Random and block copolymers based on 4-methyl-1-pentene and 1-pentene

The zirconium acetamidinate catalyst {Cp*Zr(Me)₂[N(Et)C(Me)N(tBu)]} (Cp* = ?⁵-C₅Me₅) was used to synthesize both random and block copolymers based on 4-methyl-1-pentene (4M1P) and 1-pentene. The polymers have been characterized by NMR spectroscopy, SEC, DSC, high temperature HPLC and CRYSTAF. Unexpectedly, the yields and molecular weights decreased with increasing amounts of 1-pentene. The reason for this behavior is that 1-pentene occasionally undergoes 2,1-misinsertions trapping the catalyst in a dormant state. These 2,1-misinsertions do not seem to occur with the bulky 4M1P (branched α-olefin). Adding a small amount of ethylene reactivates the catalyst. Unlike most semi-crystalline polymers, the density of the crystalline phase of isotactic P4M1P can be lower than of the amorphous phase, when crystallized under very high pressures. To characterize this peculiar behavior of 4M1P-based polymers, various samples have been subjected to Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) measurements. While the P4M1P homopolymers and block copolymers show the expected decrease in specific volume upon crystallization, the 4M1P-rich random copolymers proved not to vary in specific volume under the same conditions.     

The Use of Thermodynamic and Kinetic Data in Drug Discovery: Decisive Insight or Increasing the Puzzlement?

The prime property to rate the success of hit‐to‐lead‐to‐drug optimization in drug discovery is binding affinity. Rational approaches try to relate this property with structure. Affinity can be linked to the thermodynamic property, Gibbs free energy of binding, which itself factorizes into enthalpy and entropy. With respect to kinetic properties, affinity can be associated with the ratio of k_off and k_on of complex formation. Do these features help to obtain better insight into affinity? The present viewpoint assesses our current understanding of thermodynamics– or kinetics–structure relationships and questions the accuracy of data collected to learn about the thermodynamic and kinetic basis to comprehend affinity.     

One Question,Multiple Answers: Biochemical and Biophysical Screening Methods Retrieve Deviating Fragment Hit Lists

Fragment‐based lead discovery is gaining momentum in drug development. Typically, a hierarchical cascade of several screening techniques is consulted to identify fragment hits which are then analyzed by crystallography. Because crystal structures with bound fragments are essential for the subsequent hit‐to‐lead‐to‐drug optimization, the screening process should distinguish reliably between binders and non‐binders. We therefore investigated whether different screening methods would reveal similar collections of putative binders. First we used a biochemical assay to identify fragments that bind to endothiapepsin, a surrogate for disease‐relevant aspartic proteases. In a comprehensive screening approach, we then evaluated our 361‐entry library by using a reporter‐displacement assay, saturation‐transfer difference NMR, native mass spectrometry, thermophoresis, and a thermal shift assay. While the combined results of these screening methods retrieve 10 of the 11 crystal structures originally predicted by the biochemical assay, the mutual overlap of individual hit lists is surprisingly low, highlighting that each technique operates on different biophysical principles and conditions.     

Structural Determinants of the Selectivity of 3‐Benzyluracil‐1‐acetic Acids toward Human Enzymes Aldose Reductase and AKR1B10

The human enzymes aldose reductase (AR) and AKR1B10 have been thoroughly explored in terms of their roles in diabetes, inflammatory disorders, and cancer. In this study we identified two new lead compounds, 2‐(3‐(4‐chloro‐3‐nitrobenzyl)‐2,4‐dioxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrimidin‐1(2H)‐yl)acetic acid (JF0048, 3 ) and 2‐(2,4‐dioxo‐3‐(2,3,4,5‐tetrabromo‐6‐methoxybenzyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimidin‐1(2H)‐yl)acetic acid (JF0049, 4 ), which selectively target these enzymes. Although 3 and 4 share the 3‐benzyluracil‐1‐acetic acid scaffold, they have different substituents in their aryl moieties. Inhibition studies along with thermodynamic and structural characterizations of both enzymes revealed that the chloronitrobenzyl moiety of compound 3 can open the AR specificity pocket but not that of the AKR1B10 cognate. In contrast, the larger atoms at the ortho and/or meta positions of compound 4 prevent the AR specificity pocket from opening due to steric hindrance and provide a tighter fit to the AKR1B10 inhibitor binding pocket, probably enhanced by the displacement of a disordered water molecule trapped in a hydrophobic subpocket, creating an enthalpic signature. Furthermore, this selectivity also occurs in the cell, which enables the development of a more efficient drug design strategy: compound 3 prevents sorbitol accumulation in human retinal ARPE‐19 cells, whereas 4 stops proliferation in human lung cancer NCI‐H460 cells.     

