Acceptance and Species Identification of Turkey Steaks Prepared with Beef, Pork, Lamb, and Turkey Fat

Fabricated extruded steaks were prepared from turkey meat, salt, phosphate, and water plus 15% beef, pork, lamb, or turkey fat. The grilled samples recieved relatively high hedonic scores from a sensory panel. The flavor, juiciness, and overall quality of the samples made with pork, beef, and turkey fat were preferred significantly over the samples made with lamb fat. Panel members tended to consider all samples as being pork flavored. Beef, pork, or turkey fat could be used as the fat in a fabricated, extruded steak without affecting the relative acceptability of the cooked product.     

Palatability of Meat from Mule Deer

To determine the palatability of meat from mule deer, a 10-member trained sensory panel evaluated meat from seven mule deer harvested in Texas. Beef rib roast and venison rib roast, loin steaks and semimembranosus steaks, and ground meat patties (beef, venison, venison/beef, and venison/pork) were evaluated. Venison contained much less fat than beef. Beef was more palatable than venison except for tenderness. The main difference in palatability was that venison was less juicy than beef. Mixing ground venison with beef or pork increased the palatability of venison to that of ground beef.     

Contribution of lean,fat, muscle color and degree of doneness to pork and beef species flavor

Flavor is an important contributor to consumer acceptability of meat, our objective was to characterize the impact of species-specific fat/lean sources, fat level, degree of doneness and muscle color are on pork and beef flavor. Three separate experiments were conducted. Patties were formulated differently for each experiment in order to evaluate the desired variables. Experiment. 1: Flavor from combination patties (same species lean/fat or combination of species lean/fat) was not impacted by degree of doneness (66 °C vs. 71 °C). Beef flavor was highest in samples made with beef lean, regardless of species fat type. Pork flavor was highest in samples made with pork lean and had higher flavor intensity scores. Experiment. 2: Beef flavor was not increased in all-beef patties formulated with higher fat levels. Pork patties formulated with higher fat content increased pork flavor. Experiment. 3: All-beef and all-pork patties formulated with light or dark lean did not impact flavor in either species.     

Palatability and Appearance Traits of Beef/Pork Meat Patties

Eight beef/pork ground meat blends were made from mature (cows or sows) and youthful (steers or barrow) beef and/or pork lean. Blends were stored at — 27°C for either 14 or 150 days. Storage time decreased overall desirability scores of blends made with 20% pork fat and 80% youthful beef lean. No differences were found for flavor or overall desirability scores within the 14-day storage treatment. The consumer panel did not detect differences among treatments for source of fat or species. Results indicated beef/pork patties containing 40–80% mature lean and a minimum of 10% beef fat were equal to all-beef controls (100% beef patty) for visual and palatability traits.     

Changes in the composition of the fatty acids and aldehydes of meat lipids after heating

The effects of heating at 132°C on the fatty acids and fatty aldehydes of neutral lipids and phospholipids of lean beef, veal, lamb, pork and chicken were studied. Heating caused hydrolysis of the plasmalogens in the phospholipids, and varying amounts of the liberated fatty aldehydes were recovered in the neutral lipid fractions. Beef phosphatidyl choline lost more polyunsaturated fatty acids than that of the other meats. Beef and veal phosphatidyl ethanolamine lost more polyunsaturated fatty acid than that of lamb, pork or chicken, but the effect was obscured by the influx of fatty acids from elsewhere into this fraction after heating.     

Proximate Analysis of Cooked Chuck and Round Roasts from Two Beef Breed-Types on Two Feeding Regimes

Cooked roast samples from two beef breed-types and from two feeding regimes were assayed for proximate composition. Three muscle roasts from the round primal cut (semimembranosus, SM; semitendinosus, ST; biceps femoris, BF) were similar to each other in composition. Roasts from chuck primal cut (shoulder clod roasts) differed considerably in composition from round roasts: clod roasts were higher in fat and lower in moisture, protein and ash. Breed-type had minimal effect on proximate composition, but feeding regime did significantly affect composition. Beef fed a higher energy regime produced roasted meat which was higher in fat and lower in moisture content.     

