Rheological and mechanical properties in polyethylene blends

Melt rheology and mechanical properties in linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)/low density polyethylene (LDPE), LLDPE/high density polyethylene (HDPE), and HDPE/LDPE blends were investigated. All three blends were miscible in the melt, but the LLDPE/LDPE and HDPE/LDPE blends exibiled two crystallization and melting temperatures, indicating that those blends phase separated upon cooling from the melt. The melt strength of the blends increased with increasing molecular weight of the LDPE that was used. The mechanical properties of the LLDPE/LDPE blend were higher than claculated from a simple rule of mixtures, whiele those of the LLDPE/HDPE blend conformed to the rule of mixtures, but the properties of HDPE/LDPE were less than the rule of mixtures prediction.     

Space charge distribution and crystalline structure in low density polyethylene (LDPE) blended with high density polyethylene (HDPE)

The space charge distribution in polyethylene blends under direct current electrical field was measured by a pulsed electro‐acoustic method. It was found that blending LDPE with 0.5 wt% HDPE decreased the amount of accumulated space charges and improved their distribution. Small‐angle light scattering and differential scanning calorimetry showed that crystallization of LDPE/HDPE started at higher temperature than virgin LDPE, and the sizes of LDPE/HDPE spherulites were smaller than that of LDPE. HDPE plays a role on nucleation during the crystallization process. Crystalline form was investigated by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and the results indicate that the crystal form did not change after blending. The reduction of space charges in the blended sample can be explained as the result of the dissipation of charges through boundary regions of smaller spherulites. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Understanding of the tensile deformation in HDPE/LDPE blends based on their crystal structure and phase morphology

The mechanisms of tensile deformation in high density polyethylene/low density polyethylene (HDPE/LDPE) blends were studied by a video-controlled tensile set-up, combined with dynamic mechanical analysis and small angle X-ray scattering. When quenching from the melt to room temperature, HDPE forms well-organized spherulits with high crystallinity and rigid amorphous layers between lamellae, and LDPE forms irregular aggregates with low crystallinity and mobile amorphous layers between lamellae. A separate lamellar stack-like structure is formed in HDPE/LDPE blends during the quenching. The deformation is affected by both the crystal structure and the phase morphology. Because the semi-crystalline polymers are made up of two interpenetrating networks, one is built up by the entangled fluid part and the other by the crystallites, at low deformations the coupling and coarse slips of the crystalline blocks dominate the mechanical properties, which allows the system to maintain a homogeneous strain distribution in the sample. The assumption of a homogeneous strain distribution can now be further proved by the tensile deformation in HDPE/LDPE blends, which shows two-step processes, with HDPE crystallites being broken down first at imposed strain of 0.4 and then LDPE crystallites being broken later, at an imposed strain of 0.6.     

Application of phase dispersion–crosslinking synergism on recycling commingled plastic wastes

A tetra‐component blend, consisting of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), was studied as a model system of commingled plastic wastes (LDPE/PVC/PP/PS, mass ratio: 70/10/10/10). Effects of chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and their mixture (CPE/EPDM/SBS, mass ratio: 2/2/2) on the mechanical properties and morphology of the system were investigated. With addition of several elastomers and their mixture, the tensile strength of the blends decreased slightly, although both the elongation at break and the impact strength increased. Among these elastomers, EPDM exhibited the most significant impact modification effect for the tetra‐component blends. SBS and the mixture have a good phase‐dispersion effect for the tetra‐component blend. By adding a crosslinking agent [dicumyl peroxide (DCP)], the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends also increased. When either SBS or the mixture was added to the blend together with DCP, the probability that the crosslinking agent (DCP) would be at the interface improved because of the phase‐dispersion effect of SBS. Therefore, more co‐crosslinked products will form between LDPE and other components. Accordingly, remarkable improvement of the interfacial adhesion and hence the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends occurred. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2947–2952, 2001     

Co‐crystallization in ternary polyethylene blends: tie crystal formation and mechanical properties improvement

