Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty

A prospectively studied group of 55 uncemented Press Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasties was compared retrospectively with a matched group of 51 cemented Press Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasties at a mean of 10 years after operation. For the cemented group, the pain and function scores improved from 32 and 45 preoperatively to 95 and 77, respectively. For the uncemented group the scores improved from 33 and 50 preoperatively to 93 and 60, respectively. There were 10 revisions in the uncemented group for femoral or tibial aseptic loosening or osteolysis compared with two revisions in the cemented group. Exclusive of problems related to patellar metal backing, survival to revision for aseptic failure or radiographic loosening was 72% in the uncemented group and 94% in the cemented group at 10 years. A significantly higher revision rate was found in the uncemented compared with cemented total knee arthroplasty of the Press Fit Condylar design.     

Surgical treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of subclavian artery: carotid-subclavian bypass versus subclavian-carotid transposition

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the short and long term results of two different surgical treatments in patients with subclavian lesions: common carotid-subclavian artery bypass (CSB) versus transposition of subclavian artery on the common carotid artery (SCT). METHODS: From 1981 until 1995, 40 non randomized patients with symptomatic subclavian steal underwent 20 CSBs and 20 SCTs. Risk factor rates were equally balanced in the two groups. Surgery was carried out routinely under general anesthesia, with electroencephalic continuous monitoring. Patency of revascularization was assessed by physical examination, brachial blood pressure determinations, ultrasound sonography and angiography whenever recurrence of symptoms developed or when the function of repair was in doubt. Patients were examined every year. In Spring 1996 (range 9-189 mos, average 7 years) a general clinical-instrumental follow-up was performed. RESULTS: In the short term (<30 days) mortality was 5%: one death (5%) for pulmonary embolism in a patient with CSB and one for myocardial infarction in a patient with SCT. The early thrombosis rate was 5% (1 CSB and 1 common carotid artery distal to a patent SCT). During follow-up 10 patients (25%) died and 6 were lost. The six-year actuarial patency rate was 100% for SCT and 66% for CSB. Moreover there were 3 thromboses of the vertebral artery homolateral to patent CSBs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusions SCT should be considered the surgical technical choice for the treatment of proximal subclavian artery lesions.     

C3a is a chemotaxin for human eosinophils but not for neutrophils. I. C3a stimulation of neutrophils is secondary to eosinophil activation

Inflammatory action of the potent chemotaxin C5a has been well characterized on a variety of human cell types, including neutrophils, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils. The cellular effects of C3a are less well defined. Contradictory reports have been published for C3a activation of neutrophils. Recent reports that C3a activates both basophils and eosinophils prompted us to reinvestigate the effects of C3a stimulation on eosinophils. We hypothesized that C3a activation of eosinophils, cells that are present in most neutrophil preparations, might lead to neutrophil activation. Using neutrophils of 98% purity, we observed no evidence of cellular activation after stimulation with either C3a, recombinant human C3a (rhC3a), or the synthetic C3a analogue C3a 57-77, Y57. Eosinophils purified to > 98% purity displayed concentration-dependent polarization, chemotaxis, and enzyme release by stimulation with C3a, rhC3a, and the synthetic C3a analogue. An inactive form of C3a, C3adesArg, failed to stimulate either eosinophils or neutrophils. Using neutrophil preparations containing 5-9% eosinophils, up to 20% of neutrophils became polarized after exposure to C3a. Likewise, we demonstrated that supernatant from C3a-stimulated eosinophils promotes neutrophil chemotaxis. Eosinophil polarization experiments were repeated in the presence of antibody to the C5a receptor (C5aR) to show that C3a and C5a interact with different receptors. C3a activates eosinophils in the presence of anti-C5aR antibody at concentrations that fully block C5a activation. We conclude that eosinophils are directly activated by either C3a or C5a, whereas C3a failed to activate neutrophils. C3a acts on eosinophils via a receptor that is distinct from C5aR. Since neutrophils are indirectly stimulated by C3a, eosinophils contaminating neutrophil preparations may explain earlier reports that C3a activates human neutrophils.     

Isolation and characterization of three Dictyostelium myosin-I isozymes

Using ion exchange chromatography and an ATP-dependent actin precipitation step, we have isolated three myosin-I isozymes that, together, account for most of the K+EDTA-ATPase activity recovered from extracts of Dictyostelium. The two major myosin-I isozymes, present in approximately equal amounts, had apparent molecular masses of 125 kDa on SDS gels and have been identified by amino acid sequence analysis as the products of the Dictyostelium myosin-IB (DMIB) and myosin-ID (DMID) genes. DMIB, with a specific K+EDTA-ATPase activity 10-fold higher than DMID, was responsible for most of the activity in cell extracts. The third isozyme, present in low amounts, had an apparent molecular mass of 137 kDa on SDS gels and is too large to be the product of any of the known myosin-I genes. DMIB eluted from DE53 cellulose columns as two distinct peaks (II and III). Addition of the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid to the extraction buffer increased the fraction of DMIB recovered from growth phase cells in peak III from 35 to 70%. DMIB isolated from peak III, but not from peak II, displayed a significant level of actin-activated MgATPase activity. These results indicate that peak III represents a phosphorylated, actin-activatable form of DMIB.     

Methotrexate in the management of severe steroid dependent asthma

AIMS: This study was designed to assess the efficacy of low dose methotrexate, 15 mg weekly, as a steroid-sparing agent in asthmatic patients requiring long-term oral prednisone treatment. METHODS: The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, cross over study of 48 weeks duration. Eleven patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma were included. A successful outcome was defined as a reduction in mean prednisone requirements of 7 mg daily compared to baseline requirements, during active treatment. RESULTS: Two patients were required to be withdrawn owing to methotrexate-related adverse effects. The mean prednisone dose for patients who completed the study was 14.4 mg per day (95% CI; 13.6, 15.1) during active treatment, and 12.9 mg per day (95% CI: 12.2, 13.6) during placebo treatment (NS). Only one patient reduced his individual dose requirements by more than 7 mg per day, whereas in three patients prednisone requirements actually increased during active treatment. There were no significant differences in symptom scores, pulmonary function data, and exacerbations between active and placebo treatments. CONCLUSION: No significant steroid-sparing effect was obtained using low dose methotrexate in this study. This negative outcome may be attributable to the small population of patients studied, low baseline FEV1, and the omission of a steroid minimisation run-in period. Our results highlight the importance of careful patient selection and a painstaking approach in the management of patients with steroid-dependent asthma.