Troglitazone decreases the proportion of small, dense LDL and increases the resistance of LDL to oxidation in obese subjects

OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance is associated with a predominance of small, atherogenic LDL particles that are more prone to oxidative modification. Treatment with the insulin-sensitizer troglitazone may improve LDL composition and resistance to oxidation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized double-blind crossover design, 15 obese subjects were treated with either 400 mg troglitazone daily or placebo for 8 weeks. Insulin sensitivity (clamp), (apo)lipoproteins, LDL subclass pattern, plasma TBARS, and ex vivo LDL oxidation were determined. RESULTS: Troglitazone treatment improved insulin sensitivity. LDL cholesterol increased from 2.58 +/- 0.18 to 2.77 +/- 0.20 mmol/l (P = 0.03) because of an increase in large (buoyant) LDL1 (from 0.45 +/- 0.04 to 0.62 +/- 0.09 mmol/l, P = 0.008). Because small (dense) LDL3 decreased, LDL1:LDL3 ratio increased (P = 0.02). Plasma TBARS concentration declined significantly, and the lag time of ex vivo LDL oxidation showed a small but significant increase. CONCLUSIONS: In obese subjects, treatment with troglitazone improves insulin sensitivity, increases the ratio of large buoyant to small dense LDL, and appears to enhance the resistance of the LDL particle to oxidation. These qualitative changes in lipoproteins may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk profile and compensate for a small increase in LDL cholesterol.     

Increase of the background human exposure to mercury through fish consumption due to gold mining at the Tapajós River region, Pará State, Amazon

Plasma and lipoprotein lipid composition and endogenous hepatic antioxidant status were investigated in hypertensive, 14-week-old spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats fed a standard commercial rat chow. Total plasma calcium and magnesium concentrations were similar between both rat strains; however, systolic blood pressure in SHR was greater than in WKY at 13 weeks of age (197 +/- 12 vs. 132 +/- 14 mmHg; p < or = 0.05), confirming hypertension in SHR. Total plasma cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations were lower (p < or = 0.05) in SHR compared with WKY. A lower (p < 0.05) HDL cholesterol level in SHR plasma resulted in a higher LDL to HDL cholesterol ratio compared with WKY counterparts. No significant differences in the relative proportion of HDL apolipoprotein A-I fraction were observed between SHR and WKY. Both SHR VLDL and HDL triacylglycerol fractions were lower (p < 0.05) in SHR than WKY. Analysis of liver antioxidant enzyme activities showed no differences in rat liver superoxide dismutase (SOD), but lower (p < 0.05) liver glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in SHR. However, liver glutathione (GSH) levels were similar in SHR and WKY counterparts. A possible compensatory effect to the oxidative status of SHR was suggested by the significant (p < 0.05) increase in both liver catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GSSG-Red) activities. Despite these results, in vitro oxidative challenge studies with H2O2 demonstrated a greater susceptibility of liver to GSH depletion in the SHR, although no parallel change in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) production was observed. The comparatively lower plasma cholesterol observed in hypertensive SHR paralleled specific differences in liver catalase and glutathione redox antioxidant enzyme activities.     

Short-term effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor on cholesterol and bile acid synthesis in humans

Competitive inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase improve hypercholesterolemia. However, reports about the effects of these agents on bile acid synthesis, the metabolic pathway of cholesterol, are conflicting. We studied the short-term effect on one of these agents, pravastatin, on bile acid synthesis. Six male volunteers were given 40 mg of pravastatin. Plasma mevalonate level (which reflects cholesterol synthesis) and 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one level (which reflects bile acid synthesis) were measured every 2 h for 8 h. These plasma levels were compared to those of the same volunteers without pravastatin. Plasma mevalonate level after 2 h was lower than control (3.0 +/- 1.1 ng/mL vs. 6.7 +/- 2.5, mean +/- SD; P < 0.05). This decrease continued for 8 h (2.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.2 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05). On the other hand, plasma 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one level did not change until after 6 h; then at 8 h it was lower than control (15.7 +/- 11.8 ng/mL vs. 24.7 +/- 16.9; P < 0.05). According to three-way layout analysis of variance, mevalonate level was influenced by both pravastatin treatment (P < 0.01) and time-course (P < 0.01). On the other hand, the 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one level was affected by both individual difference (P < 0.01) and time course (P < 0.01), but pravastatin treatment did not influence this compound. This indicates that bile acid synthesis was influenced by pravastatin, although cholesterol synthesis was inhibited. The short-term inhibition of cholesterol synthesis did not affect bile acid synthesis.     

