Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective

The use of multi-objective optimization techniques is attractive to incorporate environmental objectives into the design of energy conversion systems. A method to locally optimize a given process while considering its global environmental impact by using life cycle assessment (LCA) to account for avoidable and unavoidable off-site emissions for each independent material input is presented. It is applied to study the integration of a CO₂-capture process using monoethanolamine in a natural gas-combined cycle power plant, simultaneously optimizing column dimensions, heat exchange, and absorbent flow configuration with respect to two objectives: the levelized cost of electricity and its life cycle global-warming potential. The model combines a process flow-sheeting model and a separate process-integration model. After optimization using an evolutionary algorithm, the results showed that widening the absorber and generating near-atmospheric pressure steam are cost-effective options but that increasing stripper complexity is less so. With $7.80/GJ natural gas and $20/ton CO₂ handling, the minimum on-site CO₂ abatement cost reaches $62.43/ton on a life cycle basis, achieved with a capture rate of over 90%. Of this, $2.13/ton is related to off-site emissions – a specific advantage of LCA that could help industries and governments anticipate the actual future costs of CO₂ capture.     

Evaluation of ecological impacts of synthetic natural gas from wood used in current heating and car systems

A promising option to substitute fossil energy carriers by renewables is the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from wood, as this results in a flexible energy carrier usable via existing infrastructure in gas boilers or passenger cars. The comprehensive life cycle-based ecological impact of SNG is investigated and compared with standard fuels delivering the same service (natural gas, fuel oil, petrol/diesel, and wood chips). Life cycle impact assessment methodologies and external costs from airborne emissions provide measures of overall damage. The results indicate that the SNG system has the best ecological performance if the consumption of fossil resources is strongly weighted. Otherwise natural gas performs best, as its supply chain is energy-efficient and its use produces relatively low emissions. Wood systems are by far the best in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), where SNG emits about twice as much as the wood chips system. The main negative aspects of the SNG system are NO_x and particulate emissions and the relatively low total energy conversion efficiency resulting from the additional processing to transform wood to gas. Direct wood combustion has a better ecological score when highly efficient particulate filters are installed. SNG performs better than oil derivatives with all the evaluation methods used. External costs for SNG are the lowest as long as GHG are valued high. SNG should preferably be used in cars, as the reduction of overall ecological impacts and external costs when substituting oil-based fuels is larger for current cars than for heating systems.     

Baseload electricity from wind via compressed air energy storage (CAES)

This study investigates two methods of transforming intermittent wind electricity into firm baseload capacity: (1) using electricity from natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC) power plants and (2) using electricity from compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plants. The two wind models are compared in terms of capital and electricity costs, CO₂ emissions, and fuel consumption rates. The findings indicate that the combination of wind and NGCC power plants is the lowest-cost method of transforming wind electricity into firm baseload capacity power supply at current natural gas prices (∼$6/GJ). However, the electricity supplied by wind and CAES power plants becomes economically competitive when the cost of natural gas for electric producers is $10.55/GJ or greater. In addition, the Wind-CAES system has the lowest CO₂ emissions (93% and 71% lower than pulverized coal power plants and Wind-NGCC, respectively) and the lowest fuel consumption rates (9 and 4 times lower than pulverized coal power plants and Wind-NGCC, respectively). As such, the large-scale introduction of Wind-CAES systems in the U.S. appears to be the prudent long-term choice once natural gas price volatility, costs, and climate impacts are all considered.     

Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage

The evaluation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from power generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical factor in energy and policy analysis. The current paper examines life cycle emissions from three types of fossil-fuel-based power plants, namely supercritical pulverized coal (super-PC), natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), with and without CCS. Results show that, for a 90% CO₂ capture efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions are reduced by 75–84% depending on what technology is used. With GHG emissions less than 170 g/kWh, IGCC technology is found to be favorable to NGCC with CCS. Sensitivity analysis reveals that, for coal power plants, varying the CO₂ capture efficiency and the coal transport distance has a more pronounced effect on life cycle GHG emissions than changing the length of CO₂ transport pipeline. Finally, it is concluded from the current study that while the global warming potential is reduced when MEA-based CO₂ capture is employed, the increase in other air pollutants such as NO_x and NH₃ leads to higher eutrophication and acidification potentials.     

Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG): A solution to China’s energy security and CO2 reduction?

Considering natural gas (NG) to be the most promising low-carbon option for the energy industry, large state owned companies in China have established numerous coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) projects. The objective of this paper is to use a system approach to evaluate coal-derived SNG in terms of life-cycle energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions. This project examined main applications of the SNG and developed a model that can be used for evaluating energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions of various fuel pathway systems. The model development started with the GREET model, and added the SNG module and an end-use equipment module. The database was constructed with Chinese data. The analyses show when the SNG are used for cooking, power generation, steam production for heating and industry, life-cycle energies are 20–108% higher than all competitive pathways, with a similar rate of increase in life-cycle CO₂ emissions. When a compressed natural gas (CNG) car uses the SNG, life-cycle CO₂ emission will increase by 150–190% compared to the baseline gasoline car and by 140–210% compared to an electric car powered by electricity from coal-fired power plants. The life-cycle CO₂ emission of SNG-powered city bus will be 220–270% higher than that of traditional diesel city bus. The gap between SNG-powered buses and new hybrid diesel buses will be even larger—life-cycle CO₂ emission of the former being around 4 times of that of the latter. It is concluded that the SNG will not accomplish the tasks of both energy conservation and CO₂ reduction.     

Life cycle assessment of H2 generation with high temperature electrolysis

Water electrolysis is a well-established process for hydrogen production but requires efficiency improvements to reduce costs. High temperature electrolysis (HTE) as a means to higher efficiency was advanced in the EU project RelHY. Through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), also the environmental performance of five HTE-based hydrogen production systems was evaluated: operation with power and steam from a nuclear plant, continuous and intermittent operation with wind power and water, intermittent operation with natural gas or biogas reforming as back-up. Large scale natural gas reforming (NGR) was used as a reference. The LCA aims to identifying environmental hotspots of HTE plants and comparing their operation. The results show that stack manufacturing has the strongest impact during construction of the HTE plant while the impacts during H₂ production are largely due to power supply. All HTE variants studied lead to less life cycle CO₂-equivalent emissions than NGR. However, only the wind powered HTE variants without back-up use less energy than NGR. The other impacts and flows show different patterns. The results and limitations of the study are discussed.     

Multi-objective,multi-period optimization of biomass conversion technologies using evolutionary algorithms and mixed integer linear programming (MILP)

The design and operation of energy systems are key issues for matching energy supply and demand. A systematic procedure, including process design and energy integration techniques for sizing and operation optimization of poly-generation technologies is presented in this paper. The integration of biomass resources as well as a simultaneous multi-objective and multi-period optimization, are the novelty of this work. Considering all these concepts in an optimization model makes it difficult to solve. The decomposition approach is used to deal with this complexity.Several options for integrating biomass in the energy system, namely back pressure steam turbines, biomass rankine cycles (BRC), biomass integrated gasification gas engines (BIGGE), biomass integrated gasification gas turbines, production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles (BIGCC), are considered in this paper. The goal is to simultaneously minimize costs and CO₂ emission using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (EMOO) and Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP).Finally the proposed model is demonstrated by means of a case study. The results show that the simultaneous production of electricity and heat with biomass and natural gas are reliable upon the established assumptions. Furthermore, higher primary energy savings and CO₂ emission reduction, 40%, are obtained through the gradual increase of renewable energy sources as opposed to natural gas usage. However, higher economic profitability, 52%, is achieved with natural gas-based technologies.     

Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage

CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) is receiving considerable attention as a potential greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation option for fossil fuel power plants. Cost and performance estimates for CCS are critical factors in energy and policy analysis. CCS cost studies necessarily employ a host of technical and economic assumptions that can dramatically affect results. Thus, particular studies often are of limited value to analysts, researchers, and industry personnel seeking results for alternative cases. In this paper, we use a generalized modeling tool to estimate and compare the emissions, efficiency, resource requirements and current costs of fossil fuel power plants with CCS on a systematic basis. This plant-level analysis explores a broader range of key assumptions than found in recent studies we reviewed for three major plant types: pulverized coal (PC) plants, natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plants, and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems using coal. In particular, we examine the effects of recent increases in capital costs and natural gas prices, as well as effects of differential plant utilization rates, IGCC financing and operating assumptions, variations in plant size, and differences in fuel quality, including bituminous, sub-bituminous and lignite coals. Our results show higher power plant and CCS costs than prior studies as a consequence of recent escalations in capital and operating costs. The broader range of cases also reveals differences not previously reported in the relative costs of PC, NGCC and IGCC plants with and without CCS. While CCS can significantly reduce power plant emissions of CO₂ (typically by 85–90%), the impacts of CCS energy requirements on plant-level resource requirements and multi-media environmental emissions also are found to be significant, with increases of approximately 15–30% for current CCS systems. To characterize such impacts, an alternative definition of the “energy penalty” is proposed in lieu of the prevailing use of this term.     

Identifying environmentally and economically optimal bioenergy plant sizes and locations: A spatial model of wood-based SNG value chains

The optimal size and location of bioenergy plants with regards to environmental and economic performance are assessed with a spatially explicit value chain model of the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from wood. It consists of several individual models for the availability, harvest, transportation, conversion of wood to SNG, electricity and heat, and the use of these products to substitute non-renewable energy services. An optimization strategy is used to choose the optimal technology configuration for plant sizes from 5 to 200 MW and different locations for any desired weighting between the environmental performance based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and the economic performance.While the economic optima are found at plant sizes between 100 and 200 MW, the environmental optima are found in the range of 5–40 MW. This trade-off can be minimized at plant sizes above 25 MW according to the presented model. The most important driver of the environmental performance is the efficient substitution of non-renewable energy, which is a site-specific factor. In comparison to this, spatial factors such as wood availability, harvest, and transportation, have a smaller influence on the environmental performance, at least for a country of the size of Switzerland. The main drivers of the economic performance are the revenues from the sale of the SNG plant's products and the SNG production costs, but transportation and wood costs also play a role.     

Natural gas combined cycle with exhaust gas recirculation and CO2 capture at part-load operation

This paper aims to evaluate part-load operation of a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and a CO₂ capture plant. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and the advantages of EGR at full load, but operation at part load is also important because it is a common condition when NGCC power plants are being used as backup for renewables. The results of this study show that the number of absorber trains is reduced from 4 to 3 with EGR. The efficiency of the NGCC plant with EGR was 0.5% points higher than a conventional NGCC at full load as a result of a higher CO₂ concentration in the flue gas. However, this efficiency advantage decreased as the load was reduced from 100% to 50%, with both cases presenting the same efficiency at 50% load. This means that there was no benefit from the effect of EGR at lower loads. The efficiency of a NGCC plant with EGR and CO₂ capture configuration decreased from 52.6% to 45.9% when the load was reduced from 100% to 50% compared with a conventional NGCC where the efficiency changed from 52.1% to 45.9%. It was concluded that a NGCC plant with EGR and CO₂ capture is viable, results in lower capital costs due to the smaller number of absorber trains and yields slightly higher efficiencies, for operation at part-load down to 50%.     

Technical assessment of synthetic natural gas （SNG） production from agricul- ture residuals

