Performance of automated activity monitoring systems used in combination with timed artificial insemination compared to timed artificial insemination only in early lactation in dairy cows

Identifying cows in estrus remains a challenge on dairy cattle farms, and tools and technologies have been developed and used to complement or replace visual detection of estrus. Automated activity monitoring (AAM) systems and timed artificial insemination (TAI) are technologies available to dairy farmers, but many factors can influence their relative performance. The objective of the present study was to compare reproductive performance of cows managed with an AAM system combined with TAI, or with a TAI program (Double Ovsynch) for insemination before 88 DIM. From April 2014 to April 2015, 998 cows from 2 herds were randomly assigned either to be inseminated at 85 ± 3 DIM exclusively using the Double Ovsynch protocol for TAI, or to be inseminated based on estrus detection by AAM without hormonal intervention between 50 and 75 DIM; if no alarm was detected by 75 DIM, cows were inseminated following the single Ovsynch protocol (AAM + Ovsynch). The herds used different AAM systems. Parity, hyperketonemia at wk 1 and 2 postpartum (PP), purulent vaginal discharge at wk 5 PP, body condition score at wk 7 PP, and anovulation to wk 9 PP were recorded. These health indicators did not significantly differ between treatments, but did between herds. The effect of treatment on pregnancy at first insemination and by 88 DIM were assessed using logistic regression models. Time to pregnancy was assessed using survival analysis. Results are reported from intention-to-treat analyses. Treatment did not affect pregnancy at first insemination or pregnancy by 88 DIM, but we found significant interactions between treatment and herd for both outcomes. In herd 2, marginal mean pregnancy at first AI was greater with Double Ovsynch (38%) than AAM + Ovsynch (31%), but no difference was observed in herd 1 (Double Ovsynch = 31%; AAM + Ovsynch = 34%). By 88 DIM, a smaller proportion of cows in herd 1 were pregnant in Double Ovsynch (31%) than AAM + Ovsynch (49%), but there was no difference in herd 2 (Double Ovsynch = 38%; AAM + Ovsynch = 38%). We observed a treatment by herd interaction for median (95% confidence interval) time to pregnancy, which were, in herd 1, 110 (106 to 129) and 98 (88 to 113) d, and, in herd 2, 126 (113 to 139) and 116 (105 to 131) d for the Double Ovsynch and AAM + Ovsynch treatments, respectively. The relative performance of AAM-based reproductive management compared with TAI only is likely influenced by herd-specific variables, in particular related to insemination rate when estrus detection is employed.     

Use of intravaginal progesterone-releasing inserts in a synchronization protocol before timed AI and for synchronizing return to estrus in Holstein heifers

Holstein heifers (n = 189) were submitted to a 42-d artificial insemination (AI) period in which they underwent AI after once-daily evaluation of rubbed tail chalk. At the onset of the AI period (d 0), heifers were assigned randomly to receive synchronization of ovulation and timed AI (TAI; d 0: 100 mug of GnRH; d 6: 25 mg of PGF(2alpha); d 8: 100 mug of GnRH + TAI) either without (GPG; n = 95), or with inclusion of a CIDR insert (CIDR; n = 94) from d 0 to 6. No CIDR heifers received AI before d 8 compared with 24% of GPG heifers, and pregnancy rate per AI (PR/AI) at 30 d after TAI did not differ between treatments. To synchronize return to estrus for heifers failing to conceive after TAI, heifers (n = 166) receiving TAI to first service were randomly assigned to receive no further treatment (control; n = 85) or receive a new CIDR insert between 14 and 20 d after TAI (Resynch; n = 81). No Resynch heifers received AI during CIDR treatment compared with 35% of control heifers, and the proportion of heifers receiving AI within 72 h after the day of CIDR removal was 78 vs. 50% for Resynch vs. control heifers, respectively. No treatment x inseminator interaction was detected at first or second AI; however, overall PR/AI was modest for heifers throughout the experiment due to poor performance of 2 of the 3 herd inseminators (14, 6, and 58% PR/AI, respectively). Inclusion of CIDR inserts suppressed estrus during the TAI protocol with no reduction in PR/ AI. Resynchronization of estrus using CIDR inserts resulted in tighter synchrony of estrus among nonpregnant heifers compared with untreated controls.     

Targeted reproductive management for lactating Holstein cows: Reducing the reliance on exogenous reproductive hormones

