Kinetics of isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/ liquid crystalline polymer blends

The melting behavior and isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (LCP), Vectra A950 (VA) blends were studied by using differential scanning calorimetry. Isothermal crystallization experiments were performed at crystallization temperatures (T_c), of 190, 195, 200 and 205°C from the melt (300°C) and analyzed based on the Avrami equation. The values of the Avrami exponent indicate that the PBT crystallization process in PBT/VA blends is governed by three‐dimensional morphology growth preceded by heterogeneous nucleation. The overall crystallization rate of PBT in the melt blends is enhanced by the presence of VA. However, the degree of PBT crystallinily remains almost the same. The analysis of the melting behavior of these blends indicates that the stability and the reorganization process of PBT crystals in blends are dependent on the blend compositions and the thermal history. The fold surface interfacial energy of PBT in blends is more modified than in pure PBT. Analysis of the crystallization data shows that crystallization occurs in Regime II across the temperature range 190°C‐205°C. A kinetic treatment based on the combination of Avrami and Ozawa equations, known as Liu's approach, describes the non‐isothermal crystallization. It is observed that at a given cooling rate the VA blending increases the overall crystallization rate of PBT.     

Biodegradable poly(L‐lactic acid)/poly(butylene succinate‐co‐adipate) blends: Miscibility,morphology, and thermal behavior

Blends of two biodegradable and semicrystalline polymers, poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) and poly(butylene succinate‐co‐adipate) (PBSA), were prepared by solvent casting in different compositions. The miscibility, morphology, and thermal behavior of the blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. PLLA was found to be immiscible with PBSA as evidenced by two independent glass transitions and biphasic melt. Nonisothermal crystallization measurements showed that fractionated crystallization behavior occurred when PBSA was dispersed as droplets, evidenced by multiple crystallization peaks at different supercooling levels. Crystallization and morphology of the blends were also investigated through two‐step isothermal crystallization. For blends where PLLA was the major component, different content of PBSA did not make a significant difference in the crystallization mechanism and rate of PLLA. For blends where PBSA was the major component, the crystallization rate of PBSA decreased with increasing PLLA content, while the crystallization mechanism did not change. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Crystallization behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of PLLA blended with ionic liquid, 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium dibutylphosphate

The crystallization behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of neat poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) and PLLA blended with ionic liquid (IL), 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium dibutylphosphate, were researched by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing optical microscopy (POM), and wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WXRD). Similar to the non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of neat PLLA, when PLLA melt was cooled from 200 to 20°C at a cooling rate of 10°C min^?1, no crystallization peak was detected yet with the incorporation of IL. However, the glass transition temperature and cold crystallization temperature of PLLA gradually decreased with the increase of IL content. It can be attributed to the significant plasticizing effect of IL, which improved the chain mobility and cold crystallization ability of PLLA. Isothermal crystallization kinetics was also analyzed by DSC and described by Avrami equation. For neat PLLA and IL/PLLA blends, the Avrami exponent n was almost in the range of 2.5–3.0. It is found that t_1/2 reduced largely, and the crystallization rate constant k increased exponentially with the incorporation of IL. These results show that the IL could accelerate the overall crystallization rate of PLLA due to its plasticizing effect. In addition, the dependences of crystallization rate on crystallization temperature and IL content were discussed in detail according to the results obtained by DSC and POM measurements. It was verified by WXRD that the addition of IL could not change the crystal structure of PLLA matrix. All samples isothermally crystallized at 100°C formed the α‐form crystal. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41308.     

Miscibility and crystallization behaviors of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate‐co‐butylene terephthalate)/phenoxy blends

Miscibility and crystallization behaviors of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate‐co‐butylene terephthalate) (PBST)/poly(hydroxyl ether biphenyl A) (phenoxy) blends were investigated with various techniques in this work. PBST and phenoxy are completely miscible as evidenced by the single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature over the entire blend compositions. Nonisothermal melt crystallization peak temperature is higher in neat PBST than in the blends at a given cooling rate. Isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PBST was studied and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rate of PBST decreases with increasing crystallization temperature and the phenoxy content in the PBST/phenoxy blends; however, the crystallization mechanism of PBST does not change. Moreover, blending with phenoxy does not modify the crystal structure but reduces the crystallinity degree of PBST in the PBST/phenoxy blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Crystallization behavior and crystallite morphology control of poly(L‐lactic acid) through N,N′‐bis(benzoyl)sebacic acid dihydrazide

