Antithrombotic therapy after coronary stent placement

Subacute stent thrombosis and hemorrhagic complications due to intensive anticoagulant therapy limit the clinical benefit of coronary stenting. Antithrombotic therapy after coronary stent placement has not been standardized yet. From January 1994 to December 1995 a total of 338 Palmaz-Schatz stents were implanted in 285 patients. Procedural success rate was 98.8%. In the initial period, after stent placement, patients were treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and warfarin (135 patients, Group A), while subsequently, according to the results of other studies, patients were treated with ASA plus ticlopidine (146 patients, Group B). Two hours after sheath removal, Group A patients were treated with intravenous heparin until therapeutic INR (2.5-3.5) was reached; warfarin was stopped 3 months later. In Group B patients 2 hours after sheath removal a treatment with subcutaneous heparin 25,000 IU/die plus ticlopidine 500 mg/die was started. Subcutaneous heparin was maintained until hospital discharge, ticlopidine was stopped after 1 month and ASA was maintained indefinitely. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Most patients had unstable angina and in the majority of cases the stent was implanted due to intimal dissection after balloon dilation. Eleven patients had subacute thrombosis of the stent (3.9%): 9 patients were in Group A (6%) and 2 patients were in Group B (1.3%; p = 0.04). Seven patients (6 in Group A, 1 in Group B) were treated with emergency coronary angioplasty and 3 (2 in Group A, 1 in Group B) with coronary bypass; nevertheless 7 patients (6 in Group A, 1 in Group B) had an acute myocardial infarction. Eight patients (6 in Group A, 2 in Group B) had major bleeding due to a large groin hematoma requiring blood transfusion or vascular surgery. In conclusion, after coronary stenting antithrombotic therapy with ASA plus ticlopidine, as compared with anticoagulant therapy, reduces the incidence of both cardiac events and hemorrhagic complications.     

Reduction of in-hospital complications after elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty using a combined pretreatment with ticlopidine and aspirin

OBJECTIVES: In a retrospective study the effect of a combined pretreatment using ticlopidine and aspirin (ASA) in patients undergoing elective PTCA procedures was investigated with respect to in-hospital complications of PTCA and with respect to the efficacy in avoiding a subacute stent thrombosis in case of stent implantation. The systematically performed pretreatment with ticlopidine and ASA takes the delayed begin of full antiplatelet effect of ticlopidine into account. METHODS: 1108 consecutive patients (group 1) underwent elective PTCA without pretreatment with ticlopidine. In case of stent implantation oral anticoagulation was initiated in this group. In 758 consecutive patients (group 2) with elective PTCA, a combined regimen with ticlopidine and ASA was initiated at least 24 h prior to PTCA and was continued in case of stent implantation. The rate of procedural success, necessary reinterventions, cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death) and complications as well as the rate of subacute stent thrombosis in the subgroups with stent implantation were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of patients without in-hospital cardiac complications (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, death) and without re-PTCA interventions was 92.8% in group 1 and 96.3% in group 2 (p < 0.005). Especially the rate of necessary reinterventions was significantly reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (5.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001). Cardiac events were reduced in group 2 (myocardial infarction: 2.0% vs. 1.1%, coronary artery bypass graft: 0.8% vs. 0.5%, exitus: 0.5% vs. 0%), the incidence of bleeding complications was similar in both groups (2.5% vs. 2.4%). The combined pretreatment with ticlopidine and ASA with a stent implantation rate of 16.4% in group 2 was effective to avoid a subacute stent thrombosis (1.6%, independent of the indication to stent implantation). One patient of 758 in group 2 had allergic reactions to ticlopidine. CONCLUSIONS: The "prophylactic" pretreatment with ticlopidine and ASA in combination with a higher rate of stent implantation reduces necessary reinterventions and cardiac events after PTCA and is effective to avoid subacute stent thrombosis without increase of complications, especially bleeding complications. Thus, this pretreatment can be proposed even in patients scheduled for elective PTCA without planned stent implantation to reduce the interval between a necessary unforeseen stent implantation and the full treatment effects of ticlopidine.     

