Compatibility of poly(p-fluorostyrene-co-o-fluorostyrene) with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and polystyrene

The compatibility of blends prepared from random copolymers of p-fluorostyrene and o-fluorostyrene with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) and blends of the copolymers with polystyrene (PS) has been examined using differential scanning calorimetry. It was found that compatibility in these systems depends on copolymer composition: copolymers containing from 10 to 38% of p-fluorostyrene are miscible with PPO in all proportions. The thermally induced phase separation in these systems was also studied and the existence of lower critical solution temperatures (LCST) was established for all compatible blends. The copolymers were found to be incompatible with PS regardless of composition.     

Compatibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/poly(fluorostyrene-co-chlorostyrene) blends

The compatibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with random copolymers of ortho- and para-fluorostyrene as well as with ortho- and para-chlorostyrene of various copolymer compositions was examined. The compatibility was studied by DSC and visual observation of film clarity. It was found that copolymers of ortho-fluorostyrene with para-chlorostyrene containing 15–74 mol % p-CIS are compatible with PPO in all proportions. Compatibility of the PPO/poly-(ortho-fluorostyrene-co-ortho-chlorostyrene) system was observed for copolymers containing between 15 and 36 mol % ortho-chlorostyrene. Copolymers of para-fluorostyrene with para-chlorostyrene, as well as copolymers of para-fluorostyrene with ortho-chlorostyrene appear to be incompatible with PPO at 210°C.     

Thermally induced phase separation in homogeneous blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene)

The phase separation behavior of initially compatible blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-pCIS)] and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-oCIS)] was studied by DSC. It was found that copolymers of poly(oFS-co-pCIS) containing between 15 and 62 mol % pCIS have shown no phase separation after annealing at temperatures up to 320°C. It was also observed that blends containing this copolymer with 74 mol % pCIS show phase separation at 250°C, which depended on blend composition. Additionally, all PPO/poly(oFS-co-oCIS) blends exhibit phase separation after annealing to a temperature of 230°C. Thermal degradation of the polymer blends was not observed at the temperatures studied.     

Phase behavior of blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/polystyrene/poly(o-chlorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) copolymer

The phase behavior of ternary blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO), polystyrene (PS) and a 50/50 mole % statistical copolymer of o-chlorostyrene and p-chlorostyrene [p(oClS-pClS)] has been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and analyzed in terms of a Flory-Huggins mean-field segmental interaction parameter treatment. Both PS/PPO and PPO/p(oClS-pClS) binary blends exhibit single glass transition temperatures over the full composition range whereas the PS/p(oClS-pClS) system displays a substantial immiscibilty window which extends into the ternary phase diagram. In principle, ternary systems provide enhanced opportunities relative to binary systems for evaluating segmental interaction parameters χ_ijs from experimental data because of the high sensitivity of phase boundary locations to these parameters and to component molecular weights. In this system the effect of these parameters on the phase boundary was studied experimentally and compared to calculated values.     

Effect of pressure on phase behavior in polymer blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) and poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-fluorostyrene) copolymers

The effect of pressure on miscibility and phase separation in blends of random copolymers of ortho- and para-fluorostyrene, P(o-FS-co-p-FS) and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), PPO, has been studied by differential thermal analysis (DTA) at pressures up to 300 MPa. At 200 MPa the copolymers containing from 10 to 38 mol% p-FS are miscible with PPO below 230°C using the customary criterion of a single calorimetric glass transition temperature (T_g). Each blend undergoes phase separation upon annealing at higher temperatures at both atmospheric and elevated pressures indicating the presence of a lower critical solution temperature (LCST). When the phase behaviors of the 50/50 wt% blends are examined as a function of temperature and copolymer composition, a symmetric miscibility “window” can be observed in the resulting temperature-composition diagram with a maximum at about 22 mol% p-FS. In a complementary set of experiments, the pressure dependence of the phase boundary for the blend of PPO and P(o-FS-co-p-FS) in which the copolymer contained 29 mol% p-FS was studied. The temperature minimum of the phase boundary is at about 50 wt% PPO and is independent of pressure. The consolute temperature, T_c, increases at about 0.1₀°C/MPa up to 200 MPa and then becomes independent of pressure to reach an asymptotic value at around 270°C. Similar behavior is also observed for blends in which the copolymer composition contains either 16 or 23 mol% p-FS. In these blends the decrease of dT_c/dP at higher pressures may indicate that the negative volume of mixing approaches zero above 200 MPa. This study shows therefore, that pressure no longer plays a role in increasing the miscibility above 200 MPa.     