Attenuation of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol by select 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in mice devoid of low density lipoprotein receptors

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction independent of LDL receptor regulation was investigated using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in LDL receptor-deficient mice. In males, LDL cholesterol dose-dependently decreased with atorvastatin treatment after 1 week. As untreated mice grew older, their LDL cholesterol progressively rose above basal levels, but was quelled with atorvastatin treatment. In females, atorvastatin treatment time-dependently decreased LDL cholesterol levels and induced hepatic HMG-CoA reductase activity. Unlike males, cholesterol-lowering effects of the drug were sustained in females. Lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin also reduced total and LDL cholesterol; however, additional studies in females demonstrated that atorvastatin caused the greatest dose-dependent and sustained effect after 2 weeks. In females, hepatic HMG-CoA reductase mRNA inversely correlated with LDL cholesterol lowering, with atorvastatin showing the greatest increase in mRNA levels (17.2-fold), followed by lovastatin (10.7-fold), simvastatin (4.1-fold), and pravastatin (2.5-fold). Atorvastatin effects on lipoprotein production were determined after acute (1 day) or chronic (2 week) treatment prior to intraperitoneal injection of Triton WR1339. Acute treatment reduced cholesterol (-29%) and apoB (-16%) secretion, with no change in triglyceride secretion. In contrast, chronic treatment elevated cholesterol (+20%), apoB (+31%), and triglyceride (+57%) secretion. Despite increased cholesterol and apoB secretion, plasma levels were reduced by 51% and 46%, respectively. Overall, under acute or chronic conditions, apoB paralleled cholesterol secretion rates, and triglyceride to cholesterol secretion ratios were elevated by 38% and 32%, respectively. We propose that atorvastatin limits cholesterol for lipoprotein assembly, which is compensated for by triglyceride enrichment. In addition, with either acute or chronic atorvastatin treatment, apoB-100 secretion was blocked, and compensated for by an increased secretion of apoB-48. The apoB-48 particles produced are cleared by LDL receptor-independent mechanisms, with an overall effect of reducing LDL production in these mice. These studies support the idea that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors modulate lipoprotein levels independent of LDL receptors, and suggest they may have utility in hyperlipidemias caused by LDLreceptor disorders.     

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in cholesterol gallstone disease: effects on hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, biliary lipid composition, and plasma lipid levels

The present study was undertaken to characterize the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on biliary lipid metabolism in man. Fifteen gallstone patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid at a daily dosage of 15 mg per kg body weight for about 4 weeks before cholecystectomy. At operation a liver biopsy, together with gallbladder and hepatic bile, were obtained. Eighteen untreated gallstone patients undergoing cholecystectomy served as controls. During treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, hepatic bile became unsaturated with cholesterol in all patients investigated. The total biliary lipid concentration remained unchanged. The hepatic cholesterol concentration decreased by about 20%. No significant change in the microsomal HMG CoA reductase activity was observed (38.5 +/- 6.7 pmol . min-1 . mg protein-1 vs 38.3 +/- 4.7 pmol . min-1 . mg protein-1 in the controls; means +/- SEM). Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol were reduced by about 10%, and those of high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 15%. Plasma triglyceride levels remained essentially unchanged during treatment. We conclude that, similar to chenodeoxycholic acid therapy, ursodeoxycholic acid treatment results in unsaturation of fasting hepatic bile. In contrast to the changes seen during chenodeoxycholic acid feeding, however, the unsaturation of hepatic bile during ursodeoxycholic acid treatment is not primarily related to a decreased hepatic HMG CoA reductase activity. Furthermore, while chenodeoxycholic acid tends to increase plasma LDL levels, such changes are not seen during ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.     