Growth and congenital heart disease

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of heparin in preventing the abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty in low risk patients for this phenomenon. METHODS: In the last 4 years, 525 patients successfully dilated were randomized to receive intravenous heparin (n = 264) or not (n = 261) after the angioplasty. The excluding criteria were contraindications for heparin and risk for abrupt closure (refractory unstable angina, primary coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction, evidence of intracoronary thrombus, intimal tear after the procedure and cases of chronic total occlusions). Both heparin and non heparin groups were similar in respect to female sex (15% x 17%; p = NS), age over 70 years old (7% x 9%; p = NS), previous myocardial infarction (26% x 24%; p = NS), multi-vessel procedures (4% x 7%; p = NS, stable angina (40% x 46%; p = NS), unstable angina (52% x 48%; p = NS) and angioplasty after thrombolytic therapy (8% x 6%; p = NS). RESULTS: The overall incidence of abrupt closure was 2/525 (0.4%), with one case (0.4%) in each group. The in-hospital mortality was 1/525 (0.2%), which occurred in a non-heparin patient, due to a anterior myocardial infarction. Major complications occurred similarly in heparin and non-heparin groups (0.4%). Bleeding complications were observed more frequently in the heparin group (7% x 2%; p = 0.002). All of them were in the catheterization site and none required blood transfusion. Severe systemic bleeding were not observed. CONCLUSION: In patients regarded as low risk for abrupt closure, the incidence of this complication was really low (0.4%) and heparin probably do not prevent it.     

Confession of ignorance of causation in coroners'' necropsies--a common problem?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Subacute occlusion and bleeding complications have been the major limitations of coronary stenting. Several authors have suggested the nonessential role of oral anticoagulation to prevent occlusions. METHODS: We treated 121 patients (125 stent procedures with initial angiographic success) with the following regimen: heparin 10-20,000 IU i.v. and ASA 325 mg i.v. during the procedure, followed by ASA 125-325 mg/day/6 months and ticlopidine 250-500 mg/day/3 months. 40 patients were also treated with enoxaparine (14,000 IU/day, median) for 10 days. RESULTS: 172 stents (119 Palmaz-Schatz, 35 Wiktor and 18 of other types) were implanted in 148 lesions (in 45 cases with non-occlusive dissection or suboptimal results and the rest electively). Most of the stents were deployed at high pressure (median 14 atm.). The procedure was ended when the stent expansion was considered as optimal by angiography and/or intravascular ultrasound. No patient developed signs of subacute occlusion at follow-up (30-441 days). 2 patients developed non-Q wave myocardial infarction (occlusion of side branches). The rates of bleeding and vascular complications were 0.8% and 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting with high pressure dilatation and without subsequent anticoagulation seems to be associated with low rates of subacute occlusion and bleeding or vascular complications.     

Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study

BACKGROUND: Dual therapy with ticlopidine and aspirin has been shown to be as effective as or more effective than conventional anticoagulation in patients with an optimal result after implantation of intracoronary metallic stents. However, the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy alone in an unselected population has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomized to conventional anticoagulation or to treatment with antiplatelet therapy alone. Indications for stenting were classified as elective (decided before the procedure) or unplanned (to salvage failed angioplasty or to optimize the results of balloon angioplasty). After stenting, patients received aspirin and either ticlopidine or conventional anticoagulation (heparin or oral anticoagulant). The primary end point was the occurrence of bleeding or peripheral vascular complications; secondary end points were cardiac events (death, infarction, or stent occlusion) and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: In 13 centers, 236 patients were randomized to anticoagulation and 249 to antiplatelet therapy. Stenting was elective in 58% of patients and unplanned in 42%. Stent implantation was successfully achieved in 99% of patients. A primary end point occurred in 33 patients (13.5%) in the antiplatelet group and 48 patients (21%) in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio=0.6 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.98], P=0.03). Major cardiac-related events in electively stented patients were less common (odds ratio=0.23 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.91], P=0.01) in the antiplatelet group (3 of 123, 2.4%) than the anticoagulation group (11 of 111, 9.9%). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the antiplatelet group (4.3+/-3.6 versus 6. 4+/-3.7 days, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting significantly reduced rates of bleeding and subacute stent occlusion compared with conventional anticoagulation.     

