ECG anomalies and axis deviations in heart transplant recipients: MRI studies]

Side effects of morphine are common when given in titrated doses to control severe pain in advanced cancer. We report a case series of acutely ill cancer patients suffering from pain, complications of advanced disease, and opioid side effects. They were treated with intravenous (i.v.) ketorolac along with i.v. morphine using repeated dosing. Excellent pain relief with improvement in the opioid bowel syndrome was achieved. We found it possible to switch from IV ketorolac to oral ketorolac along with oral morphine for long-term pain control. Ketorolac can be well tolerated in high-dose, long-term use even in this frail patient population. An algorithm is presented for the suggested use of ketorolac as a morphine sparing agent. Potential methods for studying ketorolac further in this role are discussed.     

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.     

Gastrointestinal complications associated with intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine therapy in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: To report 3 cases of gastrointestinal (GI) complications associated with the use of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine therapy in elderly patients. CASE SUMMARIES: In case 1, an 88-year-old woman was taken to surgery for the management of an acute abdomen and repair of a 2+ cm perforated prepyloric gastric ulcer. The patient had received a total 16 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The patient died after surgery from complications associated with bacterial and candidal sepsis, as well as acute renal failure. In case 2, an 80-year-old woman with no known history of GI problems developed a prepyloric gastric ulcer, which perforated and penetrated into the pancreas after the patient received 13 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The patient died from complications associated with candidal sepsis, peritonitis, and cardiopulmonary collapse. In case 3, an 85-year-old man with a history of a gastric ulcer developed GI bleeding after receiving a total of 9 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The bleeding was stabilized and the patient was discharged 12 days later in stable condition. DISCUSSION: Ketorolac tromethamine is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with potent analgesic properties. We report 3 cases of GI complications associated with intramuscular ketorolac therapy in the elderly. A temporal relationship was established with the development of gastric ulceration in 2 patients and the recurrence of a gastric ulcer in the third patient. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that the manufacturer's guidelines be followed when ketorolac is used in elderly patients, and the drug should not be used in patients with a history of gastric ulcer disease. The use of misoprostol may be warranted as prophylactic therapy in high-risk patients who are receiving ketorolac.     

A comparative study of ketorolac (Toradol) and magnesium sulfate for arrest of preterm labor

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ketorolac (Toradol). METHODS: In this prospective trial, 88 women in confirmed preterm labor at < or =32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive magnesium sulfate given as an initial 6 g intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion therapy (2 to 6 g/hr) or intramuscularly administered ketorolac (60 mg loading dose) followed by 30 mg every 6 hours for a maximum of 24 hours. RESULTS: The study groups were similar with respect to age, parity, cervical status, and gestational age on admission. Ketorolac was more rapid (2.71 hr+/-2.16) in the arrest of preterm labor than was magnesium sulfate (6.22 hr+/-5.65). No patient required discontinuance of either drug due to adverse effects. There was no difference in the incidence of neonatal complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In gestations with preterm labor at <32 weeks, ketorolac appears to be an appropriate first-line tocolytic agent.     

The olfactory loss that accompanies an HIV infection

Acute low back pain is a common problem in the emergency department (ED). Effective management of acute pain enhances early rehabilitation and recovery. Given the importance of inflammatory mediators in pain generation and the adverse effects associated with opioids, it is logical to expect that a non-opioid agent with antiinflammatory and analgesic properties would provide excellent analgesia with fewer adverse effects. This double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, performed in six university and community hospital EDs, compares the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of ketorolac to those of acetaminophen-codeine in ED patients with acute musculoskeletal low back pain. Our hypothesis was that ketorolac would provide superior analgesia with fewer adverse effects. One hundred twenty-three patients with acute low back pain were randomized to receive ketorolac (KET, N = 63) or acetaminophen-codeine (ACOD, N = 60). Most (79%) were males, and the mean age was 34.5 years. After baseline clinical assessment, patients were treated with ketorolac (10 mg every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to four daily doses) or acetaminophen-codeine (600 mg-60 mg, respectively, every 4 to 6 h as needed, up to six daily doses) and followed for one week. Pain intensity was assessed on visual analogue and categorical scales. Functional capacity, overall pain relief, and overall medication rating were assessed on categorical scales. Adverse events were documented. Primary outcomes included: 1) Pain intensity differences, based on visual analogue scores, for the 0 to 6 h treatment phase. 2) Incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, and overall subjective drug evaluation at one week. Both drugs provided substantial pain relief, with maximal effect 2.2 h after oral dosing. There were no significant differences in analgesic efficacy, functional capacity, or overall pain relief between the two groups. Sixteen patients (10 KET vs. 6 ACOD, NS) withdrew prematurely because of drug inefficacy. Patients in the ACOD group reported significantly more adverse drug events and serious adverse drug events. Seven patients--all in the ACOD group--withdrew from the study because of adverse drug events. Based on comparable efficacy and a superior adverse event profile, ketorolac was preferable to acetaminophen with codeine for the treatment of acute low back pain in the ED.     