Understanding the co‐crystallization behavior of ternary polyethylene (PE) blends is a challenging task. Herein, in addition to co‐crystallization behavior, the rheological and mechanical properties of melt compounded high density polyethylene (HDPE)/low density polyethylene (LDPE)/Zeigler ? Natta linear low density polyethylene (ZN‐LLDPE) blends have been studied in detail. The HDPE content of the blends was kept constant at 40 wt% and the LDPE/ZN‐LLDPE ratio was varied from 0.5 to 2. Rheological measurements confirmed the melt miscibility of the entire blends. Study of the crystalline structure of the blends using DSC, wide angle X‐ray scattering, small angle X‐ray scattering and field emission SEM techniques revealed the formation of two distinct co‐crystals in the blends. Fine LDPE/ZN‐LLDPE co‐crystals, named tie crystals, dispersed within the amorphous gallery between the coarse HDPE/ZN‐LLDPE co‐crystals were characterized for the first time in this study. It is shown that the tie crystals strengthen the amorphous gallery and play a major role in the mechanical performance of the blend.© 2016 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology,crystallization, and thermal behavior of isotactic polypropylene/propylene‐g‐styrene blends

Optical microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and small angle X‐ray scattering techniques were used to study the influence of the crystallization conditions on morphology and thermal behavior of samples of binary blends constituted of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and a novel graft copolymer of unsaturated propylene with styrene (uPP‐g‐PS) isothermally crystallized from melt, at relatively low undercooling, in a range of crystallization temperatures of the iPP phase. It was shown that, irrespective of composition, no fall in the crystallinity index of the iPP phase was observed. Notwithstanding, spherulitic texture and thermal behavior of the iPP phase in the iPP/uPP‐g‐PS materials were strongly modified by the presence of copolymer. Surprisingly, iPP spherulites crystallized from the blends showed size and regularity higher than that exhibited by plain iPP spherulites. Moreover, the amount of amorphous material located in the interspherulitic amorphous regions decreased with increasing crystallization temperature, and for a given crystallization temperature, with increasing uPP‐g‐PS content. Also, relevant thermodynamic parameters, related to the crystallization process of the iPP phase from iPP/uPP‐g‐PS melts, were found, composition dependent. The equilibrium melting temperature and the surface free energy of folding of the iPP lamellar crystals grown in the presence of uPP‐g‐PS content up to 5% (wt/wt) were, in fact, respectively slightly lower and higher than that found for the lamellar crystals of plain iPP. By further increase of the copolymer content, both the equilibrium melting temperature and surface free energy of folding values were, on the contrary, depressed dramatically. The obtained results were accounted for by assuming that the iPP crystallization process from iPP/uPP‐g‐PS melts could occur through molecular fractionation inducing a combination of morphological and thermodynamic effects. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2286–2298, 2001     

Rheological and Mechanical Properties of LDPE/HDPE Blends

Melt rheology and mechanical properties of binary blend of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) have been investigated. Four different wt fractions of blends containing LDPE/HDPE (20/80, 40/60, 60/40, and 80/20) were prepared. Cole-Cole plots [storage melt viscosity (η′) vs. loss melt viscosity (η″)] and relation between storage melt viscosity (η′) with frequency (ω) and blend composition were constructed. Miscibility of blends was established from rheological data. Impact strength of the blends increased with increasing LDPE concentration, whereas tensile strength shows the opposite trends. Percentages of the crystallinity of the blends were calculated by both the differential scanning calorimetry and wide-angle X-ray scattering methods, which show that the percentage of crystallinity decreased with increasing LDPE concentration, but the rate of crystallization of HDPE phase was unaffected.     