Reversible binding of ethacrynic acid to human serum albumin: difference circular dichroism study

Intimal proliferation at the interface between prosthetic material and tissue is an intrinsic phenomenon of stenting and the major cause of insufficiency of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). For its prevention, a randomized study was performed comparing standard heparin treatment with a combination of trapidil, a drug with anti-platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) activity, and ticlopidine, a platelet aggregation inhibitor. Ninety patients with cirrhosis who received a transjugular shunt were randomized, and 84 patients completed the trial. Group 1 (n = 42) received a bolus of heparin (12 to 24 U/kg) at shunt placement, followed by 1 week of intravenous and 4 weeks of subcutaneous heparin treatment. Group 2 (n = 42) received the same heparin bolus, followed by a 1-day intravenous heparin treatment and a 6-month treatment with trapidil (400 mg/d) and ticlopidine (250 mg/d). Shunt function was assessed by duplex-sonography and angiography. Stenoses were classified according to their location as type 1 (within the stent) and type 2 (in the draining hepatic vein). The estimated rate of overall stenoses (intention-to-treat analysis) at 1 year showed a significant reduction in patients receiving trapidil and ticlopidine (group 2) as compared with heparin (33 vs. 57%; P =.047). There was no difference in the estimated 1-year rate of type 1 stenoses between the two groups, but there was a significant reduction in type 2 stenoses (group 1: 58%, group 2: 19%; P =.016). The treatment effect continued after withdrawal of the drugs and was accompanied by a decreased incidence of rebleeding. The study demonstrates that the incidence of type 2 stenosis of the transjugular shunt can be reduced by combined inhibition of platelet aggregation and PDGF activity. The findings may be of relevance not only for the transjugular shunt, but also for other stent applications, e.g., vascular and biliary, as well as for bypass and shunt surgery.     

Predictors of major in-hospital ischemic complications and length of hospital stay after coronary stenting

Although recent data show that coronary stenting reduces procedural complications and late restenosis, major concern has been expressed about the greater hospital cost associated with the use of this device as compared to conventional coronary angioplasty. Since length of hospital stay after surgical procedures is a major determinant of resource use, the identification of variables associated with an excessively long hospital stay after intracoronary stent placement may have important practical consequences. The purpose of this study was to assess factors responsible for the occurrence of in-hospital complications and prolonged hospital stay after coronary stenting in 939 consecutive patients enrolled in the Registro Impianto Stent Endocoronarico (RISE Study Group). Consecutive patients undergoing coronary stent implantation at 16 medical centers in Italy were prospectively enrolled in the Registry. Clinical data, qualitative and quantitative angiographic findings were obtained from data collected in case report forms at each investigator site. Major ischemic complications were considered death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery and emergency repeat angioplasty. The study group consisted of 939 patients (781 men, 158 women with a mean age of 59 years) in whom 1392 stents were implanted in 1006 lesions and expanded at a maximal inflation pressure of 14.7 +/- 3 atmospheres. The great majority of patients (92%) received only antiplatelet drugs after coronary stenting. During hospitalization, there were 45 major ischemic complications in 39 patients (4.2%): 13 events were related to acute or subacute thrombosis (1.4%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following factors were predictive of in-hospital complications: increasing age (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.18-4.07), unplanned stenting (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.65-7.23) and maximal inflation pressure (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). Mean hospital stay after stent implantation was 4.1 +/- 4.4 days and was related, by multivariate regression analysis, to female sex (p = 0.0001), prior bypass surgery (p = 0.03), non-elective stenting (p = 0.0001), use of anticoagulation (p = 0.0001) and development of major ischemic complications (p = 0.0001). This Registry shows that in an unselected population of patients undergoing coronary stenting, major ischemic complications occur at a relatively low rate (4.2%) and thrombotic events can be kept at 1.4%, despite the omission of anticoagulation in the great majority of patients. Length of hospital stay was affected by the occurrence of major ischemic complications, unplanned stenting, use of anticoagulation, female sex and prior bypass surgery. Accumulating experience, further reduction in complications and complete omission of anticoagulation may decrease length of hospital stay, thus reducing the use of resources after coronary stenting.     

Stent thrombosis revisited

The choice of antithrombotic regimes after stent implantation has increased. Complication rates have improved and in-hospital stay is reduced with the less aggressive regimes. For de novo stenting in large vessels with a good result, ticlopidine plus aspirin or even aspirin alone appears attractive. The successful use of such a regimen may depend on complying with published intravascular ultrasound criteria. For patients who are at higher risk, the option appears to be ticlopidine and aspirin either alone or combined with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin. In patients selected for established or threatened vessel closure, the old regimen using full anticoagulation should still be considered. Operators should deploy stents earlier to avert the need for true bailout stenting. We still await the truly non-thrombogenic stent that can be used in small vessels under any circumstances.     