Does the preoperative administration of ketorolac improve postoperative analgesia

AIM OF THE STUDY: 1) To verify the usefulness of ketorolac administration (30 mg i.v.) before a surgical operation in terms of postoperative analgesia improvement; 2) To evaluate the impact of preoperative ketorolac administration on perioperative renal function and on intraoperative water balance; 3) to evaluate the presence of adverse effect due to preoperative NSAID use. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: University surgical department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, randomized in 2 groups: in group 1 ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) was administered immediately after the induction and, for postoperative analgesia, ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) was administered beginning at the time of skin closure; in group 2 no ketorolac was administered before the operation and postoperative treatment was the same. Buprenorphine (0.3 mg i.m.) was administered in case of unsatisfactory analgesia. Fluids infused and diuresis were measured intraoperatively. One, 6 and 24 hours after the end of operation pain was evaluated using pain intensity score and VAS. The day after the operation serum creatinine and urea were measured. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding fluids infused, intraoperative diuresis, postoperative pain, adverse effects and number of bleeding episodes. More than 50% of patients, in either groups, required opioids administration. CONCLUSIONS: Ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) administration before a major abdominal operation does not improve postoperative analgesia nor determines significant alterations in renal function or increase in the frequency of abnormal bleedings. Opiate administration is necessary in more than 50% of the patients to achieve adequate analgesia.     

Comparison of electromotive drug administration with ketorolac or with placebo in patients with pain from rheumatic disease: a double-masked study

This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of ketorolac compared with placebo when delivered by electromotive drug administration (EMDA) in patients with pain from rheumatic disease. In EMDA, or iontophoresis, a low-intensity electric current is applied over the skin to deliver medication into body tissues. Although EMDA has been used to treat patients with various diseases, controlled studies are lacking in patients with rheumatic disease. This double-masked study included 60 patients (43 women and 17 men) aged 31 to 80 years with the following conditions: 12, epicondylitis; 30, scapulohumeral periarthritis; 10, gonalgia; and 8, metatarsalgia. They were divided randomly by a physician into 2 groups of 30 patients each for 5 sessions of active treatment (30 mg of ketorolac) or placebo (5 mL of normal saline). Treatment took place every other day for 20 minutes. Immediately before and after the five treatment sessions and 7 days after treatment ended, both patient and physician measured the degree of pain using a categoric scale (no pain, slight pain, intermediate pain, strong pain, and very strong pain) and evaluated pain intensity using the Scott and Huskisson Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Seven days after treatment ended, both physician and patient judged the result of treatment using a second categoric scale (no improvement or intermediate, good, or very good result). Both ketorolac and placebo provided immediate, significant pain relief when delivered by EMDA, but only those patients receiving ketorolac experienced a further reduction in pain 7 days after treatment; those receiving placebo experienced a slight increase in pain. VAS values differed significantly between the two groups. Poor results (no improvement) were significantly higher in the placebo-treated group, while good results were significantly higher in the ketorolac-treated group. No patient reported any adverse effects during treatment. This study demonstrates that ketorolac relieves pain when delivered by EMDA and offers longer-lasting pain relief than does placebo.     