This paper presents thermodynamic evaluations of the agriculture residual-to-SNG process by thermochemical conversion, which mainly consists of the interconnected fluidized beds, hot gas cleaning, fluidized bed methanation reactor and Selexol absorption unit. The process was modeled using Aspen Plus software. The process performances, i.e., CH 4 content in SNG, higher heating value and yield of SNG, exergy efficiencies with and without heat recovery, unit power consumption, were evaluated firstly. The results indicate that when the other parameters remain unchanged, the steam-to-biomass ratio at carbon boundary point is the optimal value for the process. Improving the preheating temperatures of air and gasifying agent is beneficial for the SNG yield and exergy efficiencies. Due to the effects of CO 2 removal efficiency, there are two optimization objectives for the SNG production process: (I) to maximize CH 4 content in SNG, or (II) to maximize SNG yield. Further, the comparison among different feedstocks indicates that the decreasing order of SNG yield is: corn stalk > wheat straw > rice straw. The evaluation on the potential of agriculture-based SNG shows that the potential annual production of agriculture residual-based SNG could be between 555×10 8～611×10 8 m 3 with utilization of 100% of the available unexplored resources. The agriculture residual-based SNG could play a significant role on solving the big shortfall of China’s natural gas supply in future.     

Techno-economic analysis of adiabatic four-stage CO2 methanation process for optimization and evaluation of power-to-gas technology

Owing to increasing demands for clean energy, caused by global warming, renewable energy sources have attracted significant attention. However, these sources can affect the reliability of electrical grids owing to their intermittency. Power-to-gas technology is expected to help address this issue. In this study, the CO₂ methanation process, which yields synthetic natural gas (SNG) via the synthesis of CO₂ and H₂ through proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis using surplus electricity generated from renewable energy, was evaluated and optimized based on techno-economic analyses. Requirements for the introduction of SNG produced through CO₂ methanation in domestic natural gas markets are presented by considering various scenarios. Results indicate that, even if the electricity costs, including system marginal price and renewable energy costs, are minimal, the costs for PEM water electrolysis and CO₂ methanation must be reduced by ~$550/kW and 25%, respectively, relative to current levels for the viable introduction of SNG in domestic markets.     

Multi-criteria optimization of a district cogeneration plant integrating a solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine combined cycle,heat pumps and chillers

A simultaneous optimization of the design and operation of a district heating, cooling and power generation plant supplying a small stock of residential buildings has been undertaken with regards to cost and CO₂ emissions. The simulation of the plant considers a superstructure including a solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine combined cycle, a compression heat pump, a compression chiller and/or an absorption chiller and an additional gas boiler. The Pareto-frontier obtained as the global solution of the optimization problem delivers the minimal CO₂ emission rates, achievable with the technology considered for a given accepted investment, or respectively the minimal cost associated with a given emission abatement commitment.     

Process simulation and integration of IGCC systems for H2/syngas/electricity generation with control on CO2 emissions

IGCC is a pre-combustion technology that can be effectively used to produce both hydrogen and electricity while reducing the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Two process models are developed in Aspen Plus^® software and are compared techno-economically. The conventional design of IGCC process is taken as case 1, whereas, case 2 represents the conceptual design of sequential integration of reforming model with the gasification unit to enhance the syngas yield. The case 2 utilizes the steam generated in the gasification process to sustain the methane reforming process which consequently enhances both the H₂ production capacity and cold gas efficiency. It has been analyzed from results that case 2 can enhance the process performance by 4.77% and economics in terms of cost of electricity by 5.9% compared to the conventional process. However, the utilization of natural gas in the case 2 is considered as a standalone fuel so the process performance of NGCC power plants has been also incorporated to ensure the realistic analysis. The results also showed that case 2 design offers 3.9% higher process performance than the cumulative (IGCC + NGCC) processes, respectively. Moreover, the CO₂ specific emissions and LCOE for the case 2 is also lower than the case.     

Comparative environmental impact assessment of various fuels and solar heat for a combined cycle

In the present study, a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) for evaluation of the environmental impacts of different fuels to generate electricity through a combined cycle is carried out. For this purpose, various heat sources including solar thermal, lignite, natural gas, oil, and hydrogen are investigated with LCA methods. The methods considered for the study include CML 2001 and ReCiPe Endpoint. The results of the present LCA study for both methods show that the hydrogen is the best fuel option according to the environmental impacts. The impact categories obtained from CML 2001 are the depletion of abiotic resources, eutrophication, global warming, marine sediment, and aquatic ecotoxicity, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity and the competition of land. Furthermore, the human health, ecosystems and resource availability are investigated with the ReCiPe Endpoint method. The greenhouse gas emissions per kWh electricity generation are 0.19 kg CO₂ eq for solar, 1.21 kg CO₂ eq for lignite, 0.53 kg CO₂ eq for natural gas, 1.11 kg CO₂ eq for oil and 0.04 kg CO₂ eq for hydrogen according to the CML 2001 method.     

Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat,power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies

Bioenergy is regarded as cost-effective option to reduce CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel combustion. Among newly developed biomass conversion technologies are biomass integrated gas combined cycle plants (BIGCC) as well as ethanol and methanol production based on woody biomass feedstock. Furthermore, bioenergy systems with carbon capture and storage (BECS) may allow negative CO₂ emissions in the future. It is still not clear which woody biomass conversion technology reduces fossil CO₂ emissions at least costs. This article presents a spatial explicit optimization model that assesses new biomass conversion technologies for fuel, heat and power production and compares them with woody pellets for heat production in Austria. The spatial distributions of biomass supply and energy demand have significant impact on the total supply costs of alternative bioenergy systems and are therefore included in the modeling process. Many model parameters that describe new bioenergy technologies are uncertain, because some of the technologies are not commercially developed yet. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to analyze model parameter uncertainty. Model results show that heat production with pellets is to be preferred over BIGCC at low carbon prices while BECS is cost-effective to reduce CO₂ emissions at higher carbon prices. Fuel production – methanol as well as ethanol – reduces less CO₂ emissions and is therefore less cost-effective in reducing CO₂ emissions.     

Opportunities for integration of biofuel gasifiers in natural-gas combined heat-and-power plants in district-heating systems

As political pressure to improve efficiency and reduce CO₂-emissions increases, natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat-and-power (CHP) technology is an increasingly attractive option for district-heating systems. However, as CO₂-emissions reduction targets become more ambitious, it is expected that there will be pressure to reduce CO₂-emissions from such units well before they reach the end of their useful lifetime. One way to achieve this goal is to integrate a biofuel gasification unit at the plant site. After clean-up, the produced syngas can be co-fired in the CHP unit. This paper discusses the economic performance of this type of retrofit, with specific emphasis on the impact of the following parameters: (i) the original NGCC CHP plant’s power-to-heat ratio; (ii) the size of the district-heating system’s annual heat-energy demand; (iii) the fuel mix in the district-heating system; and (iv) the availability of low-cost waste-heat that can be delivered to the district-heating system. The economic performance of the retrofitted CHP unit is measured as the overall cost of electricity production (COE). COE is analysed for four different energy-market parameter sets (referred to as Scenarios), including fuel prices, costs associated with energy and climate change policy instruments, and market electricity prices. The results indicate that even relatively high costs associated with CO₂ emissions are insufficient to motivate retrofitting an NGCC CHP unit with an integrated biofuel-gasification unit. To promote this type of retrofit, an additional premium value for electricity generated from renewable fuel sources is required (such as the Swedish REC renewable energy certificate system). An unexpected result of this study is that the required value of REC is essentially independent of the energy market scenario considered.     

Thermo‐economic investigation: an insight tool to analyze NGCC with calcium‐looping process and with chemical‐looping combustion for CO2 capture

In this work, three kinds of natural gas‐based power generation processes for CO₂ capture and storage, that is, natural gas‐combined cycle with pre‐combustion decarburization (NGCC‐PRE), NGCC‐PRE with calcium‐looping process, and NGCC‐PRE with chemical‐looping combustion (NGCC‐CLC), are analyzed by Aspen Plus. The effects of two decisive variables (i.e., steam‐to‐natural gas (S/NG) ratio and oxygen‐to‐natural gas (O/NG) ratio) on the thermodynamic performances of individual process, such as energy and exergy efficiencies, are investigated systematically. Based on simulation outcomes, all the three processes are favored by operating at S/NG = 2.0 and O/NG = 0.65. Furthermore, comparisons of individual system efficiencies and exergy destruction contributor are herein involved. The results show that the highest system efficiencies and lowest exergy destruction are achieved in the NGCC‐CLC process. In addition, capital investment, dynamic payback period, net present value, and internal rate of return are used for deciding the economic feasibility and surely are involved in this work for comparison purpose. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The role of policy instruments for promoting combined heat and power production with low CO2 emissions in district heating systems