Initial experience with the use of abciximab in the salvage treatment of acute coronary thrombosis in the Hemodynamics Laboratory

The optimal treatment of acute thrombotic complications in the Catheterization Laboratory has not been defined yet, due to the limited efficacy shown by various pharmacological regimens, even when associated to coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the effects of abciximab (ReoPro), a new potent inhibitor of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, when administered as a "rescue" treatment for acute thrombotic coronary occlusion during diagnostic or interventional procedures. Sixteen patients (12 males, 4 females, mean age 59.3 +/- 9.2 years, range 43-77 years), with unstable angina and consecutively treated with abciximab due to clinical instability attributable to coronary thrombosis angiographically proven during PTCA (9 cases) or diagnostic angiography (7 cases), were identified. The individual angiographic films and medical records were then reviewed in order to evaluate the effects of treatment on coronary flow, thrombus size and occurrence of in-hospital adverse events: death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI), need for urgent myocardial revascularization and hemorrhage. The administration of abciximab, in association with PTCA (associated in turn with stent implantation in 8 cases), induced a significant increase of coronary TIMI flow grade (0.3 +/- 0.6 vs 2.4 +/- 0.9; p < 0.05) and a significant decrease of thrombus "score" (size) 2.4 +/- 0.9 vs 1.3 +/- 0.6; p < 0.01). No deaths nor need for urgent myocardial revascularization were observed; in 31% of cases (5 patients) evolution towards AMI occurred, while however 94% of cases (15 patients) had a coronary occlusion before treatment. No major hemorrhagic complications were observed, while in 12% of cases (2 patients) a groin hematoma associated with moderate hemoglobin drop, developed. In conclusion, the administration of abciximab, associated with the common "rescue" interventional procedures, in patients with acute thrombotic coronary occlusion in the Catheterization Laboratory, appears to be effective in restoring adequate coronary flow and reducing the thrombus size (limiting therefore the evolution towards AMI), and safe, not having been associated with significant hemorrhagic complications.     

Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the multicenter aspirin and ticlopidine trial after intracoronary stenting (MATTIS)

BACKGROUND: Although the association of ticlopidine and aspirin has been shown to be superior to anti-vitamin K agents and aspirin after coronary stent implantation in low-risk patients, the latter combination has remained an unproven reference regimen for high-risk patients until recently. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 350 high-risk patients within 6 hours after stent implantation to receive during 30 days either aspirin 250 mg and ticlopidine 500 mg/d (A+T group) or aspirin 250 mg/d and oral anticoagulation (A+OAC group) targeted at an international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3. The primary composite end point was defined as the occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or repeated revascularization at 30 days. Patients were eligible if (1) the stent(s) were implanted to treat abrupt closure after PTCA; (2) the angiographic result after implantation was suboptimal; (3) a long segment was stented (>45 mm and/or >/=3 stents); or (4) the largest balloon inflated in the stent had a nominal diameter of 相似文献   

Introduction to coronary artery stents and their pharmacotherapeutic management

OBJECTIVE: To provide an introduction to coronary artery stents and their pharmacologic management, including anticoagulant therapy and newer antiplatelet regimens. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE and current journal search of relevant articles that evaluated coronary stent success rates and anticoagulation or antiplatelet regimens. STUDY SELECTION: Data from the use of primarily the Palmaz-Schatz stent were included. Studies using vitamin K antagonists that are not commercially available in the US were excluded unless they compared an antiplatelet regimen with anticoagulation using the international normalized ratio (INR). DATA SYNTHESIS: Limitations with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), such as ischemic complications and restenosis, have led to the advent of intracoronary stenting. However, the placement of a stent within the coronary artery lumen is associated with a risk of thrombotic events. Despite current postprocedural anticoagulation and antiplatelet regimens, thrombosis occurs at rates ranging from 0.6% to 21%. When anticoagulation is deemed appropriate, it should be used for 1-2 months and the INR should be maintained between 2 and 3.5. Anticoagulation appears to have no effect on the development of restenosis, but has been shown to cause significant hemorrhagic events in 5-13.5% of patients. Newer data continue to define the subsets of patients who may be managed with antiplatelet agents alone. Combinations of aspirin and ticlopidine or aspirin alone may be used to manage patients who fulfill the following criteria: optimal stent placement, high-pressure inflation, and adequate coronary size. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery stenting is a novel approach for the management of coronary artery disease, but is associated with the complication of stent thrombosis. Anticoagulation reduces the risk of stent thrombosis, but is associated with bleeding risk. Selected patients may be successfully managed with antiplatelet agents only. More data are needed to better define the optimal antithrombotic regimen.     