Shear-induced epitaxial crystallization in injection-molded bars of high-density polyethylene/isotactic polypropylene blends

As a continuation of our previous works on exploring shear-induced epitaxial crystallization of polyolefin blends during practical molding processing [Na et al. Polymer 2005; 46, 819 and 5258], the present study focused on the importance of molecular weight on the formation of epitaxial structure in injection-molded bars of high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blends. By choosing two kinds of HDPE and two kinds of iPP with high molecular weight or low molecular weight, four blends with different molecular weight combinations can be designed. After making the blends via melt mixing, the injection-molded bars were prepared in a so-called dynamic packing injection molding equipment where repeated shearing was imposed on the melts during the solidification stage. Crystal structure and orientation were estimated mainly through 2D-WAXD. Our results indicated that an appropriate matching of low molecular weight HDPE and high molecular weight iPP was more favorable for epitaxial crystallization than other component matches. The effects of orientation and epitaxy on the re-crystallization behaviors of polyolefin blends have been elucidated in detail through PLM experiments. Moreover, epitaxy has been proved to play a positive effect in determining the ultimate mechanical properties of injection-molded bars.     

Blend of high‐density polyethylene and a linear low‐density polyethylene with compositional‐invariant mechanical properties

This article presents the tensile properties and morphological characteristics of binary blends of the high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) and a linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE). Two constituents were melt blended in a single‐screw extruder. Injection‐molded specimens were evaluated for their mechanical properties by employing a Universal tensile tester and the morphological characteristics evaluated by using a differential scanning calorimeter and X‐ray diffractometer. It is interesting to observe that the mechanical properties remained invariant in the 10–90% LLDPE content. More specifically, the yield and breaking stresses of these blends are around 80% of the corresponding values of HDPE. The yield elongation and elongation‐at‐break are around 65% to corresponding values of HDPE and the modulus is 50% away. Furthermore, the melting endotherms and the crystallization exotherms of these blends are singlet in nature. They cluster around the corresponding thermal traces of HDPE. This singlet characteristic in thermal traces entails cocrystallization between these two constituting components. The clustering of thermal traces of blends near HDPE meant HDPE‐type of crystallites were formed. Being nearly similar crystallites of blends to that of HDPE indicates nearness in mechanical properties are observed. The X‐ray diffraction data also corroborate these observations. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 2604–2608, 2002     

Effects of EPDM and wollastonite on structure of isotactic polypropylene blends and composites

Polypropylene blends and composites with 5, 10, and 15 vol % of EPDM and 2, 4, and 6 vol % of untreated and treated wollastonite filler were examined by applying different techniques. Elastomeric ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymer (EPDM) component and wollastonite influenced the crystallization process of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) matrix in different ways. The nucleation of hexagonal β‐iPP, the increase of overall degree of crystallinity, and crystallite size of iPP were more strongly affected by wollastonite than the addition of EPDM was. Both ingredients also differently influenced the orientation of α‐form crystals in iPP matrix. Wollastonite increased the number of a*‐axis‐oriented α‐iPP lamellae plan parallel to the sample surface, whereas the addition of EPDM reoriented the lamellae. The orientation parameters of ternary composites exhibited intermediate values between those for binary systems because of the effects of both components. EPDM elastomer considerably affected well‐developed spherulitization of iPP, increasing the spherulite size. Contrary to EPDM, because of nucleating ability or crystal habit, wollastonite caused significantly smaller iPP spherulites. Small spherulites in ternary iPP/EPDM/wollastonite composites indicated that the wollastonite filler (even in smallest amounts) exclusively determined the morphology of ternary composites. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 4072–4081, 2004     

Modification of Ethylene Propylene Diene Terpolymer Rubber by Some Thermoplastic Polymers

Abstract

Blends of ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) rubber with thermoplastic polyolefins such as low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), high molecular weight polypropylene (PP), and polypropylene random copolymer grade (PP‐R) were prepared by melt mixing. The physico‐mechanical properties, equilibrium swelling in benzene, and aging properties of the binary blends were investigated, analyzing the effect of the rubber/thermoplastics ratio and the type of the thermoplastic material on these properties. The data obtained indicate that EPDM/PP‐R blend in 20/80 w/w% shows the highest physico‐mechanical properties with improved retained tensile strength at 90°C for 7 days. This blend ratio also gives excellent retained equilibrium swelling in benzene at room temperature for 7 days, although EPDM/LDPE blend in 80/20 w/w% imparts the highest retained elongation at break at 90°C for 7 days.     

