Eye Movements and Behavioral Responses to Threatening and Nonthreatening Stimuli During Visual Search in Phobic and Nonphobic Subjects.

Spider-phobic and nonphobic subjects searched for a feared/fear-relevant (spider) or neutral target (mushroom) presented in visual matrices of neutral objects (flowers). In half of the displays, the mushroom target was paired with a spider distractor, or a spider target was paired with a mushroom distractor. Although all subjects responded faster to the neutral target than to the feared/fear-relevant target, phobics were slower to respond than nonphobics when a mushroom target was presented with a spider distractor. Their eyes appeared to be drawn to the feared distractor before fixating neutral targets. A further experiment indicated no group differences when subjects merely judged the homogeneity of matrices. Thus, threat seems to capture the attention of phobics only when it is part of a background that subjects are explicitly instructed to ignore. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

New Microalloyed Steels for Forgings

Microalloyed steels for forging applications have been newly developed in order to increase strength and toughness properties which thereby give the possibility for light weight constructions.The properties of these steels are set up by a controlled cooling directly from the forging heat without an additional heat treatment.This aim can be achieved on the one hand by a further development of precipitation hardening ferritic pearlitic steels (AFP-steel) due to an extended use of microalloying elements (AFP-M steel) and on the other hand by microalloyed steels which employ a bainitic microstructure (HDB steel).To adjust the targeted microstructure the temperature control has to be assured down to approx.500℃ for the AFP-M steels and down to approx.300℃ for the HDB steels.     

Deformation Characteristics of Steel Billets with Liquid Core

To investigate the deformation characteristics of billets with liquid core during soft reduction and to clarify the correlation between internal cracks and deformation of the billet in the mushy zone, a fully coupled thermo‐mechanical Finite Element Model was developed in ABAQUS, furthermore, casting and soft reduction tests were carried out in a laboratory strand casting machine. During soft reduction the temperature distribution, the stress and strain states in the billet were calculated, the deformation characteristics of the billet during soft reduction were determined and the relation between internal cracks and equivalent plastic strain as well as maximal principal stress was analysed. The results show that tensile stresses can develop in the mushy zone during soft reduction and the equivalent strain nearby the Zero Ductility Temperature (ZDT) increases with a decreasing solid fraction. Internal cracks can be initiated when the accumulated strain exceeds the critical strain and /or the applied tensile stress exceeds the critical fracture stress during solidification. In addition, the factors (reduction efficiency and internal cracks) that should be considered to determine the optimal parameter for the soft reduction were established.     

Experimental and Numerical Failure Criteria for Sheet Metal Forming

For sheet metal forming, often the forming limit diagram (FLD) is used as failure criterion as it can be derived easily in experiments. It is based on the assumption that localization of strain in the sheet plane is responsible for crack initiation, but application of FLD is limited to linear strain paths. Hence, only forming processes with approximately the same deformation history as the experiments carried out for FLD determination should be evaluated by this criterion. Forming limit stress diagrams (FLSD) do not exhibit such strict limitations. They are based on the assumption that principal stresses in the sheet plane are responsible for crack initiation. As these stresses are usually calculated by FE analysis using elastic plastic material laws, strain hardening is considered. Two‐step forming tests as application examples prove the FLSD to be adequate for evaluation of non‐linear forming processes with alternating forming directions. Nevertheless, FLSD are derived in extensive investigations which makes them unattractive for most industrial applications. Furthermore, both FLD and FLSD do not consider the physical background of ductile crack initiation which is provoked by an interaction of local stress triaxiality and equivalent plastic strain. Hence, a reliable failure criterion should concentrate on these two parameters. The Gurson‐Tvergaard‐Needleman‐ (GTN‐) damage model can predict crack initiation during sheet metal forming. Application of the GTN model to 2 step forming tests with the bake hardening steel H220BD+Z showed good agreement to experimental results although a sensitivity of the model to mesh size and stress triaxiality is observed.     

Chemistry effects on the crack susceptibility of structural steels during continuous casting

This work is a review of research results, which have been determined in recent years in order to reveal the effects of the chemical compositions on the high temperature properties of structural steels. Special emphasis has been laid on the solidification structure, phase reactions and precipitates. For this comparison exemplary different structural steel grades have been chosen. The effect of the chemical composition on the solidification structure is shown by increasing Ni mass contents up to 10 %, the influence on the phase transformation is illustrated on the basis of a steel with a Mn mass content of 1.6 % and varying carbon contents. The influence of precipitates has been investigated both on the basis of the Mn/S‐ratio and by microalloyed structural steels with different Nb, V and Ti additions. For all these steel grades the laboratory testing conditions were the same. The high temperature properties of steels can be investigated by high temperature tensile tests; the range of good ductility is determined by the measurement of the reduction of area, e.g. RoA > 50 % or >70 %. The upper limit of the ductility range is the temperature of zero ductility, T_ZD%. The lower limit of the good ductility range is marked by the transition to the ductility minimum II. The experiments for a series of different structural steels show that the hot ductility properties are affected by the metallurgical phenomena mentioned before.