A RESEARCH NOTE CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPANDED EXTRUDATES CONTAINING NONMEAT INGREDIENTS AND LAMB, PORK, OR BEEF

This study was conducted to evaluate chemical, physical, nutritional, and sensory properties and storage stability of expanded extrudates produced from blends of nonmeat ingredients and lamb, pork or beef. Raw material blends contained 24.2% lean meat, 22% corn starch, 49.75–50.24% defatted soy flour, 0–0.62% separable meat fat, and 3.40–3.58% added water, and processed at 162C. Total fat contents of dried extrudates containing lamb, pork, and beef (their extrudates designated as L, P, and B) were 4.51, 4.29, and 3.83%, respectively. Bulk density and sensory hardness scores were greater for L, the extrudates with more fat. L and P exhibited less lipid oxidation than B. This difference was not associated with product fat content or fatty acid composition; L and P contained more fat than B and the fat in P was more polyunsaturated.     

External Fat Cover Influence on Raw and Cooked Beef. 1. Fat and Moisture Content

SUMMARY: The fat content of beef semitendinosus muscle, raw and cooked at two oven temperatures, with and without the external fat cover, has been determined. Each muscle was divided into two, an anterior and a posterior roast. The external fat cover was removed from half of the total number of roasts, and all roasts were then cooked to an internal temperature of 58°C at an oven temperature of either 163° or 218°C. Two types of samples were analyzed for their moisture and fat content. These were a separable lean sample and a total sample. The total sample was composed of both the separable lean and the external fat cover. The moisture content of the lean samples was not affected by the oven temperature, the external fat cover or the end of the muscle used. The total samples had moisture contents that reflected the amount of crude fat present. The yield of crude fat from raw or cooked meat was not significantly altered by the use of a polar solvent in place of a nonpolar one. Both of the fat determination methods extracted significantly more fat from the cooked lean samples than from the comparable raw ones. The lean samples from meat roasted at 163°C contained significantly more extractable fat than the samples roasted at 218°C. The presence or absence of the external fat cover did not affect the amount of fat extracted from the cooked lean.     

PROCESSING, CHEMICAL, SENSORY AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF BACON-CHOPPED AND FORMED, MADE FROM PORK, BEEF, MUTTON AND CHEVON

By extruding alternating layers of chopped lean and fat tissue, bacon-chopped and formed (CF) products were processed from pork, beef, mutton and chevon lean and beef fat. Slabs processed from beef materials had less weight loss and changes in width and thickness during smoking than the other formulations. Various sensory and consumer panels found pork-bacon-CF product to rate highest among the four formulations for tenderness, flavor and overall satisfaction. This formulation was rated as being closest in sensory traits to commercial bacon. Chevon and mutton bacon-CF products were found to be less desirable in flavor. Inclusion of pork lean and fat with chevon and mutton lean can potentially improve the acceptability of bacon-CF processed with lean from these two species. However, this process and product appears promising as methods of increasing consumption of underutilized meat animal species.     

Effect of Fat Source and Color of Lean on Acceptability of Beef/Pork Patties

Twelve beef/pork meat blends were made from lean of mature beef and dark or mature pork carcasses. Meat blends containing about 20% beef fat were rated higher for appearance scores by a consumer panel than blends made with 20% pork fat. Visual acceptance of beef/pork patties was accomplished via use of all-beef fat and additionally by extending mature beef (MB) with mature pork (MP) or dark pork lean (DP). Agtron calorimetry scores indicate a minimum of 20% MB lean extended with 60% MP was needed to create the appropriate red color attractive to consumers. Use of 60% MP lean with about 20% beef fat resulted in patties acceptable to consumers for visual appearance and eating satisfaction.     