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ketorolac versus morphine by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare ketorolac tromethamine with morphine for pain management after major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Hospital recovery room and postoperative surgical unit. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with at least moderate pain after major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ketorolac by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus alone (Ket B), ketorolac by bolus plus infusion (Ket I), or morphine by PCA bolus (morphine), with injectable morphine available for supplementation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Levels of sedation, pain intensity, pain relief, and adverse events were recorded at baseline, at 2, 4, and 6 hours, and at termination. Supplemental morphine was required by 71% of Ket B patients, 67% of Ket I patients, and 38% of morphine patients (p < or = 0.001 for Ket B vs morphine). Although patients receiving ketorolac required more supplemental morphine than the morphine group (6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 4.0 mg morphine), there was a large morphine-sparing effect in both ketorolac groups (total morphine 6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 33.3 mg morphine). Overall pain relief scores were similar for morphine and Ket I groups, and were lower for Ket B than for morphine (p = 0.002). There were no differences among groups in numbers of patients with adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac may be effective when administered by PCA device, and has a clear morphine-sparing effect.     

Postoperative analgesia in herniated disk surgery. Comparative study of diclofenac , lysine acetylsalicylate, and ketorolac

INTRODUCTION: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in treating musculoskeletal pain and are theoretically ideal for treating postoperative pain of the lumbar column. OBJECTIVES: To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of treatment with 3 NSAIDs (lysine acetylsalicylate, ketorolac and diclofenac) in the treatment of pain after surgery for lumbar disc hernia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 75 ASA I-II patients undergoing discectomy because of lumbar disc hernia; balanced general anesthesia was used in all cases. The patients were randomly distributed in 3 groups based on type of analgesia given in the immediate postoperative period. Group A received lysine acetylsalicylate (1800 mg), group B received ketorolac (30 mg) and group C received diclofenac (75 mg). The analgesics were diluted in 100 mg of saline solution and administered through a peripheral vein over 10 min. We evaluated the analgesia attained on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the physiological response to pain was assessed by monitoring changes in arterial pressure, heart rate and breathing frequency. If analgesia was insufficient 30 min after administration of the drug, 200 mg of lysine cloximate was given as a top-up. The side effects of each drug were also recorded. RESULTS: VAS evaluation showed significant reductions in pain 60 min after administration in groups A and B and after 120 min in group C. Nine patients in each group required lysine cloximate. There were no significant differences in physiological response among the 3 groups. No patient suffered major side effects. Mild side effects were reported most often in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The NSAIDs studied were inadequately for treating pain after surgery for lumbar disc hernia. Ketorolac was no better than the other analgesics studied but was associated with a higher number of mild side effects.     

The maternal-to-zygotic transition in embryonic patterning of Caenorhabditis elegans

PURPOSE: To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% with those of its vehicle in the treatment of postsurgical ocular pain following radial keratotomy. METHODS: This study employed a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group design. Radial keratotomy patients were treated with either nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% or its vehicle four times daily for up to 3 days following surgery. Patients were provided with an escape medication (acetaminophen) for use only as needed for intolerable pain. RESULTS: Patients treated with ketorolac reported significantly greater pain relief (P < or =.023), less pain intensity (P < or =.047), less use of escape medication (P < or =.001), fewer symptoms of ocular discomfort (P=.024), and fewer sleep disturbances (P < or =.013) than did patients treated with vehicle. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in the ketorolac group, and only one treatment-related adverse event was reported in the vehicle group. Most other safety findings were equivalent in the two treatment groups except that there were significantly less eyelid erythema (P=.026) and eyelid edema (P < or =.001) in the ketorolac group. CONCLUSIONS: Nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution was significantly more effective than, and as safe as, vehicle in the treatment of postoperative pain associated with radial keratotomy. Therefore, topical ketorolac may be a valuable treatment option for the maintenance of patient comfort following refractive surgery.     

Ketorolac vs meperidine for the management of pain in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pain relief, sedation, and common side effect profiles of ketorolac tromethamine and meperidine for the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted over a 12-month period using consecutive adult patients presenting to a university teaching hospital ED (annual census: 32,000), who required IM analgesia for acute pain. Adult patients with acute pain of various etiologies were randomly assigned to receive a single fixed IM dose of ketorolac (60 mg) or meperidine (100 mg). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were enrolled in the study; 46 were randomized to meperidine and 47 to ketorolac. Using a visual analog scale, there was no difference in pain relief between the ketorolac and meperidine groups even after adjusting for baseline pain level. Ketorolac caused significantly (p < 0.005) less sedation than did meperidine at one hour. Rescue analgesia was required for seven of the 46 (15.2%) patients receiving meperidine and five of the 47 (10.6%) patients receiving ketorolac (p = NS). Seventeen of 45 (38%) patients receiving meperidine experienced side effects compared with eight of the 47 (17%) patients receiving ketorolac (p = 0.0452). CONCLUSIONS: When used to treat patients who had acute pain states, 60 mg of IM ketorolac produced analgesia similar to that produced by 100 mg of IM meperidine; however, the ketorolac produced fewer subjective side effects and less sedation than did the meperidine.     

