Defective expression of the DNA mismatch repair protein, MLH1, alters G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest following ionizing radiation

A role for the Mut L homologue-1 (MLH1) protein, a necessary component of DNA mismatch repair (MMR), in G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest after 6-thioguanine (6-TG) exposure was suggested previously. A potential role for MLH1 in G1 arrest and/or G1-S transition after damage was, however, not discounted. We report that MLH1-deficient human colon carcinoma (HCT116) cells showed decreased survival and a concomitant deficiency in G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest after ionizing radiation (IR) compared with genetically matched, MMR-corrected human colon carcinoma (HCT116 3-6) cells. Similar responses were noted between murine MLH1 knockout compared to wild-type primary embryonic fibroblasts. MMR-deficient HCT116 cells or embryonic fibroblasts from MLH1 knockout mice also demonstrated classic DNA damage tolerance responses after 6-TG exposure. Interestingly, an enhanced p53 protein induction response was observed in HCT116 3-6 (MLH1+) compared with HCT116 (MLH1-) cells after IR or 6-TG. Retroviral vector-mediated expression of the E6 protein did not, however, affect the enhanced G2-M cell cycle arrest observed in HCT116 3-6 compared with MLH1-deficient HCT116 cells. A role for MLH1 in G2-M cell cycle checkpoint control, without alteration in G1, after IR was also suggested by similar S-phase progression between irradiated MLH1-deficient and MLH1-proficient human or murine cells. Introduction of a nocodazole-induced G2-M block, which corrected the MLH1-mediated G2-M arrest deficiency in HCT116 cells, clearly demonstrated that HCT116 and HCT116 3-6 cells did not differ in G1 arrest or G1-S cell cycle transition after IR. Thus, our data indicate that MLH1 does not play a major role in G1 cell cycle transition or arrest. We also show that human MLH1 and MSH2 steady-state protein levels did not vary with damage or cell cycle changes caused by IR or 6-TG. MLH1-mediated G2-M cell cycle delay (caused by either MMR proofreading of DNA lesions or by a direct function of the MLH1 protein in cell cycle arrest) may be important for DNA damage detection and repair prior to chromosome segregation to eliminate carcinogenic lesions (possibly brought on by misrepair) in daughter cells.     

Pharmacoeconomics of intravenous antibiotic use in serious infection

A pharmacoeconomic study of 15 antibiotics available in Barbados was performed. The antibiotics studied were amoxycillin/clavulanate, ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, clindamycin, cloxacillin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, imipenem, metronidazole, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and vancomycin. The costs of use of these compounds were calculated for a five-day course using a formula comprising eight categories: antibiotic purchase cost, maintenance of intravenous access, drug delivery cost, drug monitoring cost, dose readjustment, general monitoring cost, 'sharps' disposal cost and adverse effects. The costs of adverse effects were not included in this study due to lack of accurate data. The total cost of antibiotic use (in U.S. dollars) ranged from $42.52 to $463.73 per five-day course. Generic compounds were less expensive ($45.52 - $98.23) than brand-name compounds ($106.18 - $106.18 - $463.73). Antibiotic purchase costs accounted for proportions of total costs ranging from 7 to 93%. Non-drug costs represented a much greater proportion of total costs of generic compounds. For most compounds the non-drug costs were related to the frequency of dosing, but for gentamicin the non-drug costs were relatively higher because of the need for monitoring of serum gentamicin levels. Efficacy and freedom from side-effects will remain the most important determinants in the choice of antibiotic therapy. However, pharmacoeconomic analyses can provide prescribers with the information required to make cost-effective choices for treatment of their patients.     

Modulation of in vitro and in vivo T-cell responses by transferrin-gallium and gallium nitrate

Gallium is a group IIIa metal that has efficacy in the therapy of malignant disorders such as lymphoma and urothelial tract tumors. Preclinical studies also indicate a role for gallium in autoimmune disorders, suggesting that gallium is able to modulate T-cell immune reactivity. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory action of gallium on T-cell function. Since gallium binds to transferrin in vivo, in vitro studies evaluated the effect of transferrin-gallium (Tf-Ga) on human T cells. Tf-Ga inhibited the mitogen-induced proliferative response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in a dose-dependent fashion. Alloantigen-induced proliferation was also potently suppressed when evaluated in a mixed lymphocyte culture assay. Tf-Ga affected a significant reduction in the density of IL-2 receptors on activated T cells and a slight reduction in the number of CD3+/CD25+ T cells in PHA-stimulated cultures. Neither secretion of interleukin-2 (IL-2) nor the induction of IL-2-stimulated lymphokine-activated killer activity, however, was inhibited by Tf-Ga. Tf-Ga produced significant upregulation of the transferrin receptor (CD71) in T cells as determined by flow cytometric analysis and northern blot assay, but did not affect the percentage of CD3+/ CD71+ T cells after mitogen stimulation. To assess the in vivo effects of gallium on alloreactive T cells, we evaluated the immunosuppressive effect of gallium in a murine model of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Administration of gallium significantly prolonged survival in mice undergoing severe GVHD, suggesting that gallium can ameliorate GVH reactivity. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, at clinically achievable concentrations, Tf-Ga potently inhibits T-cell activation and that this immunosuppressive property of gallium may be of adjunctive therapeutic value in the management of disorders characterized by the presence of autoreactive or alloreactive T-cell populations.     

Lymphoblastic leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The outcome in childhood leukaemia has shown steady improvement over the last decade and efforts are now concentrated on the stratification of patients by risk factors which may avoid overtreatment of good risk patients and limit dose escalation strategies, including those with bone marrow transplantation, to the higher risk patients. In ALL, risk stratification is based on the presenting white cell count, sex, age and cytogenetics of the tumour cells. Even in acute myeloid leukaemia, the outcome with chemotherapy alone is now sufficient to limit elective allogeneic bone marrow transplantation to those who do not have cytogenetically favourable disease. In non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a dramatic improvement in overall survival from 50% to in excess of 80% has been achieved by an escalation in dose and dose intensity of chemotherapy. With this improvement, the prognostic influence of clinical staging has become less clear and recent efforts have concentrated on determining which groups of patients would be cured by less intensive treatment. As for ALL, there is concern about the potential late sequelae in these highly curable children. There remain groups of unusual tumour types, such as anaplastic large cell and peripheral T cell lymphoma, where there remains much to be learned about the pathogenesis and clinical behaviour. The optimum treatment strategy for these subgroups remains to be clarified.     

A neonatal care map based on gestational age

Care maps have been used successfully in the adult population. To evaluate the use of these patient care models in the neonatal population, one Level III NICU compared data on 146 infants who ranged in gestational age from 24 to 33 weeks. Nine clinical benchmarks were identified as serving to define the infant's progress. These nine benchmarks were back to birth weight, extubation, discontinuation of hyperalimentation, discontinuation of NCPAP, feeding trial via orogastric tube, weaned to open crib, discontinuation of oxygen, full oral feedings, and discharge home. Gestational age was consistently observed to be the dominant determinant of the infant's readiness to achieve these physiologic tasks. The result of this project is a neonatal care map, based on gestational age. This care map outlines the expected treatment and response of the neonatal patient. It serves as a guide for both clinicians and families.