Morphology and flame‐retardancy properties of ternary high‐impact polystyrene/elastomer/polystyrene‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide composites

The effects of elastomer type on the morphology, flammability, and mechanical properties of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS)/polystyrene (PS)‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide (MH) were investigated. The ternary composites were characterized by cone calorimetry, mechanical testing, and scanning electron microscopy. Morphology was controlled with poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS) triblock copolymer or the corresponding maleinated poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA). The HIPS/SEBS/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited separation of the filler and elastomer, whereas the HIPS/SEBS‐g‐MA/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited encapsulation of the filler by SEBS‐g‐MA. The flame‐retardant and mechanical properties of the ternary composites were strongly dependent on microstructure. The composites with an encapsulation structure showed higher flame‐retardant properties than those with a separation structure at the optimum use level of SEBS‐g‐MA. Furthermore, the composites with a separation structure showed a higher modulus and impact strength than those with an encapsulation structure. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Interfacial modification of high impact polystyrene magnesium hydroxide composites effects on flame retardancy properties

High impact polystyrene (HIPS)/magnesium hydroxide (MH) composites were prepared by melt‐blending. Two kinds of interfacial modifiers were used in this research, maleinated poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA) triblock copolymer and PS. The effects of the use levels of SEBS‐g‐MA on the flame retardancy of HIPS/elastomer/MH based on unmodified and PS‐modified surface were investigated by TEM, FTIR, and combustion tests (horizontal burning test and cone calorimetry). The combustion results showed that comparing composites containing unmodified MH, the flame retarding properties of composites containing PS‐modified MH were obviously improved. The increased performance can be explained that the PS covered on the surface of MH could further improve dispersion of the filler in matrix. Furthermore, there existed a critical thickness of interfacial boundary for optimum flame‐retarding properties in both ternary composites based MH and PS‐modified MH. When the interfacial boundary relative thickness is less than 0.53, the introduction of SEBS‐g‐MA can improve the dispersion degree, leading the improvement of flame retardancy properties. However, with the increase of interfacial boundary thickness, the SEBS‐g‐MA coating around MH acted as a heat and mass transfer barrier, leading to the reduction of flame retardancy. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Molecular simulation of miscibility of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blend with the compatibilizer triblock terpolymer SBM

Polymer blend of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether) (PPE) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN), which has broad commercial interest, has limited miscibility. A triblock terpolymer, polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM), is often used as compatibilizer to improve the miscibility of PPE/SAN. In this work, dissipative particle dynamics and molecular dynamics of Material Studio were used to study the essentials that influence miscibility of the blend systems, and then Flory–Huggins parameter χ, radial distribution function (RDF) and morphologies are analyzed. It shows that the blends with more content of styrene in SAN (above 90 wt%), whose mass percentage is 60%, are best miscible. For the systems of PPE/SAN added with SBM, the miscibility increases and then decreases with the increase of SBM content. A longer chain of styrene (S) in SBM leads to wrapped structure of PMMA by PB, wrapped by PS, resulting in decrease of the miscibility. From studies and simulation of χ and RDF, the best blend system for commercial and industrial use is the one with mass ratio of PPE/SAN/SBM 36/54/10, in which S content in SAN is above 90 wt%. For SBM, the ratio of chain length styrene (S)/butadiene (B) is lessthan 1, while B and M are the same in chain length. POLYM. COMPOS., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Blending of styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene copolymer with sulfonated vinyl aromatic polymers

Different polymers containing sulfonic groups attached to the phenyl rings were prepared by sulfonation of polystyrene (PS) and styrene‐block‐(ethylene‐co‐1‐butene)‐block‐styrene (SEBS). The sulfonation degree (SD) was varied between 1 and 20 mol% of the styrene units. Polyphase materials containing sulfonated units were prepared by blending styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (SBS), with both sulfonated PS and sulfonated SEBS in a Brabender mixer. Such a procedure was performed as an alternative route to direct sulfonation of SBS which is actually not selective towards benzene rings because of the great reactivity of the double bonds in polybutadiene (PB) blocks to sulfonation agents. Thermal and dynamic‐mechanic analysis, together with morphology characterization of the blends, is consistent with obtaining partially compatible blends characterized by higher T_g of the polystyrene domains and improved thermal stability. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Impact strength and elongation‐to‐break of compatibilized ternary blends of polypropylene,nylon 66, and polystyrene