Adoption of automated monitoring devices (AMD) affords the opportunity to tailor reproductive management according to the cow's needs. We hypothesized that a targeted reproductive management (TRM) would reduce the use of reproductive hormones while increasing the percentage of cows pregnant 305 d in milk (DIM). Holstein cows from 2 herds (n = 1,930) were fitted with an AMD at 251.0 ± 0.4 d of gestation. Early-postpartum estrus characteristics (EPEC; intense estrus = heat index ≥70; 0 = minimum, 100 = maximum) of multiparous cows were evaluated at 40 (herd 1) or 41 (herd 2) DIM and EPEC of primiparous cows were evaluated at 54 (herd 1) or 55 (herd 2) DIM. Control cows received the first artificial insemination at fixed time (TAI; primiparous, herd 1 = 82 and herd 2 = 83 DIM; multiparous, herd 1 = 68 and herd 2 = 69 DIM) following the Double-Ovsynch (DOV) protocol. Cows enrolled in the TRM treatment were managed as follows: (1) cows with at least one intense estrus were inseminated upon AMD detected estrus for 42 d and, if not inseminated, were enrolled in the DOV protocol; and (2) cows without an intense estrus were enrolled in the DOV protocol at the same time as cows in the control treatment. Control cows were re-inseminated based on visual or patch aided detection of estrus, whereas TRM cows were re-inseminated as described for control cows with the aid of the AMD. Cows received a GnRH injection 27 ± 3 d after insemination and, if diagnosed as nonpregnant, completed the 5-d Cosynch protocol and received TAI 35 ± 3 d after insemination. Among cows in the TRM treatment, 55.8 and 42.9% of primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively, received the first insemination in spontaneous estrus. The interaction between treatment and parity affected pregnancy 67 d after the first AI (primiparous: control = 37.6%, TRM = 27.4%; multiparous: control = 41.0%, TRM = 44.7%). The TRM treatment increased re-insemination in estrus (control = 48.3%, TRM = 70.5%). Pregnancy 67 d after re-inseminations tended to be affected by the interaction between treatment and EPEC (no intense estrus: control = 25.3%, TRM = 32.0%; intense estrus: control = 32.9%, TRM = 32.2%). The interaction between treatment and EPEC affected pregnancy by 305 DIM (no intense estrus: control = 80.8%, TRM = 88.2%; intense estrus: control = 87.1%, TRM = 86.1%). Treatment did not affect the number of reproductive hormone treatments among cows that had not had an intense estrus (control = 10.5 ± 0.3, TRM = 9.1 ± 0.2 treatments/cow), but cows in the TRM treatment that had an intense estrus received fewer reproductive hormone treatments than cows in the control treatment (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 9.6 ± 0.2 treatments/cow). Selecting multiparous cows for first AI in estrus based on EPEC reduced the use of reproductive hormones without impairing the likelihood of pregnancy to first AI. The use of AMD for re-insemination expedited the establishment of pregnancy among cows that did not display an intense estrus early postpartum.     

Reproductive performance and herd exit dynamics of lactating dairy cows managed for first service with the Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch protocol and different duration of the voluntary waiting period

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the reproductive performance and herd exit dynamics of dairy cows managed for first service with programs varying in method of submission for insemination and voluntary waiting period (VWP) duration. Holstein cows from a commercial farm in New York were randomly allocated to receive timed artificial insemination (TAI) after the Double-Ovsynch protocol (GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 3 d later GnRH, 7 d later GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later TAI) at 60 ± 3 d in milk (DIM) (DO60 = 458), TAI after Double-Ovsynch at 88 ± 3 DIM (DO88 = 462), or a combination of AI at detected estrus (starting at 50 ± 3 d in milk) and TAI with the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol (PGF_2α, 14 d later PGF_2α, 12 d later GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later TAI; PSOv = 450). Subsequent artificial insemination (AI) services were conducted at detected estrus or the Ovsynch protocol (32 ± 3 d after AI GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later TAI) for cows not reinseminated at detected estrus. In a subgroup of cows, cyclicity (based on progesterone concentration), uterine health (vaginal discharge and uterine cytology), and BCS were evaluated at baseline (DO60 and DO88 = 33 ± 3 DIM; PSOv = 34 ± 3 DIM), beginning of the synchronization protocol (DO60 = 33 ± 3 DIM; DO88 = 61 ± 3 DIM; PSOv = 34 ± 3 DIM), and within ?5 (PSOv) or ?10 d (DO) of the VWP end (DO60 = 50 ± 3 DIM; DO88 = 78 ± 3 DIM; PSOv = 45 ± 3 DIM). Effects of treatments were assessed with multivariable statistical methods relevant for each outcome variable. Cows in the DO88 treatment had delayed time to pregnancy during lactation (DO60 vs. DO88 hazard ratio = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.32 to 1.78; PSOv vs. DO88 hazard ratio = 1.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.19 to 1.61) and, within multiparous cows, the DO88 and PSOv treatments had greater risk of leaving the herd than cows in the DO60 treatment (DO88 vs. DO60 hazard ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 2.00; PSOv vs. DO60 hazard ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.03 to 1.85). Cows in the DO88 treatment had improved uterine health, greater BCS, and reduced incidence of anovulation than cows in DO60 and PSOv; however, overall pregnancy per AI 39 ± 3 d after AI was similar for the 3 treatment groups. In summary, reproductive management strategies that led to similar average DIM to the first service (～60 d) through a combination of AI at estrus with TAI (PSOv) or all TAI (DO60) resulted in reduced time to pregnancy after calving when compared with an all TAI program (DO88) with a VWP of 88 d. Within the multiparous cow group, those that received all TAI with a VWP duration of 60 d were less likely to leave the herd than cows in the other treatments.     

