首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Presents the results of a Division 38 (the health psychology division of the American Psychological Association) survey of graduate training programs in psychology, along with facility-specific information on doctoral training opportunities in health psychology as of Fall 1981. 310 questionnaires were returned from psychology programs; 53 indicated that doctoral training in health psychology was available at their institution. It was found that established subspecialty programs were expanding to include health psychology, and new programs were developing in that area. (12 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

2.
A survey of 368 shopping mall patrons (mean age 37 yrs) showed that 49% listened to radio call-in psychology programs (RCPPs), although listening was usually relatively infrequent. Listeners did not differ from nonlisteners in terms of demographic variables, psychological knowledge or well-being, or previous experience with psychological services. 86% of listeners saw RCPPs as useful, although 50% also noted potential harmful effects. The most common reasons for listening were a desire for personal information, wanting to learn about psychology, the opportunity to hear about others' problems, and amusement. An additional survey of 122 RCPP callers showed that the group was predominantly female (65%) and most commonly lived alone, that a majority of Ss had previously received some psychological treatment, and that they showed poorer psychological health than Ss in the 1st survey. A postcall interview and 3-mo follow-up indicated an improvement in psychological well-being but no change in reported stress. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

3.
Questions G. W. Albee's (see record 1971-08263-001) conclusions concerning the desirability of training clinical psychologists in arts and sciences graduate schools; the psychiatric setting as inappropriate for apprenticeships; and the incompatibility of scientist-professional models. Rather, the proper meld of scientist-professional characteristics may offer the greatest hope for clinical psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

4.
There has been substantial debate over the value of concurrent accreditation of doctoral training programs and internships in Canada, both from the Canadian and the American psychological communities. Proponents of concurrent accreditation have argued that concurrent accreditation increases mobility for students and attracts foreign applicants to Canadian graduate programs. Advocates of sole accreditation by the Canadian Psychological Association have argued that there are substantial drawbacks in terms of divergent models, national differences in diversity, and the investment of time and money to maintain cross-national accreditation. In light of the recent decision by the Committee on Accreditation of the American Psychological Association to stop accrediting Canadian programs, this article reviews the past, present, and future state of accreditation in Canada. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

5.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical psychology and in counseling psychology" conducted by the institutions listed. Under "Doctoral Programs in Clinical Psychology" 57 institutions are listed; 7 of these have interim approval while the others are undifferentiated by any rating. Under "Doctoral Programs in Counseling Psychology" 24 institutions are listed; 1 of these has interim approval. From Psyc Abstracts 36:02:2AM12A. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

6.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical psychology and in counseling psychology" conducted by the institutions listed. Under "Doctoral Programs in Clinical Psychology" 52 institutions are listed; 10 of these are indicated as having received interim approval while the others are undifferentiated by any rating. Under "Doctoral Programs in Counseling Psychology" 26 institutions are listed; 7 of these have interim approval. The institutions listed "have been reported to the United States Public Health Service, to the Veterans Administration, and to The Surgeon General's Office, Department of the Army as conducting at the present time approved programs of doctoral training in areas indicated." (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

7.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical and in psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed… ." Of the 47 institutions indicated in the clinical psychology list, six are asterisked to indicate that the institutions have recently developed programs which meet minimum standards. Of the 25 institutions in the counseling psychology list, seven have been asterisked. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

8.
9.
A list of the APA approved training programs in clinical and counseling psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

10.
Presents the official listing of accredited doctoral programs. It reflects all committee decisions through July 16, 2006. The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in the traditional substantive areas of clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology (representing two or more of the preceding areas). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

11.
The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions below. The original date of accreditation, listed for each program, is the day on which the program's accredited status became effective. According to Section 9.c of the Accreditation Procedures, accreditation is effective as of the last day of the initial site visit, the report of which was among the documents used in reaching the accreditation decision. Any student enrolled in a program as of the date accreditation becomes effective is considered a graduate of an accredited program. Readers who desire information on training goals and approaches of specific programs are encouraged to write directly to the departments in which the programs are offered. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the APA Office of Accreditation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

12.
This article provides the official listing of accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology. It reflects all Committee on Accreditation decisions through June 29, 2003. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

13.
Lists the agencies whose doctoral programs in professional clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional–scientific psychology were accredited by the American Psychological Association's (APA's) Committee on Accreditation. For each program the date of accreditation and the date for the next regularly scheduled site visit are listed. Programs listed as accredited have been judged by the committee to be consistent substantively and procedurally with the "Guidelines and Principles for Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology" in a satisfactory manner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

14.
This article provides a list of the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that have been accredited by the Committee on Accreditation within the American Psychological Association (APA). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

15.
Lists the institutions whose doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology have been accredited by the American Psychological Association's Committee on Accreditation. The original date of accreditation as well as the date of the next regularly scheduled site visit are provided. Following the list of institutions is an acknowledgement by the Committee on Accreditation. In the acknowledgement, the Committee on Accreditation recognizes members of the Association who contributed to the work of the Committee by serving on site visiting teams during the 1995–1996 academic/training year. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

16.
Lists the institutions whose doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology have been accredited by the American Psychological Association's Committee on Accreditation. For each program, the date of accreditation and the date of the next regularly scheduled site visit are listed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

17.
Presents the official listing of accredited psychology doctoral programs, reflecting all committee decisions through July 17, 2004. The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in the traditional substantive areas of clinical, counseling, school, or combined professional–scientific psychology representing two or more of those areas. The original date of accreditation, listed for each program, is the day on which the program’s accredited status became effective. Program review is governed by the “Guidelines and Principles for Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology.” Also listed for each program is the date of the next regularly scheduled site visit or submission of self-study report. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

18.
The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions below. The original date of accreditation, listed for each program, is the day on which the program's accredited status became effective. According to Section 9.c of the Accreditation Procedures, accreditation is effective as of the last day of the initial site visit, the report of which was among the documents used in reaching the accreditation decision. Any student enrolled in a program as of the date accreditation becomes effective is considered a graduate of an accredited program. Readers who desire information on training goals and approaches of specific programs are encouraged to write directly to the departments in which the programs are offered. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the APA Accreditation Office. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

19.
Lists the institutions whose doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology have been accredited by the American Psychological Association's (APA's) Committee on Accreditation. The programs are given 1 of 3 accreditations: full, provisional, or probation. The original date of accreditation as well as the date of the next regularly scheduled site visit are provided. Those programs visited in 1994 or 1995, but for which the Committee had not completed its review at the time of print are listed as having the next site visit scheduled for 1994 or 1995. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

20.
This document provides the official listing of accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology. It reflects all committee decisions through July 17, 2005. The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in the traditional substantive areas of clinical, counseling, school, or combined professional-scientific psychology representing two or more of those areas listed alphabetically by their host institutions. All of the programs offer the PhD degree, except when otherwise noted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号