The Izod impact strength and tensile elongation‐to‐break were measured for blends of nylon 66 and polystyrene in a polypropylene matrix with and without compatibilization by an ionomer resin (for nylon 66) and a styrene‐block‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐block‐styrene copolymer (for polystyrene). With 20% nylon 66 and 20% polystyrene, about 5% of each compatibilizer was optimal. When used together for the ternary blend, there seemed to be little gross interference (or synergism) between the compatibilizers. A comparison between binary blends suggests that what interaction does exists may be synergistic. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1800–1809, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Compatibility of polystyrene/polyolefin blends containing compatibilizing agents, 2. Extraction behavior

Polystyrene (PS)/polyolefin (PO) blends in various mixing ratios compatibilized by a triblock copolymer polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS) and a diblock copolymer polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethene‐co‐propene) (SEP) and subsequently γ‐irradiated were prepared. The blends have been subjected to extraction in different solvents (chloroform or toluene) for various periods of time to obtain porous films. The efficiency of the extraction and the morphology of the films have been assessed by infrared spectrometry (IR), optical and electronic microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetry (TG); glass transition, melting heat, thermal stability, overall kinetic parameters and weight losses have been evaluated. The extraction behavior is close related to compatibility of the components, so on the base of the obtained results optima compatibility ratios have been established.     

Toughening of epoxy thermosets with polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐ polystyrene triblock copolymer via formation of nanostructures

In this contribution, we reported to utilize polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene (PS‐b‐PB‐b‐PS), a commercial triblock copolymer to toughen epoxy thermosets. First, a PS‐b‐PB‐b‐PS triblock copolymer was chemically modified with hydroboration‐oxidation reaction, with which the midblock was hydroxylated whereas the endblocks remained unaffected. It was found that the degree of hydroxylation was well controlled. One of the hydroxylated PS‐b‐PB‐b‐PS samples was then used as the macromolecular initiator to synthesize a poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐grafted PS‐b‐PB‐b‐PS via the ring‐opening polymerization. It was found that the PS‐b‐PB‐b‐PS with poly(ε‐caprolactone) grafts can be successfully employed to nanostructure epoxy thermosets; the “core‐shell” microdomains composed of PB and PS were generated in the nanostructured thermosets. The nanostructured thermosets displayed improved fracture toughness. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:2387–2396, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Charge storage of ternary polymer blends based on poly(phenylene ether)

BACKGROUND: Charge storage capability is a fundamental property of polymers used in electromechanical transducer applications. In this work, the charge retention of ternary blends of poly(phenylene ether) and polystyrene modified with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile), polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene or polystyrene‐block‐polyisobutylene‐block‐polystyrene (SIBS) triblock copolymers was correlated with the blend composition, final morphology and the chemical structure of the components. RESULTS: It was determined that the charge storage capability is favoured by a finely dispersed and non‐interconnected phase and can be reduced by high polarity or low molecular weight of the blend components. Additionally, the molecular weight and the amount of styrene of the copolymers also determined the phase morphology, which in turn affected the charge retention. The use of SIBS for the ternary blends, especially in small quantities, significantly improved the charge storage. As such, 100 µm films with a surface potential of about 400 V were able to retain up to 240 V (60%) after 24 h at 130 °C. CONCLUSION: The electret behaviour of the polymer blends was influenced by a complex relationship between chemical structure, molecular weight and phase morphology. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Thermoreversible gelation of a polystyrene–poly(ethylene/butylene)–polystyrene triblock copolymer in n‐octane/4‐methyl‐2‐pentanone solutions

The thermoreversible gelation of a triblock copolymer polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene in n‐octane and two solvent mixtures of n‐octane and 4‐methyl‐2‐pentanone with a high n‐octane content has been studied. n‐Octane and 4‐methyl‐2‐pentanone are selective solvents for the middle poly(ethylene/butylene) block and the end polystyrene blocks, respectively. The influence of the solvent composition on the sol–gel transition and the mechanical properties of the gels was studied. The gel formation temperature increased with the copolymer concentration and the n‐octane content in the solvent system. The mechanical properties of the different gels were studied through oscillatory shear measurements. The concentration dependence of the elastic storage modulus showed an exponent close to that expected for gels in good solvents (2.25) that possess a structure similar to those of chemical networks. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

A block copolymer nanotemplate for mechanically tunable polarized emission from a conjugated polymer

A polymer blend system consisting of polystyrene grafted onto poly (p-phenylene ethynylene) (PS-g-PPE) and poly (styrene-block-isoprene-block-styrene) triblock copolymer (SIS) yields highly polarized emission due to the unidirectional alignment of the PPE molecules. During the roll casting, the triblock copolymer microphase separates and creates unidirectionally aligned PS cylindrical microdomains in the rubbery PI matrix. PPE, a fluorescent conjugated polymer, was grafted with polystyrene (PS) side chains that enabled sequestration and alignment of these rigid backbone emitter molecules into the PS microdomains of the SIS triblock copolymer. Deforming the thermoplastic elastomer in a direction perpendicular to the orientation direction of the cylinders causes rotation of the PS cylinders and the PPE emitter molecules and affords tunable polarized emission due to re-orientation of the PPE containing PS cylinders as well as film thinning from Poisson effect.     

