Positive and negative daily events, perceived stress, and alcohol use: A diary study.

Using daily diary methodology, the authors examined over 60 days the within-person associations among positive and negative daily experiences, perceptions of stress, desire to drink, and alcohol consumption in a sample of 83 regular drinkers. Multilevel regression analyses indicated that days on which individuals reported more positive and negative nonwork events were also days they reported higher levels of desire to drink and actual consumption. Days on which individuals reported more negative work events were also days they reported a greater desire to drink, and days on which individuals reported more positive and negative health events were also days they reported lower levels of desire to drink and actual consumption. Weak evidence was found for the mediating effects of perceived stress in these associations. Several of the within-person associations varied as a function of gender, neuroticism, and drinking to cope; no moderating effects were found for extraversion. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Daily interpersonal experiences, context, and alcohol consumption: Crying in your beer and toasting good times.

The authors explored a multidimensional view of drinking, whereby social and solitary drinking represent distinct behaviors associated with positive and negative experiences, respectively. Using daily diary methodology and multilevel analytic strategy, the authors examined, over 30 days, the within-person association of negative and positive experiences and alcohol consumption in different contexts and focused on interpersonal experiences. On days with more negative interpersonal experiences, participants engaged in more solitary drinking (i.e., drinking at home and alone), whereas on days with more positive interpersonal experiences they drank more in social contexts. The authors also demonstrated that individuals high on neuroticism drank more in solitary contexts on days with more negative interpersonal experiences, relative to those with lower neuroticism. These findings lend support to models linking daily drinking motivation and context-dependent drinking behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments.

The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A Daily Process Examination of the Stress-Response Dampening Effects of Alcohol Consumption.

The authors used a daily process design to assess alcohol's stress-response dampening (SRD) effects. Moderate to heavy social drinkers (N=100) reported on palmtop computers their alcohol consumption and social context in vivo for 30 days. Participants also reported on their mood states in the late morning and early evening and completed a paper-and-pencil daily diary in which they recorded their negative events. The association between negative events and mood was weaker on days when individuals consumed alcohol prior to the final mood assessment. However, the moderating effect of alcohol on the negative event-mood association was limited to drinking in social situations. Alcohol's SRD effects varied as a function of several between-person risk factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A daily process approach to coping: Linking theory, research, and practice.

For decades, coping researchers have used between-person designs to address inherently within-person questions derived from theory and clinical practice. The authors describe recent developments in the use of within-person, process-oriented methods that examine individuals intensively over time. Ongoing studies of stress and alcohol consumption, the effects of depression on adaptational processes, and the temporal dynamics of coping with chronic pain demonstrate that by tracking rapidly fluctuating processes such as mood and coping close to their real-time occurrence, daily process designs offer unique insights into conceptually and clinically challenging questions. Such designs also provide new opportunities to examine the purported mechanisms of therapeutic interventions. Despite its demands on participants and investigators, daily process research offers fresh opportunities to link psychological theory, research, and practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Blaming others for threatening events.

Despite inconsistent findings, studies of how people adapt to threatening events continue to focus on the impact of self-blame. We review 25 published studies that have reported, usually as an incidental finding, the adaptational impact of blaming others for threatening events. Blaming others for one's misfortune is associated with impairments in emotional well-being and physical health. Five potential explanations for this relation are examined. Three are derived from a psychoanalytic perspective that views blaming others as a developmental diathesis. The other two—learned helplessness and excuse theory—come from the social psychology literature. We demonstrate that none of these theories explain the observed pattern of findings and that the evidence to date poses some genuine challenges to psychodynamic and social psychological theories of adaptation to life crises. We then present a model that differentiates situational factors and personal characteristics influencing the occasion for blaming others from intrapersonal and interpersonal factors that make such blaming maladaptive. A conceptual and empirical shift in focus from self-blame to other-blame may yield heuristic benefits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Appraisals of control and predictability in adapting to a chronic disease.

In a sample of 92 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, we examined interrelations among various control appraisals, illness predictability, psychosocial adjustment, mood, and illness status. Perceiving greater personal control over the disease and symptoms and perceiving greater health-care-provider control over symptoms were associated with greater illness predictability. Patients reported more personal control over their symptoms than over the course of the disease and thought that their health care providers had more control over disease course than they did themselves. Multiple regression analyses showed that perceiving greater personal control over one's medical care and treatment was associated with positive mood and psychosocial adjustment. Negative mood was also associated with the belief that providers have greater control over the patient's daily symptoms. Patients who had a more severe disease and expressed greater personal control over its course reported greater mood disturbance and were rated as exhibiting less positive adjustment, but those who had more severe daily symptoms and expressed greater personal control over their symptoms reported less mood disturbance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)