The problem of acute pain in postoperative period]

The problem of postoperative pain remains actual despite the existence of a variety of pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical methods of anesthesia. Acute postoperative pain is an essential component of the surgical stress syndrome. Opioid analgetics (Buprenorfin, Nubain, Tramal, Promedol, Morphine) take the leading position among other types of analgetics. Present-day individual approach to administration of analgetics is still imperfect. The use of a standard dose of analgetics appears to be inadequate in a number of patients. The increase of opioids dose may lead to adverse reactions. In view of this it is valid to use nonsteroid antinflammatory medicines (Ketorolac). The choice of a proper dose of an analgetic is critically important in achieving adequate anesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or "analgesia on demand" is an alternative to administration of analgetics. The major advantage of PCA is the opportunity to achieve the rate of analgesia, according to individual demand of a patient. Besides, PCA allows to reach the desired effect much faster and to maintain the stable plasma level of an analgetic. 2-year experience of the PCA use in more than 200 patients of the National Research Centre for Surgery ICU has been analysed. The authors advocate use of PCA in clinical practice.     

Neurochemical effects of static magnetic field exposure

BACKGROUND: Ketorolac is a parenteral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). Two features have limited its clinical utility: tendency to elicit kidney failure and inability to produce complete analgesia. Because most NSAIDs are weak acids (pKa 3-5) and become concentrated in acidic tissues, such as injured and inflamed tissues, we hypothesized that local administration may enhance its analgesic efficacy while lowering the potential for systemic complications. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled study of 60 group I-II (American Society of Anesthesiology criteria) mastectomy patients, 20 in each group. Near the end of surgery and every 6 h postoperatively, 20 ml of the study solution containing normal saline with or without 30 mg of ketorolac were administered simultaneously either via a Jackson-Pratt drain or intravenously in a double-blind fashion. The quality of pain control, the amount and character of the drain fluid, incidence of nausea and vomiting, length of stay in the postoperative care unit, and amount of morphine used for treatment of break-through pain were recorded. RESULTS: Intraoperative administration of ketorolac resulted in better quality of pain control in the immediate postoperative period regardless of route of administration. The incidence of nausea was significantly higher in the placebo group, and drain output in the ketorolac groups did not exceed the output in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Analgesic of the locally administered ketorolac is equally effective to the efficacy of ketorolac administered intravenously.     

Epidemiology of insect venom sensitivity in children and its correlation to clinical and atopic features

STUDY DESIGN: The influence of ketorolac on spinal fusion was studied in a retrospective review of 288 patients who underwent an instrumented spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of postoperative ketorolac administration on subsequent fusion rates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used compounds, which are known to inhibit osteogenic activity and have been shown to decrease spinal fusion in an animal model. No previous studies have examined the influence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on spinal fusion in clinical practice. METHODS: The medical records of 288 patients who underwent instrumented spinal fusion from L4 to the sacrum between 1991 and 1993 were reviewed retrospectively. The 121 patients who received no nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were compared with the 167 patients who received ketorolac after surgery. The groups were demographically equivalent. RESULTS: Ketorolac had a significant adverse effect on fusion, with five nonunions in the nondrug group and 29 nonunions in the ketorolac group (P > 0.001). Ketorolac administration also significantly decreased the fusion rate for subgroups including men, women, smokers, and nonsmokers. The odds ratio demonstrated that nonunion was approximately five times more likely after ketorolac administration. Cigarette smoking also decreased the fusion rate (P > 0.01); smokers were 2.8 times more likely to develop nonunion. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs significantly inhibit spinal fusion at doses typically used for postoperative pain control. The authors recommend that these drugs be avoided in the early postoperative period.     