Morphology and rheological behavior of maltene–polymer blends. I. Effect of partial hydrogenation of poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene‐block)‐type copolymers

Because of the importance of the maltene–polymer interaction for the better performance of polymer‐modified asphalts, this article reports the effects of the molecular characteristics of two commercial poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene‐block) (SBS) polymers and their partially hydrogenated derivatives [poly{styrene‐block[(butadiene)_1?x–(ethylene‐co‐butylene)_x]‐block‐styrene‐block} (SBEBS)] on the morphology and rheological behavior of maltene–polymer blends (MPBs) with polymer concentrations of 3 and 10% (w/w). Each SBEBS and its parent SBS had the same molecular weight and polystyrene block size, but they differed from each other in the composition of the elastomeric block, which exhibited the semicrystalline characteristics of SBEBS. Maltenes were obtained from Ac‐20 asphalt (Pemex, Salamanca, Mexico), and the blends were prepared by a hot‐mixing procedure. Fluorescence microscopy images indicated that all the blends were heterogeneous, with polymer‐rich and maltene‐rich phases. The rheological behavior of the blends was determined from oscillatory shear flow data. An analysis of the storage modulus, loss modulus, complex modulus, and phase angle as a function of the oscillatory frequency at various temperatures allowed us to conclude that the maltenes behaved as pseudohomogeneous viscoelastic materials that could dissipate stress without presenting structural changes; moreover, all the MPBs were more viscoelastic than the neat maltenes, and this depended on both the characteristics and amount of the polymer. The MPBs prepared with SBEBS were more viscoelastic and possessed higher elasticity than those prepared with SBS. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Compatibilizing Effect of SEBS for Electrical Properties of LDPE/PS Blends

Summary: In the previous study, we observed compatibilizing effects of low density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) with polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS), a triblock copolymer. Blends consisting of 70 wt.‐% LDPE and 30 wt.‐% PS were prepared with a SEBS concentration of up to 10 wt.‐%. This study examined the electrical properties such as the electrical breakdown, water tree length, permittivity and tan δ in the blends. The possibility of using these blends as insulating material substitutes for LDPE was investigated. The electrical breakdown strength reached a maximum of 66.67 kV/mm, which is superior to 50.27 kV/mm of the LDPE used as electrical insulators for cables. In addition, the water tree length decreased with increasing SEBS concentration. The water tree lengths of the blends containing SEBS were shorter than that of the LDPE. The permittivity of the blends was 2.28–2.48 F/m, and decreased with increasing SEBS concentration with the exception of S‐0. Tan δ of the blends increased smoothly with increasing SEBS content.

Breakdown strength , water tree length, permittivity and tan δ of the LDPE/PS/SEBS blends and raw materials.     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

AB‐ and ABC‐type di‐ and triblock copolymers of poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] and poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐lactide]: synthesis,characterization and thermal studies

Polystyrene terminated with benzyl alcohol units was employed as a macroinitiator for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L ‐lactide to yield AB‐ and ABC‐type block copolymers. Even though there are many reports on the diblock copolymers of poly(styrene‐block‐lactide) and poly(styrene‐block‐lactone), this is the first report on the poly(styrene‐block‐lactone‐block‐lactide) triblock copolymer consisting of two semicrystalline and degradable segments. The triblock copolymers exhibited twin melting behavior in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis with thermal transitions corresponding to each of the lactone and lactide blocks. The block derived from ε‐caprolactone also showed crystallization transitions upon cooling from the melt. In the DSC analysis, one of the triblock copolymers showed an exothermic transition well above the melting temperature upon cooling. Thermogravimetric analysis of these block copolymers showed a two‐step degradation curve for the diblock copolymer and a three‐step degradation for the triblock copolymer with each of the degradation steps associated with each segment of the block copolymers. The present study shows that it is possible to make pure triblock copolymers with two semicrystalline segments which also consist of degradable blocks. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis,properties and thermal stability of water‐soluble poly(potassium 1‐hydroxyacrylate‐co‐styrene) copolymer

