Convergence control of single loop approach for reliability-based design optimization

For solution of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problems, single loop approach (SLA) shows high efficiency. Thus SLA is extensively used in RBDO. However, the iteration solution procedure by SLA is often oscillatory and non-convergent for RBDO with nonlinear performance function. This prevents the application of SLA to engineering design problems. In this paper, the chaotic single loop approach (CLSA) is proposed to achieve the convergence control of original iterative algorithm in SLA. The modification involves automated selection of the chaos control factor by solving a novel one-dimensional optimization model. Additionally, a new oscillation-checking method is constructed to detect the oscillation of iterative process of design variables. The computational capability of CLSA is demonstrated through five benchmark examples and one stiffened shell application. The comparison of numerical results indicates that CSLA is more efficient than the double loop approach and the decoupled approach. CSLA also solves the RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance function and non-normal random variables stably.     

Optimum values of structural safety factors for a predefined reliability level with extension to multiple limit states

In the field of deterministic structural optimization, the designer reduces the structural cost without taking into account uncertainties concerning materials, geometry and loading. This way, the resulting optimum solution may represent a lower level of reliability and thus a higher risk of failure. It is the objective of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) to design structures that should be both economic and reliable. The coupling between mechanical modeling, reliability analyses and optimization methods leads to very high computational costs and weak convergence stability. Since the traditional RBDO solution is achieved by alternating between reliability and optimization iterations, the structural designers performing deterministic optimization do not consider the RBDO model as a practical tool for the design of real structures. Fortunately, a hybrid method based on simultaneous solution of the reliability and the optimization problem, has successfully reduced the computational time problem. The hybrid method allows us to satisfy a required reliability level, but the vector of variables here contains both deterministic and random variables. The hybrid RBDO problem is thus more complex than that of deterministic design. The major difficulty lies in the evaluation of the structural reliability, which is carried out by a special optimization procedure. In this paper a new methodology is presented with the aim of finding a global solution to RBDO problems without additional computing cost for the reliability evaluation. The safety factor formulation for a single limit state case has been used to efficiently reduce the computational time . This technique is fundamentally based on a study of the sensitivity of the limit state function with respect to the design variables. In order to demonstrate analytically the efficiency of this methodology, the optimality condition is then used. The efficiency of this technique is also extended to multiple limit state cases. Two numerical examples are presented at the end of the paper to demonstrate the applicability of the new methodology.     

An enhanced simulation-based design method coupled with meta-heuristic search algorithm for accurate reliability-based design optimization

The enhanced weighted simulation-based design method in conjunction with particle swarm optimization (PSO) is developed as a pseudo double-loop algorithm for accurate reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). According to this hybrid method, generated samples of weighed simulation method (WSM) are considered as initial population of the PSO. The proposed population is then employed to evaluate the safety level of each PSO swarm (design candidates) during movement. Using this strategy, there is no required to conduct new sampling for reliability assessment of design candidates (PSO swarms). Employing PSO as the search engine of RBDO and WSM as the reliability analyzer provide more accurate results with few samples and also increase the application range of traditional WSM. Besides, a shift strategy is also introduced to increase the capability of the WSM to investigate general RBDO problems including both deterministic and random design variables. Several examples are investigated to demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the method. Results demonstrate the computational efficiency and superiority of the proposed method for practical engineering problems with highly nonlinear and implicit probabilistic constrains.     

Application of reliability-based optimization to earth-moving machine: hydraulic cylinder components design process

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) incorporates probabilistic analysis into optimization process so that an optimum design has a great chance of staying in the feasible design space when the inevitable variability in design variables/parameters is considered. One of the biggest drawbacks of applying RBDO to practical problem is its high computational cost that is often impractical to industries. In search of the most suitable RBDO method for industrial applications, we first evaluated several existing RBDO approaches in details such as the double-loop RBDO, the sequential optimization and reliability assessment, and the response surface method. Then, based on industry needs, a platform incorporating/integrating the existing algorithm of optimization and reliability analysis is built for a practical RBDO problem. Effectiveness of the proposed RBDO approach is demonstrated using a simple cantilever beam problem and a more complicated industry problem.     

Improved hybrid method as a robust tool for reliability-based design optimization

In the engineering problems, the randomness and the uncertainties of the distribution of the structural parameters are a crucial problem. In the case of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), it is the objective to play a dominant role in the structural optimization problem introducing the reliability concept. The RBDO problem is often formulated as a minimization of the initial structural cost under constraints imposed on the values of elemental reliability indices corresponding to various limit states. The classical RBDO leads to high computing time and weak convergence, but a Hybrid Method (HM) has been proposed to overcome these two drawbacks. As the hybrid method successfully reduces the computing time, we can increase the number of variables by introducing the standard deviations as optimization variables to minimize the error values in the probabilistic model. The efficiency of the hybrid method has been demonstrated on static and dynamic cases with extension to the variability of the probabilistic model. In this paper, we propose a modification on the formulation of the hybrid method to improve the optimal solutions. The proposed method is called, Improved Hybrid Method (IHM). The main benefit of this method is to improve the structure performance by much more minimizing the objective function than the hybrid method. It is also shown to demonstrate the optimality conditions. The improved hybrid method is next applied to two numerical examples, with consideration of the standard deviations as optimization variables (for linear and nonlinear distributions). When integrating the improved hybrid method within the probabilistic model variability, we minimize the objective function more and more.     