Adding a nucleating agent is one of the best ways to accelerate the crystallization rate of poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) so as to obtain a high degree of crystallinity during the process, which will improve the heat distortion temperature of final products. In the work reported, N, N′‐bis(benzoyl)sebacic acid dihydrazide (BSAD) was synthesized and used as a nucleating agent for PLLA. Isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization behaviors were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The addition of BSAD successfully enhances the crystallization rate of PLLA. A unique phase separation behavior of PLLA/BSAD blends is found from DSC as well as from polarized optical microscopy, which explains the difference of optimal BSAD concentration between isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization. This is the first recording of a phase separation peak in PLLA/nucleating agent blends using DSC. In thermogravimetric analysis, the enhanced thermal stability indicates that there are strong hydrogen bonds between BSAD and PLLA matrix. BSAD can dissolve in PLLA melt below its melting point through intermolecular hydrogen bonding with PLLA and self‐assemble upon cooling, leading to the surface being capable of nucleating PLLA. Different phase separation temperatures can be used to control the morphology of BSAD, which finally determines the crystallite morphology of PLLA. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization and melting behavior of partially miscible six‐armed poly(l‐lactic acid)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) blends

The crystallization kinetics and spherulitic morphology of six‐armed poly(L‐lactic acid) (6a‐PLLA)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co?3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) crystalline/crystalline partially miscible blends were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and polarized optical microscopy in this study. Avrami analysis was used to describe the isothermal crystallization process of the neat polymers and their blends. The results suggest that blending had a complex influence on the crystallization rate of the two components during the isothermal crystallization process. Also, the crystallization mechanism of these blends was different from that of the neat polymers. The melting behavior of these blends was also studied after crystallization at various crystallization temperatures. The crystallization of PHBV at 125°C was difficult, so no melting peaks were found. However, it was interesting to find a weak melting peak, which arose from the PHBV component for the 20/80 6a‐PLLA/PHBV blend after crystallization at 125°C, and it is discussed in detail. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42548.     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly (butylene terephthalate)–poly (ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate‐co‐sebacate) segmented copolyesters

In this paper, two different analytical methods were applied to investigate nonisothermal crystallization behavior of copolyesters prepared by melting transesterification processing from bulk polyesters involving poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary amorphous random copolyester poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate‐co‐sebacate) (PETIS). The results show that the half‐time of crystallization of copolyesters depended on the reaction time and decreased with the content of ternary polyesters in the amorphous segment. The modified Avrami model describes the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics very well. The values of the Avrami exponent range from 2.2503 to 3.7632, and the crystallization kinetics constant ranges from 0.0690 to 0.9358, presenting a mechanism of three‐dimensional spherulitic growth with heterogeneous nucleation. Ozawa analysis, however, failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of copolyesters, especially at higher cooling rate. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1232–1238, 2003     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(l‐lactide)/poly(butylene succinate) blends through polyester maleation: from materials to properties

The melt blending of poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) with biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) is considered with a view to fine‐tuning its mechanical properties and its degradability. For this purpose, both maleic‐anhydride‐grafted PLLA (PLLA‐g‐MA) and maleic‐anhydride‐grafted PBS (PBS‐g‐MA) were prepared and used as reactive compatibilizers. The influence of PBS melt viscosity on the morphology and mechanical properties of PLLA/PBS blends was studied. Interestingly, the blending of low viscosity PBS with PLLA allows PLLA to be toughened while the use of high viscosity PBS led to PLLA/PBS blends exhibiting co‐continuous morphology. The nanostructure of the co‐continuous blends may be tuned through the joint action of organo‐modified clays and reactive compatibilizers. The effect of PBS on PLLA degradability was also investigated. The accelerated weathering testing of blends reveals that such combination of biodegradable polymers allows their degradability rate to be tailored. It is found that the addition of 20 wt% PBS to PLLA allows the molar mass loss fraction to be doubled after 425 h of testing. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry     

Rheological and thermal properties of blends of modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) with p‐acetoxybenzoic acid and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Blending of thermotropic liquid crystalline polyesters (LCPs) with conventional polymers could result in materials that can be used as an alternative for short fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites, because of their low melt viscosity as well as their inherent high stiffness and strength, high use temperature, and excellent chemical resistance and low coefficient of expansion. In most of the blends was used LCP of 40 mol % of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and 60 mol % of p‐acetoxybenzoic acid (PABA). In this work, blends of several copolyesters having various PABA compositions from 10 to 70 mol % and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) were prepared and their rheological and thermal properties were investigated. For convenience, the copolyesters were designated as PETA‐x, where x is the mol % of PABA. It was found that PET‐60 and PET‐70 copolyesters decreased the melt viscosity of PBT in the blends and those PBT/PETA‐60 and PBT/PETA‐70 blends showed different melt viscosity behaviors with the change in shear rate, while blends of PBT and PET‐x having less than 50 mol % of PABA exhibited totally different rheological behaviors. The blends of PBT with PETA‐50, PETA‐60, and PETA‐70 showed the morphology of multiple layers of fibers. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1797–1806, 1999     