Partial miscibility in the system poly(para-chlorostyrene-co-ortho-chlorostyrene)/poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

The compatibility of random copolymers of para-chlorostyrene and ortho-chlorostyrene (PO copolymers) with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.). Blends prepared by compression moulding of coprecipitated powders display either one or two glass transitions, dependent on the composition of the copolymer component of the blend. PO copolymers of para-chlorostyrene content from 23 to 64% are miscible with PPO in all proportions, using the customary criteria of a single calorimetric glass relaxation and optical clarity. Both homopolymers poly(para-chlorostyrene) (P_pClS) and poly(ortho-chlorostyrene) (P_oClS) are found to be incompatible with PPO; such blends exhibit two glass transitions at temperatures characteristic of the pure component phases. All compatible PO-PPO blends undergo phase separation upon annealing at elevated temperatures, indicating that a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) must exist. The phase separation is found to be reversible by annealing below the LCST, at temperatures which are still above the glass transitions of both blend components.     

Compatibility and morphology studies of PPO multicomponent blends

The compatibility and phase morphology of poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) multicomponent blends with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polystyrene (PS) were studied using differential-scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. The effect of glycidyl methacrylate–styrene copolymer (GMS), as a compatibilizer, on the morphology of the PPO blends has also been studied in detail. The influence of the molecular weight of PET and the synergetic effect of the compatibilizers of GMS and phenoxy (PN) on the morphology were examined. The DSC and DMA results show that two distinct glass transitions corresponding to PET and PPO existed; however, the T_g of PPO shifts toward lower temperature region due to the addition of GMS and PS. The SEM results reveal that PET component exists as dispersed phases in the PPO matrix, while PS is miscible in the PPO matrix. A significant improvement of the compatibility was achieved for the PPO multicomponent blends because of the synergetic effect of GMS and phenoxy. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Phase behavior for blends of styrene containing triblock copolymers with poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

The extent to which the styrene end-blocks of three commercially available triblock copolymers can mix with a particular poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (M_n = 22,600 and M_w = 34,000) or PPO has been examined by investigation of the glass transition behavior of the PPO and polystyrene (PS) portions of the blends using differential scanning calorimetry. Each block copolymer has a butadiene-based mid-block which was hydrogenated for two of these materials, but not the third. The three copolymers differ substantially in overall molecular weight and in molecula weight of the blocks. However, in analogy with the literature on blends of homopolymer polystyrene with styrene-based block copolymers, the molecular weight of the PS block should be the principal factor affecting the phase behavior in the present blends. Mixtures of the PPO with the block copolymers having PS blocks with M = 14,500 (nonhydrogenated midblock) and with M = 29,000 (hydrogenated mid-block) exhibited single composition-dependent T_gs for the hard phase, indicating complete mixing of PS segments with the PPO, for all proportions. On the other hand, the block copolymer having a PS block with M = 7,500 and a hydrogenated mid-block exhibited two separate hard phase T_gs corresponding to an essentially pure PPO phase and a PS-rich phase. For blends of homopolymer PS with styrene-based block copolymers, the similar two-phase behavior of the glassy portion can be readily explained by entropic considerations. For the present case, the favorable enthalpic contribution for mixing PPO and PS is an additional factor which seems to influence the restrictions on molecular weight for complete mixing; however, additional work is needed to develop a more quantitative assessment of this new issue.     