Ultrasonic improvement of the compatibility and rheological behavior of high‐density polyethylene/polystyrene blends

The effects of ultrasonic oscillations on the rheological behavior, mechanical properties, and morphology of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/polystyrene (PS) blends were studied. The experimental results show that the die pressure and apparent viscosity of HDPE/PS blends are remarkably reduced in the presence of ultrasonic oscillations and that mechanical properties of the blends are improved. The particle size of the dispersed phase in HDPE/PS blends becomes smaller, its distribution becomes narrower, and the interfacial interaction of the blends becomes stronger if the blends are extruded in the presence of ultrasonic oscillations. Ultraviolet spectra and Soxhlet extraction results show the formation of a polyethylene‐PS copolymer during extrusion in the presence of ultrasonic oscillations, which improves the compatibility of HDPE/PS blends. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 23–32, 2002     

Effects of crystallization on dispersion of carbon nanofibers and electrical properties of polymer nanocomposites

Polymer nanocomposites filled with low volume fractions of carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were prepared by melt‐compounding. Three types of polymers with different crystallization behavior, i.e., weakly‐crystallized low density polyethylene (LDPE), strongly crystallized high density polyethylene (HDPE) and amorphous polystyrene (PS), were selected as matrices for the nanocomposites. The effects of polymer crystallization on the dispersion of CNFs were examined. Optical and electron microscopic examinations revealed that the dispersion of CNFs in the nanocomposite matrices was strongly depended on the crystallization behavior of polymer matrices. The CNFs were found to disperse uniformly in weakly crystallized LDPE and amorphous PS matrices, but agglomerated in HDPE due to its strong crystallization tendency. Such a distinct dispersion behavior of CNFs in polymers had a profound effect on the electrical properties of the nanocomposites investigated. The PS/CNF nanocomposites exhibited the lowest percolation threshold. The HDPE/CNF nanocomposites showed the largest percolation threshold due to the CNF agglomeration within the amorphous phase of HDPE. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 48:177–183, 2008. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphology prediction and the effect of core‐shell structure on the rheological behavior of PP/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends

In this work, the morphologies of polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐propylene‐diene (EPDM) rubber/high density polyethylene (HDPE) 70/20/10 blends were studied and compared with the predictions of the spreading coefficient and minimum free energy models. The interfacial tension of PP/HDPE, PP/EPDM, and HDPE/EPDM blends were obtained by fitting the experimental dynamic storage modulus data to Palierne's theory. The prediction results showed core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) in PP matrix. The PP/EPDM/HDPE blends were respectively prepared by direct extrusion and lateral injection method. Core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) could be obtained with direct extrusion corresponding to the predicted morphology. The morphology of PP/EPDM/HDPE blends could be effectively controlled by lateral injection method. For PP/EPDM/HDPE blend prepared by lateral injection method, HDPE and EPDM phase were dispersed independently in PP matrix. It was found that the different morphology of PP/EPDM/HDPE blends prepared by two methods showed different rheological behavior. When the core‐shell morphology (core of HDPE and shell of EPDM) appeared, the EPDM shell could confine the deformation of HDPE core significantly, so the interfacial energy contribution of dispersed phase on the storage modulus of blends would be weaken in the low frequency region. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Spherulite nucleation in polypropylene blends with low density polyethylene

Primary nucleation of spherulites in blends of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) with low density polyethylene (LDPE) was investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. The number of iPP spherulites in the blend decreases with increasing LDPE concentration to a much greater extent than follows from the decreasing amount of iPP. The shapes of spherulite size distributions indicate that athermal (heterogeneous) primary nucleation is inhibited. The density of primary nucleation in the blends decreases strongly with increasing mixing time. The same effect was observed in the blends with the nucleating agent which was added to iPP or LDPE. These experiments demonstrate that heterogenoeus nuclei migrate across interphase boundaries from the iPP melt to the LDPE melt during the mixing process. It is suggested that the interfacial energy difference between the nuclei and the molten components of the blend is responsible for the migration of nuclei.     