Economic comparison of timed artificial insemination and exogenous progesterone as treatments for ovarian cysts

The objective of this study was to compare the economic benefits of timed artificial insemination (AI) and a progesterone insert as therapeutic treatments for cows diagnosed with cystic ovarian disease (COD). A secondary objective was to illustrate the use of a stochastic dynamic simulation model to fully account for all changes in revenues and costs affected by differences in treatments. First, 4 herds of 1,000 cows each were simulated until steady state. These cows were free from COD and inseminated based on estrus only. Herds differed by probability of estrus detection (46 or 70%) and days in milk (DIM) when nonpregnant cows were culled (330 or 400 d). Second, 3 herds were created with 1,000 nonpregnant cows at 90, 170, or 250 DIM. These cows were considered diagnosed with COD at the start of the simulation (d 0); no new cases of COD developed after d 0. Cows spontaneously recovered or were treated. Treatments were either timed AI or intravaginal device containing progesterone followed by PGF_2α and then AI if estrus was detected. Effects of treatments were evaluated in 48 scenarios based on compliance of timed AI (82 or 100%), probability of estrus detection (46 or 70%), and DIM when nonpregnant cows were culled (330 or 400 d). As cows became pregnant or were replaced, the herd evolved into the associated steady-state herd. Seven scenarios resulted in less than 50% of cows conceiving before they were culled. The percentage of cows diagnosed with COD that calved again ranged from 14.0 to 74.4% and was significantly reduced when COD was diagnosed later in lactation. Treatments in all cases were more valuable than waiting for spontaneous recovery. The average values of timed AI (82 or 100% compliance) and the progesterone insert were $83.29, $86.83, and $71.89, respectively, compared with waiting for spontaneous recovery. Treatments were least beneficial at 90 DIM. The benefits of timed AI (82 or 100% compliance) compared with the progesterone insert, adjusted for DIM and days to culling, were $14.98 and $21.53 when the probability of estrus detection was 46%. At 70% probability of estrus detection, the benefits were $7.81 and $8.34, respectively. Overall benefit of treatment by timed AI was $11.39 greater than by progesterone insert.     

Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows after presynchronization of estrous cycles and variations of the Ovsynch protocol

Our objectives were to determine pregnancy rates after altering times of the second GnRH injection, insemination, or both in a combined Presynch + Ovsynch protocol, to accommodate once-daily lockup of dairy cows. Lactating dairy cows (n = 665) from 2 dairy herds in northeastern Kansas were studied. Cows ranged from 24 to 44 d in milk (DIM) at the start of the Pre-synch protocol, which consisted of 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) 14 d apart, with the second injection given 12 d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol. Cows were blocked by lactation number and assigned randomly to 3 treatments consisting of variations of the Ovsynch protocol. Cows in 2 treatments received injections of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h (G48) after the PGF(2alpha) injection. Timed AI (TAI) was conducted at the time of the second GnRH injection (G48 + TAI48) or 24 h later (G48 + TAI72). Cows in the third treatment received the injections of GnRH 7 d before and at 72 h after PGF(2alpha) and were inseminated at the time of the second GnRH injection (G72 + TAI72). Pregnancy was diagnosed weekly by palpation per rectum of uterine contents on d 40 or 41 after TAI. Pregnancy rates differed between herds, but they were consistently greater for G72 + TAI72 than for G48 + TAI48 and G72 + TAI72. Subsequent calving rates were consistent with differences in initial TAI pregnancy rates. Pregnancy loss was least for cows on the G72 + TAI72 treatment. Body condition scores (BCS) ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 when assessed on Monday of the breeding week. An interaction of BCS and herd was detected in which cows in herd 1 having poorer BCS (<2.25) had greater pregnancy rates than cows of greater BCS (>/=2.25), whereas the reverse was true in herd 2 in which overall pregnancy rates were greater. We concluded that inseminating at 48 or 72 h after PGF(2alpha), when GnRH was administered at 48 h after PGF(2alpha), produced fewer pregnancies than inseminating and injecting GnRH at 72 h after PGF(2alpha) for cows whose estrous cycles were synchronized before initiating this variant of the Ovsynch protocol.     

Fertility of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination versus artificial insemination after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range

Our objective was to compare the AI submission rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) at first service of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination (TAI) versus artificial insemination (AI) to a detected estrus after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range. Lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to receive their first TAI after a Double-Ovsynch protocol (DO; n = 294) or to receive their first AI after a synchronized estrus (EST; n = 284). Pregnancy status was determined 33 ± 3 d after insemination and was reconfirmed 63 ± 3 d after insemination. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and logistic regression using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). By design, days in milk at first insemination did not differ between treatments (76.9 ± 0.2 vs. 76.7 ± 0.3 for DO vs. EST cows, respectively), but more DO cows were inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period than EST cows (100.0 vs. 77.5%). Overall, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows at both 33 d (49.0 vs. 38.6%) and 63 d (44.6 vs. 36.4%) after insemination, but pregnancy loss from 33 to 63 d after insemination did not differ between treatments. Primiparous cows had more P/AI than multiparous cows 33 and 63 d after insemination, but the treatment by parity interaction was not significant. Synchronization rate to the hormonal protocols was 85.3%, which did not differ between treatments; however, synchronized DO cows had more P/AI 33 d after insemination than synchronized EST cows (54.7 vs. 44.5%). In summary, submission of lactating Holstein cows to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and TAI for first insemination increased the percentage of cows inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period and increased P/AI at 33 and 63 d after first insemination resulting in 64 and 58% more pregnant cows, respectively, than submission of cows for first AI after detection of estrus at a similar day in milk range. We conclude that, because the proportion of synchronized cows did not differ between treatments, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows because of an intrinsic increase in fertility after submission to a fertility program.     