Characterization of the mechanical and thermal properties and morphological behavior of biodegradable poly(L‐lactide)/poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(L‐lactide)/poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L‐lactate) polymeric blends

Two series of biodegradable polymer blends were prepared from combinations of poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) with poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L ‐lactate) (PBSL) in proportions of 100/0, 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30 (based on the weight percentage). Their mechanical properties were investigated and related to their morphologies. The thermal properties, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and melt flow index analysis of the binary blends and virgin polymers were then evaluated. The addition of PCL and PBSL to PLLA reduced the tensile strength and Young's modulus, whereas the elongation at break and melt flow index increased. The stress–strain curve showed that the blending of PLLA with ductile PCL and PBSL improved the toughness and increased the thermal stability of the blended polymers. A morphological analysis of the PLLA and the PLLA blends revealed that all the PLLA/PCL and PLLA/PBSL blends were immiscible with the PCL and PBSL phases finely dispersed in the PLLA‐rich phase. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Increasing the compatibility of poly(l‐lactide)/poly(para‐dioxanone) blends through the addition of poly(para‐dioxanone‐co‐l‐lactide)

To modify the mechanical properties of a poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA)/poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) 85/15 blend, poly(para‐dioxanone‐co‐l ‐lactide) (PDOLLA) was used as a compatibilizer. The 85/15 PLLA/PPDO blends containing 1–5 wt % of the random copolymer PDOLLA were prepared by solution coprecipitation. Then, the thermal, morphological, and mechanical properties of the blends with different contents of PDOLLA were studied via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and tensile testing, respectively. The DSC result revealed that the addition of PDOLLA into the blends only slightly changed the thermal properties by inhibiting the crystallization degree of the poly(l ‐lactide) in the polymer blends. The SEM photos indicated that the addition of 3 wt % PDOLLA into the blend was ideal for making the interface between the PLLA and PPDO phases unclear. The tensile testing result demonstrated that the mechanical properties of the blends containing 3 wt % PDOLLA were much improved with a tensile strength of 48 MPa and a breaking elongation of 214%. Therefore, we concluded that the morphological and mechanical properties of the PLLA/PPDO 85/15 blends could be tailored by the addition of the PDOLLA as a compatibilizer and that the blend containing a proper content of PDOLLA had the potential to be used as a medical implant material. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41323.     

Crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene octene) blends: Isothermal crystallization

Poly(ethylene‐octene) (POE), maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene‐octene) (mPOE), and a mixture of POE and mPOE were added to poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) to prepare PBT/POE, PBT/mPOE, and PBT/mPOE/POE blends by a twin‐screw extruder. Observation by scanning electron microscopy revealed improved compatibility between PBT and POE in the presence of maleic anhydride groups. The melting behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimeter; the kinetics data was delineated by kinetic models. The addition of POE or mPOE did not affect the melting behavior of PBT in samples quenched in water after blending in an extrude. Subsequent DSC scans of isothermally crystallized PBT and PBT blends exhibited two melting endotherms (T_mI and T_mII). T_mI was the fusion of the crystals grown by normal primary crystallization and T_mII was the melting peak of the most perfect crystals after reorganization. The dispersed second phase hindered the crystallization; on the other hand, the well dispersed phases with smaller size enhanced crystallization because of higher nucleation density. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Disclosing the crystallization behavior and morphology of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) within poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)/poly(l‐lactide) blends

In this work, the effect of poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) components on the crystallization behavior and morphology of poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) within PCL/PLLA blends was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, DSC, SEM and AFM. Morphological results reveal that PCL forms banded spherulites in PCL/PLLA blends because the interaction between the two polymer components facilitates twisting of the PCL lamellae. Additionally, the average band spacing of PCL spherulites monotonically decreases with increasing PLLA content. With regard to the crystallization behaviors of PCL, the crystallization ability of PCL is depressed with increase of the PLLA content. However, it is interesting to observe that the growth rate of PCL spherulites is almost independent of the PLLA content while the overall isothermal crystallization rate of PCL within PCL/PLLA blends decreases first and then increases at a given crystallization temperature, indicating that the addition of PLLA components shows a weak effect on the growth rate of the PCL but mainly on the generation of nuclei. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(lactic acid) blends