Effect of EPDM on the mechanical properties of blends of high and low density polyethylene

Summary We studied the effect of adding ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM) to blends of high (HDPE) and low (LDPE) density polyethylene. The extrusion torque of the blend without EPDM shows a deviation from the linear addition rule, but blends with rubber follow the addition rule. Two composition regions that are compatible with the torque behavior are present in the Young's modulus and extension at break curves. The EPDM content improves the extension at break of LDPE rich blends. This improvement extends to higher compositions of HDPE as the EPDM content is increased. Received: 4 September 1997/Revised version: 30 April 1998/Accepted: 13 May 1998     

Modification of recycled high‐density polyethylene by low‐density and linear‐low‐density polyethylenes

The present study investigated mixed polyolefin compositions with the major component being a post‐consumer, milk bottle grade high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) for use in large‐scale injection moldings. Both rheological and mechanical properties of the developed blends are benchmarked against those shown by a currently used HDPE injection molding grade, in order to find a potential composition for its replacement. Possibility of such replacement via modification of recycled high‐density polyethylene (reHDPE) by low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and linear‐low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) is discussed. Overall, mechanical and rheological data showed that LDPE is a better modifier for reHDPE than LLDPE. Mechanical properties of reHDPE/LLDPE blends were lower than additive, thus demonstrating the lack of compatibility between the blend components in the solid state. Mechanical properties of reHDPE/LDPE blends were either equal to or higher than calculated from linear additivity. Capillary rheological measurements showed that values of apparent viscosity for LLDPE blends were very similar to those of the more viscous parent in the blend, whereas apparent viscosities of reHDPE/LDPE blends depended neither on concentration nor on type (viscosity) of LDPE. Further rheological and thermal studies on reHDPE/LDPE blends indicated that the blend constituents were partially miscible in the melt and cocrystallized in the solid state.     

Rheology behavior of high‐density polyethylene/diluent blends and fabrication of hollow‐fiber membranes via thermally induced phase separation

The phase‐separation behavior of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/diluent blends was monitored with a torque variation method (TVM). The torque variation of the molten blends was recorded with a rheometer. It was verified that TVM is an efficient way to detect the thermal phase behavior of a polymer–diluent system. Subsequently, polyethylene hollow‐fiber membranes were fabricated from HDPE/dodecanol/soybean oil blends via thermally induced phase separation. Hollow‐fiber membranes with a dense outer surface of spherulites were observed. Furthermore, the effects of the spinning temperature, air‐gap distance, cold drawing, and HDPE content on the morphology and gas permeability of the resultant membranes were examined. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Morphology and thermal properties in the binary blends of poly(propylene-co-ethylene) copolymer and isotactic polypropylene with polyethylene

The morphology and thermal properties of isothermal crystallized binary blends of poly(propylene-co-ethylene) copolymer (PP-co-PE) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) with low molecular weight polyethylene (PE) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), polarized optical microscopy (POM) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD). In PP-co-PE/PE binary blends, however, the connected PE acted as a phase separating agent to promote phase separation for PP-co-PE/PE binary blends during crystallization. Therefore, the thermal properties of PP-co-PE/PE presented double melting peaks of PE and a single melting temperature of PP during melting trace; on the other hand, at cooling trace, the connected PE promoted crystallization rate because of enhanced segmental mobility of PP-co-PE during crystallization. At isothermal crystallization temperature between the melting points of iPP and PE, the binary blend was a crystalline/amorphous system resulting in persistent remarkable molten PE separated domains in the broken iPP spherulite. And then, when temperature was quenched to room temperature, the melted PE separated domains were crystallized that presented a crystalline/crystalline system and formed the intra-spherulite segregation morphology: these PE separated domains/droplet crystals contained mixed diluent PE with connected PE components. On the other hand, in the iPP/PE binary blends, the thermal properties showed only single melting peaks for both PE and iPP. Moreover, the glass transition temperature of iPP shifted to lower temperature with increasing PE content, implying that the diluent PE molecules were miscible with iPP to form two interfibrillar segregation morphologies: iPP-rich and PE-rich spherulites. In this work, therefore, we considered that the connected PE in PP-co-PE functioned as an effective phase separating agent for PP and diluent PE may be due to the miscibility between connected PE and diluent PE larger than that between PP and dispersed PE.