Synthesis of block copolymers with thermodynamically compatible chain segments: di‐ and triblock copolymers of polystyrene and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Mono‐ and bifunctional poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) macroinitiators for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were prepared by esterification of mono‐ and bishydroxy telechelic PPO with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The macroinitiators were used for ATRP of styrene to give block copolymers with PPO and polystyrene (PS) segments, namely PPO‐block‐PS and PS‐block‐PPO‐block‐PS. Various ligands were studied in combination with CuBr as ATRP catalysts. Kinetic investigations revealed controlled polymerization processes for certain ligands and temperature ranges. Thermal analysis of the block copolymers by means of DSC revealed only one glass transition temperature as a result of the compatibility of the PS and PPO chain segments and the formation of a single phase; this glass transition temperature can be adjusted over a wide temperature range (ca 100–199 °C), depending on the composition of the block copolymer. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

NMR characterization of intermolecular interactions for polymers,IV. Intermolecular interactions of low molecular weight analogues for compatible blends of polystyrene and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

The intermolecular interaction, IMI, leading to the compatibility of polystyrene, PS, and poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), PPO, has been identified by analyzing the IMI of the model compounds of low molecular weight; cumene, styrene oligomer, 2,6-dimethyl phenol, and its trimer. The IMI has been detected and identified applying Rummens' method for the analysis of the solvent-induced changes in NMR chemical shifts. The results indicate that the driving force in the formation of the compatible blend of PS and PPO is the π-hydrogen bond between the electrodeficient methyl groups in PPO and π-orbitals in PS. There were no indications that n-hydrogen bonds are formed between ring hydrogens of PS and the oxygen in PPO.     

Thermal and NMR Studies of Polystyrene Blends

Abstract

The effect of addition of poly (propylene oxide) (PPO) and polystyrene with low molecular weight (LPS) to polystyrene (PS) was investigated blending these polymers in a Haake internal mixer. The PPO and LPS range was established up to 10% by weight. The blends were analysed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at solid state (NMR), using conventional NMR techniques as cross-polarisation/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) and proton spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T ₁ ^H _p ). The addition of 1 and 5% of PPO and 5% of LPS to PS made the blends of PS/PPO and PS/LPS more rigid.     

Relationship between structure and properties in high‐performance PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends: The role of PPO and PS

This work aimed at studying the role of poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) and polystyrene (PS) in toughening polyamide‐6 (PA6)/styrene‐ethylene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) blends. The effects of weight ratio and content of PPO/PS on the morphology and mechanical behaviors of PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends were studied by scanning electron microscope and mechanical tests. Driving by the interfacial tension and the spreading coefficient, the “core–shell” particles formed by PPO/PS (core) and SEBS‐g‐MA (shell) played the key role in toughening the PA6 blends. As PS improved the distribution of the “core–shell” particles due to its low viscosity, and PPO guaranteed the entanglement density of the PPO/PS phase, the 3/1 weight ratio of PPO/PS supplied the blends optimal mechanical properties. Within certain range, the increased content of PPO/PS could supply more efficient toughening particles and bring better mechanical properties. Thus, by adjusting the weight ratio and content of PPO and PS, the PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends with excellent impact strength, high tensile strength, and good heat deflection temperature were obtained. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45281.     

Improvement of the dispersion degree in incompatible polystyrene/poly(n-butylmethacrylate) blends by the graft poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) on poly(n-butylmethacrylate)

Summary Using optical and electron microscopy it is evidenced that the introduction of graft copolymer poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) on poly (n-butylmethacrylate) improves substantially the degree of dispersion in the incompatible polymer blend polystyrene/poly (n-butylmethacrylate). The action of the copolymer is attributed-besides the mutual dissolution of the PBMA sequences — to the compatiblity between the PPO-grafts and the PS component of the blend. This is supported by the Tg data which show that the Tg of the PS in the blend is influenced by the present graft copolymer. The observed decrease of the Tg is explained by the concomitant admittance in the PS phase of the PBMA backbone together with the PPO grafts.     