An efficient variable screening method for effective surrogate models for reliability-based design optimization

In the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) process, surrogate models are frequently used to reduce the number of simulations because analysis of a simulation model takes a great deal of computational time. On the other hand, to obtain accurate surrogate models, we have to limit the dimension of the RBDO problem and thus mitigate the curse of dimensionality. Therefore, it is desirable to develop an efficient and effective variable screening method for reduction of the dimension of the RBDO problem. In this paper, requirements of the variable screening method for deterministic design optimization (DDO) and RBDO are compared, and it is found that output variance is critical for identifying important variables in the RBDO process. An efficient approximation method based on the univariate dimension reduction method (DRM) is proposed to calculate output variance efficiently. For variable screening, the variables that induce larger output variances are selected as important variables. To determine important variables, hypothesis testing is used in this paper so that possible errors are contained in a user-specified error level. Also, an appropriate number of samples is proposed for calculating the output variance. Moreover, a quadratic interpolation method is studied in detail to calculate output variance efficiently. Using numerical examples, performance of the proposed method is verified. It is shown that the proposed method finds important variables efficiently and effectively     

Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information

In most industrial applications, only limited statistical information is available to describe the input uncertainty model due to expensive experimental testing costs. It would be unreliable to use the estimated input uncertainty model obtained from insufficient data for the design optimization. Furthermore, when input variables are correlated, we would obtain non-optimum design if we assume that they are independent. In this paper, two methods for problems with a lack of input statistical information—possibility-based design optimization (PBDO) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) with confidence level on the input model—are compared using mathematical examples and an Abrams M1A1 tank roadarm example. The comparison study shows that PBDO could provide an unreliable optimum design when the number of samples is very small. In addition, PBDO provides an optimum design that is too conservative when the number of samples is relatively large. Furthermore, the obtained PBDO designs do not converge to the optimum design obtained using the true input distribution as the number of samples increases. On the other hand, RBDO with confidence level on the input model provides a conservative and reliable optimum design in a stable manner. The obtained RBDO designs converge to the optimum design obtained using the true input distribution as the number of samples increases.     

A stability investigation of a simulation- and reliability-based optimization

This study developed a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) algorithm focusing on the ability of solving problems with nonlinear constraints or system reliability. In this case, a sampling technique is often adopted to evaluate the reliability analyses. However, simulation with an insufficient sample size often possesses statistical randomness resulting in an inaccurate sensitivity calculation. This may cause an unstable RBDO solution. The proposed approach used a set of deterministic variables, called auxiliary design points, to replace the random parameters. Thus, an RBDO is converted into a deterministic optimization (DO, α-problem). The DO and the analysis of finding the auxiliary design points (β-problem) are conducted iteratively until the solution converges. To maintain the stability of the RBDO solution with less computational cost, the proposed approach calculated the sensitivity of reliability (in the β-problem) with respect to the mean value of the pseudo-random parameters rather than the design variables. The stability of the proposed method was compared to that of the double-loop approach, and many factors, such as sample size, starting point and the parameters used in the optimization, were considered. The accuracy of the proposed method was confirmed using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with several linear and nonlinear numerical problems.     

Efficient reliability-based design optimization using a hybrid space with application to finite element analysis

The design of high technology structures aims to define the best compromise between cost and safety. The Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) allows us to design structures which satisfy economical and safety requirements. However, in practical applications, the coupling between the mechanical modelling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational time and weak convergence stability. Traditionally, the solution of the RBDO model is achieved by alternating reliability and optimization iterations. This approach leads to low numerical efficiency, which is disadvantageous for engineering applications on real structures. In order to avoid this difficulty, we propose herein a very efficient method based on the simultaneous solution of the reliability and optimization problems. The procedure leads to parallel convergence for both problems in a Hybrid Design Space (HDS). The efficiency of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on the design of a steel hook, where the RBDO is combined with Finite Element Analysis (FEA).     