Modifiable risk factors for vascular access site complications in the IMPACT II Trial of angioplasty with versus without eptifibatide. Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to identify potential predictors of vascular access site (VAS) complications in the large-scale Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis (IMPACT) II trial, which studied angioplasty with versus without a new glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor (eptifibatide). BACKGROUND: GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition during coronary interventions has been associated with excess VAS complications. If other predictors of VAS complications could be identified, they might be manipulated to reduce complications. METHODS: A total of 4,010 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization (PTCR) were randomized into one of three bolus/20- to 24-h infusion arms: placebo bolus/placebo infusion; 135-microg/kg body weight eptifibatide bolus/0.5-microg/kg per min eptifibatide infusion; or 135-microg/kg eptifibatide bolus/0.75-microg/kg per min eptifibatide infusion. Heparin during the procedure was weight adjusted and stopped 4 h before sheaths were removed. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify independent predictors of VAS complications. RESULTS: VAS complications were more common in patients treated with eptifibatide (9.9% vs. 5.9% placebo-treated patients, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified eptifibatide therapy (p < 0.0001), advanced age (p = 0.0001), longer time to sheath removal (p = 0.0002), stent placement (with intense post-stent anticoagulation) (p = 0.0004), female gender (p = 0.0006), PTCR within 24 h of thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.002), larger heparin doses during PTCR (p = 0.009), major coronary dissection (p = 0.03) and placement of a venous sheath (p = 0.04) as independent predictors of VAS complications. CONCLUSIONS: VAS complications may be reduced by early sheath removal, by avoiding placement of venous sheaths and by limiting heparin dosing to avoid excessive activated clotting times. Early sheath removal during inhibition of platelet aggregation by eptifibatide is feasible.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the MultiLink stent

The standard coronary stent implantation technique requires routine predilatation of the target lesion with a balloon catheter. In this study, we prospectively studied the feasibility and efficiency of elective coronary stent implantation without predilatation. In 94 patients who presented with various ischemic syndromes, direct implantation of 100 balloon expandable ACS MultiLink stents (7 over-the-wire, 93 rapid exchange) was attempted in 100 coronary lesions selected to have favorable characteristics. The stent crossed the lesion without predilatation in 97 cases (97%) and was successfully deployed in 93 (95.8%). In 4 patients, adjunctive high-pressure postdilatation was necessary to achieve optimal stent expansion. Reference vessel diameter was 3.12+/-0.77 mm and lesion length 8.8+/-2.7 mm. Minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.95+/-0.38 mm to 2.98+/-0.28 mm and diameter stenosis decreased from 71+/-11% to 8+/-11% after stenting. One occlusive dissection was treated by a second stent. There were no major in-hospital complications. At 1 month follow-up, 1 subacute thrombotic occlusion occurred. These results indicate that in a carefully selected coronary lesion subset, elective stent implantation without predilatation can be safely and effectively performed. The long-term results of this approach and possible advantages over the conventional implantation techniques remain unclear and need to be evaluated in further clinical studies.     

Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes in a large consecutive series of patients undergoing percutaneous multivessel stent intervention. BACKGROUND: High restenosis and recurrent angina rates have limited the clinical outcomes of multivessel coronary angioplasty before stents were available to improve angioplasty results. METHODS: We evaluated in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization rates at one year) in 398 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in two (94% of patients) or three native arteries, compared to 1,941 patients undergoing stenting procedure in a single coronary artery between January 1, 1994 and August 29, 1997. RESULTS: Overall procedural success was obtained in 96% of patients with two- or three-vessel stenting and in 970% of patients with single-vessel stent intervention (p = 0.36). Procedural complications were also similar (3.8% for multivessel versus 2.9% for single vessel, p = 0.14). During follow up, target lesion revascularization was 15% in multivessel and 16% in single-vessel interventions (p = 0.38), and repeat revascularization (calculated per treated patient) was also similar for both groups (20% vs. 21%, p = 0.73). There was no difference in death (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.26), and Q-wave MI (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) was lower following multivessel interventions. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous conventional angioplasty experiences, multivessel stenting has (1) similar in-hospital procedural success and major complication rates and (2) similar long-term (one year) clinical outcomes compared with single-vessel stenting. Thus, stents may be a viable therapeutic strategy in carefully selected patients with multivessel coronary disease.     