Radioimmunotherapy of orthotopically transplanted pancreatic cancer with 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody Nd2

Recent study demonstrated high susceptibility of plasma LDL to lipid peroxidative modification in patients with variant angina. Oxidized stress state, especially oxidized LDL, may induce coronary artery spasm by its impairing effect of endothelium-dependent arterial relaxation, but precise mechanisms remain unclear. Study subjects included 93 patients who underwent coronary angiographic examination: 12 patients with coronary artery spasm provoked by ergonovine without organic stenosis (group I), 11 patients who did not demonstrate coronary artery spasm or organic stenosis (group II) and 70 patients with organic coronary artery stenosis (group III). Levels of plasma HDL-cholesterol and apoA-I in group I were similar to those in III but were significantly lower than those in II, although the other plasma lipid parameters were not different among the three groups. The levels of TBARS in plasma and HDL were significantly higher in group I than in II or III (2.94+/-1.56 vs. 1.91+/-0.35 or 2.23+/-0.89 nmol MDA/ml and 1.23+/-1.00 vs. 0.54+/-0.37 or 0.70+/-0.63 nmol MDA/mg protein; P < 0.05), although the levels of TBARS in LDL were not significantly different. In the monitoring curve of diene production during copper-induced lipid peroxidation of HDL, its propagation slope was steeper and levels of maximum diene absorbance was higher in group I as compared with that in II or III, but not found in those of LDL. These results suggested that high susceptibility of HDL to lipid peroxidative modification in group I may contribute to the genesis of coronary artery spasm, and oxidized HDL rather than oxidized LDL is more likely to be related to coronary artery spasm.     

Effect of pravastatin treatment on glucose, insulin, and lipoprotein metabolism in patients with hypercholesterolemia

Treatment of patients with type IIA hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) with pravastatin for 3 months led to significant decreases (p < 0.001) in total cholesterol (7.18 +/- 0.30 to 5.75 +/- 0.30 mmol/L), LDL cholesterol (5.56 +/- 0.33 to 4.02 +/- 0.32 mmol/L), and ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (6.5 +/- 0.4 to 4.6 +/- 0.4). Decreases of a similar magnitude were also seen in patients with type IIB HLP. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations after an oral glucose load and from 8 AM to 4PM in response to meals were higher in patients with Type IIB HLP, who also had higher steady-state plasma glucose concentrations after an infusion of somatostatin, insulin, and glucose (12.4 +/- 1 vs 5.5 +/- 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Because steady-state plasma insulin concentrations were similar in both groups, patients with type IIB HLP were relatively insulin resistant. Furthermore, day-long plasma glucose concentrations and insulin resistance were modestly, but significantly (p < 0.01), greater after treatment in both groups. In conclusion, LDL cholesterol metabolism improved in hypercholesterolemic subjects treated with pravastatin, but the hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, relative glucose intolerance, and hyperinsulinemia present in patients with type IIB HLP either did not improve with treatment or was somewhat worse.     

The effectiveness and safety of low dose pravastatin in elderly hypertensive hypercholesterolemic subjects on antihypertensive therapy

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose (10 mg) pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly subjects undergoing antihypertensive treatment, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month trial was conducted. The subjects had a total plasma cholesterol of at least 250 mg/dL and had been, for at least 3 months, consuming a standard lipid-lowering diet (American Heart Association Step 1 Diet). Sixty elderly hypertensive patients randomly received placebo (n = 30) or pravastatin (n = 30) treatment. The dosage consisted of 10 mg of pravastatin daily during the 6-month trial. Over that period, in the pravastatin group, plasma levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol significantly (P < .01) dropped (-20% and -25%, respectively) compared to the placebo group. The plasma level of HDL-cholesterol increased (+5%) while triglycerides slightly decreased (-8%) (P < .05). No serious side effects occurred, and pravastatin was generally tolerated. Fasting hyperinsulinemia (11.0 +/- 0.8 v 9.3 +/- 0.7 microU/mL; P = .06) also improved, although not significantly, after 6 months of pravastatin therapy. Results from this study confirmed that a low dose (10 mg) of pravastatin daily is a safe and effective method of reducing plasma total and LDL-cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive elderly patients who are on concurrent antihypertensive drug therapy.     