Nutrient Composition of Some Fresh and Cooked Retail Cuts of Veal

In order to account for changes in veal production technology and to provide more details than presently available, nutrient composition of the lean from milk-fed calves (Bob) and special fed veal (SFV) were determined. Values for proximate composition, cholesterol, 8 fatty acids, 8 vitamins, and 8 inorganic nutrients were obtained. Bob veal tended to have lower fat content and significantly (P<0.05) higher levels of cholesterol and Fe than SFV. Percent true retentions were above 100% for fat, cholesterol and energy content. Bob and SFV are good sources for niacin, vitamin B₁₂, P and Zn, but contain slightly higher amounts of cholesterol than literature values for beef, pork or lamb.     

Incidence of Listeria ssp. in Retail Meat Roasts

Interior muscle cores from 50 beef, 50 pork, and 10 lamb roasts, purchased at retail, were assayed for Listeria ssp., which was isolated from three beef roasts and three pork roasts, but not from lamb roasts. Five isolates of serotype la Listeria monocytogenes were obtained from the roasts, together with one strain each of Listeria innocua and Listeria welshimeri. Twice, L. monocytogenes was present at 10 CFU/ g; all other isolations of Listeria spp. required enrichment (<10 CFU/ g). The presence of listeriae in cores of whole-muscle meat roasts is probably not a result of environmental contamination, and may be due to antemortem exposure of the animal to Listeria.     

Evaluation of Antioxidant Effects of Raisin Paste in Cooked Ground Beef, Pork, and Chicken

ABSTRACT:  The objective of this study was to evaluate the possible antioxidant activity of raisin paste added to raw ground beef, pork, or chicken before cooking to 163 °C. Samples were held at 2 °C for up to 14 d. TBA values were measured using a distillation method, to avoid yellow color interference found in "wet" TBA methods. Sample meat flavor intensity, rancid flavor intensity, and raisin flavor intensity were evaluated by a trained panel (n = 6). Addition of raisin paste lowered ( p < 0.05) TBA values and decreased panel scores for rancid flavor scores of all meat samples in a concentration-dependent manner. Highest antioxidant effects were obtained with a minimum of 1.5%, 2.0%, or 2.0% raisin paste in cooked ground beef, pork, or chicken, respectively. There was a high correlation (0.93, 0.94, 0.94) between TBA values and sensory rancid flavor scores in beef, pork, and chicken samples respectively. Addition of a reducing sugar (glucose) was nearly as effective as raisins for maintenance of low TBA values and rancid flavor scores, probably due to antioxidant effects of Maillard browning products. There was no detectable raisin flavor in cooked ground beef samples with added raisins. However, all meats with added glucose had a higher raisin flavor intensity score than controls, indicating that panelists associated sweetness with raisin flavor. Maillard browning (sample darkening) was evident after cooking of ground chicken with either raisins or glucose.     

Comparisons of patties using mixtures of ground meat from beef, pork and chevaline

Sensory panels were used to evaluate five different ground meat products. The control product was ground beef and this was compared with products consisting of 70% beef and 30% pork; 50% beef, 30% pork, and 20% chevaline; 40% beef, 30% pork, and 30% chevaline; and 30% beef, 30% pork, and 40% chevaline. Analysis of sensory panel data revealed no significant difference (P < 0·05) in juiciness, flavor intensity, or flavor desirability. Raw and cooked samples of each of the five products were analyzed for proximate composition and were found to be comparable in nutritive value. There were small but non-significant differences in amino acid composition.     

Comparison of flavor changes in cooked-refrigerated beef, pork and chicken meat patties

Beef and pork longissimus dorsi (LD) and semimembranosus (SM) and chicken breast (B) and thigh (T) muscles excised 24 h postmortem were ground by muscle/species group, formed into patties, pan-fried, refrigerated for 0, 3 or 6 days, and evaluated by a trained sensory panel for intensity of specific flavors. The rate of decline in species-specific natural meat flavor intensity and the rate of increase in "cardboard" (CBD) flavor intensity during the first half of the 6-day storage were fastest for beef, while such decline and increase during the entire storage period were slowest for chicken B. Overall trends of natural meat flavor and CBD intensity changes for chicken T appeared more like those for the red meats than chicken B. It was concluded that, while flavor deterioration can occur in cooked-stored meats from all the species, quantitative or the magnitude of differences between species would depend on muscle types and sensory terms/method used.     