The present work investigates the structure properties of copolymers using thermogravimetric analysis, hot stage microscopy, static light scattering, field emission scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction analysis and a Brookfield viscometer. Poly(potassium 1‐hydroxyacrylate) (PKHA) is a water‐soluble polymer. However, the copolymer of styrene and 2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylene‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4‐one is not water soluble at equal molar ratio because the polystyrene reduces the solubility. The effect of styrene on poly(potassium 1‐hydroxyacrylate‐co‐styrene) copolymer, i.e. poly(KHA‐co‐St), was investigated for the increasing solubility of the copolymer. The solubility was increased at a lower molar ratio of styrene such as 0.4 in the copolymer. It was found that the copolymer was soluble in water when a content ratio of 68/32 mol% of homopolymer was incorporated in poly(KHA₆₈‐co‐St₃₂) copolymer as determined by NMR analysis. Also the poly(KHA₆₈‐co‐St₃₂) copolymer was found to be salt tolerant, possessed water absorption capacity and was thermally stable up to 183 °C. Moreover, it is shown that the polystyrene content plays a key role in the thermal stability of the copolymer. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nanostructured polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐polybutadiene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers modified with polystyrene and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymers

Morphologies of polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐ polybutadiene‐b ‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) triblock copolymer were predicted, adopting the phase diagram proposed by Stadler and co‐workers for neat SBM block copolymer, and were experimentally proved using atomic force microscopy. All investigated polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymer modified with polystyrene (PS) and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) homopolymers showed the expected nanostructures. For polymer blends of symmetric SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with PS homopolymer, the cylinders in cylinders core?shell morphology and the perforated lamellae morphology were obtained. Moreover, modifying the same SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with both PS and PMMA homopolymers the cylinders at cylinders morphology was reached. The predictions for morphologies of blends based on asymmetric SBM‐2 triblock copolymer were also confirmed experimentally, visualizing a spheres over spheres structure. This work presents an easy way of using PS and/or PMMA homopolymers for preparing nanostructured polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymers with desired morphologies, similar to those of neat SBM block copolymers. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Gas permeability of thin dense films from polymer blend of thermoplastic elastomer and polyolefin

Stretched thin films composed of a thermoplastic elastomer, a polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene butylene)‐block‐polystyrene triblock copolymer (SEBS), and polyolefins, poly(ethylene‐co‐ethylacrylate) and poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), were obtained by blow‐molding, uniaxial stretching, and cooling to room temperature and the gas permeability of the stretched films was investigated. When the as‐blown annealed film was subjected to uniaxial stretching in the machine direction, P_O2 and P_N2 increased with an increase in the stretching ratio K and approached a constant value at high stretching ratios. In addition, P_O2/P_N2 decreased gradually with K and approached a value of 2.95–3.0. The reason for this unique gas permeation behavior is that the molecular mobility of poly(ethylene butylene) chains in a direction normal to the film increases and reaches an equilibrium state at around K = 4.5. The change in gas permeability of the stretched films can be explained using a deformation model for the SEBS matrix. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 39386.     

Morphology and mechanical properties of high‐impact polystyrene/elastomer/magnesium hydroxide composites

Ternary composites of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS), elastomer, and magnesium hydroxide filler encapsulated by polystyrene were prepared to study the relationships between their structure and mechanical properties. Two kinds of morphology were formed. Separation of elastomer and filler was found when a nonpolar poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] triblock copolymer (SEBS) was incorporated. Encapsulation of filler by elastomer was achieved by using the corresponding maleinated SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties of ternary composites were strongly dependent on microstructure. In this study, the composites with separate dispersion structure showed higher elongation, modulus and impact strength than those of encapsulation structure. Impact‐fracture surface observation showed that the toughening mechanism was mainly due to the massive cavitation and extensive matrix yielding. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102:5184–5190, 2006     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of compatibility between tackifier and polymer on adhesion property and phase structure: Tackifier‐added polystyrene‐based triblock/diblock copolymer blend system

The effects of compatibility of tackifier with polymer matrix and mixing weight ratio of triblock/diblock copolymers as the matrix on the adhesion property and phase structure of tackifier‐added polystryrene triblock/diblock copolymer blends were investigated. For this purpose, polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene triblock and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene diblock copolymers were used and the diblock weight ratio in the blend was varied from 0 to 1. Spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene (PI) continuous phase. In the case of the hydrogenated cycloaliphatic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with PI and a poor compatibility with polystyrene, the peel strength increased with an increase of the tackifier content, and the degree of increase became significant above 40 wt % of tackifier. It was found that the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier in the PI matrix were formed and the distance between the nearest neighbors of agglomerates was about 15 nm from SAXS measurement. The peel strength increased with an increase of the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier from TEM observation. On the other hand, in the case of the rosin phenolic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with both polystyrene and PI, the peel strength increased effectively at the lower tackifier content, while no significant increase at higher tackifier content was observed. The agglomerates of tackifier were never confirmed in this system. The higher peel strength was obtained at the diblock weight ratio in the blend of 0.5–0.7 for both tackifier‐added systems. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011