Atorvastatin: an effective lipid-modifying agent in familial hypercholesterolemia

Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are the drugs of choice in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), which has a high risk of ischemic heart disease. An open-label study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, a new synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in proven FH. After a 4-week placebo phase, 22 subjects were randomized to either 80 mg atorvastatin at night (n = 11) or 40 mg twice a day for 6 weeks. The two dosage groups were well matched and had no difference in lipoprotein responses. After 6 weeks, the LDL cholesterol concentration was reduced by 57%, from 8.16 +/- 1.15 to 3.53 +/- 0.99 mmol/L (P < .001). The total cholesterol concentration decreased from 9.90 +/- 1.32 to 5.43 mmol/L (P < .001). HDL cholesterol concentration increased from 1.19 +/- 0.31 to 1.49 +/- 0.43 mmol/L (P < .001). Triglyceride concentrations decreased from 1.34 +/- 0.66 to 0.88 +/- 0.36 mmol/L (P < .01). Three subjects had single, transient increases of serum transaminase of up to twice the upper limit of normal. Apolipoprotein B concentration decreased significantly by 42%. Changes in apolipoproteins AI and (a) were not statistically significant. Nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis revealed increases in the size of smaller LDL particles in four subjects. Plasma fibrinogen concentration increased by 44%. The drug was well tolerated. One subject withdrew for personal reasons. Atorvastatin is a powerful and safe lipid-modifying agent for LDL cholesterol; it also modifies HDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, and may suffice as a single agent for many subjects with heterozygous FH.     

Retinoic acid enhances fibrinolytic activity in-vivo by enhancing tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity and inhibits venous thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin and pravastatin are both competitive inhibitors of the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol biosynthesis (HMG CoA) reductase, but data from individual clinical trials suggest significant differences in potency for cholesterol reduction between the two drugs. AIM: To assess any differences in efficacy and safety between simvastatin and pravastatin in a direct, comparative study. METHODS: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised study design was used, involving 48 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following a 6 week placebo baseline period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either simvastatin or pravastatin, commencing at a dose of 10 mg daily. The dose levels were titrated up to the recommended maximum effective dose of 40 mg daily at 6 weekly intervals if LDL cholesterol levels remained > or = 3.4 mmol/L. After 18 weeks of therapy, all patients were transferred to simvastatin therapy for a further 6 weeks, continuing at their week 18 dose level. Patients complied with a standard lipid lowering diet (containing < 30% of energy as total fat) throughout the study period. RESULTS: Over the 18 week direct comparison of the two drugs, there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in response between simvastatin and pravastatin for reduction in levels of total cholesterol (32% vs 21% respectively), LDL cholesterol (38% vs 27%) and apolipoprotein B levels (34% vs 23%). No significant difference in drug effect was seen for the small reduction in levels of apolipoprotein AI (5% vs 6% respectively), nor for the increased levels of apolipoprotein AII (14% vs 11%) and HDL cholesterol (11% vs 7%). Lp(a) levels remained unchanged. When pravastatin was replaced with simvastatin for the final 6 weeks of the study in the 23 patients initially randomised to pravastatin, there were further reductions (p < 0.01) in total and LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. These results establish the advantage of simvastatin over pravastatin in terms of efficacy, for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.     