An optimal shifting vector approach for efficient probabilistic design

The application of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is hindered by the unbearable computational cost in the structure reliability evaluating process. This study proposes an optimal shifting vector (OSV) approach to enhance the efficiency of RBDO. In OSV, the idea of using an optimal shifting vector in the decoupled method and the notation of conducting reliability analysis in the super-sphere design space are proposed. The shifted limit state function, instead of the specific performance function, is used to identify the inverse most probable point (IMPP) and derive the optimal shifting vector for accelerating the optimization process. The super-sphere design space is applied to reduce the number of constraints and design variables for the novel reliability analysis model. OSV is very efficient for highly nonlinear problems, especially when the contour lines of the performance functions vary widely. The computation capability of the proposed method is demonstrated and compared to existing RBDO methods using four mathematical and engineering examples. The comparison results show that the proposed OSV approach is very efficient.     

A self-adaptive modified chaos control method for reliability-based design optimization

In the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), the Advanced mean value (AMV) method sometimes yields unstable results such as chaotic and periodic solutions for highly nonlinear probabilistic constraints. The chaos control (CC), modified chaos control (MCC) and adaptive chaos control (ACC) methods are more robust than the AMV but inefficient for some moderately nonlinear performance functions. In this paper, a self-adaptive modified chaos control (SMCC) method is developed based on a dynamical control factor to improve the efficiency of MCC for reliability analysis and RBDO. The self-adaptive control factor is dynamically computed based on the new and previous results. The efficiency and robustness of the proposed SMCC are compared with the AMV, CC, MCC and ACC methods using several nonlinear structural/mathematical performance functions and RBDO problems. The results illustrate that the SMCC is more efficient than CC, MCC, and ACC methods, and also more robust than AMV method for highly nonlinear problems.     

Reliability-based design optimization for problems with interval distribution parameters

Traditional reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) generally describes uncertain variables using random distributions, while some crucial distribution parameters in practical engineering problems can only be given intervals rather than precise values due to the limited information. Then, an important probability-interval hybrid reliability problem emerged. For uncertain problems in which interval variables are included in probability distribution functions of the random parameters, this paper establishes a hybrid reliability optimization design model and the corresponding efficient decoupling algorithm, which aims to provide an effective computational tool for reliability design of many complex structures. The reliability of an inner constraint is an interval since the interval distribution parameters are involved; this paper thus establishes the probability constraint using the lower bound of the reliability degree which ensures a safety design of the structure. An approximate reliability analysis method is given to avoid the time-consuming multivariable optimization of the inner hybrid reliability analysis. By using an incremental shifting vector (ISV) technique, the nested optimization problem involved in RBDO is converted into an efficient sequential iterative process of the deterministic design optimization and the hybrid reliability analysis. Three numerical examples are presented to verify the proposed method, which include one simple problem with explicit expression and two complex practical applications.     

Reliability-based and deterministic design optimization of a FSAE brake pedal: a risk allocation analysis

While probabilistic designs can translate into significant weight savings through better risk allocation, deterministic design optimization remains widely used in industry. To promote the use of probabilistic designs among engineering students and practitioners, this work solves reliability based design optimization (RBDO) and deterministic design optimization (DDO) models of a FSAE brake pedal with multiple failure modes (stress and buckling) with their relative performance evaluated through a risk allocation analysis. The problems of interest were systematically solved through the following steps: i) topology optimization to specify the brake-pedal shape, ii) numerical 3D brake-pedal modeling under uncertainty for stress and buckling analysis, iii) mass (M), maximum von Mises stress (S_max) and buckling load factor (f_buck) surrogate modeling, iv) global sensitivity analysis and surrogate model selection, and v) surrogate-based RBDO and DDO with risk allocation analysis. Results show that when compared to DDO with alternative safety factors, for the same probability of system failure, the RBDO brake pedal designs were significantly lighter and more robust (less mass variability).     

Model uncertainty approximation using a copula-based approach for reliability based design optimization

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) has been widely used to design engineering products with minimum cost function while meeting reliability constraints. Although uncertainties, such as aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty, have been well considered in RBDO, they are mainly considered for model input parameters. Model uncertainty, i.e., the uncertainty of model bias indicating the inherent model inadequacy for representing the real physical system, is typically overlooked in RBDO. This paper addresses model uncertainty approximation in a product design space and further integrates the model uncertainty into RBDO. In particular, a copula-based bias modeling approach is proposed and results are demonstrated by two vehicle design problems.     

面向复杂装备精密产品质量特性的Kriging-RBDO可靠性优化设计

不确定设计参数情形下的复杂装备柔顺机构精密产品质量特性波动与可靠性疲劳退化是精密微机电系统领域的基础性工程难题.针对这一基础性工程难题,提出一种面向复杂装备柔顺机构精密产品可靠性优化设计模型.利用拉丁超立方试验设计(Latin hypercube design,LHD)构建试验设计组合方案,通过有限元数值模拟获取各试验设计组合方案的质量特性值.据此,采用Kriging代理模型建立质量特性与不确定设计参数之间复杂非线性函数关系模型.在此基础上,引入基于可靠性优化设计(Reliability-based design optimization,RBDO)策略,构建面向复杂装备柔顺机构精密产品Kriging-RBDO可靠性优化设计模型.算例表明,所提出的方法在不确定设计参数情形下的复杂装备柔顺机构精密产品早期质量设计方面具有良好的抗疲劳退化特性.     