Synchronization of breeding and its impact on genetic parameters and evaluation of female fertility traits

Achieving an acceptable level of fertility in herds is difficult for many dairy producers because identifying cows in estrus has become challenging owing to poor estrus expression, increased herd size, and lack of time and skilled labor for estrus detection. As a result, synchronization of estrus is often used to manage reproduction. The aims of this study were (1) to identify artificial inseminations (AI) that were performed following synchronization and (2) to assess the effect of synchronization on genetic parameters and evaluation of fertility traits. This study used breeding data collected between 1995 and 2021 from over 4,600 Australian dairy herds that had at least 30 matings per year. Because breeding methods were not reported, the recording pattern of breeding dates showing a large proportion of the total AI being recorded on a single date of the year served as an indicator of synchronization. First, the proportion of AI recorded on each day of the year was calculated for each herd-year. Subsequently, synchronization was defined when a herd with, for instance, only 30 matings in a year, had at least 0.20 or more AI on the same day. As the number of breedings in a herd-year increased, the threshold for classifying AI was continuously reduced from 0.20 to as low as 0.03 under the assumption that mating of many cows on a single date becomes increasingly difficult without synchronization. From the current data, we deduced that 0.11 of all AI were possibly performed following synchronization (i.e., timed AI, TAI). The proportion of AI classified as TAI increased over time and with herd size. Although the deviation from equal numbers of mating on 7 d of the week was not used for classifying AI, 0.44 of AI being categorized as TAI were performed on just 2 d of the week. When data classified as TAI were used for estimating genetic parameters and breeding values, the interval between calving and first service (CFS) was found to be the most affected trait. The phenotypic and additive genetic variance and heritability, as well as variability and reliability of estimated breeding values of bulls and cows for CFS were lower for TAI than for AI performed following detected estrus (i.e., estrus-detected AI, EAI). For calving interval, first service nonreturn rate (FNRR), and successful calving rate to first service, genetic correlations between the same trait measured in TAI and EAI were close to 1, in contrast to 0.55 for CFS. The lower genetic variances and heritabilities for FNRR and calving interval in TAI than in EAI suggests that synchronization reduces the genetic variability of fertility. In conclusion, TAI makes CFS an ineffective measure of fertility. One approach to minimize this effect on genetic evaluations is to identify TAI (using the method described for example) and then set the CFS of these cows as missing records when running multitrait genetic evaluations of fertility traits that include CFS. In the long term, the most practical and accurate way to reduce the effect of synchronization on genetic evaluations is to record TAI along with mating data.     

Timed artificial insemination with estradiol cypionate or insemination at estrus in high-producing dairy cows

A total of 799 Holstein cows from 3 herds were randomly assigned at 37 +/- 3 d in milk (DIM) to timed artificial insemination (AI) or insemination at detected estrus. Cows were presynchronized with injections of PGF(2alpha) at 37 and 51 DIM. At 65 DIM, cows received an injection of GnRH, followed 7 d later by PGF(2alpha). Cows in the estrus-detected group were inseminated after being observed in estrus during the 7 d after the last PGF(2alpha). Cows in the timed AI group received an injection of 1 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) 24 h after the last PGF(2alpha). If detected in estrus or=1 ng/mL; L = <1 ng/mL), resulting in 8 combinations (LLL, LHL, LLH, LHH, HHH, HHL, HLH, and HLL). Conception rates and pregnancy rates were higher for cows in the timed AI group than in the estrus-detected group at 30, 44, and 58 d (e.g., at 58 d, pregnancy rates were 42.2% for multiparous cows or 34.4% for primiparous cows in the group receiving ECP and timed AI compared with only 20.8 or 18.8% for respective parity subgroups for the treatment group inseminated only at detected estrus). Pregnancy losses were 11.5% from 30 to 58 d and did not differ between treatments. Cyclic cows within both treatments had higher estrous responses, conception rates, and pregnancy rates. Cows that responded to presynchronization and to luteolysis (HHL) had the highest conception and pregnancy rates, followed by cows classified as LHL. Use of 1 mg of ECP to induce ovulation as part of a synchrony regimen improved reproduction at first postpartum insemination in dairy cows.     