Acceptability of Flavor, Texture, and Appearance in Mutton Processed Meat Products Made by Smoking, Curing, Spicing, Adding Starter Cultures and Modifying Fat Source

Mutton meat was tested as the main ingredient, in different processed meat items to obtain prototype products lacking objectionable mutton off-flavors. Four consumer-preference sensory panel sessions were conducted to rate these products against beef or pork controls. Sensory panel results indicated that compared to texture and appearance parameters, flavor had more effect on overall acceptability of these products. Objectionable mutton flavor was apparently reduced by: (1) reducing mutton fat to a level of 10% or less, and (2) using spices, smoking, and/or curing.     

ACCEPTABILITY OF BEEF PATTIES EXTENDED WITH PORK AND/OR TEXTURED SOY PROTEIN1

Four beef or beef/pork ground meat blends were extended with textured soy protein (TSP) at 0, 10, 20 and 30% levels. Ground beef/pork/textured soy protein (TSP) patties with 30% TSP were rated lowest by consumers for raw color and appearance and overall cooked appearance. A beef (50%) and pork (30%) blend containing no TSP was rated highest by consumers for tenderness, flavor and overall desirability and higher by a trained sensory panel for flavor and overall desirability than blends containing TSP. Overall desirability ratings for visual and palatability characteristics of beef/pork meat patties were higher than for beef/pork/TSP blends. Results indicated a distinct advantage for palatability of the beef/pork blend as compared to beef/pork/TSP combinations.     

SELECTED SENSORY AND CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES OF CHICKEN BREAKFAST SAUSAGES FROM DIFFERENT ANIMAL FAT SOURCES

Four breakfast sausage formulations were prepared to contain: (1) chicken lean + chicken fat (CF), (2) chicken lean + beef fat (BF), (3) chicken lean + pork fat (PF), or (4) chicken lean + high-oleic pork fat (PO). Formulations were targeted to contain 15% fat. Acceptability, tenderness, juiciness and flavor scores for each of the formulations as measured by a consumer taste panel (n = 71), were not different (P> 0.05). Sausages prepared with CF had a higher (P < 0.05) cooking loss and lower fat content than those prepared with BF. Thibarbituric acid (TBA) values for PO were significantly lower than those containing BF, PF, or CF. Sausage products containing chicken fat exhibited the highest TBA values during 9 days of storage at 4°C. These results suggested that chicken, beef, pork or high-oleic fats can be used as the fat source in low-fat chicken breakfast sausages without affecting the product acceptability.     

不同烹调方式对羊肉品质的影响

研究不同烹调方式（蒸煮、烘烤和煎炸）对羊肉品质的影响,分别对样品中氨基酸、脂肪酸和核苷酸的组成及含量、质构指标以及肌肉微观结构进行检测。结果表明：蒸煮方式的损失率最低,对氨基酸、脂肪酸和核苷酸的组成及含量的影响最小;在3 种烹调方式对肉样处理过程中,肉样的氨基酸模式和脂肪酸模式均发生不同程度的变化;煎炸肉样中呈味氨基酸含量为55.33%,显著高于蒸煮肉样呈味氨基酸含量（50.67%）和烘烤肉样呈味氨基酸含量（49.33%）;烘烤肉样呈味核苷酸含量最低;蒸煮、煎炸和烘烤对肉样的脂肪酸组成及含量虽有影响,但组间并无差异显著性。烘烤肉样咀嚼性优于煎炸肉样和蒸煮肉样。在3 种烹调方式处理过程中,烘烤肉样肌纤维束变形、肌束膜破坏、肌间脂肪受损程度最严重。