Effect of felodipine on arterial blood flow and venous function at rest in patients with mild essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES: Lipid-lowering drugs as 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and cholestyramine are effective in reducing cardiovascular morbidity both in primary and secondary prevention. Patient compliance is an important determinant of the outcome of therapy. This study was designed to compare compliance with tolerance and lipid-lowering effectiveness of pravastatin and/or cholestyramine in primary care. DESIGN: Nine hundred and eighty nine women and 1047 men were randomized to treatment at 100 primary-care centres in Sweden. After dietary intervention, an eligible patient was randomly assigned to one of four programs of daily treatment: group Q, 16 g cholestyramine, group QP, 8 g cholestyramine and 20 mg pravastatin, group P20, 20 mg pravastatin or group P40, 40 mg pravastatin. RESULTS: In group Q, group QP, group P20 and group P40 the reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were 26%, 36%, 27% and 32%. The dose actually taken was 91-95% of the prescribed for the pravastatin treatment groups and 77-88% for the cholestyramine groups. In the pravastatin and cholestyramine groups 76-78% and 44-53%, respectively, completed the trial. Only 8-27% of the patients reached a serum cholesterol target level of 5.2 mmol L-1. There was no difference in lipid-lowering effect between women and men. CONCLUSION: Pravastatin alone is efficacious and compliance is high, independent of dose. Combined treatment with cholestyramine and pravastatin had a better cholesterol lowering effect (although not statistically significant) than 40 mg pravastatin. Despite this, only 8-27% of the patients actually reached a serum cholesterol level of 5.2 mmol L-1. No unexpected serious adverse events were detected in any of the treatment groups. As predicted, the gastrointestinal disturbances were more common on cholestyramine treatment. These two factors suggest that an increase in the dosage of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor may be appropriate. Results from other studies indicate that there also might be other positive effects of statin treatment beyond cholesterol lowering.     

Pravastatin experience in elderly and non-elderly patients

Epidemiologic evidence linking elevated cholesterol concentrations and coronary heart disease (CHD) through the eighth decade of life provides a rationale for lowering cholesterol concentrations to reduce morbidity and mortality from CHD. Pravastatin, a well tolerated HMG CoA reductase inhibitor with a convenient once-daily dosing regimen, has been shown to effectively lower total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Individual data from more than 1800 hypercholesterolemic patients enrolled in six double-blind, randomized, multicenter studies were pooled and then analyzed to compare the safety and efficacy of pravastatin in the elderly (i.e., patients at least 65 years old) and the non-elderly. In short-term studies (8-16 weeks), response was dose-related and similar in elderly and non-elderly subjects. Pravastatin 20 or 40 mg daily lowered total cholesterol 19-25%, LDL-cholesterol 25-33%, and triglycerides 14-23%; high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased 5-10%. During long-term studies, improvements were sustained for more than 24 months in both the non-elderly and elderly. The incidences of adverse drug events and laboratory abnormalities were similar in the elderly and non-elderly patients in all groups (active treatment control with resin, pravastatin alone, or combination therapy). In short-term studies, treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in < 1% of all patients treated with pravastatin (all doses) or placebo. The frequency and profile of adverse events were similar among patients treated with pravastatin or placebo. In long-term studies, treatment was discontinued in 0.4% of patients in the pravastatin group and in 0.3% of the patients in the bile-acid-binding resin group. If drug therapy is warranted, pravastatin appears to be safe and effective for long-term use in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

Cloning of a mouse smoothened cDNA and expression patterns of hedgehog signalling molecules during chondrogenesis and cartilage differentiation in clonal mouse EC cells, ATDC5

The effects of simvastatin and pravastatin administered alone at initial doses of 5 and 10 mg/day, respectively, on normalization of abnormal lipid metabolism in patients with hypercholesterolemia were evaluated by a crossover method. Patients whose serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) were > or = 220 mg/dl were randomly divided into two groups, and one of the groups (group S-P: 17 patients) was treated with simvastatin first and then with pravastatin whereas the other group (group P-S: 19 patients) was treated with pravastatin first and then with simvastatin. Simvastatin or pravastatin was replaced with the other drug after 8-week administration in each group. These drugs were administered for 8 weeks each. Simvastatin and pravastatin significantly reduced the following serum lipids as compared with the levels in the observation period: TC by 23.2 +/- 8.1% and 18.1 +/- 10.9%, triglyceride (TG) by 13.0 +/- 24.7% and 5.8 +/- 47.1%, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 31.3 +/- 10.1% and 23.1 +/- 14.3%, respectively. TC and LDL-C levels were significantly (p < 0.001) lower and decreased to significantly (p < 0.001) greater degrees after simvastatin treatment than after pravastatin treatment. TC was normalized in 77.8% of the patients (28 of 36) after simvastatin treatment and in 68.9% of the patients (23 of 36) after pravastatin treatment. LDL-C was normalized in 63.9% of the patients (23 of 36) after simvastatin treatment and in 44.4% of the patients (16 of 36) after pravastatin treatment. The percentage of patients whose LDL-C was normalized by simvastatin was significantly (p < 0.05) higher as compared with pravastatin. Results of this trial, which was conducted by a crossover method, show that the initial dose of simvastatin reduces serum cholesterol and LDL-C more potently than the initial dose of pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