Mechanical and morphological behavior in polystyrene based compatible polymer blends

Mechanical and morphological behavior of polystyrene (PS) based compatible polymer blend systems were studied using a tensile tester and scanning electron and optical microscopes. Four different binary compatible blend systems were employed and characterized: PS and poly (2,6-dimethyl 1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO), PS and poly(vinylmethylether)(PVME), PS and poly(α-methyl styrene)(PαMS), and PPO and PαMS. The compositional dependence of the mechanical properties showed a synergistic effect with respect to modulus, but a negative deviation from the rule of mixtures relationship for strain at break. From the scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations, a deformation mode transition from crazing to crazing and shear banding occurs at ˜25 wt% PPO in the PS/PPO blends, as indicated by the patch and river patterns above this composition. In the PS/PVME blends, a similar transition was observed at >10 wt% PVME. The PS/PαMS blends showed brittle fracture regardless of composition. The PPO/PαMS blends showed a brittle fracture for a PαMS content >25 wt%. Optical microscope (OM) observations showed that blending of PS/PPO and PS/PVME resulted in a decrease of craze density and length as the PPO and PVME content was increased. PS/PαMS and PPO/PαMS blends showed few crazes, all of which were localized near the fracture surface. The mechanical and morphological behavior can be explained using models of intermolecular interactions and entanglement density in compatible blends, respectively. Overall the mechanical property and the consequent morphological behavior were similar to the effect of antiplasticization.     

In situ compatibilization of PET/PS blends through reactive copolymers

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polystyrene (PS) are immiscible and incompatible, which has been well recognized. Styrene–glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymer has been synthesized by suspension polymerization and employed in this study as an in situ compatibilizer for the polyblends of PET and PS. This copolymer contains reactive epoxy functional groups that are able to react with PET end groups ? OH and ? COOH) under melt conditions to from SG-graft-PET copolymer. The presence of a small amount of phosphonium catalyst (200 ppm) accelerated the graft reaction and results in a better compatibilized blend. The compatibilized PET/PS blend has a smaller phase domain and higher viscosity than does the corresponding noncompatibilized blend. Mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends have also been improved significantly over the corresponding noncompatibilized blends. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Rheological behavior of polymer blends

Steady and oscillatory shearing flow properties of compatible and incompatible polymer blend systems were measured, using a cone-and-plate rheometer. The compatible blend systems investigated are blends of two low-density polyethylenes (LDPE) having different values of molecular weight and blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). The incompatible blend system investigated is a blend of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with polystyrene (PS). It was found that (1) plots of first normal stress difference (τ₁₁ – τ₂₂) vs. shear stress (τ₁₂) and plots of storage modulus (G′) vs. loss modulus (G″) for the LDPE blends become independent of temperature and blend composition; (2) plots of τ₁₁ – τ₂₂ vs. τ₁₂, and G′ vs. G″ for the PMMA/PVDF blends become independent of temperature but dependent upon blend composition. It was found further that, for the incompatible PMMA/PS blends, the dependence of τ₁₁ – τ₂₂ on blend composition, when plotted against τ₁₂, is different from the dependence of G′ on blend composition, when plotted against G″. However, in both compatible and incompatible blend systems, plots of τ₁₁ – τ₂₂ vs. τ₁₂ and plots of G′ versus G″ are independent of temperature. The seemingly complicated composition-dependent rheological behavior of the incompatible blend system is explained with the aid of photomicrographs describing the state of dispersion.     

Morphologies of an Amphiphilic Diblock Copolymer of Poly (Ethylene Oxide)-b-Polystyrene and Its Blends with Poly (2,6-Dimethyl-1,4-Oxide)

Systems containing block copolymers are of great interest due to the ability of copolymers to self-assemble into a variety of structured, ordered, or partially ordered morphologies. A fascinating morphology of two-dimensional arrays of hexagonal-like holes was observed for the first time in the diblock copolymer of poly (ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene (PEO-b-PS) by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The blends of PEO-b-PS with poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) were obtained by solution blending, and the morphologies of PEO nano-dispersed particles in PPO/PS matrix were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and TEM. Using the film forming technique on water/air interface, the core-shell morphology with PEO as shells was obtained in PEO-b-PS/PPO blends. Thus, three different morphologies were obtained by controlling preparation conditions. Especially, PEO-b-PS self-organized into the hexagonal-like holes patterns was first found to our knowledge.     