Restricted expression of Fc gammaRIII (CD16) in synovium and dermis: implications for tissue targeting in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

The authors conducted a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), with a combination of morphine and ketorolac versus morphine alone and ketorolac alone in the management of postoperative pain after orthopaedic surgery. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Group 1 was given 1 mg/ml morphine, group 2 was given 3 mg/ml ketorolac and group 3 half-doses of each. After a loading dose of 0.07 ml/kg, PCA was started at an initial setting of 1 ml per demand, with a 10-min lock-out interval and no background infusion. Pain was measured at rest and during movements for 48 h. The combination of morphine and ketorolac was more effective than morphine or ketorolac alone in relieving rest pain throughout the study. The combination was also more effective during movement than either drug alone, but only for the first 24 h. The consumption of morphine and ketorolac was significantly lower when the two drugs were administered together. The incidence of urinary retention was highest in the group given morphine alone. The combination of half-doses of morphine and ketorolac is more effective in controlling postoperative pain than either drug alone. This combination also reduces analgesic consumption and morphine-related adverse events.     

In vitro transcorneal permeation of ketorolac from oil based ocular drops and ophthalmic ointment

Transcorneal permeation of ketorolac from oil based ocular drops and ophthalmic ointments was studied in vitro, using goat cornea. Cumulative (%) permeation of ketorolac through cornea, was found to be maximum with 0.2% (w/v) ketorolac drops in sesame oil followed by formulations in corn oil and soyabean oil. Ketorolac 1% (w/v) drops in castor oil increased the quantity permeated but cumulative (%) permeation was less. Permeation profiles of ketorolac were in consistence with the partition characteristic of drug between oil and aqueous phase. Formulations favouring corneal permeation of ketorolac increased corneal hydration. Addition of benzyl alcohol, a preservative, to oil drops reduced permeation of ketorolac and corneal hydration indicating possible protective effect of benzyl alcohol against corneal damage. Permeation studies on ointment formulations containing either ketorolac acid or ketorolac tromethamine salt indicated better permeation for formulation containing ketorolac tromethamine aqueous solution. Thus for better transcorneal permeation, ketorolac 0.2% (w/v) drops, formulated in sesame oil, containing 0.5% v/v benzyl alcohol and ophthalmic ointment containing 0.5% (w/w) ketorolac tromethamine in dissolved state appear suitable.     

Comparison of ketorolac and opioid analgesics in postoperative ACL reconstruction outpatient pain control

Pain control is an important postoperative consideration with any surgical procedure. Technological and procedural improvements have contributed to the reduction in both the degree of surgical difficulty and the postsurgical complications associated with intricate surgeries. As a result, certain surgeries have potential for being performed on an outpatient basis, dependent upon appropriate pain-management regimens and the degree of potential for postoperative complications. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common procedure. Because of the reduction in invasiveness that arthroscopy provides, outpatient surgery is now routinely employed for ACL patients. The arguments against ACL outpatient surgery have included the reluctance to use ambulatory, indwelling, intravenous pain-pump delivery systems for opioid pain medication. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a ketorolac tromethamine used for the management of the postoperative pain produced as a result of outpatient ACL reconstruction. When the ketorolac pain management regimen is compared in this setting with meperidine or morphine, pain control is as good as, or in some cases better than, either of the opioid drugs. Additionally, the adverse side effects associated with opioid drugs are significantly reduced at a substantially lower direct cost to the patient.     

Comparison of ketorolac tromethamine with other injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain-on-injection and muscle damage in the rat

The local tolerance of ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol, Syntex) was compared with that of four other injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, ketoprofen, and metamizol magnesium) in the rat paw-lick/muscle irritation assay as described previously. All drugs were tested at concentrations approved for clinical use. After subplantar (footpad) injection, ketorolac produced virtually no pain-on-injection as assessed by the number of paw-lick/lift responses during a 15 min observation period. The other NSAIDs produced slight to moderate paw-lick/lift responses. Redness and swelling at the injection site were less severe for ketorolac than for the other NSAIDs. After intramuscular (i.m.) injection, all of the NSAIDs produced some degree of muscle damage, as assessed histopathologically 24 h after injection. The lesions, consisting primarily of muscle degeneration, were less severe for ketorolac than for the other NSAIDs. Ketorolac and metamizol produced the smallest elevations in serum creatine kinase, as measured 2 h after i.m. dosing, not significantly different from isotonic saline. Overall, ketorolac was better tolerated in the assay than the other injectable NSAIDs, thereby suggesting the possibility of improved local tolerance on clinical use.