Cholesterol synthesis inhibitors do not reduce Lp(a) levels in normocholesterolemic patients

Experimental and clinical data suggest that activation of the LDL receptors by the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, in the presence of normal plasma cholesterol levels, may result in a reduction of Lp(a) concentrations. This hypothesis has been tested in an open study on seven subjects with normal cholesterolemia but marked elevations of Lp(a) levels, three of whom received pravastatin and four simvastatin at standard therapeutic doses. While the two drugs caused the expected reduction of plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels, no significant changes in Lp(a) were noted. This study contradicts a prior clinical finding and suggests that HMG CoA reductase inhibitors are unlikely to reduce plasma Lp(a) levels even in the absence of hypercholesterolemia.     

Cerivastatin

Cerivastatin is a synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor with high liver selectivity, which lowers plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting endogenous cholesterol synthesis. In vitro, the affinity of cerivastatin for HMG-CoA reductase was higher than that of lovastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin. This higher enzyme affinity was reflected in vivo, with a lower ED50 (dose causing 50% inhibition) for cerivastatin in rats and beagle dogs compared with lovastatin. Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/day significantly reduced low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and increased high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, in patients with type IIa hypercholesterolaemia. Available data indicate that cerivastatin has a tolerability profile similar to that of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. No drug interactions were observed when cerivastatin was coadministered with digoxin, warfarin, cimetidine or the antacid magnesium/aluminium hydroxide.     

Protective role of the free glucocorticoid pool in development of autoimmune hemolytic anemia

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type II diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of coronary he disease. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pravastatin in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia. METHOD: In this 6-months study, 12 patients (4 men, 8 women, mean age 60.5 +/- 10.8 years), with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia (fasting plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels -LDL-C- > 130 mg/dl) received pravastatin 10 mg/day. The dose could be doubled after 4 weeks. Seven patients have chronic renal failure. RESULTS: Significant reductions in LDL-C (-19.1%, p < 0.05), total cholesterol (-16%, p < 0.01), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-29.2%, p < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (-21.5%, p < 0.05), and triglycerides (-26.0%, p < 0.01) were noted. No changes were found either in high-density-cholesterol or its fractions (HDL2 and HDL3) or in apolipoprotein A plasmatic levels. Pravastatin was well tolerated and no one side effect was detected. No clinically significant changes on the control of diabetes, renal function, as assessed by plasmatic creatinin and creatinin clearance, and proteinuria were seen during the follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that pravastatin is well tolerated and effective in lowering total cholesterol and LDL-C in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypercholesterolemia.     

Effects of two low-fat diets, high and low in polyunsaturated fatty acids, on plasma lipid peroxides and serum vitamin E levels in free-living hypercholesterolaemic men