Policy instruments clearly influence the choice of production technologies and fuels in large energy systems, including district heating networks. Current Swedish policy instruments aim at promoting the use of biofuel in district heating systems, and at promoting electric power generation from renewable energy sources. However, there is increasing pressure to harmonize energy policy instruments within the EU. In addition, natural gas based combined cycle technology has emerged as the technology of choice in the power generation sector in the EU. This study aims at exploring the role of policy instruments for promoting the use of low CO₂ emissions fuels in high performance combined heat and power systems in the district heating sector. The paper presents the results of a case study for a Swedish district heating network where new large size natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat and power (CHP) is being built. Given the aim of current Swedish energy policy, it is assumed that it could be of interest in the future to integrate a biofuel gasifier to the CHP plant and co‐fire the gasified biofuel in the gas turbine unit, thereby reducing usage of fossil fuel. The goals of the study are to evaluate which policy instruments promote construction of the planned NGCC CHP unit, the technical performance of an integrated biofuelled pressurized gasifier with or without dryer on plant site, and which combination of policy instruments promote integration of a biofuel gasifier to the planned CHP unit. The power plant simulation program GateCycle was used for plant performance evaluation. The results show that current Swedish energy policy instruments favour investing in the NGCC CHP unit. The corresponding cost of electricity (COE) from the NGCC CHP unit is estimated at 253 SEK MWh^?1, which is lower than the reference power price of 284 SEK MWh^?1. Investing in the NGCC CHP unit is also shown to be attractive if a CO₂ trading system is implemented. If the value of tradable emission permits (TEP) in such as system is 250 SEK tonne^?1, COE is 353 SEK MWh^?1 compared to the reference power price of 384 SEK MWh^?1. It is possible to integrate a pressurized biofuel gasifier to the NGCC CHP plant without any major re‐design of the combined cycle provided that the maximum degree of co‐firing is limited to 27–38% (energy basis) product gas, depending on the design of the gasifier system. There are many parameters that affect the economic performance of an integrated biofuel gasifier for product gas co‐firing of a NGCC CHP plant. The premium value of the co‐generated renewable electricity and the value of TEPs are very important parameters. Assuming a future CO₂ trading system with a TEP value of 250 SEK tonne^?1 and a premium value of renewable electricity of 200 SEK MWh^?1 COE from a CHP plant with an integrated biofuelled gasifier could be 336 SEK MWh^?1, which is lower than both the reference market electric power price and COE for the plant operating on natural gas alone. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Transitioning electricity systems: The environmental benefits and economic cost of repurposing surplus electricity in non-conventional end users

A power grid with a lower global warming impact has the potential to extend its benefits to energy systems that conventionally do not utilize electricity as their primary energy source. This study presents the case of Ontario where the role of complementing policies in transitioning electricity systems is assessed. The policy cost to incentivize surplus low emission electricity via an established mechanism for the transportation sector has been estimated (Electric and Hydrogen Vehicle Incentive Program). It is estimated that the 9056 (4760 battery and 4296 plug-in hybrid) electric vehicles that qualified for incentives from the provincial government at the end of 2016 vehicles cost $732.5-$883.9 to reduce a tonne of CO_2,e emissions over an eight year lifetime. This is then compared with the potential cost incurred by two power to gas energy hubs that utilize clean surplus electricity from the province to offset emissions within the natural gas sector. The use of hydrogen-enriched natural gas and synthetic natural gas (SNG) offsets emissions at $87.8 and $228.7 per tonne of CO_2,e in the natural gas sector. This analysis highlights the potential future costs for incentivizing new clean technologies such as electric vehicles and power to gas energy hubs in jurisdictions with a transitioning electricity system.