A comparison of self-reported drug use with a urine drug screen in a working population: Correction.

Reports an error in the original article by R. Bharucha-Reid et al (Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1995, Vol 3 [3], 280–286). Rachel Kaufmann was inadvertently misspelled. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1996-92908-001.) This study summarized information on 162 workers who completed urine screen and self-report concerning drug use. It is the first to compare self-report of drug use in the workplace with a urine screen in which individual participant (nonaggregate) data were used. The findings indicate that agreement between the 2 methods of drug detection, although statistically significant, is at best only moderate. The level of agreement was consistent for segments of the sample when divided by sociodemographic characteristics. Although urine screen may be the more reliable and accurate method of detecting prevalence of drug use, self-report must be considered to assess drug use histories and the role of other variables. These 2 methods should be considered as complementary assessment techniques; the appropriate method depends on the conditions and purposes of the drug use study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A comparison of self-reported drug use with a urine drug screen in a working population.

This study summarized information on 162 workers who completed urine screen and self-report concerning drug use. It is the first to compare self-report of drug use in the workplace with a urine screen in which individual participant (nonaggregate) data were used. The findings indicate that agreement between the 2 methods of drug detection, although statistically significant, is at best only moderate. The level of agreement was consistent for segments of the sample when divided by sociodemographic characteristics. Although urine screen may be the more reliable and accurate method of detecting prevalence of drug use, self-report must be considered to assess drug use histories and the role of other variables. These 2 methods should be considered as complementary assessment techniques; the appropriate method depends on the conditions and purposes of the drug use study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Employee drug use, demographic characteristics, work reactions, and absenteeism.

Investigated the relationships between employee use of illicit drugs, perceptions of and reactions to the work environment, and employee absenteeism and tardiness above and beyond that accounted for by demographic and work reaction variables. 162 employees in a large work organization completed demographic and background information and assessments of work perceptions and reactions and absenteeism and tardiness. Drug use was assessed with a questionnaire and urine testing. Employee drug use accounted for additional statistically significant variance in overall absenteeism and in absenteeism due to injuries and suspensions, as well as days tardy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)