Treatment of noncyclic lactating dairy cows with progesterone and estradiol or with progesterone, GnRH, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and estradiol

The efficacy of two programs for treating noncyclic cows was compared. In trial 1, 478 cows in five herds were randomly divided into two groups. Cows in one group (C group) were treated with an intravaginal progesterone device for 8 d followed in 48 h by 1 mg of estradiol benzoate to cows that had not been detected in estrus since device removal. Those in the other group (CGP group) were treated with progesterone and estradiol as for the C group plus 10 micrograms of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) at device insertion and 25 mg of PGF2 alpha 7 d after device insertion. In trial 2 with 729 cows in nine herds, the treatments were similar to those in trial 1 except that the duration of progesterone treatment was 7 d. No significant difference was found between trials and results from both trials were combined. Compared with C group cows, CGP group cows had a greater estrous response rate (93.2 vs. 89.1%), a greater conception rate to first artificial insemination (AI, 47.1 vs. 29.4%), marginally lower conception rate to second AI (52.9 vs. 59.7%), lower nonpregnancy rate (8.3 vs. 11.1%), and shorter intervals from the start of breeding to conception by AI (9.8 vs. 15.3 d) or by AI or natural mating (21.6 vs. 26.3 d). The treatment protocol used for the CGP group achieved better reproductive performance than that used for the C group.     

An alternative AI breeding protocol for dairy cows exposed to elevated ambient temperatures before or after calving or both

Our objective was to determine if a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol (Ovsynch) might produce greater pregnancy rates than AI after a synchronized, detected estrus during summer. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 425) were grouped into breeding clusters and then assigned randomly to each of two protocols for AI between 50 and 70 days in milk. All cows were treated with GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF2alpha. Ovsynch cows then were treated with a second injection of GnRH 48 h after PGF2alpha and inseminated 16 to 19 h later. Controls received no further treatment after PGF2alpha and were inseminated after detected estrus. Pregnancy was diagnosed once by transrectal ultrasonography (27 to 30 d after AI) and again by palpation (40 to 50 d). Based on concentrations of progesterone in blood collected before each hormonal injection, only 85.4% of 425 cows were considered to be cycling. Although conception rates were not different between protocols at d 27 to 30, AI submission rates and pregnancy rates were greater after Ovsynch (timed AI) than after detected estrus. A temperature-humidity index > or = 72 was associated with fewer controls detected in estrus with lower conception than for controls detected in estrus when index values were < 72, whereas the reverse was true for cows after the Ovsynch protocol. We concluded that a timed AI protocol increased pregnancy rates at d 27 to 30 because its success was independent of either expression or detection of estrus. However, because of poorer embryonic survival in Ovsynch cows during heat stress only (39.5 vs. 69.2% survival for Ovsynch and control, respectively), pregnancy rates were not different by d 40 to 50 after timed AI.     

Reproductive performance of dairy cows resynchronized after pregnancy diagnosis at 31 (±3 days) after artificial insemination (AI) compared with resynchronization at 31 (±3 days) after AI with pregnancy diagnosis at 38 (±3 days) after AI

An important part of reproductive management programs on dairy farms is identification of nonpregnant cows and early re-insemination to achieve higher pregnancy rates. The objective of this study was to compare the effect on reproductive performance and pregnancy loss of 2 pregnancy diagnosis protocols: (1) pregnancy diagnosis performed 31 ± 3 d after artificial insemination (AI) by ultrasonography (ULTRA), and (2) resynchronization started 31 ± 3 d after AI but with pregnancy diagnosis performed 38 ± 3 d after AI by palpation per rectum (PALP). Cows were randomly allocated into 1 of the 2 management programs. For cows enrolled in ULTRA, the initial pregnancy diagnosis (P1) was performed by transrectal ultrasonography at 31 ± 3 d after AI, and nonpregnant cows were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol for resynchronization of ovulation to receive timed AI (TAI). For cows enrolled in PALP, the Ovsynch protocol for resynchronization of ovulation to receive TAI was initiated at 31 ± 3 d after AI regardless of pregnancy status, with the initial pregnancy diagnosis (P1) performed by palpation per rectum at 38 ± 3 d after AI. For both groups, reconfirmation of pregnancy was performed by palpation per rectum at 63 ± 3 d after AI (P2). Cows were inseminated after detection of estrus by use of activity monitors at any time during the study. Two levels of activity were used as a reference for cows AI after detection of estrus based on activity: an activity level of ≥2 when a cow was coded in DairyComp 305 (Valley Agricultural Software, Tulare, CA) as open (nonpregnant) and an activity level of ≥3 when the pregnancy status of the cow was unknown. Our findings showed that the odds of pregnancy loss cows in ULTRA was 2 times higher between P1 and P2 compared with that of cows in PALP. Furthermore, pregnancy diagnosis method (ULTRA vs. PALP) did not have a significant effect on the Cox proportional hazard of pregnancy at P2. The occurrence of assisted parturition, metritis, or retained placenta was associated with a reduced hazard of pregnancy at P2. An economic analysis was performed by simulating a 1,000-cow commercial dairy herd using a decision support tool to estimate the net present value (NPV; $/cow per yr) from using the 2 different pregnancy diagnosis methods. The analysis revealed minor differences in NPV between the programs, depending on the cost to perform ULTRA or PALP. In summary, we observed no difference in the reproductive performance and only a minor and fluctuating economic difference when using either PALP or ULTRA for pregnancy diagnosis of dairy cows.     

