Mechanical property changes in sapphire by nickel ion implantation and their dependence on implantation temperature

Sapphire plates, cut parallel to an {0001} plane, have been implanted with 300 keV nickel ions to doses ranging from 5×10¹² to 1×10¹⁷ Ni cm^–2 at specimen temperatures of 100, 300 and 523 K, in order to investigate the effect of implantation temperature on the mechanical property changes in sapphire caused by ion implantation. The measured changes in surface hardness, surface fracture toughness and bulk flexural strength were found to depend strongly on the implantation temperature, and were largely correlated with the residual surface compressive stress measured by using a cantilever beam technique. The surface amorphization that occurred only by the implantation at 100 K and at doses larger than 2×10s15 Ni cm^–2 reduced the hardness to 0.6 relative to the value of the unimplanted sapphire, and considerably increased the surface plasticity. Furthermore, the amorphization was found to involve a large volume expansion of 30% and to change drastically the apparent shape and size of a Knoop indentation flaw made prior to implantation. This effect was suggested to reduce stress concentrations at surface flaws and hence to increase the flexural strength.     

Effect of stress-strain-law transients on formability

The effect of work-hardening changes, of the type that follow a rapid change of strain state or strain rate, on formability has been investigated using finite element modeling (FEM). A standard sheet tensile test was chosen as an arbitrary forming operation and a rigid-viscoplastic FEM program was employed for analysis. In each case, a transitional region of true strains between 0.1 and 0.2 was modeled. Transients involving lowered work-hardening rates (negative value of An) promoted increased strain localization and premature failure while transients with increased work-hardening rates enhanced formability. Total engineering elongations (50 mm gage length) varied between 20 pct and 46 pct, illustrating the importance of the transient far beyond the transient region. The controlling factor is the effective work-hardening rate in the transient region rather than the change in strength coefficient or flow stressper se. A direct stress offset of the flow curve { } also affects strain localization through a change in effective work-hardening rate.