Frataxin is reduced in Friedreich ataxia patients and is associated with mitochondrial membranes

Friedreich ataxia is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by loss of function mutations in the frataxin gene. In order to unravel frataxin function we developed monoclonal antibodies raised against different regions of the protein. These antibodies detect a processed 18 kDa protein in various human and mouse tissues and cell lines that is severely reduced in Friedreich ataxia patients. By immunocytofluorescence and immunocytoelectron microscopy we show that frataxin is located in mitochondria, associated with the mitochondrial membranes and crests. Analysis of cellular localization of various truncated forms of frataxin expressed in cultured cells and evidence of removal of an N-terminal epitope during protein maturation demonstrated that the mitochondrial targetting sequence is encoded by the first 20 amino acids. Given the shared clinical features between Friedreich ataxia, vitamin E deficiency and some mitochondriopathies, our data suggest that a reduction in frataxin results in oxidative damage.     

How inhomogeneities and airway walls affect frequency dependence and separation of airway and tissue properties

It has been proposed that during mild-to-moderate bronchoconstriction one can partition airway and tissue properties on the basis of input impedance (Zin) acquired from 0.1 to 5 Hz (K.R. Lutchen, B. Suki, Q. Zhang, F. Peták, B. Daróczy, and Z. Hantos. J. Appl. Physiol. 77: 373-385, 1994). The approach is to apply a homogeneous lung model that contains airway resistance and viscoelastic tissue damping and elastance parameters. The tissue parameters account for the frequency dependence in lung resistance (RL) and elastance (EL). We present an anatomically consistent asymmetrically branching airway model to address two key questions: 1) How will lung inhomogeneities, airway wall shunting, and tissue viscoelasticity contribute to increased frequency dependence and levels of RL and EL during lung constriction? and 2) How much can lung inhomogeneities and airway wall shunting contribute to our assessment of airway, tissue, and overall lung properties derived from Zin? The model incorporates nonrigid airway walls and allows for explicit control over the type and degree of inhomogeneous airway constriction or tissue changes. Our results indicate that, from 0.1 to 5 Hz, airway wall shunting does not become important unless the entire lung periphery experiences significant constriction. Mild-to-moderate inhomogeneous peripheral airway constriction produces a relatively minor additional frequency dependence in RL and EL beyond that due to the tissues alone. With more extreme constriction, however, there is a marked frequency-dependent increase in EL. This phenomenon may render it impossible to distinguish from a single frequency measurement whether an increase in EL during bronchoconstriction is a consequence of a true increase in tissue stiffening or simply a consequence of airway phenomena. Finally, Zin from 0.1 to 5 Hz can be used to provide a reasonable separation of airway and tissue properties for mild-to-moderate homogeneous or inhomogeneous lung constriction. However, during more severe disease, inhomogeneities and/or wall shunting will produce substantial overestimation of tissue damping and hysteretic properties. In fact, the only reliable indicator of a real change in the tissues may be a change in the estimate of tissue elastance that is based on data extending to a sufficiently low frequency.     

Distribution of radiolabeled monoclonal antibody MX35 F(ab')2 in tissue samples by storage phosphor screen image analysis: evaluation of antibody localization to micrometastatic disease in epithelial ovarian cancer

Our objective was to quantify the targeting of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) MX35 F(ab')2 to micrometastatic epithelial ovarian cancer. This mAb detects a Mr 95,000 glycoprotein with homogeneous distribution on 80% of ovarian tumor specimens. Six patients with minimal residual disease from an imaging trial were injected with 2 or 10 mg of 131I- and 125I-labeled mAb MX35 F(ab')2. Biopsied samples were removed at second-look laparotomy 1-5 days post-i.v. or -i.p. infusion of antibody. Serial cryostat sections were stained by indirect immunoperoxidase method for antigen distribution and exposed to storage phosphor screens for quantitative autoradiography. Coregistration of tumor histology, antigen expression, and radionuclide distribution demonstrated specific localization in micrometastatic tumor foci (50 micrometer to 1 mm) found within tissue stroma. The radiolabeled antibody uptake determined by well scintillation counts ranged between 5.2 and 223.5 x 10(-4) percentage of injected dose/g of tumor tissue for 131I. Specific localization of mAb in tumor was determined by tumor:normal tissue (fat) ratios ranging from 0.9:1 to 35.9:1 for 131I. The high resolution and linear response of the storage phosphor screen imager was used to estimate the radionuclide activity localized in each micrometastatic site. Quantitation of phosphor screen response revealed microCi/g values of 0.026-0.341 for normal tissue and 0.184-6.092 for tumor biopsies, evaluated 4 or 5 days post-antibody injection. The tumor:normal tissue (adjacent to tumor) ratios were between 1 and 4 times greater using the phosphor screen method than well counter measurements, but even larger variations of ratios up to 20:1 were observed between tumor cell foci and stromal cells within the same tissue section. This study has demonstrated that mAb MX35 F(ab')2 localizes to the micrometastatic ovarian carcinoma deposits within the peritoneal cavity. The dosimetry results suggest a therapeutic potential for this antibody in patients with minimal residual disease (<5 mm).     

2C-B: a new psychoactive phenylethylamine recently discovered in Ecstasy tablets sold on the Swiss black market

Amyloid is a biophysically defined, biochemically non-uniform protein which is deposited in the tissue, forming a cross-beta configuration. In paraffin sections it is demonstrated using Congo red staining according to Puchtler et al. and a polarizing microscope with a tension-free clean optic system that shows a typical apple-green birefringence. The identification of amyloid has to be followed by immunostaining for AA, ATTR, A lambda, A kappa and A beta 2 microglobulin and possibly further types of amyloids for classification purposes. Considering the localization, expansion and type localized and generalized types probably can be differentiated. The latter should be correlated to a basic disease. The treatment of the basic disease is the only chance for reducing or eliminating the amyloid deposits. In this review, the modern morphological methods for demonstration and both immunohistological and clinical classification of amyloid and amyloidoses are presented. Rare types are mentioned in the tables.     

Direct effects of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing factor (GRF) on GH secretion from cultured porcine somatotropes

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) belongs to the expanding family of synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs). Previous studies have shown that non-peptidyl GHRP-6 analogues stimulate GH release in vivo in pigs, and interact synergistically with GH-releasing factor (GRF), but its direct effects on porcine somatotropes have not been addressed hitherto. In the present study, we have evaluated the response of cultured porcine pituitary cells to GHRP-6, and its interaction with GRF and somatostatin (SRIF). Secretory response of somatotropes was assessed by using two distinct techniques. GH released by monolayer cell cultures was evaluated by enzyme immunoassay, whereas that secreted by individual somatotropes was measured by immunodensitometry using a cell blotting assay. Our results demonstrate that both GHRP-6 and GRF stimulated GH release from monolayer cultures at doses equal to or above 10(-9) M. Use of cell immunoblot assay demonstrated that, like GRF, the hexapeptide acts directly upon porcine somatotropes to exert its action. Moreover, regardless of the technique applied, combined administration of GHRP-6 (10(-6) or 10(-9) M) and GRF (10(-8) M) resulted in an additive, but not synergistic, stimulatory GH response. Finally, SRIF (10(-7) M) inhibited the stimulatory effect of GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GRF. These results indicate that GHRP-6 directly and effectively stimulates GH secretion from porcine somatotropes in vitro, and acts additively when coadministered with GRF. Therefore, the synergistic stimulatory effect of GHSs and GRF reported in vivo in this species might require additional factors that are lacking in the in vitro situation.