Production Rate‐Dependent Key Performance Indicators for a Systematic Design of Biochemical Downstream Processes

Key performance indicators have become a common tool in bioprocess development, as they allow an objective and independent rating and ranking of process alternatives screened. A disadvantage of all key performance indicators developed so far is their strong focus on costs, which makes them neglect the influence of the production rate on the profit of the process. But, since both production costs and production rate have an equally strong impact, both should be considered when decisions have to be made. Therefore, two new key performance indicators are introduced in this work, one for batch and one for continuous processing. They combine product yield, purity performance, variable manufacturing costs, and production rate to one objective. Thereby, misguided trade‐offs between these four individual measures can be replaced by one key performance indicator. This ensures a systematic development of biochemical downstream processes.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Segmented Block Copolymers Based on Hydroxyl‐Terminated Liquid Natural Rubber and α,ω‐Diisocyanato Telechelics

Summary: Segmented block copolymers, consisting of non‐polar soft segments from hydroxyl‐terminated liquid natural rubber (HTNR) and polar hard segments from α,ω‐diisocyanato telechelics obtained by “criss‐cross”‐cycloaddition, have been synthesized. The block copolymer formation took place under relatively mild reaction conditions at 80 °C in dichloroethane in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate as a catalyst. The resulting block copolymers were characterized by spectroscopic techniques (¹H NMR, FTIR, UV‐vis spectroscopy) as well as GPC for molar mass determination. The block copolymers were compression molded in a hot stage press, and the resulting samples were characterized by DSC and stress‐strain measurement. The solubility and phase morphology of the materials have also been studied.

Segmented block copolymer from HTNR and α,ω‐diisocyanato telechelics     

Near-field optical microscopy of femtosecond-laser-reshaped silver nanoparticles in dielectric matrix

ABSTRACT: : Samples containing single silver nanoparticles have been irradiated by intense femtosecond laser pulses to gain a persistent transformation of their shape to ellipsoidal forms. Irradiated and non-irradiated regions of these samples have been analyzed by microscope spectrometry as well as near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM) with several wavelengths and different linear polarizations. The results show the outstanding capability of NSOM technique to detect the individual shape of transformed metallic nanoparticles and to analyze their orientation and aspect ratio.     

In the Nick of Time: Males of the Parasitoid Wasp <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pimpla disparis</Emphasis> Respond to Semiochemicals from Emerging Mates

Males of the parasitoid wasp Pimpla disparis Viereck (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) aggregate on parasitized gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, host pupae when the emergence of a prospective mate is imminent or under way. We tested the hypotheses that the developing parasitoid (“DePa”) inside the host pupal case produces a pheromone that attracts and arrests mate-seeking males, and that the pheromone is most effective during the emergence of the parasitoid from the host. Results obtained in two-choice laboratory experiments, with 4–7-d-old virgin males, indicate that (1) DePa-derived semiochemicals arrest males, (2) the opening of a host pupal case strongly arrests males, and (3) the arrestment cue emanates from oral fluid secreted by both female and male parasitoids while they chew their way out of a host pupal case. This phenomenon implies that emerging females, which are haplodiploid and can reproduce without mating, do not engage in active pheromone signaling to attract males, and that mate-seeking males co-opt chemicals involved in eclosion as a mate-finding cue, taking a 50% chance that the prospective mate is a female.