Service life planning and performance requirements

Service life planning comprises a model for the determination of a reasonable expected service life for buildings and components, and it establishes a routine for the assessment of design alternatives. A design option is considered reasonable when it meets or exceeds performance requirements over time that have been drawn up specifically for the specific project. Due to this assessment reference, there is a very evident link to the concept of performance-based building. Any stakeholder involved in the value chain or in the design process of the building, as well as regulators and building users, can express performance requirements. Identified requirements, both in relevance and in quality, will vary with the stakeholder and his/her perspective of interest. As building sector manufacturers develop most products with reference to standards rather than with reference to specific requirements, there is no direct link from user requirements to the product design. Instead, the building designer has the responsibility to ensure performance requirements are met by the performance of products integrated into the design. As these design decisions also have to be made at the material and component level, a performance-based building would benefit from an established rationale that enables the communication of performance requirements across the relevant system levels in the relevant design processes. A path for the connection of the established concepts of service life planning and performance-based building is presented. The aim is to identify key elements that need to be developed for the successful linkage of performance-based building with service life planning.     

Holistic nursing--definition and realization

Single-channel properties of a delayed rectifier voltage-gated K+ channel (I-type) were investigated in peripheral myelinated axons from Xenopus laevis. Channels activated between -60 and -40 mV with a potential of half-maximal activation, E50, at -47.5 mV. Averaged single-channel currents activated with a time delay at all membrane potentials tested. Time to half-maximal activation decreased from 80 to 1.6 msec between -60 and +40 mV. The channel inactivated monoexponentially with a time constant of 10.9 sec at -40 mV. The time constant of deactivation was 126 msec at -80 mV and 16.9 msec at -110 mV. In symmetrical 105 mM K+, the single-channel conductance (gamma) was 22 and 13 pS at negative and positive membrane potentials, respectively, at 13-15 degrees C. In Na+ -rich solution with 2.5 mM extracellular K+ gamma was 7 pS and the reversal potential was negative to -80 mV, indicating a high selectivity for K+ over Na+. gamma depended on extracellular K+ concentration (KD = 19.6 mM) and temperature (Q10 = 1.45). External tetraethylammonium (TEA) reduced the apparent single-channel amplitude at all potentials tested with a half-maximal inhibiting concentration (IC50) of 0.6 mM. Open probability of the channel, but not single-channel current amplitude was decreased by extracellular dendrotoxin (DTX, IC50 = 6.8 nM). mast cell degranulating peptide (MCDP, IC50 = 41.9 microM). In Ringer solution the membrane potential of macroscopic I-channel patches was about -65 mV and depolarized under TEA and DTX. It is concluded that besides their activation during action potentials, I-channels may also stabilize the resting membrane potential.     

Materialien für die Brillenbeschichtung in Aufdampfanlagen

Materials for ophthalmic coatings in PVD – coating equipments In our days we cannot have an isolated view only at the coatings for organic lenses. We need to analyse the interaction of substrates, hardcoats and layerdesigns to deliver a longlife – quality of the complete complex “eyeglases”. Special in the field of organic substrates we could observe in the last years an enormous change. The push to deliver more and more thinner and lighter lenses, produces materials with higher indices. The result from this problem is not the adaptation of the antireflection desin at the substrate index but the adaption at the mechanical and thermal properties of these substrates. The caoting labs influence at the complete system is more or less reduced only by the antireflection system. The substrate‐ and hardcoat material could be influenced only by the “world player” for ophthalmic systems. All the small and middle size coating labs worldwide must buy the substrates‐ and the hardcoat materials and have to accept the quality. The only exertion of influence is in the selection of film materials for the AR‐coating and the process technology. The right choise of coating material in quality, form and costs is crucial for a high quality AR‐ coating. A multitude of factors must be considered for the selection of the adequate material.