Synthesis,Chiroptical, and Redox Properties of Ferrocene‐Containing Optically Active Polymers

The Sonogashira–Hagihara coupling polymerization of ferrocene‐containing l ‐phenylalanine‐derived optically active o‐, m‐, p‐substituted bis(iodophenylene) monomers 1o , 1m , 1p with 1,4‐diethynylbenzene ( 2 ) and 1,4‐diethynyl‐2,5‐bis[2‐(2‐methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzene ( 3 ) is carried out to obtain the corresponding polymers consisting of ferrocene, amino acid, and phenyleneethynylene moieties. In the solution state, poly( 1o ‐ 2 ), poly( 1o‐3 ), and poly( 1m ‐ 2 ) exhibit no circular dichroism (CD) signals in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF), while poly( 1m‐3 ), poly( 1p ‐ 2 ), and poly( 1p ‐ 3 ) exhibit CD signals assignable to the main chain chromophore, indicating the formation of certain chiral structures. In the solid state, poly( 1o ‐ 2 ), poly( 1o‐3 ), poly( 1m ‐ 2 ), and poly( 1m‐3 ) exhibit CD signals in the solid state, while poly( 1p ‐ 2 ), poly( 1p ‐ 3 ) does not, indicating the different aggregation manners of the polymers in the solution and solid states. The monomer and the polymers exhibit redox properties assignable to the ferrocene moieties. Thermal gravimetry analysis (TGA) measurements reveal that a 30% weight reduction occurs at 500 °C yielding black ferromagnetic solids.     

Properties and radiation resistance of aromatic polymer-based polyblends

Blends of either of two different poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) derivatives with poly(2-vinylnaphthalene) (P2VN) were prepared by casting from chloroform. The content of P2VN in the blends ranged from 0 to 25 wt % for each PPO derivative. Two kinds of PPO derivatives, p–t-butylbenzoyl poly(phenylene oxide) (p–t-BB-PPO) and benzoyl poly(phenylene oxide) (B-PPO), were used. The effects of the addition of P2VN to PPO derivatives were investigated by their thermal stability, light-resistance, and tensile properties. Even though the addition of P2VN to the PPO derivatives decrease the mechanical properties, the radiation resistance was improved. The radiation resistance and tensile properties of B-PPO and its blends with P2VN were higher than those of the p–t-BB-PPO and its blends with P2VN. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 1697–1705, 1999     

Blends of a PPO–PS alloy with a liquid crystalline polymer

Blends of a PPO–PS alloy with a liquid crystalline polymer have been studied for their dynamic properties, rheology, mechanical properties, and morphology. This work is an extension of our previous work on PPO/LCP blends. The addition of the LCP to the PPO–PS alloy resulted in a marked reduction in the viscosity of the blends and increased processibility. The dynamic studies showed that the alloy is immiscible and incompatible with the LCP at all concentrations. The tensile properties of the blends showed a drastic increase with the increase in LCP concentration, thus indicating that the LCP acted as a reinforcing agent. The tensile strength, secant modulus, and impact strength of the PPO–PS/LCP blends were significantly higher than that of PPO/LCP blends. Morphology of the injection molded samples of the PPO–PS/LCP blends showed that the in situ formed fibrous LCP phase was preserved in the solidified form. A distinct skin–core morphology was also seen for the blends, particularly with low LCP concentrations. The improvement of the mechanical properties of the blends is attributed to these in situ fibers of LCP embedded in the PPO–PS matrix. The improvement in the properties of PPO–PS/LCP over PPO/LCP is also attributed to the addition of the PS which consolidates the matrix. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.