Symposium review: The implications of spontaneous versus synchronized ovulations on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows

Lactating dairy cows are classified as spontaneous ovulators, in which establishment of pregnancy depends on the accuracy of detection of behavioral estrus for correct timing of artificial insemination (AI). Development of the Ovsynch protocol, a hormonal protocol that synchronizes ovarian function, thereby allowing for timed AI (TAI) without the need to detect estrus, provided a management tool for increasing AI service rates but not pregnancies per AI (P/AI). A review of 7 randomized, controlled experiments that compared P/AI of cows inseminated after a detected estrus to that of cows receiving TAI after submission to Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch protocols supports that the newest programs for TAI yield more P/AI than cows inseminated after a detected estrus. The physiologic and endocrine mechanisms that explain how fertility programs increase P/AI are a culmination of over 20 yr of research aimed at increasing reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows. We illustrate the dramatic change in reproductive performance of US dairy cows over time by comparing the phenotypic trend in days open with the genetic trend in daughter pregnancy rate and the phenotypic trend in cow conception rate. Whereas days open increased from 1955 to 2000, days open from 2000 to 2010 dramatically decreased without a concurrent increase in the genetic trend for daughter pregnancy rate. By contrast, the dramatic decrease in days open over the past 20 yr is associated with a dramatic increase in the phenotypic trend in cow conception rate. Although many management factors affect P/AI, adoption and implementation of TAI programs that directly increase P/AI is an important component of the dramatic increase in reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows in the United States over the past 20 yr.     

Increasing the length of an estradiol with progesterone timed artificial insemination protocol with 2 controlled internal drug release devices improves pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different lengths of ovulation synchronization protocols using 2 controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices on ovarian dynamics and pregnancy outcomes in lactating dairy cows. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,979) were randomly assigned to receive timed artificial insemination (TAI; d 0) following 1 of 2 treatments: (1) 9-d protocol (n = 988; 9D) with 2 intravaginal devices containing 1.9 g of progesterone (CIDR) and 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate on day ?11; 25 mg (i.m.) of dinoprost tromethamine (PG) and withdrawal of 1 CIDR on d ?4; 1.0 mg (i.m.) of estradiol cypionate, second CIDR withdrawal, and PG on d ?2; and TAI on d 0 and (2) 10-d protocol (n = 991; 10D) with 2 CIDR and 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate on d ?12; 25 mg of PG and withdrawal of 1 CIDR on d ?4; 1.0 mg of estradiol, second CIDR withdrawal, and PG on d ?2; and TAI on d 0. There was no effect of protocol on estrus detection, whereas a greater percentage of cows from 10D had ovulated close to TAI [no corpus luteum (CL) at AI and a CL at d 7] versus cows assigned to 9D protocol. A protocol × heat stress (average cow temperature ≥39.1°C on day of AI and d 7) interaction was observed in a manner that pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater in non-heat-stressed 10D versus 9D cows, whereas P/AI did not differ when cows were under heat stress. Furthermore, 10D protocol did not increase P/AI when all cows that received AI were included in the analysis or in cows that ovulated near TAI. However, animals assigned to 9D without any event of heat stress had a reduced P/AI when compared with cows assigned to 10D without heat stress. A protocol × CL presence at the beginning of the protocol interaction was observed and cows with a CL at the beginning of the protocol had a greater P/AI in 10D versus 9D; meanwhile, in cows without a CL, no differences on P/AI were observed. The protocol × CL presence at the beginning of the protocol interaction on P/AI was also observed for cows that ovulated near TAI. A greater percentage of cows assigned to 9D had follicles of medium size (13–15.9 mm), and greater percentage of cows assigned to 10D had larger follicles (>16 mm). Increasing the length of an estradiol with progesterone–based ovulation synchronization protocol (10D vs. 9D) increased the proportion of cows with larger follicles (>16 mm) and increased P/AI in cows without heat stress and in cows with a CL at beginning of the protocol. Moreover, the 10D protocol increased the proportion of cows with ovulation near TAI, demonstrating the effectiveness of this protocol in improving the reproductive performance of lactating Holstein cows.     

Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows

The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF_2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were detected between farms, suggesting that the use of automated activity monitors is prone to individual farm management.     

Fertility of holstein dairy heifers after synchronization of ovulation and timed AI or AI after removed tail chalk

Nonlactating Holstein dairy heifers (n=352) 13 mo of age were managed using a 42-d artificial insemination (AI) breeding period in which they received AI after removed tail chalk evaluated once daily. At AI breeding period onset (d 0), heifers were randomly assigned to receive synchronization of ovulation (100 microg of GnRH, d 0; 25 mg of PGF2alpha, d 6; 100 microg of GnRH, d 8) and timed AI (TAI; d 8) and AI after removed tail chalk for the entire AI breeding period (GPG; n=175), or AI after removed tail chalk for the entire AI breeding period (TC; n=177). As expected, 17.7% (31/175) of GPG heifers received AI after removed tail chalk before scheduled TAI. Pregnancy rate per artificial insemination (PR/AI) at approximately 30 d after first AI tended to be greater for TC (46.5%) than for GPG (38.3%) heifers. No treatment x inseminator interaction was detected; however, overall PR/AI was low for heifers in both treatments due to variation among the 3 inseminators (24.8, 30.0, and 58.0%). Pregnancy loss from approximately 30 to approximately 75 d after first AI was 10% and did not differ between treatments. Based on survival analysis, days to first AI was greater for TC than for GPG heifers, whereas days to pregnancy across the 42-d AI breeding period did not differ between treatments. Overall, 81.2% of GPG heifers receiving TAI synchronized luteal regression and ovulated within 48 h after the second GnRH injection. We conclude that this synchronization protocol can yield acceptable fertility in dairy heifers if AI to estrus is conducted between treatment with GnRH and PGF2alpha and AI efficiency is optimized.     

