Inability of the acidic fibroblast growth factor mutant K132E to stimulate DNA synthesis after translocation into cells

Acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) is a potent mitogen. It acts through activation of specific cell surface receptors leading to intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation cascades, but several reports also indicate that aFGF enters cells and that it has an intracellular function as well. The aFGF(K132E) mutant binds to and activates fibroblast growth factor receptors equally strongly as the wild-type, but it is a poor mitogen. We demonstrate that aFGF(K132E) enters NIH 3T3 cells and is transported to the nuclear fraction like wild-type aFGF. A fusion protein of aFGF(K132E) and diphtheria toxin A-fragment (aFGF(K132E)-DT-A) and a similar fusion protein containing wild-type aFGF (aFGF-DT-A) were reconstituted with diphtheria toxin B-fragment. Both fusion proteins were translocated to the cytosol by the diphtheria toxin pathway and subsequently recovered from the nuclear fraction. Whereas translocation of aFGF-DT-A stimulated DNA synthesis in U2OSDR1 cells lacking functional fibroblast growth factor receptors, aFGF(K132E)-DT-A did not. The mutation disrupts a protein kinase C phosphorylation site in the growth factor making it unable to be phosphorylated. The data indicate that a defect in the intracellular action of aFGF(K132E) is the reason for its strongly reduced mitogenicity, possibly due to inability to be phosphorylated.     

Mutagenesis of some positive and negative residues occurring in repeat triad residues in the ADP/ATP carrier from yeast

In AAC2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nine additional charged residues (six positive, three negative) were neutralized by mutagenesis following the previous mutation of six arginines. Oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) in cells and mitochondria, the expression level of AAC protein, and the various transport modes of AAC in the reconstituted system were measured. Mutations are: within the first helix at K38A which is exclusive for AAC; K48A, and R152A, part of a positive triad occurring in the matrix portion of each repeat; two matrix lysines, K179M and K182I, and the negative triad helix-terminating residues, E45G, D149S, D249S. Cellular ATP synthesis (OxPhos) is nearly completely inhibited in K48A, R152A, D149S, and D249S, but still amounts to 10% in K38A and between 30% and 90% in the gly+ mutants K179M, K179I + K182I, and E45G. Comparison of the AAC content measured by ELISA and the binding of [3H]CAT and [3H]BKA reveals discrepancies in K48A, D149S, and D249S mitochondria, which provide evidence that these mutations largely abolish inhibitor binding. Also these mitochondria have undetectable OxPhos. Differently in K38A, CAT and BKA binding are retained at high AAC levels but OxPhos is very low. This reveals a special functional role of K38, different from the more structural role of R152, K48, D149, and D249. Transport activity was measured with reconstituted AAC. The electroneutral ADP/ADP exchange of gly- mutants is largely or fully suppressed in K48A, D149S, and D249S. K38A and R152A are still active at 18% and 30% of wt. The other three exchange modes, ATP/ADP, ADP/ATP, and ATP/ATP, are nearly suppressed in all gly- mutants but remain high in gly+ mutants. ATP-linked modes are higher than the ADP/ADP mode in gly+ but lower in gly- mutants, resulting in an exchange mode inversion (EMI). In the competition for AAC2 transport capacity, the weak ATP exporting modes are suppressed by the much stronger unproductive ADP/ADP mode causing inhibition of OxPhos. Together with previous results all members of three charge triads are now mutagenized, revealing drastic functional rotatory asymmetries within the three repeat domains. In the intrahelical arginine triad the third (R294A), in the positive matrix triad the second (R152A), and in the helix-terminating negative triad the first (E45G) still show high activity.     

In the uncoupling protein (UCP-1) His-214 is involved in the regulation of purine nucleoside triphosphate but not diphosphate binding

The nucleotide binding to uncoupling protein (UCP-1) of brown adipose tissue is regulated by pH. The binding pocket of the nucleotide phosphate moiety has been proposed to be controlled by the protonization of a carboxyl group (pK approximately 4.5) for both nucleoside diphosphates (NDP) and nucleoside triphosphates (NTP) (identified as Glu-190) and of a histidine (pK approximately 7. 2) for NTP only. Here we identify His-214 as a pH sensor specific for NTP binding only. In reconstituted UCP-1 from hamster, DEPC diminishes binding of NTP but not of NDP. It also prevents inhibition of H+ transport by NTP but not by NDP. Hamster UCP-1 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was mutated to H214N resulting in only moderate change of the binding affinity for NTP (GTP) but a 10-fold affinity decrease with the bulkier substituent in H214W, whereas the affinity for NDP (ADP) was largely unchanged. The steep decrease with pH of the binding affinity for NTP in wild type (from pH 6.0 to 7.5) was much flatter in the mutants. Also, the pH dependence of binding and dissociation rates was diminished in these mutants. The transport of H+ and Cl- was not affected. Thus, His-214 is only involved in nucleotide binding, whereas, as previously shown, His-145 and His-147 are involved only in H+ transport. The results validate the earlier proposal of a histidine regulating the NTP binding in addition to a carboxyl group controlling both NTP and NDP binding. It is proposed that His-214 protrudes into the binding pocket for the gamma-phosphate thus inhibiting NTP binding and that His214H+ is retracted by a background -CO2- group to give way for the gamma-phosphate.     

Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny

The connection between development and evolution has become the focus of an increasing amount of research in recent years, and heterochrony has long been a key concept in this relation. Heterochrony is defined as evolutionary change in rates and timing of developmental processes; the dimension of time is therefore an essential part in studies of heterochrony. Over the past two decades, evolutionary biologists have used several methodological frameworks to analyse heterochrony, which differ substantially in the way they characterize evolutionary changes in ontogenies and in the resulting classification, although they mostly use the same terms. This review examines how these methods compare ancestral and descendant ontogenies, emphasizing their differences and the potential for contradictory results from analyses using different frameworks. One of the two principal methods uses a clock as a graphical display for comparisons of size, shape and age at a particular ontogenic stage, whereas the other characterizes a developmental process by its time of onset, rate, and time of cessation. The literature on human heterochrony provides particularly clear examples of how these differences produce apparent contradictions when applied to the same problem. Developmental biologists recently have extended the concept of heterochrony to the earliest stages of development and have applied it at the cellular and molecular scale. This extension brought considerations of developmental mechanisms and genetics into the study of heterochrony, which previously was based primarily on phenomenological characterizations of morphological change in ontogeny. Allometry is the pattern of covariation among several morphological traits or between measures of size and shape; unlike heterochrony, allometry does not deal with time explicitly. Two main approaches to the study of allometry are distinguished, which differ in the way they characterize organismal form. One approach defines shape as proportions among measurements, based on considerations of geometric similarity, whereas the other focuses on the covariation among measurements in ontogeny and evolution. Both are related conceptually and through the use of similar algebra. In addition, there are close connections between heterochrony and changes in allometric growth trajectories, although there is no one-to-one correspondence. These relationships and outline links between different analytical frameworks are discussed.