Why so many stents?

BETTER THAN ANGIOPLASTY: Prolonging inflation with a perfusion balloon decreases the risk of acute coronary occlusion after angioplasty. The longer the artery remains patent, the greater the chances of 0% residual stenosis. This is what the sent allows. Stent act on both mechanisms of stenosis: elastic recoil and fibrous remodeling of the arterial plaque. TARGETTED ACTION: Stents improve angioplasty prevention of acute stenosis. They have a real action on preventing degeneration of the saphenous graft and lead to a significant reduction in the rate of restenosis of the dilated site. There are however two specific complications: subacute occlusion and greater incidence of vascular events. Stents are particularly indicated for the treatment of restenosis and chronic occlusions. TWO IMPROVEMENTS: Risks related to the implantation of a foreign body in the vascular system have been reduced with the use of ticlopidine and high-pressure stent implantation. POSITIVE RESULTS: Stents have produced better angiographic results. They limit restenosis and the number of revascularizations required in treated patients. Several questions concerning indications remain open.     

Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study reports on the initial experience with the Gianturco-Roubin flexible coronary stent. The immediate and 6-month efficacy of the device and the incidence of the complications of death, myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery and recurrent ischemic events are presented. BACKGROUND: Abrupt or threatened vessel closure after coronary angioplasty is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and in-hospital death. When dissection or prolapse of dilated plaque into the lumen is unresponsive to additional or prolonged balloon catheter inflation, coronary stenting offers a nonsurgical mechanical means to rapidly restore stable vessel geometry and adequate coronary blood flow. METHODS: From September 1988 through June 1991, 518 patients underwent attempted coronary stenting with the 20-mm long Gianturco-Roubin coronary stent for acute or threatened vessel closure after angioplasty. In 494 patients, one or more stents were deployed. Thirty-two percent of patients received stents for acute closure and 69% for threatened closure. RESULTS: Successful deployment was achieved in 95.4% of patients. Overall, stenting resulted in an immediate angiographic improvement in the diameter stenosis from 63 +/- 25% before stenting to 15 +/- 14% after stenting. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery was required in 4.3% (21 of 493 patients). The incidence of in-hospital myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave) was 5.5% (27 of 493 patients). At 6 months, myocardial infarction was infrequent, occurring in 1.6% (8 of 493 patients). The incidence of in-hospital death was 2.2% (11 of 493 patients). Late death occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) and 34 patients (6.9%) required later bypass graft surgery. Complications included blood loss, primarily from the arterial access site, and subacute thrombosis of the stented vessel in 43 patients (8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The early multicenter experience suggests that this stent is a useful adjunct to coronary angioplasty to prevent or minimize complications associated with flow-limiting coronary artery dissections previously correctable only by surgery. Although this study was not randomized, it demonstrated a high technical success rate and encouraging results with respect to the low incidence of emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and myocardial infarction.     

Intestinal epithelial cell regulation of macrophage and lymphocyte interleukin 10 expression

Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty. Aim of the present study was to determine the in-hospital and long-term results of stent deployment in focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts. Thirty-five focal, de novo lesions of vein grafts in 31 patients were treated with stent deployment. Twenty-four patients (77%) had three vessels, 6 (20%) two vessels and 1 (3%) single vessel disease. Saphenous vein grafts aged 9.7 +/- 4.2 years (range 1-19 years). Twenty-two lesions (63%) were located within the body of the saphenous graft, 8 (23%) at the graft/coronary artery anastomosis and 5 (14%) at the aorta/graft anastomosis. The indications for stent deployment included: suboptimal result from balloon angioplasty (defined as > or = 50% post-angioplasty residual stenosis) in 29/35 lesions (83%); post-angioplasty coronary dissection with threatening occlusion in 4/35 (11%); abrupt closure in 2/35 (6%). Patients were screened for death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty during in-hospital stay and after a follow-up of 12 +/- 8 months. Even-free survival curve was constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Stent deployment was successful in all patients. One stent was deployed in 24/35 lesions (69%), half Palmaz-Schatz stent in 6/35 (17%) and 2 or more stents in 5/35 (14%). The balloon/vessel ratio resulted of 1.0 +/- 0.1 Minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.8 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.6 mm, with a mean gain of 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm (range 1.8-4.0 mm). During the in-hospital period 1 patient (3.2%) died and 1 (3.2%) had a non Q wave myocardial infarction. Therefore, the clinical success rate, was 94%. During the follow-up period, 2 patients died (6.9%), 2 (6.9%) developed a non Q wave myocardial infarction, 1 (3.4%) underwent bypass surgery and 3 (10.3%) underwent repeat angioplasty. The estimated 2-year event-free survival rate (free from myocardial infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) was 62%. In conclusion, Palmaz-Schatz stent deployment in focal, de novo vein grafts presents a high rate of procedural success, a low rate of acute complications and good long-term results.     