Short communication: Conception rates following detection of estrus and timed AI in dairy cows synchronized using GnRH and PGF2alpha

The objective of this study was to compare conception rates of cows exhibiting spontaneous estrus and receiving artificial insemination (AI) before completion of a timed AI protocol with cows that did not display estrus spontaneously, but were inseminated after 1 of 3 GnRH-PGF_2α protocols. Cows (n = 432) in 2 herds were administered GnRH on d -7 and were tail-chalked daily. Cows detected in estrus before d 0 were inseminated immediately. Cows not detected in estrus by d 0 were administered PGF_2α and were tail-chalked daily until 48 h after PGF_2α. Cows detected in estrus from d −7 to 48 h after PGF_2α were inseminated and designated as treatment A (n = 46). Cows not detected in estrus and not inseminated by 48 h after PGF_2α were assigned randomly to receive either GnRH 48 h after PGF_2α and timed AI 16 h later (treatment B; n = 132), or GnRH and timed AI 64 h after PGF_2α (treatment C; n = 127), or timed AI 64 h after PGF_2α (treatment D; n = 127). Pregnancy was diagnosed 38 to 45 d after AI by palpation per rectum of uterine contents. Nearly 11% of all cattle exhibited spontaneous estrus and received immediate AI. Herd did not influence the percentage of cows detected in estrus and inseminated. Conception rates did not differ among treatments. Conception rates differed between herds, but no interaction of herd × treatment was detected. No differences were detected between herds for days in milk, milk production, AI service number, or parity.     

Supplementation of progesterone via controlled internal drug release inserts during ovulation synchronization protocols in lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to determine the effect of exogenous progesterone (P4) during a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in dairy cows not previously detected in estrus. Lactating cows (n = 3,248) from 7 commercial dairy herds were submitted to a presynchronization protocol (2 injections of PGF_2α 14 d apart; Presynch), and cows in estrus after the second PGF_2α received AI (EDAI; n = 1,583). Cows not inseminated by 12 to 14 d after the second PGF_2α injection were submitted to a TAI protocol (GnRH on d 0, PGF_2α on d 7, and GnRH + TAI 72 h after PGF_2α). At onset of the TAI protocol, cows were balanced by parity and days in milk and assigned randomly to receive no exogenous P4 (control, n = 803) or a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing 1.38 g of P4 from d 0 to 7 (CIDR, n = 862). Blood samples were collected at the second PGF_2α injection of the Presynch and on the day of the first GnRH injection of the TAI protocol for P4 determination. When P4 in both samples was <1 ng/mL, cows were classified as anovular, whereas cows having at least 1 sample ≥1 ng/mL were classified as cyclic. Concentration of P4 at 11 to 14 d after AI was determined in a subgroup of cows (n = 453) from 2 herds. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 40 ± 5 and 65 ± 5 d after AI. Proportion of cows inseminated on estrus after the second PGF_2α injection of the Presynch protocol differed among herds (range = 26.7 to 59.8%). Overall P/AI for EDAI cows at 40 ± 5 and 65 ± 5 d were 36.2 and 33.7%, respectively, and pregnancy loss was 8.8%. Proportion of cyclic cows at the onset of the TAI protocol differed among herds (range from 66.5 to 86.3%), but did not differ between treatments (control = 72.4%, CIDR = 74.1%). Treatment affected P/AI at 40 ± 5 (control = 33.3%, CIDR = 38.1%) and 65 ± 5 (control = 30.0%, CIDR = 35.1%) d after AI but did not affect pregnancy loss (8.6%). Cyclic cows had greater P/AI at 40 ± 5 (38.2 vs. 29.3%) and 65 ± 5 d (35.1 vs. 26.1%) after AI, but cyclic status had no effect on pregnancy loss. Treatment affected P4 concentration after AI, with more CIDR cows having P4 ≥1 ng/mL (94.4 vs. 86.9%) and P4 ≥3.2 ng/mL (81.8 vs. 68.0%) at 11 to 14 d after AI compared with control cows. Treatment of cows not previously detected in estrus with a CIDR insert during a TAI protocol increased proportion of cows with functional CL after AI and P/AI.     

