Activation of the anti-cancer drug ifosphamide by rat liver microsomal P450 enzymes

The NADPH-dependent metabolism of ifosphamide catalyzed by rat liver microsomes was investigated in order to identify individual P450 enzymes that activate this anti-cancer drug and to ascertain their relationship to the P450 enzymes that activate the isomeric drug cyclophosphamide. Pretreatment of rats with phenobarbital or clofibrate increased by up to 8-fold the activation of both ifosphamide and cyclophosphamide catalyzed by isolated liver microsomes. Studies using P450 form-selective inhibitory antibodies demonstrated that constitutively expressed P450s belonging to subfamily 2C (forms 2C11/2C6) make significant contributions to the activation of both oxazaphosphorines in uninduced male rat liver microsomes, while the phenobarbital-inducible P450 2B1 was shown to be a major catalyst of these activations in phenobarbital-induced microsomes. Pretreatment of rats with dexamethasone increased liver microsomal activation of ifosphamide approximately 6-fold without a corresponding effect on cyclophosphamide activation rates. Ifosphamide activation catalyzed by dexamethasone-induced liver microsomes was minimally inhibited by anti-P450 2B or anti-P450 2C antibodies, but was selectively inhibited by anti-P450 3A antibodies. Selective inhibition of liver microsomal ifosphamide activation was also effected by the macrolide antibiotic triacetyloleandomycin, an inhibitor of several dexamethasone-inducible 3A P450s. These studies establish that a dexamethasone-inducible family 3A P450 can make an important contribution to rat liver microsomal ifosphamide activation, and suggest that dexamethasone pretreatment might provide a useful approach for modulation of ifosphamide metabolism in order to improve its therapeutic efficacy in cancer patients.     

Role of cholesterol in regulating apolipoprotein B secretion by the liver

The review examines the evidence that the supply of cholesterol available for incorporation into nascent lipoprotein particles exerts a regulatory influence on apolipoprotein (apo) B secretion by the liver. Support for this hypothesis comes both from in vitro experiments and from recent observations in normal subjects and patients with dyslipidemia associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, obesity, noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus, growth hormone deficiency and cholesteryl ester storage disease. The findings do not negate a role for triglyceride synthesis in determining apoB secretion in very low density lipoprotein, but the inhibitory effects on the latter process of pharmacological blockade of cholesterol synthesis or esterification suggest that it is conditional upon an adequate supply of cholesteryl ester.     

The 70 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of nascent secretory proteins are protected from proteolysis by the ribosome and the protein translocation apparatus of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

We have used proteolysis to examine the environment through which nascent secretory proteins are translocated across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. After solubilization of rough microsomes with detergent, fragments comprised of the approximately 70 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of translocating nascent chains initiated and targeted in vivo were protected from digestion by added proteases. About 40 amino acids of nascent chains were protected from proteolysis by the ribosome; thus, membrane-derived components protect an additional 30 amino acids. Under conditions in which those 30 additional amino acids are protected, only a small set of integral membrane proteins remained associated with the ribosome. These proteins include the Sec61 complex previously identified as the core component of the membrane-bound protein translocation apparatus. These results support the concept of a translocation pore that makes intimate contact with the ribosome and thereby protects nascent chains from proteolytic digestion for an additional, constant length.     

Structure-activity studies of human tumour necrosis factors

The mechanism by which tumour necrosis factors (TNF and lymphotoxin,also called TNFß and TNFß respectively) exerttheir cytotoxic activity on many malignant cells, remains largelyunknown. Furthermore, the broad array of differentiation (geneinduction) and mitogenic activities towards many primary cellsis still a subject of intensive investigation. TNF is an importantmediator in inflammation, immune responses and infection-relatedphenomena and these activities contribute to the severe toxidtyseen when TNF is used as an anticancer agent. The first stepin the mechanism of action is the specific binding of the ligandto its receptors and dissection of the molecular mechanism involvedin this interaction is the subject of this review. The reasonsfor the interest in this aspect are obvious: first, the developmentof strong antagonistic TNF analogues can be useful in dampeningthe potentially lethal or debilitating effects of an overproductionof the cytokine (as in septic shock or rheumatoid arthritis).Secondly, since two distinct TNF receptors exist, constructionof TNF muteins that distinguish between both types may leadto derivatives of this plekrtropic agent with a more restrictedbiological activity pattern. Ideally, one would like to developa TNF mutant that has retained its cytotoxic action on tumourcells without inducing the deleterious systemic toxteity. Suchan optimized TNF molecule could become a potent anticancer agent     

Homologous and heterologous desensitisation of somatostatin-induced increases in intracellular Ca2+ and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in CHO-K1 cells expressing human recombinant somatostatin sst5 receptors

The mechanisms responsible for somatostatin (SRIF)-induced increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and subsequent desensitisation were studied in CHO-K1 cells expressing human sst5 receptors (CHOsst5 cells). To study the nature of the desensitisation, interactions with uridine triphosphate (UTP) were examined. SRIF (pEC50 7.10) and UTP (pEC50) 5.14) caused concentration-dependent increases in [Ca2+]i but the SRIF maximum was about 40% of that to UTP. SRIF-, but not UTP-, induced increases in [Ca2+]i were transient and abolished by pertussis toxin. SRIF and UTP caused sustained increases in Ins(1,4,5)P3 but the SRIF maximum was about 30% of that to UTP. Removal of [Ca2+]e attenuated the SRIF-induced peak rise in [Ca2+]i but had no effect on the peak increases in Ins(1,4,5)P3. UTP-induced increases in [Ca2+]i and Ins(1,4,5)P3 were attenuated in the absence of [Ca2+]e. Following pre-exposure to SRIF (1 microM) or UTP (100 microM) for 5 min, subsequent SRIF responses were desensitised. Similar results were obtained in the absence of [Ca2+]e. Pre-exposure to SRIF had no effect on subsequent responses to UTP but in the absence of [Ca2+]e, responses to UTP were attenuated. The results suggest that SRIF but not UTP-induced increases in [Ca2+]i in CHOsst5 cells are mediated by pertussis toxin sensitive G proteins and are caused by an entry of extracellular Ca2+ and release from an Ins(1,4,5)P3 sensitive Ca2+ store. Homologous or heterologous desensitisation of agonist-induced increases in [Ca2+]i could be demonstrated in the presence or absence of extracellular Ca2+ respectively, and the latter appeared to involve depletion of a common intracellular Ca2+ store.     

Why models rather than rules give a better account of propositional reasoning: A reply to Bonatti and to O'Brien, Braine, and Yang.

D. P. O'Brien et al (see record 1995-08272-001) argue that the mental model theory of propositional reasoning is easy to refute, and they report 3 experiments that they believe falsify the theory. In contrast, L. Bonatti (see record 1995-08253-001) argues that the model theory is too flexible to be falsified. It is shown that the experiments by O'Brien et al do not refute the model theory and that Bonatti's claims are ill founded. Formal rule theories of propositional reasoning have 3 major weaknesses in comparison with the model theory: (1) They have no decision procedure; (2) they lack predictive power, providing no account of several robust phenomena (e.g., erroneous conclusions tend to be consistent with the premises); and (3) as a class of theories, they are difficult to refute experimentally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)