Thermal properties and non‐isothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. The blends exhibit single and composition‐dependent glass transition temperature, cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) and melt crystallization peak temperature (T_mc) over the entire composition range, implying miscibility between the PLA and PTT components. The T_cc values of PTT/PLA blends increase, while the T_mc values decrease with increasing PLA content, suggesting that the cold crystallization and melt crystallization of PTT are retarded by the addition of PLA. The modified Avrami model is satisfactory in describing the non‐isothermal melt crystallization of the blends, whereas the Ozawa method is not applicable to the blends. The estimated Avrami exponent of the PTT/PLA blends ranges from 3.25 to 4.11, implying that the non‐isothermal crystallization follows a spherulitic‐like crystal growth combined with a complicated growth form. The PTT/PLA blends generally exhibit inferior crystallization rate and superior activation energy compared to pure PTT at the same cooling rate. The greater the PLA content in the PTT/PLA blends, the lower the crystallization rate and the higher the activation energy. Moreover, the introduction of PTT into PLA leads to an increase in the thermal stability behavior of the resulting PTT/PLA blends. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Phase behavior of blends containing amorphous poly(resorcinol phthalate‐block‐carbonate) and semicrystalline polyesters

The phase behavior of poly(resorcinol phthalate‐block‐carbonate) (RPC) with engineering polyesters was investigated by using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis. RPC was found to form miscible blends with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), and poly(cyclohexylmethylene terephthalate) (PCT), but was partially miscible with poly(1,4‐cyclohexanedimethylene‐1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate) (PCCD) in the melt state and below the melting temperature (T_m). The degree of melting‐point depression indicates that the RPC is most miscible with PCT followed by PET and then PBT. Furthermore, with the help of empirical DSC data and the Nishi–Wang equation, the interaction parameters between RPC and PET, PBT, and PCT were quantified to be ?0.36, ?0.33, and ?0.54, respectively. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Development of novel biopolymer blends based on poly(l‐lactic acid), poly((R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate), and plasticizer

Poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA), a biopolymer that can be derived from renewable resources, is known for its brittleness as a result of slow crystallization rates under supercooling conditions, which is associated with the formation of large spherulites. In addition, the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PLLA is 60°C, such that the polymer chain is immobile at room temperature. These disadvantages make PLLA unsuitable for use in the food packaging sector. In this research, biopolymer blends based on PLLA and poly((R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), together with tributyl citrate (TBC) as a plasticizer, were developed. TBC was added to increase polymer chain mobility, and to decrease PLLA T_g from 60 to 10°C in blends. Furthermore, the addition of PHB as a nucleating agent to PLLA resulted in an increased proportion of smaller spherulites. Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy indicated that the carbonyl group and several other characteristic peaks in blends are shifted to lower wavenumber. In addition, polarized optical microscopy experiments confirmed the results of differential scanning calorimetry, FT‐IR, and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, showing that PHB enhances the crystallization behavior by acting as a bionucleation. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:1394–1402, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of size and shape of dispersed poly(butylene terephthalate) on isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(lactic acid) blends

The isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blends containing three different sizes of both spherical and fibrous poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) domains have been comparatively investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). The dynamic DSC measurement reveals that PBT domains significantly increase the degree of crystallinity of the PLA. Furthermore, the Avrami model is employed to evaluate the crystallization kinetics under isothermal conditions and it is found that PBT acts as nucleating agent, leading to a high overall crystallization rate constant k and shortened crystallization half time t_1/2. Furthermore, the crystallization rate of PLA is promoted with the incorporation of PBT with a large specific surface area. The average Avrami index n of all samples lies within the range of 3.3 ? 4.0, suggesting that morphologies of PBT do not affect the nucleation mechanism; however, the depression of equilibrium melting temperature in the blends ascribes the reductions of perfectness and size of the PLA crystallites. Besides, the nucleation of PLA crystallites around PBT fibers is probably faster than those around PBT spheres because the PBT chains oriented at the fiber surface as a result of flow‐induced crystallization during melt stretching may serve as the primary nuclei for PLA chains to drastically crystallize at the fiber surface. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:258–268, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) with stereocomplexed polylactide as biodegradable nucleation agent

Crystallization kinetics behavior and morphology of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blended with of 2–10 wt% loadings of poly(L ‐ and D ‐lactic acid) (PLLA and PDLA) stereocomplex crystallites, as biodegradable nucleating agents, were studied using differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing‐light optical microscopy (POM), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). Blending PLLA with PDLA at 1:1 weight ratio led to formation of stereocomplexed PLA (sc‐PLA), which was incorporated as small crystalline nuclei into PHB for investigating melt‐crystallization kinetics. The Avrami equation was used to analyze the isothermal crystallization of PHB. The stereocomplexed crystallites acted as nucleation sites in blends and accelerated the crystallization rates of PHB by increasing the crystallization rate constant k and decreasing the half‐time (t_1/2). The PHB crystallization was nucleated most effectively with 10 wt% stereocomplexed crystallites, as evidenced byPOM results. The sc‐PLA complexes (nucleated PHB crystals) exhibit much small spherulite sizes but possess the same crystal cell morphology as that of neat PHB based on the WAXD result. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers