can be approximated by the exponential distribution with an average failure rate that depends on the maintenance interval. In this paper, we adopt a modification for a time‐between‐events control chart, i.e. the exponential chart for monitoring the failure process of a maintained Weibull distributed system. We study the effect of changes on the scale parameter of the Weibull distribution while the shape parameter remains at the same level on the sensitivity of the exponential chart. This paper illustrates an approach of integrating maintenance decision with statistical process monitoring methods. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

New Approaches in Monitoring Multivariate Categorical Processes based on Contingency Tables in Phase II

In some statistical process control (SPC) applications, quality of a process or product is characterized by contingency table. Contingency tables describe the relation between two or more categorical quality characteristics. In this paper, two new control charts based on the WALD and Stuart score test statistics are designed for monitoring of contingency table‐based processes in Phase‐II. The performances of the proposed control charts are compared with the generalized linear test (GLT) control chart proposed in the literature. The results show the better performance of the proposed control charts under small and moderate shifts. Moreover, new schemes are proposed to diagnose which cell corresponding to different levels of categorical variables is responsible for out‐of‐control signal. In addition, we propose EWMA–WALD and EWMA–Stuart score test control charts to improve the performance of Shewhart‐based control charts in detecting small and moderate shifts in contingency table parameters. Meanwhile, we compare the performances of two proposed EWMA‐based control charts with the ones of three existing control charts called EWMA–GLT, EWMA–GLRT and an EWMA‐type control chart for multivariate binomial/multinomial processes along with the ones of the corresponding Shewhart‐based control charts. A numerical example is given to show the efficiency of the proposed methods. Finally, the effect of parameter estimation in Phase I based on m historical contingency table on the performance of the Shewhart‐based control charts is studied. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Control Charts for Monitoring Linear Profiles with Within‐Profile Correlation Using Gaussian Process Models

Profile monitoring is the utilization of control charts for checking the stability of the quality of a product over time when the product quality is characterized by a function at each time point. Most existing control charts for monitoring profiles are based on the assumption that the observations within each profile are independent of each other, which is often invalid in practice. Successive measurements within profiles often exhibit spatial or serial correlation. This paper focuses on Phase II linear profile monitoring when within‐profile data are correlated. A Gaussian process model is used to describe the within‐profile correlation (WPC). Two Shewhart‐type multivariate control charts are proposed to monitor the linear trend term and the WPC separately in Phase II. Our proposed approaches are compared with alternative methods through numerical simulations in which different in‐control WPCs are considered. Simulation studies show that the proposed control charts are sensitive to changes in the linear trend term when the correlation is strong and effective in detecting large shifts in the WPC. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the implementation of our proposed control charts. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effective Control Charts for Monitoring Multivariate Process Dispersion

When monitoring process dispersion, it is common to pay more attention to dispersion increases than to decreases for practical reasons. Nonetheless, it is also important to detect dispersion decreases for two reasons: (i) it deserves further investigations as to why the process has improved; and (ii) if the process has changed, the settings of the control chart would need to be adjusted for effective future monitoring. In this paper, we first propose an effective control chart for detecting multivariate dispersion decreases in phase II process monitoring, which is constructed using the same approach as that of the one‐sided likelihood‐ratio‐test‐based multivariate chart proposed recently in the literature for detecting dispersion increases. We then discuss a combined charting scheme by combining these two one‐sided charts for detecting either dispersion increases or decreases. Comparative simulation studies show that the proposed combined control charting scheme outperforms several existing two‐sided control charts in terms of the average run length when the process dispersion indeed increases or decreases. Two real‐life examples are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed charts. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Poisson progressive mean control chart

In real life applications, many process‐monitoring problems in statistical process control are based on attribute data resulting from quality characteristics that cannot be measured on numerical or quantitative scales. For the monitoring of such data, a new attribute control chart has been proposed in this study, namely, the Poisson progressive Mean (PPM) control chart. The performance of the PPM chart is compared with the existing charts used for the monitoring of Poisson processes such as the Shewhart c‐chart, Poisson Exponentially Weighted Moving Average chart, Poisson double Exponentially Weighted Moving Average chart and the Poisson Cumulative Sum charts. The average run length comparison indicated the superior performance of the PPM chart in terms of shift detection ability. This study will help quality practitioners to choose an efficient attribute control chart.     

Exponential CUSUM Charts with Estimated Control Limits

Exponential CUSUM charts are used in monitoring the occurrence rate of rare events because the interarrival times of events for homogeneous Poisson processes are independent and identically distributed exponential random variables. In these applications, it is assumed that the exponential parameter, i.e. the mean, is known or has been accurately estimated. However, in practice, the in‐control mean is typically unknown and must be estimated to construct the limits for the exponential CUSUM chart. In this article, we investigate the effect of parameter estimation on the run length properties of one‐sided lower exponential CUSUM charts. In addition, analyzing conditional performance measures shows that the effect of estimation error can be significant, affecting both the in‐control average run length and the quick detection of process deterioration. We also provide recommendations regarding phase I sample sizes. This sample size must be quite large for the in‐control chart performance to be close to that for the known parameter case. Finally, we provide an industrial example to highlight the practical implications of estimation error, and to offer advice to practitioners when constructing/analyzing a phase I sample. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Enhancing the Performance of Combined Shewhart‐EWMA Charts

The combination of Shewhart control charts and an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to simultaneously monitor shifts in the mean output of a production process has proven very effective in handling both small and large shifts. To improve the sensitivity of the control chart to detect off‐target processes, we propose a combined Shewhart‐EWMA (CSEWMA) control chart for monitoring mean output using a more structured sampling technique, i.e. ranked set sampling (RSS) instead of the traditional simple random sampling. We evaluated the performance of the proposed charts in terms of different run length (RL) properties including average RL, standard deviation of the RL, and percentile of the RL. Comparisons of these charts with some existing control charts designed for monitoring small, large, or both shifts revealed that the RSS‐based CSEWMA charts are more sensitive and offer better protection against all types of shifts than other schemes considered in this study. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Phase II Shewhart‐type Control Charts for Monitoring Times Between Events and Effects of Parameter Estimation

Monitoring times between events (TBE) is an important aspect of process monitoring in many areas of applications. This is especially true in the context of high‐quality processes, where the defect rate is very low, and in this context, control charts to monitor the TBE have been recommended in the literature other than the attribute charts that monitor the proportion of defective items produced. The Shewhart‐type t‐chart assuming an exponential distribution is one chart available for monitoring the TBE. The t‐chart was then generalized to the t_r‐chart to improve its performance, which is based on the times between the occurrences of r (≥1) events. In these charts, the in‐control (IC) parameter of the distribution is assumed known. This is often not the case in practice, and the parameter has to be estimated before process monitoring and control can begin. We propose estimating the parameter from a phase I (reference) sample and study the effects of estimation on the design and performance of the charts. To this end, we focus on the conditional run length distribution so as to incorporate the ‘practitioner‐to‐practitioner’ variability (inherent in the estimates), which arises from different reference samples, that leads to different control limits (and hence to different IC average run length [ARL] values) and false alarm rates, which are seen to be far different from their nominal values. It is shown that the required phase I sample size needs to be considerably larger than what has been typically recommended in the literature to expect known parameter performance in phase II. We also find the minimum number of phase I observations that guarantee, with a specified high probability, that the conditional IC ARL will be at least equal to a given small percentage of a nominal IC ARL. Along the same line, a lower prediction bound on the conditional IC ARL is also obtained to ensure that for a given phase I sample, the smallest IC ARL can be attained with a certain (high) probability. Summary and recommendations are given. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Monitoring of Time‐Between‐Events with a Generalized Group Runs Control Chart

Control charting methods for time between events (TBE) is important in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing fields. With the aim to enhance the speed for detecting shifts in the mean TBE, this paper proposes a generalized group runs TBE chart to monitor the mean TBE of a homogenous Poisson failure process. The proposed chart combines a TBE subchart and a generalized group conforming run length subchart. The zero‐state and steady‐state performances of the proposed chart were evaluated by applying a Markov chain method. Overall, it is found that the proposed chart outperforms the existing TBE charts, such as the T, T_r, EWMA‐T, Synth‐T_r, and GR‐T_r charts. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

On the Performance of Phase I Dispersion Control Charts for Process Monitoring

Control charts are usually implemented in two phases: the retrospective phase (phase I) and the monitoring phase (phase II). The performance of any phase II control chart structure depends on the preciseness of the control limits obtained from the phase I analysis. In statistical process control, the performance of phase I dispersion charts has mainly been investigated for normal or contaminated normal distributions of the quality characteristic of interest. Little work has been carried out to investigate the performance of a wide range of possible phase I dispersion charts for processes following non‐normal distributions. The current study deals with the proper choice of a control chart for the evaluation of process dispersion in phase I. We have analyzed the performance of a wide range of dispersion control charts, including two distribution‐free structures. The performance of the control charts is evaluated in terms of probability to signal, under normal and non‐normal process setups. These results will be useful for quality control practitioners in their selection of a phase I control chart. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.