Quantile-based optimization under uncertainties using adaptive Kriging surrogate models

Uncertainties are inherent to real-world systems. Taking them into account is crucial in industrial design problems and this might be achieved through reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) techniques. In this paper, we propose a quantile-based approach to solve RBDO problems. We first transform the safety constraints usually formulated as admissible probabilities of failure into constraints on quantiles of the performance criteria. In this formulation, the quantile level controls the degree of conservatism of the design. Starting with the premise that industrial applications often involve high-fidelity and time-consuming computational models, the proposed approach makes use of Kriging surrogate models (a.k.a. Gaussian process modeling). Thanks to the Kriging variance (a measure of the local accuracy of the surrogate), we derive a procedure with two stages of enrichment of the design of computer experiments (DoE) used to construct the surrogate model. The first stage globally reduces the Kriging epistemic uncertainty and adds points in the vicinity of the limit-state surfaces describing the system performance to be attained. The second stage locally checks, and if necessary, improves the accuracy of the quantiles estimated along the optimization iterations. Applications to three analytical examples and to the optimal design of a car body subsystem (minimal mass under mechanical safety constraints) show the accuracy and the remarkable efficiency brought by the proposed procedure.     

Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization

The efficiency and robustness of reliability analysis methods are important factors to evaluate the probabilistic constraints in reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). In this paper, a relaxed mean value (RMV) approach is proposed in order to evaluate probabilistic constraints including convex and concave functions in RBDO using the performance measure approach (PMA). A relaxed factor is adaptively determined in the range from 0 to 2 using an inequality criterion to improve the efficiency and robustness of the inverse first-order reliability methods. The performance of the proposed RMV is compared with six existing reliability methods, including the advanced mean value (AMV), conjugate mean value (CMV), hybrid mean value (HMV), chaos control (CC), modified chaos control (MCC), and conjugate gradient analysis (CGA) methods, through four nonlinear concave and convex performance functions and three RBDO problems. The results demonstrate that the proposed RMV is more robust than the AMV, CMV, and HMV for highly concave problems, and slightly more efficient than the CC, MCC, and CGA methods. Furthermore, the proposed relaxed mean value guarantees robust and efficient convergence for RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance functions.     

Robust seismic design optimization of steel structures

Stochastic performance measures can be taken into account, in structural optimization, using two distinct formulations: robust design optimization (RDO) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). According to a RDO formulation, it is desired to obtain solutions insensitive to the uncontrollable parameter variation. In the present study, the solution of a structural robust design problem formulated as a two-objective optimization problem is addressed, where cross-sectional dimensions, material properties and earthquake loading are considered as random variables. Additionally, a two-objective deterministic-based optimization (DBO) problem is also considered. In particular, the DBO and RDO formulations are employed for assessing the Greek national seismic design code for steel structural buildings with respect to the behavioral factor considered. The limit-state-dependent cost is used as a measure of assessment. The stochastic finite element problem is solved using the Monte Carlo Simulation method, while a modified NSGA-II algorithm is employed for solving the two-objective optimization problem.     

Projection-based two-phase minimum and maximum length scale control in topology optimization

The objective of this paper is a tradeoff between changing design and controlling sampling uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). The former is referred to as ‘living with uncertainty’, while the latter is called ‘shaping uncertainty’. In RBDO, a conservative estimate of the failure probability is defined using the mean and the upper confidence limit, which are obtained from samples and from the normality assumption. Then, the sensitivity of the conservative probability of failure is derived with respect to design variables as well as the number of samples. It is shown that the proposed sensitivity is much more accurate than that of the finite difference method and close to the analytical sensitivity. A simple RBDO example showed that once the design variables reach near the optimum point, the number of samples is adjusted to satisfy the conservative reliability constraints. This example showed that not only shifting design but also shaping uncertainty plays a critical role in the optimization process.     

Reliability-based optimization of design variance to identify critical tolerances

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a topic of interest for research in both academia and industry. RBDO typically involves adjusting the mean values of the design variables while fixing the spread parameters, often measured as variance, in order to accomplish a given objective within the stated constraints. This paper proposes an alternate way to meet given design criteria by fixing the mean values of the statistical inputs and allowing the spread parameters to become design variables. To do this, product cost models are proposed in terms of statistical variables. By performing this type of optimization, the design changes are kept to a minimum, and the focus is instead shifted to variance control. An initial study is performed on a three-bar truss subject to static loading with material variability. A more complex example is performed involving the cost minimization of an unmanned undersea vehicle subjected to hydrostatic buckling.