Physicians and surgeons during the French intervention and the Second Empire

Little is known about the frequency of adverse events in the year following stent placement in patients treated with aspirin and ticlopidine, without warfarin. We analyzed the first such 234 consecutive patients treated at our hospital between October 1994 and December 1995. Their mean age was 62+/-12 years; 40% had had a prior myocardial infarction, 22% had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery, and 65% had multivessel disease. The indication for stent placement was dissection or abrupt closure in 24% of patients and suboptimal balloon angioplasty results in 14%; placement was elective in 62% of patients. Three hundred forty-five coronary segments were treated in the 234 patients; 305 stents (1.3 stents/patient) were placed. Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents (75%), Gianturco-Roubin stents (21%), and Johnson & Johnson biliary stents (4%) were used. Mean nominal stent size was 3.4+/-0.4 mm. High-pressure inflations (> or = 14 atm, mean 17+/-2) were performed in all patients. The mean residual stenosis was 3+/-5% by visual estimate. Intravascular ultrasound was utilized to facilitate stent placement in 53% of patients. Mean follow-up was 1.6+/-0.5 years. There were no deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, coronary artery bypass operations, or repeat angioplasty procedures required during the remainder of the hospitalization or in 30 days after stent placement; stent thrombosis did not occur. Kaplan-Meier analysis of adverse events in the 6 months following the procedure revealed a mortality rate of 0.9%; the rate of myocardial infarction (Q-wave or non-Q-wave) was 1.3%. Bypass surgery was performed in 0.9% and angioplasty for in-stent restenosis was performed in 9.5% of patients. Any 1 of these events occurred in 11.7% of patients in the 6 months after the procedure. The corresponding event rates at 1 year were 1.3%, 2.2%, 3.5%, and 12.2%, respectively; any 1 of these events occurred in 16.5% of patients. In patients receiving intracoronary stents of varying designs followed by high-pressure postdeployment inflations in whom an excellent visual angiographic result is achieved, antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine is associated with a very low frequency of adverse cardiovascular events in the 12 months following the procedure regardless of the indication for stent placement.     

Coronary stenting in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate acute angiographic success, in-hospital complications and long-term outcome after intracoronary stenting in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. BACKGROUND: The application of conventional interventional modalities to treat discrete lesions in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy is associated with higher procedural morbidity, mortality and higher restenosis compared to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Elective coronary stenting has been shown to lower restenosis rates and improve long-term outcome in selected patients with native coronary artery disease; however, its safety and efficacy in reducing restenosis in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy is unknown. METHODS: Ten patients with 19 discrete lesions in a major coronary artery without diffuse distal disease underwent intracoronary stenting using Palmaz-Schatz stents. The average stent size was 3.4 mm, and the stent/artery ratio was 0.99+/-0.07. Eight of ten (80%) patients received antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus ticlopidine) only. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100% with no in-hospital stent thrombosis, Q-wave myocardial infarction or death. Minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.83+/-0.38 mm to 3.23+/-0.49 mm after stenting. Diameter stenosis decreased from 74.91+/-11.52% to 5.90+/-4.09% after stenting. Follow-up angiography was performed in 8 of 10 (80%) patients and 16 of 19 (84%) lesions. Target lesion revascularization was required in 2 of 10 (20%) patients and 3 of 16 (19%) lesions. Allograft survival was 7 of 10 (70%) at the end of 22+/-11 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary stenting can be performed safely with excellent angiographic success in selected patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The restenosis rate appears to be low despite the aggressive nature of the disease. A multicenter study with a larger number of patients is required to assess its efficacy in reducing restenosis and improving allograft survival.