Diet enriched with polyunsaturated fat may increase the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation. Therefore the effects of two low-fat diets on plasma lipid peroxides in free-living mildly hypercholesterolaemic men (n = 37) were investigated in a randomized single-blind 28-week study. Composition of the diets were (1) American Heart Association (AHA) type 32/10:8:8 (indicating percentages of energy from total fat/saturated fat:monoenes:polyenes in actual diet); (2) low-fat 30/12:8:3. The subjects kept 3-day dietary records five times during the study to estimate the intake of nutrients. Plasma lipid peroxides were measured photometrically as the thiobarbituric-acid reactive substances (TBARS). Levels of serum vitamin E during the study were also determined. Mean change (+/- SD) in serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was similar in both groups (-0.32 +/- 0.76 vs -0.32 +/- 0.87 mmol/l) (AHA type vs low-fat). Level of TBARS decreased (P < 0.05) during the AHA type diet (-8.4 +/- 37.1%) (mean +/- SD) and increased (P = 0.228) during the low-fat diet (+8.7 +/- 27.0%) from 0 to 6 months. The mean intake of total active tocopherols was greater (14.7 +/- 3.7 mg) during the AHA type diet compared to the low-fat diet (7.8 +/- 2.1 mg). Serum vitamin E to LDL cholesterol ratio increased from 8.9 +/- 2.9 to 9.6 +/- 2.4 nmol/mmol (0 vs 6 months) (P = 0.07) during the AHA type diet and from 8.6 +/- 2.6 to 9.3 +/- 2.4 nmol/mmol (P = 0.159) during the low-fat diet.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Detection of the change point in oxygen uptake during an incremental exercise test using recursive residuals: relationship to the plasma lactate accumulation and blood acid base balance

BACKGROUND: Lovastatin is oxidized by cytochrome P4503A to active metabolites but pravastatin is active alone and is not metabolized by cytochrome P450. Diltiazem, a substrate and a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A enzymes, is commonly coadministered with cholesterol-lowering agents. METHODS: This was a balanced, randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study in 10 healthy volunteers, with a 2-week washout period between the phases. Study arms were (1) administration of a single dose of 20 mg lovastatin, (2) administration of a single dose of 20 mg pravastatin, (3) administration of a single dose of lovastatin after administration of 120 mg diltiazem twice a day for 2 weeks, and (4) administration of a single dose of pravastatin after administration of 120 mg diltiazem twice a day for 2 weeks. RESULTS: Diltiazem significantly (P < .05) increased the oral area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of lovastatin from 3607 +/- 1525 ng/ml/min (mean +/- SD) to 12886 +/- 6558 ng/ml/min and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) from 6 +/- 2 to 26 +/- 9 ng/ml but did not influence the elimination half-life. Diltiazem did not affect the oral AUC, Cmax, or half-life of pravastatin. The average steady-state serum concentrations of diltiazem were not significantly different between the lovastatin (130 +/- 58 ng/ml) and pravastatin (110 +/- 30 ng/ml) study arms. CONCLUSION: Diltiazem greatly increased the plasma concentration of lovastatin, but the magnitude of this effect was much greater than that predicted by the systemic serum concentration, suggesting that this interaction is a first-pass rather than a systemic event. The magnitude of this effect and the frequency of coadministration suggest that caution is necessary when administering diltiazem and lovastatin together. Further studies should explore whether this interaction abrogates the efficacy of lovastatin or enhances toxicity and whether it occurs with other cytochrome P4503A4-metabolized 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, such as simvastatin, fluvastatin, and atorvastatin.     

Effects of one year of treatment with pravastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, on lipoprotein a

Lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] has emerged as a critical factor in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. In the study reported here, Lp(a) concentrations were monitored in patients taking pravastatin, a new hydrophilic, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. A cohort of patients with frozen plasma aliquots at baseline, week 12 of the double-blind therapy, and week 48 of open-label therapy (1 years' treatment) was selected from 306 participants in a phase 2 dose-ranging study of pravastatin. The 125 men and women in the cohort had mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations of at least 150 mg/dL (3.88 mmol/L), and mean plasma triglyceride concentrations less than 250 mg/dL (2.82 mmol/L) during the baseline diet phase. During the double-blind phase, 46 patients received placebo, and 79 received pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg daily. Only the 79 pravastatin-treated patients in the cohort continued in the 48-week open-label study of pravastatin. During the double-blind phase, Lp(a) decreased 4.6% in patients taking placebo, and 0.4% in patients taking pravastatin. Net change was not significant. At week 48, in the patients taking pravastatin, Lp(a) had increased 2.4%, a difference that again was not statistically significant. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-33.6%), total cholesterol (-25.6%), triglycerides (-19.9%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (+7.0%), apolipoprotein A-I (+13.3%), and apolipoprotein B (-33.0%) changed significantly (P < .01). Among 19 patients with baseline Lp(a) levels greater than 30 mg/dL, Lp(a) decreased insignificantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)