Increasing length of an estradiol and progesterone timed artificial insemination protocol decreases pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows

Our hypothesis was that increasing the length of an estradiol and progesterone (P4) timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol would improve pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 759) yielding 31 ± 0.30 kg of milk/d with a detectable corpus luteum (CL) at d −11 were randomly assigned to receive TAI (d 0) following 1 of 2 treatments: (8d) d −10 = controlled internal drug release (CIDR) and 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate, d −3 = PGF_2α(25 mg of dinoprost tromethamine), d −2 = CIDR removal and 1.0 mg of estradiol cypionate, d 0 = TAI; or (9d) d −11 = CIDR and estradiol benzoate, d −4 = PGF_2α, d −2 CIDR removal and estradiol cypionate, d 0 TAI. Cows were considered to have their estrous cycle synchronized in response to the protocol by the absence of a CL at artificial insemination (d 0) and presence of a CL on d 7. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60. The ovulatory follicle diameter at TAI (d 0) did not differ between treatments (14.7 ± 0.39 vs. 15.0 ± 0.40 mm for 8 and 9 d, respectively). The 9d cows tended to have greater P4 concentrations on d 7 in synchronized cows (3.14 ± 0.18 ng/mL) than the 8d cows (3.05 ± 0.18 ng/mL). Although the P/AI at d 32 [45 (175/385) vs. 43.9% (166/374) for 8d and 9d, respectively] and 60 [38.1 (150/385) vs. 40.4% (154/374) for 8d and 9d, respectively] was not different, the 9d cows had lower pregnancy losses [7.6% (12/166)] than 8d cows [14.7% (25/175)]. The cows in the 9d program were more likely to be detected in estrus [72.0% (269/374)] compared with 8d cows [62% (240/385)]. Expression of estrus improved synchronization [97.4 (489/501) vs. 81% (202/248)], P4 concentrations at d 7 (3.22 ± 0.16 vs. 2.77 ± 0.17 ng/mL), P/AI at d 32 [51.2 (252/489) vs. 39.4% (81/202)], P/AI at d 60 [46.3 (230/489) vs. 31.1% (66/202)], and decreased pregnancy loss [9.3 (22/252) vs. 19.8% (15/81)] compared with cows that did not show estrus, respectively. Cows not detected in estrus with small (<11 mm) or large follicles (>17 mm) had greater pregnancy loss; however, in cows detected in estrus, no effect of follicle diameter on pregnancy loss was observed. In conclusion, increasing the length of the protocol for TAI increased the percentage of cows detected in estrus and decreased pregnancy loss.     

Extending the duration of the voluntary waiting period from 60 to 88 days in cows that received timed artificial insemination after the Double-Ovsynch protocol affected the reproductive performance,herd exit dynamics,and lactation performance of dairy cows

This experiment evaluated the reproductive performance, herd exit dynamics, and lactation performance of dairy cows managed with a voluntary waiting period (VWP) of 60 or 88 d. Secondary objectives were evaluating VWP effect on cyclicity status, uterine health, systemic inflammation, and body condition score (BCS) before first service. Lactating Holstein cows from 3 commercial farms in New York State cows were blocked by parity group and total milk yield in their previous lactation and then randomly assigned to VWP of 60 (VWP60; n = 1,352) or 88 (VWP88; n = 1,359) days in milk (DIM). All cows received the Double-Ovsynch protocol (GnRH-7 d-PGF_2α-3 d-GnRH-7 d-GnRH-7 d-PGF_2α-56 h-GnRH-16 to 20 h-timed artificial insemination; TAI) for synchronization of ovulation and TAI. For second and greater artificial insemination (AI), cows received AI after detection of estrus or the Ovsynch protocol (GnRH-7 d-PGF_2α-56 h-GnRH-16 to 20 h-TAI) initiated 32 ± 3 d after AI for cows not re-inseminated at detected estrus. Cyclicity status (progesterone concentration), uterine health (vaginal discharge and uterine cytology), BCS, and systemic inflammation (haptoglobin concentration) were evaluated at baseline (33 ± 3 DIM for both treatments), beginning of the Double-Ovsynch protocol, and 10 d before TAI. Effects of treatments were assessed with multivariable statistical methods relevant for each outcome variable. Extending duration of VWP from 60 to 88 DIM increased pregnancies per AI (P/AI) to first service (VWP60 = 41%; VWP88 = 47%). Nonetheless, the greatest benefit of extending VWP on first-service P/AI was for primiparous cows (VWP60 = 46%; VWP88 = 55%), as P/AI did not differ within the multiparous cow group (VWP60 = 36%; VWP88 = 40%). Physiological status more conducive to pregnancy—characterized by improved uterine health, greater BCS, reduced systemic inflammation, and to a lesser extent more time to resume ovarian cyclicity—explained the increment in P/AI to first service. Our data also indicated that despite having greater P/AI to first service, cows with the longer VWP had delayed time to pregnancy during lactation (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.98) and greater risk of leaving the herd, particularly for multiparous cows (hazard ratio = 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.23–1.47). This shift in pregnancy timing led to an overall extension of the lactation length (+13 d), which resulted in greater total milk yield per lactation (+491 kg) but not greater milk yield per day of lactation. In conclusion, data from this experiment highlight the importance of considering the complex interactions between reproductive performance, herd exit dynamics, and lactation performance as well as the effects of parity at the time of defining the duration of the VWP for lactating dairy cows.